Menu
▾
▴
mingw-msys — A members only discussion list for the use of MSYS.
This list is closed, nobody may subscribe to it.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(49) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(175) |
Apr
(189) |
May
(150) |
Jun
(113) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(126) |
Sep
(108) |
Oct
(171) |
Nov
(195) |
Dec
(164) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(70) |
Mar
(76) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(81) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(99) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(59) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(77) |
May
(133) |
Jun
(221) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(113) |
Sep
(122) |
Oct
(124) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(60) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(78) |
Feb
(107) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(37) |
Aug
(74) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(61) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(63) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(67) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(35) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(78) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(82) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
|
Apr
(12) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: ralph e. <ral...@gm...> - 2012-04-14 22:20:06
|
Hmm ok ? any reason in particular maybe plans to do what it does in code instead ? (the better solution). Im still working on a few things msys related but because of health issues im not on as much as i where before, but when time and and issues permit ill keep on it. Ralph. |
|
From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2012-04-14 16:57:56
|
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 12:51 AM, ralph engels <ral...@gm...> wrote: > Just uploaded an enhanced version of cygpath that follows cygwins more Cygpath will not be used. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd |
|
From: ralph e. <ral...@gm...> - 2012-04-14 04:51:59
|
Just uploaded an enhanced version of cygpath that follows cygwins more closely. Only option missing is the mode switch for text or binary (not even sure if needed since the runtime "msys-1.0.dll" seem to check for that allready ?). Reason i made this is that i sometimes run into sources which croak at the missing mixed mode support so i have to patch those. Preliminary testing shows no problems, but if you run into something let me know. If you find it ok i allready made it part of the msys core sources and can upload it in case you want this. Also added ldd and kill to the msys core source and the source was modified so it now compiles with gcc4. Several other enhancements added also so building more recent stuff still possible with msys-1.0 with minimal hackery. Might keep it afloat untill Msys2 is ready. file here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cbadvanced/files/Msys%20Specific/cygpath-enhanced.7z/download |
|
From: Lars U. <lar...@dl...> - 2012-04-04 11:55:13
|
On 04/04/2012 01:47 PM, Alex Biddulph wrote: > [ spam link removed ] > Alex, I believe you caught a worm/trojan... Cheers Lars -- Dipl.-Ing. Lars Uffmann Microgravity User Support Center (MUSC) Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Linder Höhe D-51147 Köln phone: +49 (0)2203 601 2171 http://www.dlr.de/musc |
|
From: Ralph E. <ral...@gm...> - 2012-02-27 18:23:18
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ok seems i misunderstood then, sorry. Revelator -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPS8oJAAoJEIjGvG7Y4HU8e6QH/R3FGhXPf//AO8er/iNxldJT Ddn/zOGq0/lOar+utrMTAFvhR6pB1OeESkWUaZu7S5HXTn3TYvkcGgXur9aQJNeT UpE/wWJ5lZoXpanzVd9zcPmOvkVsH943RMFUchN+HAF9UC2tO+GF16/T5jlnnJXA 03L/vHVNEe7Oaq/k0HRtGbqnZ2+keOjGrO0kDqq9hRb4vLQFn7qmL+kddX/Fjqc5 CLI+p2SKdY2DB8pjJaKnK6ROuUpBV/dlrbnUjSD0ZT7RtoJ6beO7bu9PHdVpbqdB Hljtti/fC69rw1O+1lie5S+1hCyArIAXiOQaDPrr5W9iE32m7F0nrZ+oqNzzRzQ= =T80C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2012-02-27 17:35:15
|
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Ralph Engels <ral...@gm...> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > While mostly an experiment on my part i agree to this. I allready > ported numerous cygwin tools like tetex etc. to msys. And they make my > work heaps easier now that i have something that can handle the stuff > i dont have win32 tools for. Ruby might be questionable though but > maybe some ruby devs will disagree with me on that one (im not one so > cant tell) :). > I didn't care that about asking for testers to test the package and give comment. I was just trying to prevent MSYS is the new Cygwin and requesting a case for need for MSYS dependence. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd |
|
From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2012-02-27 17:33:28
|
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Charles Wilson <cwi...@us...> wrote: > On 2/27/2012 8:19 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote: >> This is something that does not fit the purpose of MinGW.org providing >> MSYS. Can you convince me why Ruby would be needed under the MSYS >> Runtime? There is already a Windows version of it. The purpose of >> MSYS is simply to provide a mechanism to execute a typical configure >> script to create a Makefile to be able to execute make. I have not >> seen a configure script that uses Ruby. > > While I agree that we should follow the "Minimal" nature of msys for > core and extension tools, and not try to replace cygwin, the > "contributed" part of our toolset is not so restricted, IIRC. > Ok, but in order to not replace Cygwin, even such a contributed module should prove a need to be MSYS runtime dependent, IMO. There are some items that just work better in cooperation with MSYS as an MSYS dependent app and those I would agree should become a contributed MSYS module. > Finally, even if we decide on some set of rules for "our" contributed > area that excludes ruby, I think it's appropriate for external > contributors to at least mention their mingw-get-compatible offerings here. Of course. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd |
|
From: Ralph E. <ral...@gm...> - 2012-02-27 16:57:57
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 While mostly an experiment on my part i agree to this. I allready ported numerous cygwin tools like tetex etc. to msys. And they make my work heaps easier now that i have something that can handle the stuff i dont have win32 tools for. Ruby might be questionable though but maybe some ruby devs will disagree with me on that one (im not one so cant tell) :). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPS7YMAAoJEIjGvG7Y4HU8OlMIAJ/n7l4fl0IJtq2awD1rU6Nc DAlvhvgyWR5+zSu9X1/ILpuzVpKskw5o7mJ626tvTqgWqodC030gk88PxfdsWaXI 9URmvZRo666wdAd1hVC9B8MR5+mvVJ+Gr3Ozdn8zQi3QknnpBZHeIRPpLlSfh0bb BJ+AyxKWSNmFf1q4/J83+hD/PqK3K/LOo/0/yddJ7Fc2v4SSYCVA6Gy746Y1rJ+X 4RE7MSc1lwUhWwPCJLwfLAWAJDOh1Z56zKjjZx5sVWzCNWm2/cPqKU+jlJjiA4KU hOX0tYyok1vEzdEw52tS7fA+aG2BUVW5GufobOW+PDpA6AHQMA+7MTTQrPXDjs8= =RkS5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Ralph E. <ral...@gm...> - 2012-02-27 16:50:55
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mostly an experiment to figure out what works better in the different environments no need to make it an official Msys package. It was probably inapropriate posting it here as there is a win32 version. Sorry for that. Revelator -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPS7RmAAoJEIjGvG7Y4HU8TUcH/3bsPS5qNDDe06F7fNOcVH7h JVS/SK7WRAQFxs7XLRfY0zol7dmxVHRTunHmhuSPeuzk+uJqdySEe3ALac9znKsl OKKa09MXJXYOpMThDbB7uaXGz//SAqIQijEBmd3u8RhR1xV849/PLQtFDE3Mmz95 mYoVDlzmcpWVdPurbaAFyQ3dO9OA2HmsHF1LLGkVsPJgklGYyeUEGUAmWrLCtAaT p0RJK0W5Bhp3OWM/rTwvyMmrSzC1upzu6NJmnbQ7BvbJj+tLM90KTfYhB46xFYdb tfqMXTugKAN3B9toZLh0pxulXh5A9dqOwx3drbW9zygMNieZJX4y3BWRCmzPf9I= =MUAs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Charles W. <cwi...@us...> - 2012-02-27 15:06:10
|
On 2/27/2012 8:19 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote: > This is something that does not fit the purpose of MinGW.org providing > MSYS. Can you convince me why Ruby would be needed under the MSYS > Runtime? There is already a Windows version of it. The purpose of > MSYS is simply to provide a mechanism to execute a typical configure > script to create a Makefile to be able to execute make. I have not > seen a configure script that uses Ruby. While I agree that we should follow the "Minimal" nature of msys for core and extension tools, and not try to replace cygwin, the "contributed" part of our toolset is not so restricted, IIRC. And there is nothing that prevents any third party from providing any add-on tools they want, from their own website, regardless of any policies we may have. (In fact, it's possible our policies for "what" is accepted into our "contributed" area should be quite loose -- so that we can be strict on "how" those contributed items are packaged. That is, we can use "contributed" as a quality-control for addon packages -- 'these aren't core, but have been validated to play well with others'; if they are relegated to third-party-site pariah status, then they may not, probably will not, play well with core/extended.) Finally, even if we decide on some set of rules for "our" contributed area that excludes ruby, I think it's appropriate for external contributors to at least mention their mingw-get-compatible offerings here. -- Chuck |
|
From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2012-02-27 13:19:25
|
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Ralph Engels <ral...@gm...> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I just uploaded ruby 1.8.3 for msys to my site. > So far it seems to work fine i even got rails running but im not > a ruby developer so if someone could give it a try reports are welcome. > > You might need to rebase (atleast i had to) but after it runs just > fine it seems. > > the package can be found here. > http://sourceforge.net/projects/cbadvanced/files/Msys%20Specific/msys-ruby-1.8.7z/download > > Let me know how it works for you. > This is something that does not fit the purpose of MinGW.org providing MSYS. Can you convince me why Ruby would be needed under the MSYS Runtime? There is already a Windows version of it. The purpose of MSYS is simply to provide a mechanism to execute a typical configure script to create a Makefile to be able to execute make. I have not seen a configure script that uses Ruby. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd |
|
From: Ralph E. <ral...@gm...> - 2012-02-26 14:15:53
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Reuploaded package with the rubyrebase script + ldd-win32 from altbinutils. Rebasing with the script works fine :) though if i could get my hands on the ldd-win32 source i would package it alongside ruby. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPSj6KAAoJEIjGvG7Y4HU8+6sH/2VekuIxUHOvCPeL+NZs7CCf c0MD24dZOmUglG0Hy65CQ0eb56+nCeI7xFVpUbouxt2X/n5YfznAuzie4/6NpflN EAwsUpBqTuXvUyhtkICL7zAxh6Oc2dyYw6a4WpOrAq8gPjsbRxHAeCT3tvUaNgtL 5xCyrVfJmTBPEMDp47zbWD3ZtLBr4gYN0Q234NNtkoKAv2rkf+jf2l8bQXQvZegi pwaRO4tIO1mTZ8wVEklEtE0y2lQ0KAp/vfKT3SGg3035KLKcVr7wMFk6j35MfZAq hCMRppbNMsuPHfqmSRuOKzddF2eDEV/fWh7Bt1vw+SQ4i0dXGucmX8cIIELTt7U= =IDPW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Ralph E. <ral...@gm...> - 2012-02-26 13:21:27
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Forgot, ill have a look at the script he posted for rebasing ruby modules. If it works ok or i can modify it to work with msys ill upload a new package with it. Revelator -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPSjHJAAoJEIjGvG7Y4HU8PccIAJC8Xe92TgWvrr2zBmEPII29 HQhk3UULN0joh8wqxFhjhXOq3oldudiXnfLtsdrzdxn7gTj8wYXGqSBeTsA60t5U k1zVW9xiCNqfhKgEFPux1iZXiTErLM2VJodWWOv7e10IF2DM8dSLQX1vq6dE96aY 2LNNP+r4iHUYe+H+zUhqOH2xorqqQ+tMCm4n7RFlkho72BLS1WJtHXaeXU+a6kBK ChhU6G/AZixqezT9Nubi4gjaP+AI2Z/ivqvjmG9xslllYX7Gt94cn4VkraSenaib 0K+IUMJOUpgjWliG3BEdzV1a/6ruY5y8vvt/zDr9SMnNs6bRmrTEb4SH4URqjiE= =XVxE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Ralph E. <ral...@gm...> - 2012-02-26 13:18:31
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ouch ok was not aware of that. Lets hope it plays nice :). tested rails and ocra, so far working without rebasing ill try some more to see if any stand out. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPSjEYAAoJEIjGvG7Y4HU8Q2wH/1FCQ07MzPrRfbsdJgH6Le+4 YO07YhqFKh7yVjE1BKj4DVE7LM7XGDcLGO/kT7isahfR2wzyfi/3ppdKnD5mjoC1 nxS30AHoge5l97GfbhaKwnmk5naxTkoxqprkhAoKNYtCldZrOXGCnz32XcNQoYgH /dt46w9nDaq/Xvi1DGH5MHMzI0Y5OyeQtw59HLSLR2DWtBJjGJqn82KFJr+dtI9S lgZFueiQX8OW0NiipLzgGdc0YpN8ONKRF9/PShlE/pJxqBJwhdW7kKoNib0f0dE0 IV7S9/beg1O7jidFYryDMIuUq5oNRsrrASBOfUw87vDxbuTtgU3L0xQyi7zFgvw= =jEbh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Greg C. <gch...@sb...> - 2012-02-26 12:39:44
|
On 2012-02-25 22:49Z, Ralph Engels wrote: > > I just uploaded ruby 1.8.3 for msys to my site. > So far it seems to work fine i even got rails running but im not > a ruby developer so if someone could give it a try reports are welcome. > > You might need to rebase (atleast i had to) but after it runs just > fine it seems. If anyone uses "gems" not obtained through your distribution, then they might need to be rebased, too--see: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-02/msg00701.html |
|
From: Ralph E. <ral...@gm...> - 2012-02-25 22:49:11
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I just uploaded ruby 1.8.3 for msys to my site. So far it seems to work fine i even got rails running but im not a ruby developer so if someone could give it a try reports are welcome. You might need to rebase (atleast i had to) but after it runs just fine it seems. the package can be found here. http://sourceforge.net/projects/cbadvanced/files/Msys%20Specific/msys-ruby-1.8.7z/download Let me know how it works for you. Revelator -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPSWVmAAoJEIjGvG7Y4HU85XsH/3DuWPDhS+aKryPRglOT1lhh xsTmkBzS23AgcBR/F3P8/oKRCAhyDoNCzefrm74tngLn0qHFSJuWGUrtSFIv5iWE 6iEs6sYtZnbqdV4Ku3fBI30o56anUEIF7zoxXyG9W9tPuMi0Txt13rBbLpm/cu/8 7oLkB8Uph/4hViNq7dT1ivcd9Ji8nUAcJBojOyho2MJhruCmX/7MtaSlS0mv7ihy Ju8mhyXUVYL4+P7RIWv/mFka5D/wbsdhvVhH9OhtTT8udSQ+2zRq9lOYu6wzQ9g+ b9wfOLnQYx3zFwutISEQdKoCpaUobAfCdcasr7lhRuu50TNzkgU2mhRnGJcYdpc= =633u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2012-02-09 17:03:19
|
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Juergen Pfeifer <ju...@fa...> wrote: > My SF account name is juergenpf Added. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd |
|
From: Juergen P. <ju...@fa...> - 2012-02-09 16:27:41
|
My SF account name is juergenpf > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:29:05 -0500 > From: ea...@us... > To: min...@li... > Subject: Re: [Mingw-msys] MSYS2 Repository > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Teemu Nätkinniemi <sti...@ya...> wrote: > > On 9.2.2012 15:48, Juergen Pfeifer wrote: > > > >> I'm new to this list. I'm interested in contributing to the very promising > >> MSYS2 development, but apparently there is no repository for it right now. > >> Are there any plans to setup a repository (preferrably using GIT) so that > >> efforts can be shared and coordinated? > > > > There is a repository but you have to ask Earnie for access: > > > > http://sourceforge.net/u/earnie/msys2/home/Home/ > > > > Which means I need your SF account name. > > -- > Earnie > -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-msys mailing list > Min...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-msys |
|
From: Teemu N. <sti...@ya...> - 2012-02-09 15:31:51
|
On 9.2.2012 17:25, Earnie Boyd wrote: > added to the repository. I'll sync up with Cygwin 1.7.10 once it is > released. Cygwin 1.7.10 was released on the 5th. |
|
From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2012-02-09 15:29:16
|
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Teemu Nätkinniemi <sti...@ya...> wrote: > On 9.2.2012 15:48, Juergen Pfeifer wrote: > >> I'm new to this list. I'm interested in contributing to the very promising >> MSYS2 development, but apparently there is no repository for it right now. >> Are there any plans to setup a repository (preferrably using GIT) so that >> efforts can be shared and coordinated? > > There is a repository but you have to ask Earnie for access: > > http://sourceforge.net/u/earnie/msys2/home/Home/ > Which means I need your SF account name. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd |
|
From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2012-02-09 15:25:46
|
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Juergen Pfeifer <ju...@fa...> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new to this list. I'm interested in contributing to the very promising > MSYS2 development, but apparently there is no repository for it right now. > Are there any plans to setup a repository (preferrably using GIT) so that > efforts can be shared and coordinated? Currently MSYS2 is housed at http://sourceforge.net/u/earnie/msys2/home/Home/ until we get a more finalized version. I had begun review and some changes have been added to the repository. I'll sync up with Cygwin 1.7.10 once it is released. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd |
|
From: Teemu N. <sti...@ya...> - 2012-02-09 14:33:25
|
On 9.2.2012 15:48, Juergen Pfeifer wrote: > I'm new to this list. I'm interested in contributing to the very promising > MSYS2 development, but apparently there is no repository for it right now. > Are there any plans to setup a repository (preferrably using GIT) so that > efforts can be shared and coordinated? There is a repository but you have to ask Earnie for access: http://sourceforge.net/u/earnie/msys2/home/Home/ |
|
From: Juergen P. <ju...@fa...> - 2012-02-09 14:01:07
|
Hi, I'm new to this list. I'm interested in contributing to the very promising MSYS2 development, but apparently there is no repository for it right now. Are there any plans to setup a repository (preferrably using GIT) so that efforts can be shared and coordinated? Cheers Jürgen |
|
From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2012-01-18 12:54:10
|
The preferred list for this question is min...@li.... On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Marvin Zhang <fan...@gm...> wrote: > HI all, > I'm trying to run this command: find -iname '*.[ch]' -o -iname > '*.[ch]pp' > cscope.files . With same folder, I found the speed is far > lower than in real Linux. Do you have similar experiments? It is Windows and MSYS just pretends to be POSIX. Anything windows though will be slower than Linux, it is just fact. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd |
|
From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2012-01-18 12:51:01
|
The preferred mail list for this question is min...@li.... On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Marvin Zhang <fan...@gm...> wrote: > HI all, > I'm trying to use ln command in msys, such as 'ln -s A B'. A is a > folder, I just want to create B as for A's symbolic. However, I find > it didn't create a symbolic name at all, it just execute copy > command. Could you tell me how to create a symbolic name in msys. That is correct, because native programs such as MinGW's gcc doesn't understand a symbolic link as Cygwin had architected it we changed it to do a copy. I use sysinternals' junction.exe to create a junction point instead. Maybe one day will do the same in MSYS for symbolic links of directories but that will be a long while. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd |
29 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.