Winston Marshall: “The next generation of people fighting for the truth against the conspiracy theorists: what wisdom do you have to impart to them?”
Richard Evans: “First of all, take it seriously. Address them for what they are. Tackle them head-on. Do the work. Interrogate them. Ask where they got their sources from and what they did with them. I think that’s the most important thing.”
Winston Marshall asked some good questions in his interview with Richard Evans. I particularly liked the one above, and Evans’ reply to it. I agree that the next generation should fight conspiracy theorists by inspecting sources and the use of them. Evans said rightly that “if the evidence is overwhelmingly compelling about Hitler as the man who started World War 2 as the beginning of a deliberate attempt … to take over the world … you can’t just deny the evidence.” Evidence is what we can trust more than anything else. Marshall then acknowledged, and Evans agreed, that “the history of the war is the founding story of the modern era” and “perhaps that’s one of the reasons it’s being relitigated.”
The history of the war is being relitigated like never before. 2024’s interview between Tucker Carlson and Darryl Cooper is still provoking reactions from anti-fascist historians, and Carlson interviewing Nick Fuentes in October 2025 has inflamed them further. Richard Evans, author of the book Lying About Hitler, has been called upon to dispatch these conspiracy theorists..
I object to Evans’ response to another of Marshall’s good questions, that of whether, paraphrasing Cooper, “Churchill was funded by Zionists” which Marshall said “originates with David Irving” and “is a David Irving idea”. Evans said that Cooper, building on Irving, said that Churchill:
went bankrupt and Jewish financiers and media moguls put [him] as it were back on his feet, but this is all absolute nonsense. I mean Churchill was a member of one of the richest families in Britain, the Duke of Marlborough, owners of Blenheim Palace and so on, definitely a member of the British upper classes. He did support the idea of a state of Israel, but the idea there’s a kind of huge Jewish conspiracy backing Churchill later on against Hitler [is] a classic conspiracy theory joining the dots in a way that seems to suggest one thing but it’s all built on a tissue of disinformation.
Marshall mentioned that “it was the case that [Churchill] was constantly on the edge of being broke and would then write…”, referring to articles and books. Evans agreed that Churchill, like Lord Salisbury, supported himself by writing. Marshall persisted: “it was true that he struggled with money, right?” Evans: “sometimes, yes.” Marshall: “the idea is that there was some sort of lobbying interest group that Irving and Cooper might allege were entirely Zionists…” Evans: “That’s the problem. You smell a rat any time you hear anyone talking about a Jewish lobby. That is an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory. No group in the modern world has been as divided as the Jewish community, and you can still see that today.”
Eugen Spier
The existence of a ‘Jewish lobby’ and ‘funding by Zionists’ are not mere theories. Evidence of Jews and/or Zionists funding and supporting Churchill’s political activities comes directly from Eugen Spier, co-founder of the Focus (also known as the Focus Group or the Anti-Nazi Council), and Robert Henriques, the biographer of Sir Robert Waley Cohen, who was another co-founder and the main fundraiser. Spier was a wealthy Jew who immigrated from Germany in 1922 and released the book Focus in 1963. He recounts that Churchill asked him not to publish the book until after his (Churchill’s) death.[1]Focus – a Footnote to the History of the Thirties, Eugen Spier, 1963, p13 He then describes the founding of the group in 1935 and its activities between then and 1939. According to Spier,
groups embracing members of every religious and political body were being organised up and down the country to bring help to victims of Nazi brutality. From 1933 onwards I was being continuously approached to assist in fighting antisemitism. Among those who came to see me was a Mr. A. H. Richards who sought my co-operation both in combating Hitler’s propaganda and in helping his victims. Many prominent people had already promised to help.[2]Spier, p19
Spier says that he objected to treating the Nazis as a threat to Jews specifically as opposed to the whole world. Gentiles would be difficult to recruit if not convinced that the threat was to themselves too. Spier continues:
Richards was much excited by my views. They represented, he declared, just what he and his friends were thinking, but he had not felt it wise to make his first approach to me in such terms. He had been given to understand that I was deeply affected by the sufferings of my fellow-Jews and he had therefore raised antisemitism as the primary issue. … He then disclosed the names of some of the people with whom he was associated.
To Spier’s “joy” they included Sir Winston Churchill, Lady Violet Bonham Carter, Henry Wickham Steed, Oliver Locker-Lampson, Sir Robert Mond, Sir Robert Waley-Cohen and Sir Archibald Sinclair.[3]Spier, p19-20 All were Zionists, except Spier and Richards of whose opinions I am not sure. All the funding appears to have come from Jews: Spier and Mond initially, then Cohen on behalf of others later. Churchill, the most famous person present, had already been condemning Germany in Parliament, on the BBC and in the press since soon after Hitler became Chancellor, and his inclusion in government became the particular object of the Focus’ campaigning, alongside the establishment of a Ministry of Supply and a Ministry of Information. The Focus itself was secret and would operate under other names (including the Defence of Peace and Freedom) and via front groups. Spier says that he told his wife about the Focus in confidence and that they thereafter referred to Churchill by the codename Oscar, meaning “the spear of God”.[4]Spier, p22-23 He told Churchill in 1938 that it was “one of the objects of the Focus to provide its members, and you most of all, with just those facilities which a party machine provides, publicity by public meetings, through the press and our publications.”[5]Spier, p108 This quasi-party had included Tories and Liberals from the start, and by then included prominent Labour politicians too, including Clement Attlee and Hugh Dalton who later served as ministers under Churchill. At about the same time, when the Focus took control of the League of Nations Union’s magazine Headway, Spier asserted that “Our campaign was avowedly all-party, while the policy of the new Headway would be to turn out the Conservative government.”[6]Spier, p141
Spier’s book
Recalling the origins of the group, Spier’s aims had grown: “In the meantime [1938] I had embarked on a project of my own, the evacuation of all Jews then under Nazi rule.”[7]Spier, p141 Violet Bonham-Carter prefigured the rhetoric of refugee-cum-anti-fascist activists today: according to Spier, she “had repeatedly reminded our politicians that it was the very glory of this country that British shores throughout the centuries had offered sanctuary to the oppressed and that Britain had thrown its doors wide open to fugitives and those who were persecuted.”[8]Spier, p143, 147 Refugees like Stefan Lorant (Istvan Reich), Emery Reeves (Imre Revesz) and Jurgen and Ursula Kuczynski contributed to the Focus’ cause and the promotion of Churchill, as I have discussed in previous essays.[9]About Revesz and the Kuczynskis, see my essay Champions of Judea. About Lorant, see A Conflict of Philosophies. Martin Gilbert describes Focus co-founder and lead journalist Henry Wickham Steed writing in Lorant’s Picture Post Churchill promotional issue in 1939, which Gilbert credits with helping force Chamberlain to bring Churchill, portrayed as a saviour in exile, into government. Gilbert refers to the Focus as the Anti-Nazi League. See Churchill and the Jews, Martin Gilbert, 2007, p156 Revesz’ assistance to Churchill, given specifically because of Churchill’s anti-German stance, was particularly lucrative and as helpful to Churchill as the large gifts of money he received from others.
In contrast to the members’ favourability toward Jews, co-founder Henry Wickham Steed “detested Germans in general”[10]Spier, p31 as did Robert Vansittart, the civil service head of the Foreign Office from 1930 to 1938 and a sometime attendee of Focus meetings. Steed, as editor of The Times before the Great War, had urged the government to fight Germany in 1914. Churchill also had a long history of belligerence toward Germany, as did his close friend Frederick Lindemann, later Lord Cherwell.
Robert Henriques
Robert Henriques was given access to the papers of Sir Robert Waley Cohen, his wife’s grandfather, in order to write his posthumous biography. He relates that in 1936, “Every week Bob and a few other leaders of Anglo-Jewry met at New Court”, the London headquarters of the Rothschild financial interests, “to plan a form of defence against anti-Semitic propaganda. In June, Bob, and several others had an interview with the Home Secretary and returned with the assurance that the Government would do everything in its power to arrest what it acknowledged to be “a growing evil”.” Waley Cohen was, among other things, a Vice-President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews. There was a perceived need “to find a platform which would enlist the whole-hearted support of the greatest possible number of Gentile friends.” The Focus became that platform, and
it was decided at New Court to raise a secret fund, initially of £50,000, which would work with the sympathetic non-Jewish organisations as well as with the Jewish Telegraph Agency […] Bob agreed to raise, control and administer this fund. […] Bob insisted from the start that the Jewish defence movement must concentrate on attacking Nazi philosophy and its denial of human rights, rather than on the direct refutation of anti-Semitic propaganda. … [H]e insisted that propaganda should be directed against ‘pursuing peace without caring for freedom and justice’ — a summary of the British policy of appeasement.
Robert Henriques
The same “leaders of Anglo-Jewry” later began to fund Neville Laski as well as the Focus, enabling Laski to suspend his private business as a lawyer and pursue the communal ‘self-defence strategy’, of which the Focus was another component, in his capacity as the President of the Board of Deputies.[11]Sir Robert Waley Cohen, 1877-1952: A Biography, Robert Henriques, 1966, p361-4 In terms of communal hierarchy, the Board was evidently junior to the unnamed “leaders” who regularly met at New Court.
Jewish self-defence
According to Richard Hawkins, the Focus, also known as the Anti-Nazi Council, was a continuation of the British branch of the World Non-Sectarian Anti-Nazi Council for Human Rights, started in the USA in 1934 by the wealthy lawyer and Jewish activist Samuel Untermyer and intended initially to co-ordinate a global boycott of Hitler’s Germany to effect regime change.
In April 1936, Winston Churchill joined the WNSANCHR. … In July, the Board of Deputies of British Jews created a secret fund to support anti-Nazi groups including the WNSANCHR. At a meeting on October 15, the WNSANCHR, at the suggestion of Churchill, decided to establish a Focus in Defence of Freedom and Peace movement. The Focus helped revive Churchill’s political career. As Eugen Spier later observed, ‘Later on it was easy to forget the part [the Focus] played in creating a platform for Winston Churchill at a time he was in the political wilderness.’[12]“Hitler’s Bitterest Foe”: Samuel Untermyer and the Boycott of Nazi Germany, 1933–1938, Richard Hawkins, American Jewish History, Volume 93, Number 1, March 2007, p46
Untermyer launched his boycott in March 1933. Zbynek Vydra describes it as having the goal of “terminating Jewish persecution by overthrowing Hitler” and says it “was meant to be one of the means of bringing Germany down on its knees.”[13]British Jewry and the Attempted Boycott of Nazi Germany, 1933–1939, Zbyněk Vydra, Theatrum historiae 21 (2017), p206 In Untermyer’s words, the aim of his “purely defensive economic boycott” was to “undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depend[ed].”[14]Hawkins, p31 Hawkins and Vydra, as well as Sharon Gewirtz and Daniel Tilles, have contributed illuminating work on the Untermyer boycott and the early activities of the Anti-Nazi Council and other components of ‘communal self-defence’ which came to constitute a “Jewish foreign policy” (Vydra).[15]Vydra, p212 Evidently the policy could not be effective unless it supplanted the existing British foreign policy with which it directly contrasted, hence the need to either pressure the government into adopting it or, as Spier said, “turn out” the government and replace it with one led by Churchill.
Much of the government and state were amenable to pleas from leading members of the Board of Deputies or even their relatives. Gewirtz describes Robert Vansittart meeting Neville Laski, Robert Waley Cohen and others to advise them on how best to conduct Jewish domestic policy and obtain the most from their relations with civil servants and politicians.[16]Anglo-Jewish Responses to Nazi Germany 1933-39: The Anti-Nazi Boycott and the Board of Deputies of British Jews, Sharon Gewirtz, Journal of Contemporary History, Volume 26, Number 2, April 1991, p267 Laski’s brother Harold, a leading Labour activist and a sympathiser with communism and the Soviet Union, was also able to directly lobby the Home Secretary to have the British Union of Fascists banned from conducting uniformed demonstrations.[17]“Some lesser known aspects” – The Anti-Fascist Campaign of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, 1936-40, Daniel Tilles, p138-140 and p151
In his book Twilight of Truth, which is vehemently critical of Neville Chamberlain and appeasement, Richard Cockett describes the relationship between Vansittart and Reginald Leeper and the Focus and Churchill, including having many of the same sources of intelligence. (Cockett contradicts Spier by saying that Churchill joined the Focus in 1936 at the prompting of Leeper whereas Spier says Churchill was present and active from the first meeting in 1935.)[18]Twilight of Truth: Chamberlain, Appeasement and the Manipulation of the Press, Richard Cockett, 1989, p24 Lord Lloyd, another extremely anti-German Focus member, became the first head of the British Council, an overtly “anti-fascist” propaganda initiative of Leeper’s which worked to the same purpose as the Focus.[19]Lord Lloyd and the decline of the British Empire, John Charmley, 1987, p208, 211. About the British Council’s budget, see Cultural Diplomacy and the British Council: 1934-1939, Philip Taylor, British Journal of International Studies, Volume 4, Number 3, October 1978, p244-265
Richard Cockett
Corroboration
Other historians, even if concerned to dispel anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, still acknowledge that a Jewish lobby supported Churchill for his anti-German stance. As Michael Cohen says, “When Churchill joined Focus, an anti-appeasement group formed by, among others, [Sir Henry] Strakosch and Lord Melchett [Sir Robert Mond], his political opponents spread stories that he was in the pockets of the Jews.”[20]Churchill and the Jews, Michael Cohen, 2003, afterword to the second edition Martin Gilbert, the admiring biographer of Churchill, corroborates Cockett in regard to the collaboration of Churchill, Vansittart and Leeper that centred on the Focus, emphasising their inclusion of leftists like Walter Citrine and several leading Labour MPs.[21]Churchill: a Life, Martin Gilbert, 1992, p554, p584, p596 Gilbert also makes frequent references to the Focus (under its operating name ‘Defence of Peace and Freedom’ or ‘Freedom and Peace’).[22]Winston S. Churchill – The Prophet of Truth, Martin Gilbert, 1976, chapters 36-50 He quotes Spier on the “formation and working of Churchill’s Anti-Nazi League”.[23]Churchill and the Jews, Gilbert, p xvii, chapter 12 Gilbert highlights Churchill’s remark to his son Randolph in November 1936 that
the basis of the Anti-Nazi League, which he had recently helped to launch, ‘is of course Jewish resentment at their abominable persecution. But we are now taking broader ground rather on the lines of my Paris speech.’ A Peace with Freedom committee had been formed. It aimed ‘at focusing and concentrating the efforts of all the Peace societies like the New Commonwealth and the League of Nations Union in so far as they are prepared to support genuine military action to resist tyranny or aggression.’[24]Churchill and the Jews, Gilbert, p135-6
Roy Jenkins’ strongly admiring biography of Churchill includes discussion of the “the Focus Group” and its activities in some detail.[25]Churchill, Roy Jenkins, 2001, chapters 26-28 The Focus is also described by Gerard de Groot as a “secret organisation” among frequent mentions in Liberal Crusader, his biography of the Focus co-founder and old friend of Winston Churchill, Sir Archibald Sinclair.[26]Liberal Crusader, Gerard De Groot, 1993, chapters 5 and 6. One of the chapter titles, Arms and the Covenant, was a name used by the Focus similarly to ‘Peace and Freedom’.
Archibald Sinclair and Winston Churchill
Financing Churchill personally
Having covered the evidence for direct Zionist and/or Jewish support for Churchill’s political activities, we should mention No More Champagne by David Lough, a book which, though approving of Churchill, is frank about his financial ineptitude. Evans’ remarks about the Churchills’ ancestral wealth failed to account for Winston’s tendency to overspend, gamble in casinos and speculate in shares. Lough shows Sir Henry Strakosch to be both an outstandingly generous funder of Churchill personally between 1938 and Strakosch’s death in 1943 and a supplier of intelligence to Churchill. His interest in financing Churchill appears to have been to keep Churchill in politics when he came close to retiring because Churchill was the best available champion of an anti-Hitler policy.[27]No More Champagne – Churchill and his Money, David Lough, 2015, chapters 18, 20 and 21
Lough also refers to “the American arm of [the] Focus”, a network of Jewish activists centred on Jacob Landau, founder of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. They intended to pay Churchill to visit the USA to “launch a parallel American Focus group” with speeches in major cities. The kernel was assembled; Churchill would reach out to recruit gentiles. Churchill had to cancel the trip but remained a correspondent of Landau, as he was of Felix Frankfurter and Bernard Baruch, both Zionists, Jewish activists and close advisers to Franklin Roosevelt. Eugen Spier describes Henry Wickham Steed taking a similar trip to the USA to co-ordinate with the Focus’ collaborators there in 1938.[28]Spier, p124-5 and p129. He refers to Bernard Baruch as “the most influential Jew in America”.
When Churchill became Prime Minister, British Security Co-ordination was established to support pro-war forces in the USA and vilify their opponents. In How the Jews Defeated Hitler, Benjamin Ginsberg describes Jews’ crucial roles in the American equivalent of the Focus. Quoting myself,
Ginsberg attributes the weakening and discrediting of American nationalists and anti-communists to “the relentless media and public information campaign” conducted by the Fight for Freedom Committee (FFF), the Century Group, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) and others. Ginsberg refers to the first two as a union of “Jews and members of the Eastern establishment”; both included the financier James Warburg, the founder and owner of Viking Press, Harold Guinzburg, the intelligence agent Allen Dulles and several Hollywood film producers including two of the Warner brothers. Allen Dulles was a leading member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), an overtly elitist policy group also composed of Jews and Eastern establishment figures, which was created to lobby for global governance and the largest business interests under the name of ‘internationalism’. Ginsberg says that the FFF “worked closely with British intelligence services” under the name of British Security Co-ordination (BSC) which “found in the FFF a useful ally to help them discredit America First.” The BSC supplied “newspaper editors associated with the FFF” with material to justify denunciations of American patriots as traitors and Nazi agents. Ginsberg adds that “BSC also coordinated efforts with the FFF to disrupt America First rallies”, in which they were joined by Jewish gangsters and hired thugs under the leadership of Meyer Lansky. Lansky’s involvement came at the request of Nathan Perlman of the American Jewish Congress. Soviet intelligence also benefited. The Representative from New York, Samuel Dickstein, a Jewish immigrant from the Russian Empire, campaigned for, and then co-led, what became the House Committee on Un-American Activities, which “worked to harass and intimidate Bundists and other pro-German groups.” The NKVD paid him monthly.
America’s two biggest broadcast networks, the Columbia Broadcasting Service (CBS) and the National Broadcasting Company (NBC), “embodied the pro-British, anti-German alliance between America’s Jews and establishment Protestants.” CBS was owned by William Paley, a son of Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe, and NBC was owned by the Radio Corporation of America (RCA), whose president was David Sarnoff, a Jewish immigrant from Minsk. Ginsberg adds that “their most important news broadcasters and journalists were such establishment figures as Edward R. Murrow and William Shirer.” Murrow was a protege of the arch-internationalist and director of the CFR, Stephen Duggan, and had already campaigned since 1933 for the Emergency Committee in Aid of Displaced Foreign Scholars which worked to import Jewish subversives and communists into the US from Germany. The New School for Social Research in New York was a base for many of the arrivals including the members of the Institute for Social Research, the so-called Frankfurt School.”[29]From my essay A Conflict of Philosophies. British Security Coordination was established in the early days of Winston Churchill’s government and received the expressed approval of J Edgar Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt. See British Security Coordination, William Stephenson (editor), 1999, xxv
Benjamin Ginsberg
The ‘American Focus’ thus not only complemented the work of and collaborated with the British branch but, like the British branch according to Spier, also appears to have germinated in part from activism for Jewish refugees (or ‘displaced scholars’).
Lifelong support for Jews and Zionism
David Irving’s statement that Churchill was “bought” in 1936 might be misleading if one doesn’t know (as Irving presumably does) that Churchill’s support for Jews and Zionism was already decades old before he met Spier, Mond, Cohen or Strakosch.[30]Clip from David Irving speech His intermittent reliance, since early adulthood at the latest, on wealthy Jews like Ernest Cassel (also a lavish benefactor of King Edward VII and his widow), is well-documented by Richard Davenport-Hines among others.[31]See my essay Resplendent Cosmopolitanism Also at least thirty years old was Churchill’s support for Jewish immigration into Britain, in pursuit of which he even harmed his own political career.[32]See my essay Beaconsfield Revisited
Churchill’s equally ardent support for Zionism also dated to the early years of his career. I have thus far discussed the Focus in particular, but another ‘Zionist lobby’ bore upon Churchill (and British politics in general) to largely the same effect, and partly in the same personnel. Zionists led by Chaim Weizmann, who lobbied for and facilitated Jewish immigration into Palestine, sought, like the Focus, to have the government adopt policies that promoted Jewish interests. Churchill had, since earlier in the 1930s, joined other politicians in working to support and collaborate with Weizmann’s group. As Martin Gilbert describes,
On 8 June 1937, Weizmann presented his reasoning [in regard to the prospect of partitioning Palestine between Jews and Arabs] at a private dinner given by Sir Archibald Sinclair at which Churchill was present, as well as James de Rothschild and several parliamentary supporters of Zionism: Leo Amery, Clement Attlee, Colonel Josiah Wedgwood and Captain Victor Cazalet. ‘You know, you are our masters,’ Churchill told Weizmann, and he added, pointing to those present, ‘If you ask us to fight, we shall fight like tigers.’[33]Churchill and the Jews, Gilbert, chapter 11
Martin Gilbert
Apart from the commonality of membership between this group and the Focus (Churchill, Attlee, Sinclair and Rothschild), note that the leader of the Liberals, the leader of Labour and its next prime minister, and the next Tory leader and prime minister were all militantly servile toward the Zionist cause. Once Chamberlain was cleared away, Zionists would have near-total control of British politics, at least at the level of party leadership.
Churchill’s contribution
I have been concerned here with the historicity of the Focus. I have discussed it in detail and in context in my earlier essays.
Champions of Judea
Churchill himself contributed nothing to this history, simply avoiding all mention of it in his tomes, consistent with his letter to Spier asking for secrecy unto death. Evidently he saw the Focus as a conspiracy from the start, one aiming to frighten the public, which Spier credits it with doing, and “turn out the Chamberlain government”, institute a “Jewish foreign policy”, ally with the Soviet Union and “bring down Germany on its knees” regardless of the cost. I have shown, with reference only to undisputed sources, that the Focus was a Jewish and Zionist lobby (in addition to Weizmann’s group) which assisted Churchill in becoming prime minister, seeing him as an instrument (‘the spear of God’) for Jewish interests, operated in secret and worked successfully to install Jewish interests as the main concern of the British government and state.
Doing the work
Anti-fascist historians may well believe that all this was to the good, but that is a different argument. Professor Evans dismissed the idea of Jewish or Zionist lobbying or backing for Churchill as a conspiracy theory, yet there are abundant, and mostly laudatory, accounts attesting to it. If you insist on denying all this, Professor Evans, tackle the evidence head-on, as you counselled. Tackle Martin Gilbert and Robert Henriques. Do the work.
Notes
[1] Focus – a Footnote to the History of the Thirties, Eugen Spier, 1963, p13
[2] Spier, p19
[3] Spier, p19-20
[4] Spier, p22-23
[5] Spier, p108
[6] Spier, p141
[7] Spier, p141
[8] Spier, p143, 147
[9] About Revesz and the Kuczynskis, see my essay Champions of Judea. About Lorant, see A Conflict of Philosophies. Martin Gilbert describes Focus co-founder and lead journalist Henry Wickham Steed writing in Lorant’s Picture Post Churchill promotional issue in 1939, which Gilbert credits with helping force Chamberlain to bring Churchill, portrayed as a saviour in exile, into government. Gilbert refers to the Focus as the Anti-Nazi League. See Churchill and the Jews, Martin Gilbert, 2007, p156
[10] Spier, p31
[11] Sir Robert Waley Cohen, 1877-1952: A Biography, Robert Henriques, 1966, p361-4
[12] “Hitler’s Bitterest Foe”: Samuel Untermyer and the Boycott of Nazi Germany, 1933–1938, Richard Hawkins, American Jewish History, Volume 93, Number 1, March 2007, p46
[13] British Jewry and the Attempted Boycott of Nazi Germany, 1933–1939, Zbyněk Vydra, Theatrum historiae 21 (2017), p206
[14] Hawkins, p31
[15] Vydra, p212
[16] Anglo-Jewish Responses to Nazi Germany 1933-39: The Anti-Nazi Boycott and the Board of Deputies of British Jews, Sharon Gewirtz, Journal of Contemporary History, Volume 26, Number 2, April 1991, p267
[17] “Some lesser known aspects” – The Anti-Fascist Campaign of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, 1936-40, Daniel Tilles, p138-140 and p151
[18] Twilight of Truth: Chamberlain, Appeasement and the Manipulation of the Press, Richard Cockett, 1989, p24
[19] Lord Lloyd and the decline of the British Empire, John Charmley, 1987, p208, 211. About the British Council’s budget, see Cultural Diplomacy and the British Council: 1934-1939, Philip Taylor, British Journal of International Studies, Volume 4, Number 3, October 1978, p244-265
[20] Churchill and the Jews, Michael Cohen, 2003, afterword to the second edition
[21] Churchill: a Life, Martin Gilbert, 1992, p554, p584, p596
[22] Winston S. Churchill – The Prophet of Truth, Martin Gilbert, 1976, chapters 36-50
[23] Churchill and the Jews, Gilbert, p xvii, chapter 12
[24] Churchill and the Jews, Gilbert, p135-6
[25] Churchill, Roy Jenkins, 2001, chapters 26-28
[26] Liberal Crusader, Gerard De Groot, 1993, chapters 5 and 6. One of the chapter titles, Arms and the Covenant, was a name used by the Focus similarly to ‘Peace and Freedom’.
[27] No More Champagne – Churchill and his Money, David Lough, 2015, chapters 18, 20 and 21
[28] Spier, p124-5 and p129. He refers to Bernard Baruch as “the most influential Jew in America”.
[29] From my essay A Conflict of Philosophies. British Security Coordination was established in the early days of Winston Churchill’s government and received the expressed approval of J Edgar Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt. See British Security Coordination, William Stephenson (editor), 1999, xxv
[30] Clip from David Irving speech
[31] See my essay Resplendent Cosmopolitanism
[32] See my essay Beaconsfield Revisited
[33] Churchill and the Jews, Gilbert, chapter 11
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
English
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Yep, you don’t need to be Wernher von Braun to realize, that if you adopt a ‘holy book’ or religion created by Jews (Bible/Christianity), then you will naturally become the slaves of Jews. Now you know brah.
A.A.
930
They’re not divided in their support for the Judeofascist state, and never really were. Any jew who opposed Judeofascism simply walked away forever.
The Western world was divided in its support for the Nazis, but not jews when it comes to the concept of a Judeofascst state. Even their stooges on both the left and the right don’t oppose the concept of a Judeofascist state; they just differ on whether it should be internationalist and less identifiably and less obviously jewish, or if it should have an identifiable headquarters, flag, lobby, interest, agenda etc.
These Marxist-Zionists are too clever, coy, arrogant and evil by half.
BTW, Moses, the Prophets, and Christ were all “antisemitic”.
http://www.judeofascism.com/2010/09/god-is-anti-semite-anti-jewish-polemics.html
That’s why Christendom was, is and will always remain antisemitic.
Morgan Jones, I am not familiar with your name or any of your previous output.
But this article of yours was well worth reading.
It is yet further confirmation, not that we needed any, that Winston Churchill was the stand-out traitor in the history of the British Empire.
Churchill sold his soul to the Jewish financiers (and simultaneously bankrupted the British empire, whilst needlessly sacrificing the lives of countless hundreds of thousands of British and Commonwealth soldiers for nothing).
Great Britain had no dog in this fight. It should never have involved itself in this war – a war whose sole purpose was the advancement of the agenda of Malignant International Jewry.
Yes. Today’s Judaism did not start in the Old Testament before the arrival of Jesus on Earth. Judaism as we know it today began when Jesus was rejected by the Jews as the Messiah as written in the Gospel accounts. That is the foundation of Judaism and the hatred of both Christianity and Jesus. True Christianity is by nature antisemite because Judaism is satanic as Jesus said when he called the Jews who rejected him Satan’s children.
A new YouTube channel has begun posting translations of Hitler’s speeches. I don’t know if they are accurate, but they make Hitler sound reasonable. This channel might be taken down as “antisemitic”.
Declaration Of War On Poland In ENGLISH. 1939, SEPTEMBER 1.
Video Link
At least there has been movement in media circles, the so-called conspiracy theorists have now got a response from the mainstream.
The problem, the enemy now has, is: “how is the Zionist owned media going to combat misinformation?”
They’ve tried ignoring “conspiracy theorists,” laughing at them, even set up their own “fact checking” outfits, nothing has worked.
They haven’t tried stopping the dumbing down of the populace, no they won’t stop that.
The “elite” just want to stop the conspiracy theorists talking, period.
The criminal “elite” want to shut conspiracy theorists up because they’re having an effect.
We now see legislation being introduced to stop “anti-Semitism”, which is an oxymoron because the people claiming to be Semites aren’t Semites.
Be prepared for more draconian measures by the criminal class, they’ve enslaved us through money printing, our efforts go to their wealth and privilege and they will not give that up.
As for fleeing Hitler, the Jews weren’t the only targets of Hitler, Klaus Fuchs and many non jews of other political or religious flavours had to flee, its just the jews are the loudest using the megaphones that money buys to make the most noise.
The money used against us was stolen off working people through the likes of Churchill and other of the old European ruling order and recycled through the provision of vice, by the jews, to the aristocracy of old europe, then the money was used to buy, lock stock and barrel the elite.
Old Europe aristocracy (criminals) then provided a facade, a platform of legitimacy, for Jewish interests so the “elite”, like Churchill, could keep their privileged position with Jewish “bail out” money.
The Zionist have planned long ago a method to get out of the ghetto, where criminals were kept, and create their criminal paradise.
If Christians want to combat this evil they must treat the likes of Churchill, Trump and Lindsay Graham as proto Zionists and stop supporting and listening to their lies.
TY for this enlightening essay. And in extension:
Churchill was by-inheritance a familial Zionist tool from the beginning. His father – Lord Randolph Churchill, an “early admirer of Disreali” and 2X short-listed for Tory PM – was a compulsive gambler, drinker, and womanizer, and repeatedly ran up large amounts of debt…..which the Rothschild Zionists from time to time paid off via “extensive loans”. Eventually he died of syphlis at age 45 and passed the mantle to Winston. Who, tho running up huge gambling and drinking and other estate debt – which the sources documented in this essay took care of – did not womanize and hence died in comfortable old age, replete with honors and ecomiums. Here’s one of my favorite WC anecdotes:
“In June 1915 I returned to London after witnessing the attacks on the Dardanelles….With some friends I went to Ciro’s, a famous nightclub, for dinner. At a nearby table sat four gentlemen in impeccable evening dress. One I recognized as Winston Churchill, the other as F.E. Smith, later Lord Birkenhead, and two others unknown to me. They were talking loudly, drinking great goblets of Napoleon brandy. Champagne bottles in nickled buckets spotted the floor around the table. Churchill, face red, eyes shining, talked and gesticulated. One of the negro band approached to ask if the diners had any favorite bit of music they wished played…..Churchill flew into a temper. He cursed the darky loudly. Accused him of listening to the conversation of the group, called the head waiter and demanded that screens be placed around the table and generally made an ass out of himself. As I watched Churchill I though of those soldiers abandoned on that bleak promontory in Turkey – half-starved, crazed with thirst, living in mud and filth under an unending rain of shell, rifle and machine-gun fire, death beside them like a shadow. And here amid lights, glitter, replete with delicious food, drunk with champagne and brandy, sat the author of their misery….Winston Churchill.” (Granville Fortescue, Front Line and Deadline, Experiences of a War Correspondent; NY, 1937, pp. 157-158)
you mean like the kabbalah, upon which crowley based his whole schtick? i guess you’ve become a slave of the jews. do you consider yourself to be a shabbos goy, or does your slave status make you a shklaf? you should be careful playing around with that jewish supremacist black magic, you might hurt yourself.
Thanks. Eric Larson’s Splendid and the Vile tells a similar story about the young Churchill set, out to the wee hours partying at white tie affairs while their fellow Brits were being put through hell on earth because of Winston.
Larson also mentions that Winston and his wife Clementine kept separate bedrooms, and on p. 30 that:
What a collection of degenerate, psychopathic swine.
Evans is the worst of the Whores to Zion.
Hell will welcome him soon.
Churchill may have in fact been a fanatical Zionist. His testimony at the Peel Commission in the pre ww2 Palestine Question hearings could have been delivered by the likes of Huckabee or Gingrich. He hid it under the bluster of a British Imperialist type quite nicely for public consumption. But it is obvious behind closed doors he was a true believer in the 1930s.
https://www.palquest.org/sites/default/files/The_Secret_Testimony_to_the_Peel_Commission_Part_I-_Underbelly_of_Empire.pdf
What may have snapped Churchill out of it was to have Irgun assassinate Walter Guinness, Lord Moyne.
Churchill was all for war in 1914. He was wildly enthusiastic about it. He bears a huge amount of responsibility for the decline of Great Britain.
In 1953 ,that fuck faced barbarian , sent troops and gunboats to Britsish Guiana to depose the democratically elected govt of the great Cheddi Jagan, under a constitution that the British themselves imposed……of course, communism was the excuse.
Forgetting that it was the Russian Communists who saved his ass not even a decade earlier.
Churchill and his ilk were the true Nazis……the Nazis actually implemented the very tyranny on Eastern Europe that the British and other europeans practised on a world wide scale, and the American on the Natives of North America
What in the world are you talking about? You’re being sarcastic, right? The Indian Cheddi Jagan was a puppet of his wife, Janet Rosenberg, a truly hideous communist Jew from Chicago, using the desperately poor, mainly black African people of Guyana as guinea pigs in the Jews’ war against the West.
The first president, Forbes Burnham, was a favorite of the State Department and UN crowd, a quintessential third-world thug who promised jobs for everyone without mentioning they’d be working the coastal sugar plantations and bauxite mines up the Berbice River seven days a week as slaves. Burnham was famous for taking white liberals from the US and Europe horseback riding on Guyana’s beautiful beaches near Georgetown while Guyanese behind the Potemkin villages set up by the American left were dying like flies from his policies.
What a total nightmare to befall the poorest country in South America, last I checked, to be enslaved in turn by an Afrocentrist, white-hating thug like Burnham, on the one hand, and then by a negro-hating Indian-Jewish couple, the Jagans, basically leftists from the same Chicago mishpuka that gave America “Obama” many years later.
I can’t recall offhand which Western aluminum company ran the bauxite mines up the Berbice River, except that the communist paradise didn’t pan out when, after communists expropriated the mines in the name of the people, the Guyanese forgot that mining equipment, especially in dense tropical jungle settings, needs lots of expertise and maintenance.
But, we’re Americans, not Guyanese, and our focus should be on identifying and prosecuting every last liberal bastard in the State Department or working for the UN who’s still living whose “good intentions” have caused so much human misery in a country rich with natural resources, including gold, but so desperately poor. It’s been some years, but I recall that the tribes upriver are so poor they’re befouling the land with cyanide in the hope of finding some gold.
Richard Evans three part Third Reich history, 1: Coming of 2: in Power, 3: At war.
Parts one and two are not too bad.
Part three jews jews jews. how WW2 was all about jews. methinks his sponsors insisted he do pt 3 that way.
Churchill was an alcoholic fool, criminal and butcher. addicted to booze and gambling the good life for himself. on the zionists payroll.
Bucks Fizz with breakfast etc, as recounted in his diaries.
Its a pity Michael Collins didn’t do the world a favor by assassinating Churchill in 1919. bad Micky.
Its a certainty the Brits had Michael Collins assassinated in 1922 as revenge for winning the war..
Absolute garbage from you. Better acquaint yourself with that period’s history of British Guiana before your spout your CIA propaganda and outright lies.
Talking of the CIA, are you aware what they did to Guyana?
Are you aware that the only instance(maybe Chile after) that there is documented evidence of a President giving the ok to destroy a democratically elected govt(again Cheddi Jagan in 1964)
Take a hike with your junk, dog and all
Btw, who kept Burham in office all those years after bringing him to power?
Maybe you should read The West on Trial by Cheddi J
Spot on..Christianity is the main reason the west is fucked. Nothing else.
And fuck Churchill. He is the 2nd biggest reason the west is fucked. He stood against the one man who could have saved mankind -Hitler.
Pretty much agree. Part 1 — The Coming of the Third Reich — I recall as pretty good.
Part 2 — The Third Reich in Power — got a bit predictable. ‘Nazi agricultural policy was a failure. But — mysteriously — German farmers liked the Nazis anyway.’ Repeat for all segments of the German populace. Never worked, no sirree. Yet for some reason, everyone was happy. Go figure.
Part 3 — ‘The Third Reich at War’ — was, as you say, all about the Jews. It was appalling. History reduced to a catalogue of Nazi atrocities. You know, there were other aspects to the war. Really. Tens of millions died otherwise, societies were transformed, etc. In particular, an analysis of how Nazi Germany was able to make such a convulsive national effort — and keep at it long after all real hope of victory had vanished — would have been appropriate.
The guy likes to vilify David Irving. I agree Irving has his weaknesses. But he’s head and shoulders above Evans.
The maddening thing is: on the one hand the zio propaganda is slick, nimble and can adapt to the times. Many people don’t know that they are being manipulated.
On the other hand, we have Bari Weiss, a middling talent whose sudden elevation to the head of CBS News has set off alarm bells around the world. Here is an obvious takeover of a news organ by the Zionist lobby.
We can take heart in the fact that perhaps the Zionists are as dumbed down as the rest of us, and all their ongoing efforts will be as hamfisted and transparent.
So, these people who are anti Churchill are pro Neville Chamberlain and support his policy of pushing Germany eastwards to destroy Russia? Is that it?
Not sure what their stance is.
“…the British Conservative government had reached the fantastic idea that they could kill two birds with one stone by setting Germany and Russia against one another in Eastern Europe.
In order to carry out this plan of allowing Germany to drive eastward against Russia, it was necessary to do three things:
(1) to liquidate all the countries standing between Germany and Russia;
(2) to prevent France from honoring her alliances with these countries; and
(3) to hoodwink the English people into accepting this as a necessary, indeed, the only solution to the international problem.
The Chamberlain group were so successful in all three of these things that they came within an ace of succeeding, and failed only because of the obstinacy of the Poles, the unseemly haste of Hitler, and the fact that…”
https://web.archive.org/web/20221029210347/http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/quigley/anglo_12b.html
http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm
Churchill was anti appeasement as opposed to pro appeasement of Chamberlain.
So if you are anti Churchill, you are pro Chamberlain and pro appeasement? Is that it?
LOL
They control the money source, therefore…
http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2015/07/28/how-the-ashkenazi-jews-conquered-the-west/
Boy that’s a lot of dots. And not one demonstrates the most significant point . . .
1. that a single check given to support PM Churchill landed came from a jew
2. that if said check did come from a jew that it was the only source of financial support
3. that PM Churchill was uniquely beholden to the said support enough to go to war
4. PM Churchill opposed Chancellor Hitler and the Nazi Party, the Nazi Party was engaged in persecuting jews, so the jews supported PM Churchill there’s no evidence that PM Churchill attacked Germany to stop jewish persecution nor appease jewish bankers. Just because two people are going the same hill and help each other along the way — does not mean they are climbing the hill for one orthe other — but rather mutual interests.
All in all this is mighty weak tea.
I was watching a program about Mr. Sy Hersh today. It’s an eye opener. I appreciate Mr. Hersh’s diligence. But I found over extending what his stories say about the incidents and the country. He treated My Lai as aha moment, which might have been to the public. But what he really stumbled on was an ongoing investigation into the events of the My Lai incident. There already been an arrest and others to follow. It was not as if if not for the reporting there would have been no investigation. The work is valuable, but the extended editorial is debatable.
Uncovering that jews gave money to help prosecuted the war — a war in which jews were being persecuted. Hardly is evidence that the war was about the jews. It was known in Great Britain, in fact most of the world before 1939 what Germany was doing and no one sought to prosecute a war against Germany on that cause. This is guilt by association and the association ignores a host of other associations that were nogt jewish.
https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/debunking-the-myth-of-the-two-jewish
The primary source of funds seems to come from
https://alchetron.com/Henry-Strakosch
Are we allowed to call 80% a majority?
If so, when these 80-percenters are wholeheartedly cheering on the wanton slaughter of Palestinian men, women and children, the world watches a heavily divided Jewish community…?
American give away
Immigration from
English giveaway
Emigration from
> Churchill’s support for Jews and Zionism was already decades old before he met Spier, Mond, Cohen or Strakosch.
Where do you get this claim that Henry Strakosch was Jewish from? As far as can be found, he was Austrian.
this article is one big bait and shift – they werent doing this, they were doing something else entirely different. ok, sure. but now look where we are 81 years later, and my have things changed, its wall to wall white extinction in every western country. oh dear how did that happen
There would be no West and no Western Civilization, if not for Christianity and Christians. There were the ancient Greeks, who were first incorporated into Western thought via Christian neo-Platonism. Christians never regarded Jews (sorry, Mr. Crowley, the Commie/Jews) as their masters, with exception of problematic figures like Churchill, who I suspect, was never a Christian. Even present-day Evangelicals, on whom Israelis and Crowley’s own masters in Tel Aviv are politically dependent, seek conversion of modern-day Israelis and Jews to Christianity.
look at the demographic breakdowns of the under twenty population segments of the western countries – if you can find the data. what data you can find – its a complete disaster for whites.
dont blame jews, churchill and the focus group – blame the invisible lizard people. personally lm quite content to blame hitler – but at least he had one very large redeeming quality – he was pro white for the most part as opposed to anti white. for the last 81 years most ‘powerful people’ have been unashamedly anti white. to confound matters most ‘powerful people’ lurk in the background – invisible and anonymous as it were – but theyre still there working their ‘spells’, and here we are rapidly approaching minority status IN OUR OWN COUNTRIES
Facts: hitler wanted german land stolen by versaille. He tried to free germany from ever and always nefarious degenerate, vice peddling kikes. Britain declared war on germany. Churchill, the drunken, retarded kike owned loser of galipoli wanted revenge. The good guys lost ww2 and there is now no way to deny this. Enjoy your kikeocracy and dream of what could have been.
ChatGPT query:
ChatGPT response:
ChatGPT query:
ChatGPT response:
All these groups and individuals, or rather their descendants, are still in power today. These termites are burrowed into the structures of power. Their ideology is the basis for our culture and politics. This is the Nuremberg regime.
They won. We lost. We eat their dogfood. They destroy our ethnos and impair our cognition with propaganda.
I listened to a podcast today from a pollster that queries Gen Z. The good news: they are radical, and the boomers are dying off.
Gen Z is disposed the burning it down, metaphorically speaking of course.
Burn it down, only way to kill the ticks.
Search: J. Burdon Show – Hard Times Hard Facts with Mark Mitchell
“There would be no West and no Western Civilization, if not for Christianity and Christians.”
“Civilization?”
Henry Strakosch descended from Jews who converted to Christianity. The source for that is Marie-Theres Arnbom’s book Friedmann, Gutmann, Lieben, Mandl und Strakosch: Fünf Familienporträts aus Wien vor 1938.
I’ve commented before on this subject here and here.
At that time I relied on second-hand sources. I now have the book, but haven’t read it. Next, I’ll post a few passages selected more or less at random to complement my past comments.
The chapter on the Strakosch family begins on page 105. On that same page, the author begins talking about Henry’s paternal ancestors. They lived in Butschowitz, a Jewish community in Austria. In the next page, she writes, about one of Henry’s great-great-uncles (machine translated from the German):
Upon this quick search inside the book, I haven’t found anything on Henry’s mother side; my own search results are in the second comment linked to above, which is part of an exchange with a hostile commenter (possibly a great fan of Arthur Butz, whose article is debunked by Arnbom’s book).
Another excerpt from Arnbom’s book (again, machine-translated):
(p.118)
ZIDSO is an ancient conspiracy consisting of a tight relationship between dozens of interlocked Jewish/Zionists communities active in every corner of the globe.
Not every Zionist is a Jew. Not every Jew is a Zionist. But every Jew is a Jew!
The Zionist International Deep State Oligarchy requires the services of a cadre of maintenance men whom are bound to their masters like ancient bondsmen—these men are not necessarily Jews but their fealty is assured by the access ZIDSO provides for them to acquire the goods and services men of no conscience desire and lust after.
Almost every statesman whom the majority of people look to for protecting their interests are groomed chattels. Historically, the term was used to describe enslaved people, viewed by their masters as property—something obviously inhumane—to whom the enslaved become indentured and whom are readily discarded by their masters should they fail to perform up to expectations.
Do not envy the powerful or the rich or the influential. Stay out of their way.
Churchill has been dead and long gone, thus, no sense beating the dead horse. Move on!
And here we are all these years later with Trump openly praising his Zio overlords at every opportunity. How the world has changed and not for the better.
FE Smith wasn’t a homo. Probably not a Zionist either. The man could be the subject of a very interesting film about Anglo Irish relations. Smith was an arch Unionist and Top Lawyer.
When Michael Collins signed the treaty FESmith quipped “I’ve just signed my political death warrant” and Collins replied “I’ve just signed my death warrant”. The two men were correct.
Another example of the wit, when a high court judge sought out FESmith’s legal advice on sentencing a homosexual “what ought I give a man for allowing himself to be buggered?” FESmith said “ “Oh, thirty shillings or two pounds; whatever you happen to have on you.”
Smith would have been a good Prime Minister himself if he’d laid off the drinking binges. Massive physically imposing Rugby player, rapier wit. If he’d been the contact man with Germany in the 1930s war might never have happened at all.
What I was getting at is this, that the Americans of whatever agency or working for the UN who were responsible for Guyana should be prosecuted if still alive and if they can be identified.
The Anglos won the big one. And now it’s all come home to roost. The West is being screwed by the misnomered victims, the Jews, who have thanked Angloland destroying their societies. Anglo enslavement is the result of their arrogance and self-assurance. Zionism hit the jackpot in Angloland. And the latter on the way to being no more – just a polyglot of people.
“his inclusion in government became the particular object of the Focus’ campaigning”
Churchill, The Gathering Storm
All the shit going on in the world is precisely down to the sinister deceitful Anglo Saxons and their European cousins, still essentially barbarians, nothing changed in five hundred years
There were more than two options, but a war against Soviet communism was far more important than a war against Germany’s National Socialists. Germany only sought to regain territories lost in WW1. The Soviets were gobbling up nations, murdering priests and imposing starvation on the populations under their control.
David Irvine was the historian who revealed Dresden, just one of Churchill’s war crimes and yet another black mark on the record of the British. The similarity is striking; Churchill was happy murdering civilians, his Zionist keepers have proven to also have the same hobby. The sad thing is that Churchill was a loser in the same way as the Israeli IDF fighters are losers, lost in the brainwashing of Zionism. Can you imagine what it is like being born into a cult where all you are taught is bullshit? No wonder they have a suicide problem. Churchill was the same; born into a once successful family only to realise that he did not have what it takes to keep that legacy going; so he begged from the money changers.
Irvine tells us how he obtained his information, who he interviewed etc. The Zionists just blast us with repeat lies.
Yeah, got to wonder how the Chinese did it without a jew god.
This means that you are more aligned with Neville Chamberlain.
From diary entry of Herbert Hoover, 15 May 1945:
“…Kennedy agreed with me that the Germans were a land people, that they had given up the possibility of sea conquests, that they had built up a land army for expansion purposes, that they knew they could not spread out to the West and that they had determined to expand into the Balkan States and Russia. Chamberlain knew this and Kennedy said that Chamberlain’s whole idea, despite Roosevelt’s promises, was to keep hands off and to let these two dictators fight it out between themselves…”
–in: Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover’s Secret History of the Second World War and its Aftermath, ed. George Nash (Stanford CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2011), pp. 827-29.
https://dn720001.ca.archive.org/0/items/freedom-betrayed-herbert-hoovers-secret-history-of-the-second-world-war-and-its-/George%20H.%20Nash%20-%20Freedom%20Betrayed_%20Herbert%20Hoover%27s%20Secret%20History%20of%20the%20Second%20World%20War%20and%20Its%20Aftermath.pdf
https://archive.org/details/hoover-freedom-betrayed-2011/mode/2up
Jun 10, 2020 Winston Churchill: Hero or villain?
To many he will always be known as the man who helped inspire the allies to victory in WW2, but some question other parts of his legacy.
Video Link
Mar 4, 2022 5th March 1946: Winston Churchill describes the Iron Curtain in his ‘Sinews of Peace’ address
Churchill, as the British Prime Minister, had led Britain to victory in the Second World War but suffered a landslide defeat to Clement Attlee’s Labour Party in the General Election of July 1945. Despite being in opposition he continued to be highly respected abroad and visited the United States in 1946.
Video Link
Cuffy you strike me as a real commie scum and stop hiding your poor ass under “he was elected democratically”
Matt, Mr. Crowley never says anything that makes sense. Just ignore him.
Even for you Sir Crowley, that is one of the most ignorant statements you’ve ever made – it’s become entertaining to observe willful ignorance to that degree – keep at it – I need the laughs –
http://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2025/08/seeking-reality-while-navigating-sea-of.html
Thanks
I wonder how long it will be before Danzig again becomes part of Germany
Because, unless the fake Jews can totally wipe out the German people, someday Danzig will be German again.
Well, of course Churchill supported the Zionists. He was a first class Brit!
I think that if the warmongers in Britain hadn’t paid off and given war guarantees to Poland, the Poles would’ve made a deal on Danzig and the war could have been avoided.
“The farther backward you can look, the farther forward you can see.” – Winston Churchill
Why do you want to deny this from us?
Martin Armstrong said that the normal person just wants a steady income, is willing to work, wants to feed his kids and raise a family, and lead a normal life with a roof over his head, food on the table, and have some time off for a holiday.
The preoccupation of wealth extraction, wealth transfer, and “getting rich” is the focus of a small minority. It is the elites, those of political, financial, and economic influence that start wars, create conditions for war, and continue wars.. It has always been this way; desire for war never comes intrinsically from the people. They gain nothing – in fact just the opposite.
The Iraqi Wars alone cost 3 trillion dollars. 1 trillion would update and shore up all America’s infrastructure such as bridges, roads, public works, etc.
Speaking of the “Focus,” Sir Harold George Nicolson KCVO CMG (21 November 1886 – 1 May 1968) was a British politician, writer, broadcaster and gardener. His wife was Vita Sackville-West, the best selling novelist and lesbian lover of Virginia Wolf, among others. He wrote 35 books, was a member of the Foreign office, an Oxford graduate and later a member of Parliament and a friend and colleague of Winston Churchill.
In 1938 Harold Nicholson he attended a meeting of The Focus Group with Winston Churchill, which he described in a letter to his wife as follows in a collection of his letters and diaries edited by his son, Nigel Nicholson. This letter from Harold Nicholson to his wife, Vita Sackville-West was dated March 2nd, 1938 and states as follows:
“I went to such and odd luncheon yesterday. It is called ‘The Focus Group’, and is one of Winston’s things. It consists of Winston, Norman Angell, Wickham Steed, Walter Layton, Robert Cecil, Violet Bonham Carter, Clynes and some other of the Labour people. I was made to make a speech without any notice and was a trifle embarrassed. But one gets a thick skin and an easy habit about these things and my speech was rather a hit. Winston was enormously witty. He spoke of ‘this great country nosing from door to door like a cow that has lost its calf’, mooing dolefully now in Berlin and now in Rome–when all the time the tiger and the alligator wait for its undoing.’
“Don’t be worried my darling. I am not going to become one of the Winston brigade. My leaders are Anthony [Eden] and Malcolm [MacDonald].”
Nicholson, Nigel, Ed., Harold Nicholson, Diaries and Letters 1930-1939. Atheneum New York, 1966. pp. 327-328.
Reply
You are accurate about misallocation , but USA cannot turn overnight and create the supply chains and skilled workers to build bridges , power plants , factories
It is a multigenerational challenge but the sooner we start the better
See Walmsley inside China Business YouTube and Substack
I agree in principle. But I believe it is intra-generational, within 25 years. We are talking about repair and refurbishment. OTH, Amurka needs high speed rail yesterday, and a 10 year benevolent dictatorship to clear away the traitors, foreign agents, saboteurs, dead wood, and revamp the educational system on par with China and Russia.
I’m still unclear as to the point of this article, current thinking being it wants the reader to come away thinking “Yes, it was Jewy but not as Jewy as all that. FOCUS! A bright shiny object!”
read, “churchill’s war” by David Irving
I have a quibble with this. WWI had put the British Empire on the track to bankruptcy. Churchill accelerated process rapidly with his treachery. WWII created the gangster capitalism that has spiritually and economically impoverished the West.
The dumbest shite EVER! Hitler in ENGLISH???? You stupid Yanks can’t handle sub-titles, can you?
Hee, hee-you’re decades BEHIND China and will NEVER catch up, which is why you are planning aggressive war and turning the Taiwan Province into another Ukraine.
Yeah he won the first election held under adult sufferage…. long bf Allende.
Explain your problem with “elected democratically”. Dont understand the” commie scum” insult.
Guess you are in line with some who labels everyone Communist…Obama, Biden, Clinton, Starmer etc
Only a very stupid person without shame can openly espouse such asinine tripe
He was reasonable. Churchill wasn’t.
VILLAIN!! The USSR won WWII in Europe, Churchill knowingly killed several million in the Great Bengal Famine, and by 1946 the West was actively planning to nuke the Soviet Union in ‘Operation Unthinkable’, plans for which were ordered by Churchill in May 1945, aimed to ‘..impose upon Russia the will of the United States and the British Empire..’. A MONSTER.
I haven’t listen to the speech but what I do know is that the extermination of Polish Christian population started on day one of the invasion, incidentally with immolation of a little girl. Julian Bryant, an American photographer, was on the ground and captured the carnage (eg strafing civilians for fun) and the aftermath. A few days after the National Socialist Reich invasion, their ally, the USSR, jumped Poland in the East, and started their mass murder. Hitler and Stalin held a victory parade in Brest-Litovsk. For Hitler, Slavs were worth of enslavement and extermination, and the terror targeted priests, nuns, academics and people in positions of responsibility first. The Ukrainian battalion SS Galizien contributed horrifically to this. Many a barn was burnt with people locked inside. The Soviets took a million men, women, and children to Siberia, standing room only. The doors to carriages were occasionally open to remove the standing dead and throw out the infants. A concentration camp for children as young as 24 months was established in Litzmanstadt. Thousands of kids were trafficked to Germany to be placed with families there. Polish Christians were treated abominably but described as “observers” by certain historians, because there was only ever space for one victim. Post 1945, communists from the East continued the terror.
In his book The Nameless War , Ramsay, who was one of those locked up by Churchill for opposing the war, makes two important points:
1) “appeasement” was/is a misnomer as Slovakia had declared independence; and
2) the “guarantee” to Poland was made based on false information given to Chamberlain.
https://archive.org/details/the-nameless-war-archibald-ramsay-1952
Some argue that Germany pressured Slovakia. that may be true, but doesn’t change the fact that the declaration was made.
thanks….have a look at ” a thousand days in the whitehouse”….by Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.
see what the Yanks thought of Jagan and how they viewed the racist CIA thug(Burnham). Guess who became their darling?
As well, your comment about Janet Jagan (nee Rosenberg, the first American born woman to become the President of any country, guess we wont hear about that) was unfair.
She was a warm and wonderful woman who the majority of Guyanese called Bowgee(sis in law)
She was not religious, but born guilty,to many contributors on the UR, I suppose
One thought all this raised in me: what about Mers el Kebir?
That was Winston’s idea, and of course whatever the rationale, it was fairly clearly intended to destroy all prospects of peace. Of course in turn the assumption is that this would be for Britain’s benefit; but were Britain’s interests considered at all?
Maybe it was intended purely and simply to stave off German victory — to ensure that somehow, some day, Nazi Germany would be destroyed? Never mind whether that would actually do Britain any good.
They were 100% accurate…Its the kikes and anglo-zios that have smeared Hitler because he and his Aryan Nordic-Teutonic kinsmen and women were the only one’s for at least the last 125 years to stand up to the kike and his machinations…Its that simple…
ZIDSO never rests. Ever! There is not a society anywhere on planet earth where the Zionist International Deep State Oligarchy is not at work. Their network of interacting agencies with myriad acronyms is a spiderweb. Suppose there is a vibration somewhere on the outer reaches of the spiderweb, ZIDSO goes immediately to work to contain the threat that the tiniest vibration represents to ZIDSO’s hegemony.
Governments are subservient to ZIDSO. So many institutions exist—large and ever so tiny—into which ZIDSO installs an agent, a watchman or a watch-woman, who reports through an agency of ZIDSO anything which can be labelled *anti-semitic* thus triggering hundreds of, say, letters to the editor by hundreds of normally quiescent Jews whom write nothing about Jews interventions which serve their purposes but immediately respond if a Jew transgresses and is therefore reported as having done so, claiming *anti-semitism* is the cause of the accusation rather than the transgression itself being appropriately targeted.
Clearly they are agents of ZIDSO who declared Sunday a shopping day rather than a day of rest. Notice though that Jew owned businesses are wide open on Saturdays—their supposed day of rest! Jewish authors and publishers argued that the vile stuff some of them wrote ought not to be censored because of free speech yet anything revelatory of Jewish perfidy ought to be censored!
Jews were deeply involved in the slave trade—both financing at arms length and investing directly in all the institutions of slaving. But, Jews blamed white southerners for perpetuating that “peculiar institution” which Jews were instrumental in promulgating. Certain Englishmen and Englishwomen raised the conscience of their Christian communities to circumscribe and prohibit the practice of slavery, especially as was apparent to them—in all the worst manifestation of tawdry mercantilism.
Yet in the 1960 it behooved Jews—in their own interests—to agitate for the integration of those they had captured and enslaved for hundreds of years in Americas formative years. Did Jews in the 1960s or ever since the 1960s ever admit their complicity or express any regret for their participation?
Not that I ever heard, but they never fail to distance themselves from their involvement in the slave *trade* while blaming the white southerners for its perpetuation. Jews agitated for the Blacks in South Africa to agitate against apartheid. However whom were the principal shareholders in the companies mining the reef for diamonds and gold around Johannesburg?
The gold rush led to the eventual Boer defeat in the Second Boer War (1899-1902) This led to total British rule in South Africa. Again though, it was British men who died securing the wealth of South Africa for the Jews. Little known Glencore mining tycoon Ivan Glasenberg, a Jew, is by far the wealthiest tycoon in South Africa.
But of course it was the ordinary British soldier who was conscripted as being handmaiden to the Jews stealing the resources from the Boers. There are places in the world where citing these events and the Jews involvement in stealing the resource wealth is anti-Semitic!
ZIDSO is hard at work in Canada! Their puppet in Canada is Mark Carney. He is now instrumental in encouraging direct foreign investment from overseas capital into Canada to exploit the resources the average Canadian will never benefit from *allowing*—hah!
Mark Carney is the designated hitter ZIDSO employs to ensure compliance from Canada. He is a smooth operator. Of course the designated hitter in the U.S., the president, Donald Trump has been bought body and soul to encourage subservience to ZIDSO there.
ZIDSO says jump and Donald Trump, not missing a beat in ZIDSO’s band, just as Mark Carney was installed in Canada by the interventions of ZIDSO, began threatening to take over Canada by the United States. Mark Carney was seen as the saviour! …And still is.
Jewish talking heads can be found encouraging Canadians to believe Canadas resources are far more valuable than Canadians realize. Of course investments in Canada’s ports and resources will not be screened for foreign control over them. Carney’s works diligently behind the scenes to do the bidding of ZIDSO in return for participating by owning assets controlled by ZIDSO.
The acronym ZIDSO—the Zionist International Deep State Oligarchy—says it all! It will take an international body of informed citizens in every country on the planet to countervail ZIDSO.
The Jews whomever they claim to be, are not for the most part a Semitic people. They have appropriated the explicit evil assumptions that the Israelites are cited in the Bible as promoting as a justification for, say, exterminating the true Semitic people in Palestine whom stand as witness to the theft of their heritage by ZIDSO.
ZIDSO is an evil! Their love of money and the material accruements and baubles that only money can buy has been given the gloss of what is in effect a false god with only temporary or temporal benefits.
Somewhere recently a pundit in Canada suggested that non-Jews were jealous of them. Their “contribution” is what? Historically they contributed only violence against civilized behaviour. Most of what is called civilization has not been contributed to by Jews.
Most of the contributions of genuine human advancement have been made by men living in North Western Europe, men declared as Christians. Christian practices were always anathema to Jews. Societies in Europe managed to contain Jewish perfidy. But the discovery of the Americas’ gave Jews an almost impossible to contain freedom they had not know for thousands of years.
They practiced their perfidy for centuries, so to say, in the dark. We can witness them in Ukraine at present a front line for further Jewish malfeasance where Jews have lined up millions of acres of the rich fertile soil of that benighted country they intend to steal from the ethnic Ukrainians and Russians while harnessing the taxpayers in countries like Canada to give Zelinski $2.5 billion of Canadian taxpayers money to continue the prosecution of a war only to which only ZIDSO will profit.
Who supports this sort of evil? The Jews in the United States run the show. They provide an almost bottomless supply of money they then use to advance ZIDSO’s interests.
The ridiculous performance of the present puppet is so transparent one can see the strings. Puppett master Netanyahu has shown up in the White House and Congress on what has become a regular occurrence to make sure puppet Trump’s strings manipulate the hand that opens up the U.S. treasury to provide the funds with which to build the armaments used by Jews in the United States to perpetuate their mad obsessions where ever U.S. power can be made useful to ZIDSO’s ends.
At bottom language and language construction is a means of conveying meaning. Can a language be hijacked? Can a language be subverted? Can language be subjected to analysis and thereby be deconstructed and reconstructed and then clothed in something like a garment which camouflages the original meaning while suggesting something which appears the same in outline but hides the reconstruction from being observed.
Of course the means is at hand. Interests of one kind or another are continually subverting the meaning of language.
Christianity, seen as a language by those opposed to its subversion, had a powerful medium of defence against interests which would pervert it. As a language its meaning was clear. Its iconography was clear. The entire Christ is born among those whom have missed the mark story had imbedded in it a metaphor few misunderstood. The Greek word for sin translates as “missing the mark”—who cannot understand that one and all miss the mark. Christianity was a language constructed to convey a subtle message. One can do better!
And the language included another idea—forgiveness, i.e., tolerance for others conceived in the corollary that one may be, in turn, forgiven.
There is much more that can be said about the positive influence of Christianity. But over time language needs to be relevant. Language attached to superstition and dated metaphors gradually dies. Its enemies assault it—its friends are conservative to a fault, hanging on to ceremony, while failing to transform or interpret the meaning behind the metaphor. We are asked to believe!
Of course Jews employ a more durable set of metaphors! Their ideology is unmistakably and transparently opposed to Christianity. Christianity easily succumbed to their ridicule. Common language subverts christian truths by Jews mockery of outdated metaphors.
ZIDSO’s attack on Christians includes burning their churches. Includes using Christmas images in commercial guises. The gifts of the Magi, which in Greek means “wise men” becomes Santa Claus. Tin Pan Alley in the 1950s churned out catchy songs so similar to contemporary pop tunes they were easily absorbed into what appeared in the 1950s to be the dominant culture. Jews tried had to have Christmas made into a mere holiday—for a while Christians were chanting “Happy Holidays.”
Of course Jews did not want Christian theology updated. The last thing Jews wanted was to have church goers hearing the truth and the facts about Jews.
Adults do not want to be seen displaying angels on their desks at Christmas time. Adults stood by and agreed that Christmas parties should be binned as outdated celebrations of a non existent event they could not verify or defend. Jews made out that the Christ story was something serious adults should not believe. Metaphor is much more easily defended. But Christianity refused to refresh the story.
So what is now a secular society without metaphor which Jews deplored as unfriendly to Jews has succumbed to their debasement—the debasement of the Christian language and its metaphors—while Jews celebrate their imagined superiority by exterminating the Palestinians and waving their flag in the United States in rampant triumphalism of their evil over common decency.
The Zionist/Jews meanwhile, in cahoots with the hundreds and thousands of ignorantly complicit Jews, and the millions of ignorantly complicit secular humanists—whom the Jews have coerced into giving up their humanity, are happily engaged as I write these words in deploying violence against anyone standing in the way of their triumphalism.
Our leaders are nothing less than murderers and killers and destroyers. Everything these people touch turns to shit.
Trump has been the single greatest gift for establishing the fact of our Zionist Occupation. At least Churchill understood that he was engaged in a shamefully traitorous conspiracy, which had to be concealed from the public. Trump simply makes a speech stating that he has sold our nation for a couple hundred million paid by dual citizens directly to Trump.
The NYT hate Trump with a passion and torched their credibility with fake claims that the Russians helped him with a few thousands dollars worth of Facebook adds. Yet when he give the MSM and the Dems an absolute lay up admission that he’s 100% bought by a foreign government. . . . crickets. Thus, anyone with two neurons to rub together can see that Zio-treason is the SOP for both wings of the Uniparty.
“ZIDSO” is now on the list along with (((blahblah))), City of London, Perfidious Albion, Synagogue of Satan, and cuck. I know a lot of ladies have problems with the sound of “moist” so that’s added to the list in solidarity.
What do these horrors tell you, in general? What theme and truism?
“….not going to become one of the Winston Brigade. My leader (is) Anthony Eden….”
now that’s amusing: Eden was – along with the crypto-Jew Leo Amery (maternal line: Saphir) – one of WC’s top hatchet men. For instance, in January 1941, WC sent Eden and several MI6 agents to Athens in an attempt to strongarm Greek leader Metaxas (who, even after defeating Mussolini’s aggression remained on good terms with Germany) into accepting British military intervention. Over dinner, Metaxas said….”no thanks, not needed”. A few hours later he died of a mysterious “blood infection” i.e., poisoned. The Brit-puppet successor regime then “requested” Empire troops and aircraft, which shortly thereafter arrived…..Hitler winced but temporized. Thus encouraged, Churchill then overthrew the Berlin-friendly regime in Belgrade, replaing it with a murderous cabal of Serb generals. Only then did Hitler counter-strike into the Balkans.
Churchill 2.0…
He is no different than most heads of state controlled by the Central Bankster’s around the globe.
You are ill informed. When you have thoroughly studied the history of money creation as well as the history of events including the context within which money creation plays such an important role, historical events will appear much different.
True, though understanding money requires first that you accept that most likely you do not understand it. It’s an extremely peculiar thing to understand.
“Christianity is the main reason the west is fucked. Nothing else.”
The “main reason”? . . . “Nothing else”? The West has been ruined because of its own hubris, endless colonization into regions of the planet it had no right colonize, perpetual wars throughout the Middle East, its adherence to racial equality and multiculturalism, including a steady stream of 24-hour degeneracy in television and movies.
Western nations have largely fought against the best interests of their own people, often in favor of foreigners and third-world migrants.
Much of this has been the result of Jewish cultural and political subversion, but much of it is due to the stupidity and complacency of its low-information populations who had multiple opportunities to remove the shackles of their elected tyrants, but never did. As they always do, Jews subverted and parasited their host nations, and these same host nations gladly allowed it to occur.
Actually, it was BECAUSE the West turned against historic and credal Christianity that Europe and America morphed into the moral cesspools that they now are.
And the so-called Christianity that emerged was nothing like the original. It simply bought into the very same doctrines and worldview of the secularists, the sodomites, and the Jews.
The uninformed look at modern-day ‘Christianity’ and wrongly assume it’s the same thing that Christ Himself established in the first century. But there are vast differences in both doctrine and practice.
It was NOT Christians who promoted 24-hour streaming porn. It also wasn’t orthodox Christians who encouraged gay parades, the LGBTQ nonsense, liberalism, cultural Marxism, and all the other degrading influences that have plagued the West.
Yes, Christians have largely accepted multi-racialism and multiculturalism, but that is more or less a modern thing. It’s the result of the Church accommodating the false spirit of the age rather than being faithful to the teachings of God’s Word.
I have no idea what you are trying to convey. Perhaps if you took the time to think through what it is you want to convey before typing like an automaton you would not sound so illiterate.
Some gratuitous porn with Mr. Pope Francis
https://static-cdn.toi-media.com/www/uploads/2014/05/Mideast-Pope_Horo-1-640×400.jpg
Thank you for posting this. I was not aware of the British murder of the Greek leader and the cynical undermining of neutral governments. Of course the British & USSR jointly invaded and occupied Iran. I did know of that. Could you site some sources for your material. I’d like to read more on this.
Can you please state your thesis up front, so that I can follow your argument? I am about 3-4 paragraphs in, and I can’t even tell what argument you are trying to set up. Having to 2nd-guess what I am supposed to think about each argument means I’m having a combinatorial overload already. If you state your thesis, I can evaluate what you THINK about each source statement (e.g.) and then evaluate whether I agree. Reading this article is worse than trying to solve a puzzle where there not even any guarantee that the pieces fit together.
Oh, and please add a short intro about what this is all about. Just a short description about what this is all about in the first place. The article should have some legs to stand on.
Thanks.
That’s an interesting and critical slice of WWII history.
Exceedingly unlikely. At most, the commencement of the war would’ve been postponed by a few months, or perhaps a year.
Malignant International Jewry was ALWAYS going to conjure up a set of circumstances to destroy Germany, be that through a False Flag or whatever.
You see, the German economic miracle came about because Hitler had extricated his nation from the financial orbit of the ZOG bankers in the City of London.
And, no longer subject to usury and financial exploitation, Germany prospered mightily.
The NUMBER ONE priority of Malignant International Jewry was always the demise of Hitler’s Germany. Everything else on the agenda was subordinate to that.
WWI did indeed put the Brits ‘on track’ for bankruptcy.
But despite that debacle and the profligacy in that war, Britain still had [at the beginning of WWII] considerable holdings of gold, it still possessed various strategic and valuable overseas possessions other than India.
You need to watch the 20 min video below and educate yourself to the degree that the U.S looted the British Empire during WWII:
Video Link
As for your Socialist-inspired falsehood that:
…. the reality is that the west was impoverished because Capitalism was abandoned.
A functioning Capitalistic society is based on:
1) Minimal Gubmint
2) Negligible taxation (recall that there were NO income or corporate taxes levied in America before the near simultaneous creation of the ZOG owned Federal Reserve and ZOG controlled IRS).
3) A Sound Money system (ie: the Gold Standard).
4) Negligible Gubmint micromanagement of the lives of the citizenry
5) Negligible (if any), foreign entanglements/wars of aggression.
(After all, if the Gubmint has negligible revenue at its disposal, a consequence of minimal taxation, than it can only get up to so much mischief in terms of foreign policy fiascoes).
Beginning with the Marxist sympathising traitor FDR in the 1930’s, Gubmint grew like a cancer.
Then, under the tenure of LBJ (the first Jewish President), with his Great Society/Guns and Butter profligacy on steroids, Gubmint metastisised still further.
Simply put, when America was as close as any society had been [in all of recorded history] to being a Capitalistic Free Market libertarian utopia (ie: the 130 or so years from the founding of the republic until the creation of the ZOG owned Federal Reserve on the eve of WWI), the U.S became the richest nation on Earth.
Since then, it has been inching incrementally to where it is today – a Socialist shit hole.
The U.S today is infected with Crony Corporatism. ie: Socialism for the rich, whereby Gubmint legislates/mandates/introduces regulatory impediments that prevent new entrants from seeking market share, and thus protecting the monopolies of the Jewish oligarchs.
That is NOT Capitalism.
So Mudge, stop reading the leftist/Jewish propaganda leaflets of yours that have brainwashed you into believing that Capitalism is the culprit in America’s demise.
The reality is the exact OPPOSITE.
Surely one of the greatest Greeks of the C20th. Veteran of the Greco-Turkish War of 1897 and the Balkan Wars (1912–13), he also tried to keep Greece out of the horrific “Great” War.
His “NO” to the Italians…actually…Wikipedia:
showed the depth of his patriotism.
There was no need for Hitler to rush to attack Poland in the first place. What’s the hurry?
Britain offered Germany Polish corridor and Danzig in August 1939. Hitler should have taken up the British offer.
“…During three days of talks, the businessmen dutifully repeated the official British line that the guarantee to Poland still stood; yet they seemed to have gone beyond that stance in suggesting that Germany could obtain “financial and industrial prosperity and the lebensraum she had been seeking”, if only she did not actually invade Poland. This could be effected, it was suggested, through a new four-power conference, attended by Chamberlain, Hitler, Mussolini and the French Prime Minister Edouard Daladier, with the status of the Polish port of Danzig and the disputed Polish Corridor at the top of the agenda…”
https://web.archive.org/web/20180813175408/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1421186/Lord-Aberconway.html
“…If, by means of another Munich, he could have obtained a German-Polish settlement that would satisfy Germany and avoid war, he would have taken it. It was the hope of such an agreement that prevented him from making any real agreement with Russia, for it was, apparently, the expectation of the British government that if the Germans could get the Polish Corridor by negotiation, they could then drive into Russia across the Baltic States. For this reason, in the negotiations with Russia, Halifax refused any multilateral pact against aggression, any guarantee of the Baltic States, or any tripartite guarantee of Poland…”
https://web.archive.org/web/20221029210347/http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/quigley/anglo_12b.html
http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm
The British idea was that if Germany annexed Polish corridor and Danzig, the German army could invade across Baltic states and attack Russia.
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/thefutureofeuropes/images/1/1c/Map_of_Europe_1939.png
Chamberlain’s idea was to let Germany and Russia fight it out and destroy each other. UK won’t intervene in the war. I think you are also in agreement with Chamberlain.
Thank you for this quote from a war correspondent👍
There was absolutely no need for Hitler to invade Poland except maybe he felt that if given time, the Poles would be able to build up better defenses. I’ve read that Mussolini had urged him to wait another year but I’d never heard of the British offer you reference. I was always under the impression that the Soviets would have lost if not for American and British opening a Western front the Germans would have had a better chance to win against the Soviets. More recently I’ve come across historians who say the Red Army was much stronger than those in the West knew and they not only would have defeated Germany, but would have taken all of Western Europe if the Allies hadn’t secured France and Western Germany.
I think he’s Mossad or closely related, and would like him off the site. I have been hoping Ron Unz would see this.
Maybe you’ve heard of this guy:
Birger Dahlerus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birger_Dahlerus
You might also be interested in this:
“…The efforts of the Chamberlain group to continue the policy of appeasement by making economic and other concessions to Germany and their efforts to get Hitler to agree to a four-power pact form one of the most shameful episodes in the history of recent British diplomacy.
These negotiations were chiefly conducted through Sir Horace Wilson and consisted chiefly of offers of colonial bribes and other concessions to Germany. These offers were either rejected or ignored by the Nazis…”
https://web.archive.org/web/20221029210347/http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/quigley/anglo_12b.html
http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm
Documents And Materials Relating To The Eve Of The Second World War II. Dirksen Papers Vol. II ( 1938 1939)
https://archive.org/details/documents-and-materials-relating-to-the-eve-of-the-second-world-war-ii.-vol-ii-
See my comments at 196, 205, 263, 266, 343, 346, 383, 388, 405, 437, 488, 518, 535 here for more on origins of WWII also:
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-charles-a-lindbergh-and-the-america-first-movement/
It’s a list of words that are used by people who use words on that list. Those people are called “jewcucks”. The list is a living document, growing as jewcucks latch onto new words to become totems of jewfear, like the homos did with “gay” and “queer”and “assless” and the blacks did with “nigger”. Friends don’t let friends (((say))) in the Synagogue of Satan in the Freemasonic City of London.
I don’t know if I want white America to remember or forget that every jewcuck who cries “pilpul” ultimately only learned about it from a summer reading list book they may or may not have read, My Name is Asher Lev by Chaim Potok. It’s like that The Nation article Mr. Unz mentioned recently as the urquelle of some internet myth being touted by Lady Teetheforeanasse.
To take Hitler Table Talk as an example, his idea was to let christianity die a slow death on its own over time, as populations would wake up to the lie that it is. The culture would be increasingly based on honesty, eventually reflecting this in all aspects of that society. There would be no room for it, people would eventually realize what it really is, and it would be exposed and self evident as the nefarious jewish creation to destroy Whites that it was originally intended to do.
That’s right
To take Hitler Table Talk as an example, his idea was to let christianity die a slow death on its own over time, as populations would wake up to the lie that it is. The culture would be increasingly based on honesty, eventually reflecting this in all aspects of that society. There would be no room for it, people would eventually realize what it really is, and it would be exposed and self evident as the nefarious jewish creation to destroy Whites that it was originally intended to do.
Winston never lied, he told you everything and left it out there warts and all.
This video might clarify the issue for you:
Video Link
LOL. That appears to answer the question without any doubt. That is the first time I have read it explicitly said that Strakosch was Jewish, although his funding of the war monger Churchill suggests that.
Berlin-friendly? … murderous cabal of Serb generals?
Perhaps you should learn something about WWII rather than spouting all that nonsense.
Too bad that Ron did not get rid of you [1].
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[1] Comment # 233 under American Pravda: Propaganda-Hoaxes vs. Chinese Reality, by Ron Unz – The Unz Review
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-propaganda-hoaxes-vs-chinese-reality/?showcomments#comment-6907151
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1000+ Anon001 Comments Archive @ The Unz Review | TUR
https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=anon001
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That Arnbom book looks like a valid source, though my German is so weak that I probably won’t bother with getting it. But from the description it does seem to address the issues. I would never rely on Chat for something like this, because Chat can be too easily influenced by whatever the talk of the town is at the moment. But Arnbom’s book looks like it’s at the proper grade.
> possibly a great fan of Arthur Butz, whose article is debunked by Arnbom’s book
Butz did raise the issue back here in this piece:
https://ihr.org/journal/v21n1p-9_butz-html
—–
Strakosch died near London on Saturday, October 30, 1943, and The Times (London) published a long obituary on November 1, eulogies on the second, and on the fourth a report of a memorial service for Strakosch. It was clearly a Christian service, held at St. Michael’s, Chester Square.
Thus Strakosch died a nominal Christian. That does not exclude the possibility that he was partially of Jewish descent or converted from Judaism, but neither David Irving nor anybody else has been able to provide hard evidence in that respect…
The Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971) mentions two Jewish Strakosches, but not Sir Henry (it also mentions one Jewish Irving, but not David). If a Jew, or someone of partial Jewish descent, or a Jewish convert to Christianity had played such an important part in the background to the Second World War then it would seem that the Encyclopaedia would have at least mentioned it.
—–
I noticed the same thing in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. It contains entries for Alexander and Maurice Strakosch, but no Henry. That seems to be accounted for by Henry Strakosch being half-Jewish on his father’s side and apparently converting to Christianity somewhere along the way. Perhaps the Arnbom book will eventually go through an English translation.
“too bad Ron did not get rid of you”
too bad “anon001” can’t face facts.
and it’s now 4,100+ comments, most of them – like this one – 100% substantive: the 1940-41 Balkan sequence is precisely as I stated: first Mussolini’s attack on Greece, then Churchill – who never missed an opportunity to escalate and widen the war – overthrew the Athens and Belgrade regimes, only after which Hitler struck back. Specifically, re your objections to “Berlin-friendly” and “Serb Generals”:
the Serb “coup d’etat took place on 27 March 1941 in Belgrade….planned and conducted by by a group of pro-Allied Serb nationalist Air Force officers led by General Dusan Simovic (and) and General Borivoje Mirkovic. The Communist Party made a significant contribution to mass street protests in (Serbian) cities that supported the coup. The putsch deposed the government of Prime Minister Dragisa Cvetkovic. Two days earlier….the Cvetkovic government had signed the Vienna Protocol committing Yugoslavia to the Axis Tripartite Pact. The coup had been planned for several months, but the signing of the Axis Pact spurred the organizers to carry it out, encouraged by the British Special Operations Executive. The coup then led directly to the German invasion of Yugoslavia in April….”.
via http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_coup_d’etat
Not only a MONSTER, but also from a family long known to be lackeys to the throne.
Which throne, far more than any other institution, always manages to come almost specklessly clean.
Pope (and to some extent most of us Christians) is as Christian as Judas and Lucifer himself.
As almost all today’s Hebrews are NOT God’s chosen people but Satan’s synagogue.
And better not mention Islam at all.
Good point! Doesn’t the Iranian Salman Altmani reputedly own ChatGPT? Perhaps we should look to more objective sources to obtain a more disinterested assessment of Strakosch‘s heritage, huh?
Excerpt from The Jewish Chronicle’s Churchill and the Jews:
https://www.thejc.com/life/churchill-and-the-jews-q6qshjft
‘ title=’https://www.thejc.com/life/churchill-and-the-jews-q6qshjft
‘ >https://www.thejc.com/life/churchill-and-the-jews-q6qshjft
Excerpt from YNets’ Churchill was not an anti-Semite:
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3376884,00.html
‘ title=’https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3376884,00.html
‘ >https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3376884,00.html
Patrick ‘Shlomo’ McNally writes:
No, in fact. The exact opposite is true.
These ZOG controlled entities would go out of their way to HIDE THE FACT that Churchill was owned lock, stock and barrel by Malignant International Jewry.
Case in Point: Let’s take you ‘McNally’, by way of example.
You’re as Anglo-Celtic as Matzah balls. We all know you’re HIDING behind an Anglicised pseudonym to deflect attention away from the fact that you have a Talmudic dog in this race.
(‘McNally’s’ real name is something along the lines of Mordechai Moshe Baruch Shlongstein).
I imagine Hitler had the good peasant common sense to realize Poland would never agree to any such thing. Poland wasn’t Czechoslovakia; for one thing, it was full of Poles.
So why fuck around? His only miscalculation was assuming France and England would shy away when it came to actually pulling the trigger and declaring war.
I am fully aware of all of FDR plotting the dismantling of the Empire so that the US could take it over.
I used the term “gangster capitalism”, which started in earnest with the creation of the Federal Reserve Banks. They and their investment house spin-offs are communists seeking to concentrate power and wealth in the hands of a few, little different than the Politburo of the USSR.
Less Gubmint? Capitalism started with government interference before the US existed. The craft guild system, which controlled the means of production and was completely intertwined with local economies, was dismantled to allow capital to take it over. The trade guilds were not affected other than by being able to take over the means of production and separating it from local economies.
Socialism? What form? Anarchism? I suggest you do some homework on socialism. Co-ops are socialism. Credit unions are socialism. The State Bank of North Dakota is socialism.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/pierre-joseph-proudhon-the-state-its-nature-object-and-destination
You’d think the man had never even heard of AIPAC.
Video Link
Mudge writes:
What purpose would that serve?
It would just be going over old ground that I’d covered countless times before.
The reality is that I have an excellent grasp of what Socialism constitutes.
Unfortunately, I can’t say the same for those that are advocating for Socialism – the vast majority are clueless halfwits.
And, in relation to your dubious claim that ‘Capitalism started with government interference before the US existed’, it appears that you don’t even know what capitalism is.
The latter is all about:
1) Voluntary exchange
2) Freedom to transact without Gubmint interference/meddling/mandates/distortion of the market.
3) The citizenry not having their lives micromanaged by Gubmint busy-bodies, thus allowing them to pursue an existence of THEIR choosing – provided it does not infringe on the Life, Liberty and Happiness of others.
So, to the extent that there may have been some Gubmint interference before the creation of the U.S, this would’ve HINDERED CAPITALISM.
Absent this Gubmint meddling, there would’ve been greater prosperity still.
> Doesn’t the Iranian Salman Altmani reputedly own ChatGPT?
Even if such a bizarre statement were true, it’s not the main issue. There’s a wide variety of claims which can be plausible but disputable, and which float around in very different sources. For example, the Khazarian thesis was accepted by Arthur Koestler and John Beaty, while rejected by Revilo Oliver. Obviously, there is no “Jewish” side in such a dispute. It’s the same way when there is a dispute between David Irving and Arthur Butz over Henry Strakosch’s background.
> Patrick ‘Shlomo’ McNally writes:
Here’s mental retardation in live action. I quoted a statement from Arthur Butz which you misattribute to me. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
@Patrick ‘Shlomo’ McNally
It matters not that Arthur Butz made that statement.
What matters is that you’re using his remarks to bolster your deceitful assertion that Henry Strakosch (Churchill’s sugar daddy and financial benefactor before and during WWII), was not Jewish.
As always Shlomo, you’re deceitful, deceitful, deceitful.
Despite it being your idiocy that led me to do the reading it seems clear that Strakosch was a Christian though with Jewish relations and that he had a gold bug’s opposition to Hitler and his economics. Just to rub in your idiocy you use the expression “sugar daddy” to describe his relation with Churchill which is a ridiculous pejorative description of his providing critical finance to Churchill at critical times.
The expression ‘sugar daddy’ is absolutely appropriate when describing the Jewish financier Henry Strakosch and the exorbitant sums of money he threw the way of the ZOG sock puppet Winston Spendthrift Churchill.
There’s nothing idiotic about telling the truth.
Wizard of ZOG, you should try it sometime.
(Preferably before you croak. Which is not far off in your case – seeing as you’re nudging 90).
You are describing the anarchist version of socialism, which you would have understood had you read the link I provided.
You are conflating commerce with capitalism. Commerce has existed for millennia with or without government constraints. Capitalism is the acquisition of capital to control government, which is what every so-called Western liberal democracy is inflicted with today. No political system, and capitalism is a political system, is perfect. They are all flawed.
Commerce is Capitalism and vice versa.
(ie: commerce that is not hindered by the micromanagement of Big Gubmint, one where the citizenry have the LIBERTY to decide things for themselves).
Under Socialism these liberties are taken away.
Socialism is all about GUBMINT COERCION.
Mudge, you have much to learn. You can start here: Mises.org
Get back to me once you’ve received a modicum of education on the matter.
Meanwhile, listen carefully to the 8-9 minutes of audio only in the clip below (from 14:45-23:30), and see for yourself that Socialism was tried in the Plymouth colony in early 17th century America – and see how that worked out:
Video Link
If commerce were capitalism, why did the term not arise before the 19th century? Capitalism is directly tied to fractional reserve banking which was at one time, impermissible.
Anyone that believes in the Mises propaganda is in deep doodoo.
Jumpin’ Jesus man. If anarchy is socialism, and it is, how can it be about GUBMINT COERCION?
Capitalism has shown itself to be ownership of government i.e. your “socialism” for the rich.
The socialists in the farmer co-operatives have been complaining, for decades, about government interference through the support of Big Ag, destroying family farms.
At one time, before politicians became political whores, they were pragmatic. Now they are mouthpieces for their donors – the 1%.
CumOnMudge writes:
Fractional reserve banking is a distortion of Capitalism.
But, for all its faults, fractional reserve banking (as long as not overdone), works well enough in a Sound Money system.
You see, if bankers ever got too greedy and lent out/created loans well in excess of their holdings of hard money (gold and silver), a bank run could develop and they’d get caught out quickly and likely go bust.
That’s what the Gold Standard does. It ensures CONSTRAINT.
It ensures that the bankers don’t overdo it with excess Fractional reserve profligacy.
Not so in a Fiat Monetary system – as we witnessed first hand during the Gubmint/ZOG conjured 2008 GFC.
When banks and other financial entities (eg: AIG, General Motors, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) became technically insolvent, the Gubmint bailed them out with freshly conjured trillions from the Fed.
Ron Paul and the libertarians were shouting from the rooftops that there should be NO BAILOUTS of the business (((entities))) that got into trouble from their recklessness.
In other words: NO Socialism for the rich.
It was YOUR leftist* pals that bailed out their mates in the financial industry and elsewhere.
(*Both Dubya Bush and Obama were leftist Big Gubmint meddlers in the market).
It matters not that Bush had an (R) next to his name.
He was a RINO (Republican In Name Only) like Donald J Chump is today.
Both presided over tenures that were awash with fiscal and monetary profligacy.
You also write:
What the hell is wrong with you?
I’m an anarcho Capitalist. How can I simultaneously be a Socialist?
Just because those Marxist textbooks equated marxism with Socialism, it does not make it so.
One can be an anarchist in a libertarian/capitalist context (which means there is no CENTRALISED monolithic gubmint barking out orders and 5 year plans, but instead small communities decide matters for themselves in a LOCALISED context).
Or one can be a Marxist/socialist anarchist – in the manner that Lenin was in the Russian Revolution or the warlords in Mogadishu Somalia were, as they roamed the streets with 50 cal machine guns mounted on the back of their Toyota pick up trucks enforcing the law of the jungle.
In other words by threatening/brutalising/murdering those that oppose your agenda.
This is how Socialism/Marxism always plays out in the final analysis.
Libertarian/capitalist anarchism occurs in the context of VOLUNTARY COOPERATION and mutual win-win exchanges – free of Gubmint coercion/mandates.
You CLEARLY do not know what ‘anarchism’ means in a political context.
I will educate you in a later message I post, as this one has already been long enough.
One last thing before I go, in relation to your stupid assertion about Mises wisdom being ‘doo doo’, only an ignorant leftist could make such an uninformed statement.
Dr Ron Paul (and his son Rand, Congressman Thomas Massie, Dave Smith and it’s safe to say Col. Douglas Macgregor – as well as countless others of unquestionable integrity), these are all individuals that have learnt from and give the highest praise towards libertarianism/Capitalism and the wisdom found at Mises.org
This is what Col. Macgregor had to say about Dr Ron Paul some months ago (watch the minute or so from 1:30-3:00):
The people I’ve mentioned above are some of the highest calibre people you’re likely to cross paths with in two lifetimes. FFS, Dr Ron Paul is THE GREATEST LIVING AMERICAN.
Seriously, is there anyone remotely close to Ron Paul (as far as wisdom on foreign policy/economic/social matters) over the last 50 years?
It’s blue sky to second place.
So big mouth, let’s hear it. I’ve NAMED NAMES.
I’ve provided the names of those individuals that advocate for unfettered Free Market Capitalism in a libertarian society.
And of course libertarianism is all about the Non Aggression principle, and thus goes hand in hand with a PEACEFUL foreign policy and a cessation of these endless wars.
So let’s hear the names of those individuals in your ‘movement’, those people that offer a solution to the ills facing present day America.
What political party do you find agreement with? Either put up, or STFU.
I hear a ton of comments from nitwits in UR that say stuff like:
‘libertarianism won’t work’ and ‘Dr Ron Paul, if he was successful and became Prez in 2012, would not have fixed anything’,
…. in other words, just mud slinging and criticising for the sake of criticising.
But NEVER PUTTING UP AN ALTERNATIVE or giving names of the present day thought leaders* of their movement.
(*My guess is that you were a ‘Bernie bro’ not that many years ago. But when you found out he was a GUTLESS cuck and puppet of the ZOG miscreants, you gave up on him).
The libertarians meanwhile, we ALWAYS knew he was a worthless piece of shit, that Bernie Sanders was an economic illiterate (just like you Mudge).
I simply pointed out that the matter was in dispute without claiming any specific judgment of my own. The reference given by Bras Cubas does help to clarify the issues which Butz was raising. Strakosch appears to have been ethnically half-Jewish on his father’s side but a convert to Christianity who was then drawn into the anti-Hitler movement for reasons which both most Jews and many Christians agreed with. As Butz pointed, the character of Strakosch’s funeral would give no reason to think that he was at all Jewish. You certainly did not produce any evidence to imply that he was. It was BC who found something relevant.
At the end of the day, it matters not whether Henry Strakosch was a was a full Jew, Halbjude, a crypto-Jew, a lapsed Jew turned Christian convert or just a garden variety shabbos goy like a John McCain or the pederast Lindsey Graham.
What does matter is that Strakosch was the go-between (acting on instructions handed to him by the ZOG elders), that BOUGHT Churchill’s obsequious loyalty.
(The money Strakosch gave to Churchill almost certainly was given to him by that cartel of Talmudic financiers that controlled the western financial system, through ownership of the U.S Federal Reserve and the Bank of England).
The important thing is that the Jewish banking cartel FULLY CONTROLLED Churchill (in the same manner as they controlled FDR).
And thus the conduct of WWII from an Anglo-Zionist empire perspective, was all about fulfillment of the Zionist agenda.
And that meant only one thing.
ie: the destruction of NSDAP Germany and Hitler (no matter the cost/loss of empire/bankruptcy or number of gentile boys that needed to be sacrificed in the process).
As promised Mudge, this is Part II – your education about ‘anarchism’ as used in the context of Libertarianism and unfettered Free Market Capitalism (none of which is occurring in the USSA today – hence the reason for the impoverishment of so many).
Here are the benefits of anarchy – as told by the well respected libertarian Ryan McMaken:
And that’s why I am an anarcho-capitalist. Because that’s a system which yields maximum prosperity for all demographics of society.
Meanwhile, you desperately need to read this article by the great Doug Casey titled ‘Anarchy and Voluntaryism’, which explains why the state, as we know it, needs to be abolished forthwith:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/01/doug-casey/anarchy-and-voluntaryism/
You should take note of the following paragraph taken from the link above:
And that’s it in a nutshell. THE STATE IS COUNTERPRODUCTIVE.
Mudge, once you learn some real economics, you too will have that epiphany.