chaos-devel Mailing List for The chaos Operating System
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
sf_hal
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(139) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
(1) |
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
From: Per L. <pe...@gm...> - 2006-11-04 14:28:57
|
dusan halicky wrote: Hello Dusan, thanks for your interest in chaos. > I found your operating system CHAOS on the sourceforge.net page and I > am interested in it. I am in the development team which creating > in-kernel GUI for Linux for embeded systems > (http://home.comcast.net/~fbui/index.html). We thinking about abandon > linux and find another, better kernel. Is the "chaos project" still > alive? Is it actively developed. What do you think abou porting FBUI > onto chaos? Awaiting any suggestions... I can't really recommend chaos for this unfortunately. The system isn't actively developed and maintained. Of course, this doesn't prevent you from using it if you like. The kernel works to a certain extent and can certainly be used; new features that you need would have to be added by you but if you a skillful programmer, that shouldn't really be impossible if you just have the time. But for the moment, don't count on anyone else contributing to chaos right now. There was some activity on the mailing list last Spring and early Summer but it all seems to have been brought to naught. :-) Lack of people willing to invest time and a committed project leader is what the project currently lacks IMO. -- Best regards, Per Lundberg |