US20040178454A1 - Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge - Google Patents
Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040178454A1 US20040178454A1 US10/384,714 US38471403A US2004178454A1 US 20040178454 A1 US20040178454 A1 US 20040178454A1 US 38471403 A US38471403 A US 38471403A US 2004178454 A1 US2004178454 A1 US 2004178454A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- diffusion
- semiconductor device
- diffusions
- drain
- source
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 65
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 166
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 45
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 31
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000005669 field effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 12
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 abstract description 8
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 7
- 229910021420 polycrystalline silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000011229 interlayer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920005591 polysilicon Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003071 parasitic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003685 thermal hair damage Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L23/00—Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
- H01L23/52—Arrangements for conducting electric current within the device in operation from one component to another, i.e. interconnections, e.g. wires, lead frames
- H01L23/522—Arrangements for conducting electric current within the device in operation from one component to another, i.e. interconnections, e.g. wires, lead frames including external interconnections consisting of a multilayer structure of conductive and insulating layers inseparably formed on the semiconductor body
- H01L23/528—Layout of the interconnection structure
- H01L23/5286—Arrangements of power or ground buses
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L23/00—Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
- H01L23/58—Structural electrical arrangements for semiconductor devices not otherwise provided for, e.g. in combination with batteries
- H01L23/585—Structural electrical arrangements for semiconductor devices not otherwise provided for, e.g. in combination with batteries comprising conductive layers or plates or strips or rods or rings
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H10—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H10D—INORGANIC ELECTRIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
- H10D30/00—Field-effect transistors [FET]
- H10D30/60—Insulated-gate field-effect transistors [IGFET]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H10—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H10D—INORGANIC ELECTRIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
- H10D62/00—Semiconductor bodies, or regions thereof, of devices having potential barriers
- H10D62/10—Shapes, relative sizes or dispositions of the regions of the semiconductor bodies; Shapes of the semiconductor bodies
- H10D62/124—Shapes, relative sizes or dispositions of the regions of semiconductor bodies or of junctions between the regions
- H10D62/126—Top-view geometrical layouts of the regions or the junctions
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H10—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H10D—INORGANIC ELECTRIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
- H10D64/00—Electrodes of devices having potential barriers
- H10D64/20—Electrodes characterised by their shapes, relative sizes or dispositions
- H10D64/23—Electrodes carrying the current to be rectified, amplified, oscillated or switched, e.g. sources, drains, anodes or cathodes
- H10D64/251—Source or drain electrodes for field-effect devices
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L2924/00—Indexing scheme for arrangements or methods for connecting or disconnecting semiconductor or solid-state bodies as covered by H01L24/00
- H01L2924/0001—Technical content checked by a classifier
- H01L2924/0002—Not covered by any one of groups H01L24/00, H01L24/00 and H01L2224/00
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H10—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H10D—INORGANIC ELECTRIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
- H10D62/00—Semiconductor bodies, or regions thereof, of devices having potential barriers
- H10D62/10—Shapes, relative sizes or dispositions of the regions of the semiconductor bodies; Shapes of the semiconductor bodies
- H10D62/102—Constructional design considerations for preventing surface leakage or controlling electric field concentration
- H10D62/103—Constructional design considerations for preventing surface leakage or controlling electric field concentration for increasing or controlling the breakdown voltage of reverse-biased devices
- H10D62/105—Constructional design considerations for preventing surface leakage or controlling electric field concentration for increasing or controlling the breakdown voltage of reverse-biased devices by having particular doping profiles, shapes or arrangements of PN junctions; by having supplementary regions, e.g. junction termination extension [JTE]
- H10D62/106—Constructional design considerations for preventing surface leakage or controlling electric field concentration for increasing or controlling the breakdown voltage of reverse-biased devices by having particular doping profiles, shapes or arrangements of PN junctions; by having supplementary regions, e.g. junction termination extension [JTE] having supplementary regions doped oppositely to or in rectifying contact with regions of the semiconductor bodies, e.g. guard rings with PN or Schottky junctions
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a semiconductor device, and more particularly to a metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor with improved protection against electrostatic discharge.
- CMOS complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor
- One known high-current transistor design is the finger design illustrated in FIG. 1, which places multiple gate electrodes 1 between an alternating series of source 3 and drain 5 diffusions.
- the transistor is an n-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS) transistor, for example, the source and drain diffusions 3 , 5 are n-type diffusions disposed in a p-type well or substrate 7 , and the transistor is surrounded by a p + -type diffusion 9 through which a fixed potential is supplied to the well or substrate 7 . Since the p + -type diffusion 9 helps prevent CMOS latch-up, it is also known as a guard ring. For an n-channel transistor, the source and guard ring diffusions 3 , 9 are normally coupled to ground.
- the finger design provides ample total channel width to drive a large load, or to shunt ESD current safely from the drain diffusions 5 to the source diffusions 3 .
- parasitic diodes 10 are formed between the ends of the drain diffusions 5 and the guard ring diffusion 9 . If these diffusions 5 , 9 are too close together, the parasitic diodes 10 may break down under ESD stress, leading to thermal damage as discharge current surges through the relatively small total diode width. To avoid such damage, enough space to prevent breakdown must be provided between the drain diffusions 5 and guard ring diffusion 9 , but this increases the area of the transistor.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,714,784, issued to Ker et al. discloses an alternative design, shown in FIG. 3, in which a guard ring diffusion 9 , source diffusion 11 , and gate electrode 13 form concentric square loops converging on a central square drain diffusion 15 .
- this design eliminates the parasitic diode shown in FIG. 2, enabling the transistor dimensions to be reduced without loss of ESD robustness.
- the transistor in FIG. 3 is vulnerable to damage, however, at the overlapping corners 16 of the gate electrode 13 and drain diffusion 15 . This problem is thought to result from electric field concentration combined with poor gate oxide quality at the corners 16 . Although the failure mechanism is not understood in detail, it is known that in general the gate-drain breakdown voltage of a field-effect transistor decreases as the number of corners in its active region increases. The result of an oxide breakdown under ESD stress is often fatal to the device: the ESD current burns a hole through the oxide film.
- An object of the present invention is to provide a semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge.
- Another object of the invention is to simplify the design of a semiconductor device to provide a specified level of protection from electrostatic discharge.
- the inventive semiconductor device has a semiconductor substrate covered by an oxide film.
- a polygonal drain diffusion is disposed in the substrate, an annular polygonal source diffusion is disposed in the substrate surrounding the drain diffusion, and a plurality of gate electrodes are disposed on the oxide film between mutually facing sides of the polygonal source and drain diffusions, partially overlapping the facing sides of the source and drain diffusions but avoiding corners of the drain diffusion.
- an annular polygonal gate electrode is disposed on the oxide film, a plurality of source diffusions are disposed in the substrate, facing and partially beneath respective exterior sides of the gate electrode, and a polygonal drain diffusion with deleted corners is disposed in the substrate, facing and partially beneath the interior sides of the gate electrode but avoiding the interior corners of the gate electrode.
- a plurality of drain diffusions are disposed in the substrate on respective sides of a polygonal area of the substrate, avoiding corners of the polygonal area.
- a plurality of source diffusions are disposed in the substrate exterior to the polygonal area and drain diffusions, facing the drain diffusions at a certain distance.
- a plurality of gate electrodes are disposed on the oxide film between mutually facing sides of the source and drain diffusions, partially overlapping the facing sides of the source and drain diffusions.
- the semiconductor device may also include an annular guard ring diffusion disposed in the substrate surrounding the source diffusion or diffusions.
- the semiconductor substrate and guard ring diffusion are preferably of a first conductive type, the source and drain diffusions being of a second conductive type.
- the semiconductor device may have a first metal interconnection pattern coupling the source diffusion or diffusions to a power-supply or ground potential, and a second metal interconnection pattern coupling the drain diffusion or diffusions to an input or output lead of an integrated circuit in which the semiconductor device is a circuit element.
- the first metal interconnection pattern may also couple the gate electrode or electrodes to the power-supply or ground potential.
- the invention provides improved protection from electrostatic discharge by avoiding gate-drain overlap in corner areas, thereby avoiding electric field concentration in areas where oxide quality is comparatively poor.
- the second and third aspects of the invention simplify the design of the semiconductor device because the level of protection from electrostatic discharge depends linearly on the polygonal side dimensions of the device.
- the third aspect of the invention also simplifies the design of the semiconductor device by providing added layout flexibility.
- FIG. 1 is a plan view of a conventional finger-type field-effect transistor
- FIG. 2 is a sectional view through line A 2 -A 2 in FIG. 1;
- FIG. 3 is a plan view of another conventional type of field-effect transistor
- FIG. 4 is a plan view of a field-effect transistor embodying the first aspect of the invention.
- FIG. 5 is a sectional view through line A 5 -A 5 in FIG. 4;
- FIG. 6 is a sectional view through line A 6 -A 6 in FIG. 4;
- FIG. 7 is a plan view of a field-effect transistor embodying the second aspect of the invention.
- FIG. 8 is a sectional view through line A 8 -A 8 in FIG. 7;
- FIG. 9 is a sectional view through line A 9 -A 9 in FIG. 7;
- FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the dependence of ESD breakdown voltage on channel width in the transistor in FIG. 7;
- FIG. 11 is a plan view of a field-effect transistor embodying the third aspect of the invention.
- FIGS. 4-6 show a field-effect transistor comprising a guard ring diffusion 9 , a source diffusion 11 , and a drain diffusion 15 formed in a silicon semiconductor substrate 17 .
- the drain diffusion 15 is square
- the source diffusion 11 is a square annulus surrounding the drain diffusion 15
- the guard ring diffusion 9 is a square annulus surrounding the source diffusion 11 .
- each gate electrode 19 Disposed between the four sides of the drain diffusion 15 and the facing sides of the source diffusion 11 , and partially overlapping these sides, are four gate electrodes 19 , each a rectangular body of polycrystalline silicon (polysilicon) formed on the substrate 17 , insulated from the substrate 17 by an oxide film (not visible).
- the gate electrodes 19 do not overlap the corners 21 of the drain diffusion 15 , or the corners 23 of the source diffusion 11 .
- the substrate 17 , diffusions 9 , 11 , 15 , and gate electrode 19 are covered by an interlayer dielectric film 25 shown in FIGS. 5 and 6.
- the transistor may be either an n-channel (NMOS) transistor or a p-channel (PMOS) transistor.
- NMOS n-channel
- PMOS p-channel
- the source and drain diffusions 11 , 15 are n-type
- the substrate 17 is p-type
- the guard ring diffusion 9 is p + -type, as illustrated in the drawings.
- the source and drain diffusions 11 , 15 include both a comparatively lightly doped n ⁇ portion and a comparatively heavily doped n + portion, as shown.
- the source and drain diffusions 11 , 15 are p-type (with p ⁇ and p + portions)
- the substrate 17 is n-type
- the guard ring diffusion 9 is n + -type.
- the drain diffusion 15 is electrically coupled by a plurality of metal contacts 27 to a metal drain interconnection pattern 29 disposed above the interlayer dielectric film 25 .
- Four metal source interconnection patterns 31 are also formed on the interlayer dielectric film 25 , and are electrically coupled by metal contacts 33 , 35 to the source diffusion 11 and the gate electrodes 19 .
- One of the source interconnection patterns 31 is also coupled by metal contacts 37 to the guard ring diffusion 9 .
- the drain interconnection pattern 29 is coupled to, for example, an input or output signal lead (not shown) of an integrated circuit in which the transistor in FIGS. 4-6 forms one circuit element.
- the four source interconnection patterns 31 are coupled to ground if the transistor is an n-channel device, or to the power supply if the transistor is a p-channel device.
- the guard ring 9 can receive a fixed potential different from the ground or power-supply potential, and the gate electrodes 19 can receive a signal potential instead of the ground or power-supply potential.
- the gate electrodes 19 are insulated from the substrate 17 by an oxide film 39 including thick field oxide portions 41 .
- the field oxide portions 41 surround the guard ring 9 , separate the guard ring 9 from the source diffusion 11 , and separate the source diffusion 11 from the drain diffusion 15 .
- the gate electrodes 19 are disposed above the last of these field oxide portions 41 , but extend beyond the field oxide portions onto the thinner parts of the oxide film 39 .
- the transistor in the first embodiment operates in much the same way as the prior-art device shown in FIG. 3, providing ESD protection by shunting surge current from the drain interconnection pattern 29 through the drain diffusion 15 , the channel region underlying the gate electrodes 19 , the source diffusion 11 , and the source interconnection patterns 31 to the power supply or ground.
- a strong electric field is created between the gate electrodes 19 and the drain diffusion 15 .
- this field becomes most intense at the corners 16 of the gate electrode 13 , which coincide with the corners of the drain diffusion 15 . It is precisely at these corner areas that the quality of the gate oxide film is poorest and the risk of an oxide breakdown is highest.
- FIGS. 1 In the invented transistor in FIGS.
- the gate electrodes 19 avoid the corners 21 of the drain diffusion 15 , so there is no concentrated electric field at the points where the oxide film 39 is most vulnerable to breakdown.
- the first embodiment therefore provides a higher degree of ESD protection than is attained by the prior art in FIG. 3.
- FIG. 7 shows a field-effect transistor comprising a guard ring diffusion 9 , four source diffusions 43 , and a drain diffusion 45 formed in a silicon semiconductor substrate.
- the source and drain diffusions 43 , 45 are n-type with n + and n ⁇ regions, the substrate is p-type, and the guard ring diffusion 9 is p + -type;
- the source and drain diffusions 43 , 45 are p-type with p + and p ⁇ regions, the substrate is n-type, and the guard ring diffusion 9 is n + -type.
- the drain diffusion 45 has the shape of a stubby square cross, that is, a square with the four corners removed.
- the source diffusions 43 are rectangles facing the four ends of the drain diffusion 45 .
- the guard ring diffusion 9 is a square annulus surrounding the source diffusions 43 .
- the gate electrode 47 in this transistor has a square annular shape covering the four channel regions between the source diffusions 43 and the stubby ends of the drain diffusion 45 , and partly overlapping the source and drain diffusions 43 , 45 .
- the gate electrode 47 is, for example, a polysilicon electrode insulated from the substrate 17 by an oxide film 39 having thick field oxide portions 41 as shown in FIGS. 8 and 9.
- the gate electrode 47 and substrate 17 are covered by an interlayer dielectric film 25 .
- the drain diffusion 45 is electrically coupled through metal contacts 27 to a metal drain interconnection pattern 29
- the source diffusions 43 , gate electrode 47 , and guard ring 9 are coupled to a source interconnection pattern 31 through metal contacts 33 , 35 , 37 .
- the metal source interconnection pattern 31 is coupled to ground for an n-channel transistor (the type illustrated in FIGS. 8 and 9), or to the power supply for a p-channel transistor (not illustrated).
- the metal drain interconnection pattern 29 is coupled to, for example, an input or output lead of an integrated circuit in which the transistor in FIGS. 7-9 resides.
- the second embodiment operates in substantially the same way as the first embodiment, providing ESD protection by shunting surge current from drain to source, thus to the power supply or ground. Damage to the oxide film 39 is avoided because the corners 49 of the gate electrode 47 do not coincide with any corners of the drain diffusion 45 . The electric field created by an electrostatic discharge is accordingly not concentrated in the corner areas, where the oxide film 39 is most vulnerable to breakdown.
- the degree of ESD protection provided in the second embodiment depends on the dimension W in FIG. 7, corresponding to one-fourth of the total channel width.
- the dependence is substantially linear, as illustrated in FIG. 10; this linearity facilitates the design of the transistor to provide a given level of ESD protection.
- the level of ESD protection provided by the prior art in FIG. 3 in contrast, does not have a simple linear dependence on the transistor dimensions, because of the effect of electric field concentration at the overlapping corners 16 of the gate and drain electrodes.
- FIG. 11 shows a field-effect transistor comprising a guard ring diffusion 9 , four source diffusions 43 , and four drain diffusions 51 in a silicon semiconductor substrate.
- the source and drain diffusions 43 , 51 are rectangular in shape.
- the source and drain diffusions 43 , 51 are n-type with n + and n ⁇ regions, the substrate is p-type, and the guard ring diffusion 9 is p + -type;
- the source and drain diffusions 43 , 51 are p-type with p + and p ⁇ regions, the substrate is n-type, and the guard ring diffusion 9 is n + -type.
- the four drain diffusions 51 substantially surround a central square area 52 in which no diffusion is formed, the drain diffusions 51 being longitudinally parallel to the four sides of the square.
- the four source diffusions 43 lie outside and face the four drain diffusions 51 .
- the guard ring diffusion 9 is a square annulus surrounding the source diffusions 43 .
- gate electrodes 53 cover the four channel regions between the source diffusions 43 and gate diffusions 51 , partly overlapping the source and drain diffusions 43 , 51 .
- the gate electrodes 51 are, for example, polysilicon electrodes insulated from the substrate by an oxide film (not shown) having thick field portions as in the preceding embodiments.
- a metal drain interconnection pattern 29 is electrically coupled to the drain diffusions 53 through metal contacts 27 .
- a metal source interconnection pattern 31 is electrically coupled to the source diffusions 43 , gate electrodes 53 , and guard ring 9 through metal contacts 33 , 35 , 37 . These connections are the same as in the preceding embodiments, except that the metal drain interconnection 29 and metal source interconnection pattern 31 in the third embodiment are disposed in separate metal interconnection layers.
- the metal source interconnection pattern 31 is coupled to ground for an n-channel transistor, or to the power supply for a p-channel transistor.
- the metal drain interconnection pattern 29 is coupled to, for example, an input or output lead of an integrated circuit in which the transistor in FIG. 11 resides.
- the third embodiment operates in substantially the same way as the second embodiment, providing a degree of ESD protection that depends linearly on the dimension W corresponding to one-fourth total channel width.
- ESD robustness is improved because the four gate electrodes 53 do not form a square loop with interior corners at which the gate-drain electric field becomes concentrated, so ESD does not stress the gate oxide film at the points at which it is weakest.
- the extent of the gate electrodes 53 is limited to areas in which the quality of the underlying oxide film is relatively good.
- the third embodiment provides added design and layout flexibility, comprising as it does four ordinary field-effect transistors arranged around the sides of a square.
- the four drain electrodes 51 are united into a single drain electrode having the stubby cross shape shown in the second embodiment.
- the invention is not limited to transistors having the square shapes shown in the drawings. Similar effects can be obtained in transistors of other polygonal shapes, such as rectangular or hexagonal shapes, by avoiding gate-drain overlap at the corners of the polygonal shape.
- the substrate is not limited to silicon, and the gate electrodes are not limited to polysilicon. Other well-known materials may be used.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Semiconductor Integrated Circuits (AREA)
- Metal-Oxide And Bipolar Metal-Oxide Semiconductor Integrated Circuits (AREA)
- Insulated Gate Type Field-Effect Transistor (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to a semiconductor device, and more particularly to a metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor with improved protection against electrostatic discharge.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- The shrinking dimensions of complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) integrated circuits require special designs for transistors that conduct large amounts of current. Such transistors are found in particular in CMOS input and output circuits, where they are needed to drive heavy loads and to provide protection from electrostatic discharge (ESD).
- One known high-current transistor design is the finger design illustrated in FIG. 1, which places
multiple gate electrodes 1 between an alternating series ofsource 3 anddrain 5 diffusions. If the transistor is an n-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS) transistor, for example, the source anddrain diffusions substrate 7, and the transistor is surrounded by a p+-type diffusion 9 through which a fixed potential is supplied to the well orsubstrate 7. Since the p+-type diffusion 9 helps prevent CMOS latch-up, it is also known as a guard ring. For an n-channel transistor, the source andguard ring diffusions drain diffusions 5 to thesource diffusions 3. - As shown in FIG. 2, however,
parasitic diodes 10 are formed between the ends of thedrain diffusions 5 and theguard ring diffusion 9. If thesediffusions parasitic diodes 10 may break down under ESD stress, leading to thermal damage as discharge current surges through the relatively small total diode width. To avoid such damage, enough space to prevent breakdown must be provided between thedrain diffusions 5 andguard ring diffusion 9, but this increases the area of the transistor. - U.S. Pat. No. 5,714,784, issued to Ker et al., discloses an alternative design, shown in FIG. 3, in which a
guard ring diffusion 9,source diffusion 11, andgate electrode 13 form concentric square loops converging on a centralsquare drain diffusion 15. By separating the drain and guard ring diffusions, this design eliminates the parasitic diode shown in FIG. 2, enabling the transistor dimensions to be reduced without loss of ESD robustness. - The transistor in FIG. 3 is vulnerable to damage, however, at the overlapping
corners 16 of thegate electrode 13 anddrain diffusion 15. This problem is thought to result from electric field concentration combined with poor gate oxide quality at thecorners 16. Although the failure mechanism is not understood in detail, it is known that in general the gate-drain breakdown voltage of a field-effect transistor decreases as the number of corners in its active region increases. The result of an oxide breakdown under ESD stress is often fatal to the device: the ESD current burns a hole through the oxide film. - An object of the present invention is to provide a semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge.
- Another object of the invention is to simplify the design of a semiconductor device to provide a specified level of protection from electrostatic discharge.
- The inventive semiconductor device has a semiconductor substrate covered by an oxide film.
- According to a first aspect of the invention, a polygonal drain diffusion is disposed in the substrate, an annular polygonal source diffusion is disposed in the substrate surrounding the drain diffusion, and a plurality of gate electrodes are disposed on the oxide film between mutually facing sides of the polygonal source and drain diffusions, partially overlapping the facing sides of the source and drain diffusions but avoiding corners of the drain diffusion.
- According to a second aspect of the invention, an annular polygonal gate electrode is disposed on the oxide film, a plurality of source diffusions are disposed in the substrate, facing and partially beneath respective exterior sides of the gate electrode, and a polygonal drain diffusion with deleted corners is disposed in the substrate, facing and partially beneath the interior sides of the gate electrode but avoiding the interior corners of the gate electrode.
- According to a third aspect of the invention, a plurality of drain diffusions are disposed in the substrate on respective sides of a polygonal area of the substrate, avoiding corners of the polygonal area. A plurality of source diffusions are disposed in the substrate exterior to the polygonal area and drain diffusions, facing the drain diffusions at a certain distance. A plurality of gate electrodes are disposed on the oxide film between mutually facing sides of the source and drain diffusions, partially overlapping the facing sides of the source and drain diffusions.
- In any of these aspects of the invention, the semiconductor device may also include an annular guard ring diffusion disposed in the substrate surrounding the source diffusion or diffusions. The semiconductor substrate and guard ring diffusion are preferably of a first conductive type, the source and drain diffusions being of a second conductive type.
- The semiconductor device may have a first metal interconnection pattern coupling the source diffusion or diffusions to a power-supply or ground potential, and a second metal interconnection pattern coupling the drain diffusion or diffusions to an input or output lead of an integrated circuit in which the semiconductor device is a circuit element. The first metal interconnection pattern may also couple the gate electrode or electrodes to the power-supply or ground potential.
- The invention provides improved protection from electrostatic discharge by avoiding gate-drain overlap in corner areas, thereby avoiding electric field concentration in areas where oxide quality is comparatively poor.
- The second and third aspects of the invention simplify the design of the semiconductor device because the level of protection from electrostatic discharge depends linearly on the polygonal side dimensions of the device.
- The third aspect of the invention also simplifies the design of the semiconductor device by providing added layout flexibility.
- In the attached drawings:
- FIG. 1 is a plan view of a conventional finger-type field-effect transistor;
- FIG. 2 is a sectional view through line A2-A2 in FIG. 1;
- FIG. 3 is a plan view of another conventional type of field-effect transistor;
- FIG. 4 is a plan view of a field-effect transistor embodying the first aspect of the invention;
- FIG. 5 is a sectional view through line A5-A5 in FIG. 4;
- FIG. 6 is a sectional view through line A6-A6 in FIG. 4;
- FIG. 7 is a plan view of a field-effect transistor embodying the second aspect of the invention;
- FIG. 8 is a sectional view through line A8-A8 in FIG. 7;
- FIG. 9 is a sectional view through line A9-A9 in FIG. 7;
- FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the dependence of ESD breakdown voltage on channel width in the transistor in FIG. 7; and
- FIG. 11 is a plan view of a field-effect transistor embodying the third aspect of the invention.
- Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the attached drawings, in which like elements are indicated by like reference characters.
- As a first embodiment of the invention, FIGS. 4-6 show a field-effect transistor comprising a
guard ring diffusion 9, asource diffusion 11, and adrain diffusion 15 formed in asilicon semiconductor substrate 17. As shown in FIG. 4, thedrain diffusion 15 is square, thesource diffusion 11 is a square annulus surrounding thedrain diffusion 15, and theguard ring diffusion 9 is a square annulus surrounding thesource diffusion 11. - Disposed between the four sides of the
drain diffusion 15 and the facing sides of thesource diffusion 11, and partially overlapping these sides, are fourgate electrodes 19, each a rectangular body of polycrystalline silicon (polysilicon) formed on thesubstrate 17, insulated from thesubstrate 17 by an oxide film (not visible). Thegate electrodes 19 do not overlap thecorners 21 of thedrain diffusion 15, or thecorners 23 of thesource diffusion 11. Thesubstrate 17,diffusions gate electrode 19 are covered by an interlayerdielectric film 25 shown in FIGS. 5 and 6. - The transistor may be either an n-channel (NMOS) transistor or a p-channel (PMOS) transistor. For an n-channel transistor, the source and
drain diffusions substrate 17 is p-type, and theguard ring diffusion 9 is p+-type, as illustrated in the drawings. The source anddrain diffusions drain diffusions substrate 17 is n-type, and theguard ring diffusion 9 is n+-type. - The
drain diffusion 15 is electrically coupled by a plurality ofmetal contacts 27 to a metaldrain interconnection pattern 29 disposed above the interlayerdielectric film 25. Four metalsource interconnection patterns 31 are also formed on the interlayerdielectric film 25, and are electrically coupled bymetal contacts source diffusion 11 and thegate electrodes 19. One of thesource interconnection patterns 31 is also coupled bymetal contacts 37 to theguard ring diffusion 9. Thedrain interconnection pattern 29 is coupled to, for example, an input or output signal lead (not shown) of an integrated circuit in which the transistor in FIGS. 4-6 forms one circuit element. The foursource interconnection patterns 31 are coupled to ground if the transistor is an n-channel device, or to the power supply if the transistor is a p-channel device. - The above interconnections are appropriate if the transistor is used for ESD protection, but the first embodiment is not limited to these interconnections. For example, the
guard ring 9 can receive a fixed potential different from the ground or power-supply potential, and thegate electrodes 19 can receive a signal potential instead of the ground or power-supply potential. - The
gate electrodes 19 are insulated from thesubstrate 17 by anoxide film 39 including thickfield oxide portions 41. Thefield oxide portions 41 surround theguard ring 9, separate theguard ring 9 from thesource diffusion 11, and separate thesource diffusion 11 from thedrain diffusion 15. Thegate electrodes 19 are disposed above the last of thesefield oxide portions 41, but extend beyond the field oxide portions onto the thinner parts of theoxide film 39. - The transistor in the first embodiment operates in much the same way as the prior-art device shown in FIG. 3, providing ESD protection by shunting surge current from the
drain interconnection pattern 29 through thedrain diffusion 15, the channel region underlying thegate electrodes 19, thesource diffusion 11, and thesource interconnection patterns 31 to the power supply or ground. During an ESD event, a strong electric field is created between thegate electrodes 19 and thedrain diffusion 15. In FIG. 3, this field becomes most intense at thecorners 16 of thegate electrode 13, which coincide with the corners of thedrain diffusion 15. It is precisely at these corner areas that the quality of the gate oxide film is poorest and the risk of an oxide breakdown is highest. In the invented transistor in FIGS. 4-6, thegate electrodes 19 avoid thecorners 21 of thedrain diffusion 15, so there is no concentrated electric field at the points where theoxide film 39 is most vulnerable to breakdown. The first embodiment therefore provides a higher degree of ESD protection than is attained by the prior art in FIG. 3. - As a second embodiment of the invention, FIG. 7 shows a field-effect transistor comprising a
guard ring diffusion 9, four source diffusions 43, and adrain diffusion 45 formed in a silicon semiconductor substrate. For an n-channel transistor, the source and draindiffusions guard ring diffusion 9 is p+-type; for a p-channel transistor, the source and draindiffusions guard ring diffusion 9 is n+-type. Thedrain diffusion 45 has the shape of a stubby square cross, that is, a square with the four corners removed. The source diffusions 43 are rectangles facing the four ends of thedrain diffusion 45. Theguard ring diffusion 9 is a square annulus surrounding the source diffusions 43. - The
gate electrode 47 in this transistor has a square annular shape covering the four channel regions between the source diffusions 43 and the stubby ends of thedrain diffusion 45, and partly overlapping the source and draindiffusions gate electrode 47 is, for example, a polysilicon electrode insulated from thesubstrate 17 by anoxide film 39 having thickfield oxide portions 41 as shown in FIGS. 8 and 9. Thegate electrode 47 andsubstrate 17 are covered by aninterlayer dielectric film 25. - As in the first embodiment, the
drain diffusion 45 is electrically coupled throughmetal contacts 27 to a metaldrain interconnection pattern 29, and the source diffusions 43,gate electrode 47, andguard ring 9 are coupled to asource interconnection pattern 31 throughmetal contacts source interconnection pattern 31 is coupled to ground for an n-channel transistor (the type illustrated in FIGS. 8 and 9), or to the power supply for a p-channel transistor (not illustrated). The metaldrain interconnection pattern 29 is coupled to, for example, an input or output lead of an integrated circuit in which the transistor in FIGS. 7-9 resides. - The second embodiment operates in substantially the same way as the first embodiment, providing ESD protection by shunting surge current from drain to source, thus to the power supply or ground. Damage to the
oxide film 39 is avoided because thecorners 49 of thegate electrode 47 do not coincide with any corners of thedrain diffusion 45. The electric field created by an electrostatic discharge is accordingly not concentrated in the corner areas, where theoxide film 39 is most vulnerable to breakdown. - The degree of ESD protection provided in the second embodiment depends on the dimension W in FIG. 7, corresponding to one-fourth of the total channel width. The dependence is substantially linear, as illustrated in FIG. 10; this linearity facilitates the design of the transistor to provide a given level of ESD protection. The level of ESD protection provided by the prior art in FIG. 3, in contrast, does not have a simple linear dependence on the transistor dimensions, because of the effect of electric field concentration at the overlapping
corners 16 of the gate and drain electrodes. - As a third embodiment of the invention, FIG. 11 shows a field-effect transistor comprising a
guard ring diffusion 9, four source diffusions 43, and fourdrain diffusions 51 in a silicon semiconductor substrate. The source and draindiffusions diffusions guard ring diffusion 9 is p+-type; for a p-channel transistor, the source and draindiffusions guard ring diffusion 9 is n+-type. The fourdrain diffusions 51 substantially surround a centralsquare area 52 in which no diffusion is formed, thedrain diffusions 51 being longitudinally parallel to the four sides of the square. The four source diffusions 43 lie outside and face the fourdrain diffusions 51. Theguard ring diffusion 9 is a square annulus surrounding the source diffusions 43. - Four
gate electrodes 53 cover the four channel regions between the source diffusions 43 andgate diffusions 51, partly overlapping the source and draindiffusions gate electrodes 51 are, for example, polysilicon electrodes insulated from the substrate by an oxide film (not shown) having thick field portions as in the preceding embodiments. - A metal
drain interconnection pattern 29 is electrically coupled to thedrain diffusions 53 throughmetal contacts 27. A metalsource interconnection pattern 31 is electrically coupled to the source diffusions 43,gate electrodes 53, andguard ring 9 throughmetal contacts metal drain interconnection 29 and metalsource interconnection pattern 31 in the third embodiment are disposed in separate metal interconnection layers. The metalsource interconnection pattern 31 is coupled to ground for an n-channel transistor, or to the power supply for a p-channel transistor. The metaldrain interconnection pattern 29 is coupled to, for example, an input or output lead of an integrated circuit in which the transistor in FIG. 11 resides. - The third embodiment operates in substantially the same way as the second embodiment, providing a degree of ESD protection that depends linearly on the dimension W corresponding to one-fourth total channel width. Compared with the prior art in FIG. 3, ESD robustness is improved because the four
gate electrodes 53 do not form a square loop with interior corners at which the gate-drain electric field becomes concentrated, so ESD does not stress the gate oxide film at the points at which it is weakest. The extent of thegate electrodes 53 is limited to areas in which the quality of the underlying oxide film is relatively good. - Compared with the first and second embodiments, the third embodiment provides added design and layout flexibility, comprising as it does four ordinary field-effect transistors arranged around the sides of a square.
- In a variation of the third embodiment, the four
drain electrodes 51 are united into a single drain electrode having the stubby cross shape shown in the second embodiment. - The invention is not limited to transistors having the square shapes shown in the drawings. Similar effects can be obtained in transistors of other polygonal shapes, such as rectangular or hexagonal shapes, by avoiding gate-drain overlap at the corners of the polygonal shape.
- The substrate is not limited to silicon, and the gate electrodes are not limited to polysilicon. Other well-known materials may be used.
- Those skilled in the art will recognize that further variations are possible within the scope of the invention, which is defined in the appended claims.
Claims (18)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/384,714 US6798022B1 (en) | 2003-03-11 | 2003-03-11 | Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge |
US10/947,329 US7238991B2 (en) | 2003-03-11 | 2004-09-23 | Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/384,714 US6798022B1 (en) | 2003-03-11 | 2003-03-11 | Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/947,329 Division US7238991B2 (en) | 2003-03-11 | 2004-09-23 | Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040178454A1 true US20040178454A1 (en) | 2004-09-16 |
US6798022B1 US6798022B1 (en) | 2004-09-28 |
Family
ID=32961371
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/384,714 Expired - Fee Related US6798022B1 (en) | 2003-03-11 | 2003-03-11 | Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge |
US10/947,329 Expired - Lifetime US7238991B2 (en) | 2003-03-11 | 2004-09-23 | Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/947,329 Expired - Lifetime US7238991B2 (en) | 2003-03-11 | 2004-09-23 | Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6798022B1 (en) |
Cited By (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060097330A1 (en) * | 2004-11-10 | 2006-05-11 | Kuo-Feng Yu | Asymmetrical layout structure for ESD protection |
US20080067614A1 (en) * | 2004-12-28 | 2008-03-20 | Hynix Semiconductor Inc. | Metal oxide semiconductor transistor and method for manufacturing the same |
US20080082761A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Eric Nels Herness | Generic locking service for business integration |
US20080091679A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-17 | Eric Nels Herness | Generic sequencing service for business integration |
US20080091712A1 (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2008-04-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for non-intrusive event sequencing |
US20080108217A1 (en) * | 2005-12-14 | 2008-05-08 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Esd protection for passive integrated devices |
US20080135934A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-12 | Vanguard International Semiconductor Corporation | Laterally diffused metal oxide semiconductor transistors |
US20080148299A1 (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2008-06-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for detecting work completion in loosely coupled components |
US20080157195A1 (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2008-07-03 | Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. | Geometry of mos device with low on-resistance |
US20080185664A1 (en) * | 2007-02-02 | 2008-08-07 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | High Voltage Transistors |
US20090020765A1 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2009-01-22 | Rohm Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor Device and Method for Manufacturing Same |
US20100333071A1 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2010-12-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Time Based Context Sampling of Trace Data with Support for Multiple Virtual Machines |
AU2010201661B1 (en) * | 2010-04-27 | 2011-06-16 | Bui, Dac Thong Mr | Avalanche MOS-FET |
CN103636002A (en) * | 2011-05-19 | 2014-03-12 | 惠普发展公司,有限责任合伙企业 | Device active channel aspect ratio greater than the channel aspect ratio |
US8799872B2 (en) | 2010-06-27 | 2014-08-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Sampling with sample pacing |
US8799904B2 (en) | 2011-01-21 | 2014-08-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Scalable system call stack sampling |
US8843684B2 (en) | 2010-06-11 | 2014-09-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Performing call stack sampling by setting affinity of target thread to a current process to prevent target thread migration |
US9176783B2 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2015-11-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Idle transitions sampling with execution context |
CN105593978A (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2016-05-18 | 惠普发展公司,有限责任合伙企业 | Semiconductor device and method of making same |
US9418005B2 (en) | 2008-07-15 | 2016-08-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing garbage collection in a data processing system |
CN108346690A (en) * | 2017-01-24 | 2018-07-31 | 恩智浦有限公司 | Semiconductor device including switch |
Families Citing this family (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6798022B1 (en) * | 2003-03-11 | 2004-09-28 | Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge |
US6940131B2 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2005-09-06 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | MOS ESD CDM clamp with integral substrate injection guardring and method for fabrication |
CN1930676B (en) * | 2004-03-12 | 2010-06-16 | 罗姆股份有限公司 | Semiconductor device |
US7294892B2 (en) * | 2005-05-27 | 2007-11-13 | Faraday Technology Corp. | Multi-transistor layout capable of saving area |
US7151302B1 (en) | 2005-06-24 | 2006-12-19 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Method and apparatus for maintaining topographical uniformity of a semiconductor memory array |
JP2007194562A (en) * | 2006-01-23 | 2007-08-02 | Nec Electronics Corp | Semiconductor device and manufacturing method thereof |
US20070246740A1 (en) * | 2006-04-25 | 2007-10-25 | Jing-Chi Yu | Transistor with increased esd robustness and related layout method thereof |
US8736039B2 (en) | 2006-10-06 | 2014-05-27 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Stacked structures and methods of forming stacked structures |
US20080157222A1 (en) * | 2006-12-27 | 2008-07-03 | Mediatek Inc. | Rf integrated circuit device |
TWI359490B (en) * | 2008-01-30 | 2012-03-01 | Novatek Microelectronics Corp | Power mos device and layout |
CN101299439B (en) * | 2008-06-24 | 2011-06-22 | 广州南科集成电子有限公司 | High voltage constant current source device and manufacturing method |
JP2010087195A (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2010-04-15 | Panasonic Corp | Semiconductor device |
TW201113974A (en) * | 2009-10-07 | 2011-04-16 | Fortune Semiconductor Corp | Semiconductor chip, seal-ring structure and the manufacturing process thereof |
CN102201446A (en) * | 2011-05-10 | 2011-09-28 | 上海先进半导体制造股份有限公司 | Grounded-grid NMOS (N-channel metal oxide semiconductor) unit for antistatic protection and antistatic protection structure thereof |
FR2987938A1 (en) * | 2012-03-12 | 2013-09-13 | St Microelectronics Sa | Integrated electronic component for protection device used for protecting nodes of integrated circuit against electrostatic discharges, has annular zones associated with boxes to form triacs structures having single common trigger |
US8912057B1 (en) * | 2013-06-05 | 2014-12-16 | Globalfoundries Inc. | Fabrication of nickel free silicide for semiconductor contact metallization |
US9349795B2 (en) * | 2014-06-20 | 2016-05-24 | Infineon Technologies Austria Ag | Semiconductor switching device with different local threshold voltage |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5119162A (en) * | 1989-02-10 | 1992-06-02 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Integrated power DMOS circuit with protection diode |
US5714784A (en) * | 1995-10-19 | 1998-02-03 | Winbond Electronics Corporation | Electrostatic discharge protection device |
US5838050A (en) * | 1996-06-19 | 1998-11-17 | Winbond Electronics Corp. | Hexagon CMOS device |
US6097066A (en) * | 1997-10-06 | 2000-08-01 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Electro-static discharge protection structure for semiconductor devices |
US6621133B1 (en) * | 2002-05-09 | 2003-09-16 | United Microelectronics Corp. | Electrostatic discharge protection device |
US6680512B2 (en) * | 2001-04-12 | 2004-01-20 | Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor device having an integral protection circuit |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2914292B2 (en) * | 1996-04-25 | 1999-06-28 | 日本電気株式会社 | Semiconductor device |
US6750517B1 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2004-06-15 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company | Device layout to improve ESD robustness in deep submicron CMOS technology |
US6798022B1 (en) * | 2003-03-11 | 2004-09-28 | Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge |
-
2003
- 2003-03-11 US US10/384,714 patent/US6798022B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2004
- 2004-09-23 US US10/947,329 patent/US7238991B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5119162A (en) * | 1989-02-10 | 1992-06-02 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Integrated power DMOS circuit with protection diode |
US5714784A (en) * | 1995-10-19 | 1998-02-03 | Winbond Electronics Corporation | Electrostatic discharge protection device |
US5838050A (en) * | 1996-06-19 | 1998-11-17 | Winbond Electronics Corp. | Hexagon CMOS device |
US6097066A (en) * | 1997-10-06 | 2000-08-01 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Electro-static discharge protection structure for semiconductor devices |
US6680512B2 (en) * | 2001-04-12 | 2004-01-20 | Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor device having an integral protection circuit |
US6621133B1 (en) * | 2002-05-09 | 2003-09-16 | United Microelectronics Corp. | Electrostatic discharge protection device |
Cited By (39)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060097330A1 (en) * | 2004-11-10 | 2006-05-11 | Kuo-Feng Yu | Asymmetrical layout structure for ESD protection |
US7518192B2 (en) * | 2004-11-10 | 2009-04-14 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Asymmetrical layout structure for ESD protection |
US20080067614A1 (en) * | 2004-12-28 | 2008-03-20 | Hynix Semiconductor Inc. | Metal oxide semiconductor transistor and method for manufacturing the same |
US7888712B2 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2011-02-15 | Rohm Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor device and method for manufacturing same |
US20090020765A1 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2009-01-22 | Rohm Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor Device and Method for Manufacturing Same |
US20080108217A1 (en) * | 2005-12-14 | 2008-05-08 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Esd protection for passive integrated devices |
US7642182B2 (en) * | 2005-12-14 | 2010-01-05 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | ESD protection for passive integrated devices |
US7921075B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-04-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generic sequencing service for business integration |
US20080091679A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-17 | Eric Nels Herness | Generic sequencing service for business integration |
US20080082761A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Eric Nels Herness | Generic locking service for business integration |
US9274857B2 (en) | 2006-10-13 | 2016-03-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for detecting work completion in loosely coupled components |
US20080148299A1 (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2008-06-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for detecting work completion in loosely coupled components |
US20080091712A1 (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2008-04-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for non-intrusive event sequencing |
US9514201B2 (en) | 2006-10-13 | 2016-12-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for non-intrusive event sequencing |
US8581344B2 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2013-11-12 | Vanguard International Semiconductor Corporation | Laterally diffused metal oxide semiconductor transistors |
US20080135934A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-12 | Vanguard International Semiconductor Corporation | Laterally diffused metal oxide semiconductor transistors |
US9466596B2 (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2016-10-11 | Marvell World Trade Ltd. | Geometry of MOS device with low on-resistance |
JP2010515274A (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2010-05-06 | マーベル ワールド トレード リミテッド | Low on-resistance MOS device layout |
EP2100334A4 (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2011-03-23 | Marvell World Trade Ltd | GEOMETRY OF A MOS DEVICE WITH LOW RESISTANCE TO THE PASSING STATE |
JP2013179336A (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2013-09-09 | Marvell World Trade Ltd | Mos device arrangement with low on-resistance |
US20080157195A1 (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2008-07-03 | Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. | Geometry of mos device with low on-resistance |
CN102709285A (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2012-10-03 | 马维尔国际贸易有限公司 | Geometry of mos device with low on-resistance |
US20080185664A1 (en) * | 2007-02-02 | 2008-08-07 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | High Voltage Transistors |
EP1953827A3 (en) * | 2007-02-02 | 2009-07-29 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | High voltage transistor and method of manufacturing the same |
US7705409B2 (en) | 2007-02-02 | 2010-04-27 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | High voltage transistors |
US9418005B2 (en) | 2008-07-15 | 2016-08-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing garbage collection in a data processing system |
US20100333071A1 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2010-12-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Time Based Context Sampling of Trace Data with Support for Multiple Virtual Machines |
AU2010201661B1 (en) * | 2010-04-27 | 2011-06-16 | Bui, Dac Thong Mr | Avalanche MOS-FET |
US9176783B2 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2015-11-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Idle transitions sampling with execution context |
US8843684B2 (en) | 2010-06-11 | 2014-09-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Performing call stack sampling by setting affinity of target thread to a current process to prevent target thread migration |
US8799872B2 (en) | 2010-06-27 | 2014-08-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Sampling with sample pacing |
US8799904B2 (en) | 2011-01-21 | 2014-08-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Scalable system call stack sampling |
EP2710637A4 (en) * | 2011-05-19 | 2014-08-06 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | LENGTH / ACTIVE CHANNEL WIDTH OF DEVICE GREATER THAN LENGTH / CHANNEL WIDTH |
CN103636002B (en) * | 2011-05-19 | 2016-10-26 | 惠普发展公司,有限责任合伙企业 | Device active channel aspect ratio greater than the channel aspect ratio |
CN103636002A (en) * | 2011-05-19 | 2014-03-12 | 惠普发展公司,有限责任合伙企业 | Device active channel aspect ratio greater than the channel aspect ratio |
US10170466B2 (en) | 2011-05-19 | 2019-01-01 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Device having an active channel region |
CN105593978A (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2016-05-18 | 惠普发展公司,有限责任合伙企业 | Semiconductor device and method of making same |
US10084062B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2018-09-25 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Semiconductor device comprising a gate formed from a gate ring |
CN108346690A (en) * | 2017-01-24 | 2018-07-31 | 恩智浦有限公司 | Semiconductor device including switch |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7238991B2 (en) | 2007-07-03 |
US20050035416A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 |
US6798022B1 (en) | 2004-09-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6798022B1 (en) | Semiconductor device with improved protection from electrostatic discharge | |
US6552597B1 (en) | Integrated circuit with closely coupled high voltage output and offline transistor pair | |
JP4316036B2 (en) | Electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection circuit | |
US7154152B2 (en) | Semiconductor device | |
US8390032B2 (en) | Depletion mode field effect transistor for ESD protection | |
KR100431066B1 (en) | Semiconductor device having electro-static discharge circuit | |
US20050133839A1 (en) | Semiconductor device | |
US8067789B2 (en) | Semiconductor integrated circuit device | |
US7274071B2 (en) | Electrostatic damage protection device with protection transistor | |
KR102361141B1 (en) | Semiconductor Device for Electrostatic Discharge Protection | |
JPH0837284A (en) | Semiconductor integrated circuit device | |
JP5593160B2 (en) | Semiconductor device | |
US6479869B1 (en) | Semiconductor device with enhanced protection from electrostatic breakdown | |
US20050179087A1 (en) | LDMOS transistor with improved ESD protection | |
US6608744B1 (en) | SOI CMOS input protection circuit with open-drain configuration | |
JP2008078361A (en) | Semiconductor integrated circuit device | |
CN1319171C (en) | Semiconductor apparatus with improved ESD withstanding voltage | |
EP0848425A2 (en) | Semiconductor device including protection means | |
US8232600B2 (en) | Semiconductor integrated circuit | |
JP2006074012A (en) | Bidirectional type electrostatic discharge protection element | |
US7129546B2 (en) | Electrostatic discharge protection device | |
US6953969B2 (en) | MOSFET for an open-drain circuit and semiconductor integrated circuit device employing it | |
JP2007227697A (en) | Semiconductor device, and semiconductor integrated device | |
JP2009038099A (en) | Semiconductor device | |
US12266651B2 (en) | Electrostatic discharge protection structure |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OKI ELECTRIC INDUSTRY CO., LTD., JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KURODA, TOSHIKAZU;SASAKI, KATSUHITO;REEL/FRAME:013863/0382 Effective date: 20030220 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., JAPAN Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:OKI ELECTRIC INDUSTRY CO., LTD.;REEL/FRAME:022038/0711 Effective date: 20081001 Owner name: OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.,JAPAN Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:OKI ELECTRIC INDUSTRY CO., LTD.;REEL/FRAME:022038/0711 Effective date: 20081001 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LAPIS SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., JAPAN Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD;REEL/FRAME:032495/0483 Effective date: 20111003 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20160928 |