A pithy comment on the latest rage of activism. This picture is tongue in cheek but there is truth in it. I will shamelessly throw my friend *Shelldude* under the bus. Back in the 90's he had made some comment about the nascent P.C movement that was starting, his comment was made about the "When a nation has the leisure time to endlessly gaze at their navel and pick out the lint, this bodes ill for the society. We as a society have too much time since we as a nation don't have to fight to survive, people have too much time on their hands." I have seen all this activism stuff going on and I am dismayed, they are destroying the fabric of this country with their petty demands in the name of "social justice", that vague term that can be changed depending on the speaker and the cause. We are creating a generation of candy-asses on account of this. People are entering the workplace that have no coping skills with adversity. The rest of the world will eat their lunch and our lunch as a society.
A week ago, there was a picture published from West Point where a bunch of black women posed with the "black lives matter" upraised fist salute. This disturbed me greatly, I know according to UCMJ* when you are in uniform, you abstain from political issues. The regs are quite clear on this..
Well the Army investigated and they basically excused the behavior.....especially after the Obama White-house released a tweet supporting the women's behavior. This dismayed me, the military by design is apolitical. The founding fathers insisted it, they wanted the military to support the constitution, not whom occupied the White-house. If the politicization continues...we are closer to the age of a strongman or a banana republic.
*Uniform Code of Military Justice
I ran across this from "Alternative Right."
by
Buffalo Jenkins
As a matter of anthropological study, I have compiled a brief summary of
the types of white leftists one generally encounters today. While many
other types may exist, I believe they can largely be described as
versions or admixtures of these basic types.
In physical characteristics these types differ, however they tend to
share certain bovine facial expressions, an earnest vapidity about the
eyes. They are quick to anger (triggered) and generally unable to cope
with truths that are socially awkward. I have tried to list them in
order of danger, from least to greatest, with my choice of the seemingly
banal 'incidental Marxist' as most dangerous due to his prevalence, and
being largely unaware he is espousing Marxist ideas at all.
The categories are:
These are frail urban males who have trained themselves to think like
women. Identifiable by thin limbs (and tight trousers), pot bellies,
downy beards, checkered shirts and wool hats. Physically and mentally
weak, they follow and support insane but attractive young women in every
branch of leftism in the vain and fruitless hopes of bedding (or even
just impressing) them. Failed creatures from start to finish, often the
product of a single mother upbringing, there is some faint hope a few
will grow out of this phase in adulthood.
A direct result of modernist miseducation, as a group they are often a
lethal combination of naivety, wild emotions, faux-rebelliousness
against exceedingly “safe” targets (i.e. racists, sexists, homophobes,
et al),
bad taste, and endless pecking-order envy. Superficial right to their
extremely cute cores, they are a force in this modern world well beyond
what nature intended – empowered by our militant non-judgementalism and
fired up against any opinion that sounds adroit or masculine. They are
often seen mugging a 'perfect victim face' on youtube videos where they
have invented a new way to blame society for some everyday commonplace
grievance.
These are bland and unoriginal individuals, simply ‘going with the flow’
of conformist thought and pop culture trends. Easily angered, confused
by ideas that don't have manifest social impact, they tend to be
obsessed with trivialities, status, and materialism. Guilty not of
leftist idealism so much as a simple lack of imagination, conformists
will adapt to any societal model, providing it is culturally ascendant
and expresses perceived majority opinion. There are a shocking number of
people in this sad but not hopeless category.
Often older, hippyish gentlemen who nonetheless actually possess a solid
work ethic, they tend to be potentially worthwhile individuals. Their
main character flaw, however, is that they are completely obsessed with
class envy at every level of their lives. Hatred of anything that
strikes them as 'hoity toity' or 'silver spoonish' drives them to
leftist extremes, often with endless talk of 'the people' and what has
or hasn't been done in their name. 'Snooty' high culture, signs of
wealth or prosperity in general, and anything that suggests the
realities of 'inequality' will drive them into ever increasing rages.
Sometimes they can drift into the antifa category, sometimes into a
victim-oriented welfare class. They tend to like folk music and will
often be physically involved in community activism, such as building
shelters for Calais jungle migrants or volunteering at methodone
clinics. Overall they are high trust, morally sound people who are
simply misguided or consumed by embitterment against their social
betters. Ironically, they are the most likely to be absolute tyrants
should they for any reason make their way up the social ladder to
positions of actual power.
These pseudo-intellectualist kids who get hopping mad on social media
about ‘Black Lives Matter’ and ‘transphobia’ and other innanities, then
join an allowed campus echo chamber of fellow victim-goats bleating
angrily about inequality. Very close to antifa, though specifically
communist and not broadly anarchist. They tend to be sober dressers,
mildly overweight white guys or mulatto women with dreadlocks and trendy
glasses.
Not all homosexuals are leftists, but those that are tend to be extreme
social justice warriors who's working framework of the world is one of
joining a victim group to work against 'oppression.' Male homosexuals
are often devoutly debauched, while lesbians are less into sex.
Homosexuals who are also equal parts 'college communists' and
'feminists,' can be seen encouraging certain suicidal leftisms that will
result in the destruction of their chosen identity group, such as mass
immigration of Islamic militants.
Many homosexuals today I believe are in it as a 'lifestyle choice' and
not due to childhood molestation or hormone imbalance as might be
classically the case, and as with other forms of leftism they may find
themselves stuck on this track due to emotional investment. It's not an
easy course to renege on. This emotional investment then seems an
invaluable loss, which forces a further retreat from reality as life
experience affects their subconscious with suggestions that the whole
'sexual revolution' and attention-seeking oppressed identity group
joining was really a bit of juvenile hysteria. But oops, too late, now
you're married to another woman/man!
This pack of Trotskyite punk rockers is invariably composed of youthful
anarchists who are angry at the world, probably due to experiences with
broken homes, impoverished single parent upbringings, bullying or other
youthful trauma, all of which has resulted in a generalized rage that
they target at civilization itself. Usually sexually ambiguous, often
undistinguishable from street urchins, they are undoubtedly by and large
from ethnically white enclaves without any mature understanding of the
realities of race or gender. Rarely older than thirty five and
physically dangerous, they are the blunt weapon of the left, spiteful
ignorance forged into a sword.
An extension of the ‘young girls’ category, frozen in a state of
immaturity. Now officially in the outhouse of history, feminists today
are among the most genuinely insane bizarros ever to walk the face of
the earth. Reacting with extreme anger to literally anything they don't
understand, or that may broadly be perceived as 'hateful,' they are like
an indulged perpetual baby of irrationality and vitriol. The only known
cure for women who traipse down this garden path is a radical
re-education, sudden and extreme life trauma, or in some cases having
children. One of the largest and most mortally terrifying groups on the
list, feminism will prove to have a relatively short enough overall
lifespan, as it can only last until an actual and alien patriarchy takes
over from the weak, childless, and irrational societal void they
create.
This final group are people of both genders (mostly male, the female of
this group can also be feminists) whose actions and lives are wholly
Cultural Marxist without their being aware of it. They are in some ways a
mild-seeming combination of all the above, but moreso the conformist
and the beta leftist. They are typified in somebody who gets easily
scared by outsider views, and has a strong tendency to cuck themselves
with social signaling in weak attempts at impressing their
victim-overlords.
Incidental Marxists can seem outwardly intelligent or book-smart, but
tend to have the bad taste of the conformist. Usually found working in
white-collar jobs, and engaging in idiotic businessspeak. Meaningful
culture or history is understood superficially, as something outside
their own lives and thereby unreal. They are extremely worried about
'the fascists' and 'the white supremacists' and tend to live a dream
where it is permanently 1995 and you can still blame white men for
everything bad without any real-world repercussions. Any evidence that
1995 ended 21 years ago is quickly disregarded as right wing propaganda.
A great amount of liberal news outlets directly cater to people wanting
to maintain this particular illusion.
These Incidental Marxists may have children, but they will never take as
much pride in their kids as will in their superficial friendships with
minorities and gay couples. Anybody who expresses views to the right of
them they equate as American born-again Baptists who want to teach
creationism in schools, and no amount of arguing will convince them
otherwise.
There may be some very definite types I have not categorized; if so, I
would be pleased to hear of what they might be. Where possible, attempts
should be made to save these creatures from a lifetime of self-hate and
bring them around to correct thinking. Success rates are currently low,
but rising.
The election continues with The Donald having a lock on the GOP side, here is something that is making the rounds on Facebook...
The media attacks have already started as have the surrogote Hillary minions like Indian wanna be Warren and others have started their attacks. On the Democrat side, Bernie Sanders continue to confound the establishment Democratic party
I will not vote for Bernie, but I respect him. You know what you are going to get with Bernie...One of the things that Hillary gets hammered on is her ethics....or lack therof..
There is a difference of opinion on what will happen to Hillary.....
From the Democrats...
From the Republican side..
Personally I don't see it, I saw on drudge where she got $75000 from employees from the D.O.J. None of the other candidates came even close combined. Even if the F.B.I recommends prosecution, the Justice dept will probably decline to prosecute. Obama has been successful in politicizing the Justice Dept. Nothing like the people seeing how corrupt the system is and the fix is on.