[go: up one dir, main page]

  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Also, for anyone who wants to learn about the ins and outs of mathematical optimization (what this program does), here is an excellent free resource:

    https://web.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvxbook/

    Also check out Nocedal and Wright for more numerical stuff, and all of Bertsekas’s books for more theory.

    IMO, optimization for power systems is its own subfield with its own quirks, but optimization is a general technique which should be a part of any economy at scale. I.e. revolutionaries should unironically learn optimization if you have the time to do so.

    • bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      4 months ago

      It sounds similar to things like OR-Tools, CP-SAT and Gurobi. These algorithms aren’t just useful for controlling the power grid. You can also use them for Cockshott-style Big Computer Cybersyn economy-wide planning. Or deciding which order to do your errands in, or figuring out how many blackjack hands of exactly 21 you can make out of a certain set of cards.

      TLDR: as a pretty experienced computer toucher this sounds significantly more real than I initially expected from reading the headline.

  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’ll say exactly what I felt when I used PSSE and fmincon and every other closed-source optimization program for the first time: “Neato, now where’s the source code? Why am I supposed to just trust that this will work every time?” Or at least put out a paper.

  • aaravchen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Was it because the “super code” password was “password”? From what I understand, that’s yow secure the US power grid is.