[go: up one dir, main page]

Showing posts with label Tom McNamara. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom McNamara. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

INSIDE LOOK -- THE BULLPEN OF EARLY HEARST CARTOONISTS - III: George McManus

"Let George Do It!"
And McManus Did, 
Many Times Over

We have visited, via rare archival material from King Features Syndicate archives, legendary cartoonists from the protean days of comic strips. George Herriman, Tom McNamara, and editor Rudolph Block thus far. Photographs, specialty drawings, data; the only deficiency -- out of our control, as it was "out of control" in 1917 -- is the insipid poetry that serves as promotion. But, that is why the book was produced, so we must endure. (And there are some valuable facts that leak through...)


It is interesting, and a well-known aspect of the Birth of the Comics, that commercialism played a major role. Comics were weapons in circulation wars between publishers. They received boosts -- creative freedom, vast publicity, and cartoonists treated like stars -- to assist in their acceptance by the public.

The "wars" also featured cartoonists themselves as weapons, objectives, prizes, and goals. many of the great early artists of the Funny Pages switched employers and venues, sometimes dissatisfied with their employers (we have documented that Block seriously annoyed numerous of his cartoonists to the point of their quitting Hearst)... but usually having their services bid and outbid by hungry publishers.

There is a story -- if not true it virtually encapsulates the truth of the times -- that T E Powers spent an afternoon in a Park Row bar, not working for Joseph Pulitzer of the New York World nor William Randolph Hearst of the Journal, but receiving reports from office boys how his salary was going up and up as the two publishers bid against each other for his services. (Hearst won out.)

Frederick Burr Opper drew for the New York Herald (and Puck Magazine) until purloined by Hearst. Rudolph Dirks was hired away from Hearst by Pulitzer; so was Bud Fisher with the assistance of syndicate pioneer John Wheeler. Winsor McCay drew for James Gordon Bennett's two newspapers before Hearst hired him away. George Herriman drew for the World but eventually settled in the Hearst stable. R F Outcault, whose Yellow Kid can be cited for inaugurating this crazy transmigration, worked for Pulitzer, then Hearst, then Pulitzer again, then the Herald, then Hearst until his retirement.

In the eyes of the voracious publishers (benign godfathers they were, when all is said and done; or wet-nurses) there was no bigger star in their constellations than George McManus. He had attracted the attention of Pulitzer in their original working environs of St Louis; then McManus drew for Pulitzer's New York World.

McManus the cartoonist had a short gestation as a struggling stylist; soon his artwork was polished, handsome, mannered... and funny. As a creator, he created multiple strips starring in multiple titles. His premises were funny, and his narratives flowed like stage-plays. In fact his several creations did become Broadway musicals. And his characters appeared on the market as toys and in games.

Probably the most popular of his strips was The Newlyweds, a one-premise strip (as most early comics were) about an obstreperous baby. When McManus switched to Hearst he continued the strip but renamed it Their Only Child!, finessing a sticking-point of other mutinies like Mutt and Jeff and The Katzenjammer Kids whose titles became bones of contention.

McManus created another strip for Hearst, a Sunday page called The Whole Bloomin' Family. It is curious to note that Bringing Up Father, which commenced full-term as a Hearst feature in 1913, never was a Sunday page until six years later. After that it became the major strip among Hearst and King Features' properties for years. It owned the front pages of the Hearst chain's Sunday comic sections until supplanted by Blondie in the early 1950s.

In the 1917 promotion book, McManus was allowed to illustrate the stars in his galaxy including characters he had created, and left, at Pulitzer's shop. We see the eponymous star of Let George Do It; Rosie and her Beau; and Panhandle Pete. In addition, Snookums Newlywed and his parents; the Whole Bloomin' Family; and Jiggs and Maggie of Bringing Up Father. 

 


By the way, and speaking of the Newlyweds and their only child (italics aside), we have a reprint book of daily strips from the New York World. It is from 1907. The strips appeared earlier in the year in the newspaper, not to mention the book collection -- which challenges the convention histories citing Mr A Mutt as the medium first daily strip (November 1907). More to follow in Yesterday's Papers and in the revival of nemo magazine...




Thursday, June 12, 2025

INSIDE LOOK -- THE BULLPEN OF EARLY HEARST CARTOONISTS - II: Herriman

 ... And Vintage Promotional Art, Bio, Photos
of George Herriman

by Rick Marschall 

Recent posts commenced two threads: material from a rare 1917 promotion book for William Randolph Hearst's International Feature Service, one of several syndicate operations under the umbrella of the newly organized King Features. We shared photos and bios of Tom McNamara ("Us Boys"), the cartoonist whose copy we worked from; and of Rudolph Block (Bruno Lessing), the guiding force -- eminence grise, by much evidence -- behind the first 20 years of Hearst's Sunday funnies. 






In this post, Yesterday's Papers will share the book's pages devoted to George Herriman. A photograph of the pensive cartoonist, and special art created for the book. He is credited in the text as the creator of Baron Bean, the daily strip that was separate from Krazy Kat -- starring human characters; never a crossover; never appearing in color supplements. It was a wonderful strip, as most of Herriman's creations were, of course, about a latter-day Don Quixote and Sancho Panza pair: delusional fellows drifting in, and further in, to absurd situations. As with all of Herriman's creations, comic obsessions fueled the premises of the daily strip. 

I offer apologies -- not that I had anything to do with it -- for the promotional copy the accompanied the artwork. It is more insipid than third-rate public-relations blather. And worse yet, the Hearst writer (perhaps John P Medbury, or K C Beaton, or Jack Lait, or a lesser light) fashioned the inanities in rhyme. Little that would have informed a student of the day... and certainly not scholars of our day.



The other piece is from 11 years later, from a elegantly designed and produced book touting the impressive stable of talent that could be accessed by subscriptions to the New York Journal. The "chief" it highlights is not Block but the Journal's editor William A Curley (who, as an editor in Chicago, had inspired characters in The Front Page) and Hearst's principal editorial writer Arthur Brisbane. The book appears to be a bragging-piece, perhaps issued for distribution at the annual American Newspaper Editors Association (ANPA) convention in New York. "The Journal has twice the circulation of its nearest evening-paper competitor..."; etc.

It is to be noticed that in each photograph of George Herriman he wore his iconic hat. It was once supposed, after his death, that he was embarrassed by kinky hair, leading to a belief that he was partly Black. Some years ago I shared with the comic community a piece of "news" debunking that assumption. The political cartoonist Karl Hubenthal, who knew Herriman, was surprised at that idea, and laughed as he told me that Herriman neither said nor hinted at such a thing, but was rather concerned to conceal, when he could, a wen -- a growth or sebacious cyst on his head that he could not have removed. (And in fact I own several photo portraits of Herriman without a hat.)




I love the fact that as early as 1928, Krazy Kat was already being referred to as "immortal." Surely it is. 
. 




Thursday, June 5, 2025

GEORGE HERRIMAN DISCUSSED ANIMALS IN COMICS

 

... and shows how he drew his characters.

by Rick Marschall

Some people are shy; some are "reserved"; some are introverted. They are all different personality traits. The other end of the spectrum has as many variations. It is said that actors -- superficially the most outgoing of people -- tend to be very private folks, quiet and even withdrawn in their moments away from cameras and stage lights. They hide behind their characters.

Cartoonists often occupy similar cubby-holes. Dik Browne once observed to me the dichotomy: These creators who might entertain millions, making many of them laugh or be thrilled, or otherwise be interested in their creative efforts and views of life... do not live in the limelight, except vicariously. "For the most part, we are hermits, seldom even meeting the people who read what we create." Dik at the time had a studio in his basement, near the laundry machines, with clotheslines crisscrossed over his head.



One of cartooning's most famous recluses, relatively successful at anonymity, was George Herriman. That his classic Krazy Kat was notoriously enigmatic added to the interest in his essential talent, inspiration, muses. The desert opus was either psychologically deep and comprised of nuances, or simple nonsense unconcerned with discernment of logic or illogic (I am reminded of Mark Twain's epigraph in Huckleberry Finn: Persons attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be prosecuted; persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished; persons attempting to find a plot in it will be shot.) 

Well, we don't really know (as if should make a difference to us: Herriman surely meant to amuse, not to befuddle) and he was not a congenital obscurantist. The majority of his creations were of homely domestic themes (Us Husbands; Alexander the Cat) or of his lifelong specialty, humorous obsessions (Major Ozone the Fresh-Air Fiend; Musical Mose). I proposed an examination -- not a psychoanalysis -- of these "fingerprints" of Herriman as elements of a biography of Herriman I proposed (along with the complete Kat) to to publishers before a major biography and several compilations actually were published, in some instances by the same publishers. But the themes remain, surprisingly, unexplored. In other books I have published and in numerous articles (including, very superficially, here) I have scratched the surface of the best-known anonymous cartoonist, George Herriman.

One speed-bump is the work of publicists of the past. By the end of the first decade of the 20th century, Herriman was in the continuous employ of William Randolph Hearst. Hosannas are due the virtual godfather of the American Comic Strip, and his treatment of George Herriman is a prime reason: benign neglect... a latter-day patronage much like the Medicis treated Michelangelo or Prince Esterhazy was  patron of the composer Haydn. After the 1920s almost no paper outside the Hearst chain ran Krazy Kat. Herriman participated in the Jazz Ballet of 1924, and illustrated Don Marquis's archy and mehitabel, but otherwise he lost money for Hearst... and created timeless works of comic art at the highest level.

But we still want to lift the veil. And there were those darn public-relations writers and publicity departments. How much of what they told us -- little enough anyway -- was true? 

I have discovered a publicity series cooked up by the King Features (Hearst) publicity gnomes in the early 1930s. They are articles "by" cartoonists like Herriman and Elzie Segar (Popeye) explaining their strips, their characters, their inspirations and views of their art. Additionally these articles present sketches including a few "how to draw" examples of their working methods.

Was this for regular newspaper readers, or solely for children? or both? Were they written by the artists themselves? (I suspect not) Were the drawings by the identified cartoonists, in this case Herriman? (I suspect so) It is possible that the cartoonists Herriman and Segar at least approved the texts... and, of course, that they did write the articles.




In any case, this is an unpublished and interesting insight into Krazy Kat's kreation, and at least how the public might have perceived the character and strip apart from the funny section.

+   +   +        

Speaking of publicity departments, in the next installment of Yesterday's Papers I will continue the publication of behind-the-scenes bios and special art circa 1917, begun with treatment of Rudolph Block and Tom McNamara. The next installment will be the focus in that material on... George Herriman.
        

Friday, May 2, 2025

AN INSIDE LOOK INTO THE BULLPEN OF EARLY HEARST CARTOONISTS - I

 "A Half-Million Dollar Feature Service."

by Rick Marschall



The history of newspaper syndication -- and specifically the distribution of cartoons and comic strips -- is a story yet to be told, and told well. 

There are many misperceptions in the tale(s), some surprising turns, and motivations of various parties. It is a tale that involved creativity on the part of innocent cartoonists having their fun... cigar-chomping businessmen... and casual decisions that set the course of an industry.

Our look at one corner of this world, as it was created by a handful of gods, lifts a curtain or two. And it will provide a look at some of the earliest of cartooning stars in the orbit of William Randolph Hearst. The newspaper mogul was in a real sense one of comic strips' godfathers. Lesser but consequential members of that galaxy are Rudolph Block, who will be represented here; and Moses Koenigsberg, a behind-the-scenes manager of the material we will share.

By the mid-'teens of the 20th century, syndication had become a side-effect of big-city newspapers and the spread of journalistic empires. But its growth was sloppy and disorganized -- or, as some historians might maintain, merely "organic." I will skate through history in generalities, because generalities are collections of truth without being adorned by details and statistics. 

Around 1884 the publisher S S McClure introduced the modern concept of syndication by securing agreements from authors like Robert Louis Stevenson to serialize chapters of new books to newspapers. The idea simultaneously promoted new books and attracted newspaper readers, especially if they bought papers to satiate their curiosity about each next episode. Charles Dickens and W M Thackeray had serialized their books in English publications in the same manner, but for weekely and monthly periodicals.

In the United States, small enterprises follow, modestly, McClure's lead, nut major syndication began in earnest almost by accident when newspaper titans Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer distributed their own material, generated by their flagship papers (in, respectively, New York and San Francisco; and New York) to other of their properties in between. The next step: the practice morphed into sales in smaller cities. Rural papers that could not afford their own high-salaried cartooning stars, or print full-color comic supplements, could sign syndication deals that gave them big-city patinas.

Smaller operations were de-facto syndicators: the World Color Printing Company and (ironically) several McClure-owned properties offered pre-printed material and full color sections to rural newspapers.

Another irony, or anomaly, is how the larger concerns of Hearst, Pulitzer, Col McCormack of the Chicago Tribune, and others, long regarded income from syndication as a minor consideration versus publicity, covering their costs of salaries and production, and consolidation of territorial monopolies.

(In a 1952 letter to Al Capp, Harold Gray recalled that long-held priority of syndicates. And in a 1937 King Features Syndicate internal corporate report, it held that even licensing and merchandising income was secondary compared to the publicity that accrued to client newspapers.) 

Back to the mid-'teens. 

The competition, particularly among their comics and cartoons, between Hearst and his rivals, had become so intense that some services had a surfeit of talent. By 1917 his comics operation filled the daily and Sunday pages of the dozen papers in the Hearst chain.  A few years earlier the Hearst organization had spun off Buster Brown, Little Nemo, Polly and Her Pals, and other strips under a purportedly rival umbrella, the Newspaper Feature Service. This enabled Hearst papers to run two comic sections every weekend, perhaps one on Saturday, or to provide Hearst rivals in certain cities with their own comic sections that didn't appear to be generated by Hearst! (In New York City, for instance, Hearst's deadly competitor the New York Tribune was able to run a four-page NFS color comic section that appeared to readers to be the Trib's own.)

By 1917, Hearst's lieutenant Moses Koenigsberg split up the syndicate operations even further. Eventually there was King Features, a sort of holding company or sales agent for all the syndicates; Central Press Association; International Feature Service, Newspaper Feature Service; and others. The material we will be sharing here and over subsequent weeks is from a rare book published for prospective clients by the International Feature Service.



The book in my collection was once the property of the Hearst cartoonist Tom McNamara, whose bio and drawings are featured therein. His name and address (in the Bronx) are featured on the cover, and Tom designed a colophon in colored pencil and affixed it to the cover. 

There is also a page devoted to a brief bio and a photograph of one of Hearst's chief lieutenants, an architect of two decades of Hearst comic-strip activities. Rudolph Block was editor of comic sections and cartoons; he suggested many ideas for the cartoonists; and directed promotions and themes. He might be better remembered today if he had not been -- evidently -- a bastard to work with. Some time ago in Yesterday's Papers I wrote about him:
 
Rudolph Block was a de facto director of the Comic Art departments in the Hearst enterprises. He was talented enough (in his "other life" he was a short-story and Yiddish-theater writer as Bruno Lessing) and Hearst relied on him. But by a lot of evidence in my research I could find no cartoonist who did not bristle under his tutelage. Block was the real reason that Rudolph Dirks took Hans and Fritz, and his Katzenjammer Kids, to Hearst's rival, the Pulitzer chain. I have a letter by Frederick Opper (Happy Hooligan) to Block's successor expressing relief that Block was gone. When I interviewed the daughter of R F Outcault (The Yellow Kid; Buster Brown) the sweet, diminutive, 96-year-old lady responded to my question about whether she knew anything of her father's relations with Block. She leaned forward and said, "My father though he was a son of a bitch."

And a similar story about why Frank Willard did not remain with Hearst as Billy DeBeck did: Ferd Johnson told me that Block interfered and criticized Willard so much that one day "he punched Block in the face." Of course the cartoonist parted from Hearst; returned to Chicago, and, now with the Tribune, he created Moon Mullins.

... and so forth!

So to an extent this book was a panegyric to Block / Lessing. However, after the first spread, the pages were devoted to the cartoonists (and feature writers) of IFS. 



Out of deference to Tom McNamara, this installment will feature his page, his bio and photo. McNamara was not the most accomplished of cartoonists, and his several strips through the years were only of moderate success. Us Boys, On Our Block, and other titles for Hearst were minor presences in the daily and Sunday sections. He later drew Teddy, Jack, and Mary for the Chicago Tribune Syndicate with less credit, losing in a famous poll of readers.

But McNamara was accomplished in other fields. He scripted many plots on the Hal Roach lot, most notably many Our Gang comedies. And he was a great friend and frequent companion of cartoonists. I have letters that Hearst Editor Arthur Brisbane wrote him, suggesting gags for his strips; and George Herriman was a particular friend. He addressed his letters to McNamara "Dear Rubber Nose," and this book was acquired from Herriman's daughter among letters, sketches, and photographs in my collection by the creator of Krazy Kat. 

One regret about this great book is the space taken up by the awful drivel of text. What could have been valuable documentary information is a minimum of that, and awful poetry carrying promotional foofaraw. We will, however, take what we can get. After all, this represented a "half-million dollar feature service." 





The blank spots and the penciled Xs suggest that McNamara was supposed to draw more of his characters, besides Skinny Shaner and Shrimp Flynn. Perhaps he was out on a bender at deadline time,or simply overslept. He was one of Us Boys in the Hearst stable.



Monday, December 3, 2018