Oh for sweet Christ’s sake!
Posted: July 24, 2013 Filed under: no | Tags: don't be that guy, don't make this weird Comments Off on Oh for sweet Christ’s sake!Do not attempt to be TUMBLR, WordPress! Tumblr is over. Tumblr’s been over since 5 minutes after it began, if you ask the Tumblrati, but as for normal people–even normal people know Tumblr’s been really, truly over since Yahoo bought it.
OF COURSE I WANT TO MAKE A TEXT POST. OF COURSE I WANT IT TO HAVE A TITLE. WHAT ON EARTH MADE YOU THINK I MIGHT COME HERE TO POST VIDEO? Stoppppp!
Many are the people who are old, but not dead. Many are they who retain purchasing power; many are they who will sigh only briefly at thine ads.. BLESSED ARE THEY WHO TAKETH NOT THE SELFIES, nor post them ostentatiously.
Jackass I live with discovers “system restore”
Posted: August 30, 2011 Filed under: no | Tags: system restore: the last refuge of idiots Comments Off on Jackass I live with discovers “system restore”MOVE.
MOVE, I said.
More junior league Victorians
Posted: August 29, 2011 Filed under: class, laugh Comments Off on More junior league VictoriansLaughing fit to kill at this. Way to miss the point!
Lady, that Tumblr you are reading is not called Midwest Mountain MATURITY*, for one; for two–oh, I can’t be bothered with two. Your indignant defensive posture on behalf of a pop star has been duly noted and [see title of this blog] appropriately disposed.
Besides, as it seems like I’ve been saying a lot in the last 24 hours, she’s right.
*And good heavens I do so hate to be vulgar, but doesn’t that sound like the name of a laxative? “Midwest Mountain Maturity: Regularity from the Rockies.”
This is also why I wanted to start a ‘Junior League Victorians’ Tumblr once or, I am tired of your bougie prescriptions for ‘healing’
Posted: August 29, 2011 Filed under: abuse and assault | Tags: if people would just stop tempting me back to tumblr Comments Off on This is also why I wanted to start a ‘Junior League Victorians’ Tumblr once or, I am tired of your bougie prescriptions for ‘healing’So fine, this is now a strontiumchienne appreciation blog:
You’re not necessarily going to like what you hear. People who have been through ugly experiences have ugly things to report. Sometimes they’re not able to do it completely straight and they have to use distance, sometimes they can’t do it at all, they just come across as fucked up or entire parts of language are blocked off to them just as they are to you. Sometimes there’s a mental block and they can’t even remember what put it there cause it’s been blocked out.
Does every abuse survivor have a duty to only ever come out with beautiful shining truths about their experience? Or at all? Do they even have to talk about it? Are they banned from describing ugly things? Do they have to explicitly say “of course it’s bad” or do they assume most people actually know this? What makes rape this illuminating experience where suddenly only profound truths about human relationships come out of your mouth? Abuse is something that fucks you up.
I don’t know how many times I’ve been told “if you knew from experience you’d talk differently and you’d understand”, by people who didn’t think to ask whether I actually knew from experience. Not that it’s any of anyone’s business, and the other thing is that no one should be in a position where they should be forced to talk about it. Where they should be is in a position where they can talk about it, using any part of language they feel is appropriate. And you never know if it’s from experience cause they also don’t have a duty to reveal this.
In truth, I’m getting the impression that the real question is “how could any lady have anything to do with this?”
What would any lady have to do with something so sordid? Pinky-lift, nose-wrinkle, delicate blanch of distaste.
Exactly. Exactly.
Ew, turnips
Posted: August 29, 2011 Filed under: words and meaning Comments Off on Ew, turnipsIf I could find my copy of Anne of the Island, I’d post here the excerpt in which Anne says she “loves” a house, and the old lady she’s trying to lease it from says, do you really love it? Young girls nowadays say they “love” things a lot, but in my day, one did not say she “loved” broccoli the way she would say she loved her savior.
Wait, it was turnips!
“Then — then we are too late,” said Anne sorrowfully. “You’ve let it to some one else?”
“No, but we have decided not to let it at all.”
“Oh, I’m so sorry,” exclaimed Anne impulsively. “I love this place so. I did hope we could have got it.”
Then did Miss Patty lay down her knitting, take off her specs, rub them, put them on again, and for the first time look at Anne as at a human being. The other lady followed her example so perfectly that she might as well have been a reflection in a mirror.
“You LOVE it,” said Miss Patty with emphasis. “Does that mean that you really LOVE it? Or that you merely like the looks of it? The girls nowadays indulge in such exaggerated statements that one never can tell what they DO mean. It wasn’t so in my young days. THEN a girl did not say she LOVED turnips, in just the same tone as she might have said she loved her mother or her Savior.”
And I mean, I cracked up at that, because GUILTY. I do that all the time. “I love this!” No, I don’t. I just like it a whole lot.
So I get that words change and “miss” might not mean what it once did, okay?
But I don’t have to like it.
And get off my lawn. I’m not leasing Patty’s Place to you, gingermuff.
Branded like cattle
Posted: August 29, 2011 Filed under: no | Tags: this is what happens when a generation grows up thinking they have 600 'friends' Comments Off on Branded like cattleWas dinking around on the internet the other night, and came across someone saying they “missed Ilyka.” I honestly don’t remember who it was; I do remember curling my lip and complaining boyfriend-ward, “They always say that, but they don’t mean it.”
Evidence to support this position, before you label me ungrateful:
- I’m right here.
- “Right here” is actually “totally fucking searchable; you should try it sometime, dumbass.”
- Pretty sure at least 75% of the time someone has faux-lamented my absence, it’s been someone who has my email address.
- At least 100% of the time, I’m pretty sure it’s been someone who at the very least knows someone else they could hit up for my email address.
I mean Jesus, you’d think I was six feet under and not right here on WordPress.
What I finally figured out people mean when they say this: They mean “I wish so-and-so”–because it isn’t just me this goes on with, I’m sure–“I wish so-and-so was still on [my preferred social media platform].” They mean it the exact same way they would mean, “I wish Trader Joe’s still carried [product Trader Joe’s no longer carries].” They don’t miss me, or most people, I would wager, the way you truly miss a person. They miss people making themselves convenient, accessible, available to them. They miss people “producing content” for them.
FOR FREE. I don’t know about you, but I call that “entitlement.”
“Why aren’t you on this shelf anymore, Ilyka?” Yeah, that’s a real fuckin’ mystery, isn’t it? Start the coffee; we’re going to be here all night trying to figure this one out.
How about “Because I’m not a product?” How about “Because I don’t exist for your convenience?” How about you get my name out of your mouth if you can’t even do a simple Gmail search for my address?
That’s what deeply sick about personal branding, okay? It’s dehumanizing. I don’t have to be “grateful” for that, ever. I definitely don’t have to miss you back.
I’m a bitch, but I’m a fair bitch
Posted: August 29, 2011 Filed under: abuse and assault, laugh | Tags: also ned stark: worst detective ever, can't you just see him on CSI, solving approximately zero crimes per season Comments Off on I’m a bitch, but I’m a fair bitchSo, fine, I liked this a lot.
What? I did. Oh, shut up.
Those books are terrible! I’ve read the first four, have the fifth, but I made a terrible mistake before starting A Dance with Dragons: I read an entirely different book, a not-authored-by-George R. R. Martin book, that was actually good, or anyway I liked it, and now I canNOT go back to the shitty writing. Not yet, at least. I mean, I’ve tried, but:
The night was rank with the smell of man.
The warg stopped beneath a tree and sniffed, his grey-brown fur dappled by shadow. A sigh of piney wind brought the man-scent to him, over fainter smells that spoke of fox and hare, seal and stag, even wolf. Those were man-smells too, the warg knew; the stink of old skins, dead and sour, near drowned beneath ;akfjldsfdskjl;dasfjl;kadfskj;l STOPPPPPPPPPPP ITTTTTTTT.
It’s a piney wind that smells of three dozen other things; what say we list them all? Won’t that be fun? Animals have better senses of smell than we do, so I think I’m just going to take that cunning observation and beat you over the head with it until you recognize my genius.
And I mean, wargs–no. I just can’t with that shit, right now. Eventually I’ll be in the mood for something junky and twee again, and I’ll get back into it, but look, I’m sorry, she’s right about this*:
The problem is not that these books are “grim.” If anything, the “grim,” anyone-can-die plotty aspect is the one thing that kept me reading. (I do think that hailing these books as masterful looks at human nature or realpolitik, just because there are lots of rapes and murders and mutilations, is fundamentally adolescent; “no, it’s not just a fantasy book about dragons, like little kids read! Look, there’s violence! That’s for grown-ups! Also, did you know my Mom lets me watch R-rated movies sometimes?”) And the quality of writing in the books just isn’t very good in any other regard. I mean, dear God, the WRITING: The fakey, pseudo-British, Ren Faire approximation of “olden tymes” speech. The paper-thin, stereotypical characterizations. The presence of painfully obvious Nerd Identification Characters. (Tyrion and his endless, self-aggrandizing self-pity — he’s so much smarter than everyone else! But hot girls won’t fuck him! And nobody likes him enough! But he’s smarter than everyone else! Everybody SUCKS for not liking/wanting to fuck Tyrion! — is clearly designed to appeal to that specific variety of misogynist nerd who’s convinced that he’s always the smartest guy in the room, and is endlessly bitter that people aren’t sufficiently impressed by him and that women specifically don’t reward his brilliance with constant blow-jobs and praise. Or, there’s Sam and his “I’m unattractive, and not good at
sportsuh, combat, and I like to read about dragons, and I get picked onin schooluh, the night’s watch; GEE, I WONDER IF I’LL TURN OUT TO BE SOME KIND OF UNLIKELY HERO IN THIS HERE FANTASY NOVEL WRITTEN FOR GUYS JUST LIKE ME” schtick, which just never stops being grating.) The redundant, redundant redundancy — how many times does Sam have to use the word “craven” per scene? — and the often laughably bad, cliched or awkward dialogue…. This is not great literature. It’s a series of potboilers and page-turners. And that’s fine, but it’s also fine to acknowledge that they are only appealing on the level of “what happens next,” and Martin can only keep up the “anything can happen next” schtick if he’s willing to let horrible things happen to the protagonists. So I don’t object to that, at all.It’s not the grimness. It’s the stereotypical grimness of what happens to all of the female characters. Along with the stereotypical characterizations of the female characters. This is specifically gendered, and sexist, and it’s off-putting. Sure, fine: Show me Vargo Hoat eating his own chopped-off feet. Show me seven-year-olds being pushed out of windows. Show me all the grim shit you want. But if you can’t think of anything more interesting to threaten a female character with than “and then somebody tried to rape her,” over and over, to EVERY female character, AND you show rape as hot or romantic in some instances, I have every right to roll my eyes and call you creepy until the cows come home.
As for the righteously indignant Tumblr that wanted to finger-wag that “any feminist who thinks that post is funny should be ashamed of herself,” oh, go soak your head; that post was (1) hilarious, (2) well-written, and (3) mercifully free of finger-wagging and shaming and misapplied social justice concepts like, oh, I don’t know, treating “feminism” as a finishing school for potential rape victims? I mean what else should I be ashamed of, headmistress? Liking what the fuck I like, finding creepy and poorly written what I find creepy and poorly written? Big NO MEANS NO to that, I’m afraid.
–plus, damnit, everyone is out to molest Sansa. The problem is not in pointing that out–no, not even in pointing that out in a jokey way, sorry!–the problem is that everyone is out to molest Sansa, and more than once, the author clearly intends for you, the reader, to be fine with that, even delighted about that (hiiiiiii Tyrion! Morning, Sandor!).
So, no: Sady Doyle is not your problem there. You might ask yourself why you seemingly need her to be your problem, when all that gratuitous, glorified rape/incest/rape-incest/childfucking is sitting RIGHT THERE, being a massive problem already. You know? You might think on it.
This is what I think: I’m not inclined to tell survivors how to talk about this stuff. Survivors get to use every tool they have, including flippancy, including jokes, including anything that isn’t directly, maliciously targeted to hurt others, to get by. But I’m no one’s therapist. No one’s headmistress, either. (Dean of Feminism: Now there’s a job no one should ever want. And yet so many do, and so many of them are on Tumblr.)
But the basics, kids. Can we please revisit the basics.
Tangential re: these books, having nothing to do with all the rape/incest/rape-incest/childfucking, thank heavens: My boyfriend could not believe it when I told him about Hodor. Could not believe it.
“So he has to find some way to get this kid with bad legs from point A to point B. So, Hodor. But he can’t have Hodor be halfwitted AND mute, that would be overkill, and people would go, ‘You know, Hodor’s really not much of a character; Hodor may as well be a crudely constructed medieval wheelchair; also, wow, is this ableist.’ So he gives Hodor dialogue and has Hodor pipe up every now and then, so you don’t start confusing Hodor with the furniture, but on the other hand, there are already so many characters that he has to kill half of them off just to keep it manageable, and by ‘manageable’ I mean ‘under 2000 pages,’ so I think by the time he got around to really needing Hodor, albeit as a Bran-conveyor, he was maybe character-created out? Plus he’s already established that Hodor is brain-damaged, so Hodor can’t suddenly be a fountain of wit and erudition. So the end result is that Hodor’s dialogue consists of the word ‘Hodor.’ His name, yeah. His dialogue is his name. And now I dread the Bran chapters, because I know it’s going to be pages and pages of ‘Hodor?’ ‘Hodor,’ or ‘HODOR!’ if he’s really scared or something. Hodor, Hodor, Hodor–”
–and he’s just looking at me while I’m saying all this, and finally he’s like, you’re kidding.
“No,” I said, “he really does that. You have to read these books! I have to talk to someone about how terrible they are.”
*Other things she’s right about, in no particular order: . . . no, in that post, I’m sorry, it’s everything. I think I was going to single out how annoying and incompetent and I-am-but-a-womb-with-legs Catelyn Stark is–Catelyn Stark practically started the whole goddamn war, but I’m supposed to love her for her fierce if fumbling displays of Mama Bear Love? I won’t, you can’t make me. Oh, or how Aryan Jesus Daenerys is, or how forced the whole Arya thing feels–also, why do Arya’s feelings for her half-brother always seem to have an aura of romance about them WAIT, I THINK I KNOW THIS ONE–and I only just noticed now that “Arya” is “Aryan” without the “n,” which I think is just unfortunate coincidence, but on the other hand, yes: These books are very, very white, which I also think Sady addresses really well, but let’s gloss over that because ohnoes, she behaved impertinently towards your fandom, and didn’t apply the proper Serious Face when discussing Sansa.
I mean how will people know you take things seriously if you don’t put on your Serious Face first?! And where’s the goddamn triangle? Where’s the “This Journal is Sansa-Positive” triangle? How do I know this is safe space without the triangle?
Anyway, no, it is not just those characters. It’s everything.
Dear Strontiumchienne, May Your Days Be Filled with Meringues and Barbells and Nail Polish
Posted: August 29, 2011 Filed under: class, power Comments Off on Dear Strontiumchienne, May Your Days Be Filled with Meringues and Barbells and Nail PolishAnd whatever else you like, seriously:
“Progressives” talk about something called “the abused voice” quite often, and how we should listen to it. I suppose the idea is that “the abused voice” would always tell the truth and would always have “progressive” views. Think about what a young Russian woman might have had to go through to get to the United States. In those days, it wasn’t simply a matter of hopping on a plane (it isn’t for the majority of the world’s population these days either). When you read Ayn Rand, there is a good chance what you are reading is “the abused voice”. There’s no rule that says that voice has to be clear and pure and say only good things, in fact, that’s creepy as fuck, to expect that. That’s like seeing abuse as a remedy, a great clarifying influence.
I’ve
been
wanting
to say this
for
YEARS
–but I was afraid it would get me labeled An Ayn Rand Apologist and just . . . it’s not that. It’s not that simple.
Like, look: I don’t need to know very much about Adolf Hitler (let’s just Godwin this post immediately! Why not?) to know he was a bad guy. I don’t need to know which way he liked the toilet paper to hang or which was his favorite color, right? It’s immaterial. So I’m not bothered by people who throw up the Ayn Rand quote about American Indians and go, “Right, I’m DONE. This is literally all I need to know about this bitch.”
That doesn’t bother me one bit. I’m all for saving time for more worthwhile pursuits in life.
What has always bothered me is right up there. It’s the way centrist liberals will say “Ayn Rand” as a stand-in–a lazy stand-in–for “evil bitch” or “bad person” or even “Republican.” Maybe I’m being nitpicky by pointing out that Ayn wasn’t much for Republicans, and maybe it’s wrong that it’s always bothered me that this was someone who fled a country in which she and her family were literally starving, only to get here and find that your Humphrey Bogart liberal class did not want to hear it, wouldn’t hear it. It couldn’t be true; the New York Times said there is no famine. You’re making it up.
And I just do not know anyone who wouldn’t be made a little fucking crazy by that experience. Maybe not Ayn’s level of crazy, okay, but don’t let a fucking middle class liberal in the U.S. walk up to me and say “I could go through all those same things, I could suffer just as much, and I would still support social justice!” or “I would still be a proud progressive!” because PLEASE. You stop being for social justice or for progressivism the minute your neighborhoods get a little too colorful, the minute you stop getting a refund on your income tax, the minute the kids in the cafe are a little too rowdy–the minute the least little thing goes sour for you, it’s “Wow, fuck everybody,” except in the most abstract ways–like, you’ll urge people to vote for better conditions but excuse us all if we wonder privately whether you actually vote for them, and let’s be real, you like the programs and projects best that don’t cost you anything, that take it out of someone else’s pocket. Bonus points if they can be run from Twitter.
And then you want to tell me you’d flee a childhood of eating soap and be all “Yay, social justice!” and you aren’t even a good enough person to support a fucking transit workers’ strike because you think $55,000 a year ought to be good enough money for a job that requires “very little education?” Yeah fuck YOU, insert notbuyingit.gif here, etc.
But really: I don’t think most progressives would have done any better. I have heaps of awful ugly examples that suggest a few them might even do worse.
Also, I doubt this will be very popular:
The consequence of women’s studies? Well, if femininity is a socially constructed “essence of the woman”, if the oppression (for want of a better word) of women comes from the essentialism that construes them as feminine, then you’ve got women’s studies departments, full of people saying “actually, you’re not feminine, you’re a proper Woman, get roaring now”. What you’re getting is a kind of A=A, tautological femininity. Cause, the women there are coming from a background of being taught to be proper women. Now they’re being taught to be proper women squared. They learn about concepts like “freedom of choice”, “agency”, “intersection of oppressions”, “knowing your privilege”, knowing how you have the magical soul of a woman. And, at the end of the day, what they are is a finishing school. Where, back in the day, you had finishing schools to make good wives, women’s studies departments are finishing schools for potential rape victims.
–but it makes sense to me. I can’t really explain Shakesville any other way. Or Schwyzer, for that matter.
Your gods and your work
Posted: July 13, 2011 Filed under: power, relationships, work | Tags: people's lives, ron swanson, tourists Comments Off on Your gods and your work“Everything okay, Knope?”
“My boyfriend is a lawyer, and he’s smart and interesting, and there’s a lot of things about him I like . . . but he acted like a real jerk today. I don’t know. There’s something about the way he . . . treats people, or something?”
“He’s a tourist. He vacations in people’s lives, takes pictures, puts ’em in his scrapbook, and moves on. All he’s interested in are stories.”
“Huh.”
“Basically, Leslie, he’s selfish. And you’re not, and that’s why you don’t like him.”
The trickiest part of this post will be, as it is in most posts, not going off on multiple tangents. So I will spare you the tangent about how a confirmed television-hater got into Parks and Recreation except to say this: It was at least partly from amusement at the way all these die-hard feminist liberal ladies would go nuts over the character of Ron Swanson.
Ooh, Ron Swanson! Breakfast meats!
I mean: When Ron Swanson’s dialogue came out of Ayn Rand’s mouth, it was horrible! the worst! diabolical! evil! But Nick Offerman as Ron Swanson says the exact same shit, and swoon, he’s dreeeeeamy. Not that internalized misogyny exists or anything! But I thought this was hilarious. It still is, sometimes.
Then I got to this episode, midway through season 2, and I got it: Ron gets to say all the things white liberals think, but can’t admit that they think, let alone say. Ron has enough occasional insights to make up for four episodes of driveling dialogue from all the other characters.
This one tops them all: He’s a tourist. He vacations in people’s lives. With those two lines, a character on a network television show got right to the heart of my issue with white feminists.
When I’ve tried to have this conversation with white feminists who have initially seemed receptive to it, I’ve always hit this wall with them that I call But, Art. But, Art is a wall at least six feet thick and two miles high. Nothing gets past But, Art except white-feminist-approved Art. Everything else gets to die screaming before or behind it, and fuck them for trying to desecrate Art, am I right?
Sometimes But, Art calls itself But, Journalism; or But, Writing; or But, My Work; or But, Knowledge–it isn’t actually important what follows the “But,”. What matters is that there is a but.
What matters is that if you ever counter any declaration that you have hurt people with any variation of “But,” (a few examples: “Well,” “Except,” “And yet,” “Only,” “It’s just,”), you need to admit something to yourself: You believe in God.
Your god is called Art or Writing or Slutwalk or The Movement or Herstory or Poetry or even just My Work, even a thousand other things–My Blog, perhaps, which is a nice one, because when people take it too seriously and expect things from it, as patrons would from art, you get to go, “It’s Just a Blog!” like, how dare you expect softness and minimal shredding from your toilet paper? It’s just TP! Five hundred years ago, we used leaves!
But you do, actually, believe in that god, and your worship of that god has blinded you to the otherwise normal, natural recognition of the needs of your fellow human beings. dealwithit.gif.
Do you really think it’s okay to share another woman’s story when she’s expressly asked you not to? Or (because this is more the white feminist way) do you think it’s at least up for debate whether it’s okay?–Then you believe in a god called Journalism.
Go on and do it, but admit a little thing, first: You are not atheists. You believe in gods. Your gods are as capricious and vengeful as any gods have ever been, but they are always on the side of white. They have that much in common with the European old gods–yeah, even the ones who frown on abortion and enthusiastic consent and women who show ankles and whatever all else warmed-over Victorian-ladies shit y’all claim to care about: Your gods are not that different. Your gods are not renegades. They do as much harm, and the reason you don’t care is that they do it to people who are not you. This does not make you better.
I wrote an angsty little piece once about my (I thought) complicated relationship with art. That relationship just became a lot less complicated thanks to a character on television and whatever words the writer put in his mouth.
I am aware of the irony: It’s totally possible the writer only recalled the words of a friend in college, or of a stoner friend, a dropout friend, a nonvalued friend who would never notice the theft or, if he did, could be bought off with NBC lawyer money–it is possible those words were stolen at worst and borrowed at best. It is possible the writer only dropped half-recalled words into Ron Swanson’s mouth. I realize that.
I realize, too, that this is exactly the point at which the more academically-minded people will launch the fuck off into tedious discussions about Well, Okay, But Then Where Do You Draw the Line? and I Agree With Some of This, But Not All (My Nuance, Let Me Show You It)–and never mentioned and at once erased will be my central question, which is:
Is this okay when it’s your life?
If it’s not okay when it’s your life then when, if ever, is it okay when it’s someone else’s? Do you view humans as resources? Which humans? Why?
If your work, or Work, if you prefer (you do), requires the blood and bone of another human being, and that other human being does not endorse your (no-doubt skilled! artful! creative! transcendent!) use of those materials,
fuck your art.
And fuck your gods, too.
No good art was ever made without empathy.
It is not coincidental that so much of white people’s (art/poetry/writing/work/performance/etc.) depends upon a pronounced and obscene lack of empathy. It is not an accident. It does not just happen. It is not to be blamed on the zeitgeist.
It is that you are selfish, and those of us who are not do not like you.
Now there’s a pithy pop-culture-y quote to explain why we do not like you. Perhaps that will penetrate. If not, it may comfort those of us who always knew there was something not right about you, but couldn’t quite figure out what.
You are tourists. You vacation in people’s lives. You take photos, put ’em in your scrapbook, and move on. All you’re interested in are stories. You don’t care if they’re yours to tell. That’s irrelevant to the god of Your Art, who demands ever-more bloody and spectacular sacrifice from people who are not you. It will look so nice in your scrapbooks.

Oh, FLAURENCE
Posted: July 6, 2011 | Author: ilyka | Filed under: no | Tags: a rose for miss emily, commenter "florence" equals "founder of feministe Lauren", etc., howdy-do miss havisham, old home week forever, that's the kind of blog it's become, to simplify it for the rest of y'all: | Comments Off on Oh, FLAURENCEWhen I think of all the things I could say, this is all I really want to say:
Oh, FLAURENCE. Who do you think you are kidding. Really. Really, now. I miss 2005 sometimes myself, but PLEASE. You don’t even go here.