In 1962, a couple with their son move to Derry, Maine just as a young boy disappears. With their arrival, very bad things begin to happen in the town.In 1962, a couple with their son move to Derry, Maine just as a young boy disappears. With their arrival, very bad things begin to happen in the town.In 1962, a couple with their son move to Derry, Maine just as a young boy disappears. With their arrival, very bad things begin to happen in the town.
- Awards
- 1 win & 2 nominations total
Browse episodes
Summary
Reviewers praise 'IT: Welcome to Derry' for its atmosphere, suspense, and expansion of Stephen King's universe. Rich storytelling, haunting tone, and strong performances are highlighted. However, criticisms include overuse of CGI, weak acting, and pacing issues. Some find it derivative or unoriginal, drawing unfavorable comparisons to 'Stranger Things'. Despite mixed opinions, the series is noted for its potential to engage horror fans and expand the lore of Derry and Pennywise.
Featured reviews
I genuinely didn't know how to feel at first. Some episodes are bonkers, some interesting, some slow, and some downright stupid. The acting is mixed and the pacing uneven. And yet, after a few episodes, I was counting down the days until each new release. Skarsgård absolutely nails it - his presence (and that dance) lingers in your nightmares. Frustrating, flawed, but strangely addictive. I'm actually disappointed it's over!
This new chapter of IT takes a noticeably different approach, and for the most part, it is a "Welcome" one. The use of CGI will likely be a point of debate, but here it feels far more controlled and purposeful than in the previous films. Rather than relying on visual effects purely for shock value, the CGI works to support the atmosphere and scale of the horror. In that sense, it represents a clear technical upgrade from IT Chapter 1 and 2.
Compared to the earlier IT films, this entry feels more controlled in its storytelling. While pacing issues have not disappeared entirely, they are handled with more consistency, allowing tension to develop instead of constantly resetting itself. The film shows more patience in letting ideas and atmosphere settle, and it makes a clearer effort to explore where Pennywise comes from and why it exists. That added context gives the horror more weight without losing its mystery.
The most notable improvement lies in the type of horror being explored. Instead of relying primarily on jump scares, the film leans into body horror and psychological unease. Jump scares are still present and occasionally predictable, but they are no longer the main driver of fear. The emphasis on discomfort and lingering dread creates a more effective and mature horror experience. Centering the story on Pennywise proves to be a strong creative choice. It allows the narrative to feel tighter and more cohesive, and the smaller plot threads integrate naturally without feeling forced. The film feels confident in its direction, building atmosphere rather than rushing toward the next scare. The cinematography and lighting are handled with care, using angles and shadow to strengthen the tension and mood throughout.
Overall, this entry feels like a more assured step forward for the franchise. It is not flawless, particularly in its pacing, but it demonstrates a clearer understanding of its identity and tone.
I am the eater of worlds!
Compared to the earlier IT films, this entry feels more controlled in its storytelling. While pacing issues have not disappeared entirely, they are handled with more consistency, allowing tension to develop instead of constantly resetting itself. The film shows more patience in letting ideas and atmosphere settle, and it makes a clearer effort to explore where Pennywise comes from and why it exists. That added context gives the horror more weight without losing its mystery.
The most notable improvement lies in the type of horror being explored. Instead of relying primarily on jump scares, the film leans into body horror and psychological unease. Jump scares are still present and occasionally predictable, but they are no longer the main driver of fear. The emphasis on discomfort and lingering dread creates a more effective and mature horror experience. Centering the story on Pennywise proves to be a strong creative choice. It allows the narrative to feel tighter and more cohesive, and the smaller plot threads integrate naturally without feeling forced. The film feels confident in its direction, building atmosphere rather than rushing toward the next scare. The cinematography and lighting are handled with care, using angles and shadow to strengthen the tension and mood throughout.
Overall, this entry feels like a more assured step forward for the franchise. It is not flawless, particularly in its pacing, but it demonstrates a clearer understanding of its identity and tone.
I am the eater of worlds!
The introduction was great and compelling. They did a good job on the character development, and the plot of the show. However, getting towards the end, it was starting to get stale. It felt like the kids didn't feel very compelling to me, because I was losing interest in the kids characters towards the end. I can say the conclusion was heartfelt, and it gave us a cliff hanger for chapter 2 to tie in.
Overall, it was a decent show. It wasn't bad, but it wasn't great.
Overall, it was a decent show. It wasn't bad, but it wasn't great.
Unlike rubbish like Rings of Power, Wheel of Time, et al, IT: Welcome to Derry succeeds because the writers have obviously read and loved the source. Why wouldn't you?
On top of that, whomever these writers are gets 80s horror novels, and like those pull no punches. If by the end of the first episode you haven't got the point - this is horror as it was meant to be.
If you're not horrified it probably means you lack empathy for every poor souls throughtout.
Skarsgard's return gives him much more space and unlike the films where he felt outshined by Tim Curry, here he really gets to shine and he's brilliantly malevolent.
After the awful 90s where none of the kids can act and ruined so many tv shows here they're on brilliant form.
Only thing letting it down is some of the CGI.
On top of that, whomever these writers are gets 80s horror novels, and like those pull no punches. If by the end of the first episode you haven't got the point - this is horror as it was meant to be.
If you're not horrified it probably means you lack empathy for every poor souls throughtout.
Skarsgard's return gives him much more space and unlike the films where he felt outshined by Tim Curry, here he really gets to shine and he's brilliantly malevolent.
After the awful 90s where none of the kids can act and ruined so many tv shows here they're on brilliant form.
Only thing letting it down is some of the CGI.
The series is much better than the two recent films. While still relying on CG-heavy scares, it leans into being more creepy and unsettling in effective ways, evoking the same feeling as the original TV mini-series. Every plotline is genuinely interesting and the story culminates in a natural way that leaves you desperate for Season 2.
Our 2025 TV Guide
Our 2025 TV Guide
Take a peek at the biggest new and returning series coming to your screens in 2025, including new seasons of "Pluribus," "Percy Jackson," and the series finale of "Stranger Things."
Did you know
- TriviaAccording to director Andy Muschietti, Bill Skarsgård was "hesitant" to return as Pennywise because "he had played a lot of very dark characters... it takes a toll to live in the head of those characters for a long time." However, Skarsgård finally agreed because he was interested in exploring Pennywise's backstory as Bob Gray.
- Crazy creditsThe title sequence is made of pleasant paintings of Derry with IT in them, as they slowly become more violent and nightmarish.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Half in the Bag: Halloween Hangover (2025) (2025)
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- IT: Welcome to Derry
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h(60 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content






