IMDb RATING
4.7/10
1.1K
YOUR RATING
This is NOT ABCs of Death 3. ABCs of Death 2.5 showcases an additional top 26 finalists, providing fans 85 minutes of unadulterated madness.This is NOT ABCs of Death 3. ABCs of Death 2.5 showcases an additional top 26 finalists, providing fans 85 minutes of unadulterated madness.This is NOT ABCs of Death 3. ABCs of Death 2.5 showcases an additional top 26 finalists, providing fans 85 minutes of unadulterated madness.
Inah de Carvalho
- The Mother (segment "M is for Mailbox")
- (as Iná de Carvalho)
Featured reviews
Technically, this shouldn't be counted as one of the pieces of the original series cause there are a couple of reasons backing up this verdict. For one, this time the shorts are collected from fan entries around the globe as opposed to submissions from professional filmmakers. And two, it doesn't obey the alphabetical pattern of the last two; instead, they have decided to only employ the letter 'M'.
Not only did this particular decision influence the established format of this conception, but it also constrained all the creators from an artistic point of view as well as from boundlessly exhibiting their skills and creativeness. While the clips themselves aren't anything terrible, it's rather the quality on a collective level that took an apparent hit this time around as the gradual degradation in their typical standards is quite observable.
Not only did this particular decision influence the established format of this conception, but it also constrained all the creators from an artistic point of view as well as from boundlessly exhibiting their skills and creativeness. While the clips themselves aren't anything terrible, it's rather the quality on a collective level that took an apparent hit this time around as the gradual degradation in their typical standards is quite observable.
This was a major disappointment. If you're going to compare this one to the other two, you will be let down tremendously.
Everything in this movie looked very ameture. It's almost as if the scenes were the ones that didn't make the cut for the other ABCs of death. Everything was cheesy and very low budget. The other two movies made you at least cringe, had you overly disgusted, or were laughable. All I could do with this movie is roll my eyes.
I do not recommend this movie if you've happened to see parts one and two.
Everything in this movie looked very ameture. It's almost as if the scenes were the ones that didn't make the cut for the other ABCs of death. Everything was cheesy and very low budget. The other two movies made you at least cringe, had you overly disgusted, or were laughable. All I could do with this movie is roll my eyes.
I do not recommend this movie if you've happened to see parts one and two.
Were as the first two entries did deliver pure gore and horror this next part in the franchise isn't the best. It do offer some gory moments but there also shorts that make you go, what is this and what has it to do with the ABC franchise.
All shorts are only 3 minutes long and so you have to put all the segments to make it a horror or a watchable flick into those moments. And that's the problem with this compilation. There are parts that like the first one you are thinking oh yes, this is gonna be a hell of a ride because it did contain gore but also absurd moments. And there are a few with that kind of story. Just have a look at ABC 1 and 2. The time the short take were overall longer and you were sucked into the story. here you are left sometimes with a bitter feeling, it's like these shorts were leftovers.
It do has a bit of gore here and there but I can't say that it is something of a gore galore compilation. Just another mediocre entry.
Gore 1/5 Nudity 0,5/5 Effects 2,5/5 Story 2/5 Comedy 0/5
All shorts are only 3 minutes long and so you have to put all the segments to make it a horror or a watchable flick into those moments. And that's the problem with this compilation. There are parts that like the first one you are thinking oh yes, this is gonna be a hell of a ride because it did contain gore but also absurd moments. And there are a few with that kind of story. Just have a look at ABC 1 and 2. The time the short take were overall longer and you were sucked into the story. here you are left sometimes with a bitter feeling, it's like these shorts were leftovers.
It do has a bit of gore here and there but I can't say that it is something of a gore galore compilation. Just another mediocre entry.
Gore 1/5 Nudity 0,5/5 Effects 2,5/5 Story 2/5 Comedy 0/5
I haven't even seen this yet but i'm going to address the idiots in the room:
THIS FILM IS NOT A SEQUEL OR A CONTINUANCE IN THE SERIES. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULLS.
This is a composition of "Finalists" whose features did not make the cut. This is not Part 3, these are submissions/Entrants that didn't make the final cut.
For those saying it wasn't as good as the original or 2nd entry, to you I say: NO S#it!! You mongrels.
Clearly it isn't as good, otherwise they would have made the final cut. How stupid are all of you that you can't even comprehend what you are criticising.
Welcome to the idiotic age of millenials.
THIS FILM IS NOT A SEQUEL OR A CONTINUANCE IN THE SERIES. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULLS.
This is a composition of "Finalists" whose features did not make the cut. This is not Part 3, these are submissions/Entrants that didn't make the final cut.
For those saying it wasn't as good as the original or 2nd entry, to you I say: NO S#it!! You mongrels.
Clearly it isn't as good, otherwise they would have made the final cut. How stupid are all of you that you can't even comprehend what you are criticising.
Welcome to the idiotic age of millenials.
The challenge was to make a horror short of three minutes or less, inspired by the letter 'M'. Over 500 entries were submitted from around the globe, of which 26 finalists were compiled to make The ABC's of Death 2.5.
With such a short run-time in which to try and tell a story, the majority of 2.5's episodes prove predictably insubstantial, mere excuses for the film-makers to be as bizarre or outrageously gross as possible ('M is for Munging' being the winner there!). And as much as I enjoy the occasional spot of weirdness or gratuitous splatter, this rapid-fire collection left me longing for something a little more coherent.
Of the 26 entries, only a handful manage to impress: opening effort 'M is for Magnetic Tape' delivers a fun premise and some great special effects, 'M is for Malnutrition' ends with a neat Twilight Zone style twist, 'M is for Morman Missionaries' has a warped EC comics style payoff, and 'M is for Mother' features a big-ass spider.
The rest of the entries left me either disappointed or scratching my head in bewilderment.
With such a short run-time in which to try and tell a story, the majority of 2.5's episodes prove predictably insubstantial, mere excuses for the film-makers to be as bizarre or outrageously gross as possible ('M is for Munging' being the winner there!). And as much as I enjoy the occasional spot of weirdness or gratuitous splatter, this rapid-fire collection left me longing for something a little more coherent.
Of the 26 entries, only a handful manage to impress: opening effort 'M is for Magnetic Tape' delivers a fun premise and some great special effects, 'M is for Malnutrition' ends with a neat Twilight Zone style twist, 'M is for Morman Missionaries' has a warped EC comics style payoff, and 'M is for Mother' features a big-ass spider.
The rest of the entries left me either disappointed or scratching my head in bewilderment.
Did you know
- TriviaThe official poster has a redundant apostrophe before the S on "ABCs" which is a common mistake people make, but it means the artist didn't even take five minutes to look at the previous "ABCs of Death" posters to make sure they were doing it right.
- ConnectionsEdited from M Is for Marriage (2013)
- How long is ABCs of Death 2.5?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 25 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content