Leaving D.C.
- 2012
- 1 h 17 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,1/10
2,1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaAfter 20 years in DC, Mark Klein moves to remote West Virginia seeking peace. He sends videos to his OCD group back home, but soon suspects he's being watched from the surrounding endless wo... Ler tudoAfter 20 years in DC, Mark Klein moves to remote West Virginia seeking peace. He sends videos to his OCD group back home, but soon suspects he's being watched from the surrounding endless woods.After 20 years in DC, Mark Klein moves to remote West Virginia seeking peace. He sends videos to his OCD group back home, but soon suspects he's being watched from the surrounding endless woods.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
Avaliações em destaque
One of those micro budget, one man movies that actually works as a found footage and its spooky from beginning to end.
Shows that if you have a good idea, you can make a fun little movie that overall its better and more enjoyable than some bigger budget flops.
I was very impressed by this "one man band" version of found footage horror films.
Josh Criss does a great job of keeping you engaged and slowly building suspense. It all feels real, which is key to a successful found footage film.
This is essentially a story about a troubled man, who moves out to the middle of nowhere to escape the hustle and bustle of city living, but becomes obsessed with the odd happenings occuring late at night in the woods surrounding his new home.
It's an intriguing film, mostly for its simplicity, but also for its understanding that less is often more when it comes to building suspense, and budget is not much of a factor or excuse anymore, when rating a film's quality. If Josh Criss can do it with a camcorder and no dough, why can't hollywood?
Josh Criss does a great job of keeping you engaged and slowly building suspense. It all feels real, which is key to a successful found footage film.
This is essentially a story about a troubled man, who moves out to the middle of nowhere to escape the hustle and bustle of city living, but becomes obsessed with the odd happenings occuring late at night in the woods surrounding his new home.
It's an intriguing film, mostly for its simplicity, but also for its understanding that less is often more when it comes to building suspense, and budget is not much of a factor or excuse anymore, when rating a film's quality. If Josh Criss can do it with a camcorder and no dough, why can't hollywood?
Really creepy and well done. Kept me entertained throughout the whole film. Definitely give it a shot if you are into found footage films.
Right after watching Leaving D.C., which was strangely entertaining I have to admit, I told my wife this looked like a movie that was homemade by a guy that has some knowledge of modern technology, filming, and sound editing. After looking it up on IMDb I see that's exactly what happened. The writer, director and amateur actor is Josh Criss, he basically did everything by himself, probably got bored one day and thought it would be a great idea to make a movie by himself. Handycam movies are normally really not my thing, they always look so amateuristic but in this case it wasn't that bad. Josh Criss, the main and almost only character, acts pretty good, even though is role was to act as normal as possible, but that's also acting if you ask me. There is some mystery, that makes you keep watching, maybe a bit too repetitive at times, but entertaining enough to stay interesting. I would have scored it with a seven if it was not for the ending that I found a bit disappointing. Overall it wasn't a bad job for a man alone, better than some big budget productions.
I love found footage films. They're just the best types of movies - and ironically they cost next to nothing to make, so we should have thousands of them. 'Leaving D. C.' is a great example of how effective these films can be. There's nothing more than a creepy concept and the thought in the back of our minds about what could be out there, and yet it is infinitely more scary than most of the big-budget horror being made today.
What you don't see is always more scary than what you do. This film understands that and it is a large reason why it works so well. Sure we see a little bit, but only ever enough to know that something is messed up, never enough to know exactly what it is.
Even at only 77 minutes it can get a little repetitive in parts. Also the ending is going to be a little bit of let down for some. It works, but it is very abrupt and kind of over before you know it. A little more of a drawn out final sequences would have been nice.
Otherwise though I had a great time with this movie. I was on the edge of my seat the whole time and that is something I can't say about enough horror movies these days. 8/10.
What you don't see is always more scary than what you do. This film understands that and it is a large reason why it works so well. Sure we see a little bit, but only ever enough to know that something is messed up, never enough to know exactly what it is.
Even at only 77 minutes it can get a little repetitive in parts. Also the ending is going to be a little bit of let down for some. It works, but it is very abrupt and kind of over before you know it. A little more of a drawn out final sequences would have been nice.
Otherwise though I had a great time with this movie. I was on the edge of my seat the whole time and that is something I can't say about enough horror movies these days. 8/10.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesAnole, the fictional West Virginia town the lead character moves to, is an anagram for "alone"; the fictional West Virginia county it lies within, Tomere, is an anagram for "remote."
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Покидая Вашингтон
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 17 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Leaving D.C. (2012) officially released in India in English?
Responda