AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,0/10
45 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Um homem que precisa de dinheiro participa de um jogo em que ricos sádicos apostam em quem sobreviverá durante um torneio de roleta russa.Um homem que precisa de dinheiro participa de um jogo em que ricos sádicos apostam em quem sobreviverá durante um torneio de roleta russa.Um homem que precisa de dinheiro participa de um jogo em que ricos sádicos apostam em quem sobreviverá durante um torneio de roleta russa.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 1 indicação no total
Alice Barrett-Mitchell
- Leanne Ferro
- (as Alice Barrett Mitchell)
Mike D'Onofrio
- Frank
- (as Michael D'Onofrio)
Avaliações em destaque
I can't say this is a good movie, despite the fine cast, but you sure as heck are never bored and can't take your eyes off till the end. My favorite part: A game where the contestants execute each other has an official doctor !!!! Must have gone to a bad medical school.
I really don't understand how movies like this get made. Step one, half ass a cast together of "big names" and provide a silly premise.
Step two, give someone top billing even though their role is the lesser part of 5 minutes.
Step three, find a rapper that has no talent so that your culturally bereft urban youth have a reason to see the movie.
Step four,rely upon arty cinematography as the culturalification of the movie, legitimizing that its no better than a bottom shelf rental.
Alright, get the idea? movies these days suck, no wonder I won't pay to see one.
Step two, give someone top billing even though their role is the lesser part of 5 minutes.
Step three, find a rapper that has no talent so that your culturally bereft urban youth have a reason to see the movie.
Step four,rely upon arty cinematography as the culturalification of the movie, legitimizing that its no better than a bottom shelf rental.
Alright, get the idea? movies these days suck, no wonder I won't pay to see one.
"All players, eyes on the bulb, when it lights up you shoot." After a impulse decision to steal a man's identity, Vince (Riley) becomes a contestant in a game of Russian roulette. The winner gets a little more then a million, the loser...dies. Never having seen the original I wasn't sure what to expect, and honestly I watched this because of Statham. The beginning was a little slow, but when the game started it really picked up and was interesting and very disturbing at the same time. Comparing this to "Death Race" I think is acceptable as it involves people doing their best to survive in a grotesque game. While "Death Race" was about cars and you had more of a separation from the killing, this one is in your face. Spin the chamber, cock the hammer, point at someone's head, while someone does the same to you, then shoot. Either you live for next round or you don't. This is a pretty good movie with a good cast (not counting 50 Cent) and is a neat idea. I just think it was missing something. I think it was making you feel for the characters. You just don't seem to care who lives or dies, and that hurts the movie. Overall, an entertaining movie that is worth watching, if for no other reason then morbid curiosity. I give it a B-.
Would I watch again? - I don't think so.
*Also try - Death Race 1 & 2
Would I watch again? - I don't think so.
*Also try - Death Race 1 & 2
The plot: Bewildered young man stumbles into a tense game of chance when he impetuously steals a dead man's invitation.
I really liked the original French movie, though I found it to be a little pretentious. The American remake excises all of the art house elements in favor of big name actors, a curiously extended back story for Mickey Rourke's character, and some really bizarre (but awesome) acting from Michael Shannon. The original French version was also a bit more bleak and nihilist, which I think was watered down for American version. Despite this, I've seen several people complain that this movie was too bleak and nihilist! Wow. I guess some people were expecting a traditional, by-the-numbers thriller with car chases and shoot-outs rather than a pensive, darker drama. Unfortunately, a lot of the tension was also streamlined out this version, though I might be misjudging because I already knew the plot. Still, the brutality and nihilism of the original, made all the starker by the black and white stock, really stuck with me, and I didn't feel as though I had quite the same experience when watching the remake.
I'm not one of those snobs who thinks that the original movie is always better than the remake, but, in this case, I think it's true. If I hadn't seen the original and liked it so much, I'd probably rate this a bit higher. Judged on its own merits, I think this is an enjoyable movie, but it doesn't live up to the original. For a movie billed as a thriller, it's lacking the tension that audiences expect, and, as a Jason Statham movie, it's lacking in Jason Statham scenes, which audiences will also expect. Despite my criticism and lukewarm rating, I still liked 13, and I'd probably recommend it to people who haven't seen the original. However, I'd highly recommend you see the original, instead. It's a better movie.
I really liked the original French movie, though I found it to be a little pretentious. The American remake excises all of the art house elements in favor of big name actors, a curiously extended back story for Mickey Rourke's character, and some really bizarre (but awesome) acting from Michael Shannon. The original French version was also a bit more bleak and nihilist, which I think was watered down for American version. Despite this, I've seen several people complain that this movie was too bleak and nihilist! Wow. I guess some people were expecting a traditional, by-the-numbers thriller with car chases and shoot-outs rather than a pensive, darker drama. Unfortunately, a lot of the tension was also streamlined out this version, though I might be misjudging because I already knew the plot. Still, the brutality and nihilism of the original, made all the starker by the black and white stock, really stuck with me, and I didn't feel as though I had quite the same experience when watching the remake.
I'm not one of those snobs who thinks that the original movie is always better than the remake, but, in this case, I think it's true. If I hadn't seen the original and liked it so much, I'd probably rate this a bit higher. Judged on its own merits, I think this is an enjoyable movie, but it doesn't live up to the original. For a movie billed as a thriller, it's lacking the tension that audiences expect, and, as a Jason Statham movie, it's lacking in Jason Statham scenes, which audiences will also expect. Despite my criticism and lukewarm rating, I still liked 13, and I'd probably recommend it to people who haven't seen the original. However, I'd highly recommend you see the original, instead. It's a better movie.
13 is the story of a naive young man assumes a dead man's identity and finds himself trapped in a underground world driven by greedy for power and violence. There, gangsters betting on other people's lives.
It is the American version of the French film "13 Tzameti" that I liked it very much but this rather gave me some smiles along. Beginning of the film where Vince is an electrician is too fast, we see him in glimpses when he connects two wires to a switch, Emmanuelle Chriqui appears for a few seconds but the good part is that True Blood fans have the chance to see Eric in another role than the vampire.
Sequences follow each other too smoothly and leaves the viewer thinking about the scenes and have to put them together to understand what is happening. Another remake which I think is pointless.
It is the American version of the French film "13 Tzameti" that I liked it very much but this rather gave me some smiles along. Beginning of the film where Vince is an electrician is too fast, we see him in glimpses when he connects two wires to a switch, Emmanuelle Chriqui appears for a few seconds but the good part is that True Blood fans have the chance to see Eric in another role than the vampire.
Sequences follow each other too smoothly and leaves the viewer thinking about the scenes and have to put them together to understand what is happening. Another remake which I think is pointless.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesChuck Zito is a former bodyguard for Mickey Rourke, and also worked as his stunt man for some of the martial arts scenes in Vingança à Queima-Roupa (1998).
- Erros de gravaçãoThe cylinder in a properly functioning revolver will not spin freely once closed. While normally correct, the double-action revolvers used for the competition were owned and distributed by the holder(s) of the competition, and were likely modified for use in the competition. The modification is a simple one, and considering the stakes and as a necessary element of the competition, it is very likely the modification was made. It is obvious during the competition, that the cylinders are, in fact, able to spin when closed, despite common functional design.
- Trilhas sonorasJUST BUSINESS
Performed by Phil Soussan
Written by Phil Soussan
Courtesy of Blue Cat Tales / ASCAP
Under license from PUSS IN BLUE RECORDS
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is 13?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 20.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 3.701.600
- Tempo de duração1 hora 31 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente