[go: up one dir, main page]

Szplug's Reviews > A Storm of Wings

A Storm of Wings by M. John Harrison
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1843184
's review

really liked it

Harrison had matured as a writer when he penned this sequel to The Pastel City - some nine years having passed in between - and it showed: he discarded or relegated to the background the weaker elements from the prior book and concentrated upon its, and his, strengths. Harrison has always excelled at painting atmospheric scapes and moods; at finding the sorrow and melancholy, the potentiality for loss and regret that is inherent in existence, in the passage of space through the straitening parameters of time, and wringing it forth onto the page - and doing so with crystalline prose. Thus the questing journeys and battle scenes that comprised the story arc of TPC have been mostly abandoned for the existential annals of a smattering of battered and wounded figures, shuffling through a tired and confused world - one bereft of purpose or hope, unable to read the past or divine the future - that suddenly finds itself challenged by an alien awareness. Harrison constructs A Storm of Wings in panels, dream sequences and buzz-bomb exchanges, where violence explodes off of the page and immediately subsides, where reality becomes progressively harder to distinguish from mirage - and all is tinged with the patina of listlessness that is Viriconium in the Evening. It's futuristic fantasy-science fiction with the arc-welding ambience of Neuromancer and the molting-matter creativity of The Street of Crocodiles blanketed by the dust of a creaking, rheumatic world à la Gene Wolfe.

In Storm Harrison brings back the strongest characters from the prior book - Tomb the Dwarf and Cellur the Birdlord - while replacing the brooding poet-warrior tegeus-Cromis with the more effective brooding dissolute aristocrat-assassin Galen Hornwrack; Queen Jane also remains, though she is a nominal figurehead, both politically and novelistically. He expands upon the apocryphal Methven aeronaut Benedict Paucemanly (last seen rocketing towards the Moon and now become very weird), and introduces a pair of characters from the Reborn Men, the Afternoon Culture personalities resurrected towards the end of The Pastel City to defeat the savage Northmen. The Reborn are a fascinating addition, humans trapped between the Afternoon and the Evening cultures, existing in a present day reality that is overlain with chimerical visions and hallucinations projected by the stirring, struggling memories of their pre-existing lives in a technologically rich, but morally decadent clime. Seemingly destined to overshadow the anemic denizens of the Eventide empire, the Reborn appear to be worryingly susceptible to mass insanity; meanwhile, a strange new religion - The Sign of the Locust - has arisen out of nowhere to infect the Viriconium citizenry with its alarming metaphysical doctrine. Into such troubled times comes a northern female Reborn bearing a man-sized insect head and incommunicable madness. The Pastel City powers come to suspect a disturbingly alar alien presence in the occluded northwestern wastes, one whose radically different ontology is seeking to surmount that of the Evening culture - and from this existential struggle the very fabric of reality is being torn asunder, awakening the demiurgical memories dormant in the earth's very bones. With these two irreconcilable verities assaulting each other, corporeal existence has begun to change - and the end result may well prove catastrophic for both native and invader.

This is a great book. I'm a fan of Harrison, especially the way he digs inside otherwise banal or routine situations and plucks out the peculiar, the touching, the sinister. His descriptive prowess is remarkable, and some of the set pieces - a metal-sailed vessel thrusting forth from a fogbound grey seaside, aflame and bloody and echoing with the crew's desperate shrieks, before the startled eyes of Hornwreck and company; a hallucinatory romp through a buzzing earthen maze; the honeycombed, amorphous twin of Viriconium shimmering amidst a barren continent - are fantastic. The bifurcation of the Reborn and their conflicting consciousnesses, the alien entities and their mosaic mindset, are deftly handled; and though at times the plot threatens to recede behind the rich and lustrous atmospheric prose, the one actually reinforces the other. A Storm of Wings is the case of the sequel bettering the original; and with its own followup, In Viriconium , this happy trend would continue.
9 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read A Storm of Wings.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 19, 2010 – Started Reading
October 19, 2010 – Shelved
Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Axolotl (new) - added it

Axolotl I like that you make the Gene Wolfe connection. Harrison and Wolfe have for a longtime been interlinked in my mind, I find their styles to be rather complementary.


Szplug It's a copacetic linkage for sure, Axolotl—and I've actually often extended it to include Jack Vance's Tales of the Dying Earth , which was the first, AFAICT, to make use of the idea of an aged, reddening sun of declining warmth and luminescence. While Vance is more humorous in his tale-telling, he shares with the other two a wonderful way with words and bountiful imaginative prowess.


message 3: by Axolotl (new) - added it

Axolotl It's a lineage no doubt. I've read a few of Vance's works and was delighted with all but two of them. It is unfortunately so true what Malcolm Edwards remarked about Vance that he'd often have so many ideas and the ability to sustain these ideas up to a certain point and then, as if a new idea would take up residence and he'd lose momentum with the former idea and sort of abandon it. Never had I noticed this pronounced "loss of interest" more markedly than in his Durdane (hope I'm spelling it correctly from memory) trilogy which consists of The Anome (a remarkable, rollicking sf fantasy, full of the characteristic Vance humor and deft storytelling), The Brave Free Men (again very good until somewhere towards the end) and The Asutra (a clumsy and disappointingly mediocre finale to what could have been a fine fine trilogy--as if he had just simply lost interest in the material). You're good at making these connections and I completely see where you're coming from. Vance writes of lush (both in flora, fauna and alien languages), flawed utopias paving the way to the more raw--yet no less detailed--sensibilities at work in the dystopian landscapes created by Harrison and Wolfe.


Szplug Thank you, Axolotl. I've actually had similar observations about Vance's work, though I've read less of it—Planet of Adventure and Araminta Station being the only other ones—in that he does seem to so overflowing in ideas that new tacks are continuously being taken. I've actually also come across a number of his readers who take issue with what they see as a misogyny that appears most often in rape themes (Cugel's actions with the mother and daughter from TotDE, for instance)—and this has been extended, in a few cases that I've encountered, unto Wolfe as well. I don't know if you're a male or female reader, but I'm curious if you've detected this and been bothered by it. Personally, while it vaguely penetrated my awareness, it nonetheless failed to deter me from thoroughly enjoying Vance's writing. The same thing transpired with Thomas Covenant's rape of Lena in the Chronicles—a repugnant act that apparently has dissuaded a large number of people from continuing with the series was, for me, a nasty but acceptable part of the fictional whole which Donaldson was constructing.

I hope that all of the above didn't launch itself upon too much of a tangent...


message 5: by Axolotl (last edited 29 jan. 2014 02:32) (new) - added it

Axolotl I'm an adult male homosapien.
This type of kitschy liberal arts college thinking will lead us all into the psych ward, I swear--which is, I'm certain, precisely its long-term aim.
The type of people you are referring to do not like literature or reading or taking pleasure in anything, what they enjoy is taking issue with things and taking up quixotic causes and picking things apart, as if a work of art were a rotten carcass--not that I consider genre fiction "high art" exactly (well it is now in most colleges and universities, kitschified as they are. Lucky for them, there are writers who defy the deserved stigma such as Harrison and Wolfe but really they do defy the term "genre" as we know it but it would be downgrading them beyond recognition to not say that they are merely content with merely trumping genre expectations/conventions--that is an incredibly minor part of what they--and writers like them--are up to) but I think you'll understand.
This is probably not the "PC" thing to say but in the context of a fictional narrative, rape doesn't bother me--it does on a narrative level--but it doesn't get me wondering "Gee, who is this loony writer, anyhow? How irresponsible of him/her to use a harrowing/despicable everyday horror and use it in his/her fictional work! The very thought!" or "I have the sneaking suspicion that this author might just be a redneck--uh...I mean rapist or at least someone sympathetic towards the act of rape" (like many politicians). However, in "real-life", I wouldn't say that I myself "have a good attitude about rape & rapists"; I hate it too, but, at the same time, I don't feel that "society's disapproval" will have much of an effect on the phenomena--if anything the disapproval only seems to exacerbate the problem--like in every sphere--fretting about fictional narratives seems a bit of crutch, honestly.
All one can realistically do is not rape people oneself.
I have far more important things to think about and do than worry about trifles like this: despicable acts in genre fiction or fiction in general.

Are you by any chance a liberal arts major?

It absolutely drives me nuts that narrow-minded, "PC" twits are invading the realms of fantasy with "interest groups" and axes to grind; reality is already almost unbearable, they really ought to stop reading, leave intelligent people alone and go join some sort of protest march or petition signing or something! It almost prompts one to hope for even more reprehensible and retrograde literature, knowingly written, simply in order to occupy such laughably puritanical buffoons out for nothing other than a good ol' fashioned witch-hunt.

I hope I didn't get off on too much of a tirade, this sort of thing really bothers me--I feel it is bad for everyone's "mental health".


Szplug Ha! Not too much of a tirade at all—in fact, I'd say that I'm within a shattered nerve of aligning myself on your side of the argument. I'm not a liberal arts major no, and, in truth, never attained any education beyond high school—so I've missed out on all the trends and argumentation and theoretical developments in university towards literature; in fact, before I discovered the internet, I'd never really undertaken a discussion of any book I'd read beyond fairly superficial impressions related to my enjoyment (or lack of) regarding it. Thus, the entire post-structural and identity group methodology for critiquing a book was alien to me until I'd discovered it in operation.

I've undertaken discussion with people in the past about Donaldson—not only about the rape that Covenant commits, but the far more egregious ones by Angus Thermopyle in his Gap series—and it concluded with my interlocutor convinced Donaldson has a rape fetish and must be an unpleasant man, while I insisted on the greater likelihood that he used rape, a typical (and horrible) male act (or primarily male) of aggression and domination against women (or other men) because he's exploring outlaw characters and power structures and themes of possession, and that it fits itself realistically in the doing so. I also have never yet encountered a repulsive act committed in fiction—and they've been plentiful—and made conclusions about the author's character, or psychological state, but only towards how it was situated within the story. And I've read some diatribes against Tolstoy, Faulkner, and Tartt, to name a few that come readily to mind, which flabbergasted me in what the person had found and reviled within the work in question.

I've since come to appreciate that such liberal college arts thinking, as you put, has provided me with some perspectives that I hadn't previously been aware of, but I'm resistant to incorporating it into my own appreciation for, and critiquing of, literature I've read. I'll also cop to the fact that it still gets my back-up when I come across it.


message 7: by Axolotl (new) - added it

Axolotl Great response. I thought you'd given me up. :)


Szplug Thanks, and sorry about that! Unfortunately, I'm an eminently distractible individual, and got tugged away into other threads—but I wanted to acknowledge, because I do share, some of the exasperation you expressed above, especially in that it likely has turned plenty of potential readers away from discovering the pleasures of writers like those we discussed above on their own merits.

And a confession: while I stated that I've never made conclusions about the author based upon the fictional mayhem they have wrought, that's not completely true—it proved the case that after reading a good chunk of Tomb for 500,000 Soldiers I was convinced that Pierre Guyotat was just flat-out disturbed....


message 9: by Axolotl (new) - added it

Axolotl I have a similar feeling with Bryan Smith's House of Blood--not sure why I read that one in the first place, actually--oh, yeah it was recommended to me as being very frightening by someone whom I respected the opinion of regarding these matters, in fact--but I just found it to be extremely pitiful, poorly-wrought sensationalism--I still feel bitter and robbed towards the author of such utter trash. But such are the battle wounds of attempting to "pan nuggets from the trash" as I am accustomed to do at certain times.


back to top