ccnet-devel Mailing List for CruiseControl.NET

>  maybe the nant solution task now supports installer projects -- anyone
tried? 

I dont think so, even that I dont have latest CVS version, I truly follow
NAnt's dev list. They have support for enterprice templates (whatever it is)
but not for installer projects yet. ProjectFactory could speed up its
development though.

Martin

While we talk : many installer packages these days (especially for web
apps) include self diagnostic at the end of the installation
procedure.

Definitely something we should consider I think, given the fact that
most issues are : improperly setup IIS rights, missing folders which
generates error 500, etc.

When we'll write the setup app for dashboard, we should embed nunitasp
or something of this kind to validate the installation (kind of
acceptance testing).


Thibaut

that's option #3
o.


---
R. Owen Rogers
ThoughtWorks Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd.

ThoughtWorks - Deliver with passion!

ThoughtWorks is always looking for talented people who are passionate=20
about technology.  To find out more about a career at ThoughtWorks go to=20
http://www.thoughtworks.com/career/.




Thibaut Barr=E8re <thi...@gm...>
25/11/2004 21:22
Please respond to Thibaut Barr=E8re
=20
        To:     Owen Rogers <or...@th...>
        cc:     ccn...@li...
        Subject:        Re: [Ccnet-devel] Re: Custom reporting / dashboard =

extension ?


> - one option is to try out craig andera's suggestion for implementing a
> self-installing service:
> http://pluralsight.com/wiki/default.aspx/Craig.SelfInstallingService=20
> - the other, just to get something up and going quickly, is to resurrect =

the
> visual studio installer projects.  it's pretty easy to set up a service
> installer.  maybe the nant solution task now supports installer projects =

--

what about the wix option ?

> - one option is to try out craig andera's suggestion for implementing a
> self-installing service:
> http://pluralsight.com/wiki/default.aspx/Craig.SelfInstallingService 
> - the other, just to get something up and going quickly, is to resurrect the
> visual studio installer projects.  it's pretty easy to set up a service
> installer.  maybe the nant solution task now supports installer projects --

what about the wix option ?

thanks vivek.  please coordinate with mike on this one as he's probably 
already started on it.  there's no jira for this yet -- though maybe there 
doesn't need to be as this is still new functionality.
cheers,
owen.

ps. donal: thanks for the bug report


---
R. Owen Rogers
ThoughtWorks Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd.

ThoughtWorks - Deliver with passion!

ThoughtWorks is always looking for talented people who are passionate 
about technology.  To find out more about a career at ThoughtWorks go to 
http://www.thoughtworks.com/career/.




"Vivek Vaid" <viv...@ya...>
Sent by: ccn...@li...
25/11/2004 11:54
Please respond to ccnet-devel
 
        To:     <ccn...@li...>
        cc:     (bcc: Owen Rogers/Canada/ThoughtWorks)
        Subject:        Re: [Ccnet-devel] More reporting features for 
Dashboard


Donal,

I'll take a look at it - is there a jira issue(s) open for this?

Cheers.. Vivek

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "McCarthy, Donal" <Don...@uk...>
To: <ccn...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Ccnet-devel] More reporting features for Dashboard


Mike,
I had a look a the CCNetLive and there are a couple of issues with the
new reports;

Test Details
------------
- There are broken images for check.jpg
- The scripts behind the clicks on the headings which allow details to
be collasped or shown don't work correctly.  The wrong divs get hidden
and shown...

Test Timings
------------
The timing report extends out to the right making it hard to see/use
even with high resolutions.  It would be good to find a way to break the
class names so that they don't push the times off the screen.  This
could be done by splitting out test names within namespaces so that the
view looks like:

ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.UnitTests

CCTrayLib.SettingsTest.ShouldUseCCNetManagementProxyWhenUsingWebServices
InSettings 0.371

WebDashboard.Dashboard.DefaultBuildNameFormatterTest.ShouldFormatPassedB
uildCorrectly 0.481

You could even sum up the test timings for each distinct namespace so it
is obvious which groups of tests are long running...

FxCop
-----
The cursor changes to one which impies you can type into the report.

NCover
------
It seems that NCover is not implemented on the CCNet build.  I'm quite
surprised to see the NCover link on the page.  Please can this not be
static!  The menu on the left should be driven by what is available in
the build log.  We have a different reports based on whether or not we
are building java or .net apps.  We even have summarised ncover stats
for big projects which use different xsl files.   It would be a real
shame to hardcode these report links in the dashboard, even for just a
single CCNet development iteration...

Cheers,
Donal

-----Original Message-----
From: ccn...@li...
[mailto:ccn...@li...] On Behalf Of Mike
Roberts
Sent: 22 November 2004 20:21
To: ccn...@li...
Subject: [Ccnet-devel] More reporting features for Dashboard

Hi all,

The Web Dashboard now includes all the reporting features available in
the old (single project) web application (Test Details, Test Timing,
FxCop, NCover). These changes can be seen on CCNetLive:

http://ccnetlive.thoughtworks.com/ccnet/controller.aspx?_action_ViewBuil
dReport=true&server=CCNetLive%201&project=CCNetLive%20-%20CCNet&build=lo
g20041122134548Lbuild.0_7_0_595.xml

If anyone is using the new dashboard reporting features and could test
these changes I would appreciate any feedback.

These changes are in the latest build from CCNetLive (595) :

http://ccnetlive.thoughtworks.com/CCNet-builds/0_7_0_595/

Cheers,

Mike

--
mike roberts | http://mikeroberts.thoughtworks.net/ |
http://www.thoughtworks.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Ccnet-devel mailing list
Ccn...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Ccnet-devel mailing list
Ccn...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Ccnet-devel mailing list
Ccn...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel

i have a slight preference for doing ccservice first.  ccservice is=20
something that people always have trouble installing and anything that we=20
can do to make the process easier would be great.
- one option is to try out craig andera's suggestion for implementing a=20
self-installing service:=20
http://pluralsight.com/wiki/default.aspx/Craig.SelfInstallingService
- the other, just to get something up and going quickly, is to resurrect=20
the visual studio installer projects.  it's pretty easy to set up a=20
service installer.  maybe the nant solution task now supports installer=20
projects -- anyone tried?

cheers,
owen.


---
R. Owen Rogers
ThoughtWorks Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd.

ThoughtWorks - Deliver with passion!

ThoughtWorks is always looking for talented people who are passionate=20
about technology.  To find out more about a career at ThoughtWorks go to=20
http://www.thoughtworks.com/career/.




Mike Roberts <mik...@gm...>
Sent by: ccn...@li...
25/11/2004 15:18
Please respond to ccnet-devel
=20
        To:     Thibaut Barr=E8re <thi...@gm...>
        cc:     ccn...@li..., (bcc: Owen=20
Rogers/Canada/ThoughtWorks)
        Subject:        [Ccnet-devel] Re: Custom reporting / dashboard=20
extension ?


Thanks!

Just a quick note on this for now - its the dashboard and command-line
server I care about initially, closely followed by the service.
Setting up a v-dir for the dashboard and a programs group shortcut to
start the server would be a big step forward.

After then we can worry about update concerns.

I don't propose to do any configuration in the MSI - that's what the
web dashboard should be for.

Mike

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:40:58 +0100, Thibaut Barr=E8re
<thi...@gm...> wrote:
> >- MSI install using Wix (If anyone wants to volunteer for this, it
> >would be a GREAT HELP! :) )
>=20
> I don't have plenty of time right now, but at least could have a first
> look, as I want to investigate on Wix anyway.
>=20
> Let's discuss what we should put under wix.
>=20


--=20
mike roberts | http://mikeroberts.thoughtworks.net/ |
http://www.thoughtworks.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.=20
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
Ccnet-devel mailing list
Ccn...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel

ok i'd start with the dashboard then.

at first I'm thinking about the following steps,  :
- checking requirements (IIS installed ?)
- asking where to put the dashboard instance
- setup the vdir in IIS
- testing the setup

tell me what you see more (there *are* more :-)


Thibaut

Thanks!

Just a quick note on this for now - its the dashboard and command-line
server I care about initially, closely followed by the service.
Setting up a v-dir for the dashboard and a programs group shortcut to
start the server would be a big step forward.

After then we can worry about update concerns.

I don't propose to do any configuration in the MSI - that's what the
web dashboard should be for.

Mike

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:40:58 +0100, Thibaut Barr=E8re
<thi...@gm...> wrote:
> >- MSI install using Wix (If anyone wants to volunteer for this, it
> >would be a GREAT HELP! :) )
>=20
> I don't have plenty of time right now, but at least could have a first
> look, as I want to investigate on Wix anyway.
>=20
> Let's discuss what we should put under wix.
>=20


--=20
mike roberts | http://mikeroberts.thoughtworks.net/ |
http://www.thoughtworks.com/

>- MSI install using Wix (If anyone wants to volunteer for this, it
>would be a GREAT HELP! :) )

I don't have plenty of time right now, but at least could have a first
look, as I want to investigate on Wix anyway.

Let's discuss what we should put under wix.

Donal,

I'll take a look at it - is there a jira issue(s) open for this?

Cheers.. Vivek

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "McCarthy, Donal" <Don...@uk...>
To: <ccn...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Ccnet-devel] More reporting features for Dashboard


Mike,
I had a look a the CCNetLive and there are a couple of issues with the
new reports;

Test Details
------------
- There are broken images for check.jpg
- The scripts behind the clicks on the headings which allow details to
be collasped or shown don't work correctly.  The wrong divs get hidden
and shown...

Test Timings
------------
The timing report extends out to the right making it hard to see/use
even with high resolutions.  It would be good to find a way to break the
class names so that they don't push the times off the screen.  This
could be done by splitting out test names within namespaces so that the
view looks like:

ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.UnitTests

CCTrayLib.SettingsTest.ShouldUseCCNetManagementProxyWhenUsingWebServices
InSettings 0.371

WebDashboard.Dashboard.DefaultBuildNameFormatterTest.ShouldFormatPassedB
uildCorrectly 0.481

You could even sum up the test timings for each distinct namespace so it
is obvious which groups of tests are long running...

FxCop
-----
The cursor changes to one which impies you can type into the report.

NCover
------
It seems that NCover is not implemented on the CCNet build.  I'm quite
surprised to see the NCover link on the page.  Please can this not be
static!  The menu on the left should be driven by what is available in
the build log.  We have a different reports based on whether or not we
are building java or .net apps.  We even have summarised ncover stats
for big projects which use different xsl files.   It would be a real
shame to hardcode these report links in the dashboard, even for just a
single CCNet development iteration...

Cheers,
Donal

-----Original Message-----
From: ccn...@li...
[mailto:ccn...@li...] On Behalf Of Mike
Roberts
Sent: 22 November 2004 20:21
To: ccn...@li...
Subject: [Ccnet-devel] More reporting features for Dashboard

Hi all,

The Web Dashboard now includes all the reporting features available in
the old (single project) web application (Test Details, Test Timing,
FxCop, NCover). These changes can be seen on CCNetLive:

http://ccnetlive.thoughtworks.com/ccnet/controller.aspx?_action_ViewBuil
dReport=true&server=CCNetLive%201&project=CCNetLive%20-%20CCNet&build=lo
g20041122134548Lbuild.0_7_0_595.xml

If anyone is using the new dashboard reporting features and could test
these changes I would appreciate any feedback.

These changes are in the latest build from CCNetLive (595) :

http://ccnetlive.thoughtworks.com/CCNet-builds/0_7_0_595/

Cheers,

Mike

--
mike roberts | http://mikeroberts.thoughtworks.net/ |
http://www.thoughtworks.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Ccnet-devel mailing list
Ccn...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Ccnet-devel mailing list
Ccn...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel

The short answer is 'yes', eventually. :) The long answer is a bit
more complicated...

In the last few days I've been thinking more about reporting. It would
be really nice to have reports for all kinds of things:
- How many builds did we do in total in our organisation last week?
- What percentage of the time are each of our build servers building?
- Who is the person that breaks the build least often?
- Can I see the FxCop covererage in a chart for all of my projects?

I've been thinking more about a 'domain model' for CCNet, and here we
see more parts of such a domain model, like:
- project
- build server
- build
- person (committer)
- metric

I think we should be able to report against any part of this domain
model. I think the Web Dashboard would be a great user interface for
it.

That's combined with last week when I was at a Microsoft session and
started to get sold on Service Oriented Architectures. I'd like to
introduce at some point the concept of a 'Reporting Service'. It would
be responsible for giving out any information, in various formats, of
any historical CCNet event. (NB - A 'Status Service' might give out
details of what's happening 'right now').

As such the Reporting Service would 'own' all the build logs, and
would have the ability to produce styled reports. It would also answer
as to what reports were available for any particular instance of the
above listed types. I'm thinking that we may use a relational
persistence scheme, allowing users to optionally use a Database for
persistence and so use their own reporting technologies as well (this
has already been requested!)

Separating user interface from report implementation would make adding
new reports *much* easier since no UI updates would be required.

NB - just because a Reporting Service is a separate logical component,
it would be optional whether to deploy it separately. Out of the box
CCNet would be as simple to use as always, and in this simple case the
Reporting Service would (probably) run in the same process as the
CCNet Server.

OK, all well and good, but when is this going to happen? Probably not
soon. The emphasis right now continues to be on:
- Replacing the old web app with the web dashboard
- Allowing users to configure CCNet solely through the Dashboard
- MSI install using Wix (If anyone wants to volunteer for this, it
would be a GREAT HELP! :) )

But the reporting stuff would be a lot of fun. :)

Hope that's useful,

Mike

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:34:38 +0100, Thibaut Barr=E8re
<thi...@gm...> wrote:
> As I'm starting to add NCover to the build process, I thought it would
> be nice to  have a place where I can see the test coverage state for
> all the projects at once (just a percentage figure like "95%"), so I
> can quickly decide if I should spend some time adding tests on the
> loosers of my hall of ncover-fame.
>=20
> Not sure where it leads yet, but should the dashboard be extended (or
> extensible) in some way to provide more reporting ? Or should there be
> another mechanism to build statistic informations ?
>=20
> just a thought
>=20
> Thibaut
>=20


--=20
mike roberts | http://mikeroberts.thoughtworks.net/ |
http://www.thoughtworks.com/

As I'm starting to add NCover to the build process, I thought it would
be nice to  have a place where I can see the test coverage state for
all the projects at once (just a percentage figure like "95%"), so I
can quickly decide if I should spend some time adding tests on the
loosers of my hall of ncover-fame.

Not sure where it leads yet, but should the dashboard be extended (or
extensible) in some way to provide more reporting ? Or should there be
another mechanism to build statistic informations ?

just a thought

Thibaut

Mike,
I had a look a the CCNetLive and there are a couple of issues with the
new reports;

Test Details
------------
- There are broken images for check.jpg
- The scripts behind the clicks on the headings which allow details to
be collasped or shown don't work correctly.  The wrong divs get hidden
and shown...

Test Timings
------------
The timing report extends out to the right making it hard to see/use
even with high resolutions.  It would be good to find a way to break the
class names so that they don't push the times off the screen.  This
could be done by splitting out test names within namespaces so that the
view looks like:

ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.UnitTests
=09
CCTrayLib.SettingsTest.ShouldUseCCNetManagementProxyWhenUsingWebServices
InSettings		0.371
=09
WebDashboard.Dashboard.DefaultBuildNameFormatterTest.ShouldFormatPassedB
uildCorrectly	0.481

You could even sum up the test timings for each distinct namespace so it
is obvious which groups of tests are long running...

FxCop
-----
The cursor changes to one which impies you can type into the report.

NCover
------
It seems that NCover is not implemented on the CCNet build.  I'm quite
surprised to see the NCover link on the page.  Please can this not be
static!  The menu on the left should be driven by what is available in
the build log.  We have a different reports based on whether or not we
are building java or .net apps.  We even have summarised ncover stats
for big projects which use different xsl files.   It would be a real
shame to hardcode these report links in the dashboard, even for just a
single CCNet development iteration...

Cheers,
Donal

-----Original Message-----
From: ccn...@li...
[mailto:ccn...@li...] On Behalf Of Mike
Roberts
Sent: 22 November 2004 20:21
To: ccn...@li...
Subject: [Ccnet-devel] More reporting features for Dashboard

Hi all,

The Web Dashboard now includes all the reporting features available in
the old (single project) web application (Test Details, Test Timing,
FxCop, NCover). These changes can be seen on CCNetLive:

http://ccnetlive.thoughtworks.com/ccnet/controller.aspx?_action_ViewBuil
dReport=3Dtrue&server=3DCCNetLive%201&project=3DCCNetLive%20-%20CCNet&bui=
ld=3Dlo
g20041122134548Lbuild.0_7_0_595.xml

If anyone is using the new dashboard reporting features and could test
these changes I would appreciate any feedback.

These changes are in the latest build from CCNetLive (595) :

http://ccnetlive.thoughtworks.com/CCNet-builds/0_7_0_595/

Cheers,

Mike

--
mike roberts | http://mikeroberts.thoughtworks.net/ |
http://www.thoughtworks.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.=20
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Ccnet-devel mailing list
Ccn...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel

I've added a Subversion AutoGetSource feature, in as of build 596. Are
there any Subversion users who could test this?

As with all the other SCMs, just add the following tag to get the
feature working:

<autoGetSource>true</autoGetSource>

At the moment this just does an 'svn update', using the most recent
revision number found in the modifications (or no revision number if
no modifications were found).

Cheers,

Mike

-- 
mike roberts | http://mikeroberts.thoughtworks.net/ |
http://www.thoughtworks.com/

Hi all,

The Web Dashboard now includes all the reporting features available in
the old (single project) web application (Test Details, Test Timing,
FxCop, NCover). These changes can be seen on CCNetLive:

http://ccnetlive.thoughtworks.com/ccnet/controller.aspx?_action_ViewBuildReport=true&server=CCNetLive%201&project=CCNetLive%20-%20CCNet&build=log20041122134548Lbuild.0_7_0_595.xml

If anyone is using the new dashboard reporting features and could test
these changes I would appreciate any feedback.

These changes are in the latest build from CCNetLive (595) :

http://ccnetlive.thoughtworks.com/CCNet-builds/0_7_0_595/

Cheers,

Mike

-- 
mike roberts | http://mikeroberts.thoughtworks.net/ |
http://www.thoughtworks.com/

hi martin,

> reminds me - what about to move modificationDelaySeconds to trigger? It 
is
property of trigger, isn't it?

not exactly.  the modificationDelaySeconds property is used to implement 
the quiet period for non-atomic source controls.  if you are using svn or 
perforce, you should never need to worry about this property.
the quiet period is a window of time during which detected modifications 
are considered to be at risk of being part of an ongoing commit.  to 
rephrase: if i'm using a non-atomic source control system like cvs and 
ccnet detects that files were checked in 2 seconds ago, i can't be sure 
whether or not there are more files to come as part of the current commit. 
 if i start a build at this point, it might break because the ccnet local 
workspace only some of the changed files.

hopes this clarifies things,
owen.

---
R. Owen Rogers
ThoughtWorks Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd.

ThoughtWorks - Deliver with passion!

ThoughtWorks is always looking for talented people who are passionate 
about technology.  To find out more about a career at ThoughtWorks go to 
http://www.thoughtworks.com/career/.




"Martin Aliger" <mar...@go...>
Sent by: ccn...@li...
18/11/2004 20:22
Please respond to ccnet-devel
 
        To:     "'Mike Roberts'" <mik...@gm...>
        cc:     <ccn...@li...>, (bcc: Owen 
Rogers/Canada/ThoughtWorks)
        Subject:        [Ccnet-devel] RE: [Ccnet-user] Source not checking 
out with StarTeam


Hi,

this

>     <triggers>
>       <pollingInterval seconds="60" />
>     </triggers>
>     <modificationDelaySeconds>120</modificationDelaySeconds>

reminds me - what about to move modificationDelaySeconds to trigger? It is
property of trigger, isn't it?

     <triggers>
       <pollingInterval seconds="60" modificationDelaySeconds="120"/>
     </triggers>

Martin Aliger
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccn...@li... 
> [mailto:ccn...@li...] On Behalf Of 
> Mike Roberts
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 2:39 AM
> To: Carlton Nettleton
> Cc: ccn...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Ccnet-user] Source not checking out with StarTeam
> 
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:05:51 -0800, Carlton Nettleton 
> <cne...@ac...> wrote:
> > It appears I cannot seem to get the source to check out of 
> StarTeam. 
> 
> Hi Carlton,
> 
> I assume you are using CruiseControl.NET 0.7?
> 
> I can't help much with the StarTeam problem - look at the 
> debug log on the CruiseControl.NET server process and see 
> that it is performing a 'starteam co', maybe try running this 
> process manually from the command line and see if it works.
> 
> > Also, no build is started when there has been a change to 
> the repository.  Did I forget to set something up?  How would 
> I tell CC.Net to wait 120 seconds (or whatever) after the 
> last check-in to execute a build?  Thank you in advance for 
> all your help.
> 
> You need a <triggers> section and a <modificationDelay> - see 
> http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Config
> uring+the+Server.
> 
> Something like the following should do you :
> 
>     <triggers>
>       <!-- Poll the SCM server every 60 seconds to see if 
> there are any updates -->
>       <pollingInterval seconds="60" />
>     </triggers>
> 
>     <!-- Wait at least 2 minutes before doing a build after 
> someone has checked anything in -->
>     <modificationDelaySeconds>120</modificationDelaySeconds>
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE 
> OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines 
> robust object and relational technologies, making it a 
> perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. 
> www.intersystems.com/match8 
> _______________________________________________
> Ccnet-user mailing list
> Ccn...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-user
> 
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
Ccnet-devel mailing list
Ccn...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel

Hi,

this

>     <triggers>
>       <pollingInterval seconds="60" />
>     </triggers>
>     <modificationDelaySeconds>120</modificationDelaySeconds>

reminds me - what about to move modificationDelaySeconds to trigger? It is
property of trigger, isn't it?

     <triggers>
       <pollingInterval seconds="60" modificationDelaySeconds="120"/>
     </triggers>

Martin Aliger
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccn...@li... 
> [mailto:ccn...@li...] On Behalf Of 
> Mike Roberts
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 2:39 AM
> To: Carlton Nettleton
> Cc: ccn...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Ccnet-user] Source not checking out with StarTeam
> 
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:05:51 -0800, Carlton Nettleton 
> <cne...@ac...> wrote:
> > It appears I cannot seem to get the source to check out of 
> StarTeam.  
> 
> Hi Carlton,
> 
> I assume you are using CruiseControl.NET 0.7?
> 
> I can't help much with the StarTeam problem - look at the 
> debug log on the CruiseControl.NET server process and see 
> that it is performing a 'starteam co', maybe try running this 
> process manually from the command line and see if it works.
> 
> > Also, no build is started when there has been a change to 
> the repository.  Did I forget to set something up?  How would 
> I tell CC.Net to wait 120 seconds (or whatever) after the 
> last check-in to execute a build?  Thank you in advance for 
> all your help.
> 
> You need a <triggers> section and a <modificationDelay> - see 
> http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Config
> uring+the+Server.
> 
> Something like the following should do you :
> 
>     <triggers>
>       <!-- Poll the SCM server every 60 seconds to see if 
> there are any updates -->
>       <pollingInterval seconds="60" />
>     </triggers>
> 
>     <!-- Wait at least 2 minutes before doing a build after 
> someone has checked anything in -->
>     <modificationDelaySeconds>120</modificationDelaySeconds>
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE 
> OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines 
> robust object and relational technologies, making it a 
> perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. 
> www.intersystems.com/match8 
> _______________________________________________
> Ccnet-user mailing list
> Ccn...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-user
> 
> 

Here's a patch for CCNET-251, relying on Thomas' first proposal, with
a unit test using data he provided to ensure we don't regress later.

I choosed to remove char 160 just like Thomas proposed, as it seems both good
enough and simple, plus I suspect we may meet this situation
again with other non-english vss (no french exception here ?;). If we
discover it's not good enough we'll move on to the (slightly) more
complex solutions.


Owen, can you check this versus an english VSS ?


cheers

Thibaut





On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:41:10 +0100, Thomas Bolon <tb...@ne...> wrote:
> I've created an issue on Jira for the bug, all information are included.
> 
> http://jira.public.thoughtworks.org/browse/CCNET-251
> 
> I've manually corrected this problem by removing any char(160) in entry in
> the VSSParser ctor by using this line after the entry initialization :
> 
> this.entry = this.entry.Replace(Convert.ToChar(160).ToString(), "");
> 
> I don't know if this solution is correct enough for a release build, but in
> my case it removes problems without any other modification.
> 
> I've suggested a better correction in the issue on Jira.
> 
> Thanks for your work.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
> FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
> robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
> for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
> _______________________________________________
> Ccnet-devel mailing list
> Ccn...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel
>

hi thomas,
thanks for raising this issue.  i didn't realise that french had specific 
punctuation rules for the colon :)
either of the two options you suggested is fine with me.  another option 
would be to change the resources to include the colon and the char 160 
(for french locales).  thibaut has volunteered to dig into this one.
cheers,
owen.

oh, and welcome to the project...


---
R. Owen Rogers
ThoughtWorks Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd.

ThoughtWorks - Deliver with passion!

ThoughtWorks is always looking for talented people who are passionate 
about technology.  To find out more about a career at ThoughtWorks go to 
http://www.thoughtworks.com/career/.




"Thomas Bolon" <tb...@ne...>
Sent by: ccn...@li...
16/11/2004 21:11
Please respond to ccnet-devel
 
        To:     <ccn...@li...>
        cc:     (bcc: Owen Rogers/Canada/ThoughtWorks)
        Subject:        RE: [Ccnet-devel] RegExp problem in 
VSSHistoryParser::ParseUsernameAndDate()


I've created an issue on Jira for the bug, all information are included.

http://jira.public.thoughtworks.org/browse/CCNET-251

I've manually corrected this problem by removing any char(160) in entry in
the VSSParser ctor by using this line after the entry initialization :

this.entry = this.entry.Replace(Convert.ToChar(160).ToString(), "");

I don't know if this solution is correct enough for a release build, but 
in
my case it removes problems without any other modification.

I've suggested a better correction in the issue on Jira.

Thanks for your work.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
Ccnet-devel mailing list
Ccn...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel

I've created an issue on Jira for the bug, all information are included.

http://jira.public.thoughtworks.org/browse/CCNET-251

I've manually corrected this problem by removing any char(160) in entry in
the VSSParser ctor by using this line after the entry initialization :

this.entry = this.entry.Replace(Convert.ToChar(160).ToString(), "");

I don't know if this solution is correct enough for a release build, but in
my case it removes problems without any other modification.

I've suggested a better correction in the issue on Jira.

Thanks for your work.

The latest available on sourceforge, aka .7

I'm using source version and build version, build for ccnettray and =
source
for debugging. Source version gives [assembly:
AssemblyVersionAttribute("0.7.0.571")] in CommonAssemblyInfo.cs

-----Message d'origine-----
De=A0: ccn...@li...
[mailto:ccn...@li...] De la part de Thibaut
Barr=E8re
Envoy=E9=A0: mardi 16 novembre 2004 12:25
=C0=A0: ccn...@li...
Cc=A0: Thomas Bolon
Objet=A0: Re: [Ccnet-devel] RegExp problem in
VSSHistoryParser::ParseUsernameAndDate()

Hi Thomas

first thanks for the feedback and investigating. Which version of
ccnet are you using ?

=20
> PS: Si je me r=E9f=E8re =E0 DNG, il semblerait que la team de =
d=E9veloppement soit
> fran=E7aise, je suis donc aussi disponible pour donner plus de =
d=E9tails en
> fran=E7ais.

the team is usually english speaking, only a few frogs down there ;)


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
Ccnet-devel mailing list
Ccn...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel

Hi Thomas

first thanks for the feedback and investigating. Which version of
ccnet are you using ?

=20
> PS: Si je me r=E9f=E8re =E0 DNG, il semblerait que la team de d=E9veloppe=
ment soit
> fran=E7aise, je suis donc aussi disponible pour donner plus de d=E9tails =
en
> fran=E7ais.

the team is usually english speaking, only a few frogs down there ;)

Hi,

=20

When I launch ccnet and force build my VSS project, the following =
exception
occurs : "Invalid data retrieved from VSS.  Unable to parse username and
date from text."=20

=20

I use VSS 6d and VS.NET 2003 in French for both (French os too)

=20

The following variables are set:

=20

entry : "*****  Tools.build  *****\nVersion 3\nUtilisateur : Thomas
Date : 15/11/04   Heure : 18:24\nArchiv=E9 dans =
$/Projets/Tools\nCommentaire:
\n\n"

=20

The RegExp doesn't seem to match this entry.

=20

Analysing the string deeper indicates one thing:

=20

In French, space between word and ':' isn't considered as a normal space
(char 32 decimal), but as a non-wrap character, which is encoded as char =
160
decimal.

=20

In consequence, to correctly match the string, the pattern must be =
replaced
by, in my case:

=20

"{0}\s?:(.+){1}\s?:(.+){2}\s?:(.+)$"

=20

Where "\s?" matches any white space character, but is optional =
(considering
the English case where space character isn't present).

=20

This particularity seems to cause other problems in other methods such =
as
::ParseFileNameOther(), where you search for
entry.IndexOf(locale.TimeKeyword + ":"); which cannot be found in this =
case.

=20

Two solutions could be envisaged:

- Change the code to accept char 160 between word and :

- Remove all the char 160 prior any string manipulation

=20

I'll modify the source code locally with the second one, waiting for an
official modification.

=20

Thanks.

=20

PS: Si je me r=E9f=E8re =E0 DNG, il semblerait que la team de =
d=E9veloppement soit
fran=E7aise, je suis donc aussi disponible pour donner plus de d=E9tails =
en
fran=E7ais.

=20

Thomas Bolon

NetFinances Services

=0CBuildfile: file:///E:/src/extern/ccnet/ccnet.build
Target(s) specified: test=20


init:


compile:

 [solution] Starting solution build.
 [solution] Building 'Remote' [build] ...
 [solution] Building 'WebService' [build] ...
 [solution] Building 'XMLRPCWebService' [build] ...
 [solution] Building 'WebServiceProxy' [build] ...
 [solution] Building 'core' [build] ...
 [solution] Building 'CCTrayLib' [build] ...
 [solution] Building 'WebDashboard' [build] ...
 [solution] Building 'web' [build] ...
 [solution] Building 'service' [build] ...
 [solution] Building 'CCTray' [build] ...
 [solution] Building 'console' [build] ...
 [solution] Building 'UnitTests' [build] ...
   [delete] Deleting file E:\src\extern\ccnet\build\server\echo.bat.
   [delete] Deleting file E:\src\extern\ccnet\build\server\fail.bat.
   [delete] Deleting file E:\src\extern\ccnet\build\server\ccnet.config.
   [delete] Deleting file E:\src\extern\ccnet\build\server\helloworld.build.
   [delete] Deleting file E:\src\extern\ccnet\build\server\PostBuildEvent.b=
at.
     [copy] Copying 0 files to 'E:\src\extern\ccnet\build\server\ccnet.exe.=
config'.
     [copy] Copying 0 files to 'E:\src\extern\ccnet\build\service\ccservice=
.exe.config'.

test.unit:

     [exec] ........................................................F......=
...........................................................................=
.........................N.................................................=
.F.
     [exec] ##### Unhandled Exception while running ThoughtWorks.CruiseCont=
rol.Core.Test.ProjectIntegratorTest.Abort
     [exec] System.Threading.ThreadAbortException: Thread was being aborted.
     [exec] ..
     [exec] ##### Unhandled Exception while running ThoughtWorks.CruiseCont=
rol.Core.Test.ProjectIntegratorTest.TerminateCalledTwice
     [exec] System.Threading.ThreadAbortException: Thread was being aborted.
     [exec] .[CruiseControl Server:Error]: INTERNAL ERROR:=20
     [exec]  MockIIntegratable.RunIntegration(ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Re=
mote.BuildCondition) called too many times
     [exec]=20
     [exec]  expected:<0>
     [exec]   but was:<1>
     [exec] ----------
     [exec] NMock.VerifyException:=20
     [exec]  MockIIntegratable.RunIntegration(ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Re=
mote.BuildCondition) called too many times
     [exec]=20
     [exec]  expected:<0>
     [exec]   but was:<1>
     [exec]    at NMock.MockNoCall.Call(String methodName, Object[] actualA=
rgs)
     [exec]    at NMock.Method.Call(Object[] parameters)
     [exec]    at NMock.Mock.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] args)
     [exec]    at ProxyIIntegratable=5F10.RunIntegration(BuildCondition )
     [exec]    at ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.ProjectIntegrator.Run() i=
n e:\src\extern\ccnet\project\core\ProjectIntegrator.cs:line 99
     [exec] ----------
     [exec]=20
     [exec]=20
     [exec] ##### Unhandled Exception while running ThoughtWorks.CruiseCont=
rol.Core.Test.ProjectIntegratorTest.ForceBuild
     [exec] System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationException: The type N=
Mock.VerifyException in Assembly nmock, Version=3D1.0.1721.15437, Culture=
=3Dneutral, PublicKeyToken=3Dnull is not marked as serializable.
     [exec] ............[CruiseControl Server:Error]: Cruise Server Was not=
 able to get a configuration
     [exec] .[CruiseControl Server:Error]: Cruise Server Was not able to ge=
t a configuration
     [exec] ..................[CruiseControl Server:Error]: Exception:=20
     [exec] ----------
     [exec] ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.CruiseControlException
     [exec]    at NMock.MockCall.Call(String methodName, Object[] actualArg=
s)
     [exec]    at NMock.Method.Call(Object[] parameters)
     [exec]    at NMock.Mock.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] args)
     [exec]    at ProxyISourceControl=5F4.GetModifications(DateTime , DateT=
ime )
     [exec]    at ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Project.GetSourceModifica=
tions(IIntegrationResult result) in e:\src\extern\ccnet\project\core\Projec=
t.cs:line 185
     [exec]    at ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Project.AttemptToRunInteg=
ration(IIntegrationResult result) in e:\src\extern\ccnet\project\core\Proje=
ct.cs:line 163
     [exec] ----------
     [exec]=20
     [exec] .[CruiseControl Server:Error]: Exception:=20
     [exec] ----------
     [exec] ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.CruiseControlException
     [exec]    at NMock.MockCall.Call(String methodName, Object[] actualArg=
s)
     [exec]    at NMock.Method.Call(Object[] parameters)
     [exec]    at NMock.Mock.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] args)
     [exec]    at ProxyISourceControl=5F4.GetModifications(DateTime , DateT=
ime )
     [exec]    at ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Project.GetSourceModifica=
tions(IIntegrationResult result) in e:\src\extern\ccnet\project\core\Projec=
t.cs:line 185
     [exec]    at ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Project.AttemptToRunInteg=
ration(IIntegrationResult result) in e:\src\extern\ccnet\project\core\Proje=
ct.cs:line 163
     [exec] ----------
     [exec]=20
     [exec] ............[CruiseControl Server:Error]: Exception: Exception =
thrown by publisher
     [exec] ----------
     [exec] ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.CruiseControlException: Excepti=
on thrown by publisher ---> NMock.VerifyException:=20
     [exec]  MockPublisherBase.PublishIntegrationResults(ThoughtWorks.Cruis=
eControl.Core.IProject, ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.IIntegrationResult)=
 called too many times
     [exec]=20
     [exec]  expected:<0>
     [exec]   but was:<1>
     [exec]    at NMock.Mock.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] args)
     [exec]    at ProxyPublisherBase=5F21.PublishIntegrationResults(IProjec=
t , IIntegrationResult )
     [exec]    at ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Publishers.PublisherBase.=
Project=5FIntegrationCompleted(Object source, IntegrationCompletedEventArgs=
 e) in e:\src\extern\ccnet\project\core\publishers\PublisherBase.cs:line 32
     [exec]    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
     [exec] ----------
     [exec]=20
     [exec] .[CruiseControl Server:Error]: Exception: Exception thrown by p=
ublisher
     [exec] ----------
     [exec] ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.CruiseControlException: Excepti=
on thrown by publisher ---> ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.CruiseControlEx=
ception: expected exception
     [exec]    at NMock.MockCall.Call(String methodName, Object[] actualArg=
s)
     [exec]    at NMock.Method.Call(Object[] parameters)
     [exec]    at NMock.Mock.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] args)
     [exec]    at ProxyPublisherBase=5F21.PublishIntegrationResults(IProjec=
t , IIntegrationResult )
     [exec]    at ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Publishers.PublisherBase.=
Project=5FIntegrationCompleted(Object source, IntegrationCompletedEventArgs=
 e) in e:\src\extern\ccnet\project\core\publishers\PublisherBase.cs:line 32
     [exec]    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
     [exec] ----------
     [exec]=20
     [exec] ...............................N....N..........................=
....................................doh!
     [exec] ..............F.........................................N......=
...............................................
     [exec] Tests run: 462, Failures: 3, Not run: 4, Time: 7,5787555 seconds
     [exec]=20
     [exec] Failures:
     [exec] 1) ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Sourcecontrol.Test.ClearCase=
Test.CanCreateHistoryProcess : System.FormatException : String was not reco=
gnized as a valid DateTime.
     [exec]    at System.DateTimeParse.Parse(String s, DateTimeFormatInfo d=
tfi, DateTimeStyles styles)
     [exec]    at System.DateTime.Parse(String s, IFormatProvider provider,=
 DateTimeStyles styles)
     [exec]    at System.DateTime.Parse(String s, IFormatProvider provider)
     [exec]    at System.DateTime.Parse(String s)
     [exec]    at ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Sourcecontrol.Test.ClearC=
aseTest.CanCreateHistoryProcess() in e:\src\extern\ccnet\project\core\sourc=
econtrol\test\ClearCaseTest.cs:line 147
     [exec]=20
     [exec] 2) ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Test.ProjectIntegratorTest.V=
erifySchedulerStateAfterException :=20
     [exec]    at ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Test.ProjectIntegratorTes=
t.VerifySchedulerStateAfterException() in e:\src\extern\ccnet\project\core\=
test\ProjectIntegratorTest.cs:line 147
     [exec]=20
     [exec] 3) ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Util.Test.ProcessExecutorTes=
t.StartProcessRunningCmdExeCallingNonExistentFile :=20
     [exec]  String lengths differ.  Expected length=3D97, but was length=
=3D100.
     [exec]  Strings differ at index 0.
     [exec] =20
     [exec]  expected:<"'zerk.exe' is not recognized as an ...">
     [exec]   but was:<"zerk.exe nen=A1 n=A0zvem vnit=FDn=A1ho ani ...">
     [exec]  -----------^
     [exec] =20
     [exec]    at ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Util.Test.ProcessExecutor=
Test.StartProcessRunningCmdExeCallingNonExistentFile() in e:\src\extern\ccn=
et\project\core\util\test\ProcessExecutorTest.cs:line 49
     [exec]=20
     [exec] Tests not run:
     [exec] 1) ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Sourcecontrol.Test.VaultTest=
.HistoryDates : user-specific vault test settings here
     [exec] 2) ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Tasks.Test.CoverageTaskInteg=
rationTest.LoadsNunitTaskAndDevEnvBuilder : Works when in config, but not i=
n test
     [exec] 3) ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Tasks.Test.NCoverCoverageTes=
t.ShouldCleanupAfterReporting : Need to fix this, and understand to use moc=
ks
     [exec] 4) ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Publishers.Test.NetSendPubli=
sherTest.Send : move to acceptance tests
     [exec]=20

BUILD FAILED

E:\src\extern\ccnet\ccnet.build(65,4):
External Program Failed: E:\src\extern\ccnet\tools\nunit\nunit-console.exe =
(return code was 1)

Total time: 9.4 seconds.

Cool! I tested it and all functions I use seems ok.

Only thing I found are test-cases during build from sources
CruiseControl.NET-0.7.source.zip. Several tests are failing, some becouse of
localization settings, some for other reasons. Complete output is attached.


Martin Aliger
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccn...@li... 
> [mailto:ccn...@li...] On Behalf Of 
> Mike Roberts
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 2:13 AM
> To: ccn...@li...
> Subject: [Ccnet-devel] CruiseControl.NET 0.7 Released
> 
> CruiseControl.NET 0.7 has been released. The following is 
> taken from the release notes at 
> http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/CCNet+
> 0.7+Release+Notes
> 
> --
> CruiseControl.NET 0.7 is one of our largest single releases 
> so far. If you are upgrading from 0.6.1 or earlier, there are 
> some big changes.
> Some updates are:
> 
>     * Web Dashboard now has reporting options, allowing one 
> web application instance to report multiple CruiseControl.NET 
> projects across multiple servers. This feature is still in 
> development, but see 
> http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Web+Da
> shboard+Reporting+Features
> for more details
>     * State Managers now automatically work for multi-project 
> servers (so you should be able to take them out of your 
> config file and forget about them!)
>     * The Xml log publisher now has default settings that 
> work for multi-project servers (so you should just need an 
> empty <xmllogger />
> tag.) File merging has been removed from the Xml Logger, so 
> you must use a File Merge Task for this behaviour.
>     * Some Source Control plugins can now automatically 
> update your source tree for you (so no need for bootstrap 
> builds). This feature is currently implemented by the CVS, 
> Perforce and Visual Source Safe plugins.
>     * New <triggers> section replaces old <schedule> (See
> http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Trigge
> r+Blocks)
>     * Introduction of 'Working Directory' and 'Artifact' as 
> Project-level concepts to make relative directories easier to use.
> More support for these concepts will be coming in later releases.
>     * Considerable documentation updates
> 
> We recommend that as part of upgrading that you backup your 
> current CCNet directories, and then read the documentation 
> thoroughly for the plugins you are using.
> 
> !!! Some configuration options have changed since 0.6, so 
> make sure you update your CCNet Config file before restarting.
> --
> 
> Please email the CruiseControl.NET User Mailing list
> (http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=71179) with any feedback.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike
> 
> --
> mike roberts | http://mikeroberts.thoughtworks.net/ | 
> http://www.thoughtworks.com/
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
> LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Ccnet-devel mailing list
> Ccn...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-devel
> 
>