[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2005073663A1 - Systeme de protection d'objet et procede de protection d'objets - Google Patents

Systeme de protection d'objet et procede de protection d'objets Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005073663A1
WO2005073663A1 PCT/EP2005/000988 EP2005000988W WO2005073663A1 WO 2005073663 A1 WO2005073663 A1 WO 2005073663A1 EP 2005000988 W EP2005000988 W EP 2005000988W WO 2005073663 A1 WO2005073663 A1 WO 2005073663A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
fog
protected
cover
protection
height
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/EP2005/000988
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Stefan Lauer
Andreas Blache
Steffen Speer
Rudolf Salzeder
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Buck Neue Technologien GmbH
Original Assignee
Buck Neue Technologien GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Buck Neue Technologien GmbH filed Critical Buck Neue Technologien GmbH
Priority to PL05701294T priority Critical patent/PL1711774T3/pl
Priority to AT05701294T priority patent/ATE463713T1/de
Priority to DE502005009358T priority patent/DE502005009358D1/de
Priority to EP05701294A priority patent/EP1711774B1/fr
Priority to JP2007552439A priority patent/JP4977036B2/ja
Publication of WO2005073663A1 publication Critical patent/WO2005073663A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H9/00—Equipment for attack or defence by spreading flame, gas or smoke or leurres; Chemical warfare equipment
    • F41H9/06—Apparatus for generating artificial fog or smoke screens

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an object protection system which envelopes an object to be protected by means of nebulization and therefore blocks the view of this object.
  • the invention further relates to a corresponding method for protecting objects.
  • a fogging is used in the military field to fog an area by means of fog grenades, fog mortars or even distributed mist pots or fog generators.
  • Military applications concern both the privacy of people and the privacy of vehicles.
  • the nebulized bodies disassemble at the point of action and distribute the nebulizing mass which is ignited at the same time, whereby partially so-called pellets are used as nebulising masses which are distributed and ignited at the site of action and then generate the nebula from the ground.
  • this type of fog protection is only suitable for the fogging of objects with very low height, such as a person or a vehicle, and remains largely at ground level.
  • an object of the present invention to provide an object protection system and a corresponding method which also larger objects, such as buildings, industrial plants or also nuclear power plants, in particular against terrorist attacks, for example, using an aircraft that is targeted to such an object to crash, or by using a remote-controlled aircraft effectively protected by Vemebelung.
  • claims 2 to 11 relate to particularly advantageous embodiments of the object protection system according to the invention, which relate to claims 13 to 20 particularly advantageous embodiments of the method according to the invention for protecting objects.
  • an object protection system comprises a plurality of launcher devices with active masses.
  • the launcher for the smoke grenades are in the vicinity of an object to be protected, such as a building, an industrial plant or a nuclear power plant, arranged, the launcher are designed so that the effective masses are implemented in height, ie, ignited the mist effective mass in height becomes.
  • the firing devices are preferably designed so that the fog grenades can be fired at substantially the same time, in particular in salvoes. By firing the effective masses in height, each fog grenade generates a defined, limited fog area during the implementation.
  • the launcher and the fog grenade are designed so that the plurality of mist areas generated in combination form a substantially tubular protective cover which surrounds the object to be protected in lateral directions substantially completely and has a minimum height which is at least the height of the protected Object corresponds.
  • an object to be protected can be protected quickly and effectively, since a possibly approaching aircraft obstructs the view of the object from the outside, which prevents, for example, a targeted approach and a targeted crash on the object to be protected.
  • the launcher and the fog grenade according to the invention are designed so that the plurality of mist areas generated in combination at least one Sector of such a tubular protective smoke cover (20), said at least one sector surrounding the object to be protected in lateral directions over an angular range of at least 90 °, more preferably over an angular range of at least 180 °, wherein the height of the sector a minimum Height equal to at least the height of the object to be protected.
  • the angular range of the sector is determined by the smallest possible circle is placed around the outline of the object to be protected, which completely surrounds the object to be protected, the angular range at this the object surrounding circle is determined.
  • mist contains particles (particles or droplets), which particles at least partially have a diameter which is in the size range of the wavelength of the electromagnetic radiation in the visible range, so that electromagnetic radiation passing through the py - Mikel and Rayleigh scattering is significantly reduced. Furthermore, it also comes to the absorption of electromagnetic radiation.
  • the transmission should fall below 2% in order to permanently prevent object recognition in all cases.
  • ⁇ is the transmission and x is the optical path length through the irradiated medium
  • ⁇ is the so-called mass extinction coefficient. It is a material immanent size and depends on the wavelength. The mass extinction coefficient thus indicates the ability of the transmission damping for the respective smoke material system.
  • the individual fog areas are generated in the object protection system according to the invention in the form of a mosaic side by side and one above the other, that a substantially tubular smoke protection cover is formed, inside which the object to be protected is located.
  • the generated mist areas are generated in the fog protection sheath substantially directly adjacent to each other, but it is also possible to form the object protection system and in particular the launcher and the fog grenades or to select the effective masses so that the generated mist areas, the size of which is calculated as described above, overlap in order to produce as dense as possible tubular protective cover with sufficiently low transmission in all areas, for example a transmission ⁇ below 4% or below 2%.
  • mist effect mass preferably very light elements are used, such as platelets, thin tablets, coated carriers or pellets, coarse granules or dragees, which are able to produce over several seconds, preferably between 3 to 15 seconds, fog, said very light elements preferably have a low rate of descent, so that the burning and fog-generating pieces do not fall through to the ground and there cause a fire hazard.
  • Preferred sinking speeds are in a range of about 2 m / s to 10 m / s, in particular 4 m / s to 6 m / s.
  • irritation effects are additionally realized by the selection of the fog substance as well as the firing sequence which is staggered in time within a certain scope.
  • the effects are produced by decomposition flashes and by the visible burn-off (flame effect) of the active mass.
  • the human visual system has incorporated biological compensation and control mechanisms via sensory cells, optic line, visual center in the brain, switching stations, efferent neural pathways, and eye muscles that counterbalance the structural weaknesses. Some of these mechanisms can be influenced by the optional emissive effects.
  • the retina represents the photosensitive detector and has a complicated structure.
  • the brightness control of this detector is done by aperture control of the pupil and sensitivity change of the sensory cells by photochemical processes.
  • the retina is able to interconnect multiple sensory cells and couple to a nerve fiber. All these effects are affected by the optional emission effects.
  • a further influence occurs via processes in the visual center of the brain: At the edge of the field of vision, movements or abrupt changes in brightness are perceived better than in the center in order to be able to better recognize approaching threats. Automatically and unconsciously, the area of optimal vision is directed to the edge threat. This mechanism is also evoked by the emissive effects.
  • firing devices for the fog grenades different devices, such as stationary launcher batteries, can be used.
  • the launcher batteries are fanned out in a preferred embodiment to cover different positions in both height and width.
  • the individual launcher tubes aim in different directions, so that the fog grenades are fired in different directions such that their decomposition and effect takes place at the planned action site, namely at the planned location of the fog protective sheath to be produced.
  • the type of installation and alignment can be used to produce a wide variety of forms of smoke protection envelopes, for example cylinders, cones, cuboids, ellipsoids, etc. Both symmetrical and asymmetrical shapes can be formed, depending on the object shape and structure to be protected.
  • the firing energies of the fog grenades can be used as setting and control variables. It is possible to have different fertilize to achieve different distances and to use different delay times between firing and actuation of Zerlegerladung means delay element. It should be noted that with the degrees of freedom launcher, shot energy (and thus launch speed) and delay time any location in the room can be achieved, so that the desired shape of the fog protection shell can be generated by a mosaic composition of individual fog areas of the individual fog grenades.
  • Projector assemblies can be positioned differently depending on the infrastructure and needs, for example on buildings or roofs, but also on the ground.
  • the site is chosen so that the required firing energy and the firing shock remains in reasonable magnitudes, being avoided that any duds can pose a source of danger.
  • the object protection system is also designed so that the weft direction is not aimed towards buildings, used roads or roads, including escape routes, or to valuable facilities and buildings.
  • certain security zones are defined, in the directions of which no fog grenades are fired.
  • the launcher or the dispenser units are designed so that an exchange and testing of ammunition is possible.
  • protection against unauthorized access is preferably provided.
  • Devices are preferably provided for protection against splinters in the form of, for example, 2.3 m high protective walls, which can be designed to be open at the top. It is to be considered in the design of the dispenser units that the disassembly of an ammunition No danger to personnel outside the dispenser unit due to splinters in the dispenser.
  • the nebula can have different shapes, in particular a cross-section of the nebula in the horizontal direction may have different shapes, for example the horizontal cross section may be substantially circular or oval, but it is also possible for the horizontal cross section to be substantially rectangular or polygonal shape, or any other shape as desired.
  • the cross-sectional shape can be adapted to the shape and structure of the object to be protected, but also deliberately deviate from this, so as not to allow conclusions about the shape of the protective cover on the object to be protected.
  • the horizontal cross-section of the nebula can have substantially the same shapes at different heights, but it is also possible that the horizontal cross-section also has different shapes at different heights, for example a substantially rectangular shape in a lower region which slowly increases in height Area merges into an oval cross-sectional shape.
  • the horizontal cross-section at different heights includes a substantially equal area, in a particularly preferred Ausumngsform is provided, however, that the smoke protection sheath tapers in a vertical upward direction.
  • the smoke protection sheath tapers in a height range which is above the height of the object to be protected.
  • the substantially tubular smoke shield is open at the top, although possibly tapered, but in another embodiment it is also possible for the tubular smoke shield to be additionally provided with a lid so that the smoke shield will also protect the object to be protected completely shielded.
  • a completely closed hose-shaped protective mist cover can also be realized, for example, by the fact that the smoke protection cover tapers upwards in the vertical direction in such a way that the walls of the fog protection cover essentially converge and thereby close off the protective cover.
  • the smoke protection cover can be designed such that the object to be protected forms substantially centrally within the smoke protection cover
  • the decentralized arrangement of the object to be protected in the protective mist cover has the advantage that, in particular in the cases in which a not very large volume is detected by the fog protection, a potential attacker can not assume that the object to be protected in the Center of the space formed by the protective cover, so that a Zielfin- formation is further difficult.
  • the smoke cover may be generated substantially in the immediate vicinity of the object, but in a preferred embodiment it is provided that the fog wrap is generated at a designated distance from the object so as to provide clearance between the fog wrap and the object to be protected.
  • this clearance has the advantage that the volume enclosed by the protective cover is increased, thus making it even more difficult to locate the object to be protected, and thus reducing the probability of a hit.
  • the provision of a free space in addition to the above-mentioned advantages furthermore has the advantage that in the case of wind influences that offset the generated smoke protection cover, the object to be protected remains over a longer period of time within the generated smoke protection cover.
  • the size of the free space is selected as a function of a required total protection time for the object and as a function of a predetermined wind speed.
  • wind speed in preferred embodiments, statistical values are used for the location at which the object to be protected is located, wherein as wind speed, for example, an average wind speed or even a maximum wind speed can be assumed.
  • the wind speed is taken to be a value chosen so that, for example, in 80% or 90% of all cases, the wind does not exceed the assumed wind force.
  • the preferred wind direction can be taken into account, wherein in a preferred embodiment, the free space in the direction , from which the wind comes preferred, is chosen to be larger than on the leeward side of the object to be protected.
  • the free space can be selected in a preferred Ausumngsform so that at the predetermined wind speeds and the required total protection time a one-time generation of the smoke protection cover is sufficient. For example, with a required protection time of 180 seconds and a maximum wind speed of 10 m / s, a free space of approximately 1800 m would have to be provided.
  • the object protection system such that at certain time intervals, at least twice, a smoke protection cover is generated.
  • the height of the fog protection cover corresponds to at least the maximum height of the object to be protected, but preferably the fog protection cover is higher than the object to be protected, for example, to ensure that even with an approach of an aircraft from a greater height, the object remains hidden longer, which in particular then Meaning is, if the fog protection cover is not closed at the top.
  • this additional beyond the height of the building height of the fog protective sheath depends on the one of the free space, ie the distance of the fog protection sheath to the side boundaries of the object to be protected, as well as a maximum assumed approach angle of an aircraft or a flying object, so that it is preferably ensured that the free space and total height of the smoke protection cover are coordinated so that the object to be protected, for example, from an aircraft can only be seen through the upper edge of the fog protection cover through an upper opening when the then required approach angle of the aircraft the object is too high to control the aircraft or the flying object still on the object to be protected.
  • the hose-shaped protective mist cover is designed so that a free space .DELTA.r of the following formula
  • t tot is the desired total protection duration and v w is the assumed wind speed.
  • the total height H of the smoke protection sheath is furthermore selected as a function of the object height h o b j and as a function of the free space ⁇ r and a maximum assumed approach angle ⁇ to the horizontal of an aircraft or a flying object, so that the overall height H preferably satisfies the following formula:
  • approach angle ß preferably a value of 20 ° to the horizontal is assumed, in another embodiment, an angle ß of 10 ° or 5 ° to the horizontal is assumed.
  • safety surcharges may be taken into account, for example the above values for ⁇ r and H may be increased by 50% or even by 100% to increase the safety factor or not waited for external influences, such as a higher wind speed or a wind from an unexpected direction, to compensate.
  • increasing the clearance ⁇ r also increases the overall protection period or, in the case of multiple generation of fog shrouds, the post-nourishment time t n , so that a fog shroud must be generated less frequently, which again reduces the fog usage amount.
  • free spaces ⁇ r are preferably provided that are greater than 150 m, preferably greater than 200 m, particularly preferably greater than 250 m or even 300 m.
  • the object protection system and the launcher and the fog grenades are designed so that at a total required protection time three to four times the fog protection must be generated, that is nachgenährt two to three times.
  • sufficient smoke grenades must be present in the launcher, so that in a relatively short time without manual reloading several grenades can be fired.
  • the entire system may preferably be designed so that several attacks can be fought off, preferably at least two to three attacks.
  • the object protection system and the firing devices are preferably designed so that a Nachnähren the smoke protection cover after a first generation of the fog protection cover at fixed intervals, which, as explained above, are dependent on the assumed wind speed v w and the free space ⁇ r.
  • a controller is provided, which can be provided in particular as part of the launcher or the dispenser units.
  • a control preferably has the following tasks:
  • protection against voltage failure / voltage recovery is preferably integrated.
  • the object protection system is further provided with a wind measuring device which measures the actual prevailing wind during and after the first generation of a nebulizing cover, so that the post-nourishment time is automatically selected in dependence on the measurements of the wind measuring devices.
  • the time intervals between the Nachnähren are thus not dependent on the assumed statistical data, but on the real wind speed and optionally - direction.
  • Another Ausumngsform with knowledge of the approach direction by sensors or computer science concerns the sectoral release of the smoke screen. This is particularly beneficial in military applications where more common threats are expected compared to civil applications.
  • the invention also relates to a method for protecting objects in which in the vicinity of an object to be protected by means of a plurality of fog grenades, the effective mass are implemented in height, so that each fog grenade generates a specified fog area, a fog protection shell is generated, wherein the plurality of fog grenades and the plurality of generated mist areas in combination form a substantially tubular protective smoke cover substantially completely surrounding the object to be protected in lateral directions and having a minimum height corresponding at least to the height of the object to be protected.
  • FIG. 1 shows an object to be protected with and without fog protection cover in a perspective view obliquely from above and in a plan view;
  • Figure 2 is a partial section of a fog protective cover according to the invention.
  • FIG. 3 schematically shows a partial cross section of a smoke protection cover around an object to be protected
  • FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view schematically showing an object to be protected and a cross-sectional shape of the misting shield shell
  • Fig. 5 is a diagram showing a possible relative arrangement of decomposition circuits according to the invention.
  • Fig. 1 shows schematically an object to be protected 10, in this case a nuclear power plant, wherein the object 10 to be protected is shown in the upper part of Fig. 1 from a substantially lateral view and in a plan view.
  • the object to be protected 10 is shown, which is surrounded by an object protection system according to the invention with a protective cover 20, wherein the protective cover 20 is shown in Fig. 1 only very schematically, especially the mist areas generated by the fog grenades only circle are shown - or spherical, wherein the circles or balls represent the respective disassembly circle of a fog grenade.
  • the object shielded by the protective mist cover is shown schematically as it would be seen, for example, from the perspective of an approaching aircraft.
  • the smoke cover is higher than the maximum height of the building 10, only by the oblique angle, the highest elevation of the building 10 through the opening of the smoke cover 20 can be seen.
  • Fig. 1 In the lower right part of Fig. 1 is a schematic plan view of the protected by the protective cover 20 object 10 can be seen, from which it can be seen in particular that the Ausumngsform Ausumngsform the anti-fog sheath 20 has a substantially circular cross section in the horizontal direction, wherein this Cross section tapered with increasing height.
  • Fig. 2 is a partial section of a fog protection sheath is shown schematically, as it is produced with the object protection system according to the invention or according to the inventive method.
  • the smoke cover 20 is produced by the interaction of a plurality of fog grenades, which are vertically displaced at their superior positions, so that in the manner of a mosaic, a substantially closed mist cover (20, see FIG. Fig. 1) is generated.
  • a decomposition cycle 22 is produced, which has a decomposition diameter d 1. Due to the decrease of the reacted fogging compound, in which preferably very light elements are used, depending on the rate of descent and the duration of mist generation, ie the duration of the burning time of the fogging compound, a mist carpet 24 is produced, so that a total of one mist area 26 is formed with an extension in the horizontal direction of d n ⁇ and a height in the vertical direction of h n ⁇ per fog grenade. The plurality of mist areas 26 combine to create the mist shield (20). It should be noted at this point that the Fig.
  • the decomposition circuits 22 and the misting rugs 24 and the mist areas 26 only schematically represents. Also, in Fig. 2, the decomposition circuits are positioned so that they are arranged at a slight distance from each other, but it is also possible that the object protection system of the invention and the launcher and the fog grenades are designed so that the mist circles 22 at least in the horizontal direction directly to each other border or preferably even slightly overlap.
  • FIG. 3 shows schematically an object 10 to be protected with a height h obj , which is surrounded by a protective cover 20 according to the invention with an object protection system.
  • the smoke cover 20 is spaced from the object with a clearance ⁇ r and has a total height H corresponding to the height of the object h obj plus an additional height ⁇ h.
  • the additional height ⁇ h is chosen as a function of a maximum possible approach angle ß to the horizontal of a flying object 40 and the selected free space ⁇ r so that at the moment in the plane from the object to be protected 10 on the upper limit of the fog protection shell 20 is visible, the maximum approach angle ß has already been exceeded, so that the aircraft, as soon as the object is visible, can no longer be controlled on the object 10.
  • the overall height H therefore satisfies the following formula in the embodiment shown here:
  • a safety factor is preferably included, so that the total height H satisfies, for example, the following formula:
  • Fig. 4 shows schematically and in cross-sectional view a substantially elliptical anti-fog sheath 20, which according to the invention has been produced around a rectangular object 10 to be protected.
  • the ratios of the two semiaxes of the ellipse a, b have the same ratio to one another as the lengths of the side dimensions of the object x 0 , y 0 , wherein the elliptical cross section of the antifogging 20 satisfies the following formula: x 2 / a 2 + y 2 / b 2 ⁇
  • the anti-misting sheath 20 maintains this elliptical cross-section over the entire height, but it is also possible that the shape of the anti-misting sheath changes vertically upward. It is also possible that the smoke protection sheath tapers upwards in the vertical direction.
  • Fig. 5 shows schematically a relative Positioniemng two Zertownsnike 22 of fog grenades having a Zertechnische handmesser d n ⁇ of 40 m.
  • the decomposition circuits have been positioned so that they overlap over a partial area of approximately 10 m, so that the centers of the decomposition circuits are approximately 30 m apart.
  • FIG. 5 also shows an example of the values for the transmission produced by the decomposition circuits, wherein it should be taken into account that the concentration c in the overlap has twice the value as in the remainder of the haze module.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
  • Respiratory Apparatuses And Protective Means (AREA)
  • Air Conditioning Control Device (AREA)
  • Laying Of Electric Cables Or Lines Outside (AREA)
  • Tents Or Canopies (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Container Filling Or Packaging Operations (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un système de protection d'objet comprenant une pluralité de dispositifs de lancement destinés à des grenades fumigènes ayant des masses actives. Le système de protection d'objet constitué d'une pluralité de zones de brouillard produites par différentes grenades fumigènes créée une enveloppe protectrice de brouillard (20) sensiblement en forme de boyau. L'invention concerne également un procédé permettant de former une enveloppe protectrice de brouillard (20) pour un objet à protéger (10).
PCT/EP2005/000988 2004-02-02 2005-02-01 Systeme de protection d'objet et procede de protection d'objets Ceased WO2005073663A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL05701294T PL1711774T3 (pl) 2004-02-02 2005-02-01 Układ do ochrony obiektów i sposób ochrony obiektów
AT05701294T ATE463713T1 (de) 2004-02-02 2005-02-01 Objektschutzsystem und verfahren zum schützen von objekten
DE502005009358T DE502005009358D1 (de) 2004-02-02 2005-02-01 Objektschutzsystem und verfahren zum schützen von objekten
EP05701294A EP1711774B1 (fr) 2004-02-02 2005-02-01 Systeme de protection d'objet et procede de protection d'objets
JP2007552439A JP4977036B2 (ja) 2004-02-02 2005-02-01 対象物を保護するための対象物保護システムおよび方法

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102004005105.4 2004-02-02
DE102004005105A DE102004005105A1 (de) 2004-02-02 2004-02-02 Objektschutzsystem und Verfahren zum Schützen von Objekten

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005073663A1 true WO2005073663A1 (fr) 2005-08-11

Family

ID=34813088

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2005/000988 Ceased WO2005073663A1 (fr) 2004-02-02 2005-02-01 Systeme de protection d'objet et procede de protection d'objets

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1711774B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP4977036B2 (fr)
AT (1) ATE463713T1 (fr)
DE (2) DE102004005105A1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2342179T3 (fr)
PL (1) PL1711774T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2005073663A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020120041A1 (fr) * 2018-12-10 2020-06-18 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Procédé de protection d'objets mobiles ou immobiles contre des menaces guidées par laser qui s'approchent

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102007013676A1 (de) 2007-03-19 2008-09-25 Oerlikon Contraves Ag Schutzvorrichtung für ein Lager oder dergleichen mit wenigstens einem zu schützenden Objekt und/oder Personen
EP2612101B1 (fr) 2010-08-31 2017-01-11 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH Dispositif et procédé pour générer un mur ou un nuage de brouillard actif
DE102010036026A1 (de) 2010-08-31 2012-03-01 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Effektivität einer Nebelwand zur Erzeugung einer wirksamen Nebelwolke

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3022460A1 (de) 1980-06-14 1981-12-24 Precitronic Gesellschaft für Feinmechanik und Electronic mbH, 2000 Hamburg Verfahren und vorrichtung zum ausbringen von in luft schwebenden tarnmitteln mittels traegerprojektilen
US4704966A (en) * 1986-05-16 1987-11-10 Aai Corporation Method of forming IR smoke screen
EP0293273A1 (fr) * 1987-03-12 1988-11-30 GIAT Industries Projectile fumigène et munition ainsi équipée
DE3830142A1 (de) 1988-09-05 1990-03-15 Joergen Brosow Vorrichtung zur automatischen steuerung der einbringung eines fremdstoffs in die atmosphaere

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2747926A1 (de) * 1977-10-26 1979-05-10 Hoechst Ag Scharniergelenk
DE3310616A1 (de) * 1983-03-24 1984-09-27 Precitronic Gesellschaft für Feinmechanik und Electronic mbH, 2000 Hamburg Verfahren zum tarnen eines seefahrzeugs gegen ortung aufgrund elektromagnetischer strahlung sowie taeuscheinrichtung zur durchfuehrung dieser tarnung
DE3311530C2 (de) * 1983-03-30 1987-05-07 Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-Gmbh, 6000 Frankfurt Unterwasserfahrzeug
DE3421734A1 (de) * 1984-06-12 1985-12-12 Buck Chemisch-Technische Werke GmbH & Co, 7347 Bad Überkingen Verfahren zum schutz von infrarot-strahlenden zielen, insbesondere von schiffen, vor mit infrarot-lenksuchkoepfen ausgeruesteten flugkoerpern
DE3612183A1 (de) * 1986-04-11 1987-10-22 Wegmann & Co Verfahren zur ablenkung von durch radar- und/oder infrarotstrahlung gelenkten flugkoerpern, insbesondere zum schutz von seeschiffen und schiffsverbaenden sowie einrichtung zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens
DE4115384C2 (de) * 1991-05-10 1994-07-07 Buck Chem Tech Werke Verfahren zum Schützen von eine IR-Strahlung abgebenden Objekten
DE4238038C1 (de) * 1992-11-11 1994-06-16 Buck Chem Tech Werke Verfahren zum Bereitstellen eines Scheinzielkörpers
DE19704070C2 (de) * 1997-02-04 1998-12-24 Buck Chem Tech Werke Tarn- und/oder Täuscheinrichtung

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3022460A1 (de) 1980-06-14 1981-12-24 Precitronic Gesellschaft für Feinmechanik und Electronic mbH, 2000 Hamburg Verfahren und vorrichtung zum ausbringen von in luft schwebenden tarnmitteln mittels traegerprojektilen
US4704966A (en) * 1986-05-16 1987-11-10 Aai Corporation Method of forming IR smoke screen
EP0293273A1 (fr) * 1987-03-12 1988-11-30 GIAT Industries Projectile fumigène et munition ainsi équipée
DE3830142A1 (de) 1988-09-05 1990-03-15 Joergen Brosow Vorrichtung zur automatischen steuerung der einbringung eines fremdstoffs in die atmosphaere

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020120041A1 (fr) * 2018-12-10 2020-06-18 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Procédé de protection d'objets mobiles ou immobiles contre des menaces guidées par laser qui s'approchent

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE463713T1 (de) 2010-04-15
JP4977036B2 (ja) 2012-07-18
EP1711774A1 (fr) 2006-10-18
DE102004005105A1 (de) 2005-09-01
ES2342179T3 (es) 2010-07-02
DE502005009358D1 (de) 2010-05-20
EP1711774B1 (fr) 2010-04-07
PL1711774T3 (pl) 2010-09-30
JP2008505306A (ja) 2008-02-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0597233B1 (fr) Méthode de production d'un objet de leurre
DE3024247C2 (fr)
DE4115384C2 (de) Verfahren zum Schützen von eine IR-Strahlung abgebenden Objekten
DE102009043196A1 (de) Abwehrsystem
DE3400585A1 (de) Wachthaus
EP1711774B1 (fr) Systeme de protection d'objet et procede de protection d'objets
EP0588015B1 (fr) Méthode et matériaux de camouflage et son application
DE19704070C2 (de) Tarn- und/oder Täuscheinrichtung
DE3022460C2 (fr)
DE202004001531U1 (de) Objektschutzsystem zum Schützen von Objekten
DE4400545B4 (de) Rauchladungs-Behälter, vorzugsweise zur Anordnung in einer Rauchladungs-Artilleriegranate
DE2459633A1 (de) Einrichtung zum schutz gegen geschosse
DE3900442A1 (de) Bomblet
EP3019813B1 (fr) Blindage de protection contre le laser
EP3622242A1 (fr) Système de défense contre des corps volants légers, tels que des drones
DE102012106746B4 (de) Schutzausstattung, Fahrzeug sowie Verfahren zum Schutz eines Objekts
DE3636945B3 (de) Aktive bzw. reaktive Panzerung
DE3311075C2 (fr)
EP3019816B1 (fr) Blindage de protection contre le laser
EP3019817B1 (fr) Blindage laser
EP1746381A1 (fr) Dispositif et méthode de protection contre des missiles et ustilisation d'un dispositif laser

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2005701294

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2007552439

Country of ref document: JP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2005701294

Country of ref document: EP