WO2004099874A1 - パターン決定方法及びシステム、マスクの製造方法、結像性能調整方法、露光方法及び装置、並びにプログラム及び情報記録媒体 - Google Patents
パターン決定方法及びシステム、マスクの製造方法、結像性能調整方法、露光方法及び装置、並びにプログラム及び情報記録媒体 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2004099874A1 WO2004099874A1 PCT/JP2004/005481 JP2004005481W WO2004099874A1 WO 2004099874 A1 WO2004099874 A1 WO 2004099874A1 JP 2004005481 W JP2004005481 W JP 2004005481W WO 2004099874 A1 WO2004099874 A1 WO 2004099874A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- pattern
- imaging performance
- information
- projection optical
- optical system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/70216—Mask projection systems
- G03F7/70258—Projection system adjustments, e.g. adjustments during exposure or alignment during assembly of projection system
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/70483—Information management; Active and passive control; Testing; Wafer monitoring, e.g. pattern monitoring
- G03F7/70491—Information management, e.g. software; Active and passive control, e.g. details of controlling exposure processes or exposure tool monitoring processes
- G03F7/70533—Controlling abnormal operating mode, e.g. taking account of waiting time, decision to rework or rework flow
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/70483—Information management; Active and passive control; Testing; Wafer monitoring, e.g. pattern monitoring
- G03F7/70591—Testing optical components
- G03F7/706—Aberration measurement
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/70483—Information management; Active and passive control; Testing; Wafer monitoring, e.g. pattern monitoring
- G03F7/70605—Workpiece metrology
- G03F7/70616—Monitoring the printed patterns
- G03F7/70641—Focus
Definitions
- Pattern determination method and system mask manufacturing method, imaging performance adjustment method, exposure method and apparatus, program and information recording medium
- the present invention relates to a pattern determining method and system, a mask manufacturing method, an imaging performance adjusting method, an exposure method and an apparatus, and a program and an information recording medium. More specifically, the present invention determines information of a pattern to be formed on a mask. Pattern determining method and pattern determining system, mask manufacturing method using the pattern determining method, image forming performance adjusting method of projection optical system for projecting a pattern formed on the mask onto an object, and image forming performance adjusting The present invention relates to an exposure method using the method, an exposure apparatus suitable for implementing the exposure method, a program for causing a computer to execute a predetermined process for designing a mask, and an information recording medium on which the program is recorded. Background art
- a pattern of a photomask or a reticle (hereinafter, collectively referred to as an “r reticle”) is formed on a surface through a projection optical system.
- a projection exposure apparatus that transfers onto a wafer or a glass plate or other object (hereinafter, collectively referred to as a “wafer”) coated with a photosensitive agent such as a photoresist, for example, a step-and-repeat reduction projection exposure apparatus (so-called Step-and-scan type scanning projection exposure apparatus (so-called “scanning” stepper), etc. are used.
- the imaging performance of the projection optical system is in a desired state (for example, to correct a magnification error of a transfer image of a reticle pattern with respect to a shot area (pattern) on a wafer). It is indispensable that it be adjusted.
- the imaging performance of the projection optical system It is desirable to adjust.
- an image forming performance adjustment mechanism for adjusting the position and inclination of an optical element such as a lens element constituting the projection optical system is used.
- the imaging performance varies depending on the exposure conditions, for example, the illumination conditions (illumination ⁇ , etc.), the N. ⁇ (numerical aperture) of the projection optical system, the pattern used, and the like. Therefore, the adjustment position of each optical element by the optimum imaging performance adjustment mechanism under certain exposure conditions may not be the optimum adjustment position under other exposure conditions.
- lighting conditions such as lighting
- projection optical systems have recently been considered.
- ⁇ - Optimizes the imaging characteristics (imaging performance) or the imaging state of the pattern by the projection optical system according to the exposure conditions determined according to the (numerical aperture), the pattern to be used, etc.
- An invention relating to a method of adjusting an adjustment mechanism or an image forming characteristic adjustment method and a program thereof has been proposed (for example, International Patent Publication No. WO 2005/03666 and the corresponding US Patent Application Publication No. 0 0 5 9 4 4 4).
- the plurality of exposure apparatuses individually use the invention described in the patent publication. Since the pattern of the reticle used in each exposure apparatus is corrected (optimized), a reticle optimized for one exposure apparatus may not be able to be used in another exposure apparatus. That is, it may be difficult to share a reticle with a plurality of exposure apparatuses. This is because the aberration state of the projection optical system of the exposure device differs for each exposure device (unit), and the positional difference and line width difference of the pattern of the pattern occur due to the difference (difference) in aberration between the units. In fact, it is difficult to share such reticles.
- the imaging characteristics (imaging performance) of the projection optical systems of a plurality of exposure apparatuses are optimized for a certain pattern.
- the tolerance of the required imaging performance error is relatively large, the same pattern can be used as long as it is within the adjustable range of the adjustment mechanism provided in each exposure apparatus.
- the imaging performance of the projection optical system can be optimized.
- the imaging characteristic (imaging performance or aberration) of the projection optical system of the exposure apparatus is optimized.
- the adjustment of the adjustment mechanism of the camera tends to reach its limit, especially when the same reticle is shared by many units or units with different performance, making it difficult to adjust the imaging performance with any of the exposure equipment Is more likely to occur. In particular, when the tolerance of the required error of the imaging performance is reduced, the above-mentioned situation is more likely to occur.
- a first object of the present invention is to provide a pattern determination method and a pattern determination method which facilitate the manufacture (production) of a mask that can be commonly used by a plurality of exposure apparatuses. It is to provide a pattern determination system.
- a second object of the present invention is to provide a mask manufacturing method capable of easily manufacturing a mask that can be commonly used by a plurality of exposure apparatuses.
- a third object of the present invention is to provide an imaging performance adjustment method capable of substantially improving the ability of the projection optical system to adjust the imaging performance for a pattern on a mask.
- a fourth object of the present invention is to provide an exposure method and an exposure apparatus capable of accurately transferring a pattern on a mask onto an object.
- a fifth object of the present invention is to provide a program and an information recording medium which enable a mask used in a plurality of exposure apparatuses to be easily designed using a computer. Disclosure of the invention
- a pattern to be formed on a mask is used in a plurality of exposure apparatuses that form a projection image of a pattern formed on a mask on an object via a projection optical system.
- a pattern determination method for determining information comprising: adjustment information of an adjustment device that adjusts a state of formation of a projected image of the pattern on an object under predetermined exposure conditions including information of the pattern, and the projection optics corresponding thereto. Based on a plurality of types of information including information on the imaging performance of the system, correction information on the pattern, and information on an allowable range of the imaging performance, under target exposure conditions in which the correction information on the pattern is considered.
- a predetermined imaging performance of the projection optical system of at least one of the exposure devices is outside the allowable range.
- a second step of setting the correction information according to a predetermined criterion based on the imaging performance outside the allowable range An optimization processing step that is repeated until it is determined that the image performance is within the allowable range; and setting in the optimization processing step when the imaging performance of the projection optical systems of all the exposure apparatuses is within the allowable range.
- the pattern correction information may include a case where the correction value is zero.
- the “exposure conditions” include illumination conditions (illumination ⁇ (coherence factor), orbicular zone ratio, distribution of light quantity on a pupil plane of the illumination optical system, etc.), and numerical aperture ( ⁇ %) Of the projection optical system.
- Target pattern type punched pattern or leftover pattern, dense pattern or isolated pattern, pitch and line width and duty ratio for line and space pattern, line width for isolated line pattern, and line width for contact hole
- the appropriate adjustment amount means an adjustment amount of the adjustment device that becomes almost the best within a range where the imaging performance of the projection optical system when projecting the pattern to be projected is adjustable.
- Adjustment information of an adjustment device that adjusts the state of formation of a projected image of the pattern on an object under predetermined exposure conditions including pattern information (this may be information of a known pattern, for example, may be a design value). And information on the imaging performance of the projection optical system (projection optical system of the exposure apparatus to be optimized) corresponding thereto, Based on a plurality of types of information including the pattern correction information and the information on the allowable range of the imaging performance, based on the target exposure condition (the pattern is corrected by the correction information) in consideration of the correction information of the pattern.
- the adjustment device As a result of the adjustment of the adjustment device (the adjustment device of each exposure device), it is determined whether the predetermined imaging performance of the projection optical system of at least one of the exposure devices is out of the allowable range under the above target exposure condition. If there is an imaging performance that is out of an allowable range as a result of the determination, a second step of setting the correction information according to a predetermined criterion based on the imaging performance, Format in the process This process is repeated until it is determined that the image forming performance of the projection optical systems of all the exposure apparatuses is within the allowable range.
- the correction information set in the above optimization processing step is determined as the correction information of the pattern (determination step) ).
- the correction information of the pattern determined by the first pattern determination method of the present invention or the information of the pattern obtained by correcting the original pattern using the correction information at the time of manufacturing the mask, a plurality of It is possible to easily realize the manufacturing (manufacturing) of a mask that can be commonly used in the above exposure apparatuses.
- the predetermined imaging performance of the projection optical system of at least one exposure device is out of the allowable range.
- the method may further include a second determining step of determining whether or not a predetermined imaging performance of the projection optical system of at least one exposure apparatus is out of the allowable range.
- the set correction information and other information (the appropriate adjustment amount of each exposure apparatus calculated in the first step, the predetermined exposure Prior to the setting of the correction information, based on the adjustment information of the adjustment device under the condition, the information on the imaging performance of the projection optical system corresponding thereto, and the information on the allowable range of the imaging performance.
- the adjustment of the adjustment device according to the appropriate adjustment amount calculated in the process at least one unit under the target exposure condition (under the target exposure condition in which the pattern is replaced with a corrected pattern corrected by the correction information). It is determined whether the predetermined imaging performance of the projection optical system of the exposure apparatus is out of the allowable range.
- the process proceeds to the determination step without returning to the first step.
- the correction information set at this time is determined as the correction information of the pattern. Therefore, after returning to the first step and calculating the appropriate adjustment amount again, it is necessary to confirm that the imaging performance of the projection optical system of all the exposure apparatuses is within the allowable range and determine the correction information of the pattern. In comparison, it is possible to determine the correction information of the short-time pattern.
- a predetermined pattern for determining correction information may be a criterion based on the imaging performance outside the allowable range and a criterion for correcting a pattern such that the imaging performance falls within the allowable range. Therefore, for example, 1Z2 of the imaging performance outside the allowable range can be used as the correction information (correction value).
- the correction information may be set based on an average value of residual errors in predetermined imaging performance of the plurality of exposure apparatuses.
- the information on the imaging performance may be information that is a basis for calculating an optimal adjustment amount of the adjustment device under target exposure conditions together with the adjustment information of the adjustment device.
- the information on the imaging performance may include information on the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system after the adjustment under the predetermined exposure condition, or the information on the imaging performance may be the projection. Information on the wavefront aberration of the optical system alone and the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the predetermined exposure condition may be included.
- the wavefront aberration (single wavefront aberration) of the projection optical system alone for example, before the projection optical system is incorporated into the exposure apparatus
- the on-body after adjustment under the reference exposure conditions (on body) That is, assuming that the deviation of the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system after the projection optical system is incorporated in the exposure device corresponds to the deviation of the adjustment amount of the adjustment device, the ideal state of the imaging performance is calculated.
- the correction amount of the adjustment amount is obtained based on the deviation from the deviation, and the correction amount of the wavefront aberration can be obtained based on the correction amount.
- the projection optical system after the adjustment under the exposure condition as the reference is adjusted.
- the wavefront aberration of the system can be determined.
- the information on the imaging performance is information on a difference between the imaging performance of the projection optical system and a predetermined target value of the imaging performance under a predetermined shear exposure condition.
- the adjustment information of the adjustment device is the adjustment information of the adjustment device.
- the difference, the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the target exposure condition, and the fringe-Zezel two-polynomial (hereinafter, referred to as the Zernike polynomial) are obtained.
- a Zernike sensitivity table indicating a relationship with the coefficient of each term
- a wavefront aberration change table including a parameter group indicating a relationship between adjustment of the adjusting device and a change in wavefront aberration of the projection optical system; and a relationship with the adjustment amount.
- the predetermined target value of the imaging performance includes a case where the target value of the imaging performance (for example, aberration) is zero.
- relational expression may be an expression including a weighting function for weighting any of the terms of the Zernike polynomial.
- the weight may be set so that the weight of a portion outside the allowable range in the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the target exposure condition is increased.
- the determination as to whether or not the imaging performance of the projection optical system of the at least one exposure apparatus is outside the allowable range is performed by the predetermined exposure.
- the adjustment information of the adjustment device under the condition and the information of the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system corresponding to the adjustment information, and the information of the adjusted wavefront aberration obtained based on the appropriate adjustment amount calculated in the first step.
- a Zernike sensitivity table under the target exposure condition, and an imaging performance of the projection optical system under the target exposure condition, and a target value of the imaging performance, which are calculated for each exposure apparatus. May be performed based on the difference.
- the target exposure taking into account the correction information calculated by the correction information after setting the correction information in the second step as a Zernike sensitivity table under the target exposure condition. It is possible to use the Zurnicke sensitivity table under the conditions.
- the predetermined target value may be a target value of imaging performance at at least one evaluation point of the projection optical system.
- the target value of the imaging performance may be a target value of the imaging performance at the selected representative point.
- the appropriate adjustment amount may be calculated by further considering a constraint condition determined by a limit of the adjustment amount by the adjustment device. .
- the appropriate adjustment amount may be calculated with at least a part of a field of view of the projection optical system as an optimization field range.
- the method may further include a number-of-repetitions limiting step of ending the processing. For example, if the permissible range of the imaging performance is very small, or if the correction value of the pattern is not desired to be too large, the correction information (correction value) is set in the above-described optimization processing. No matter how many times, it may not be possible to calculate the appropriate adjustment amounts for all the exposure apparatuses while satisfying the required conditions. In such a case, the processing is terminated when the first step and the second step are repeated a predetermined number of times, so that it is possible to prevent wasting time.
- a pattern determining step of determining information on a pattern to be formed on a mask according to the first pattern determining method of the present invention and using the information on the determined pattern. And forming a pattern on the mask blanks.
- the first pattern determining method of the present invention is used.
- the information of the pattern whose imaging performance is within the allowable range in any of the exposure devices is printed on the mask. Information is determined.
- the pattern forming step a pattern is formed on the mask blank using the information of the determined pattern. Therefore, it is possible to easily manufacture a mask that can be used in common by a plurality of exposure apparatuses.
- the mask manufactured by the first mask manufacturing method of the present invention is mounted on one of the plurality of exposure apparatuses, and the projection optics included in the one exposure apparatus An object is exposed through the mask and the projection optical system while the imaging performance of the system is adjusted according to the pattern of the mask.
- the pattern formed on the mask is determined at the stage of determining the information of the pattern so that the imaging performance of the projection optical system is within an allowable range in any of the plurality of exposure apparatuses.
- the adjustment of the imaging performance is performed by storing the values of the adjustment parameters of the imaging performance (for example, the adjustment amount of the adjustment mechanism) obtained in the step of determining the information of the pattern, and keeping the values as they are.
- the adjustment may be performed by using the parameter, or an appropriate value of the adjustment parameter of the imaging performance may be obtained again.
- the pattern is accurately transferred onto the object by the above exposure.
- a pattern to be formed on the mask is used in a plurality of exposure apparatuses that form a projection image of a pattern formed on a mask on an object via a shadow optical system.
- a pattern determining method for determining information wherein: A second pattern determination method for determining information on the pattern such that both predetermined imaging performances when forming projection images of the pattern by the projection optical systems of a plurality of exposure apparatuses fall within an allowable range.
- both of the predetermined image performance at the time of forming the projection image of the pattern by the projection optical systems of the plurality of exposure apparatuses are within an allowable range.
- the information of the pattern is determined. Therefore, by using the information of the pattern determined by the second pattern determination method of the present invention when manufacturing a mask, it is possible to manufacture (make) a mask that can be commonly used by a plurality of exposure apparatuses. It can be easily realized.
- the pattern determination step when a projection image is formed by the projection optical system of a plurality of exposure apparatuses by the second pattern determination method of the present invention, the image is formed in any of the exposure apparatuses.
- the information of the pattern whose performance is within the allowable range is determined as the information of the pattern to be formed on the mask.
- a pattern is formed on the mask blank using the information of the determined pattern. Therefore, it is possible to easily manufacture a mask that can be used in common by a plurality of exposure apparatuses.
- an imaging performance adjusting method for adjusting an imaging performance of a projection optical system that projects a pattern formed on a mask onto an object comprising: Adjustment information of an adjustment device for adjusting the state of formation of a projected image of the pattern on the object by the projection optical system, information on the imaging performance of the projection optical system, and correction information of the pattern in a mask manufacturing stage Calculating an appropriate adjustment amount of the adjustment device under target exposure conditions in consideration of the correction information of the pattern using: a step of adjusting the adjustment device according to the appropriate adjustment amount.
- the pattern is obtained by using the adjustment information of the adjustment device and the information on the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the predetermined exposure condition (projection condition), and the pattern correction information at the stage of manufacturing the mask.
- the appropriate adjustment amount of the adjustment device under the target exposure condition (projection condition) in consideration of the correction information is calculated. For this reason, it is possible to calculate an adjustment amount that improves the imaging performance of the projection optical system as compared with the case where the pattern correction information is not considered.
- the correction information of the pattern in the mask manufacturing stage can be obtained by using the above-described pattern determination method or the like as an example. Then, by adjusting the adjusting device according to the calculated appropriate adjustment amount, the imaging performance of the projection optical system is adjusted more favorably than when the pattern correction information is not considered. Therefore, the ability to adjust the imaging performance of the projection optical system with respect to the pattern on the mask can be substantially improved.
- the information on the imaging performance may include information on the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system after the adjustment under the predetermined exposure condition.
- the information on the imaging performance may include information on the wavefront aberration of the single projection optical system and the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the predetermined exposure condition.
- the information on the imaging performance is information on a difference between the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the predetermined exposure condition and a predetermined target value of the imaging performance.
- the adjustment information of the adjustment device is information of an adjustment amount of the adjustment device
- the difference, the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the target exposure condition, and the Zernike polynomial indicating the relationship with the coefficient of each term
- a wavefront aberration change table including a parameter group indicating a relationship between adjustment of the adjustment device and a change in wavefront aberration of the projection optical system
- the appropriate adjustment amount can be calculated by using the relational expression.
- relational expression may be an expression including a weighting function for weighting any of the terms of the Zurnicke polynomial.
- an exposure method for transferring a pattern formed on a mask onto an object using a projection optical system wherein the target exposure is performed by using the imaging performance adjusting method of the present invention. Adjusting the imaging performance of the projection optical system under conditions; and transferring the pattern onto the object using the projection optical system with the adjusted imaging performance. Is the way.
- the imaging performance adjusting method of the present invention by using the imaging performance adjusting method of the present invention, the imaging performance of the projection optical system is satisfactorily adjusted, and by using the projection optical system whose imaging performance is satisfactorily adjusted, Under exposure conditions, the pattern is transferred onto an object. Therefore, it is possible to accurately transfer the turn onto the object.
- a projection image of a pattern formed on a mask is formed.
- a pattern determination system for determining information of a pattern to be formed on a mask which is used by a plurality of exposure apparatuses formed on an object via a projection optical system, comprising: a projection optical system; and a projection image of the pattern.
- a plurality of exposure devices each having an adjustment device for adjusting a state of formation on the object, and a computer connected to the plurality of exposure devices via a communication path.
- adjustment information of the adjustment apparatus under predetermined exposure conditions including information of the pattern, and the projection optics corresponding thereto For an exposure apparatus to be optimized selected from the plurality of exposure apparatuses, for each exposure apparatus, adjustment information of the adjustment apparatus under predetermined exposure conditions including information of the pattern, and the projection optics corresponding thereto.
- the pattern based on a plurality of types of information including information on imaging performance of the system, correction information of the pattern, and information on an allowable range of the imaging performance.
- An optimization processing step that is repeated until it is determined that the image performance is within an allowable range; and the optimization is performed when the imaging performance of the projection optical system of all the exposure apparatuses to be optimized is within an allowable range.
- the computer performs the following optimization processing in the optimization processing step for the exposure apparatus to be optimized selected from the plurality of exposure apparatuses connected via the communication path. Do.
- a projected image of the pattern under predetermined exposure conditions including pattern information (information of a known pattern may be used, for example, may be a design value).
- Based on a plurality of types of information including information on an allowable range of the imaging performance, and target exposure conditions in consideration of the correction information of the pattern (the pattern is corrected based on the corrected pattern corrected by the correction information.
- the predetermined imaging performance of the projection optical system of at least one exposure apparatus to be optimized is out of the allowable range under the target exposure conditions described above.
- a second step of setting the correction information based on the imaging performance according to a predetermined criterion is performed.
- the process is repeated until it is determined that the imaging performances of the projection optical systems of all the exposure apparatuses to be optimized are within the allowable range.
- the computer determines the correction set in the optimization processing step in the determination step.
- the information is determined as the pattern correction information.
- the appropriate adjustment amount of each exposure apparatus calculated in the first step, the adjustment information of the adjustment apparatus under the predetermined exposure condition, and the Based on the information on the imaging performance of the projection optical system, as a result of adjustment of the adjustment device according to the appropriate adjustment amount, under the target exposure condition, at least one of the projection optical systems of the exposure device to be optimized is A first determining step of determining whether or not a predetermined imaging performance is outside the allowable range; and a result of the determination in the first determining step, at least one of the projection optical systems of the exposure apparatuses to be optimized.
- a setting step of setting correction information according to a predetermined criterion based on the imaging performance out of the allowable range can be executed. .
- the appropriate adjustment amount of each exposure apparatus calculated in the first step, the correction information set in the setting step, the adjustment information of the adjustment apparatus under the predetermined exposure condition, and the corresponding information Based on the information on the imaging performance of the projection optical system and the information on the permissible range of the imaging performance, as a result of adjustment of the adjusting device according to the appropriate adjustment amount, at least under the target exposure condition, A second determination step of determining whether or not the predetermined imaging performance of the projection optical system of one exposure apparatus to be optimized falls outside the allowable range may be further executed.
- the predetermined criterion is a criterion based on an imaging performance that is out of an allowable range, and is a criterion for correcting a pattern such that the imaging performance is within an allowable range. It can be.
- the computer sets the correction information based on an average value of residual errors of imaging performance of the plurality of exposure apparatuses to be optimized. be able to.
- the information on the imaging performance of the projection optical system includes information on a difference between the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the predetermined exposure condition and a predetermined target value of the imaging performance.
- the adjustment information of the adjustment device is the adjustment device
- the computer determines the difference, the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the target exposure condition, and A Zernike sensitivity table showing the relationship between the coefficients of each term of the Lunike polynomial, a wavefront aberration change table consisting of a parameter group showing the relationship between the adjustment of the adjustment device and the change in the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system, and the adjustment
- the appropriate adjustment amount can be calculated for each exposure apparatus using a relational expression with the amount.
- the predetermined target value can be a target value of the imaging performance at at least one evaluation point of the projection optical system, which is input from outside.
- the target value of the imaging performance may be a target value of the imaging performance at the selected representative point, or the target value of the imaging performance may be the projection optical system.
- the target value of the coefficient set to improve the bad component based on the decomposition coefficient after the decomposition of the imaging performance of the lens by the aberration decomposition method is the converted target value of the imaging performance. It can also be.
- the relational expression may be an expression including a weighting function for weighting an arbitrary term among the terms of the Zernike polynomials.
- the computer further executes a procedure of displaying the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the predetermined exposure condition in different colors inside and outside an allowable range and displaying the weight setting screen. It can be.
- the weight may be set such that a weight of a portion outside an allowable range in the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the target exposure condition is increased. can do.
- the computer in the second step, may further include information on adjustment information of the adjustment device under the predetermined exposure condition, information on wavefront aberration of the projection optical system corresponding to the adjustment information, and information on the first step.
- Information on the adjusted wavefront aberration obtained based on the appropriate adjustment amount calculated in the step (1), and the relationship between the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the target exposure condition and the coefficient of each term of the Zernike polynomial.
- a Zernike sensitivity table indicating a relationship between the target and the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the target exposure condition, which is calculated for each exposure apparatus based on: It may be determined whether or not a predetermined imaging performance of the projection optical system of the at least one exposure apparatus falls outside the allowable range.
- the computer in the second step, after setting the correction information, the computer creates a Zernike sensitivity table under target exposure conditions in consideration of the correction information by calculation, and thereafter,
- the Zernike sensitivity table can be used as the Zernike sensitivity table under the target exposure conditions.
- the predetermined target value may be a target value of imaging performance at at least one evaluation point of the projection optical system, which is input from outside.
- the target value of the imaging performance may be a target value of the imaging performance at the selected representative point.
- the computer may calculate the appropriate adjustment amount by further considering a constraint condition determined by a limit of the adjustment amount by the adjustment device. it can.
- at least a part of the field of view of the projection optical system can be externally set as an optimization field range in the computer.
- the computer determines whether the first step and the second step have been repeated a predetermined number of times, and in the second step, the projection optical systems of all the exposure apparatuses to be optimized. If it is determined that the predetermined number of times has been repeated before it is determined that the imaging performance is within the allowable range, the processing may be terminated.
- the computer may include
- the computer may be a control computer for controlling any one of the components of the optical device.
- the present invention provides an exposure apparatus for transferring a pattern formed on a mask onto an object via a projection optical system, the exposure apparatus comprising: An adjusting device that adjusts the state of formation in the device; a signal line connected to the adjusting device; and, under predetermined exposure conditions, the adjustment information and the information on the imaging performance of the projection optical system, and a mask manufacturing step.
- An adjusting device that adjusts the state of formation in the device
- a signal line connected to the adjusting device
- the adjustment information and the information on the imaging performance of the projection optical system and a mask manufacturing step.
- an appropriate adjustment amount of the adjustment device under the target exposure condition in consideration of the correction information of the pattern is calculated, and the adjustment device is adjusted based on the calculated adjustment amount.
- a processing device to be controlled.
- the processing apparatus uses the adjustment information under predetermined exposure conditions, the information regarding the imaging performance of the projection optical system, and the correction information of the pattern in a mask manufacturing stage, to determine the pattern.
- An appropriate adjustment amount of the adjustment device under the target exposure condition in consideration of the correction information is calculated, and the adjustment device is controlled based on the calculated adjustment amount.
- the pattern correction information in the mask manufacturing stage can be obtained by using the above-described pattern determination method or the like as an example.
- the processing device can calculate the adjustment amount such that the imaging performance of the projection optical system becomes better than when the pattern correction information is not considered. Further, even when it is difficult to calculate an adjustment amount such that the imaging performance of the projection optical system falls within a predetermined allowable range under the target exposure condition without considering the pattern correction information, The processing device calculates the adjustment amount of the adjustment device under the target exposure condition in consideration of the pattern correction information, thereby calculating the adjustment amount such that the imaging performance of the projection optical system falls within a predetermined allowable range. May be possible.
- the processing device controls the adjusting device according to the calculated adjustment amount, so that the imaging performance of the projection optical system is adjusted better than when the pattern correction information is not considered. Is adjusted. Therefore, by transferring the pattern on the mask onto the object via the adjusted projection optical system, the pattern can be accurately transferred onto the object.
- the present invention provides a mask for designing a mask used in a plurality of exposure apparatuses that forms a projection image of a pattern formed on a mask on an object via a projection optical system.
- target exposure conditions in which the correction information on the pattern is considered.
- the result of the determination in the second step is that the image forming performance of the projection optical systems of all the exposure apparatuses is within an allowable range.
- An optimization processing procedure that is repeated until it is determined that the correction information set in the optimization processing procedure is a pattern when the imaging performance of the projection optical systems of all the exposure apparatuses is within an allowable range. And a determination procedure for determining as the correction information.
- This program is installed in a computer in which, for each exposure apparatus, adjustment information of an adjustment apparatus under predetermined exposure conditions, information relating to the imaging performance of the projection optical system, and correction of the pattern
- the computer performs the following optimization processing procedure in response to the input. That is, adjustment for adjusting the state of formation of the projected image of the pattern on the object under predetermined exposure conditions including pattern information (information of a known pattern may be used, for example, may be a design value).
- An appropriate adjustment amount of the adjusting device under the target exposure condition in consideration of the correction information (the target exposure condition in which the pattern is replaced with a corrected pattern corrected by the correction information) is calculated for each exposure device.
- the result of the determination in the second step is that the image forming performance of the projection optical systems of all the exposure apparatuses is allowed. Repeat until determined to be within range.
- the computer determines the correction information set in the above-described optimization processing procedure as pattern correction information.
- a plurality of This makes it possible to easily manufacture (manufacture) a mask that can be used in common in any of the exposure apparatuses. That is, according to the program of the present invention, a mask used in a plurality of exposure apparatuses is Can be easily designed.
- the predetermined imaging performance of the projection optical system of at least one exposure device is out of the allowable range.
- a first judgment procedure for judging whether or not the projection optical system is determined as to whether the imaging performance of the projection optical system of at least one exposure apparatus is out of the allowable range.
- the appropriate adjustment amount of each exposure apparatus calculated in the first procedure, the correction information set in the setting procedure, and the adjustment of the adjustment apparatus under the predetermined exposure condition Based on the information and information on the image performance of the projection optical system corresponding to the information, and information on the allowable range of the imaging performance, as a result of adjustment of the adjustment device according to the appropriate adjustment amount, the target exposure condition
- the second determination procedure for determining whether or not the predetermined imaging performance of the projection optical system of at least one exposure apparatus is out of the allowable range is further performed by the combiner. be able to.
- the predetermined criterion is a criterion based on the imaging performance out of the allowable range, and may be a criterion for correcting a pattern such that the imaging performance is in the allowable range.
- the correction information may be a reference that is set based on an average value of residual errors in imaging performance of the plurality of exposure apparatuses.
- the information on the imaging performance may include information on a wavefront aberration of the projection optical system after adjustment under the predetermined exposure condition, or information on the imaging performance. Is a single unit of the projection optical system. It may also include information on the wavefront aberration and the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the predetermined exposure condition.
- the information on the imaging performance of the projection optical system is information on a difference between the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the predetermined exposure condition and a predetermined target value of the imaging performance
- the adjustment information of the adjustment device is information on an adjustment amount of the adjustment device
- the difference, the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the target exposure condition, and the Zernike polynomial A Zernike sensitivity table showing a relationship with the coefficient of each term
- a wavefront aberration change table including a parameter group showing a relationship between adjustment of the adjustment device and a change in wavefront aberration of the projection optical system
- the computer may execute the procedure of calculating the appropriate adjustment amount for each exposure apparatus using the relational expression.
- the computer may further execute a procedure of displaying the setting screen of the target value at each evaluation point in the visual field of the projection optical system, or A step of displaying the target value setting screen together with the decomposition coefficients after the decomposition by subjecting the image performance into components by the aberration decomposition method; and forming the target values of the coefficients set in response to the display of the setting screen into the image. And a step of converting to a performance target value.
- the relational expression may be an expression including a weighting function for weighting an arbitrary term among the terms of the Zernike polynomial.
- the computer further executes a procedure of displaying the imaging performance of the projection optical system under the reference exposure condition in different colors inside and outside an allowable range and displaying the weight setting screen on the computer. It can be done.
- the second step under the predetermined exposure condition, Information on the adjusted wavefront aberration obtained based on the adjustment information of the adjustment device and the information on the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system corresponding thereto, and the appropriate adjustment amount calculated in the first procedure.
- a Zernike sensitivity table indicating a relationship between coefficients of each term of the Zernike polynomial, calculated for each exposure apparatus.
- a difference between the imaging performance of the projection optical system and the target value of the imaging performance whether or not the predetermined imaging performance of the projection optical system of the at least one exposure apparatus falls outside the allowable range. Is determined by the computer.
- a Zernike sensitivity table under target exposure conditions in consideration of the correction information is created by calculation.
- the computer may be caused to execute a procedure used as a Zurnicke sensitivity table under the target exposure condition.
- the computer in the optimization processing procedure, may be configured to calculate the appropriate adjustment amount by further considering a constraint condition determined by a limit of the adjustment amount by the adjustment device. it can.
- the computer in the optimization processing procedure, is configured to calculate the appropriate adjustment amount by setting at least a part of the field of view of the projection optical system as an optimization field range in accordance with an external designation. According to the program of the present invention, it is determined whether or not the first step and the second step have been repeated a predetermined number of times, and the imaging performance of the projection optical systems of all the exposure apparatuses is within an allowable range. If it is determined that the process has been repeated the predetermined number of times before it is determined that the process has been performed, the computer may be further caused to execute a procedure of terminating the process.
- the present invention is an information recording medium readable by a computer recording a program of the present invention.
- any of the first to third exposure methods of the present invention By transferring the device pattern onto the sensitive object by using the device, the device pattern can be formed on the sensitive object with high accuracy, and thereby a higher-density microdevice can be manufactured with a high yield. Therefore, from another viewpoint, the present invention can be said to be a device manufacturing method including a step of transferring a device pattern onto a sensitive object using the first to third exposure methods of the present invention.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a device manufacturing system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a diagram schematically showing a configuration of the first exposure apparatus 922 of FIG.
- FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view showing an example of a wavefront aberration measuring device.
- FIG. 4A is a diagram showing a light beam emitted from the microlens array when the optical system has no aberration
- FIG. 4B is a diagram showing a light beam emitted from the microlens array when the optical system has aberration.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an example of a processing algorithm executed by the CPU in the second computer.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart (No. 1) showing the processing in step 114 of FIG.
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart (part 2) showing the processing in step 114 of FIG.
- FIG. 8 is a flowchart (part 3) showing the processing in step 114 of FIG.
- FIG. 9 is a flowchart (part 4) showing the processing in step 114 of FIG.
- FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing the processing in step 114 of FIG. 5).
- FIG. 11 is a diagram schematically showing processing when a constraint condition is violated.
- FIG. 12 is a plan view showing an example of a working reticle that was used in experiments on aberration optimization and pattern correction for multiple units (Unit A and Unit B).
- Figure 13A shows an example of the aberration optimization results for Units A and B when the working reticle of Figure 12 was used and the pattern correction was not performed.
- Figure 13B shows Figure 13A.
- Figure 13C shows an example of the result when pattern correction is performed in the same aberration-optimized state for Units A and B as in Figure 13.
- Figure 13C shows the same pattern correction as in Figure 13B, and after correction
- FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of a result obtained by optimizing aberrations of the A-unit and the B-unit for the pattern of FIG.
- FIG. 14 is a flowchart (part 1) illustrating an example of an operation when manufacturing a reticle using a reticle design system and a reticle manufacturing system.
- FIG. 15 is a flowchart (part 2) illustrating an example of an operation when manufacturing a single reticle using the reticle design system and the reticle manufacturing system.
- FIG. 16 is a flowchart (part 3) illustrating an example of the operation when manufacturing a reticle using the reticle design system and the reticle manufacturing system.
- FIG. 17 is a plan view showing an example of an existing master reticle used when manufacturing the working reticle of FIG.
- FIG. 18 is a diagram conceptually showing a state of the joint exposure using the master reticle of FIG. 17 and two types of newly manufactured master reticles.
- FIG. 19 is a flowchart showing another example of the processing algorithm executed by the CPU in the second computer.
- FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a computer system according to a modification. BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
- FIG. 1 shows a partially omitted overall configuration of a device manufacturing system 10 as a pattern determination system according to one embodiment.
- the device manufacturing system 10 shown in FIG. 1 is an in-house LAN system built in a semiconductor factory of a device maker (hereinafter, appropriately referred to as “manufacturer AJ”) who is a user of the device manufacturing apparatus such as an exposure apparatus.
- the computer system 10 includes a lithography system 912 including a first computer 920 and installed in a clean room, and a local area as a communication path to the first computer 920 constituting the lithography system 912.
- a separate clean room including a reticle design system 932 including a second computer 930 connected via a network (LAN) 926 and a computer 940 for process management connected to the second computer 930 via a LAN 936 And a reticle manufacturing system 942 installed in the reticle.
- LAN network
- the lithography system 91 2 a first computer 920 consisting of medium-sized computers connected to each other via the LAN 91 8, the first exposure apparatus 922Iota, the second exposure apparatus 922 2, ... 'the N exposure device 922 N ( In the following, it is collectively referred to as “exposure device 922” as appropriate.
- FIG. 2 shows a schematic configuration of the first exposure apparatus 922 ⁇ .
- the exposure apparatus 922 is a step-and-scan type scanning projection exposure apparatus using a pulse laser light source as an exposure light source (hereinafter, referred to as a “light source”), that is, a so-called “scanning” stepper (scanner).
- the exposure apparatus 922 includes an illumination system including a light source 16 and an illumination optical system 12, and a mask stage that holds a reticle R as a mask illuminated by exposure illumination light EL as an energy beam from the illumination system.
- Reticle stage RS T a projection optical system PL for projecting the exposure illumination light EL emitted from the reticle R onto the wafer W (on the image plane) as an object, and a wafer stage WS on which a Z tilt stage 58 holding the wafer W is mounted. And a control system for them.
- a pulse ultraviolet light which outputs pulse light in a vacuum ultraviolet region such as an F 2 laser (output wavelength: 157 nm) or an ArF excimer laser (output wavelength: 193 nm) is used.
- a light source is used.
- a light source that outputs pulsed light in the far ultraviolet or ultraviolet region such as a KrF excimer laser (output wavelength: 248 nm), may be used.
- the light source 16 is provided with a chamber 11 in which the components of the illumination optical system 12 and an exposure apparatus main body including a reticle stage RST, a projection optical system PL, a wafer stage WST, and the like are housed. It is installed in a low-clean service room separate from the clean room, and is connected to the chamber 11 via a light-transmitting optical system (not shown) that includes at least part of an optical axis adjustment optical system called a beam matching unit. Connected.
- the internal controller based on the control information TS from the main controller 50, the internal controller turns on and off the output of the laser beam LB, the energy per pulse of the laser beam LB, the oscillation frequency (repetition rate). The return frequency, the center wavelength, and the spectral half width (wavelength width) are controlled.
- the illumination optical system 12 includes a beam shaping unit including a cylinder lens, a beam expander (not shown), an optical integrator (homogenizer) 22, and the like, an illuminance uniforming optical system 20, an illumination system aperture stop plate 24, It has a first relay lens 28 A, a second relay lens 28 B, a fixed reticle blind 3 OA, a movable reticle blind 30 B, a mirror M for bending the optical path, a condenser lens 32, and the like.
- a fly-eye lens, a good integrator (internal reflection type integrator), a diffractive optical element, or the like can be used.
- the optical integrator 2 2 Since a fly-eye lens is used as a lens, it is also referred to as a fly-eye lens 22 hereinafter.
- the beam shaping / illuminance uniforming optical system 20 is connected to a light transmitting optical system (not shown) via a light transmitting window 17 provided in the chamber 11.
- the beam shaping / illumination uniforming optical system 20 uses a laser beam B emitted from the light source 16 and enters through the light transmission window 17 to form a cross section of the laser beam B, for example, using a cylinder lens or a beam expander. Shape it.
- the fly-eye lens 22 located on the emission end side inside the beam shaping / illuminance uniforming optical system 20 is provided with a laser whose cross-sectional shape is shaped in order to illuminate the reticle R with a uniform illuminance distribution.
- a surface light source composed of a number of point light sources (light source images) is formed on the exit-side focal plane, which is arranged so as to substantially coincide with the pupil plane of the illumination optical system 12.
- secondary light source or al emitted by the laser beam or less in the vicinity of the exit-side focal plane of the c fly-eye lens 2 2 is referred to as "illumination light EL", an illumination system aperture consisting of a disc-shaped member An aperture plate 24 is provided.
- the illumination system aperture stop plate 24 is provided at substantially equal angular intervals, for example, an aperture stop (normal stop) composed of a normal circular aperture, and a sigma value, which is a recoherence factor, smaller than a small circular aperture.
- the illumination system aperture stop plate 24 is configured to be rotated by a drive device 40 such as a motor controlled by a main control device 50, so that one of the aperture stops can be used for the illumination light EL. It is selectively set on the optical path, and the shape of the light source surface in Koehler illumination described later is limited to an annular zone, a small circle, a large circle, or a fourth circle.
- a plurality of illumination light systems are distributed in different regions on the pupil plane of the illumination optical system, Diffraction along the optical axis IX of the diffractive optical element and illumination optical system
- At least one is movable, that is, a plurality of prisms (cone prism, polyhedral prism, etc.) whose distance in the optical axis direction of the illumination optical system is variable, and an optical unit including at least one zoom optical system (forming optical system) ) Is disposed between the light source 16 and the optical integrator 22, and when the optical integrator 22 is a fly-eye lens, the intensity distribution of the illumination light on the incident surface thereof is determined by the optical integrator 22.
- a type integrator by changing the range of the angle of incidence of the illumination light on the incident surface, the light intensity distribution (size and shape of the secondary light source) on the pupil plane of the illumination optical system, that is, It is desirable to reduce the light loss due to the change of the illumination condition of Reticle R.
- a plurality of light source images (virtual images) formed by the internal reflection type integrator are also referred to as secondary light sources.
- a variable aperture stop (iris stop) for the purpose of dimming flare instead of setting the light quantity distribution of the illumination light on the pupil plane of the illumination optical system may be used together with the shaping optical system.
- the fixed reticle blind 3OA is arranged on a plane slightly defocused from a conjugate plane with respect to the pattern plane of the reticle R, and has a rectangular opening defining the illumination area IAR on the reticle R.
- a movable reticle blind 30B having an opening whose position and width in the direction corresponding to the scanning direction is variable is arranged near the fixed reticle blind 30A, and is movable at the start and end of scanning exposure.
- the movable reticle blind 30B has a variable opening width in the direction corresponding to the non-scanning direction orthogonal to the scanning direction, and the illumination area IAR varies depending on the pattern of the reticle R to be transferred onto the wafer. Can be adjusted in the non-scanning direction.
- the fixed reticle blind 30A is defocused and arranged so that the intensity distribution of the illumination light I on the reticle R in the scanning direction is substantially trapezoidal, but another configuration is adopted.
- a density filter that gradually increases the dimming rate in the peripheral area, or a diffractive optical element that partially diffracts the illumination light, etc., is arranged in the illumination optical system, and the intensity distribution of the illumination light IL is trapezoidal.
- the fixed reticle blind 30A and the movable reticle blind 30B are provided. However, only the movable reticle blind may be provided without the fixed reticle blind.
- the fixed reticle blind may not be required.
- a movable reticle blind (masking blade) is arranged close to the exit surface of the internal reflection type integrator so as to substantially coincide with a conjugate plane with the pattern surface of the reticle.
- a bending mirror M for reflecting the illumination light EL passing through the second relay lens 28 B toward the reticle R is provided.
- the condenser lens 32 is disposed on the optical path of the illumination light EL behind the mirror M.
- the entrance surface of the fly-eye lens 22, the arrangement surface of the movable reticle blind 30B, and the pattern surface of the reticle R (the object surface of the projection optical system PL) are set optically conjugate to each other.
- the light source surface (pupil plane of the illumination optical system) formed on the exit-side focal plane of the fly-eye lens 22 and the Fourier transform plane (projection pupil plane) of the projection optical system PL are optically conjugated to each other. It is a Koehler lighting system.
- the operation of the illumination system configured as described above will be briefly described.
- the laser beam LB pulsed from the light source 16 enters the beam shaping / illumination uniformizing optical system 20 and is radiated to form a sectional shape.
- the light enters the fly-eye lens 22.
- the above-mentioned secondary light source is formed on the emission-side focal plane of the fly-eye lens 22.
- the illumination light EL emitted from the secondary light source passes through one of the aperture stops on the illumination system aperture stop plate 24, passes through the first relay lens 28A, and is fixed reticle blind 3OA and movable.
- a rectangular or rectangular slit-shaped illumination area IAR on the reticle R is illuminated with a uniform illumination distribution.
- the illumination area IAR is elongated in the X-axis direction, and its center is assumed to be substantially coincident with the optical axis AX of the projection optical system PL.
- a reticle R is mounted on the reticle stage RST, and is attracted and held via an electrostatic chuck (or vacuum chuck) (not shown) or the like.
- the reticle stage RST can be finely driven in a horizontal plane (XY plane) by a reticle stage drive unit (not shown) including a linear motor and the like. The direction is assumed to be within the specified stroke range.
- the position of the reticle stage RST in the XY plane is set at a predetermined resolution (for example, about 0.5 to 1 nm) by a reticle laser interferometer 54R provided on the reticle stage RST or via a formed reflecting surface. (Resolution), and the measurement result is supplied to the main controller 50.
- the material used for the reticle R needs to be properly used depending on the light source used. That, A r F excimer laser, if a light source K r F excimer laser, synthetic quartz, fluoride crystal such as fluorite or a fluorine-doped quartz or the like can be used, in the case of using the F 2 laser Must be formed of fluoride crystals such as fluorite or fluorine-doped quartz.
- the projection optical system PL for example, a both-side telecentric reduction system is used.
- the projection magnification of the projection optical system PL is, for example, 14, 15, or 1Z6. Therefore, as described above, the illumination light EL causes When the illumination area IAR is illuminated, the pattern formed on the reticle R is projected onto the wafer W on the surface of which a resist (photosensitive agent) is applied by reducing the image reduced by the projection magnification by the projection optical system PL.
- a slit-shaped exposure area (area conjugate to the illumination area IAR) is formed in IA.
- a refraction system including only a plurality of, for example, about 10 to 20 refraction optical elements (lens elements) 13 is used.
- lens elements 13 constituting the projection optical system PL a plurality of lens elements 13 on the object plane side (the reticle R side) (here, five elements for simplicity of description) are used.
- 1 3 2 1 3 3 1 34, 1 35, the imaging performance correction controller port - has a drivable movable lens from the outside by La 48.
- Lens element 1 3 ⁇ to 1 3 5 is held to the lens holder having a double structure (not shown) in the barrel via, respectively.
- These lens elements 1 3 ⁇ to 1 3 5 are respectively held by inner lens holders, and these inner lens holders are supported by an unillustrated driving element, for example, a piezo element, at three points in the direction of gravity with respect to the outer lens holder. ing. And, by independently adjusting the voltage applied to the drive element, shift driving each of the lens element 1 3 ⁇ 1 3 5 in the Z axis direction is the optical axis direction of the projection optical system PL, and the XY inclination direction with respect to the plane (i.e. X-axis rotation direction (SX) and Y-axis rotation direction (0 y)) to be driven that it the (tiltable) configuration.
- an unillustrated driving element for example, a piezo element
- lens elements 13 are held in a lens barrel via a normal lens holder.
- the present invention is not limited to the lens element 1 3 ⁇ 1 3 5, the pupil plane vicinity of the projection optical system PL, and or a lens arranged on the image plane side or the aberration of the projection optical system PL, and, in particular, correct the non-rotationally symmetric element
- An aberration correction plate (optical plate) or the like may be configured to be drivable.
- the degrees of freedom (movable directions) of the drivable optical elements are not limited to one, but may be one, two, or four or more.
- the lens barrel structure of the projection optical system PL and the drive mechanism of the lens element are limited to the above-described configuration. It does not matter.
- a pupil aperture stop 15 capable of continuously changing the numerical aperture (N.A.) within a predetermined range is provided.
- a so-called iris stop is used as the ⁇ aperture stop.15.
- the pupil aperture stop 15 is controlled by the main controller 50.
- each lens element constituting the projection optical system PL is made of a fluoride crystal such as fluorite or the above-mentioned fluorine-doped.
- quartz although synthetic quartz may be used to, in the case of using the F 2 laser light, the material of the projection optical system PL lenses that are used, the fluoride crystal or fluorine-doped quartz all fluorite, etc. Is used.
- the wafer stage WST is freely driven in a two-dimensional XY plane by a wafer stage drive unit 56 including a linear motor and the like.
- a wafer W is held on a Z tilt stage 58 mounted on the wafer stage WST by electrostatic suction (or vacuum suction) or the like via a wafer holder (not shown).
- the Z tilt stage 58 is moved on the wafer stage WST by a drive system (not shown) in the Z-axis direction and tilted with respect to the XY plane (that is, the rotation direction (0 X) around the X-axis and the rotation direction around the Y-axis). It can be driven (tilted) in the rotation direction (0 y)). As a result, the surface position (the position in the Z-axis direction and the inclination with respect to the XY plane) of the wafer W held on the Z tilt stage 58 is set to a desired state.
- a movable mirror 52 W is fixed on the Z tilt stage 58, and the X-axis direction, X-axis direction, and 0 Z direction of the Z tilt stage 58 are fixed by an externally disposed wafer laser interferometer 54 W.
- the position in the direction (rotational direction around the Z axis) is measured, and the position information measured by the interferometer 54 W is supplied to the main controller 50.
- Main control unit The device 50 is a wafer stage drive unit 56 based on the measured value of the interferometer 54 W (this includes all of the drive system of the wafer stage WST and the drive system of the Z tilt stage 58).
- the wafer stage WST (and Z tilt stage 58) is controlled via the.
- a reflecting surface formed by mirror-finishing the end surface (side surface) of the Z tilt stage 58 may be used.
- a wavefront aberration measuring device 80 as a detachable portable wavefront measuring device is attached to the side surface of the Z tilt stage 58 on the + Y side (the right side in the paper of FIG. 2).
- the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 includes a hollow housing 82 and a plurality of optical elements arranged inside the housing 82 in a predetermined positional relationship.
- a system 84 and a light receiving unit 86 arranged at one end on the X side inside the housing 82 are provided.
- the housing 82 is made of a member having an L-shaped XZ cross section and a space formed therein, and light from above the housing 82 is provided at the uppermost portion (the end in the + Z direction).
- a circular opening 82a is formed in a plan view (as viewed from above) so as to be incident toward the internal space of No. 2.
- a cover glass 88 is provided so as to cover the opening 82 a from the inside of the housing 82.
- a light-shielding film having a circular opening in the center is formed by vapor deposition of a metal such as chromium, and the light-shielding film is used to measure the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system PL. Unnecessary light from the surroundings is blocked from entering the light receiving optical system 84.
- the light receiving optical system 84 includes an objective lens 84 a, a relay lens 84 b, and a bend that are sequentially arranged from top to bottom below the cover glass 88 inside the housing 82. It is composed of a mirror 84c, a collimator lens 84d and a microlens array 84e arranged sequentially on one X side of the bending mirror 84c.
- the bending mirror 84c is inclined at 45 °, and the optical path of the light incident on the objective lens 84a vertically downward from above is collimated by the bending mirror 84c. It is designed to be bent toward a single lens 84 d.
- Each optical member constituting the light receiving optical system 84 is fixed to the inside of the wall of the housing 82 via a holding member (not shown).
- the micro lens array 84e is configured by arranging a plurality of small convex lenses (lens elements) in an array on a plane orthogonal to the optical path.
- the light receiving section 86 is composed of a light receiving element composed of a two-dimensional CCD or the like, and an electric circuit such as a charge transfer control circuit.
- the light receiving element has an area sufficient to receive all of the light beams that enter the objective lens 84a and exit from the microlens array 84e.
- the measurement data from the light receiving unit 86 is output to the main controller 50 via a signal line (not shown) or by wireless transmission.
- the measurement of the wavefront difference of the projection optical system PL can be performed on-pod. A method for measuring the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system PL using the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 will be described later.
- the exposure apparatus 9 2 2 i of the present embodiment has a light source whose on / off is controlled by the main controller 50, and has a large number of pins facing the image plane of the projection optical system PL.
- Irradiation system 60a for irradiating the imaging light beam for forming an image of a hole or a slit from the oblique direction with respect to the optical axis AX, and receives the reflected light beam of the imaging light beam on the surface of the wafer W
- a multi-point focal position detection system (hereinafter, simply referred to as a “focus position detection system”) of the incident light type, which includes a light receiving system 60 b that performs the operation, is provided.
- Examples of the focal position detection system (60a, 60b) include, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. Hei 6-284304 and U.S. Patent Nos. 5,448,333 corresponding to U. And those having the same configuration as that disclosed in the above publication. Designated country (or selected election) designated in this international application To the extent permitted by national laws of United States of America, the disclosures in the above-mentioned publications and U.S. patents are incorporated herein by reference.
- measurement points to which the imaging light beam is irradiated are set not only in the above-described exposure area IA but also outside the exposure area IA. It is sufficient to set multiple measurement points only inside the area IA.
- the shape of the irradiation area of the imaging light beam at each measurement point is not limited to the pinhole slit, but may be another shape such as a parallelogram or a rhombus.
- the focus / defocus signal (defocus signal) from the light receiving system 60b for example, based on the S-curve signal, is set so that the defocus becomes zero.
- the main controller 50 uses the focal position detection system (60a, 60b) to measure and align the Z position of the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 when measuring the wavefront aberration described later. I do. At this time, the inclination of the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 may be measured as needed.
- the exposure apparatus 922 i is provided with an off-axis (off-axis) used for position measurement of an alignment mark on the wafer W held on the wafer stage WST and a reference mark formed on the reference mark plate FM. It has an ALG-based alignment ALG.
- the alignment type ALG irradiates the target mark with a broadband detection light beam that does not expose the resist on the wafer, and forms an image of the target mark formed on the light receiving surface by reflected light from the target mark.
- An image processing type FIA (Field Image Alignment) sensor that captures an image of an index (not shown) using an image sensor (CCD or the like) and outputs an image signal thereof is used.
- FIA Field Image Alignment
- a target mark is irradiated with coherent detection light to detect scattered or diffracted light generated from the target mark, or two diffracted lights generated from the target mark (for example, the same order).
- coherent detection light For interference detection It is, of course, possible to use the sensor individually or in combination as appropriate.
- a reticle mark (or a reticle stage RST) on the reticle R is provided above the reticle R via the projection optical system PL.
- a pair of reticle alignment systems consisting of a TTR (Through The Reticle) alignment system using light of an exposure wavelength for simultaneously observing a reference mark) and a corresponding reference mark on the reference mark plate are provided. I have.
- the alignment system ALG and the reticle alignment system are disclosed in, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 7-176468 and US Patent Nos. 5,646,413 corresponding thereto. The same configuration is used. To the extent permitted by the national laws of the designated country (or selected elected country) specified in this international application, the disclosures in the above-mentioned gazettes and US patents are incorporated herein by reference.
- the control system is mainly configured by the main controller 50 in FIG.
- the main control unit 50 is composed of a so-called workstation (or microcomputer) composed of a CPU (central processing unit), ROM (read 'only' memory), RAM (random access memory), etc. In addition to performing the various control operations described above, it also controls the entire system.
- the main controller 50 includes, for example, a storage device 42 including a hard disk, an input device 45 including a pointing device such as a keyboard and a mouse, and a display device such as a CRT display (or a liquid crystal display). 4 4 and a drive device 4 6 for an information recording medium such as CD (compact disc), DVD (digital versatile disc), MO (magneto-optical disc) or FD (flexible disc) is connected externally. . Further, the main controller 50 is connected to the above-described LAN 918.
- a PMI Phase Measurement Interferometer
- the measurement data of the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system PL alone (hereinafter, referred to as “simple wavefront aberration”) measured by the wavefront aberration measuring instrument called ”is stored.
- the storage device 42 has an appropriate formation state of a projection image projected onto the wafer W by, for example, the projection optical system P under a plurality of reference exposure conditions as described later (for example, the aberration is zero). Or less than the allowable value) so that the position of each of the movable lenses 13 l to 13 5 in the directions of three degrees of freedom, the Z position and tilt of the wafer W (Z tilt stage 58), and the wavelength of the illumination light;
- the data of the wavefront aberration measured by the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 or the data of the wavefront aberration correction amount (difference between the wavefront aberration and the above-described single wavefront aberration) and the information of the adjustment amount at that time After adjusting the wavefront aberration, the data of the wavefront aberration measured by the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 or the data of the wavefront aberration correction amount (difference between the wavefront aberration and the above-described single wavefront aberration) and the information of the adjustment amount at that time.
- each of the above-mentioned exposure conditions serving as the reference is managed by ID as identification information. Therefore, each exposure condition serving as the reference is hereinafter referred to as a reference ID. That is, the storage device 42 stores information on the adjustment amounts for a plurality of reference IDs, and data on the wavefront aberration or the wavefront aberration correction amount.
- the positional deviation measured using the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 as described later is calculated according to each of the Zernike polynomials.
- the remaining exposure apparatus 9222, 922 3, ?? 922 N is configured similarly to the exposure apparatus 92 2.1 described above.
- the reticle design system 932 is a system for designing a reticle (pattern) as a mask.
- the reticle design system 932 includes a second computer 930 including a medium-sized computer (or a large computer), and design terminals 936A to 936D including small computers connected to the second computer 930 via a LAN 934. , Optical simulation It has a computer 938 for one night.
- a partial design of a reticle pattern corresponding to the circuit pattern (chip pattern) of each layer such as a semiconductor element is performed.
- the second computer 930 also serves as a circuit design central control device, and the second computer 930 manages the sharing of the design area among the terminals 936A to 936D. .
- the reticle pattern designed for each of the terminals 936A-936D has a part with severe line width accuracy and a part that is relatively loose, and the position where the circuit can be divided in each of the terminals 936A to 936D ( For example, identification information for identifying a portion having a low line width accuracy) is generated, and this identification information is transmitted to the second computer 930 together with the design data of the partial reticle pattern.
- the second computer 930 transmits the information of the design data of the reticle pattern used in each layer and the identification information indicating the divisible position to the computer 940 for process management in the reticle manufacturing system 942 via the LAN 936. Transmit.
- the reticle manufacturing system 942 is a system for manufacturing a working reticle on which a transfer pattern designed by the reticle design system 932 is formed.
- the reticle manufacturing system 942 includes a computer 940 for process control composed of a medium-sized computer, an EB (electron beam) exposure apparatus 944 interconnected to the computer 940 via a LAN 948, 946, and a light exposure device 945.
- the EB exposure device 944 and the CZD 946 and the CZD 946 and the light exposure device 945 are connected in-line via interface units 947 and 949, respectively.
- the CZD 946 performs application of a resist on a substrate (reticle planks) serving as a master reticle or a working reticle and development after exposure of the substrate.
- a substrate reticle planks
- the same scanning step as the exposure device 922 described above is used.
- a substrate holder for holding a reticle planks as a substrate is provided instead of the wafer holder.
- a substrate is provided between a vacuum atmosphere in the EB exposure apparatus 944 and a CZD 946 in a predetermined gas atmosphere at substantially atmospheric pressure.
- a substrate transfer system is provided to transfer the reticle planks for the master reticle.
- a substrate (a master reticle or a working reticle) is placed between the CZD, both of which are in a predetermined gas atmosphere at almost atmospheric pressure, and the light exposure apparatus 945.
- this reticle manufacturing system 942 includes a blanks storage section for storing a plurality of reticle planks (substrates) for a master reticle and a working reticle, and a plurality of pre-manufactured (manufactured) reticle.
- a reticle storage section for storing the master reticle is provided.
- the master reticle in addition to the master reticle manufactured by the reticle manufacturing system 942 as described later, a reticle having an existing pattern formed on a predetermined substrate by chrome deposition or the like. Are used.
- the computer 940 transmits the information of the reticle pattern design data transmitted from the second computer 9330 and the identification indicating the divisible position.
- ⁇ is, for example, 4 times or 5 times, etc.
- a pattern different from the master reticle stored in the above-described reticle storage section (a pattern that has been created so far) (Including non-existing patterns).
- the computer 940 uses the EB exposure apparatus 944 based on the data of the created new original pattern, and uses the EB exposure apparatus 944 to apply a predetermined electron beam registry to the master reticle for the master reticle. Draw the new master pattern on different reticle planks.
- CZD 946 a plurality of reticle blanks on each of which a new original pattern has been drawn are developed by CZD 946, respectively.
- the electron beam registry is a positive type
- the area where the electron beam is not irradiated The resist pattern is left as an original pattern.
- a resist containing a dye that absorbs (or reflects) the exposure light used in the light exposure device 942 is used as the electron beam resist, so that a resist pattern is formed after the development.
- the reticle planks, on which the resist pattern is formed, are not subjected to the steps of depositing and etching a chromium film as a metal film on the reticle planks thus prepared, and the reticle planks are, for example, a master reticle (hereinafter referred to as “parent reticle” as appropriate). Also described as ").
- the light exposure apparatus 945 uses a plurality of master reticles (a new master reticle manufactured as described above and a master reticle prepared in advance) according to instructions of the computer 940.
- master reticles a new master reticle manufactured as described above and a master reticle prepared in advance
- a parking reticle used for manufacturing a circuit pattern of each layer such as a semiconductor element is manufactured.
- this working reticle Will be described further below.
- the projection optical system P is adjusted so that the state of formation of the projection image projected on the wafer W by the projection optical system PL is appropriate during maintenance or under the above-described plurality of exposure conditions serving as a reference. state is performed when such will be described first to N exposure device 9 2 2 ⁇ 9 2 2 measurement method of wavefront aberration in New. In the following description, for simplification of the description, it is assumed that the aberration of the light receiving optical system 84 in the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 is negligibly small.
- the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 is detached from the Z tilt stage 58. Therefore, when measuring the wavefront, first, an operator or a service engineer (hereinafter, appropriately referred to as “operator, etc.”) The work of attaching the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 to the side surface of the tilt stage 58 is performed. At the time of this mounting, a predetermined reference plane (here, the surface on the + Y side) is set so that the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 is set within the movement stroke of the wafer stage WST (Z tilt stage 58) during wavefront measurement. Is fixed via a port or a magnet.
- the main controller 50 moves the wafer stage driving unit so that the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 is positioned below the alignment system ALG. 5 Move the wafer stage WST through 6.
- the main controller 50 detects an alignment mark (not shown) provided on the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 by the alignment system ALG, and detects the detection result and the measured value of the laser interferometer 54 W at that time. Then, the position coordinates of the alignment mark are calculated based on the above, and the accurate position of the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 is obtained. Then, after measuring the position of the wavefront aberration measuring device 80, the main controller 50 executes the measurement of the wavefront yield as follows.
- the main controller 50 is operated by a reticle loader (not shown).
- a reticle for measurement (not shown) having a pattern formed thereon (hereinafter referred to as a “pinhole reticle”) is loaded on the reticle stage RST.
- This pinhole reticle has a reticle in which pinholes (pinholes that generate spherical waves as almost ideal point light sources) are formed at a plurality of points in an area corresponding to the above-mentioned illumination area IAR on the pattern surface. It is.
- the pinhole reticle used here is provided with a diffusing surface on the upper surface, and distributes light from the pinhole pattern over almost the entire pupil plane of the projection optical system PL, thereby making the projection optical system It is assumed that the wavefront aberration is measured over the entire pupil plane of the PL. In this embodiment, since the aperture stop 15 is provided near the pupil plane of the projection optical system PL, the wavefront aberration is measured at the pupil plane substantially defined by the aperture stop 15. Become.
- main controller 50 After loading the pinhole reticle, main controller 50 detects a reticle alignment mark formed on the pinhole reticle using the above-described reticle alignment system, and based on the detection result, determines the pinhole reticle. Position the reticle in place. As a result, the center of the pinhole reticle almost coincides with the optical axis of the projection optical system PL.
- main controller 50 gives control information TS to light source 16 to emit laser beam LB.
- the illumination light E from the illumination optical system 12 is applied to the pinhole reticle.
- light emitted from the plurality of pinholes of the pinhole reticle is condensed on the image plane via the projection optical system PL, and an image of the pinhole is formed on the image plane.
- main controller 50 sets a wavefront aberration measuring device 80 at an image forming point where an image of any pinhole on the pinhole reticle (hereinafter referred to as a pinhole of interest) is formed.
- the wafer stage WST is moved via the wafer stage drive unit 56 while monitoring the measurement value of the wafer laser interferometer 54 W so that the center of the opening 82 a is almost coincident.
- the main controller 50 is provided with a focus position detection system (60 a, Based on the detection result of 60 b), the upper surface of the cover glass 8 8 of the wavefront aberration measuring instrument 80 is made to coincide with the image plane on which the pinhole image is formed via the wafer stage drive unit 56.
- the tilt angle of wafer stage WST is also adjusted as necessary.
- the image light flux of the pinhole of interest enters the light receiving optical system 84 through the central opening of the cover glass 88, and is received by the light receiving element constituting the light receiving section 86.
- a spherical wave is generated from the pinhole of interest on the pinhole reticle, and this spherical wave constitutes the projection optical system PL and the light receiving optical system 84 of the wavefront aberration measuring device 80.
- a parallel light beam passes through the objective lens 84a, the relay lens 84b, the mirror 84c, and the collimator lens 84d, and irradiates the microlens array 84e.
- the pupil plane of the projection optical system PL is relayed to the microlens array 84 e to be divided.
- each light (divided light) is condensed on the light receiving surface of the light receiving element by each lens element of the micro lens array 84e, and an image of the pinhole is formed on the light receiving surface.
- the projection optical system PL is an ideal optical system having no wavefront aberration
- the wavefront on the pupil plane of the projection optical system PL becomes an ideal wavefront (here, a plane), and as a result, the microphone aperture lens array
- the parallel light beam incident on 84 e is a plane wave
- the wavefront is an ideal wavefront.
- a spot image (hereinafter, also referred to as “spot”) is formed at a position on the optical axis of each lens element constituting the microlens array 84 e.
- the projection optical system PL usually has wavefront aberration, the wavefront of the parallel light beam incident on the microlens array 84 e deviates from the ideal wavefront, that is, the inclination of the wavefront with respect to the ideal wavefront. Accordingly, as shown in FIG. 4B, the imaging position of each spot is shifted from the position on the optical axis of each lens element of the microlens array 84e. In this case, the displacement of each spot from the reference point (the position on the optical axis of each lens element) corresponds to the inclination of the wavefront.
- the light (light flux of the spot image) incident on each light condensing point on the light receiving element constituting the light receiving section 86 is photoelectrically converted by the light receiving element, and the photoelectric conversion signal is converted into a main control device via an electric circuit.
- Sent to 50 The main controller 50 calculates the image formation position of each spot based on the photoelectric conversion signal, and further uses the calculation result and the position data of the known reference point to determine the position shift ( ⁇ , ⁇ 7? ) Is calculated and stored in RAM. At this time, the main controller 50 is supplied with the measured value (Xi, Yi) of the laser interferometer 54 W at that time.
- the main controller 50 returns to the next pinhole image.
- the wafer stage WST is moved so that the focal point coincides with the center of the aperture 82a of the wavefront aberration measuring device 80.
- the laser beam LB is emitted from the light source 16 by the main controller 50 in the same manner as described above, and similarly, the imaging position of each spot is calculated by the main controller 50. Is done. Thereafter, the same measurement is sequentially performed at other image forming points of the pinhole image.
- the RAM of the main controller 50 stores the positional deviation data ( ⁇ ⁇ , ⁇ 77) at the imaging point of each pinhole image and the The coordinate data of the points (measured values (Xi, Yi) of the 54 W laser interferometer at the time of measurement at the imaging point of each pinhole image) are stored.
- the movable reticle blind 30B is used to illuminate only the pinhole of interest on the reticle, or at least a partial area including the pinhole of interest, with the illumination light EL. Each time, the position and size of the illumination area on the reticle may be changed.
- the main controller 50 loads the conversion program into the main memory, and stores the position shift data ( ⁇ , ⁇ 7?) At the imaging point of each pinhole image stored in the RAM and Based on the coordinate data of the image point, the principle described below is used.
- the wavefront (wavefront aberration) corresponding to the imaging point of the pinhole image that is, the first measurement point to the n-th measurement point in the field of view of the projection optical system PL, the equation (3) described later
- the coefficient of each term of the Zernike polynomials for example, the coefficient of the first term to the coefficient Z37 of the 37th term, is calculated according to the conversion program.
- the wavefront of the projection optical system PL is obtained by an operation according to the conversion program based on the above-mentioned positional deviation ( ⁇ , ⁇ 7?). That is, the displacement ( ⁇ 77) is a value that directly reflects the inclination of the wavefront with respect to the ideal wavefront, and the wavefront can be restored based on the displacement (, ⁇ ). Note that, as is clear from the physical relationship between the above-described positional deviation ( ⁇ , ⁇ ) and the wavefront, the principle of calculating the wavefront in the present embodiment is the well-known Shack-Hartmann wavefront calculation principle itself.
- the displacement ( ⁇ , ⁇ 77) corresponds to the inclination of the wavefront
- the shape of the wavefront (strictly speaking, the deviation from the reference plane (ideal wavefront)) can be obtained by integrating this. If the equation for the wavefront (the deviation of the wavefront from the reference plane) is W (x, y) and the proportionality coefficient is k, the following equations (1) and (2) hold.
- the series should be orthogonal.
- Table 1 shows fi in items 1 to 37 together with Zi.
- Each term in the Zernike polynomial corresponds to an optical aberration. Moreover, the lower-order terms (terms with smaller i) substantially correspond to Seidel aberrations.
- the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system PL can be obtained by using the Zernike polynomial.
- the calculation procedure of the conversion program is determined according to the principle described above, and the calculation processing according to the conversion program determines the wavefronts corresponding to the first to n-th measurement points in the field of view of the projection optical system PL.
- information wavefront aberration
- the coefficients of the terms of the Zernike polynomial for example the coefficient Z 3 7 of the first term of the coefficient to third full term is prompted.
- target information of an exposure apparatus to be introduced in the future for example, information on a pattern to be used, is stored as target information inside a hard disk or the like provided in the first computer 920.
- the inside of a storage device such as a hard disk provided in the second computer 930
- a storage device such as a hard disk provided in the second computer 930
- a reticle pattern design program and the like are installed, and a first database and a second database attached to the design program are stored. That is, the first database and the second database attached to the design program are recorded on an information recording medium such as a CD-ROM, and the information recording medium is a CD-ROM drive or the like provided in the second computer 930.
- the design program is installed in a storage device such as a hard disk, and the first database and the second database are copied from the drive device.
- the first database, Ru Oh in the database of the wave front aberration change table for each type of exposure apparatus 922Iota ⁇ 922 N exposure apparatus obtain Bei projection optical system, such as (a projection lens).
- the wavefront aberration change table is obtained by performing a simulation using a model substantially equivalent to the projection optical system PL, and optimizing the state of formation of the projected image of the pattern on the wafer obtained as a result of the simulation.
- wavefront data for example, Zernike polynomial 6 is a change table composed of a data group in which data indicating the relationship between the coefficients of the first to 37th items and the variation thereof are arranged in accordance with a predetermined rule.
- a total of 19 parameters are used: 0 ⁇ 5, 0 ys, the driving amount Wz, W0x, W0y in three directions of freedom of the wafer W surface (Z tilt stage 58), and the wavelength shifting amount of the illumination light EL.
- the procedure for creating the first database will be briefly described. specific First, in the simulation computer in which the optical software is installed, the design values of the projection optical system PL (numerical aperture N., coherence factor ⁇ value, wavelength of illumination light I, data of each lens, etc.) ). Next, data of an arbitrary first measurement point in the field of view of the projection optical system PL is input to the simulation computer.
- a simulation computer is used to set a predetermined first measurement point in the field of view of the projection optical system PL.
- the change of the first wavefront from the ideal wavefront for example, the change of the coefficient of each term of the Zernike polynomial (for example, the first to third terms) is calculated, and the data of the change is calculated by simulation. Is displayed on the screen of the display of the personal computer, and the amount of change is stored in the memory as a parameter PARA 1 P 1.
- a second wavefront at the first measurement point is obtained by the simulation computer.
- the amount of change in the coefficient of each of the above terms of the Zernike polynomial is calculated, the data of the amount of change is displayed on the display screen, and the amount of change is represented by the parameter PARA
- the simulation computer uses the simulation computer to calculate the third wavefront of the first measurement point.
- Data for example, the amount of change in the coefficient of each of the above terms of the Zell 2 polynomial is calculated, and the data of the amount of change is displayed on the screen of the display and the spray, and the amount of change is represented by the parameter PARA
- the computer for simulation calculates the data of the first, second, and third wavefronts at each measurement point, for example, the amount of change in the coefficient of each of the above terms of the Pell-Nike polynomial.
- the data of the change amount is displayed on the display screen and stored as parameters PARA1P2, PARA2P2, PARA3P2,..., PARA1Pn, PARA2Pn, PARA3Pn. Is stored in
- the wavefront data for example, the variation of each term of the Zurnicke polynomial is calculated, and the parameters (PARA4P1, PARA5P1, PARA6P1, ?? 'PARA1 5 P 1), parameters (PARA4 P2, PARA5 P2, PARA6 P2, &, PARA15P2),..., parameters (PARA4Pn, PARA5Pn, PARA6Pn, «) , P ARA 15 Pn) are stored in the memory.
- the input of each measurement point and the command to drive in the + direction by a unit amount in each direction of freedom are performed in the same procedure as above, and in response to this, the simulation Wavefront data for each of the 1st to nth measurement points when the wafer W is driven by a unit amount in each of the degrees of freedom, Z, 0x, and ⁇ y, using a computer, for example, changes in terms of the Zurnicke polynomial
- the parameters are calculated (PARA 16 P 1, PA RA 17 P 1, PARA 18 P 1), parameters (PARA 16 P 2, PARA 17 P 2, PARA 18 P 2), Hence, note the parameters (PARA 16 Pn, PARA 17 Pn, PARA 18 Pn) Is stored in the file.
- the simulation computer uses Wavefront data for each of the 1st to nth measurement points when the wavelength is shifted by a unit amount in the + direction, for example, the amount of change in each term of the Zell 2 polynomial is calculated, and PARA 19 P1, PARA 19 P2, PARA 19 Pn are stored in the memory.
- the adjustment parameter PARA2 is given by the following equation (7),
- the other adjustment parameters P ARA3 to P ARA 19 are represented by the following equation (8).
- PARA 1 P1 to PARA 19 Pn which are the amounts of change in the coefficients of each term of the Zernike polynomial stored in the memory in this way, are grouped for each adjustment parameter, and the nineteen adjustment parameters Sorting is performed as a wavefront aberration change table for each. That is, a wavefront aberration change table for each adjustment parameter as typically shown for the adjustment parameter PARA 1 by the following equation (9) is created and stored in the memory.
- the database composed of the wavefront aberration change table for each type of projection optical system created in this way is used as the first database as the second computer It is stored inside the hard disk of the 930.
- one wavefront aberration change table is created for projection optical systems of the same type (the same design data).
- a single wavefront aberration change table is created for each projection optical system (that is, a single exposure apparatus).
- a wavefront aberration change table may be created.
- This second database contains different exposure conditions, ie, optical conditions (exposure wavelength, numerical aperture NA of the projection optical system (maximum ⁇ . ⁇ ⁇ , ⁇ . ⁇ ., Etc. set at the time of exposure), and illumination conditions ( Illumination NA (numerical aperture NA of illumination optical system) or illumination ⁇ (coherence factor), aperture shape of illumination system aperture stop plate 24 (light intensity distribution of illumination light on the ⁇ surface of illumination optical system, ie, secondary light source Shape)), etc.), evaluation items (mask type, line width, evaluation amount, pattern information, etc.), and a plurality of exposure conditions determined based on a combination of these optical conditions and evaluation items.
- optical conditions exposure wavelength, numerical aperture NA of the projection optical system (maximum ⁇ . ⁇ ⁇ , ⁇ . ⁇ ., Etc. set at the time of exposure
- illumination conditions Illumination NA (numerical aperture NA of illumination optical system) or illumination ⁇ (coherence factor)
- aperture shape of illumination system aperture stop plate 24 light intensity distribution of illumination light on
- Zernike sensitivity table Zernike Se nsitivity
- ZS Zemike Sensitivit
- a file composed of a Zernike sensitivity table under a plurality of exposure conditions is also referred to as a “ZS file” as appropriate.
- the amount of change in each term of the Zernike polynomial is not limited to 1 ⁇ , but may be another value (for example, 0.5 ⁇ ).
- each Zernike sensitivity table shows the following 12 types of aberrations as imaging performance, namely, the X-axis direction and the ⁇ -axis direction! ⁇
- One Chillon Dis x, Dis y, 4 kinds of frame is an index value of the aberration linewidth abnormal value CM V, CM H, CMR, CML 4 is the type of field curvature CF V, CF H, CF R , C FL, and two spherical aberration der Ru SA V, contains SA H.
- the flow chart shown in FIG. 5 starts, for example, from an operator of the first computer 920 in the clean room by e-mail or the like. Designation of the exposure apparatus (unit) to be optimized and other necessary information (information on the specification of allowable values of imaging performance, information on input of constraints, information on setting weights, and information on Optimization information is also sent, including information on the specification of target values (targets) as necessary.
- the operator on the second computer 930 side issues an instruction to start processing in the second This is when inputting to the computer 930.
- the “exposure apparatus to be optimized” means, in the case of the present embodiment, as described later, in the process of designing a pattern to be formed on the reticle, each of the selected exposure apparatuses 9 2
- the adjustment of the imaging performance is performed so that the state of formation of the pattern projection image on the image plane by the projection optical system PL included in 2 is optimized. Is what we call it.
- a designation screen of the target car is displayed on the display.
- step 1 0 4 waits for Unit designation is made, Unit specified by e-mail by Li destination to the operator, for example, an exposure device 9 2 2 9 2 2 2, etc., for example, pointing a mouse or the like
- the process proceeds to step 106 to store the specified number.
- the storage of this machine is performed, for example, by storing the device No.
- step 108 the pattern correction value as correction information is cleared (set to zero), and in step 110, the imaging performance of the projection optical system for each unit described later is optimized.
- step 110 the imaging performance of the projection optical system for each unit described later is optimized.
- a counter k indicating the number of the unit to be optimized for the imaging performance of the projection optical system is initialized (k— 1
- next step 114 the process shifts to the subroutine of the k-th (here, the first) unit optimization processing.
- step 202 of FIG. Information on the exposure conditions to be optimized (hereinafter also referred to as “optimized exposure conditions” as appropriate) is acquired. Specifically, the lighting conditions (N.I.) for the type of the target pattern and the projection optical system N. that can be set in the target unit for optimal transfer of this pattern are given to the first computer 920. Inquire and obtain information on lighting N.A. or lighting, type of aperture stop, etc.).
- the first computer 9 Regarding the above information, the same target pattern information will be returned to the second computer for all target units.
- the first computer 920 is inquired about the reference ID of the target unit closest to the above-mentioned optimized exposure condition, and the N.A. And setting information such as lighting conditions (eg, lighting N.A. or lighting, aperture stop type).
- lighting conditions eg, lighting N.A. or lighting, aperture stop type
- the first computer 920 receives the single wavefront aberration of the target unit and the necessary information in the reference ID, specifically, the value of the adjustment amount (adjustment parameter) in the reference ID, the reference Acquires the wavefront aberration correction amount (or information on imaging performance) for the single wavefront aberration in the ID.
- the wavefront aberration correction amount (or information on the imaging performance) is used to estimate the wavefront aberration correction amount (or the wavefront aberration) from the imaging performance when the wavefront aberration correction amount in the reference ID is unknown. Because it can be. The estimation of the wavefront aberration correction amount from the imaging performance will be described later in detail.
- the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system alone and the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system PL after being incorporated into the exposure apparatus do not depend on any cause, but here, For the sake of simplicity, it is assumed that this correction is made for each reference ID (reference exposure condition) at the start-up of the exposure apparatus or during the manufacturing stage.
- device information such as the model name of the target machine, the exposure wavelength, and the maximum N. of the projection optical system is acquired from the first computer 920.
- a ZS file corresponding to the aforementioned optimized exposure conditions is searched from the second database.
- step 214 it is determined whether or not a ZS file corresponding to the optimized exposure condition has been found. If found, the ZS file is read into a memory such as a RAM. On the other hand, if the determination in step 2 14 is denied, that is, if the ZS file corresponding to the optimized exposure condition does not exist in the second database, the process proceeds to step 2 18 and Then, the computer 938 for the optical simulator is instructed to create a ZS file corresponding to the optimized exposure condition together with necessary information. Thereby, the computer 938 creates a ZS file corresponding to the optimized exposure condition, and the created ZS file is added to the second database.
- the ZS file corresponding to the optimized exposure condition can be created by a complementary method using a ZS database under a plurality of exposure conditions close to the optimized exposure condition.
- Step 222 of FIG. 7 a screen for designating an allowable value of the imaging performance (the above-described one or two types of aberrations) is displayed on the display, and in Step 222, whether the allowable value has been input is determined. If this determination is denied, the process proceeds to step 226 to determine whether or not a predetermined time has elapsed since the above-mentioned allowable value input screen was displayed. If the determination is negative, the process returns to step 222. On the other hand, in step 222, if the operator specifies an allowable value through a keyboard or the like, the specified allowable value of aberration is stored in a memory such as a RAM, and then the operation proceeds to step 222. Move to 6.
- the permissible value may not necessarily be used in the optimization calculation itself (in the present embodiment, the calculation of the adjustment amount of the adjustment parameter using the merit function ⁇ as described later). Necessary when evaluating the calculation result with 20 or the like. Further, in the present embodiment, this allowable value is also required for setting the weight (weight) of the imaging performance described later. In this embodiment, when the imaging performance (including the index value) can be positive or negative in nature, the allowable value defines the upper and lower limits of the allowable range of the imaging performance.
- the imaging performance has only a positive value by its nature, the upper limit of the allowable range of the imaging performance is specified (the lower limit in this case is zero). Then, when a certain period of time has elapsed, the process proceeds to step 228, and the allowable value of the unspecified aberration is read from the ZS database in the second database according to the default setting.
- the memory such as the RAM
- the specified allowable value of the aberration and the allowable value of the residual aberration read from the ZS database are associated with the identification information of the unit, for example, the unit No. Is stored.
- the area in which the allowable value is stored is hereinafter referred to as a “temporary storage area”.
- step 230 a screen for designating the constraint conditions of the adjustment parameters is displayed on the display, and in step 230, it is determined whether or not the constraint conditions have been input, and if this determination is denied, Moves to step 236 to determine whether or not a predetermined time has elapsed since the above-mentioned constraint condition designation screen was displayed. Then, when this judgment is denied, the process returns to step 232.
- step 232 if the constraints are specified by the operator via the keyboard or the like in step 232, the process proceeds to step 234, and the constraints of the specified adjustment parameters are stored in a memory such as a RAM. After memorizing, the process proceeds to step 236. That is, such a loop of step 2 32 ⁇ 2 36 or a loop of step 2 3 ⁇ 2 3 4 ⁇ 2 36 is repeated, and a predetermined time is waited until a constraint condition is specified.
- the constraint conditions are the allowable movable range of each of the movable lenses 13 i to 13 5 in the respective degrees of freedom, the allowable movable range of the Z tilt stage 58 in the three degrees of freedom, and the wavelength. It means the permissible variable range of each adjustment amount (adjustment parameter) such as the permissible shift range.
- step 2308 the process proceeds to step 238, and according to the default setting, as a constraint condition of the unspecified adjustment parameter, the value (or current value) of the above-mentioned reference ID of each adjustment parameter is set.
- the movable range is calculated based on the data, and stored in a memory such as a RAM.
- a memory such as a RAM.
- a screen for designating the weight of the imaging performance is displayed on the display.
- the weight specification screen first, the screen for specifying the I-type of the two types of imaging performance is displayed, and then in the field of view, so that the color can be specified in two steps.
- the screen for specifying the weight at each evaluation point is displayed.
- a selection button for automatic specification is also displayed.
- step 242 it is determined whether any of the imaging performance waits has been designated. If the operator designates the weight via the keyboard or the like, the process proceeds to step 244 and the weight of the specified imaging performance (aberration) is stored in a memory such as a RAM. Then, go to step 2 4 8. In this step 248, it is determined whether or not a predetermined time has elapsed since the start of the display of the above-mentioned ⁇ : r-in designation screen. If this determination is denied, the process returns to step 242.
- step 242 determines whether automatic designation has been selected. And this judgment If not, the process proceeds to step 248.
- step 250 calculates the current imaging performance based on the following equation (10).
- f is the imaging performance expressed by the following equation (11)
- Wa is the following equation (1) calculated from the single wavefront aberration acquired in step 206 and the wavefront aberration correction amount in the reference ID. 12)
- ZS is the data of the ZS file obtained by step 216 or 218 and represented by the following equation (13).
- C is data of a pattern correction value represented by the following equation (14).
- CM V , fi, 4 at the point are CM H at the i-th measurement point, fi, 5 is CM R at the i-th measurement point, fi, 6 is CM L , fi, 7 at the ⁇ -th measurement point.
- Ci, 3 is (correction value ie line width difference of the vertical line pattern) correction value of the i-th line width abnormal value CM V vertical line at the measurement point
- Ci, 4 is Abnormal line width of horizontal line at i-th measurement point
- Ci ; 5 is the upper right diagonal line at the ⁇ th measurement point (tilt angle 45 correction value of the line width abnormal value CM R of °) (i.e.
- Ci, 6 is the top left Li oblique line in ⁇ th measurement point (tilt angle 45 ° correction value of the line width abnormal value CM L) of the (i.e. the correction value of the upper left line width difference of Li slanting line pattern), respectively. Since these pattern correction values have been cleared in step 108, the initial values are all zero. That is, all elements of matrix C are initially zero.
- step 252 among the calculated 12 types of imaging performance (aberration), a large amount (deviation from the allowable range) out of the allowable range defined based on the previously specified allowable value is large.
- step 254 After increasing the imaging performance weight (greater than 1), proceed to step 254. It is to be noted that, even if this is not always the case, the imaging performance having a large amount outside the allowable range may be displayed on the screen by color coding. By doing so, it is possible for the operator to specify the weight of the imaging performance.
- the weight of the imaging performance is designated by repeating the loop of step 242 ⁇ 246 ⁇ 248 or the loop of step 42 ⁇ 244 ⁇ 248. At a certain time from the start of screen display Just wait for a while. If the automatic designation is selected during this time, the automatic designation is performed. On the other hand, if the automatic designation is not selected, and if at least one weight of the imaging performance is designated, the weight of the designated imaging performance is stored. Then, after a certain period of time has passed in this way, the flow shifts to step 253, and the weight of each unspecified imaging performance is set to 1 according to the default setting, and then the flow shifts to step 254.
- step 254 a screen for specifying the weight at the evaluation point (measurement point) in the field of view is displayed on the display, and it is determined whether or not the weight at the evaluation point has been specified in step 256. If this determination is denied, the process proceeds to step 260, where it is determined whether or not a predetermined time has elapsed since the start of the display of the screen for specifying the weight at the above-mentioned evaluation point (measurement point). to decide. If this determination is denied, the process returns to step 256.
- step 256 when the operator designates a weight for any of the evaluation points (usually, an evaluation point particularly desired to be improved is selected) via a keyboard or the like, step 2558 Then, the weight at the evaluation point is set and stored in a memory such as a RAM, and then the process proceeds to step 260.
- a weight for any of the evaluation points usually, an evaluation point particularly desired to be improved is selected
- step 256-260 by repeating the loop of step 256-260 or the loop of step 256 ⁇ 250 ⁇ 260, the weight of the evaluation point is specified as described above. Wait for a fixed time from the start of displaying the wait screen in. After the elapse of the above-mentioned fixed time, the process proceeds to step 26, and the weights at all the unspecified evaluation points are set to 1 according to the default setting. Move to 4.
- the specified value of the weight at the specified evaluation point is stored in the memory,
- step 2 64 of FIG. 9 a screen for designating a target value (target) of the imaging performance (the above-described 12 types of aberrations) at each evaluation point in the visual field is displayed on the display.
- target value target of the imaging performance
- it is necessary to specify the target of the imaging performance with respect to the above-mentioned one or two types of aberrations at 33 evaluation points (measurement points) in the field of view of the projection optical system. Therefore, it is necessary to specify 3 3 X 12 3 9 6 targets. For this reason, on the target specification screen, a setting auxiliary button is displayed together with the display part of the manual specification.
- step 266 the process waits for a target to be specified for a predetermined time (that is, determines whether or not the target has been specified), and if the target has not been specified (the determination is negative). If so, the process proceeds to step 270 to determine whether setting assistance has been designated. If this determination is denied, the flow shifts to step 272 to determine whether or not a predetermined time has elapsed since the start of the display of the target designation screen. Then, if this determination is denied, the process returns to step 2666.
- step 270 when the setting assistance is designated by pointing the setting assistance button with a mouse or the like, the process proceeds to step 276 to execute the aberration resolution method.
- each imaging performance (aberration), which is an element of the above-mentioned imaging performance f, is exponentially expanded with respect to x and y as shown in the following equation (15).
- G is a matrix of 33 rows and 17 columns (matrix) expressed by the following equation (16).
- A is a matrix having elements of the decomposition item coefficients of 17 rows and 12 columns shown in the following equation (17).
- GT is the transpose of matrix G.
- the matrix A is obtained by the least square method based on the above equation (18).
- each decomposition item coefficient after decomposition is obtained.
- a screen for designating the target value of the factor is displayed on the display together with each factor of the factorized factor after the decomposition obtained as described above. To be displayed.
- step 280 the process waits until the target values (targets) of all the decomposition factor coefficients are specified. Then, when the targets of all the decomposition coefficients are specified by the operator via a keyboard or the like, the process proceeds to step 282, and the target of the decomposition item coefficient is set as the target of the imaging performance by the following equation (20). Convert. In this case, the operator may specify a target in which only the target of the coefficient to be improved is changed, and of the remaining coefficient targets, the displayed coefficient may be specified as the target as it is.
- f t is a target of the specified imaging performance
- a ′ is a matrix having the specified decomposition item coefficient (after improvement) as an element. It is not always necessary to display on the screen each decomposition item coefficient calculated by the aberration decomposition method, and based on each calculated decomposition item coefficient, a target of a coefficient requiring improvement is automatically set. It is also possible.
- step 266 if the operator designates any imaging performance target at any evaluation point via a keyboard or the like, the determination in step 266 is affirmed, and Go to step 68, set the specified target, store it in a memory such as RAM, and then go to step 272.
- the target is specified by repeating the loop of step 26 ⁇ 27 ⁇ 27, or the loop of step 26 ⁇ 26 ⁇ 27. Wait for a certain period of time from the start of the display of the target designation screen. If the setting assistance is specified during this time, the target is specified in the flow of calculating and displaying the decomposition item coefficient and specifying the target of the decomposition item coefficient as described above. If no setting assistance is specified, if one or more imaging performance targets at one or more evaluation points are specified, the The target of the specified imaging performance at the specified evaluation point is stored. Then, after a certain period of time has passed in this way, the process proceeds to step 274 to set all the imaging performance targets at each of the unspecified evaluation points to 0 according to the default settings. Go to step 2 8 4.
- the target of the specified imaging performance at the specified evaluation point and the target of the remaining imaging performance are, for example, 3 as in the following equation (21).
- the loop from step 286 to step 290 is repeated, and the display starts from the screen for specifying the optimization field range. Wait for a certain time to specify the field range.
- the optimization field range can be specified because in a scanning exposure apparatus such as a scanning stepper as in the present embodiment, the imaging performance or the transfer of the pattern on the wafer over the entire field of view of the projection optical system. It is not always necessary to optimize the state, for example, depending on the size of the reticle or its pattern area (ie, the whole or part of the pattern area used when exposing the wafer) even if it is a stepper.
- step 2808 the process proceeds to step 288, and the specified range is stored in a memory such as a RAM. Move to 4.
- the process proceeds to step 294 without performing any particular operation.
- step 294 the current imaging performance is calculated based on the aforementioned equation (10).
- the adjustment is performed using the wavefront aberration change table for each adjustment parameter (see the above equation (9)) and the ZS (Zernike Sensitivity) file for each adjustment parameter, ie, the Ternike sensitivity table.
- ZS Zernike Sensitivity
- the calculation of this equation (2 2) is based on the wavefront aberration change table (matrix of 33 rows and 37 columns) and the ZS file (37 rows) (Matrix of 12 columns), the resulting imaging performance change table B1 is a matrix of 33 rows and 12 columns shown by the following equation (23), for example.
- the imaging performance f and its target ft are aligned (one-dimensionally).
- the term “single-column” means that these f and ft, which are 33 ⁇ 12 matrices, are converted into a 396 ⁇ 1 matrix.
- -F and ft after columnization are expressed by the following equations (24) and (25), respectively.
- the imaging performance change table for each of the nineteen adjustment parameters created in step 296 is two-dimensionalized.
- this two-dimensionalization refers to 19 types of imaging performance change tables, each of which is a matrix of 33 rows and 12 columns, and the imaging performance change of each evaluation point for one adjustment parameter. It means that they are converted into a single column, and the format is converted to 3966 rows and 19 columns.
- the imaging performance change table after the two-dimensionalization is, for example, as shown by B shown in the following equation (26).
- step 302 After converting the imaging performance change table into a two-dimensional image as described above, the process proceeds to step 302, and the change amount (adjustment amount) of the adjustment parameter is calculated without considering the above-described constraints. I do.
- d x is a matrix of 19 rows and 1 column represented by the following equation (28), using the adjustment amount of each adjustment parameter as an element.
- (F t-f) is a 396-by-1 matrix shown in the following equation (29).
- BT is the transposed matrix of the above-described imaging performance change table
- ⁇ .B is the inverse matrix of ( ⁇ ).
- the obtained adjustment amounts of the nineteen adjustment parameters are substituted into, for example, the above-mentioned equation (27) and the like, so that each element of the matrix ft-f, that is, all evaluation points 1 Difference between two types of aberration (imaging performance) with respect to the target (target value), or each element of the matrix f, that is, 1 at all evaluation points
- a memory such as a RAM
- step 306 it is determined whether or not the amount of adjustment of the nineteen adjustment parameters calculated in step 302 above violates the constraint set in advance (this determination method will be described later. explain). Then, when this judgment is affirmed, the process proceeds to step 308.
- ⁇ is a normal merit function expressed by equation (30), and ⁇ 2 is a penalty function (constraint violation amount).
- Constraint is physically (such as pressure conductive elements) 3 axes of the drive shaft, such as a movable lens 1 3i ⁇ 1 3 5 Rimitsu Bok in of determination of each of the movable range and tilt (0 x, 0 y) It is.
- tilt limit is expressed by the following formula (38d) as an example.
- the tilt limit is not limited to 40 "
- the constraint conditions include not only the movable range and the tilt limit described above, but also the wavelength shift range of the illumination light EL and the wafer (Z The movable range in the Z direction and the tilt of the tilt stage 58) may be considered. In order not to violate the constraints, the above equations (38a) to (38d) must be satisfied at the same time.
- step 302 optimization is performed without considering the constraint conditions, and the adjustment amount dX of the adjustment parameter is obtained.
- the wavelength of the illumination light does not have three degrees of freedom, but it is assumed that there are three degrees of freedom for convenience.
- step 306 it is determined whether at least one of the conditions of the above equations (38a) to (38d) is not satisfied (step 306). If this determination is denied, that is, the above equations (38a) to (38d) If 38 d) is satisfied at the same time, the process at the time of infringement of the constraint is terminated because the process at the time of infringement of the constraint is unnecessary. On the other hand, if at least one of the conditions of the above equations (38a) to (38d) is not satisfied, the process proceeds to step 308.
- the obtained moving vector k O is scaled down to find a condition and a point that violates the constraint condition first. Let that vector be k1.
- the constraint violation amount is regarded as aberration and added, and the optimization calculation is performed again.
- the imaging performance change table relating to the constraint violation amount is calculated at the point of k1.
- the movement vector k2 in FIG. 11 is obtained.
- a constraint violation amount regarded as aberrations constraint violations amount, for example, zl- zlb, z2- z2b, z3- z3b, ( ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ + ⁇ y 2) i - expressed as such 4 0 Force: This means that this constraint violation amount can be a constraint aberration.
- the constraint violation amount (z2 -z 2b) is regarded as aberration and normal optimization processing is performed. Therefore, in this case, a row for the constraint condition is added to the imaging performance change table. Restrictions are added to the imaging performance (aberration) and its target. At this time, if the weight is set large, z2 is consequently fixed to the boundary value z2b.
- the vector k2 is scaled to find the conditions and points that violate the constraints first. Then, let the vector up to that point be k3.
- constraint conditions are set sequentially (constraint conditions are added in the order that the movement vector violates the constraint conditions), and the process of re-optimizing to obtain the movement amount (adjustment amount) violates the constraint conditions. Repeat until no more.
- k1 may be simply used as a solution (answer), that is, a first-order approximation may be performed.
- k of the above equation (39) may be obtained by sequential calculation.
- the adjustment amount dX of the adjustment parameter can be obtained.
- B i is a normal imaging performance change table and does not depend on the location.
- the constraint change table B 2 , the current aberration fi, and the current constraint violation amount f 2 depend on the location, and must be newly calculated for each moving vector.
- step 304 the amount of adjustment considering the constraint condition is determined as described above, and then the process returns to step 304.
- step 306 determines whether the determination in step 306 is denied, that is, if there is no constraint violation and the constraint violation is resolved.
- step 1 16 it is determined whether or not optimization has been completed for all the units specified in step 104 described above, and if this determination is denied, step 1 After moving to 1 1 8 and incrementing the counter k by 1, The process proceeds to step 114, and the same imaging performance optimization processing as described above is performed for the k-th (here, the second) unit.
- Step 1 18 ⁇ Step 1 14 ⁇ Step 1 16 is repeated until the judgment in Step 1 16 is affirmed.
- step 104 it is assumed that three or more units are specified (selected). If two units are specified (selected), the process is performed twice, and only one unit is specified. If is specified (selected), it is of course performed only once. That is, steps 1 14 and 1 16 are performed the same number of times as the number of designated units when the counter m has the same value. Then, when the above-mentioned optimization is completed for all the designated (selected) units, the judgment in step 1 16 is affirmed, and the process proceeds to step 1 20 to determine whether all the units are well optimized. Determine whether or not.
- the judgment in this step 120 is based on the unit No. stored in the temporary storage area in the memory such as the RAM described above, the allowable value of the imaging performance (12 kinds of aberrations), and the imaging at each evaluation point. Based on the calculated value of the image performance (12 types of aberrations) and the corresponding target (target value) (or the difference between the imaging performance (12 types of aberrations) at each evaluation point and the target (target value)) For each of the units, the evaluation is performed by judging whether or not all the calculated values of the corresponding aberrations are within the allowable range defined by the allowable value of each aberration at any evaluation point.
- step 120 determines whether or not the value of the counter m is equal to or greater than M. Then, when this judgment is denied, the process proceeds to step 124. In this case, m is the initial value Since it is 1, the judgment here is denied.
- step 124 based on the result of the determination in step 120 above, the unit (NG unit) whose calculated aberration value was outside the allowable range, and the evaluation point (NG position) where the calculated aberration value was outside the allowable range ) And all types of aberration (NG items) are specified.
- step 126 the average value of the residual errors of the NG items at the NG position between the units is calculated as the above-described pattern correction value, and the pattern correction data C (the matrix of the matrix represented by the above-described equation (14)) is calculated. Set (update) the corresponding element).
- Unit A and Unit B are selected in Step 104 as Units to be optimized.
- the vertical line width abnormal value C My If only the value falls outside the allowable range, the pattern correction value is calculated as follows as an example.
- Ci, 3 - ⁇ (CMv) A'i + (CMv) B, i ⁇ Z (2) ... (42)
- (CMv) A and i are the vertical lengths at the i-th measurement point of Unit A
- the line width abnormal value, (CMv) B, i is the vertical line width abnormal value at the i-th measurement point of Unit B.
- ⁇ is the projection magnification of the exposure apparatus selected as the optimization target unit.
- step 1208 necessary information is given to the computer 938 for the optical simulator described above, and the information of the pattern acquired in the step 202 is corrected using the pattern correction value.
- An instruction is given to create a ZS file corresponding to an exposure condition that differs only in the pattern information from the optimized exposure condition whose information was acquired in step 202.
- the computer 938 creates a ZS file corresponding to the target exposure condition.
- the created ZS file is added to the second database.
- step 132 the counter m is incremented by 1, and then returns to step 112, and thereafter, until the determination in step 116 is affirmed, the process in step 114-116 is performed.
- the values set in step 126 described above are used as the pattern correction value data C by the elements Ci, 3 , Ci, Ci, 4, at least partially updated matrix data of Ci, 5 and Ci > 6 is used.
- the ZS file the ZS file created in step 128 described above is read in step 216 and used.
- step 116 determines whether the optimization of all units is good as described above. I do.
- step 120 If the determination in step 120 is denied, the process proceeds to step 122, and then the processes of steps 122 to 132 are sequentially performed. Then, the process returns to step 112, and thereafter, Steps 1 1 2 ⁇ (1 1 4—1 1 6 ⁇ 1 18 loop) ⁇ 1 20—1 22 ⁇ 1 24 ⁇ 1 26—1 28 ⁇ 1 32 loop described above are repeated.
- step 120 above determines whether the above-mentioned optimization results of all the units designated (selected) from the beginning are good, or the pattern correction in step 126. If the above-mentioned optimization results for all units have become favorable due to the update setting of the values, the process proceeds to step 138. Contrary to this, while the processing in the above loop (steps 112 to 132) is repeated M times, if the judgment in step 120 is continuously denied, in the M-th loop, the processing in step 122 is repeated. If the determination is affirmative, the flow shifts to step 134 to display on the display screen that optimization cannot be performed, and then the process is forcibly terminated.
- M times is set to, for example, 10 times.
- step 13 8 the data of the matrix C, whose elements are all zero, or the pattern correction values (pattern correction data) in which some of the elements have been updated in step 1 It is output (transmitted) and stored in memory such as RAM in association with pattern information.
- the appropriate adjustment amounts of all the specified (selected) units are transferred to the first computer 920.
- the first computer 920 receives the information, sets the exposure condition obtained by correcting the pattern information in the aforementioned optimized exposure condition using the pattern correction value as a new reference ID of each unit, and sets the new reference ID.
- the reference ID and the received information on the appropriate adjustment amount for each unit are stored in a memory such as RAM in association with each other.
- step 14 2 a screen for selecting whether to end or continue is displayed on the display. Then, when the continuation is selected in step 144, the process returns to step 102. On the other hand, when the end is selected, the series of processing of this routine ends.
- the reticle is a working reticle in which two fine vertical line patterns are uniformly distributed in the pattern area PA.
- Le R1 was assumed.
- the measurement points (evaluation points) of the above-described wavefront aberration are arranged in a matrix arrangement of three rows and one column, and each working reticle R1 has A set of two line patterns extending in the vertical direction (Y-axis direction) is formed in a matrix arrangement of 3 rows and 11 columns so as to be able to correspond to the measurement points.
- FIG. 12 is a view of the working reticle R1 as viewed from the pattern surface side.
- the line width uniformity of the pattern and the pattern position pose a problem.
- the imaging performance to be evaluated under predetermined exposure conditions includes focus dependency, left and right line width difference, and pattern center position. Find the Zernike Sensitivity table (ZS file) in advance.
- Fig. 13A shows the difference between the left and right line width (line width abnormal value of vertical line).
- Fig. 13A shows the difference between the left and right line widths at each of three measurement points (in this case, the projected positions of a pair of vertical line patterns) at substantially the same position in the non-scan direction (X-axis direction). Shows the average value of.
- such an average value is obtained because scan exposure is assumed.
- static exposure is assumed as in a stepper
- each imaging performance is obtained for each measurement point.
- the reference indicates the difference between the left and right line widths of Unit A
- the garden indicates the difference between the left and right line widths of Unit B.
- the shaded area indicates the allowable range.
- the above value (D n) A 1 Z (2 ⁇ j8) is taken as the pattern correction value (this correction value corresponds to the arrow F in Fig. 13A), and the left and right of the corresponding position are determined by the mask design tool Correct the line width difference (As a result of this correction, the pair of two line patterns located at the left end (assuming that the projection optical system is a refractive optical system) in the pattern area is the left line pattern Is narrower than the line pattern on the right side).
- the appropriate adjustment amount (and corresponding wavefront aberration) of each unit calculated in (Step 2) above is used as it is.
- Each imaging performance was calculated again in the same manner as in step 304 described above.
- the above correction value is calculated using the above equation (42) assuming that the value (D u) B of the right and left line width difference at the right end of the exposure area of Unit B within the allowable range is zero. This is substantially the same as the method of calculating with the same formula.
- Pattern projection position 5 shows the average value of the left line width difference in FIG.
- the above pattern correction value is substituted into the correction value corresponding to the line width abnormal value item at each measurement point at the right end in the exposure area, and all the remaining correction values are set to zero.
- optimization of the imaging performance of each of the units A and B (calculation of the appropriate adjustment amount, etc.) is performed, and in the process, as in step 304 described above, Was calculated.
- FIG. 13C shows the average value of the left line width difference at each of the three measurement points at almost the same position in the non-scan direction (X-axis direction). Things. From Fig. 13C, it can be seen that the value of the left and right line width difference is within the allowable range for the entire A and B units in the exposure area. Comparing FIG. 130 with FIG. 13B, it can be confirmed that better aberration performance can be obtained by optimizing the aberration again after the pattern correction. In this case as well, the focus uniformity other than the difference between the left and right line widths and the pattern displacement are good for both Unit A and Unit B.
- the wavefront aberration correction amount at the reference ID is unknown, and in this case, the wavefront aberration correction amount is determined from the imaging performance at the reference ID. Can be estimated. Hereinafter, this will be described.
- the deviation of the wavefront aberration of a single wavefront aberration and on body is a correction amount of the wavefront aberration assuming adjusting amount of shift delta chi 'and corresponds to the adjustment parameters, such as the movable lens 1 3 ⁇ to 1 3 5 above presume.
- the adjustment amount is ⁇ x
- the adjustment amount is ⁇ x '
- the ZS file is ZS
- the theoretical image is based on the reference ID.
- the performance (theoretical imaging performance when there is no deviation of the wavefront aberration of on body) is K Q
- the actual imaging performance at the reference ID (the same adjustment parameter value) is ⁇
- the wavefront aberration change table is ⁇
- the image performance change table Eta ' a single wavefront aberration W P, when the wavefront aberration correction amount shall be the AWP, following two equations (43), holds true (44).
- Ki ZS-(Wp + H-( ⁇ ⁇ + ⁇ ⁇ ')) (44)
- Equation (45) is solved by the least squares method
- the correction amount ⁇ 'of the adjustment amount can be expressed by the following equation (46).
- the wavefront aberration correction amount AW ⁇ can be expressed by the following equation (47).
- Each reference ID has this wavefront aberration correction amount AWp.
- the terminal 936 A to 936 D shown in FIG. 1 sends the second computer 930 partial design data of the working reticle to be manufactured and a part that can be divided (this embodiment).
- the identification information indicating the portion where the line width control accuracy is loose) is input via the LAN 934.
- the second computer 930 transmits the design data of one reticle pattern integrating all the partial design data and the identification information corresponding to the reticle pattern.
- the data is transmitted to the computer 940 of the reticle manufacturing system 942 via the AN936.
- the computer 940 based on the received reticle pattern design data and identification information, compares the reticle pattern with P existing pattern portions and Q sheets (P and Q are 1 or more). (Integer) and the new pattern part.
- the master reticle on which the existing pattern section is formed is stored in a reticle storage section (not shown).
- a new pattern section is a pattern of a device that has not been created before or is not formed on the master reticle in the reticle storage section.
- FIG. 12 shows an example of a method of dividing the pattern of the working reticle R1 to be manufactured (each division line is indicated by a dotted line).
- the pattern area PA surrounded by a frame-shaped light-shielding band ES on the working reticle R1 is composed of existing pattern sections S1 to S10, new pattern sections N1 to N10, And a new pattern part P 1 to P 5 is divided into 25 partial patterns.
- the existing pattern portions S 1 to S 10 are the same pattern
- the new pattern portions N 1 to N 10 are also the same pattern
- the new pattern portion P 1 To P5 are also the same pattern.
- the computer 940 uses a reticle transport mechanism (not shown) to generate a predetermined number of patterns, in which a pattern obtained by enlarging the existing pattern portions S1 to S10 is formed, in this case, one master reticle MR. Is unloaded from the existing reticle storage unit (not shown), and one master reticle is stored in the reticle library of the optical exposure apparatus 945.
- FIG. 17 shows the above master reticle MR.
- the master reticle MR is formed with an original pattern SB in which the existing pattern portions S1 to S10 are magnified Of times.
- the original pattern SB is formed by etching a light-shielding film such as a chromium (Cr) film.
- the master pattern SB of the master reticle MR is surrounded by a light-shielding band ES made of a chrome film, and alignment marks RMA and RMB are formed outside the light-shielding band ESB.
- quartz for example, synthetic quartz
- the exposure light of the light exposure device 945 is KrF excimer laser light or ArF excimer laser light.
- the exposure light is the F 2 laser beam or the like
- a quartz or the like mixed with fluorite or fluorine can be used as a substrate.
- the computer 940 expands the new pattern portion N "! ⁇ N10, P1 ⁇ P5 of Fig. 12 by the reciprocal ⁇ times (for example, 4 times or 5 times, etc.) of the projection magnification r. Create original pattern data.
- a master reticle on which the new original pattern is formed is manufactured.
- step 703 the computer 940 resets the value of the counter ⁇ indicating the order of the new pattern section to 0 ( ⁇ -0).
- an electron beam resist is applied to the ⁇ -th substrate (reticle blanks), such as fluorite or fluorine-containing quartz, taken out of the blank storage unit (not shown) by the substrate transport system in the CZD 946, This board is The carrier is conveyed from the CZD 946 to the EB exposure apparatus 944 via the interface unit 947 by the carrier system.
- reticle blanks such as fluorite or fluorine-containing quartz
- the EB exposure apparatus 944 is supplied with design data of an original pattern in which N new patterns are enlarged from the computer 9440.
- step 707 the EB exposure apparatus 944 uses the alignment mark of the substrate to position the drawing position on the substrate, and then proceeds to step 708, where Draw the nth original pattern directly on top.
- the substrate on which the original pattern has been drawn is transported by the substrate transport system to the CZD 946 via the interface section 947, where a development process is performed.
- the electron beam resist has a characteristic of absorbing exposure light (excimer laser light) used in the light exposure apparatus 945, so that the resist pattern left as it is is the original pattern as it is. Can be used as
- the n-th (first in this case) substrate after development is used as the master reticle for the n-th new pattern part by the substrate transport system via the interface part 949.
- the wafer is transported to the reticle library of the optical exposure device 945.
- FIG. 18 shows the novel master-reticles NMR 1 and NMR 2 thus manufactured, together with the master reticle MR. These masters Reticles NMR 1 and NMR 2 also have a light-shielding band formed around the original pattern.
- the substrate for the working reticle (R 1) that is, the reticle planks
- the substrate transport system based on the instructions of the computer 940. (Composed of quartz, fluorite, fluorine-containing quartz, etc.) and transported to CZD 946.
- a metal film such as a chromium film is deposited in advance, and rough alignment marks are also formed.
- this alignment mark is not always necessary.
- a photoresist which is exposed to the exposure light of the light exposure device 945 is applied to the substrate by the C / D 946 based on the instruction of the computer 940.
- step 715 the computer 940 transports the substrate to the light exposure device 945 through the interface unit 949 using the substrate transport system, and the light exposure device 945 A command is issued to the main controller of 5 to perform the stitching exposure using multiple master reticles.
- the main controller of 5 information on the positional relationship between the new pattern portion and the existing pattern portion in the pattern area PA in FIG. 12 is also supplied to the main controller.
- the main controller of the light exposure apparatus 945 aligns (pre-aligns) the substrate on the basis of the outer shape with a substrate loader system (not shown).
- the substrate is loaded on a substrate holder.
- the alignment with respect to the stage coordinate system is further performed using, for example, an alignment mark on the substrate and an alignment detection system.
- next step 717 the main controller of the light exposure device 945 resets the counter s indicating the exposure order of the new N (2 in this case) master reticle to 0, Proceed to the next step 7 19 to check whether the value of the counter n has reached N. Find out. If this determination is denied, the process proceeds to the next step 721, where the counter s is incremented by 1 (s-s + 1), and then the process proceeds to step 723.
- step 72 the main controller takes out the s-th (here, the first) master reticle from the reticle library, places it on the reticle stage, and then aligns the master reticle with the alignment mark and reticle alignment system. Then, the master reticle is aligned with the stage coordinate system, and thus the working reticle (R 1) with respect to the substrate.
- the main controller moves the wafer stage so that the exposure area on the working reticle (R1) substrate becomes the designed exposure position of the sth new master reticle. Then, scanning exposure is started to transfer the master pattern of the master reticle to a predetermined area on the substrate.
- the new master reticle is the master reticle NMR 1 having the original pattern of the new pattern portions N 1 to N 10 in FIG. 12 described above
- the working reticle (R 1) substrate In a region corresponding to the new pattern portions N1 to N10, a reduced image of r times the pattern of the master reticle is sequentially transferred by continuous exposure (see FIG. 18).
- step 725 another master reticle NMR 2 having the original pattern of the new pattern portion is placed in the area corresponding to the new pattern portions P1 to P5 on the substrate of the single reticle (R1). A 7-fold reduced image of the pattern is sequentially transferred by continuous exposure (see Fig. 18). C In this way, one-way exposure using N (two in this case) new master reticles can be performed. Upon completion, the process moves from step 7 19 to step 7 27 in FIG.
- step 731 the counter t is incremented by 1 (t—t + 1) in step 731, and then the process proceeds to step 733, where the t-th (here, the first ) Place the existing master-reticle MR on the reticle stage for alignment, and in step 735, reduce the master reticle MR pattern image to the existing pattern area on the working reticle (R 1) substrate.
- the images are transferred to the areas corresponding to S1 to S10 by the bridge exposure using the scanning exposure method (see FIG. 18).
- step 729 When the connection exposure of all the master-reticles is completed in this way, the processing shifts from step 729 to step 737.
- step 737 the substrate of the working reticle (R1) is transported to the CZD 946 of FIG. 1 for development processing.
- the developed substrate is transported to an etching section (not shown), and etching is performed using the remaining resist pattern as a mask (step 739). Further, by performing processing such as resist stripping, the production of a working reticle, for example, the first reticle R1 in FIG. 12 is completed.
- the original pattern drawn by the EB exposure apparatus 944 is coarser than the pattern of the pink reticle R1, and the pattern to be drawn is about 12 or less of the entire pattern of the peak reticle R1. Therefore, the writing time of the EB exposure device 9444 is directly applied to the entire pattern of the working reticle R1. Significantly reduced compared to drawing.
- a step corresponding to a minimum line width of about 150 to 180 nm is generally performed using a KrF excimer laser or an ArF excimer laser as a light source.
- the 'and' scan type projection exposure apparatus can be used as it is.
- the reticle design system 932 and the reticle manufacturing system 942 of the present embodiment manufacture the working reticle R1 and other single reticle as described above.
- a car A exposure apparatus 9 2 2 i in the previous experiments the car B is assumed to be exposure apparatus 9 2 2 2, above
- the pattern of the working reticle R1 is set as a target pattern, and the above-described step 104 is performed.
- these exposure apparatus 9 2 2 iota as a target of unit optimized in, by specifying (selecting) the 9 2 2 2 in step 1 3 8, the same pattern correction value and the experimental results described above were obtained, step in 1 4 0, the adjustment amount of the adjustment parameters of the corrected exposure apparatus suitable for transfer of butter over emissions of 9 2 2 9 2 2 2 are 1 b.
- the reticle pattern design data of the design data of the working reticle R1
- the pattern portion S located at the right end in FIG. 2, S4, S6, S8, S10 pattern design data is corrected based on the above pattern correction value
- Pattern data (data in which the line width difference between two line patterns in each pair located at the left end of the pattern area PA is corrected) is transmitted from the second computer 930 to the computer 940 of the reticle manufacturing system 942.
- the reticle manufacturing system 942 manufactures a master reticle having an original pattern obtained by enlarging the pattern of the pattern units S2, S4, S6, S8, and S10 as the above-described new master reticle.
- the working reticle having a pattern obtained by correcting the pattern of the working reticle R1 based on the pattern correction value can be reliably and quickly obtained. The required number will be manufactured.
- the light exposure apparatus 945 of the reticle manufacturing system 942 is a scanning stepper (scanner), but may be a static exposure type exposure apparatus (stepper, etc.). The above-mentioned joint exposure can be performed.
- the working reticle for manufacturing the device is a reticle stage.
- preparation work such as so-called baseline measurement of the reticle alignment and wafer alignment system and wafer alignment such as EG II (Enhanced Global Arrangement) are performed.
- the first computer 920 uses For the main controller 50 of each exposure apparatus 922, the new reference ID of each unit (exposure apparatus 922) and the information of the appropriate adjustment amount corresponding to the new reference ID stored in the memory such as the RAM in step 140 described above. To give.
- the main controller 50 of each exposure device 922 sets the exposure conditions according to the new reference ID based on the information, and optimizes the transfer image of the working reticle pattern as follows. I do.
- the driving amounts zi, ⁇ x l yi in the respective degrees of freedom (driving directions) of the movable lenses 1 3 1 3 2 , 1 3 3 , 1 3 4 and 1 3 5 given as information on the appropriate adjustment amount , based on the command value of Z 2, 0 X 2, ⁇ y 2 s Z 3 s 0 X 3, 3, Z "0 X4, ⁇ Y 4 s Z 5 s ⁇ ⁇ 5, ⁇ y 5, the predetermined calculation Go to drive each movable lens
- the drive command value for each of the three drive elements is calculated and given to the imaging performance correction controller 48.
- the imaging performance correction controller 4 8 the voltage applied to the actuating element for driving the movable lens 1 3 ⁇ 1 3 5 in each of the degrees of freedom is controlled. Also, the control information TS is given to the light source 16 based on the shift amount of the wavelength of the illumination light EL to adjust the center wavelength.
- the step-and-scan exposure is performed.
- the wafer W surface (Wtilt) given as an appropriate adjustment amount is provided.
- the focus of the wafer W using the aforementioned focus position detection system (60a, 60b) is determined. Ring control is performed.
- the projection for optimizing the pattern transfer state Adjustment of the imaging performance of the optical system PL can be performed in a very short time.
- the first computer 920 does not necessarily need to provide the information on the adjustment amount.
- the main controller 50 of each exposure apparatus 922 sets the optimum exposure condition based on the pattern of the working reticle and the projection optical system while the working reticle is mounted on the reticle stage RST. Adjustment of the imaging performance of the system PL is performed, but in this case, the exposure conditions for transferring the pattern of the working reticle with high accuracy and the projection optical system Can be adjusted. This is because the reticle design system has confirmed that the optimization is good, as described above.
- the adjustment unit by the light source 1 6 comprises, movable lenses 1 3 ⁇ 1 3 5 , Z tilt stage 58 Position of ⁇ , ⁇ X, ⁇ y direction (with Or the amount of change thereof), and the amount of shift of the wavelength of the illumination light from the light source 16 is the adjustment amount.
- An adjusting device is configured by each of the adjusting units, a driving element for driving the movable lens and an imaging performance correction controller 48, and a wafer stage driving unit 56 for driving the Z tilt stage 58.
- the adjusting device is not limited to this, for example, as the adjustment unit may include only the movable lens 1 3 ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 5. Even in such a case, the imaging performance (various aberrations) of the projection optical system can be adjusted.
- the second computer 9 determines the information of the pattern to be formed on the reticle (working reticle) used by a plurality of exposure apparatuses.
- 30 is LAN
- a second step of setting the correction value according to a predetermined standard based on the imaging performance steps 120, 12 As a result of the determination in the second step, until the imaging performance of the projection optical systems of all the exposure apparatuses is within the allowable range and the determination in step 120 is affirmed, repeat.
- the pattern correction value is set to a predetermined initial value, for example, zero, and a known pattern is set as a pattern to be projected, and an appropriate adjustment amount of an adjustment device when projecting the pattern is determined by a plurality of exposure apparatuses.
- the correction value of the pattern is set according to a predetermined criterion according to the imaging performance outside the allowable range.
- a pattern in which the above-mentioned known pattern is corrected by the correction value of the set pattern is set as a pattern to be projected, and an appropriate adjustment amount of the adjustment device when projecting the pattern is determined by a plurality of exposure devices. Calculation is performed for each of them, and thereafter, b., C., And d. Are repeated.
- the second computer 930 performs the above optimization in the determination step (step 1338).
- the correction value set in the processing step is determined as pattern correction information, output (transmitted) to the first computer 920, and stored in a memory such as a RAM in association with the pattern information.
- a plurality of exposure apparatuses can be used.
- the manufacture (production) of a common reticle that can be used in common can be easily realized.
- the calculation standard (setting standard) of the pattern correction value described in step 1 26 of the embodiment is merely an example.
- a value of 12 of the imaging performance outside the allowable range may be used as the pattern correction value.
- a criterion that can be set so that the imaging performance falls within the allowable range according to the imaging performance outside the allowable range may be used. .
- the second computer 930 determines whether the first step and the second step have been repeated M times (a predetermined number of times) (step 12). 2), before the image forming performance of the projection optical systems of all the exposure apparatuses is determined to be within the allowable range in the second step, if it is determined that the repetition has been performed M times, it is displayed that optimization cannot be performed. (Step 1 3 4) The process ends. This is because, for example, when the allowable range of the imaging performance is very narrow, or when the pattern correction value is not desired to be too large, the pattern correction value is set many times in the above-described optimization processing step.
- a method of handling the above-mentioned forced termination will be briefly described. For example, if the above-mentioned forced termination is performed when designing a reticle that can be shared between Unit A and Unit B, for example, a reticle optimized for Unit A and Unit B will be designed (or manufactured). ) Alternatively, newly add Unit C as a candidate for optimization, designate Unit A and Unit C, and Unit B and Unit C as units to be optimized, respectively, and process according to the flowchart in Figure 5 above. It is possible to take measures such as carrying out. In this case, a reticle that can be shared between Units A and C and a reticle that can be shared between Units B and C Capable reticles can be designed (or manufactured).
- the information of the correction value of the pattern is determined by the process according to the flowchart of FIG. 5 by the second computer 930 constituting the reticle design system, By correcting the original pattern based on the information of the determined correction value, when a projection image is formed by the projection optical system PL of a plurality of exposure apparatuses, the image is formed by any of the exposure apparatuses. Information of a pattern whose performance is within an allowable range is determined.
- the information of this pattern (or the information of the above-mentioned correction value) is given to the computer 940 for the process control of the reticle manufacturing system 942 so that the reticle manufacturing system 942 Using this information, a pattern is formed on the reticle blanks, and a working reticle that can be commonly used by multiple exposure apparatuses is easily manufactured.
- the working reticle manufactured as described above by the reticle manufacturing system 942 is the unit to be optimized among the plurality of exposure apparatuses. Is mounted on each of the exposure apparatuses designated as, and the imaging performance of the projection optical system PL included in the exposure apparatus is adjusted in accordance with the pattern of the working reticle, and is then transmitted through the working reticle and the projection optical system P. The wafer W is exposed.
- the pattern formed on the working reticle is used in the projection optical system PL by any of a plurality of (selected) exposure apparatuses (units) specified as optimization targets in the step of determining the information of the pattern.
- the imaging performance of the projection optical system PL is adjusted to match the working reticle pattern described above, so that the imaging performance is surely within the allowable range. Will be adjusted within.
- the value of the adjustment amount of the adjustment mechanism obtained at the stage of optimizing the imaging performance of each exposure apparatus for determining the pattern correction value is stored, and the value is used as it is.
- the imaging performance of the projection optical system may be adjusted, or the adjustment parameters of the imaging performance may be adjusted appropriately. May be determined again. In any case, the pattern is accurately transferred onto the wafer by the above exposure.
- the range of the exposure apparatus that can use the pattern is widened.
- focusing on a certain exposure apparatus it is possible to transfer in a better state than when using the same reticle (mask) and only optimizing the imaging performance (aberration) for each exposure apparatus.
- the range of patterns that can be shared with other exposure apparatuses can be expanded.
- the above-described pattern correction method described in Japanese Patent No. 3343939 discloses a method for correcting a line width difference of a pattern image caused by aberration of a projection optical system for each exposure apparatus.
- the working reticle could be shared by multiple units. Therefore, the reticle cost can be reduced and the unit can be operated flexibly.
- the main controller 50 of at least one of the exposure apparatuses designated as a unit to be optimized among the exposure apparatuses 9 2 2 ⁇ to 9 22 N is provided under the predetermined exposure conditions.
- the correction information this information can be obtained by inquiring the first computer
- an appropriate adjustment amount of the adjustment device under the target exposure condition in consideration of the pattern correction information is calculated, and the calculation is performed. Based on the adjusted amount Then, the adjusting device may be controlled.
- the main controller 50 forms a processing device connected to the adjustment device via a signal line.
- the imaging performance of the projection optical system is adjusted more favorably than when the pattern correction information is not considered. Accordingly, the ability to adjust the imaging performance of the projection optical system with respect to the pattern on the working reticle can be substantially improved.
- Unit A and Unit B have been taken as the units to be optimized, but the device manufacturing system 10 of the present embodiment is only used between the two exposure apparatuses. It is clear from the flowchart of FIG. 5 that the working reticle is not shared. That is, according to the device Manufacturing system 1 0 of the present embodiment, any multiple of the plurality of exposure apparatus 9 2 2 ⁇ to 9 2 2 N, working that can be used in common with a maximum N number of the exposure apparatus Reticles can be manufactured.
- the information on the single wavefront aberration obtained in step 206 of FIG. 6, the value of the adjustment amount (adjustment parameter) at the reference ID closest to the optimized exposure condition, and the value of the single wavefront aberration at the reference ID The wavefront aberration data of the projection optical system PL calculated using the wavefront aberration correction amount is used to calculate the imaging performance.
- the adjustment information of the adjustment device of each unit immediately before the optimization of the imaging performance described above, and the measured data of the imaging performance of the projection optical system For example, the measured data of the wavefront aberration measured using the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 described above may be used for calculating the imaging performance.
- the appropriate adjustment amount of the adjustment device under the optimized exposure condition or the target exposure condition is calculated based on the actually measured data of the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system actually measured immediately before the optimization.
- An accurate adjustment amount can be calculated.
- the adjustment amount calculated is based on the actual measurement value, the adjustment amount is equivalent to or higher than that calculated in the above-described embodiment.
- any data that is the basis for calculating the appropriate adjustment amount of the adjustment device under the optimized exposure condition (or the target exposure condition) together with the adjustment information of the adjustment device should be used as the actual measurement data.
- the measurement data may include the measurement data of the wavefront aberration, but is not limited thereto.
- the measurement data may include the measurement data of any imaging performance under the optimized exposure condition. . Even in such a case, it is possible to obtain the wavefront aberration by a simple calculation by using the measured data of the imaging performance and the above-mentioned Zell's two sensitivity table (ZS file).
- processing algorithm of the second computer 930 described in the above embodiment is an example, and the present invention is not limited to this.
- This modified example is characterized in that the program shown in the flowchart of FIG. 19 is adopted as a program corresponding to the processing algorithm of the second computer 930 in the above-described embodiment.
- the configuration and the like are the same as in the above embodiment.
- the flowchart of FIG. 19 is generally similar to the flowchart of FIG. 5 described above, except that the step of calculating the ZS after pattern correction (step 128) and the step of incrementing the counter m (step 122) Between steps 1 3 2) The difference is that Steps 129 and 130 are added to FIG. The difference will be described below.
- step 1 29 of Fig. 19 the appropriate adjustment amount of each unit (the adjustment amount of 19 adjustment parameters) obtained before the update of the pattern correction value in step 1 26 and the step 1 26 Using the pattern correction values (pattern correction data (matrix C described above)) of which some of the elements were updated and the ZS file updated in step 128, 1 2
- the type of aberration (imaging performance) is calculated as follows.
- each element of the matrix W a of the above-described equation (1 2) is obtained, and the matrix W a Using the ZS file updated in step 128 and the matrix C with some elements updated, the above-described equation (10) is calculated.
- the calculated 12 types of aberrations (imaging performance) at all the evaluation points of each unit are converted into the target (target value) corresponding to the above-mentioned temporary storage area in a memory such as a RAM. Is stored in association with the allowable value.
- step 130 the difference between the 12 types of aberration (imaging performance) and the corresponding target at all the evaluation points calculated in the above step 12 9 is the allowable range defined by the allowable value. It is determined whether or not the imaging performance of all the units is good by judging whether or not it is within each unit. In this case, step 130 corresponds to a second determination step, and step 120 corresponds to a first determination step. If the determination in step 130 is negative, the process returns to step 132, increments the counter m by 1, and repeats the above-described optimization processing for each unit from step 1 12 onward.
- step 130 determines whether the pattern correction data is updated in step 126. If the determination in step 130 is affirmative, the process jumps to step 1338, where ⁇ , a part of the pattern correction in which some elements are updated in step 126
- the value (pattern correction data) is output (transmitted) to the first computer 920 and RAM In which memory is stored in association with the pattern information.
- step 130 the projection optical systems PL of all the exposure apparatuses are If the imaging performance is within the allowable range, the process proceeds to step 1380 (corresponding to a decision step) without returning to the first step described above, and the correction value set at that time is applied to the pattern. It is determined and output as correction information. Therefore, after returning to the first step and calculating the appropriate adjustment amount again, after confirming that the imaging performance of the projection optical systems of all the exposure apparatuses is within the allowable range, the correction value of the pattern is determined. Compared to the above embodiment, it is possible to determine and output a pattern correction value (pattern correction information) in a shorter time.
- the ZS file corresponding to the target exposure condition in which the information of the pattern is corrected using the pattern correction value is newly calculated.
- the pattern correction value is small, it is considered that ZS hardly changes before and after the correction of the pattern, so that the above-described step 128 is not necessarily required.
- the necessity of recalculating ZS may be determined according to the magnitude of the pattern correction value.
- the evaluation mode may be specified. Specifically, it is possible to specify the evaluation method such as absolute value mode, maximum / minimum width mode (for each axis, whole). In this case, the optimization calculation itself is always performed with the absolute value of the imaging performance as the target, so the absolute value mode is set to the default setting and the maximum / minimum width mode is set to the optional mode.
- the maximum and minimum width modes can be specified.
- the maximum and minimum width modes can be specified.
- This maximum / minimum width mode is required when evaluating the calculation result. That is, by judging whether or not the width is within the allowable range, if the width is not within the allowable range, it is possible to change the calculation conditions (weight, etc.) and perform the optimization calculation again.
- a pattern composed of a plurality of sets of two line patterns is assumed as a target pattern, and at least one of the patterns has a line width difference between the two line patterns (that is, an index of coma aberration).
- the pattern correction value for correcting the line width abnormal value which is the value is calculated has been described, the present invention is not limited to this. That is, for example, when the purpose is to correct the positional deviation (positional deviation in the XY plane) of each of the two line patterns in the above pattern together with the correction of the line width difference described above,
- the calculation of the above equation (10) may be performed by using a matrix C ′ shown by the following equation (49).
- Ci ⁇ is, i-th (compensation values i.e. positional displacement amounts in the X-axis direction of the pattern) correction value in the X-axis direction Di Sutoshiyon Dis x at the measurement point, C i> 2 Is the correction value of the distortion Dis y in the Y-axis direction at the ⁇ th measurement point (that is, the correction value of the displacement amount of the pattern in the Y-axis direction).
- the above-mentioned matrix C 4 in the matrix C ′ should be used.
- a matrix in which all elements in the column are 0 may be used instead of the matrix C.
- the system configuration described in the above embodiment is an example, and the pattern determination system according to the present invention is not limited to this.
- a system configuration having a communication path including a public line 926 ′ as a part thereof may be adopted.
- the system 1000 shown in FIG. 20 includes a lithography system 912 in a semiconductor factory of a device maker (hereinafter, appropriately referred to as “manufacturer A ”) which is a user of a device manufacturing apparatus such as an exposure apparatus.
- a reticle design system 932 and a reticle design side of a mask maker (hereinafter referred to as “maker B” as appropriate) connected to the lithography system 912 via a communication path including a public line 926 ′. ⁇ Reticle manufacturing And a system 942.
- the system 100 in FIG. 20 is scheduled to be used in common by a plurality of exposure apparatuses 922 i to 922 N in response to a request from maker A by maker B, for example. It is particularly suitable for producing a working reticle.
- the lithography system 912 and the reticle manufacturing system 942 described in the above embodiment may be installed in the same clean room.
- the CZD 946 and at least one exposure device 922 are connected in-line without providing the light exposure device 945 constituting the reticle manufacturing system 942, and the exposure device 922 is connected. 2 may be used in place of the light exposure device 945 described above.
- a wafer stage WST of the exposure apparatus having a structure in which a wafer holder and a substrate holder can be exchanged is adopted.
- the present invention is not limited to this.
- at least one exposure apparatus 9 A CD-ROM that records a reticle design program and a database attached to it is loaded into the drive device 46 provided in 22.
- the reticle design program and the database attached to the reticle design program are stored in a storage device such as a hard disk from the CD-ROM drive. It may be installed and copied in 2.
- the operator of the exposure apparatus 922 performs the same operation as the operator of the second computer 930 described above, thereby allowing other exposure apparatuses that wish to share the reticle with the own apparatus.
- the working reticle that is to be shared by multiple exposure apparatuses can be reliably manufactured by sending it to a reticle (e.g., determining the pattern correction value, manufacturing the reticle, and connecting the projection optical system in the exposure apparatus).
- Programs corresponding to various processing algorithms such as optimization of image performance It may be configured to be executed by a single computer (for example, a computer that collectively manages lithographic processes), or a plurality of computers may execute a program corresponding to each processing algorithm or any combination of the processing algorithms. Each of them may be executed.
- the method of determining a pattern correction value described in the above embodiment and the modified example is an example of the pattern determining method of the present invention, and it goes without saying that the pattern determining method of the present invention is not limited to this. That is, the pattern determination method of the present invention is a pattern determination method for determining information of a pattern to be formed on a mask used in a plurality of exposure apparatuses, and wherein the pattern is determined by a projection optical system of the plurality of exposure apparatuses. Any information may be used as long as the information of the pattern is determined so that both the predetermined imaging performances at the time of forming the projection image are within the allowable range.
- a master reticle is manufactured by the EB exposure device 944, and a working reticle is manufactured by the light exposure device 945 using the master reticle.
- the reticle manufacturing system 942 is not limited to this configuration.For example, a system that manufactures a working reticle using only the EB exposure apparatus 944 without the light exposure apparatus 945 But it doesn't matter.
- the operator inputs various conditions and the like.
- the setting information of various necessary exposure conditions may be set as default setting values, and the second computer 930 may perform the above-described various processes according to the setting values. .
- various processes can be performed without the intervention of an operator.
- the display on the display screen may be performed in the same manner as described above.
- the operator creates in advance a file for setting various conditions different from the above default settings, and the setting data of this file is read by the CPU of the second computer 930 as necessary, and the The above-described various processes may be performed according to the read data.
- the second computer 930 performs various processes according to the condition setting desired by the operator, which is different from the default setting. It becomes possible.
- a wavefront aberration measuring device can be used to measure the wavefront aberration.
- a wavefront aberration measuring instrument having a shape whose entire shape is interchangeable with a wafer holder may be used as the instrument.
- the wavefront aberration measuring device carries the wafer or wafer holder onto the wafer stage WST (Z tilt stage 58) and carries out the wafer system from the wafer stage WST (Z tilt stage 58). It can be automatically transferred using a wafer loader.
- the wavefront aberration measuring device is not limited to the configurations shown in FIGS. 3, 4A and 4B, and may be arbitrary. Note that the wavefront aberration measuring instrument carried into the wafer stage does not have to include all of the above-described wavefront aberration measuring instruments 80, but only a part of the wavefront aberration measuring instrument is incorporated, and the rest is provided outside the wafer stage. It may be.
- the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 is detachable from the wafer stage, but may be permanently installed. At this time, only the end of the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 may be placed on the wafer stage, and the rest may be placed outside the wafer stage. Further, in the above embodiment, the aberration of the light receiving optical system of the wavefront aberration measuring device 80 is Although ignored, the wavefront aberration of the projection optical system may be determined in consideration of the wavefront aberration. In the case where a measurement reticle disclosed in, for example, US Pat. No. 5,978,085 is used for measurement of wavefront aberration, when a measurement pattern transferred to a resist layer on a wafer is formed.
- the displacement of the reference pattern of the latent image from the latent image may be detected by, for example, an alignment system ALG provided in the exposure apparatus.
- a photoresist may be used as a photosensitive layer on an object such as a wafer, or a magneto-optical material may be used.
- an in-line connection is made between the exposure apparatus and the co-developers, and a resist image obtained by developing an object such as a wafer onto which the aforementioned measurement pattern has been transferred, and an etching image obtained by performing an etching process. May be detected by the alignment system ALG of the exposure apparatus.
- a dedicated measurement device is provided separately from the exposure device to detect the transferred image (latent image, resist image, etc.) of the measurement pattern, and to expose the result via LAN, Internet, etc., or by wireless communication. It may be sent to the device.
- the 12 types of imaging performance are optimized.
- the type (number) of imaging performance is not limited to this, and the exposure conditions to be optimized are By changing the type, more or less imaging performance may be optimized.
- the type of imaging performance that is also included as an evaluation amount in the above-described Zernike Sensitivity may be changed.
- the coefficients of the first to n-th terms of the Zernike polynomial are used, but it is not necessary to use the coefficients in at least one of the first to n-th terms. good.
- the corresponding imaging performance may be adjusted as before.
- the corresponding adjustment of the imaging performance is performed by adjusting the position of at least one of the movable lenses 1 3 ⁇ to 1 3 5 in the direction of three degrees of freedom.
- the adjustment may be performed, but may be performed by adjusting the Z position and the inclination of the wafer W (Z tilt stage 58).
- the wavefront measuring apparatus calculates up to the 81st term of the Zernike polynomial and up to the 37th term in the case of the wavefront aberration measuring instrument, but is not limited thereto. Instead, the term is optional. For example, in each case, the 82nd term or more may be calculated. Similarly, the above-described wavefront aberration change table is not limited to those related to the first to third items. Further, in the above embodiment and the modified example, the reoptimization is performed by the least square method (Least Square Method) or the damped least square method (Damped Least Square Method).
- the ⁇ value (coherence factor) is used for the normal illumination
- the annular ratio is used for the annular illumination, but in addition to the annular ratio for the annular illumination.
- the inner and outer diameters may be used.
- the light intensity distribution of the illumination light on the pupil plane of the illumination optical system is Since the amount is increased in a part, that is, in a plurality of partial areas where the center of gravity of the light quantity is set at a position where the distance from the optical axis of the illumination optical system is substantially equal, a plurality of partial areas in the pupil plane of the illumination optical system Position information (for example, in a coordinate system whose origin is the optical axis on the pupil plane of the illumination optical system) Coordinates, etc.), the distance between a plurality of partial areas (light center of gravity) and the optical axis of the illumination optical system, and the size of the partial areas (corresponding to the ⁇ value) may be used.
- the imaging element is adjusted by moving the optical element of the projection optical system PL.
- the imaging performance adjustment mechanism is not limited to the driving mechanism of the optical element.
- changing the gas pressure between the optical elements of the projection optical system PL, moving or tilting the reticle R in the direction of the optical axis of the projection optical system, or the reticle A mechanism for changing the optical thickness of the plane-parallel plate disposed between the wafer and the wafer may be used.
- the number of degrees of freedom in the above embodiment or the modified example can be changed.
- a scanner is used as the exposure apparatus.
- the present invention is not limited to this.
- a mask and an object disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,243,195 or the like are stationary.
- An exposure apparatus of a static exposure method (a stepper or the like) that transfers a mask pattern onto an object in the above state may be used.
- a plurality of exposure apparatuses have the same configuration.
- exposure apparatuses having different wavelengths of the illumination light EL may be mixed, or exposure apparatuses having different configurations may be used.
- a static exposure type exposure apparatus such as a stepper
- a scanning exposure type exposure apparatus such as a scanner
- a part of the plurality of exposure apparatuses may be at least one of an exposure apparatus using a charged particle beam such as an electron beam or an ion beam and an exposure apparatus using X-rays or EUV light.
- an immersion type exposure apparatus that is filled with liquid between the projection optical system PL and the wafer, which is disclosed in International Publication No.
- the immersion type exposure apparatus may be a scanning exposure type using a catadioptric projection optical system or a static exposure type using a projection optical system with a projection magnification of 1.8.
- the latter immersion exposure apparatus in order to form a large pattern on a substrate, it is preferable to adopt a step-and-stick method.
- an exposure apparatus having two independently movable wafer stages may be used.
- the exposure device 922 N shown in FIG. 1 is not limited to an exposure device for manufacturing semiconductors, but may be, for example, an exposure device for liquid crystal for transferring a liquid crystal display element pattern onto a square glass plate, a plasma exposure device, or a plasma exposure device.
- a display device such as a display or an organic EL, an imaging device (such as a CCD), a thin film magnetic head, an exposure device for manufacturing a micro machine, a DNA chip, and the like may be used.
- Glass substrates or silicon are used to manufacture reticles or masks used in optical exposure equipment, EUV exposure equipment, X-ray exposure equipment, and electron beam exposure equipment, as well as microphone opening devices such as semiconductor elements.
- an exposure apparatus for transferring a circuit pattern onto a wafer or the like may be used.
- the light source of the exposure apparatus of the above embodiment, F 2 laser, A r F Ekishimare The, K r F is not limited to the ultraviolet pulse light source such as an excimer laser, a continuous light source, for example, g-line (wavelength 4 3 6 nm), It is also possible to use an ultra-high pressure mercury lamp that emits bright lines such as i-rays (wavelength 365 nm). Further, X-rays, especially EUV light, etc. may be used as the illumination light EL.
- single-wavelength laser light in the infrared or visible range oscillated from a DFB semiconductor laser or fiber laser is amplified by, for example, a fiber amplifier doped with erbium (or both erbium and ytterbium), and nonlinear optical It is also possible to use a harmonic whose wavelength has been converted to ultraviolet light using a crystal.
- the magnification of the projection optical system may be not only a reduction system but also an equal magnification or an enlargement system.
- the projection optical system is not limited to the refractive system, but may be a catadioptric system having a reflective optical element and a refractive optical element (a power dioptric system) or a reflective system using only a reflective optical element.
- the projection optical system PL When a catadioptric or reflective system is used as the projection optical system PL, the position of the reflective optical element (concave mirror, reflective mirror, etc.) is used as the movable optical element described above. Adjust the imaging performance of the projection optical system by changing the position and the like.
- the projection optical system PL may be an all-reflection system including only reflection optical elements.
- the reticle R is also of a reflection type.
- the semiconductor device includes a step of manufacturing a working reticle as described above, a step of manufacturing a wafer from a silicon material, a step of transferring a reticle pattern onto the wafer by the exposure apparatus according to the above-described embodiment, and a device assembly. It is manufactured through steps (including dicing, bonding, and package processes) and inspection steps. According to this device manufacturing method, since the exposure is performed using the exposure apparatus according to the above-described embodiment in the lithography process, the exposure is performed via the projection optical system PL whose imaging performance is adjusted according to the target pattern. The pattern of the king reticle is transferred onto the wafer, which makes it possible to transfer the fine pattern onto the wafer (sensitive object) with high overlay accuracy. Therefore, the yield of devices as final products is improved, and productivity can be improved.
- the pattern determination method and pattern determination system of the present invention, and the mask manufacturing method of the present invention are suitable for manufacturing (manufacturing) a mask that can be commonly used by a plurality of exposure apparatuses.
- the imaging performance adjusting method of the present invention is suitable for adjusting the imaging performance of a projection optical system.
- the exposure method and exposure apparatus of the present invention are suitable for transferring a pattern on a mask onto an object.
- the program and the information recording medium of the present invention are suitable for designing a mask used in a plurality of exposure apparatuses by using a computer.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Exposure And Positioning Against Photoresist Photosensitive Materials (AREA)
- Exposure Of Semiconductors, Excluding Electron Or Ion Beam Exposure (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005505973A JPWO2004099874A1 (ja) | 2003-04-16 | 2004-04-16 | パターン決定方法及びシステム、マスクの製造方法、結像性能調整方法、露光方法及び装置、並びにプログラム及び情報記録媒体 |
| US11/250,533 US20060068301A1 (en) | 2003-04-16 | 2005-10-17 | Pattern decision method and system, mask manufacturing method, image-forming performance adjusting method, exposure method and apparatus, program, and information recording medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003111072 | 2003-04-16 | ||
| JP2003-111072 | 2003-04-16 |
Related Child Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/250,533 Continuation US20060068301A1 (en) | 2003-04-16 | 2005-10-17 | Pattern decision method and system, mask manufacturing method, image-forming performance adjusting method, exposure method and apparatus, program, and information recording medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2004099874A1 true WO2004099874A1 (ja) | 2004-11-18 |
Family
ID=33432026
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2004/005481 Ceased WO2004099874A1 (ja) | 2003-04-16 | 2004-04-16 | パターン決定方法及びシステム、マスクの製造方法、結像性能調整方法、露光方法及び装置、並びにプログラム及び情報記録媒体 |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20060068301A1 (ja) |
| JP (1) | JPWO2004099874A1 (ja) |
| KR (1) | KR20050121728A (ja) |
| TW (1) | TWI234195B (ja) |
| WO (1) | WO2004099874A1 (ja) |
Cited By (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006313815A (ja) * | 2005-05-09 | 2006-11-16 | Nikon Corp | 結像性能シミュレーション方法及び装置、並びに露光方法及び装置 |
| JP2007194551A (ja) * | 2006-01-23 | 2007-08-02 | Nikon Corp | 算出方法、調整方法及び露光方法、並びに像形成状態調整システム及び露光装置 |
| KR20160064222A (ko) * | 2013-10-02 | 2016-06-07 | 칼 짜이스 에스엠티 게엠베하 | 마이크로리소그래피용 투영 노광 방법 및 투영 노광 장치 |
| WO2016098452A1 (ja) * | 2014-12-19 | 2016-06-23 | Hoya株式会社 | マスクブランク用基板、マスクブランク及びこれらの製造方法、転写用マスクの製造方法並びに半導体デバイスの製造方法 |
| JP2017003977A (ja) * | 2015-06-08 | 2017-01-05 | 旭硝子株式会社 | Euvリソグラフィ用反射型マスクブランク |
| TWI659263B (zh) * | 2017-07-27 | 2019-05-11 | 日商Hoya股份有限公司 | 光罩之檢查方法、光罩之製造方法、及光罩檢查裝置 |
| KR20220139364A (ko) * | 2020-03-31 | 2022-10-14 | 주식회사 히타치하이테크 | 하전 입자선 장치 |
| US11500299B2 (en) * | 2017-11-15 | 2022-11-15 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Exposure method and exposure apparatus |
| US12523942B2 (en) | 2017-11-15 | 2026-01-13 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Exposure method and exposure apparatus |
Families Citing this family (30)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20080038675A1 (en) * | 2004-02-20 | 2008-02-14 | Nikon Corporation | Exposure Method, Exposure Apparatus, Exposure System and Device Manufacturing Method |
| KR100639676B1 (ko) * | 2004-09-21 | 2006-10-30 | 삼성전자주식회사 | 반도체 제조용 포토리소그라피 설비 제어시스템 및 그제어방법 |
| JP4336671B2 (ja) | 2005-07-15 | 2009-09-30 | キヤノン株式会社 | 露光パラメータの決定をコンピュータに実行させるプログラム、露光パラメータを決定する決定方法、露光方法及びデバイス製造方法。 |
| WO2007086511A1 (ja) * | 2006-01-30 | 2007-08-02 | Nikon Corporation | 処理条件決定方法及び装置、表示方法及び装置、処理装置、測定装置及び露光装置、基板処理システム、並びにプログラム及び情報記録媒体 |
| US20070178389A1 (en) * | 2006-02-01 | 2007-08-02 | Yoo Chue S | Universal photomask |
| EP1906251A1 (en) * | 2006-09-26 | 2008-04-02 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | Projection exposure method and projection exposure system |
| JP4989279B2 (ja) | 2007-04-05 | 2012-08-01 | 株式会社東芝 | パラメータ値調整方法、半導体装置製造方法およびプログラム |
| JP2009164296A (ja) * | 2007-12-28 | 2009-07-23 | Canon Inc | 露光装置およびデバイス製造方法 |
| US8706442B2 (en) * | 2008-07-14 | 2014-04-22 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Alignment system, lithographic system and method |
| DE102008042356A1 (de) | 2008-09-25 | 2010-04-08 | Carl Zeiss Smt Ag | Projektionsbelichtungsanlage mit optimierter Justagemöglichkeit |
| EP2207064A1 (en) * | 2009-01-09 | 2010-07-14 | Takumi Technology Corporation | Method of selecting a set of illumination conditions of a lithographic apparatus for optimizing an integrated circuit physical layout |
| JP5570774B2 (ja) * | 2009-08-04 | 2014-08-13 | 株式会社ニューフレアテクノロジー | 荷電粒子ビーム描画装置および方法 |
| JP2013520674A (ja) | 2010-02-25 | 2013-06-06 | ノヴァ・メジャーリング・インストゥルメンツ・リミテッド | パターン化された構造を測定するための方法およびシステム |
| KR101828108B1 (ko) * | 2010-09-17 | 2018-02-09 | 니폰 컨트롤 시스템 가부시키가이샤 | 묘화방법 및 묘화장치 |
| JP5728259B2 (ja) * | 2011-03-10 | 2015-06-03 | キヤノン株式会社 | プログラム及び決定方法 |
| JP5835968B2 (ja) * | 2011-07-05 | 2015-12-24 | キヤノン株式会社 | 決定方法、プログラム及び露光方法 |
| DE102012205096B3 (de) * | 2012-03-29 | 2013-08-29 | Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh | Projektionsbelichtungsanlage mit mindestens einem Manipulator |
| NL2011276A (en) * | 2012-09-06 | 2014-03-10 | Asml Netherlands Bv | Inspection method and apparatus and lithographic processing cell. |
| TWD165428S (zh) * | 2013-07-17 | 2015-01-11 | 紐富來科技股份有限公司 | 帶電粒子束描繪裝置用腔室 |
| USD759603S1 (en) | 2013-07-17 | 2016-06-21 | Nuflare Technology, Inc. | Chamber of charged particle beam drawing apparatus |
| JP6111980B2 (ja) * | 2013-10-29 | 2017-04-12 | 株式会社安川電機 | 産業機器管理システム、産業機器管理サーバ、産業機器管理方法、プログラム、及び情報記憶媒体 |
| US9262578B2 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2016-02-16 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Method for integrated circuit manufacturing |
| CN104198164B (zh) * | 2014-09-19 | 2017-02-15 | 中国科学院光电技术研究所 | 一种基于哈特曼波前检测原理的检焦方法 |
| JP6521223B2 (ja) * | 2015-02-25 | 2019-05-29 | 株式会社ニコン | リソグラフィ装置の管理方法及び装置、並びに露光方法及びシステム |
| JP6554141B2 (ja) * | 2017-05-26 | 2019-07-31 | キヤノン株式会社 | 決定方法、露光方法、情報処理装置、プログラム及び物品の製造方法 |
| US11422472B2 (en) | 2017-12-22 | 2022-08-23 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Patterning process improvement involving optical aberration |
| JP7155681B2 (ja) * | 2018-07-10 | 2022-10-19 | ソニーグループ株式会社 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、及び、プログラム |
| TWI814668B (zh) * | 2021-12-31 | 2023-09-01 | 南韓商細美事有限公司 | 用於處理基板之設備及用於處理基板之方法 |
| JP2024065682A (ja) | 2022-10-31 | 2024-05-15 | キヤノン株式会社 | 露光方法、露光装置及び物品の製造方法 |
| JP2024065681A (ja) | 2022-10-31 | 2024-05-15 | キヤノン株式会社 | 露光方法、露光装置及び物品の製造方法 |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH0915834A (ja) * | 1995-06-29 | 1997-01-17 | Hitachi Ltd | マスクの製造方法 |
| JP2001068398A (ja) * | 1999-08-27 | 2001-03-16 | Hitachi Ltd | 半導体集積回路装置の製造方法およびマスクの製造方法 |
| JP2002025884A (ja) * | 2000-06-30 | 2002-01-25 | Toshiba Corp | 投影光学系の収差補正方法及び半導体装置の製造方法 |
| WO2002054036A1 (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-11 | Nikon Corporation | Imaging characteristics measuring method, imaging characteriatics adjusting method, exposure method and system, program and recording medium, and device producing method |
Family Cites Families (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2000089448A (ja) * | 1998-09-11 | 2000-03-31 | Fujitsu Ltd | 露光用パターン表示・検査・修正方法 |
| JP4187229B2 (ja) * | 1999-07-05 | 2008-11-26 | キヤノン株式会社 | 露光装置およびパラメータ変更方法 |
| US6803995B2 (en) * | 2001-01-17 | 2004-10-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Focus control system |
| US6433878B1 (en) * | 2001-01-29 | 2002-08-13 | Timbre Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the determination of mask rules using scatterometry |
| TWI220998B (en) * | 2001-02-13 | 2004-09-11 | Nikon Corp | Exposure method, exposure apparatus and manufacture method of the same |
| KR100877708B1 (ko) * | 2001-03-29 | 2009-01-07 | 다이니폰 인사츠 가부시키가이샤 | 패턴 형성체의 제조 방법 및 그것에 사용하는 포토마스크 |
| US6970757B1 (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2005-11-29 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Method and apparatus for updating control state variables of a process control model based on rework data |
| US6909930B2 (en) * | 2001-07-19 | 2005-06-21 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method and system for monitoring a semiconductor device manufacturing process |
| US6673638B1 (en) * | 2001-11-14 | 2004-01-06 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Method and apparatus for the production of process sensitive lithographic features |
| TWI237745B (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2005-08-11 | Sony Corp | Mask pattern correction apparatus and mask pattern correction method |
| WO2003065428A1 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2003-08-07 | Nikon Corporation | Image formation state adjustment system, exposure method, exposure apparatus, program, and information recording medium |
| AU2003211559A1 (en) * | 2002-03-01 | 2003-09-16 | Nikon Corporation | Projection optical system adjustment method, prediction method, evaluation method, adjustment method, exposure method, exposure device, program, and device manufacturing method |
| KR100475082B1 (ko) * | 2002-07-15 | 2005-03-10 | 삼성전자주식회사 | 무크롬 위상 반전 마스크의 제조방법 |
-
2004
- 2004-04-16 TW TW093110653A patent/TWI234195B/zh not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2004-04-16 KR KR1020057019512A patent/KR20050121728A/ko not_active Withdrawn
- 2004-04-16 WO PCT/JP2004/005481 patent/WO2004099874A1/ja not_active Ceased
- 2004-04-16 JP JP2005505973A patent/JPWO2004099874A1/ja active Pending
-
2005
- 2005-10-17 US US11/250,533 patent/US20060068301A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH0915834A (ja) * | 1995-06-29 | 1997-01-17 | Hitachi Ltd | マスクの製造方法 |
| JP2001068398A (ja) * | 1999-08-27 | 2001-03-16 | Hitachi Ltd | 半導体集積回路装置の製造方法およびマスクの製造方法 |
| JP2002025884A (ja) * | 2000-06-30 | 2002-01-25 | Toshiba Corp | 投影光学系の収差補正方法及び半導体装置の製造方法 |
| WO2002054036A1 (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-11 | Nikon Corporation | Imaging characteristics measuring method, imaging characteriatics adjusting method, exposure method and system, program and recording medium, and device producing method |
Cited By (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006313815A (ja) * | 2005-05-09 | 2006-11-16 | Nikon Corp | 結像性能シミュレーション方法及び装置、並びに露光方法及び装置 |
| JP2007194551A (ja) * | 2006-01-23 | 2007-08-02 | Nikon Corp | 算出方法、調整方法及び露光方法、並びに像形成状態調整システム及び露光装置 |
| KR102268034B1 (ko) * | 2013-10-02 | 2021-06-23 | 칼 짜이스 에스엠티 게엠베하 | 마이크로리소그래피용 투영 노광 방법 및 투영 노광 장치 |
| KR20160064222A (ko) * | 2013-10-02 | 2016-06-07 | 칼 짜이스 에스엠티 게엠베하 | 마이크로리소그래피용 투영 노광 방법 및 투영 노광 장치 |
| JP2016534381A (ja) * | 2013-10-02 | 2016-11-04 | カール・ツァイス・エスエムティー・ゲーエムベーハー | マイクロリソグラフィのための投影露光方法及び投影露光装置 |
| WO2016098452A1 (ja) * | 2014-12-19 | 2016-06-23 | Hoya株式会社 | マスクブランク用基板、マスクブランク及びこれらの製造方法、転写用マスクの製造方法並びに半導体デバイスの製造方法 |
| US10578961B2 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2020-03-03 | Hoya Corporation | Mask blank substrate, multi-layer reflective film coated substrate, and mask blank |
| JP6033987B1 (ja) * | 2014-12-19 | 2016-11-30 | Hoya株式会社 | マスクブランク用基板、マスクブランク及びこれらの製造方法、転写用マスクの製造方法並びに半導体デバイスの製造方法 |
| JP2017003977A (ja) * | 2015-06-08 | 2017-01-05 | 旭硝子株式会社 | Euvリソグラフィ用反射型マスクブランク |
| TWI659263B (zh) * | 2017-07-27 | 2019-05-11 | 日商Hoya股份有限公司 | 光罩之檢查方法、光罩之製造方法、及光罩檢查裝置 |
| US11500299B2 (en) * | 2017-11-15 | 2022-11-15 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Exposure method and exposure apparatus |
| US12523942B2 (en) | 2017-11-15 | 2026-01-13 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Exposure method and exposure apparatus |
| KR20220139364A (ko) * | 2020-03-31 | 2022-10-14 | 주식회사 히타치하이테크 | 하전 입자선 장치 |
| KR102768449B1 (ko) | 2020-03-31 | 2025-02-18 | 주식회사 히타치하이테크 | 하전 입자선 장치 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| KR20050121728A (ko) | 2005-12-27 |
| US20060068301A1 (en) | 2006-03-30 |
| TWI234195B (en) | 2005-06-11 |
| TW200507054A (en) | 2005-02-16 |
| JPWO2004099874A1 (ja) | 2006-07-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| WO2004099874A1 (ja) | パターン決定方法及びシステム、マスクの製造方法、結像性能調整方法、露光方法及び装置、並びにプログラム及び情報記録媒体 | |
| JP4174660B2 (ja) | 露光方法及び装置、プログラム及び情報記録媒体、並びにデバイス製造方法 | |
| JP4352458B2 (ja) | 投影光学系の調整方法、予測方法、評価方法、調整方法、露光方法及び露光装置、露光装置の製造方法、プログラム並びにデバイス製造方法 | |
| JP4415674B2 (ja) | 像形成状態調整システム、露光方法及び露光装置、並びにプログラム及び情報記録媒体 | |
| KR100894238B1 (ko) | 사양결정방법, 투영광학계의 제조방법 및 조정방법, 노광 장치 및 그의 제조방법, 그리고 컴퓨터 시스템 | |
| US20060285100A1 (en) | Exposure apparatus and exposure method, and device manufacturing method | |
| JP4436029B2 (ja) | 投影光学系の製造方法及び調整方法、露光装置及びその製造方法、デバイス製造方法、並びにコンピュータシステム | |
| JP2001237183A (ja) | マイクロリソグラフィ投影装置 | |
| JP2005327769A (ja) | 算出方法、調整方法及び露光方法、露光装置及び像形成状態調整システム、並びにプログラム及び情報記録媒体 | |
| JP2002319539A (ja) | 仕様決定方法及びコンピュータシステム | |
| JP2006245085A (ja) | 投影光学系、投影光学系の調整方法、露光装置、および露光方法 | |
| JP2003045794A (ja) | 光学特性計測方法、投影光学系の調整方法、露光方法、及び露光装置の製造方法、並びにマスク検査方法 | |
| JP2005079470A (ja) | 照明光学系の調整方法、露光装置及び方法、並びにデバイス製造方法 | |
| JP2003045795A (ja) | 光学特性計測方法、投影光学系の調整方法及び露光方法、並びに露光装置の製造方法 | |
| JP2004253673A (ja) | 予測方法、評価方法、調整方法、露光方法、デバイス製造方法、並びにプログラム | |
| JP2003031494A (ja) | 光学特性計測用マスク、光学特性計測方法、投影光学系の調整方法、及び露光装置の製造方法 | |
| HK1106064A1 (zh) | 光学照明装置、光学照明装置的调整方法、曝光装置以及曝光方法 | |
| HK1106064B (en) | Lighting optical device, regulation method for lighting optical device, exposure system, and exposure method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
| AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2005505973 Country of ref document: JP |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1020057019512 Country of ref document: KR |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 11250533 Country of ref document: US |
|
| WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1020057019512 Country of ref document: KR |
|
| WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 11250533 Country of ref document: US |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |