[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2004066242A1 - Procede et système d'apprentissage - Google Patents

Procede et système d'apprentissage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004066242A1
WO2004066242A1 PCT/EP2003/000453 EP0300453W WO2004066242A1 WO 2004066242 A1 WO2004066242 A1 WO 2004066242A1 EP 0300453 W EP0300453 W EP 0300453W WO 2004066242 A1 WO2004066242 A1 WO 2004066242A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
learning
user
specific data
information units
data
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/EP2003/000453
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Jan Hendrik Schmidt
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to AU2003303768A priority Critical patent/AU2003303768A1/en
Priority to PCT/EP2003/000453 priority patent/WO2004066242A1/fr
Priority to EP03815357A priority patent/EP1584082A1/fr
Publication of WO2004066242A1 publication Critical patent/WO2004066242A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B5/00—Electrically-operated educational appliances
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a learning method in which a learning aid is made available to a user, and a learning system for carrying out such a learning method.
  • Computer-assisted learning of a foreign language usually takes place in such a way that the learner is given predetermined ones
  • Learning materials d. H. Learning texts, exercises, vocabulary lists, etc. can be made accessible using storage media that contain these learning materials.
  • Learning technologies in which the teaching units and the tools for learning communication are supported by Internet technologies or in which the learning contents can be accessed directly from the Internet by the user are also known in recent times.
  • learning content is only possible to a very limited extent.
  • the learning contents are predefined for the user in accordance with a sequence determined by the computer-assisted learning software.
  • the learner can usually be active via the computer's communication tools, e.g. B. Mouse, keyboard or voice-controlled influence on the course of the lessons by going back or forth in the lesson. As a rule, however, the learner cannot influence the composition of the lessons.
  • the previous knowledge of the learner or his learning success has no influence on the design of the learning aids presented by the computer.
  • the learner can generally only select the most suitable learning software according to his previous knowledge.
  • prior knowledge does not exist with conventional learning software.
  • the learner also has no opportunity to edit learning content that is not part of the learning software; for example, it does not make it easier for learners to access the inexhaustible source of learning content on the Internet. If the learning software is too simple or too difficult for the learner, he has to buy new learning software that is more suitable for him.
  • the object of the invention is to provide a learner with a computer-implemented learning technology which automatically enables effective detection and evaluation of the learning success of the user.
  • the user of the learning method or the learning system is provided with a learning aid with a learning content in a data storage and / or data access device.
  • predetermined information units are stored in a table storage device.
  • the information units contained in the learning material provided are ascertained in an evaluation device connected to the data storage and / or data access device and the table device.
  • the learning material provided is then output to the user for processing on an output device connected to the data storage and / or data access device and evaluation device.
  • the active and / or passive reaction of the user to an information unit determined in the learning aid is determined via a detection device and in an analysis device connected to the detection device on the Evaluated on the basis of a predetermined spectrum of reaction options of the user.
  • the user-specific data of the specified information unit are then adapted on the basis of the evaluated reactions of the user.
  • the learning technique according to the invention of the learning success of the learner can automatically continuously on the basis of 'learning content from any computer assistance to the learner presented learning materials be reviewed and evaluated. Furthermore, the presentation of the learning materials or their selection can be automatically adapted to the learning success of the learner and thus to his knowledge needs. With the invention it is achieved that the computer-assisted learning technology adjusts itself automatically to the knowledge of the learner and thus ensures optimal learning success.
  • the computer-implemented learning technology has the following advantages for a learner: Learning contents are also made more effectively accessible to the learner from the Internet. With the invention it is also possible to use both conscious, i.e. active reactions of the learner to the learning content, e.g. in the form of a marker as well as unconscious, i.e. passive reactions of the learner to the learning content, e.g. automatically record and evaluate your learning pace. In addition, the level of knowledge and the
  • Learning success of the learner is measured and communicated to the learner. It is also possible to provide the learner with concrete learning content for further study based on his measured and determined learning success.
  • the information units specified in the table memory are correlated with learning-specific data, the evaluation unit generating an additional learning material with learning content that includes the information units determined in the learning material provided and their associated learning-specific data.
  • This additional learning material is preferably given to the user spent to support the learning effect with the subsequently presented learning material.
  • the learner has the opportunity to carry out a more effective learning process with the specially prepared information units and the associated learning-specific data before processing the learning material.
  • the additional learning means is revised on the basis of the adapted user-specific data, which are adapted to the reaction of the user to the information unit in the learning means, and is output again to the user. This automatically improves the learning process by post-processing the learning process with the additional learning material.
  • the user-specific data correlated with the information units contain data on the previous user reactions to the respective information units. This enables the current state of knowledge of the learner to be determined particularly effectively.
  • the user-specific data correlated with the information units are preferably taken from the following information: The weighting of the information unit, the
  • the automatic adaptation of the computer-assisted learning technology to the learning success or the level of knowledge of the learner is further improved in that the evaluation unit derives the learning aids from a predetermined number of learning aids are contained in the data storage device, are selected on the basis of the predetermined information units and the user-specific data correlating therewith and are made available in the data storage device. This ensures that the user always receives the learning content that enables him to achieve optimal learning success.
  • Figure 1 is a block diagram of a learning system according to the invention.
  • Figure 2 is a flowchart of a learning method according to the invention.
  • the learning system essentially consists of a control unit 1, a storage unit 2 containing the learning aids and the information units, an output unit 3 which outputs the learning aids, and an operating unit 4 for the user.
  • the storage unit 2 has a learning storage unit 21, which can be designed as a text storage or acoustic storage, and a table storage unit 22 for receiving a database.
  • the storage unit 2 and the control unit 1 can be connected to form an autonomous data processing unit.
  • the storage unit 2 can also be used as a remote storage, e.g. B. be configured as a memory on a server connected to the control unit via the Internet.
  • the learning aids with the learning contents are stored in the learning memory unit 21, which can be a text memory or an acoustic memory. Assuming that the learning goal is to learn a foreign language, the learning aids can be foreign language texts, stored in image form in a text memory or in acoustic form in an acoustic memory.
  • the stored learning content does not have to be explicitly identified or intended as learning content, but can be any content, for example, Internet pages with text freely selectable by the learner with text in a foreign language to be learned.
  • the table storage unit 22 is designed as a database in which predetermined information units are correlated with user-specific and learning-specific data. If the learning objective is to learn a foreign language, the database contains words, sentences or parts of sentences in the foreign language as information units.
  • the learning-specific data associated with the information units can then be the translation of the corresponding words, sentences or parts of sentences into the learner's mother tongue.
  • lexical and / or grammatical information can be assigned to the information units as learning-specific data. B. whether a word is a verb, the context in which a word appears, etc.
  • the learner-specific data are, in particular, data that enable the learner to achieve simple and optimal learning success in connection with the information unit.
  • the information unit can also include data on the meaning of the information unit, e.g. B. the frequency of a word in the respective foreign language.
  • each information unit in the database is assigned user-specific data in particular.
  • This user-specific data essentially characterizes the learner's reaction to the information unit presented to him and is thus a measure of his learning success or level of knowledge. There is the possibility ability to break down user-specific data for different users. Above all, information on the user's previous learning behavior in relation to the information unit is stored as user-specific data.
  • data on the following information can be used as user-specific data: the time course of the processing of learning materials that contain the respective information unit, in particular the time course of the learner's contact with the information unit; the exact course of the user reaction to the information unit presented to him in the learning materials already being processed; the frequency of the occurrence of the information unit in the learning materials already processed; a measure of the learning success of the user in connection with the information unit, e.g. B. a value that determines the level of knowledge of the learner in connection with the information unit on the basis of the time lapse of processing the learning material with the information unit and the associated user reaction.
  • the learning memory 21 with the learning aids can be designed as a read memory, on which the learning aids are previously stored, or as a write and read memory for constantly supplementing the learning aids.
  • These learning aids can e.g. B. can be entered automatically from the Internet or by the user himself.
  • the table storage 22 is on
  • Read / write memory whereby the information units and the learning-specific data can be pre-stored or can also be supplemented by the user or automatically.
  • the user-specific data is continuously supplemented on the basis of the learner's previous learning process.
  • the memory 2 with the learning memory unit 21 and the table memory unit 22 is connected to the control unit 1, which has an evaluation unit 11, an analysis unit 12 and a data adaptation unit 13.
  • the evaluation unit 11 is used to retrieve a learning material with a learning content from the read memory 21 and on the basis of the to determine which information units stored in the table memory 22 are contained in the learning aid. In the case of foreign language learning based on texts in foreign languages as an example, this would be the determination contained in the learning unit, either words, parts of sentences or sentences already known by the user or still to be learned, for example using a parser.
  • the information units in the learning aid can be marked by the evaluation unit.
  • the evaluation unit 11 generates an additional learning aid correlated with the learner's level of knowledge with information units contained in the learning aid and the associated learning-specific data.
  • this can be a vocabulary list and its equivalent in the learner's mother tongue.
  • the evaluation unit 11 is connected to the output unit 3 in order to present the learning material and possibly the additional learning material to a user.
  • the output unit 3 can have an acoustic output unit 31 and / or an optical output unit 32.
  • the acoustic output unit 31 can be a headphone or a loudspeaker.
  • the optical output unit 32 can be a screen of a computer or a television.
  • the control unit 1 is also connected to the control unit 4.
  • This can be a keyboard, a mouse, a microphone, or also another operating unit with which an active and / or passive reaction of the user to the learning material output with the aid of the output unit 3 is recorded.
  • the control unit 4 is connected to the analysis unit 12 in the control unit 1, which evaluates the user's reaction to an information unit relating to the learning aid output on the output unit on the basis of a predetermined and stored spectrum of reaction options. Assuming that the control unit is a keyboard or a mouse, if the User z. B. controls a marked information unit in the learning aid with the keyboard or mouse, this reaction is evaluated as an indication that he does not know the information unit or its learning-specific content.
  • the analysis unit 12 can evaluate this as the recognition of the information unit or its learning-specific content by the user.
  • the analysis unit 12 specifies a specific spectrum of reaction options for the user when processing the learning aid. Different spectra of reaction options for different output and operating units can also be specified.
  • the learner's reaction to a text is recorded with the aid of a device that measures the learner's eye movements on the computer screen, the learner's understanding can be evaluated, for example, by registering which words the learner's eye is on for longer than average lingers.
  • the user can also specify the range of reaction options himself.
  • the analysis unit 12 of the control unit 1 is also connected to the data adaptation unit 13, which adapts the corresponding user-specific data of the information unit, which are stored in the table memory 22, on the basis of the evaluated user reactions in connection with an information unit.
  • the data adaptation unit 13 is furthermore preferably connected to the evaluation unit 11 in order to revise the additional learning means generated by the evaluation unit 11 with the associated learning-specific data on the basis of the adapted user-specific data and thus to adapt them to the current status of the learning success of the learner.
  • This revised additional learning aid can then be output by the evaluation unit 11 again to the learner via the output unit 3 in order to enable the learner to postprocess the learning unit and thus to further improve the learning success.
  • the evaluation unit 11 can also be designed such that it selects a learning medium presented to the learner from a predetermined number of learning mediums from the learning memory unit 21 on the basis of the predetermined information units stored in the table memory 22 and the user-specific data correlated therewith. This procedure enables the learner to automatically provide a lesson that is optimally adapted to their level of knowledge and which guarantees maximum learning success. Furthermore, it is also preferred that the analysis unit 12 is designed in such a way that with the help of an evaluation scheme on the basis of the user-specific data correlated with the information units, a measure of the level of knowledge and thus the learning success of the user is determined and via the output unit 3 the user is brought to the notice.
  • a flowchart of the learning method according to the invention which runs automatically on the learning system shown in FIG. 1, is explained with reference to FIG. 2 using the example of learning a foreign language.
  • the learning method according to the invention can, however, for any learning content, such as. B. to learn grammatical problems or also see mathematical or technical information.
  • step a) a learning material to be presented to the learner, in the example shown a foreign language text, is provided. This takes place in the control unit 1, the text being selected from the foreign language texts stored in the learning storage unit 21.
  • the text selection can be selected on the basis of the information units stored in the table memory 22 with the user-specific data, that is to say on the basis of the learner's level of knowledge reproduced in these data.
  • the learning aid can also come from a further data source, for example the Internet, or be made available by the user himself.
  • the selected text is then analyzed in step b) by the evaluation unit 11 of the control unit 1 on the basis of the information units stored in the table memory 22 and their user-specific data, the information units being vocabulary in foreign languages, the user-specific data of which reflect the respective level of knowledge of the learner.
  • the evaluation unit 11 examines the selected foreign language text and identifies the foreign language vocabulary contained therein, e.g. with the help of a parser that assigns the corresponding vocabulary (such as listed in a dictionary) to the grammatical word forms (e.g. with endings) that appear in the text.
  • the evaluation unit creates a vocabulary list with these foreign language vocabulary depending on the learner's level of knowledge ascertained with the aid of the invention, and the table-specific memory 22 also lists the learning-specific data correlated with the vocabulary, i.e. the correspondence of the foreign language vocabulary in the learner's mother tongue.
  • This vocabulary list is given to the learner so that he can prepare for the foreign language text to be read.
  • the foreign language text is then output to the learner in step c), with the learner using the operating device 4 marks the vocabulary in the foreign language text that it does not know.
  • These markings or non-markings are then evaluated in step d) by the analysis unit 12 in the control unit 1, the data adaptation unit 13 adapting the user-specific data to the vocabulary accordingly.
  • the evaluation unit 11 can again present the learner with a vocabulary list with the vocabulary unknown to him in the processed foreign language text and its translation.
  • level of knowledge in the age of a native speaker
  • Degree of mastery of a vocabulary Degree of mastery before the last encounter + beta (reaction of the user to the last encounter, degree of difficulty of the vocabulary)
  • Degree of mastery of a vocabulary Degree of mastery after the last encounter * exp (- Time after the last encounter * alpha * Degree of difficulty of the vocabulary)
  • the analysis unit 12 can also provide the evaluation unit 11 with the next learning aid which is optimally adapted to the current state of knowledge of the learner.
  • the analysis unit 12 on the Based on the assessment, the user-specific data of other learners who use the learning process in parallel is adjusted in order to automatically enable all learners to achieve an optimal learning strategy and an optimal selection of learning materials.
  • the learning system according to the invention and the learning method according to the invention, it is possible to automatically adapt a computer-implemented learning technique optimally to the knowledge level and learning success of a learner with the aid of a simple information selection and processing strategy.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)

Abstract

Selon l'invention, dans une technique d'apprentissage par informatique, un moyen d'apprentissage comprenant un contenu d'apprentissage dans un dispositif de stockage de données est mis à la disposition d'un utilisateur. De plus, des unités d'informations prédéterminées sont enregistrées dans un dispositif de stockage sous forme de tableau, ces dernières étant en corrélation avec des données spécifiques à l'utilisateur. Les unités d'informations, contenues dans le moyen d'apprentissage mis à disposition, sont vérifiées dans un dispositif d'évaluation relié au dispositif de stockage de données et/ou à un dispositif d'accès aux données et au dispositif sous forme de tableau. Enfin, les moyens d'apprentissage mis à disposition sont affichés pour l'utilisateur sur un dispositif de sortie, relié au dispositif de stockage de données et/ou à un dispositif d'accès aux données et au dispositif d'évaluation. La réaction active et/ou passive de l'utilisateur par rapport à une unité d'informations déterminée dans les moyens d'apprentissage est évaluée à l'aide d'un dispositif de détection et elle est interprétée dans un dispositif d'analyse relié au dispositif de détection sur la base d'un spectre prédéterminé, concernant les possibilités de réaction de l'utilisateur. Les données spécifiques à l'utilisateur sont harmonisées avec l'unité d'informations prédéterminée, sur la base des réactions interprétées de l'utilisateur.
PCT/EP2003/000453 2003-01-17 2003-01-17 Procede et système d'apprentissage Ceased WO2004066242A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2003303768A AU2003303768A1 (en) 2003-01-17 2003-01-17 Learning method and learning system
PCT/EP2003/000453 WO2004066242A1 (fr) 2003-01-17 2003-01-17 Procede et système d'apprentissage
EP03815357A EP1584082A1 (fr) 2003-01-17 2003-01-17 Procede et systeme d'apprentissage

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2003/000453 WO2004066242A1 (fr) 2003-01-17 2003-01-17 Procede et système d'apprentissage

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004066242A1 true WO2004066242A1 (fr) 2004-08-05

Family

ID=32748739

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2003/000453 Ceased WO2004066242A1 (fr) 2003-01-17 2003-01-17 Procede et système d'apprentissage

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1584082A1 (fr)
AU (1) AU2003303768A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2004066242A1 (fr)

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996007999A1 (fr) * 1994-09-05 1996-03-14 Ellen Rubin Lebowitz Systeme d'enseignement de la lecture
US5822720A (en) * 1994-02-16 1998-10-13 Sentius Corporation System amd method for linking streams of multimedia data for reference material for display
WO2000042589A2 (fr) * 1998-09-04 2000-07-20 N.V. De Wilde Cbt Systeme et procede de generation d'exercices de langue personnalises
US6254395B1 (en) * 1998-04-13 2001-07-03 Educational Testing Service System and method for automated testing of writing skill
EP1168277A1 (fr) * 2000-06-22 2002-01-02 Hao Ming Yeh Système de communication mobile pour l'apprentissage du vocabulaire étranger
US20020098468A1 (en) * 2001-01-23 2002-07-25 Avatar Technology, Inc. Method for constructing and teaching a curriculum
US20020168621A1 (en) * 1996-05-22 2002-11-14 Cook Donald A. Agent based instruction system and method

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5822720A (en) * 1994-02-16 1998-10-13 Sentius Corporation System amd method for linking streams of multimedia data for reference material for display
WO1996007999A1 (fr) * 1994-09-05 1996-03-14 Ellen Rubin Lebowitz Systeme d'enseignement de la lecture
US20020168621A1 (en) * 1996-05-22 2002-11-14 Cook Donald A. Agent based instruction system and method
US6254395B1 (en) * 1998-04-13 2001-07-03 Educational Testing Service System and method for automated testing of writing skill
WO2000042589A2 (fr) * 1998-09-04 2000-07-20 N.V. De Wilde Cbt Systeme et procede de generation d'exercices de langue personnalises
EP1168277A1 (fr) * 2000-06-22 2002-01-02 Hao Ming Yeh Système de communication mobile pour l'apprentissage du vocabulaire étranger
US20020098468A1 (en) * 2001-01-23 2002-07-25 Avatar Technology, Inc. Method for constructing and teaching a curriculum

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BREIDT E ET AL: "ACCESSING FOREIGN LANGUAGES WITH COMPASS", MACHINE TRANSLATION, KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS, DORDRECHT, NL, vol. 12, no. 1/2, 1997, pages 153 - 174, XP001057381, ISSN: 0922-6567 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2003303768A1 (en) 2004-08-13
EP1584082A1 (fr) 2005-10-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE69622439T2 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur ermittlung von kombinierten informationen aus sprachsignalen für adaptive interaktion in unterricht und prüfung
US7818164B2 (en) Method and system for teaching a foreign language
De Bot et al. Second language acquisition: An advanced resource book
Carlsen Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers' classrooms
DE69828141T2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Spracherkennung
DE10306599B4 (de) Benutzeroberfläche, System und Verfahren zur automatischen Benennung von phonischen Symbolen für Sprachsignale zum Korrigieren von Aussprache
DE202025101195U1 (de) Virtual-Reality-System zur Förderung des Leseverständnisses und des Schreibens bei Schülern
Madill et al. Classifying and identifying motor learning behaviors in voice-therapy clinician-client interactions: a proposed motor learning classification framework
Heift Intelligent language tutoring systems for grammar practice
Mak et al. Examining the impact of the ABRACADABRA (ABRA) web-based literacy program on primary school students in Hong Kong
DE69911054T2 (de) Trainingsgerät und -verfahren mit einem simulator der menschlichen interaktion
Breuer Revision processes in first language and foreign language writing: Differences and similarities in the success of revision processes
Hosseini et al. Replacing paper-based testing with an alternative for the assessment of Iranian undergraduate students: Administration mode effect on testing performance
DE69527691T2 (de) Sprachinformationsverarbeitungssystem und -verfahren zum Bereitstellen benutzerangeforderter Sprachkenntnisse
Gleeson et al. Should teachers of writing write themselves? An Australian contribution to the debate
Mioduser et al. Using computers to teach remedial spelling to a student with low vision: A case study
EP1584082A1 (fr) Procede et systeme d'apprentissage
EP1003142A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance automatique de la réalisation de buts instructifs par un ordinateur
Chien et al. The Relationship between Perceived Listening Strategies, Listening Skills, and Reading Skills among EFL University Students in Taiwan.
MAY et al. AI TUTORS FOR ORAL PRESENTATION SKILLS: A CASE STUDY OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’READINESS, PERCEPTIONS, AND ANXIETY
Rheinberg Teachers reference-norm orientation and student motivation for learning
Aziz Extraversion-introversion and the oral performance of Koya University EFL Students
Atif et al. Exploring Speaking English Anxiety among KUST Students: Causes and Interventions
EP1003143A1 (fr) Procédé pour la sélection automatique de matières et la réalisation d'un cours de formation par un ordinateur
Blasco 9 A Two-Year Longitudinal Study of Three EFL Young Learners’ Oral Output: The Development of Syntactic Complexity and Accuracy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003815357

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2003815357

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 2003815357

Country of ref document: EP