[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2000072013A1 - Construction de bibliotheque de troncation - Google Patents

Construction de bibliotheque de troncation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000072013A1
WO2000072013A1 PCT/US2000/013813 US0013813W WO0072013A1 WO 2000072013 A1 WO2000072013 A1 WO 2000072013A1 US 0013813 W US0013813 W US 0013813W WO 0072013 A1 WO0072013 A1 WO 0072013A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
gene
genes
truncated
hbrary
dna
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2000/013813
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Stephen J. Benkovic
Marc Ostermeier
Andrew E. Nixon
Stefan A. Lutz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Penn State Research Foundation
Original Assignee
Penn State Research Foundation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Penn State Research Foundation filed Critical Penn State Research Foundation
Priority to AU50309/00A priority Critical patent/AU5030900A/en
Publication of WO2000072013A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000072013A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/10Processes for the isolation, preparation or purification of DNA or RNA
    • C12N15/102Mutagenizing nucleic acids
    • C12N15/1027Mutagenizing nucleic acids by DNA shuffling, e.g. RSR, STEP, RPR
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/10Processes for the isolation, preparation or purification of DNA or RNA
    • C12N15/102Mutagenizing nucleic acids

Definitions

  • the present invention is generally directed towards construction of incremental truncation libraries for the creation of hybrid proteins.
  • the present invention provides benefits over previous techniques which required a degree of sequence similarity for the generation of such libraries.
  • Protein mutagenesis has long been used as a tool for structure/function studies of proteins. With the advent of modern DNA manipulation techniques and advancements in protein structure determination, large numbers of protein sequences and structures are available which can be sorted into groups or superfamilies based on structural similarity. Such groupings demonstrate that proteins that are structurally similar often catalyze similar reactions and have active sites with shared amino acids. Further, this facilitates identification of side chain residues that are important in binding and catalysis, and allows for their modification so as to yield proteins with altered properties.
  • directed evolution strategies incorporate some method of introducing random mutations into a gene followed by screening or selection for a desired property. The cycle is then repeated several times until the desired property is achieved or until further cycling produces no improvement in the desired property.
  • Early methodologies utilized point mutations generated by error-prone PCR, chemical mutagenesis or mutator strains of E. coli. This type of approach is something akin to an asexual evolutionary process with non-beneficial and beneficial mutations becoming fixed. Such strategies have been particularly successful in achieving improvements in thermostability, altering substrate specificity, and improving activity in organic solvents.
  • directed evolution is a stepwise process, only relatively small steps in sequence space can occur. Thus, the utility of current directed evolution methodologies to evolve novel catalytic sites, which presumably require large excursions in sequence space, is limited.
  • novel approaches as described herein are a combinatorial solution to the fundamental questions "where can proteins or protein fragments be fused to produce active hybrids?" and "where are the points at which a protein can be bisected and retain or exhibit desired properties?"
  • one aspect of the invention involves various methods that circumvent homology limitations of methods of DNA recombination by allowing genes to be shuffled independent of their sequence homology.
  • embodiments of the present invention are also useful for creating hybrid proteins from genes with high levels of sequence homology. The present invention, since it is independent of DNA sequence homology, will be applicable to potentially any desired gene, gene fragment, or gene library for the creation of hybrid proteins.
  • One embodiment of the current invention is directed to a DNA library comprised of a recombinant plasmid incorporating a parent gene and a second recombinant plasmid incorporating a modified gene. It is preferable that a modified gene in the DNA library have an increment of truncation on the order of about 1 to about 500 nucleotides, but preferably less than 250 nucleotides, even more preferably less than 100 nucleotides, yet even more preferably less than 50 nucleotides, and most preferably the increment of truncation of the modified gene is 1 nucleotide.
  • the second recombinant plasmid includes a plurality of other recombinant plasmids.
  • These other recombinant plasmids each include truncated versions of the parent gene.
  • the parent gene can be selected from the group consisting of a gene of interest, a portion of a gene of interest, a gene fragment, a PCR product, and/or a mutant of said gene of interest. It is preferable that the modified gene be formed by incremental truncation of the parent gene under conditions suitable to ensure reduction of base pairs at a predetermined rate. It is preferable that this predetermined rate be less than about 50 base pairs per minute and even more preferably less than about 10 base pairs per minute.
  • Another method of the present invention is a method of protein identification which includes the steps of isolating a parent gene of interest; truncating that parent gene of interest in a progressive and controlled manner to form a truncated gene; and expressing a protein corresponding to that truncated gene.
  • the expressed protein is selected based upon the presence or absence of a predetermined characteristic.
  • selecting looks for a predetermined characteristic which can be, for example, antiobiotic resistance or growth on an auxotrophic host.
  • screening refers to the ability of the resulting expressed protein to exhibit a predetermined activity such as a therapeutic activity or a certain functionality.
  • the reduction of nucleotides occur in a progressive and controlled manner, that is, to ensure that relatively small groups of nucleotides are removed during the truncation process.
  • the removal of the number of nucleotides is on a case-by-case basis, but preferably in a range of 1-500 nucleotides, more preferably less than 250 nucleotides, even more preferably less than 100 nucleotides, more preferably less than 50 nucleotides, even more preferably less than 10 nucleotides, and most preferably a nucleotide at a time (i.e., 1 nucleotide).
  • nucleotides are removed from the parent gene that achieves the controlled reduction of the nucleotides as described above. It is best that the conditions be controlled as described herein to ensure that a removal rate of less than 10 base pairs per minute of nucleotides is achieved.
  • a variety of truncated genes may be used to form a library of proteins which originate from a plurahty of differentially modified parent genes.
  • each member of the library of proteins possess the predetermined characteristic.
  • the parent gene may be originally derived from the gene of interest, a portion of the gene of interest, a gene fragment, a PCR product and/or a mutant of said gene of interest.
  • the libraries are preferably screened or assayed to look for desired activity.
  • Yet another embodiment of the present invention is a method of producing a protein which comprises isolating a first and a second parent gene; truncating said first and second parent genes in a controlled manner to form a first and a second truncated gene and joining the first and second truncated genes to form a combined truncated gene.
  • the first and second parent genes by be chosen independent of homology.
  • independent of homology is meant to connote that the selection process is not dependent on homology between genes. That is, the process will work whether or not a substantial degree of homology exists.
  • homologous genes may also be employed and this is not excluded by the phrase independent of homology.
  • the step of joining may include the step of fusing and/or ligating as described herein.
  • the truncation should be done in a controlled manner which may be either time and/or temperature dependent.
  • Another embodiment includes a method of creating a library of DNA which comprises of initiation a controlled truncation of a parent a gene periodically removing ahquots during the truncation so as to isolate incrementally truncated versions of said parent gene thereby creating a library of truncated DNA.
  • Other embodiments described herein do not require the periodic removal of ahquots during the truncation.
  • the DNA construct is usually in the form of a recombinant plasmid and may include any of the original or source recombinant plasmids which may include a functional genetic element which is used to facilitate fusion of the first and second parent genes.
  • This library preferably includes a plurahty of different combined truncated genes which may be used later to express proteins having different characteristics.
  • the library of randomly combined truncated genes is used to express proteins which may have a predetermined characteristic or activity. Therefore, the proteins that are produced by the randomly combined truncated genes can be selected and/or screened to determine the presence or absence of a predetermined characteristic or activity. It is a preferable aspect of the present embodiment that the selected proteins are screened for activity as well as for the predetermined characteristic.
  • the randomly combined truncated genes or the hbrary of randomly combined truncated genes may be used to produce a hbrary of proteins which then may be randomly combined to produce a hbrary of proteins which may similarly be screened and/or characterized.
  • An important aspect of the present invention is that the proteins that are formed are designed to incorporate inteins or other cleavage producing portions of a protein. These cleavage sites allow the protein itself to be sphced and recombined to form proteins which may have a suitable activity.
  • Another aspect of the present invention is a method of producing proteins which includes isolating a first gene and a second gene; truncating the first and second genes in a controlled fashion; ligating the truncated first and second genes to form a recombinant plasmid; and expressing the protein which corresponds to the recombinant plasmid.
  • the protein that is expressed include an intein and/or dimerization domain as a result of inclusion of the appropriate coding sequence in the recombinant plasmid or through post-translational modification of the protein after its expression by the recombinant plasmid.
  • a desired characteristic or desired functionality may include any of the following traits: the absence of a characteristic, function or property ; a known and/or unknown function; an increase or a decrease in activity and novel or unexpected activities.
  • Figure 1 schematically demonstrates the creation of an incremental truncation library.
  • Figure 2 schematically demonstrates the creation of a seamless ITCHY library.
  • Figure 3 schematically demonstrates the creation of a SCRATCHY library (created by shuffling two ITCHY libraries).
  • Figure 4 is a depiction of a parental incremental truncation plasmid and construction of an incremental truncation library using nucleotide analogs.
  • Figures 5A-5G show the construction of ITCHY hbraries between two individual genes or gene fragments located on a single plasmid by simultaneous incremental truncation using nucleotide analogs by a method called THIO-ITCHY.
  • Figure 6 is an illustration of the CP-ITCHY principle.
  • Figure 7 shows the creation of CP-ITCHY libraries.
  • Fig. 7a is a description of a vector (pDIM-N5) for creating CP-ITCHY libraries;
  • Fig. 7b is an example of a CP insert and construction of a CP-ITCHY hbrary.
  • the present invention relates generally to a combinatorial methodology for creating hbraries of hybrid proteins independent of DNA homology.
  • This invention allows for creating hbraries of fusions at regions of homology and non-homology including regions such that internal "deletions” and/or “duphcations" (from the aligned sequences or structures) are created.
  • Embodiments of the present invention may be used to create such hybrid protein hbraries.
  • the present invention may also involve a series of combinatorial approaches that utilize the incremental truncation of genes, gene fragments or gene hbraries.
  • an exonuclease such as Exo III
  • an exonuclease can be used to create a hbrary of all possible single base-pair deletions of a given piece of DNA.
  • Incremental truncation libraries have applications in protein engineering as well as protein folding, enzyme evolution, and the chemical synthesis of proteins.
  • the invention provides a methodology of DNA recombination which is independent of DNA sequence homology.
  • the present invention allows the construction of a hbrary containing all possible truncations of a gene, gene fragment or DNA hbrary in a single experiment as depicted in Fig. 1.
  • Many of the techniques involved in the present invention make use of recombinant DNA technology, using DNA cloning vehicles and other tools of genetic engineering in the process of making the hbraries of the present invention. Many of these basic techniques are described in Maniatis, Fritsch and Sambrook in Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1982, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
  • incremental truncation by the process of slow, directional, controlled digestion of DNA is utilized for the creation of novel fusion proteins. For example, during this digestion, small aliquots are frequently removed and the digestion quenched. Thus by taking multiple samples over a given time period a hbrary of all possible single base-pair deletions of a given piece of DNA can be created.
  • Figure 1 shows the generahzed procedure for incremental truncation.
  • Incremental truncation is performed on exonuclease susceptible DNA such as linear DNA containing a gene, gene fragment or DNA hbrary that has one end protected from digestion and the other end susceptible to digestion.
  • exonuclease susceptible DNA such as linear DNA containing a gene, gene fragment or DNA hbrary that has one end protected from digestion and the other end susceptible to digestion.
  • This is easily accomphshed, for example, by (as shown in step 1) digestion of plasmid DNA with two restriction proteins: one that produces a 3' overhang (RE3'; which is resistant to Exo III digestion) and the other which produces a 5' overhang (RE5'; which is susceptible to Exo III digestion).
  • RE3' which is resistant to Exo III digestion
  • RE5' which is susceptible to Exo III digestion
  • Step 2 illustrates the digestion with Exonuclease III which proceeds under conditions such that the digestion rate is slow enough that the removal of ahquots at frequent intervals results in a DNA hbrary with every one codon (or base pair) deletion.
  • the ends of the DNA can be blunted by treatment with a single stranded nuclease (such as SI nuclease or Mung Bean nuclease) and Klenow so that unimolecular ligation results in the desired incremental truncation library.
  • a single stranded nuclease such as SI nuclease or Mung Bean nuclease
  • Klenow so that unimolecular ligation results in the desired incremental truncation library.
  • additional DNA manipulations are required before recircularizing the vector.
  • Exo III has been used and exhibits the desired properties. Exo III has been previously shown to be useful in the creation of large truncations of hnear DNA and for techniques in the sequencing of large genes. However, previous techniques utilized the digestion rate of Exo III at 37 °C (-500 bases/min), which is much too fast for purposes of incremental truncation where every one- nucleotide base deletion is desired.
  • the digestion rate of the exonuclease can be affected by a variety of methods, such as lowering the incubation temperature, altering the digestion buffer composition, inclusion of a nuclease inhibitor or lowering the ratio of enzyme to DNA is advantageous to the present invention.
  • Embodiments of the present invention modulate conditions affecting the digestion rate of Exo III so that the degradation is slowed, thus allowing for incremental truncation where potentially every nucleotide base can be deleted.
  • plasmids N and C are two compatible vectors with origins of rephcation belonging to different compatibility groups and bearing genes coding for different antibiotic resistances.
  • the two vectors are phage mids (e.g., that they also contain a phage origin of replication) for packaging into phage particles.
  • the gene, gene fragment or gene hbrary to be truncated (shown as A and B in Table 1) is positioned downstream from a promoter.
  • the identity of some features of the vectors is shown in Table 1 and depends on ⁇ the specific application of the method.
  • the XI and X2 segments represent the piece of DNA that the ITLs of A or B are fused to in the unimolecular ligation step.
  • the use of 'RE' designates a unique restriction enzyme site.
  • RE5' and RE3' indicate that digestion with the restriction enzyme produces a 5' or 3' overhang respectively.
  • a 5' overhang is susceptible to Exo III digestion whereas a 3' overhang is not susceptible.
  • Table 1 An illustration of an application of the principles represented in Table 1 involves dividing the gene for a protein (P) into two non-active, overlapping fragments: A (containing the N-terminus of P) and B (containing the C -terminus of P) which are cloned into vectors suitable for incremental truncation.
  • XI is a series of stop codons in all three frames
  • X2 is the start codon ATG
  • T is a stop codon in frame with B.
  • Identifying points for functional bisection of an enzyme has applications in enzyme evolution and protein folding, since such bisection points potentially identify ancestral fusion points as well as independent folding units.
  • Such dissection of enzymes into smaller fragments also subverts impediments in the chemical synthesis of enzymes: enzymes too large to be chemically synthesized as a monomer can be synthesized as fragments, thus allowing the introduction of unique side chain functions.
  • the identification of functional structural motifs, subdomains, or domains will facilitate the construction of hybrid proteins and the creation of proteins with novel activities (e.g., antibiotics with improved effectiveness).
  • the construction of crossed ITLs of protein structural homologs illustrates one combinatorial approach to domain swapping made feasible by incremental truncation of the present invention.
  • Bisection of a protein in the manner described above could potentially lead to problems with association of the two fragments, particularly between structural homologs.
  • the two protein fragments may be unable or have little tendency to associate.
  • the addition of tight binding dimerization domains by using a dimerization motif could circumvent this issue.
  • This type of facilitated association of protein fragments would allow for the creation of structural-homolog heterodimers.
  • A-Xl and B-X2 fusion libraries could then be crossed into E. coli cells, as described above for example, and the functional association of the two sub units A and B would be facilitated by the dimerization of XI and X2.
  • XI and X2 should preferably be different (e.g., they form a heterodimer) so as to avoid homodimerization of A-X X1-A and B- X2:X2-B in lieu of heterodimerization (A-X X2-B).
  • Structures such as anti-parallel helixes, parallel helix-turn-helixes and inactive intein domains may also be preferable to avoid the necessity of long linkers. This type of approach would allow scanning for novel activities across famihes of proteins in one experiment, as A and B need not be a discrete genes but could be a hbrary of family members.
  • One advantage to this approach would be the ability to access very large hbraries ( ⁇ 10 ⁇ ) if vectors N and C are phagemids and can be packaged into phage particles. Since phage infection is a very efficient method of introducing vectors into E. coli, the library size is limited primarily by the number of E. coli cells in the culture. For example, if each individual A-Xl and B-X2 library has a library size of 2xl0 6 , then the crossed hbrary of these two has a maximum hbrary size of 4xl0 12 . If a liter of 10 11 E.
  • coli cells is infected with phagemid containing each of the ITL-dimer libraries, and 30% of the cells become infected with both vectors, then the crossed library size is 3xl0 10 .
  • the ability to use selection on such large hbraries can be problematic, such methodology still makes facile the creation of smaller, manageable hbraries.
  • Seamed ITCHY hbraries are created for example, referring to Table 1 wherein XI and X2 are identical restriction sites (RE 2) and T is a stop codon in frame with B.
  • the individual ITLs of A and B are constructed as in protein fragment complementation above (e.g., linearization of the plasmid DNA with RE3' and RE5' followed by incremental truncation and recircularization).
  • the ITL of B is cloned into plasmid N bearing the ITL of A between the RE2 and RE1 sites using identical restriction sites on plasmid C.
  • the resulting ITCHY library is seamed since it will contain the restriction enzyme site RE2 at the junction of the two gene fragments and thus code for foreign amino acids.
  • One third of the hbrary will have B in frame with A. If a hnker is desired between the two genes, it can be included in either XI or X2 such that it is between RE2 and the truncated gene.
  • Seamless ITCHY Libraries are useful for avoiding the seam at the interface between the two genes. This method, however, depends on the cloning of fragments with one blunt end, so the hbrary size may be less than in a seamed ITCHY.
  • the hnearized versions of vectors N and C from Table 1 are prepared by digestion with RE3' and RE5' as shown in step 4 of Figure 2.
  • Incremental truncation proceeds as in Figure 1.
  • step 5 of Figure 2 the linear ITLs are digested with RE1 and the indicated fragments are isolated.
  • step 6 of Figure 2 hgation of the fragments containing the ITL of B into the vector containing the ITL of A proceeds by a sticky end hgation at the site of the asterix and a blunt end hgation between the truncated genes.
  • plasmids N and C are digested with RE1 ( Figure 2).
  • Vector N (containing the ITL of A) is isolated away from fragment XI and the ITL of B is isolated from the rest of the vector C.
  • the ITL of B is then hgated into vector N (containing the ITL of A) by a sticky/blunt hgation.
  • the blunt end hgation is what produces the seamless fusion of the two genes.
  • the sticky end ligation (at RE1) provides directionality and improved cloning efficiency (compared to a blunt end ligation).
  • a seamless ITCHY is not easily amenable to hnker incorporation.
  • seamless ITCHY hbraries of up to 7,600,000 fusions (2,530,000 in- frame fusions) between the incremental truncation libraries of two genes. This hbrary size is the theoretical minimum necessary to have all possible fusions between two ITLs whose members contain between 0 and 2,757 deleted bases.
  • Protein splicing is a post-translational event involving precise excision of an intein fragment from precursor protein sequences. While most inteins described to date have been cis-inteins (encoded on one polypeptide), recently engineered and naturally occurring tr ⁇ ins-inteins have been described. The ability of trans- inteins to fuse potentially any two polypeptides is well suited for the creation of hybrid enzyme hbraries. A fusion example is shown in the diagram below.
  • fusion proteins of an ITL of A and the N-intein (IN) and of an ITL of B and the C-intein (Ic) associate in solution via the interaction of IN and Ic.
  • the intein heterodimer (IN:I C ) directs the sphcing reaction resulting in the joining of A to B with a native peptide bond and the release of IN:IC
  • incremental truncation is performed as in the protein fragment complementation described above, resulting in a fusion of an ITL of A to one half of the tr ⁇ ns-intein (IN) and an ITL of B to the other half of the tr ⁇ s-intein (Ic).
  • a hnker could be incorporated so that either A or B or both are fused to a hnker after incremental truncation.
  • Both vectors (containing an ITL fused to an intein or linker-intein) could then be introduced into the same cell and hybrid proteins created in vivo as a result of the intein's activity. All the hybrid protein products produced using tr ⁇ res-inteins will necessarily have a one residue from the intein at the fusion point.
  • another embodiment of the present invention provides for a method of recombining genes that does not require any sequence identity.
  • These recombination techniques use as its starting point, either seamed or (preferably) seamless ITCHY libraries as outlined above.
  • crossover points between genes in traditional DNA shuffling are defined and confined by the regions of identity
  • shuffled ITCHY hbrary crossover points are defined by the fusion-points.
  • An ITCHY library theoretically will have all possible crossover points; thus there wold be no hmitation on the location of crossover points in the resulting hybrid enzyme hbrary. It follows then, that shuffled ITCHY hbraries (which we call SCRATCHY libraries) of genes of high identity will create more diverse hbraries than traditional DNA recombination methods.
  • a SCRATCHY library can be created by making two ITCHY hbraries: one hbrary formed with gene A on the N-terminus creating A-B fusions, and one hbrary formed with gene B on the N-terminus creating B-A fusions.
  • DNA fragments of each of the A-B and B-A fusions are isolated that are approximately the same size as the original genes. This can be done by gel electrophoresis or capillary electrophoresis after restriction enzyme digestion (and judicious location of restriction sites) or after PCR with primers near or just outside the ends of fused genes.
  • This step is to attempt to ensure that the pool of DNA to be shuffled contains fusions at points on the primary and three-dimensional structure which are near each other (i.e., limit crossover points to 'intelligent' locations).
  • the SCRATCHY methodology is preferably done with genes A and B being roughly the same size.
  • This DNA with 'intelligent' crossover points may then be amplified by PCR to obtain enough sample to perform DNA recombination or shuffling.
  • the two hbraries (which include A-B and B-A PCR products of approximately the same size as the original genes) are then mixed, can then be subsequently digested with DNase I, and may be followed by a method for in vitro or in vivo recombination.
  • Fig. 3 shows an example of non-homologous shuffling or recombination of ITCHY libraries, wherein step 7 illustrates that individual A-B and B-A ITCHY hbraries are constructed, for example, as shown in Fig. 2.
  • Step 8 illustrates that either through use of outside restriction enzymes or outside PCR primers, those members of the ITCHY libraries which are approximately the same size as the original genes are isolated by gel or capillary electrophoresis.
  • these selected ITCHY library members are mixed and fragmented by digestion with DNase I as in traditional methods of DNA recombination.
  • reassembly of the random fragments can proceed by template switching that can result in full-length genes with multiple crossovers.
  • the number of hybrids appearing "in frame” will decrease exponentially with total number of crossovers.
  • the original ITCHY hbraries will only have one-third of the hybrids in- frame.
  • a resulting member of the SCRATCHY library with two crossovers will only have a 1 in 9 chance of being completely in-frame, with three crossovers having only 1 in 27 completely in-frame.
  • This circumstance can be addressed by pre-selecting the original ITCHY hbraries for hybrids in frame. For example, if gene B is fused in frame to a reporter gene with a selectable phenotype, then all in frame ITCHY hbrary members with in-frame crossover points can be selected.
  • the reporter gene need not be a part of the final SCRATCHY hbrary since it can be easily removed in the PCR steps prior to DNase I digestion.
  • Another embodiment includes the pairing of (a) a dNTP analog that can be randomly incorporated into double-stranded DNA by a DNA polymerase and (b) an enzyme with 3' to 5' exonuclease activity that is not capable of excising the incorporated dNTP analog.
  • This approach provides for: (i) the creation of an incremental truncation hbrary without requiring the labor intensive, time consuming process of taking timed ahquots during exonuclease digestion; (ii) the creation of ITCHY hbraries on a single vector avoiding purification of desired fragments; (iii) the controlled incorporation of point mutations into incremental truncation or ITCHY hbraries during a polymerase-catalyzed fill-in reaction; (iv) minimizing the biases in truncation length inherent in the other embodiments previously discussed, and (v) minimizing the number of steps required and the time required to construct an incremental truncation or ITCHY library.
  • the parental ITCHY plasmid is linearized by digestion with a pair of restriction endonucleases (RE's) that cut at unique sites in the plasmid, and thus generate a recessive 3'-termini (or flush ended termini) (Y) at the end to be truncated, and an hydrolysis-resistant termini (RE 2) including, but not limited to a recessive 5'-termini, at the other end.
  • RE's restriction endonucleases
  • Primary nuclease treatment may be carried out by an enzyme with 3' to 5' exonuclease activity, including, but not hmited to Exo III, may then be used to perform the primary digestion of the hnearized plasmid.
  • the reaction conditions (such as temperature and salt concentration) are used to adjust the reaction rate. For example, at 22°C and at a salt concentration of 100 mM NaCI a digestion rate of approximately 10 nucleobases/minute results for exonuclease III.
  • the hnearized plasmid is incubated with the 3' to 5' exonuclease to generate a single-stranded overhang. Shown as X in Figure 4C, the length of the truncated region and the digestion or cutback rate (as discussed in the previous paragraph) determine the incubation time required. In comparison to previous methods to generate incremental truncation hbraries described herein, only a single timepoint must be taken in order to obtain a full range of truncated products.
  • the single-stranded portion of the plasmid, generated by nuclease treatment, is used as the template for the resynthesis of the complementary DNA strand.
  • the reaction requires an enzyme with 5'- 3' polymerization activity, metal ions, and nucleotide triphosphates.
  • the nucleoside triphosphates in the reaction are preferably a mixture of the natural deoxynucleotides (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP) and nucleotide analogs (shown as S in Figure 4D) which are referred to as spiking the reaction.
  • the nucleotide analogs are incorporated at random during the synthesis of the complementary strand as depicted by three representative sequences shown in Fig. 4D.
  • the polymerization can be catalyzed by a DNA polymerase, including for example the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, or Taq DNA polymerase.
  • a DNA polymerase including for example the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, or Taq DNA polymerase.
  • a polymerase that lacks 3' to 5' exonuclease activity is used.
  • a thermostable enzyme such as Taq DNA polymerase, has the advantage of reducing the formation of secondary structure within the single- stranded sequence, which could interfere with primer extension.
  • metal ions including but not hmited to magnesium and manganese are presented in the primer extension reaction.
  • a single metal ion or a mixture of two or more metal ions can be added to the reaction mixture to vary the fidelity of the primer extension according to methods known in the art.
  • deoxynucleoside triphosphates dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and dTTP
  • nucleotide analogs including but not limited to ⁇ -phosphothioate deoxynucleoside triphosphates
  • concentration ratio determined by the length of the primary nuclease treatment (shown as X in Fig. 4C) so as to incorporate, on average, a single dNMP analog over the entire length of the resynthesized complementary strand.
  • the ratio for the deoxynucleoside triphosphates to deoxynucleoside triphosphate analogs can be calculated by the following equation:
  • the correction factor ⁇ is determined experimentally for the individual nucleotide analog that is used in the spiking reaction.
  • the correction factor reflects the efficiency by which the nucleotide analog is utilized by the polymerase in comparison to the natural nucleoside triphosphates.
  • the reaction mixture is then incubated at a temperature appropriate for double-strand synthesis by the enzyme.
  • the temperature therefore can, but must not necessarily, be set at the manufacturer-recommended activity optimum, giving access to additional random mutations under suboptimal reaction conditions.
  • the dNMP analog-spiked hnearized plasmid is incubated with an enzyme with 3' to 5' exonuclease activity (which carries out a second nuclease treatment) that is unable to hydrolyze the DNA beyond the dNMP analog, such as Exo III for example.
  • an enzyme with 3' to 5' exonuclease activity which carries out a second nuclease treatment
  • the hydrolysis will be terminated at the position of the nucleotide analog over the entire length of X, as shown by the three representative sequences shown in Fig. 4E, for example.
  • reaction conditions for the second nuclease treatment are somewhat less critical than those of the first nuclease treatment.
  • the RE2-site is protected from hydrolysis and the digestion by the 3' to 5' exonuclease will automatically be terminated upon encountering the dNMP analog in the DNA strand.
  • the single-stranded portions of the plasmid are degraded upon addition of a nuclease that specifically hydrolyses single-stranded DNA, for example SI nuclease or Mung bean nuclease, thereby generating blunt ends.
  • a nuclease that specifically hydrolyses single-stranded DNA for example SI nuclease or Mung bean nuclease
  • the plasmid can be briefly incubated with a DNA polymerase, preferentially the Klenow - fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I, in the presence of metal ions and the natural deoxynucleoside triphosphates.
  • a DNA polymerase preferentially the Klenow - fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I, in the presence of metal ions and the natural deoxynucleoside triphosphates.
  • the blunt-ended truncated hbrary can then be recychzed as shown in Fig. 4G, using chemical or enzymatic methods, including for example DNA ligases such as T 4 DNA ligase, at the conditions recommended by the manufacturers.
  • DNA ligases such as T 4 DNA ligase
  • the following example demonstrates the construction of fusion protein hbraries between two individual genes or gene fragments, located on a single plasmid, as shown in Fig. 5A, by simultaneous incremental truncation.
  • the hnearization can be achieved with only a single restriction endonuclease that generates a recessive 3'-termini or a flush-ended termini as symbolized by 'Y" in Fig. 5B.
  • a 3' to 5' -exonuclease for example Exo. Ill
  • a and B are hydrolyzed simultaneously over the distance X, generating a stretch of single-stranded DNA.
  • the length of X can be controlled by the reaction conditions, including but not limited to such elements as the enzyme, the composition of the reaction buffer, the reaction temperature, and the incubation period.
  • a DNA polymerase for example the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I, or Taq DNA polymerase
  • a DNA polymerase for example the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I, or Taq DNA polymerase
  • metal ions and a mixture of natural deoxynucleoside triphosphates and nucleotide analogs symbolized -S
  • Table 2 for guidehnes to determine the calculation of the required nucleotide analog concentration
  • a series of variables can be used to further randomize the DNA at this stage, including such elements as the type of DNA polymerase, the reaction buffer composition, the metal ion(s) present in the reaction mixture, and the reaction conditions in general.
  • the dNMP analog-spiked linearized plasmid is incubated with an enzyme with 3' to 5' exonuclease activity that is unable to hydrolyze the DNA beyond the dNMP analog (e.g., Exo III).
  • an enzyme with 3' to 5' exonuclease activity that is unable to hydrolyze the DNA beyond the dNMP analog (e.g., Exo III).
  • the simultaneous hydrolysis in both directions will be terminated at the position of the nucleotide analog, as depicted by three representative sequences shown in Fig. 5D.
  • the reaction conditions for the second nuclease treatment represented in Fig. 5E, are less critical.
  • the digestion by the 3' to 5' exonuclease will automaticaUy be terminated upon encountering the dNMP analog in the DNA strand.
  • a nuclease that specifically hydrolyses single-stranded DNA such as SI nuclease or Mung bean nuclease (Fig. 5F).
  • the plasmid can be briefly incubated with a DNA polymerase, preferentially the Klenow- fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I, in the presence of metal ions and the natural deoxynucleoside triphosphates.
  • a DNA polymerase preferentially the Klenow- fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I, in the presence of metal ions and the natural deoxynucleoside triphosphates.
  • the blunt-ended truncated hbrary is recyclized using chemical or enzymatic methods, including but not limited to DNA ligases, preferentially T4 DNA hgase, at the conditions recommended by the manufacturers ( Figure 5G).
  • the spiking of PCR may be carried with a parental DNA target which is amplified with 5' and 3' outside primers in the presence of dNTPs and a dNTP analog, using a DNA polymerase (including but not limited to Taq DNA polymerase) preferentially with no exonuclease activity.
  • a DNA polymerase including but not limited to Taq DNA polymerase
  • the ratio between dNTP and dNTP analog is such that on average only a single dNTP analog is incorporated per region to be truncated (as presented in example 1).
  • Reaction conditions for example reaction buffer composition, reaction temperature, metal ions (for example magnesium and manganese)
  • a unique restriction site that will afford protection to truncation is located at the end which is not to be truncated of the PCR product.
  • the amplification product is incubated with an enzyme with 3' to 5' exonuclease activity that is unable to hydrolyze the DNA beyond the dNMP analog (for example exonuclease III).
  • an enzyme with 3' to 5' exonuclease activity that is unable to hydrolyze the DNA beyond the dNMP analog (for example exonuclease III).
  • the single-stranded portion of the amplification product is degraded with nuclease that specifically hydrolyzes single-stranded DNA, for example Si nuclease or Mung Bean nuclease generating blunt ends.
  • nuclease that specifically hydrolyzes single-stranded DNA
  • the amplification product can be briefly incubated with a DNA polymerase, preferentially the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I, in the presence of metal ions and the natural dNTPs.
  • the fragment hbrary may then be cloned into a suitable vector, which may or may not contain a previously prepared DNA hbrary, according to methods known to the art.
  • a further embodiment of the present invention provides a method called circular permutated ITCHY (CP-ITCHY).
  • CP-ITCHY is a modification of previously described ITCHY that offers a number of advantages over ITCHY.
  • the general principle of this method is represented in Fig. 6.
  • the two genes (gene 1 and gene 2) are of approximately the same length (N). It is desired to make a hbrary of all possible fusions between N-terminal fragments of gene 1 and C- terminal fragments of gene 2, at or near where the two genes align.
  • the region chosen to make the fusions is between A and A+x.
  • CP-insert Between the two overlapping fragments of the two genes to be fused is located a piece of DNA (CP-insert) of length equal to the overlap in the two fragments.
  • the CP-insert has a unique restriction site randomly located within. This restriction site is the start of truncation in both directions.
  • FIG. 7a A sample vector for creating CP-ITCHY hbraries is shown in Fig. 7a.
  • the vector has an antibiotic resistance gene (ampicil n; Ap) as well as the two gene fragments (in this example, PurN[l-202] and GART[20-203]) cloned downstream of a suitable promoter (lac P/O). Between the two gene fragments is located a unique restriction enzyme site that produces blunt ends (EcoRV). This will be the site of the insertion of a circularly permuted piece of DNA.
  • the methodology for creating the CP-insert and the CP- ITCHY hbrary are described in Fig. 7b.
  • the CP-ITCHY hbrary is created by amphfying by PCR a piece of DNA equal in length to the overlap between the two gene fragments and creating a unique restriction site at both ends (in this case Xba ⁇ ) and cloning this DNA fragment into a vector such as pUCl9.
  • the DNA is excised from pUCl9 using Xbal and treated with ligase under dilute conditions such that a significant amount of closed circular DNA is formed.
  • the closed circular DNA is linearized at random sites by digestion with very dilute amounts of Dnase I.
  • the randomly hnearized DNA is repaired using a DNA polymerase and DNA hgase and cloned into the EcoRV site of pDIM-N5 by blunt end hgation.
  • This hbrary of Xbal sites between the two gene fragments is the source DNA for incremental truncation.
  • the library is digested with Xbal to linearize the vector and digested with Exo III for the length of time described in Fig. 6.
  • the single stranded overhangs are removed by Mung Bean nuclease, the ends are blunted with Klenow and ligation under diluted conditions results in the CP-ITCHY hbrary.
  • CP-ITCHY over ITCHY are (a) one vector instead of two, (b) truncation in both directions simultaneously, (c) does not require extensive time point sampling, (d) biases the library considerably towards fusions at or near where the sequences align (i.e., where it is most likely to produce active fusions), and (e) considerably shortens the protocol by removing steps such as extracting DNA from agarose electrophoretic gels.
  • kits that are generally useful for producing or constructing the various hbraries and or hybrid proteins described herein are also provided. Additional kits may be useful for making incremental truncation hbraries and/or for producing a hbrary of truncated recombinant plasmids. Useful components of such kits may include any or all of the following components:
  • a purified exonuclease reagent such as Exo III capable of unidirectionally digesting nucleotide bases in a target DNA fragment
  • a recombinant vector molecule such as a plasmid or a bacteriophage vector
  • particularly useful ones may include pDIMN2, pDIMC8, pDIMN ⁇ , pDIMN6, pDIMC9 some of which are described in Ostermeier M, Shim JH, and
  • additional useful features of the recombinant vector molecules as described in (b) above may include restriction sites, potential sequencing primer binding sites, a multiple cloning site, an antibiotic resistance morker, and/or a regulatable promoter;
  • a single-strand specific nuclease enzyme such as Mung bean nuclease or SI nuclease
  • buffer solutions useful in the kits may include exonuclease digestion buffers, a single-strand specific nuclease digestion buffer, a single-strand specific nuclease termination buffer, a DNA polymerase buffer and/or a DNA hgase buffer;
  • polymerases useful in the kits may include a DNA polymerase such as Klenow fragment or Taq DNA polymerase;
  • kits may include a mixture of dNTPs at a specific concentration; nucleotide analogs; a DNA hgase such as T4 DNA hgase or other suitable hgase; and a suitable host for selecting a protein of desired functionality.

Landscapes

  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

L'application et le succès des approches combinatoires des problèmes liés au génie protéique ont augmenté de façon spectaculaire. Toutefois, les stratégies actuelles d'évolution manquent de méthodologie combinatoire dans le cadre de la création de bibliothèques de protéines hybrides à homologie peu élevée, ou de bibliothèques de gènes très homologues présentant des fusions dans des régions non identifiées. Nous avons développé une série d'approches combinatoires qui mettent en jeu la troncation incrémentielle de gènes, de fragments de gènes ou de bibliothèques de gènes pour créer de telles bibliothèques de protéines hybrides. Une bibliothèque de toutes les délétions possibles de bases uniques d'une pièce donnée d'ADN est crée. Des bibliothèques de troncation incrémentielle (ITL) (voir figure) trouvent des applications dans le génie protéique ainsi que dans le repliement, l'évolution protéiques, et la synthèse chimique de protéines. De plus, l'invention porte sur une méthodologie de mutagénèse de l'ITL indépendante de l'homologie de la séquence d'ADN.
PCT/US2000/013813 1999-05-21 2000-05-19 Construction de bibliotheque de troncation Ceased WO2000072013A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU50309/00A AU5030900A (en) 1999-05-21 2000-05-19 Construction of incremental truncation libraries

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13542999P 1999-05-21 1999-05-21
US60/135,429 1999-05-21
US17252599P 1999-12-17 1999-12-17
US60/172,525 1999-12-17

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000072013A1 true WO2000072013A1 (fr) 2000-11-30

Family

ID=26833315

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/013813 Ceased WO2000072013A1 (fr) 1999-05-21 2000-05-19 Construction de bibliotheque de troncation

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU5030900A (fr)
WO (1) WO2000072013A1 (fr)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001075158A1 (fr) * 1999-12-17 2001-10-11 The Penn State Research Foundation Acides nucleiques tronques progressivement et procedes permettant de les preparer
WO2002048351A3 (fr) * 2000-12-12 2003-06-05 Alligator Bioscience Ab Procede destine a l'evolution moleculaire in vitro d'une fonction proteinique
US6958213B2 (en) 2000-12-12 2005-10-25 Alligator Bioscience Ab Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US7153655B2 (en) 1998-06-16 2006-12-26 Alligator Bioscience Ab Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function involving the use of exonuclease enzyme and two populations of parent polynucleotide sequence
US7262012B2 (en) 2002-05-17 2007-08-28 Alligator Bioscience Ab Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function using varied exonuclease digestion in two polynucleotide populations
EP1842915A1 (fr) * 2006-04-04 2007-10-10 Libragen Procédé de production in vitro aléatoires de séquences polynucléeotidiques par fragmentation et ligation récursive circulaire de molécules d'ADN

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
HULTMAN ET AL.: "Solid-phase cloning to create sulibraries suitable for DNA sequencing", JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY,, vol. 35, June 1994 (1994-06-01), pages 229 - 238, XP002931121 *
OSTERMEIER ET AL.: "Combinatorial protein engineering by incremental truncation", PROC. NATL. ACAD. SCI. USA,, vol. 96, March 1999 (1999-03-01), pages 3562 - 3567, XP002931122 *

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7153655B2 (en) 1998-06-16 2006-12-26 Alligator Bioscience Ab Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function involving the use of exonuclease enzyme and two populations of parent polynucleotide sequence
US7332308B1 (en) 1999-05-21 2008-02-19 The Penn State Research Foundation Incrementally truncated nucleic acids and methods of making same
WO2001075158A1 (fr) * 1999-12-17 2001-10-11 The Penn State Research Foundation Acides nucleiques tronques progressivement et procedes permettant de les preparer
WO2002048351A3 (fr) * 2000-12-12 2003-06-05 Alligator Bioscience Ab Procede destine a l'evolution moleculaire in vitro d'une fonction proteinique
US6958213B2 (en) 2000-12-12 2005-10-25 Alligator Bioscience Ab Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US7282334B2 (en) 2000-12-12 2007-10-16 Alligator Bioscience, Ab Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US7563578B2 (en) 2000-12-12 2009-07-21 Alligator Bioscience Ab Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US7262012B2 (en) 2002-05-17 2007-08-28 Alligator Bioscience Ab Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function using varied exonuclease digestion in two polynucleotide populations
EP1842915A1 (fr) * 2006-04-04 2007-10-10 Libragen Procédé de production in vitro aléatoires de séquences polynucléeotidiques par fragmentation et ligation récursive circulaire de molécules d'ADN
WO2007113688A3 (fr) * 2006-04-04 2008-01-17 Libragen Procédé de réarrangement de séquences polynucléotidiques in vitro par fragmentation et ligature récursives de molécules d'adn circulaire

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU5030900A (en) 2000-12-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US12371724B2 (en) Methods for in vitro joining and combinatorial assembly of nucleic acid molecules
US6159688A (en) Methods of producing polynucleotide variants
EP0996718B1 (fr) Methode de constitution d'une bibliotheque par rearrangement d'adn
EP1358322B1 (fr) Procede destine a ameliorer la complementarite d'un heteroduplex
US7820413B2 (en) Incrementally truncated nucleic acids and methods of making same
JPH1066576A (ja) 突出末端を有する2本鎖dna及びこれを用いたdnaのシャフリング方法
WO2000072013A1 (fr) Construction de bibliotheque de troncation
Ostermeier et al. Construction of hybrid gene libraries involving the circular permutation of DNA
Pera et al. Hybrid enzymes
EP1548113B1 (fr) Procédé pour l'obtention de polynucléotides circulaires mutés et/ou chimériques
EP1383910A2 (fr) Elaboration d'echantillotheques de polynucleotides et identification d'elements de l'echantillotheque presentant les caracteristiques attendues
ZA200306203B (en) A method of increasing complementarity in a heteroduplex polynucleotide.
AU2002307170A1 (en) Methods for the preparation of polynucleotide librairies and identification of library members having desired characteristics

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP