WO1999005634A1 - Clinical examination analyzer - Google Patents
Clinical examination analyzer Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1999005634A1 WO1999005634A1 PCT/JP1998/001008 JP9801008W WO9905634A1 WO 1999005634 A1 WO1999005634 A1 WO 1999005634A1 JP 9801008 W JP9801008 W JP 9801008W WO 9905634 A1 WO9905634 A1 WO 9905634A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- department
- value
- ward
- same
- check
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H10/00—ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data
- G16H10/40—ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data for data related to laboratory analysis, e.g. patient specimen analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H10/00—ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data
- G16H10/60—ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data for patient-specific data, e.g. for electronic patient records
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a clinical test analyzer, and more particularly to a clinical test analyzer having a check function for discriminating test result data (measurement value) having high abnormality due to a test error or the like from proper test result data. . Background art
- a blood test such as a blood test is performed on each sample (sample to be tested for each patient), and the test result data of the biochemical test is accumulated on a database, etc., and the test results are collected.
- an inspection abnormality check that discriminates between the inspection result data that is highly abnormal due to an inspection error and the appropriate inspection result data using an individual management method such as the previous value check Those having a function are known.
- test result data previously value
- Z or ratio between the test result and the previous value. If the difference and Z or ratio exceed the preset allowable range (standard value for checking the change in measured value), check the test result. It is determined that the data is abnormal.
- the latest inspection result data is checked for comparison with the preset upper and lower limits (standard values for whether the measured value is too large or too small) and exceeds the upper limit. In the case where it is less than the lower limit, it is determined that the abnormality of the inspection result data is high.
- Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 8-147473 / 96 discloses the same subject. There is shown a clinical test analyzer that sets a check reference value for measurement value change and a check value for suitability of measurement value over / under according to the number of days elapsed since the previous test date.
- the clinical test analyzer disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 8-1477396 achieves the initial purpose and performs the abnormal test at a relatively high hit rate. There is room for improvement to achieve even higher hit rates.
- the present inventor conducted further statistical considerations on test result data, and found that the distribution of measured values of clinical tests such as blood tests, for example, the distribution of measured values of TP (total protein) test
- TP total protein
- the present invention has been made by paying attention to the above-mentioned points, and the reference value for the propriety check in the inspection abnormality check by the individual management method such as the previous value check is individually determined according to internal medicine, rheumatology, surgery, etc.
- the purpose of the present invention is to provide a clinical test analyzer capable of further increasing the hit rate of a test by setting the test value and obtaining a highly reliable test result with a highly reliable measurement value. Disclosure of the invention
- the clinical test analyzer includes: storage means for storing a measurement value for each test item of a specimen together with identification information of a subject, a test date, and information on a type of a consultation department; For the same subject stored in the storage means, the number of days elapsed since the previous examination date and the same consultation department, the validity of the measurement value for each consultation department or ward department based on the measurement value belonging to the same ward department Consultation departments that set check standard values
- the check criteria setting means and the consultation department / ward department pass / fail check criteria setting means the elapsed test days of the same subject and the number of examinations for each consultation department become the pass / fail check reference values set for each ward department.
- evaluation means for evaluating the suitability of the current measured values based on this.
- the check reference value is for checking an upper limit value and a lower limit value of an allowable measured value, that is, for checking upper and lower limits. Further, in the clinical laboratory analyzer according to the present invention, the check reference value is an allowable limit value for a difference and / or a ratio of a current value to a previous value, that is, a value for a previous value (Del-Yu) check. is there.
- the means for setting the checkability standard for each consultation department / ward department may be for the same consultation department or the same ward department, and may be used for all the same test items having the same number of days elapsed.
- the consultation department / ward department suitability check criteria setting means considers a correlation with another test item for each same consultation department or same ward department. This sets the appropriateness check reference value for checking between items.
- FIG. 1 is a functional configuration diagram showing an embodiment of a clinical test analyzer according to the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing a reception input screen in the clinical test analyzer according to the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the clinical test analyzer according to the present invention.
- FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of a clinical test analyzer according to the present invention.
- the clinical laboratory analyzer includes a reception information input unit 10 for inputting clinical test reception information, a measurement value input unit 12 for inputting clinical test measurement values, a database storage unit 14, a consultation department and a ward department. It has a separate compliance check reference value setting unit 16, a check unit (evaluation means) 18, a display device 20, a printer 22, and a log file storage unit 24 that accumulates and retains the history of inspection results. I have.
- the reception information input section 10 is a reception input screen, as shown in Fig. 2, where the reception date, reception number, patient ID, name, date of birth, gender, dialysis Include presence / absence, physician's name, request department (consultation department), ward department, and test items.
- the measurement value input unit 12 captures the measurement value of each test item of the sample by the biochemical testing device online or offline together with the identification information of the subject and the test date.
- a blood test device is assumed as the biochemical test device, and the test items are TP (total protein), ALB (albumin), Na (sodium), K (potassium), C1 (chlorine). ), Ca (calcium), BUN (urea nitrogen), creatinine, GLU (glucose), Amy (amylase), GOT (glutamic acid-oxaloacetic transaminase), GPT (glutamic acid-pyruvate transaminase), T-one BIL (total pyrilvin), Alp (alkaline phosphatase), CK (creatine kinase), LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) and the like.
- the database storage unit 14 stores the measured values for each test item of the sample from the received information input from the received information input unit 10 and the measured values for each test item of the sample input from the measured value input unit 12. Is stored in the form of a database file together with the ward department type information together with the identification information of the subject, the examination date, and the department information.
- Consultation departments' ward department compliance check reference value setting unit 16 stores the same subject in the database storage unit 14 as the number of days elapsed since the previous examination date of the same subject, Is used to set the reference value for the appropriateness of the measured values for each consultation department or ward department based on the measured values belonging to the same ward.
- the upper limit and lower limit for the single item upper and lower limit check are the upper limit and lower limit of the measurement values that are allowed according to the number of days elapsed since the previous test date of the same subject, by consultation department or ward department for each test item. Is set.
- the limits for Dell evening check are acceptable limits for the difference and Z or ratio of the latest value to the previous value, and the setting of these limits is for the same department or ward.
- the frequency distribution data between the previous measurement value and the current measurement value is acquired for each identical measurement value or for each predetermined measurement value width, From the frequency distribution data or the scatter data, the measurement is performed for each same measurement value or for each predetermined measurement value width.
- the maximum frequency value is the measured value difference and the ratio or ratio of the minimum frequency value satisfying a predetermined ratio with respect to the total frequency value.
- the frequency distribution data is normally distributed for the same measurement value or for each predetermined measurement value width, and the minimum frequency value that satisfies the predetermined ratio with respect to the maximum frequency value or the total frequency value of the normally distributed frequency distribution data.
- the measured value difference and Z or ratio, or the frequency distribution data were normalized for the same measurement value or for each predetermined measurement value width, and the sum of the distribution frequencies from the outer edge of the normal distribution was normalized.
- Maximum degree of frequency distribution data The numerical value is the measured value difference and Z or ratio of the smallest frequency value that satisfies the specified ratio to the total frequency value.
- the limit value for inter-item check is set in consideration of the correlation with other test items for the same department or ward.
- the check section 18 receives the current measurement value from the measured value input section 12 and receives the pass / fail ward pass / fail criterion value for each consultation department and ward department from the clinic / ward department pass / fail check reference value setting section 16. Perform single item upper / lower limit check, delta check, and inter-item check.
- the single item upper / lower limit check is based on the upper limit of the relevant department and the ward department that the current measurement value entered from the measurement value input section 1 and 2 is set by the clinic department And whether the current measured value is smaller than the lower limit of the relevant department or ward set by the department / ward department compliance check reference value setting unit 16
- the check section 18 warns that if the current measurement value is greater than the upper limit value or if the current measurement value is smaller than the lower limit value, the current measurement value deviates from the check reference value. Is output to the display device 20 and the printer 22 together with information indicating the reason, that is, an error message.
- the difference between the current measurement value input from the measurement value input unit 12 and the previous measurement value stored in the database storage unit 14 is determined by the consultation department and ward. It is determined by whether or not it is within the ascending or descending limit value of the relevant consultation department / ward department set by the departmental appropriateness check reference value setting section 16.
- the check section 18 is limited If the value is equal to or greater than the value, the current measurement value is deviated from the check reference value, and a warning is output to the display device 20 and the printer 22 together with information indicating the reason, that is, an error message.
- the delta check is an ascending change, so it is determined whether or not the difference value is within the ascending limit value. If the difference between the value and the previous value is a minus sign, it is a decreasing change, It is determined whether or not the difference value is within the lower limit value. Similar determination can be made by using a ratio between the previous value and the current value, or a combination of the difference and the ratio.
- the inter-item chips are set by the current measurement values of the two test items that have a correlation from the measurement value input unit 12 and the check reference value setting unit 16 by the consultation department / ward department. This is done by comparing the threshold values for tips between the relevant consultation departments and ward departments, and if the current measurement value exceeds the limit value, If the value exceeds the check reference value, a warning is output to the display device 20 and the printer 22 together with information indicating the reason, that is, an error message.
- the current measured value is obtained from the measured value input unit 12 (step S10), and reception information is obtained from the database storage unit 14 (step S20).
- reception information is obtained from the database storage unit 14 (step S20).
- step S40 If the limit value for each consultation department and ward department is not defined, the default limit value existing in the consultation department and ward department appropriateness check reference value setting unit 16 is acquired (step S40). . On the other hand, if the limit value for each consultation department and ward department is defined, the limit value for the relevant consultation department and ward department is set from the consultation department and ward department compliance check reference value setting unit 16. Acquire (step S50).
- the check unit 18 compares the current measured value from the measured value input unit 12 with the obtained limit value to perform a single item upper / lower limit check, a delta check, and a check between items. (Step S60).
- check results are displayed on the display device 20 on a screen, the check list is printed by the printer 22, and the information is output to the log file storage unit 24 as history information (step S 70). .
- the clinical test analyzer uses the date of the last measurement. Calculate the number of days elapsed from the measurement date and the current measurement date, and set the reference values for single-item check, delta check, and item-to-item check based on the number of days elapsed and the previous value for each consultation department or ward department. Since the current value is evaluated based on the check reference value for each department or ward, the tendency of the test result data for each test item can be reflected in the evaluation judgment, and as a result, the The inspection rate can be improved and more reliable inspection results can be obtained.
- the number of days that have elapsed since the previous examination date of the same subject and the measurement values belonging to the same consultation department or the same ward department stored in the storage means Since the criteria for the appropriateness of the measurement values are set for each consultation department or ward department, the tendency of the examination department or ward department of the test result data for each test item can be reflected in the evaluation judgment, and as a result, The hit rate of inspection can be improved, and more reliable inspection results can be obtained.
- the check reference value is an upper limit value and a lower limit value of an allowable measurement value, that is, a limit value of a single item check, and a limit value of the single item check.
- the check reference value is an allowable limit value of a difference and / or a ratio of a current value to a previous value, that is, a limit value of a delta check.
- the limit value As regards the setting of the limit value, the tendency of the examination result data for each examination department or ward department in the examination result data is reflected, and as a result, the test hit rate can be improved and more reliable examination results can be obtained. it can.
- all the measured values for the same examination department or the same ward and for the same elapsed days of the same test item, and for each of the same measured values, Is used to obtain frequency distribution data or scatter data between the previous measurement value and the current measurement value for each predetermined measurement value width.
- Limitation of delta check for each measured value or specified measured value width Since the threshold value is set, the trend of each ward department is statistically accurately reflected in the setting of the delta check, and the trend of each ward department on the test result data for each test item is as follows. The inspection hit rate can be improved, and more reliable inspection results can be obtained.
- the pass / fail check reference value is set in consideration of the correlation with other test items for the same consultation department or the same ward department.
- the setting of the limit value of the check the tendency of the test result data of each test item for each consultation department or ward department is statistically accurately reflected, and as a result, the hit rate of the test can be improved, More reliable test results can be obtained.
- the clinical test analyzer according to the present invention further improves the hit rate of the test by individually setting the suitability check reference value in the test abnormality check by the individual management method such as the previous value check. It is especially useful for internal medicine, rheumatology, surgery, etc., and is suitable for obtaining high test results, high credibility, and high reliability with measured values. .
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)
- Measuring And Recording Apparatus For Diagnosis (AREA)
Abstract
Description
明 钿 書 臨床検査分析装置 技術分野 Description Clinical laboratory analyzers Technical field
この発明は、 臨床検査分析装置に係り、 特に、 検査ミスなどに起因して異常性 が高い検査結果データ (測定値) と適正な検査結果データとを差別するチェック 機能を有する臨床検査分析装置に関する。 背景技術 The present invention relates to a clinical test analyzer, and more particularly to a clinical test analyzer having a check function for discriminating test result data (measurement value) having high abnormality due to a test error or the like from proper test result data. . Background art
臨床検査分析装置として、 各検体 (各患者の被検査試料) について血液検査な どの生化学的検査を行レ その生化学的検査の検查結果データをデー夕ベースな どに蓄積し、 検査結果を評価する際に、 検查ミスなどに起因して異常性が高い検 查結果デ一夕と適正な検査結果データとを前回値チ ック等の個別管理手法によ つて差別する検査異常チェック機能を有するものが知られている。 As a clinical laboratory analyzer, a blood test such as a blood test is performed on each sample (sample to be tested for each patient), and the test result data of the biochemical test is accumulated on a database, etc., and the test results are collected. When assessing inspections, an inspection abnormality check that discriminates between the inspection result data that is highly abnormal due to an inspection error and the appropriate inspection result data using an individual management method such as the previous value check Those having a function are known.
この臨床検査分析装置においては、 ある一^ 3の検査項目について、 以前に行つ た検查結果データ (前回値) がデータべ一ス内に蓄積されている場合には、 今回 (最新) の検査結果と前回値との差および Zまたは比を計算し、 この差および Z または比が予め設定されている許容範囲 (測定値変化の適否チェック基準値) を 越えている場合には、 検査結果データの異常性が高いと判定することが行われる ものである。 In this clinical test analyzer, if the test result data (previous value) performed for a certain 3 test items is stored in the database, Calculate the difference and Z or ratio between the test result and the previous value. If the difference and Z or ratio exceed the preset allowable range (standard value for checking the change in measured value), check the test result. It is determined that the data is abnormal.
また、 最新の検査結果データについても、 予め設定されている許容上限値およ び許容下限値 (測定値の過大■過小の適否チ ック基準値) との比較チェックを 行い、 上限値を越える場合あるいは下限値を下回る場合には、 検査結果データの 異常性が高いと判定することが行われる。 In addition, the latest inspection result data is checked for comparison with the preset upper and lower limits (standard values for whether the measured value is too large or too small) and exceeds the upper limit. In the case where it is less than the lower limit, it is determined that the abnormality of the inspection result data is high.
上述のような前回値チ ック等の個別管理手法による異常判定 (検査異常チェ ック) を、 高ヒット率で行うためには、 判定基準になる測定値変化の適否チェッ ク基準値や測定値の過大 ·過小の適否チェック基準値が適正に設定される必要が あり、 このことに鑑みて、 特開平 8— 1 4 7 3 9 6号公報には、 同一被検者の前 回の検査日よりの経過日数に応じて測定値変化の適否チエック基準値や測定値の 過大 ·過小の適否チェック基準値を設定する臨床検査分析装置が示されている。 特開平 8— 1 4 7 3 9 6号公報に示されている臨床検査分析装置は、 初期の目 的を達成し、 検査異常チ ックを比較的高ヒッ ト率で行うが、 検査異常チニック を、 より一層、 高ヒッ ト率で行うための改善の余地がある。 In order to perform anomaly judgment (inspection abnormality check) by the individual management method such as the previous value check as described above at a high hit rate, it is necessary to check the appropriateness of the measured value change that becomes the criterion. In view of this, it is necessary to appropriately set the reference value for checking whether the reference value or the measured value is too large or too small, and in consideration of this, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 8-147473 / 96 discloses the same subject. There is shown a clinical test analyzer that sets a check reference value for measurement value change and a check value for suitability of measurement value over / under according to the number of days elapsed since the previous test date. The clinical test analyzer disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 8-1477396 achieves the initial purpose and performs the abnormal test at a relatively high hit rate. There is room for improvement to achieve even higher hit rates.
このことに鑑みて、 本願発明者は、 検査結果データについて、 更なる統計的な 考察を行ったところ、 血液検査等の臨床検査の測定値分布状況、 たとえば T P ( 総蛋白) 検査測定値の分布状況は、 内蔵疾患者が多い内科のものと、 通常、 内蔵 疾患者が少ないと考えられるリュ一マチ科や外科のものとでは、 異なったものに なることを見い出した。 In view of this, the present inventor conducted further statistical considerations on test result data, and found that the distribution of measured values of clinical tests such as blood tests, for example, the distribution of measured values of TP (total protein) test The situation was found to be different for internal medicine with more visceral diseases than for rheumatology and surgery, which are usually considered to have fewer visceral diseases.
従って、 検査異常チヱックを、 より一層、 高ヒッ ト率で行うためには、 内科、 リューマチ科、 外科等に応じて測定値変化の適否チ ック基準値や測定値の過大 ·過小の適否チェック基準値を個別に設定すべきであると云うことに到達した。 この発明は、 上述のことに着目してなされたものであり、 前回値チェック等の 個別管理手法による検査異常チェックにおける適否チェック基準値を、 内科、 リ ュ一マチ科、 外科等に応じて個別に設定することで、 検査のヒッ ト率を、 より一 層高め、 信憑性の高い測定値をもって信頼性の高い検査結果を得ることができる 臨床検査分析装置を提供することを目的としている。 発明の開示 Therefore, in order to perform inspection abnormal check at a higher hit rate, it is necessary to check whether the measured value changes according to internal medicine, rheumatology, surgery, etc. It has been reached that the reference values should be set individually. The present invention has been made by paying attention to the above-mentioned points, and the reference value for the propriety check in the inspection abnormality check by the individual management method such as the previous value check is individually determined according to internal medicine, rheumatology, surgery, etc. The purpose of the present invention is to provide a clinical test analyzer capable of further increasing the hit rate of a test by setting the test value and obtaining a highly reliable test result with a highly reliable measurement value. Disclosure of the invention
この発明にかかる臨床検査分析装置は、 検体の各検査項目毎の測定値を被検者 の識別情報と検査日および受診科種別情報あるレ、は病棟科種別情報と共に記憶す る記憶手段と、 前記記憶手段に記憶されている同一被検者の前回の検査日よりの 経過日数と同一受診科あるレ、は同一病棟科に属する測定値より受診科別あるいは 病棟科別に前記測定値の適否チ ック基準値を設定する受診科 ·病棟科別適否チ ック基準設定手段と、 前記受診科 ·病棟科別適否チ ック基準設定手段により 同一被検者の検査経過日数と受診科別あるレ、は病棟科別に設定される適否チェッ ク基準値に基づき今回の測定値の適否を評価する評価手段とを有しているもので め 。 The clinical test analyzer according to the present invention includes: storage means for storing a measurement value for each test item of a specimen together with identification information of a subject, a test date, and information on a type of a consultation department; For the same subject stored in the storage means, the number of days elapsed since the previous examination date and the same consultation department, the validity of the measurement value for each consultation department or ward department based on the measurement value belonging to the same ward department Consultation departments that set check standard values By the check criteria setting means and the consultation department / ward department pass / fail check criteria setting means, the elapsed test days of the same subject and the number of examinations for each consultation department become the pass / fail check reference values set for each ward department. And evaluation means for evaluating the suitability of the current measured values based on this.
また、 この発明にかかる臨床検査分析装置は、 前記チェック基準値は、 許容さ れる測定値の上限値と下限値、 すなわち、 上下限チェック用のものである。 また、 この発明にかかる臨床検査分析装置は、 前記チェック基準値は、 今回値 の前回値に対する差および/または比について、 許容し得る限界値、 すなわち、 前回値 (デル夕) チヱック用のものである。 Further, in the clinical test analyzer according to the present invention, the check reference value is for checking an upper limit value and a lower limit value of an allowable measured value, that is, for checking upper and lower limits. Further, in the clinical laboratory analyzer according to the present invention, the check reference value is an allowable limit value for a difference and / or a ratio of a current value to a previous value, that is, a value for a previous value (Del-Yu) check. is there.
また、 この発明にかかる臨床検査分析装置は、 前記受診科 ·病棟科別適否チェ ック基準設定手段は、 同一受診科あるいは同一病棟科のもので、 同一検査項目の 同一経過日数のものにおける全測定値にっレ、て同一測定値毎あるレ、は所定測定値 幅毎に、 前回の測定値と今回の測定値との度数分布データあるいは散布デー夕を 取得し、 この度数分布データあるいは散布デ一夕より同一測定値毎あるいは所定 測定値幅毎に前回値チニック用の限界値を設定するものである。 Further, in the clinical test analyzer according to the present invention, the means for setting the checkability standard for each consultation department / ward department may be for the same consultation department or the same ward department, and may be used for all the same test items having the same number of days elapsed. Obtain frequency distribution data or scatter data between the previous measurement value and the current measurement value for each predetermined measurement value width, and obtain the frequency distribution data or scatter From last day, the limit value for the previous value chinic is set for each of the same measurement values or for each predetermined measurement value range.
また、 この発明にかかる臨床検查分析装置は、 前記受診科 ·病棟科別適否チェ ック基準設定手段は同一受診科あるいは同一病棟科毎に他の検査項目との相関関 係を考慮して項目間チェック用の適否チ ック基準値を設定するものである。 図面の簡単な説明 Further, in the clinical examination analyzer according to the present invention, the consultation department / ward department suitability check criteria setting means considers a correlation with another test item for each same consultation department or same ward department. This sets the appropriateness check reference value for checking between items. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
第 1図は、 この発明にかかる臨床検査分析装置の一実施の形態を示す機能構成 図であり、 第 2図は、 この発明にかかる臨床検査分析装置における受付入力画面 を示す説明図であり、 第 3図は、 この発明にかかる臨床検査分析装置の動作を説 明するフローチヤ一トである。 発明を実施するための最良の形態 以下に添付の図を参照してこの発明に係る臨床検査分析装置の実施の形態を詳 細に説明する。 FIG. 1 is a functional configuration diagram showing an embodiment of a clinical test analyzer according to the present invention. FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing a reception input screen in the clinical test analyzer according to the present invention. FIG. 3 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the clinical test analyzer according to the present invention. BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Hereinafter, an embodiment of a clinical test analyzer according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
第 1図は、 この発明による臨床検査分析装置の一つの実施の形態を示している 。 臨床検査分析装置は、 臨床検査の受付情報を入力する受付情報入力部 1 0と、 臨床検査の測定値を入力する測定値入力部 1 2と、 データベース記憶部 1 4と、 受診科 ·病棟科別適否チ ック基準値設定部 1 6と、 チェック部 (評価手段) 1 8と、 表示装置 20と、 プリンタ 22と、 検査結果の履歴を蓄積保持するログフ アイル記憶部 24とを有している。 FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of a clinical test analyzer according to the present invention. The clinical laboratory analyzer includes a reception information input unit 10 for inputting clinical test reception information, a measurement value input unit 12 for inputting clinical test measurement values, a database storage unit 14, a consultation department and a ward department. It has a separate compliance check reference value setting unit 16, a check unit (evaluation means) 18, a display device 20, a printer 22, and a log file storage unit 24 that accumulates and retains the history of inspection results. I have.
受付情報入力部 1 0は、 第 2図に示されているような、 受付入力画面で、 臨床 検査の受付情報として、 受付日、 受付番号、 患者 I D、 氏名、 生年月日、 性別、 透析の有無、 医師名、 依頼科 (受診科) 、 病棟科、 検査項目を取り込む。 測定値 入力部 1 2は、 生化学検査装置による検体の各検査項目毎の測定値を、 オンライ ンあるいオフラインで、 被検者の識別情報および検査日と共に取り込む。 The reception information input section 10 is a reception input screen, as shown in Fig. 2, where the reception date, reception number, patient ID, name, date of birth, gender, dialysis Include presence / absence, physician's name, request department (consultation department), ward department, and test items. The measurement value input unit 12 captures the measurement value of each test item of the sample by the biochemical testing device online or offline together with the identification information of the subject and the test date.
なお、 ここでは、 生化学検査装置として血液検査装置を想定し、 検査項目とし ては、 TP (総蛋白) 、 ALB (アルブミン) 、 Na (ナトリウム) 、 K (カリ ゥ厶) 、 C 1 (塩素) 、 Ca (カルシウム) 、 BUN (尿素窒素) 、 クレアチニ ン、 GLU (グルコース) 、 Amy (アミラーゼ) 、 GOT (グルタミン酸—ォ キサロ酢酸トランスアミナーゼ) 、 GPT (グル夕ミン酸ーピルビン酸トランス アミナーゼ) 、 T一 B I L (総ピリルビン) 、 A l p (アルカリ性ホスファタ一 ゼ) 、 CK (クレアチンキナーゼ) 、 LDH (乳酸デヒドロゲナ一ゼ) 等が挙げ られる。 Here, a blood test device is assumed as the biochemical test device, and the test items are TP (total protein), ALB (albumin), Na (sodium), K (potassium), C1 (chlorine). ), Ca (calcium), BUN (urea nitrogen), creatinine, GLU (glucose), Amy (amylase), GOT (glutamic acid-oxaloacetic transaminase), GPT (glutamic acid-pyruvate transaminase), T-one BIL (total pyrilvin), Alp (alkaline phosphatase), CK (creatine kinase), LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) and the like.
データベース記憶部 1 4は、 受付情報入力部 1 0より入力された受付情報と測 定値入力部 1 2より入力された検体の各検査項目毎の測定値より、 検体の各検査 項目毎の測定値を被検者の識別情報と検査日および受診科種別情報あるレ、は病棟 科種別情報と共にデータベースファイル形式で記憶する。 The database storage unit 14 stores the measured values for each test item of the sample from the received information input from the received information input unit 10 and the measured values for each test item of the sample input from the measured value input unit 12. Is stored in the form of a database file together with the ward department type information together with the identification information of the subject, the examination date, and the department information.
受診科 '病棟科別適否チェック基準値設定部 1 6は、 データベース記憶部 1 4 に ΐ己憶されている同一被検者の前回の検査日よりの経過日数と同一受診科あるし、 は同一病棟に属する測定値より受診科別あるいは病棟科別に測定値の適否チェッ ク基準値を設定するものであり、 単項目上下限チニック用の限界値と、 デルタチ ェック用の限界値と、 項目間チニック用の限界値を受診科別あるいは病棟科別に 設定する。 Consultation departments' ward department compliance check reference value setting unit 16 stores the same subject in the database storage unit 14 as the number of days elapsed since the previous examination date of the same subject, Is used to set the reference value for the appropriateness of the measured values for each consultation department or ward department based on the measured values belonging to the same ward.The limit value for single item upper / lower limit clinic, the limit value for delta check, and the Set limits for interim clinic by consultation department or ward department.
単項目上下限チェック用の限界値は、 同一被検者の前回の検査日より経過日数 に応じて許容される測定値の上限値と下限値を各検査項目毎に受診科別あるいは 病棟科別に設定される。 The upper limit and lower limit for the single item upper and lower limit check are the upper limit and lower limit of the measurement values that are allowed according to the number of days elapsed since the previous test date of the same subject, by consultation department or ward department for each test item. Is set.
デル夕チ ック用の限界値は、 最新値の前回値に対する差および Zまたは比に ついて、 許容し得る限界値であり、 この限界値の設定は、 同一受診科あるいは同 —病棟のもので、 同一検査項目の同一経過日数のものにおける全測定値について 同一測定値毎あるいは所定測定値幅毎に、 前回の測定値と今回の測定値との度数 分布デ一夕あるいは散布デー夕を取得し、 この度数分布デ一夕あるいは散布デー 夕より同一測定値毎あるいは所定測定値幅毎に行われる。 The limits for Dell evening check are acceptable limits for the difference and Z or ratio of the latest value to the previous value, and the setting of these limits is for the same department or ward. For all measured values of the same test item with the same elapsed days, the frequency distribution data between the previous measurement value and the current measurement value is acquired for each identical measurement value or for each predetermined measurement value width, From the frequency distribution data or the scatter data, the measurement is performed for each same measurement value or for each predetermined measurement value width.
このデルタチエツク用限界値の設定では、 つぎのような設定法を採用すること ができる。 In setting the delta check limit value, the following setting method can be adopted.
( 1 ) 度数分布データより同一測定値毎あるいは所定測定値幅毎に最大度数値あ るいは度数総和値を算出し、 その最大度数値あるいは度数総和値に対して所定比 率を満たす最少の度数値の測定値差および Zまたは比。 (1) From the frequency distribution data, calculate the maximum frequency value or total frequency value for each identical measurement value or each predetermined measurement value width, and calculate the minimum frequency value that satisfies the specified ratio for the maximum frequency value or total frequency value. Measurement difference and Z or ratio.
( 2 ) 度数分布デー夕より同一測定値毎あるし、は所定測定値幅毎に最大度数値あ るいは度数総、和値を算出し、 その度数分布における分布外縁からの分布度数の総 和が前記最大度数値あるレ、は度数総和値に対して所定比率を満たす最少の度数値 の測定値差およひゾまたは比。 (2) From the frequency distribution data, the same measured value is obtained, or the maximum frequency value or total frequency and sum value are calculated for each predetermined measurement value width, and the sum of the distribution frequency from the outer edge of the frequency distribution is calculated. The maximum frequency value is the measured value difference and the ratio or ratio of the minimum frequency value satisfying a predetermined ratio with respect to the total frequency value.
( 3 ) 度数分布データを同一測定値毎あるいは所定測定値幅毎に正規分布化し、 正規分布化された度数分布デ一タの最大度数値あるいは度数総和値に対して所定 比率を満たす最少の度数値の測定値差および Zまたは比、 あるいは度数分布デー 夕を同一測定値毎あるいは所定測定値幅毎に正規分布化し、 その正規分布化にお ける分布外縁からの分布度数の総和が正規分布化された度数分布データの最大度 数値あるレ、は度数総和値に対して所定比率を満たす最少の度数値の測定値差およ び Zまたは比。 (3) The frequency distribution data is normally distributed for the same measurement value or for each predetermined measurement value width, and the minimum frequency value that satisfies the predetermined ratio with respect to the maximum frequency value or the total frequency value of the normally distributed frequency distribution data. The measured value difference and Z or ratio, or the frequency distribution data were normalized for the same measurement value or for each predetermined measurement value width, and the sum of the distribution frequencies from the outer edge of the normal distribution was normalized. Maximum degree of frequency distribution data The numerical value is the measured value difference and Z or ratio of the smallest frequency value that satisfies the specified ratio to the total frequency value.
なお、 これらの設定法について、 より詳細は説明が必要ならば、 特開平 8— 1 4 7 3 9 6号公報を参照されたい。 In addition, if it is necessary to explain these setting methods in more detail, refer to Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 8-147396.
項目間チ ック用の限界値は、 同一受診科あるいは同一病棟毎に他の検査項目 との相関関係を考慮して設定される。 The limit value for inter-item check is set in consideration of the correlation with other test items for the same department or ward.
チェック部 1 8は、 測定値入力部 1 2より今回の測定値を受診科 ·病棟科別適 否チェック基準値設定部 1 6より受診科 ·病棟科別の適否チ ック基準値を与え られ、 単項目上下限チェックと、 デルタチヱックと、 項目間チヱックとを行う。 単項目上下限チェックは、 測定値入力部 1 2より入力された今回の測定値が受 診科 ·病棟科別適否チエツク基準値設定部 1 6が設定した該当する受診科 ·病棟 科の上限値より大きいか否かの判別と、 今回の測定値が受診科 ·病棟科別適否チ ェック基準値設定部 1 6が設定した該当する受診科 ·病棟科の下限値より小さい か否かの判別によって行われ、 チェック部 1 8は、 今回の測定値が上限値より大 きいか、 あるいは今回の測定値が下限値より小さい場合には、 今回の測定値がチ エック基準値より外れたとして、 警告を、 その理由を示す情報、 即ちエラーメッ セージと共に、 表示装置 2 0とプリンタ 2 2に出力する。 The check section 18 receives the current measurement value from the measured value input section 12 and receives the pass / fail ward pass / fail criterion value for each consultation department and ward department from the clinic / ward department pass / fail check reference value setting section 16. Perform single item upper / lower limit check, delta check, and inter-item check. The single item upper / lower limit check is based on the upper limit of the relevant department and the ward department that the current measurement value entered from the measurement value input section 1 and 2 is set by the clinic department And whether the current measured value is smaller than the lower limit of the relevant department or ward set by the department / ward department compliance check reference value setting unit 16 The check section 18 warns that if the current measurement value is greater than the upper limit value or if the current measurement value is smaller than the lower limit value, the current measurement value deviates from the check reference value. Is output to the display device 20 and the printer 22 together with information indicating the reason, that is, an error message.
デルタチェックは、 測定値入力部 1 2より入力された今回の測定値とデータべ ース記憶部 1 4に格納されている前回測定値との差 (今回値 -前回値) が受診科 ·病棟科別適否チ ック基準値設定部 1 6が設定した該当する受診科 ·病棟科の 上昇限界値あるいは下降限界値以内であるか否かの判別によって行われ、 チエツ ク部 1 8は、 限界値以上であれば、 今回の測定値がチェック基準値より外れたと して、 警告を、 その理由を示す情報、 即ちエラーメッセージと共に、 表示装置 2 0とプリン夕 2 2に出力する。 In the delta check, the difference between the current measurement value input from the measurement value input unit 12 and the previous measurement value stored in the database storage unit 14 (this value-the previous value) is determined by the consultation department and ward. It is determined by whether or not it is within the ascending or descending limit value of the relevant consultation department / ward department set by the departmental appropriateness check reference value setting section 16.The check section 18 is limited If the value is equal to or greater than the value, the current measurement value is deviated from the check reference value, and a warning is output to the display device 20 and the printer 22 together with information indicating the reason, that is, an error message.
なお、 デルタチヱックは、 今回値一前回値の差値が正符号である場合には、 上 昇変化であるから、 その差値が上昇限界値以内であるか否の判別を行い、 これに 対し今回値一前回値の差値が負符号である場合には、 減少変化であるから、 その 差値が下降限界値以内であるか否の判別を行う。 また、 前回値と今回値との比、 あるいは差と比との組み合わせを用いることによつても、 同様の判別を行うこと ができる。 If the difference between the current value and the previous value is a positive sign, the delta check is an ascending change, so it is determined whether or not the difference value is within the ascending limit value. If the difference between the value and the previous value is a minus sign, it is a decreasing change, It is determined whether or not the difference value is within the lower limit value. Similar determination can be made by using a ratio between the previous value and the current value, or a combination of the difference and the ratio.
項目間チ ックは、 測定値入力部 1 2より入力された相関性がある 2つの検査 項目の今回の測定値と受診科 ·病棟科別適否チ ック基準値設定部 1 6が設定し た該当する受診科 ·病棟科の項目間チ ック用の限界値の比較により行われ、 チ ック部 1 8は、 今回の測定値が限界値を超えていれば、 今回の測定値がチエツ ク基準値より外れたとして、 警告を、 その理由を示す情報、 即ちエラ一メッセ一 ジと共に、 表示装置 2 0とプリン夕 2 2に出力する。 The inter-item chips are set by the current measurement values of the two test items that have a correlation from the measurement value input unit 12 and the check reference value setting unit 16 by the consultation department / ward department. This is done by comparing the threshold values for tips between the relevant consultation departments and ward departments, and if the current measurement value exceeds the limit value, If the value exceeds the check reference value, a warning is output to the display device 20 and the printer 22 together with information indicating the reason, that is, an error message.
つぎに、 本実施の形態の臨床検査分析装置の動作を、 第 3図に示すフローチヤ 一トを参照して詳細に説明する。 Next, the operation of the clinical test analyzer according to the present embodiment will be described in detail with reference to a flowchart shown in FIG.
まず、 今回の測定値を測定値入力部 1 2より取得し (ステップ S 1 0 ) 、 デー 夕ベース記憶部 1 4より受付情報を取得する (ステップ S 2 0 ) 。 つぎに、 受診 科 ·病棟科別適否チェック基準値設定部 1 6に受診科 ·病棟科別の限界値が定義 されているか否かを判別する (ステップ S 3 0 ) 。 First, the current measured value is obtained from the measured value input unit 12 (step S10), and reception information is obtained from the database storage unit 14 (step S20). Next, it is determined whether or not the limit value for each consultation department / ward department is defined in the consultation department / ward department compliance check reference value setting unit 16 (step S30).
受診科 ·病棟科別の限界値が定義されていない場合には、 受診科 ·病棟科別適 否チ ック基準値設定部 1 6に存在するデフォルト限界値を取得する (ステップ S 4 0 ) 。 これに対し、 受診科 ·病棟科別の限界値が定義されている場合には、 受診科 ·病棟科別適否チ ック基準値設定部 1 6より該当する受診科 ·病棟科の 限界値を取得する (ステップ S 5 0 ) 。 If the limit value for each consultation department and ward department is not defined, the default limit value existing in the consultation department and ward department appropriateness check reference value setting unit 16 is acquired (step S40). . On the other hand, if the limit value for each consultation department and ward department is defined, the limit value for the relevant consultation department and ward department is set from the consultation department and ward department compliance check reference value setting unit 16. Acquire (step S50).
つぎに、 チヱック部 1 8によって、 測定値入力部 1 2よりの今回の測定値と取 得した限界値との比較により、 単項目上下限チェックと、 デルタチェックと、 項 目間チェックとを行う (ステップ S 6 0 ) 。 Next, the check unit 18 compares the current measured value from the measured value input unit 12 with the obtained limit value to perform a single item upper / lower limit check, a delta check, and a check between items. (Step S60).
最後に、 それらのチェック結果を表示装置 2 0に画面表示し、 チ ックリスト をプリンタ 2 2によって印刷し、 これらの情報を履歴情報としてログファイル記 憶部 2 4に出力する (ステップ S 7 0 ) 。 Finally, the check results are displayed on the display device 20 on a screen, the check list is printed by the printer 22, and the information is output to the log file storage unit 24 as history information (step S 70). .
以上説明したように、 本実施の形態の臨床検査分析装置では、 前回の測定日お よび今回の測定日から経過日数を算出し、 この経過日数と前回値に基づレ、て単項 目チエツク、 デルタチヱックおよび項目間チェックにおけるチエツク基準値を受 診科あるいは病棟科別に設定し、 この受診科あるいは病棟科別のチェック基準値 に基づレ、て今回値を評価するので、 検査項目毎の検查結果デー夕の傾向を評価判 断に反映させることができ、 結果として、 検査のヒッ ト率を向上させ、 より信頼 性の高い検査結果を得ることができる。 As described above, the clinical test analyzer according to the present embodiment uses the date of the last measurement. Calculate the number of days elapsed from the measurement date and the current measurement date, and set the reference values for single-item check, delta check, and item-to-item check based on the number of days elapsed and the previous value for each consultation department or ward department. Since the current value is evaluated based on the check reference value for each department or ward, the tendency of the test result data for each test item can be reflected in the evaluation judgment, and as a result, the The inspection rate can be improved and more reliable inspection results can be obtained.
以上のように、 この発明にかかる臨床検查分析装置によれば、 記憶手段に記憶 されている同一被検者の前回の検査日よりの経過日数と同一受診科あるいは同一 病棟科に属する測定値より受診科別あるいは病棟科別に測定値の適否チニック基 準値を設定するから、 検査項目毎の検査結果データの受診科あるいは病棟科毎の 傾向を評価判断に反映させることができ、 結果として、 検査のヒット率を向上で き、 より信頼性の高い検査結果を得ることができる。 As described above, according to the clinical test analyzer according to the present invention, the number of days that have elapsed since the previous examination date of the same subject and the measurement values belonging to the same consultation department or the same ward department stored in the storage means Since the criteria for the appropriateness of the measurement values are set for each consultation department or ward department, the tendency of the examination department or ward department of the test result data for each test item can be reflected in the evaluation judgment, and as a result, The hit rate of inspection can be improved, and more reliable inspection results can be obtained.
また、 この発明にかかる臨床検査分析装置によれば、 前記チェック基準値が、 許容される測定値の上限値と下限値、 即ち単項目チェックの限界値であり、 この 単項目チヱックの限界値の設定に関して検査項目毎の検查結果データの受診科あ るいは病棟科毎の傾向が反映し、 結果として、 検査のヒッ ト率を向上でき、 より 信頼性の高い検査結果を得ることができる。 Further, according to the clinical test analyzer of the present invention, the check reference value is an upper limit value and a lower limit value of an allowable measurement value, that is, a limit value of a single item check, and a limit value of the single item check. With regard to the setting, the tendency of the examination department or ward department of the examination result data of each examination item is reflected, and as a result, the hit rate of examination can be improved, and more reliable examination results can be obtained.
また、 この発明にかかる臨床検査分析装置によれば、 前記チェック基準値が、 今回値の前回値に対する差および/または比について、 許容し得る限界値、 即ち デルタチヱックの限界値であり、 このデルタチェックの限界値の設定に関して検 查項目毎の検査結果データの受診科あるいは病棟科毎の傾向が反映し、 結果とし て検査のヒッ ト率を向上でき、 より信頼性の高い検査結果を得ることができる。 また、 この発明にかかる臨床検査分析装置によれば、 同一受診科あるいは同一 病棟のもので、 同一検査項目の同一経過日数のものにおける全測定値にっレ、て同 一測定値毎あるレ、は所定測定値幅毎に、 前回の測定値と今回の測定値との度数分 布デー夕あるいは散布デ一夕を取得することが行われ、 この度数分布デ一夕ある レ、は散布データより同一測定値毎あるいは所定測定値幅毎にデルタチェックの限 界値が設定されるから、 デルタチェックの限界値の設定に関して検査項目毎の検 査結果デー夕の受診科あるレ、は病棟科毎の傾向が統計学的に的確に反映し、 結果 として、 検査のヒット率を向上でき、 より信頼性の高い検査結果を得ることがで きる。 According to the clinical test analyzer of the present invention, the check reference value is an allowable limit value of a difference and / or a ratio of a current value to a previous value, that is, a limit value of a delta check. As regards the setting of the limit value, the tendency of the examination result data for each examination department or ward department in the examination result data is reflected, and as a result, the test hit rate can be improved and more reliable examination results can be obtained. it can. Further, according to the clinical test analyzer according to the present invention, all the measured values for the same examination department or the same ward and for the same elapsed days of the same test item, and for each of the same measured values, Is used to obtain frequency distribution data or scatter data between the previous measurement value and the current measurement value for each predetermined measurement value width. Limitation of delta check for each measured value or specified measured value width Since the threshold value is set, the trend of each ward department is statistically accurately reflected in the setting of the delta check, and the trend of each ward department on the test result data for each test item is as follows. The inspection hit rate can be improved, and more reliable inspection results can be obtained.
また、 この発明にかかる臨床検查分析装置によれば、 同一受診科あるいは同一 病棟科毎に他の検査項目との相関関係を考慮して適否チ ック基準値を設定する から、 項目間チ ックの限界値の設定に関して検査項目毎の検査結果デ一タの受 診科あるいは病棟科毎の傾向が統計学的に的確に反映し、 結果として、 検査のヒ ット率を向上でき、 より信頼性の高い検査結果を得ることができる。 産業上の利用分野 Further, according to the clinical test analyzer according to the present invention, the pass / fail check reference value is set in consideration of the correlation with other test items for the same consultation department or the same ward department. Regarding the setting of the limit value of the check, the tendency of the test result data of each test item for each consultation department or ward department is statistically accurately reflected, and as a result, the hit rate of the test can be improved, More reliable test results can be obtained. Industrial applications
以上のように、 本発明にかかる臨床検査分析装置は、 前回値チェック等の個別 管理手法による検査異常チェックにおける適否チェック基準値を、 個別に設定す ることで、 検査のヒット率を、 より一層高めるのに有用であり、 特に、 内科、 リ ュ一マチ科、 外科等に応じて、 信憑性の高レ、測定値をもつて信頼性の高し、検査結 果を得るのに適している。 As described above, the clinical test analyzer according to the present invention further improves the hit rate of the test by individually setting the suitability check reference value in the test abnormality check by the individual management method such as the previous value check. It is especially useful for internal medicine, rheumatology, surgery, etc., and is suitable for obtaining high test results, high credibility, and high reliability with measured values. .
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP9/201965 | 1997-07-28 | ||
| JP20196597A JPH1145302A (en) | 1997-07-28 | 1997-07-28 | Clinical laboratory analyzer |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO1999005634A1 true WO1999005634A1 (en) | 1999-02-04 |
Family
ID=16449706
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP1998/001008 Ceased WO1999005634A1 (en) | 1997-07-28 | 1998-03-11 | Clinical examination analyzer |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH1145302A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1999005634A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002090370A (en) * | 2000-09-12 | 2002-03-27 | A & T:Kk | Test result verification server of the sample test system |
| JP4240903B2 (en) * | 2002-04-16 | 2009-03-18 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Infectious disease monitoring method and monitoring system |
| JP4805709B2 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2011-11-02 | シスメックス株式会社 | Urine analyzer |
| JP2009193148A (en) * | 2008-02-12 | 2009-08-27 | A & T Corp | Medical information processing method, medical information processing program, and medical information processor |
| JP5219700B2 (en) * | 2008-09-01 | 2013-06-26 | オムロンヘルスケア株式会社 | Biometric index management device |
| JP4872103B2 (en) * | 2009-02-05 | 2012-02-08 | 国立大学法人 大分大学 | Clinical laboratory value management apparatus, management method, and management program |
| US9809454B2 (en) * | 2014-10-24 | 2017-11-07 | Japan Pionics Co., Ltd. | Method for refining hydrogen |
| JP6482965B2 (en) * | 2015-06-25 | 2019-03-13 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Data analysis system and data analysis method |
| JP6786315B2 (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2020-11-18 | キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 | Hospital information system and examination necessity judgment support program |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH08147396A (en) * | 1994-09-22 | 1996-06-07 | A & T:Kk | Clinical laboratory analyzer |
-
1997
- 1997-07-28 JP JP20196597A patent/JPH1145302A/en active Pending
-
1998
- 1998-03-11 WO PCT/JP1998/001008 patent/WO1999005634A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH08147396A (en) * | 1994-09-22 | 1996-06-07 | A & T:Kk | Clinical laboratory analyzer |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| HOSOGAKI KUME, "Logic Check for Reliability Assurance (in Japanese)", JOURNAL OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, Vol. 37, No. 11, 30 October 1993, p. 69-73. * |
| IIDA, "Data Processing Futurology - Report, Analysis and Storage of Examination Results Control of Hematorogical Exmanination (in Japanese)", JOURNAL OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, Vol. 37, No. 9, 15 September 1993, p. 957-965. * |
| MIURA YOSHIDA, "Re Examination of Problem of Normal Values in Consideration of Results of Nationwide Questionnaring on University Hospitals (in Japanese)", THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, Vol. 40, No. 8, 25 August 1992, p. 811-819. * |
| TATSUMI TAKUBO, "Accuracy Control Internal Accuracy Control of Hematorogical Examination (in Japanese)", THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, SPECIAL EXTRA ISSUE ON SPECIFIED THEME, Vol. 97, 30 July 1994, p. 408-411. * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH1145302A (en) | 1999-02-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US7027931B1 (en) | System for statistical analysis of quality control data | |
| Junker et al. | Point-of-care testing in hospitals and primary care | |
| Plebani et al. | Quality indicators for the total testing process | |
| Karlsson et al. | Assumption testing in population pharmacokinetic models: illustrated with an analysis of moxonidine data from congestive heart failure patients | |
| Westgard | Managing quality vs. measuring uncertainty in the medical laboratory | |
| Plebani et al. | Laboratory network of excellence: enhancing patient safety and service effectiveness | |
| Rishniw et al. | The quality of veterinary in‐clinic and reference laboratory biochemical testing | |
| CN107690583B (en) | System and method for ensuring quality compliance of point-of-care single-use testing devices | |
| US20030097238A1 (en) | Method for automated exception-based quality control compliance for point-of-care devices | |
| CN109557292A (en) | Calibration method | |
| WO2002003077A1 (en) | Clinical examination system | |
| US20190120865A1 (en) | Using patient risk in analysis of quality control strategy for lab results | |
| JP2828609B2 (en) | Clinical laboratory analyzer | |
| WO1999005634A1 (en) | Clinical examination analyzer | |
| Giannoli et al. | Recommendations for the application and follow-up of quality controls in medical laboratories | |
| McKechnie et al. | Considerations when choosing a statistical method for data analysis | |
| Garcia | Quality management | |
| Crane et al. | Diabetes case identification methods applied to electronic medical record systems: their use in HIV-infected patients | |
| US8160818B2 (en) | System and method for determining clinical equivalence of test methods | |
| JP2006031264A (en) | Clinical inspection information control device, clinical inspection information control method, and clinical inspection information control program | |
| CN113921128A (en) | Automatic medical detection data software auditing method and electronic equipment | |
| Gardiner et al. | International Committee for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH) Guidance on the Validation of Laboratory Developed Tests in Haemostasis | |
| US20200000413A1 (en) | Method and system for automated diagnostics of none-infectious illnesses | |
| RU2289297C2 (en) | Method for evaluating functional state of human central nervous system (fscns) | |
| Steindel et al. | Quality control practices for calcium, cholesterol, digoxin, and hemoglobin: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study in 505 hospital laboratories |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): KR US |
|
| AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
|
| DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: KR |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |