US20130152503A1 - Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air - Google Patents
Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20130152503A1 US20130152503A1 US13/714,251 US201213714251A US2013152503A1 US 20130152503 A1 US20130152503 A1 US 20130152503A1 US 201213714251 A US201213714251 A US 201213714251A US 2013152503 A1 US2013152503 A1 US 2013152503A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- building
- contaminants
- novolac
- air space
- interior air
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 26
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 title claims abstract description 13
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 13
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 239000004567 concrete Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 229920003986 novolac Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 229920006334 epoxy coating Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 125000000391 vinyl group Chemical group [H]C([*])=C([H])[H] 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 229920002554 vinyl polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 239000012855 volatile organic compound Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N Benzene Chemical compound C1=CC=CC=C1 UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 9
- YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Toluene Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC=C1 YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- IISBACLAFKSPIT-UHFFFAOYSA-N bisphenol A Chemical compound C=1C=C(O)C=CC=1C(C)(C)C1=CC=C(O)C=C1 IISBACLAFKSPIT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- PXKLMJQFEQBVLD-UHFFFAOYSA-N bisphenol F Chemical compound C1=CC(O)=CC=C1CC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 PXKLMJQFEQBVLD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000012466 permeate Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- YNQLUTRBYVCPMQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethylbenzene Chemical compound CCC1=CC=CC=C1 YNQLUTRBYVCPMQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- -1 tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene Chemical group 0.000 claims description 3
- BZHJMEDXRYGGRV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Vinyl chloride Chemical compound ClC=C BZHJMEDXRYGGRV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000003738 xylenes Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000699 topical effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 abstract description 19
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 abstract description 14
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 abstract description 9
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000004381 surface treatment Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009408 flooring Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000004593 Epoxy Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003570 air Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002290 gas chromatography-mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- CYTYCFOTNPOANT-UHFFFAOYSA-N Perchloroethylene Chemical group ClC(Cl)=C(Cl)Cl CYTYCFOTNPOANT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005422 blasting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000711 cancerogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000315 carcinogenic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000481 chemical toxicant Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000011284 combination treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005238 degreasing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010297 mechanical methods and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005226 mechanical processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000004848 polyfunctional curative Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011150 reinforced concrete Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005067 remediation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002791 soaking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003319 supportive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002195 synergetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229950011008 tetrachloroethylene Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003440 toxic substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010891 toxic waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012808 vapor phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04B—GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS
- E04B1/00—Constructions in general; Structures which are not restricted either to walls, e.g. partitions, or floors or ceilings or roofs
- E04B1/62—Insulation or other protection; Elements or use of specified material therefor
- E04B1/92—Protection against other undesired influences or dangers
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
- E04F15/00—Flooring
- E04F15/12—Flooring or floor layers made of masses in situ, e.g. seamless magnesite floors, terrazzo gypsum floors
Definitions
- the present invention is directed to methods for preventing the intrusion of toxic and/or carcinogenic vapors that can permeate through the foundation and flooring of buildings and subsequently pose a potential health risk.
- the methods of the present invention are operative to prevent the infiltration of vapors generated from a contamination source beneath the foundation and flooring of buildings that, per conventional practices, cannot be easily accessed and/or effectively removed.
- the present invention specifically addresses and alleviates the above-identified deficiencies in the art.
- the present invention is directed to means of protecting the quality and safety of indoor air from toxic contaminant vapors in underlying soil and groundwater.
- this invention provides a synergistic chemical resistance by absorbing a first coating into the concrete forming the foundation of a building and which rests upon a toxic contaminant source whereby the material inhibits chemical permeation within the concrete.
- the invention assists adhesion of a continuous second coating (or topcoat) chemical barrier.
- the first coating applied to the concrete comprises a two-part resin-based epoxy coating, such as novolac, vinyl novolac, or other chemically-resistant two-part Bisphenol A or Bisphenol F-based epoxy system (i.e., resin and hardener) as known in the art.
- the first coating material is of a thin consistency, capable of soaking into the concrete, and is applied in a single coat.
- the topcoat is applied in one or more applications to yield a continuous, chemically-resistant epoxy barrier.
- the first coating may be applied having a thickness from 5-20 mil in thickness followed by a topcoat of 5-150 mil, preferably 10-40 mil.
- the combination treatment results in a concrete that has chemical-resistant properties and a strongly-adhered chemically resistant barrier that inhibits both diffusion and advection of contaminated air and contaminants into the building.
- coatings are operative to provide protection against a wide variety of contaminants that would otherwise be operative to vaporize from beneath the foundation, rise up therethrough and provide a source of contamination.
- the present invention will be specifically directed to a variety of organic compounds that are capable of and in fact easily transition to a vapor phase, and include such well known contaminants as tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, benzene, toluene, and a wide variety of volatile organic compounds.
- the methods of the present invention are operative to not only provide a protective barrier, but should do so for the life of the building or until physical wear requires repair and/or replacement of the foundation or the coating system.
- FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a building having a concrete foundation that defines an interior air space and wherein the foundation is built upon a source of contaminants operative to defuse through the foundation and contaminate the interior air space.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating the steps necessary for performing the methods of the present invention, as per a preferred embodiment.
- FIG. 1 there is illustrated a structure 10 having sidewalls 20 , 30 and ceiling 40 and defining an interior air space 50 .
- the building 10 is built upon foundation 60 , the latter of which will typically comprise a slab of concrete or reinforced concrete, which may or may not include additional supportive structure such as rebar and the like, that, as is well-known to those skilled in the art, that defines a planar surface upon which the structure 10 is built.
- the building 10 as shown is further built upon an area of land 70 that includes contaminants represented as 80 .
- contaminants which for purposes of the present invention will include any organic contaminant operative to permeate through the slab 60 , are indicated by the letter “A”, and thus create contamination in the air space 50 .
- the initial step 120 comprises determining the presence of contamination under an existing structure.
- contaminants would typically have been deposited, spilled, or otherwise released into soil and groundwater accidentally or intentionally in the course of industrial activity, including manufacturing, degreasing, or as a result of leaks from pipes or storage tanks for fuels or chemicals.
- Identification and quantification of contamination under a structure would be accomplished by standard methods for environmental soil, groundwater, and air analyses from samples collected below or adjacent to the existing structure. These methods include systematic sampling of soil, water, and air, followed by analysis by standardized methods, e.g. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS).
- GC-MS Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
- the present invention is exceptionally effective in preventing toxic contaminant vapors that are organic in nature.
- this invention provides protection from commonly encountered contaminants including tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene isomers, vinyl chloride, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene isomers, and other chlorinated and petroleum VOCs (volatile organic compounds).
- the floor surface is then prepared to accept a chemically-resistant treatment agent and topcoat at step 130 .
- the floor should be swept clean of any dirt and debris. Additional preparation that increases the ability of the coating to permeate and adhere to the floor includes roughing the surface of the concrete. This can be accomplished by mechanical grinding, bead blasting, or similar mechanical processes that roughen the surface of the concrete.
- a thin coating of material is applied upon the top layer of concrete foundation that imparts chemical resistance in the concrete.
- exemplary of such materials include novolac, vinyl novolac, and related Bisphenol A or Bisphenol F resin-based epoxy coatings.
- such coating should be applied to a thickness from between 5-20 mil with 5-10 being preferred, that is relatively thin and absorbs into concrete. Such coating is thereafter allowed to dry.
- a second layer is applied of any of the aforementioned materials, namely novolac, vinyl novolac or related resin-based two-part epoxy coatings.
- such second layer is applied in a thickness from between 10-40 mil for a balance of cost and efficacy.
- lower thickness limits are defined by minimum performance requirements whereby the upper thickness limits are defined by cost and practicality.
- the diffusion coefficient for target contaminants in the topcoat material is preferably ⁇ 1.0 ⁇ 10-12 m2/sec.
- the diffusion coefficient and the thickness of the topcoat should be selected such that steady-state indoor air contaminant concentration will be ⁇ 10% of the regulatory allowable limit, based on industry standard modeling (e.g. the Johnson-Ettinger Model) for indoor air contamination.
- industry standard modeling e.g. the Johnson-Ettinger Model
- One skilled in the art will be farmiliar with modeling of indoor air contamination by various available methods, including the Johnson-Ettinger model. These models use multiple input parameters to calculate the amount of contaminant in building air relative to the amount present beneath the building. Using these methods, along with chemical diffusion coefficients for the coating system, one can calculate the level or protection provided by a topcoat of a given thickness.
- the coatings are allowed to dry forming a protective barrier whereby the process ends at 160 .
- the coatings are expected to last the life of the building, or until physical wear requires repair or replacement.
- the above description is given by way of example, and not limitation. Given the above disclosure, one skilled in the art could devise variations that are within the scope and spirit of the invention disclosed herein, including various ways of preventing intrusion of toxic vapors into a building's interior air space.
- the materials applied to the concrete foundation may be applied by any of a variety of techniques well-known in the art, such as by rolling, spraying, and the like.
- the various features of the embodiments disclosed herein can be used alone, or in varying combinations with each other and are not intended to be limited to the specific combination described herein. Thus, the scope of the claims is not to be limited by the illustrated embodiments.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Building Environments (AREA)
Abstract
Methods of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into a building's interior air space. Contaminants operative to diffuse through a building's foundation and contaminate a building's interior air space are first determined. Once identified, the building's foundation, typically formed of concrete, will first be prepared for surface treatment followed by an application of at least one coating of a material suitable for imparting chemical resistance in the concrete. Such material may include novolac, vinyl novolac and related resin-based epoxy coatings. Such coatings, once applied, provide a protective barrier from commonly encountered contaminants, including a wide variety of volatile organic compounds. Such coatings are further expected to last the life of the building, or until physical wear requires repair or replacement.
Description
- This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/576,546, entitled METHOD OF PREVENTING INTRUSION OF TOXIC VAPOR INTO INDOOR AIR, filed on Dec. 16, 2011, all of the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- Not Applicable
- The present invention is directed to methods for preventing the intrusion of toxic and/or carcinogenic vapors that can permeate through the foundation and flooring of buildings and subsequently pose a potential health risk. In this regard, the methods of the present invention are operative to prevent the infiltration of vapors generated from a contamination source beneath the foundation and flooring of buildings that, per conventional practices, cannot be easily accessed and/or effectively removed.
- Historical releases of toxic chemicals into the environment, particularly into soil and groundwater, present an ongoing risk to human health and local ecosystems. In many cases, the contaminated soil and groundwater can be cleaned by in-situ remediation processes, or soil can be dug up, hauled to a toxic waste facility, and clean soil can be applied to fill the hole. These methods are practical and cost effective for many sites, allowing land to be cleaned of toxic contaminants before construction of new buildings on the site.
- However, in some cases contamination has been released or has spread through soil and groundwater and resides under an existing structure. Residual underground contamination (in soil and groundwater) can release toxic vapors to the indoor air of buildings, thus presenting a health risk to the building occupants. Chemical vapors (for example petroleum compounds like benzene or chlorinated solvents including tetrachloroethylene) can enter the building through cracks in concrete flooring or can uniformly permeate through the concrete slab.
- Accordingly, there is a substantial need in the art for a method that can safely and effectively prevent potentially harmful vapors from permeating through the foundation and flooring of an existing building to thus protect the quality and safety of indoor air from toxic contaminant vapors emanating from the underlying soil and groundwater. There is likewise a need in the art for such a method that can be readily deployed, is cost effective and further operative to substantially eradicate the potential threat to human health and potential liability that presently cannot be addressed.
- The present invention specifically addresses and alleviates the above-identified deficiencies in the art. In this regard, the present invention is directed to means of protecting the quality and safety of indoor air from toxic contaminant vapors in underlying soil and groundwater. According to a preferred embodiment, this invention provides a synergistic chemical resistance by absorbing a first coating into the concrete forming the foundation of a building and which rests upon a toxic contaminant source whereby the material inhibits chemical permeation within the concrete. At the same time, the invention assists adhesion of a continuous second coating (or topcoat) chemical barrier. According to a preferred embodiment, the first coating applied to the concrete comprises a two-part resin-based epoxy coating, such as novolac, vinyl novolac, or other chemically-resistant two-part Bisphenol A or Bisphenol F-based epoxy system (i.e., resin and hardener) as known in the art. The first coating material is of a thin consistency, capable of soaking into the concrete, and is applied in a single coat. After curing of the first coating, the topcoat is applied in one or more applications to yield a continuous, chemically-resistant epoxy barrier. In an exemplary application, the first coating may be applied having a thickness from 5-20 mil in thickness followed by a topcoat of 5-150 mil, preferably 10-40 mil.
- The combination treatment results in a concrete that has chemical-resistant properties and a strongly-adhered chemically resistant barrier that inhibits both diffusion and advection of contaminated air and contaminants into the building. In this regard, such coatings are operative to provide protection against a wide variety of contaminants that would otherwise be operative to vaporize from beneath the foundation, rise up therethrough and provide a source of contamination. In this regard, it is contemplated that the present invention will be specifically directed to a variety of organic compounds that are capable of and in fact easily transition to a vapor phase, and include such well known contaminants as tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, benzene, toluene, and a wide variety of volatile organic compounds. Advantageously, the methods of the present invention are operative to not only provide a protective barrier, but should do so for the life of the building or until physical wear requires repair and/or replacement of the foundation or the coating system.
- These and other features and advantages of the various embodiments disclosed herein will be better understood with respect to the following description and drawings, in which like numbers refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a building having a concrete foundation that defines an interior air space and wherein the foundation is built upon a source of contaminants operative to defuse through the foundation and contaminate the interior air space. -
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating the steps necessary for performing the methods of the present invention, as per a preferred embodiment. - The detailed description set forth below is intended as a description of the presently preferred embodiment of the invention, and is not intended to represent the only form in which the present invention may be implemented or performed. The description sets forth the functions and sequences of steps for practicing the invention. It is to be understood, however, that the same or equivalent functions and sequences may be accomplished by different embodiments and they are also intended to be encompassed within the scope of the invention.
- Bearing the foregoing in mind, and referring now to
FIG. 1 , there is illustrated astructure 10 having 20, 30 andsidewalls ceiling 40 and defining aninterior air space 50. - The
building 10 is built uponfoundation 60, the latter of which will typically comprise a slab of concrete or reinforced concrete, which may or may not include additional supportive structure such as rebar and the like, that, as is well-known to those skilled in the art, that defines a planar surface upon which thestructure 10 is built. Thebuilding 10 as shown is further built upon an area ofland 70 that includes contaminants represented as 80. Such contaminants, which for purposes of the present invention will include any organic contaminant operative to permeate through theslab 60, are indicated by the letter “A”, and thus create contamination in theair space 50. - This invention is a method for prevention of permeation of toxic vapors into structures with concrete floors comprising the steps and sequences as set forth in the flow chart diagram of
FIG. 2 . According tosuch method 100, theinitial step 120 comprises determining the presence of contamination under an existing structure. As is well-known in the art, contaminants would typically have been deposited, spilled, or otherwise released into soil and groundwater accidentally or intentionally in the course of industrial activity, including manufacturing, degreasing, or as a result of leaks from pipes or storage tanks for fuels or chemicals. Identification and quantification of contamination under a structure would be accomplished by standard methods for environmental soil, groundwater, and air analyses from samples collected below or adjacent to the existing structure. These methods include systematic sampling of soil, water, and air, followed by analysis by standardized methods, e.g. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). - As discussed above, the present invention is exceptionally effective in preventing toxic contaminant vapors that are organic in nature. Along those lines, this invention provides protection from commonly encountered contaminants including tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene isomers, vinyl chloride, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene isomers, and other chlorinated and petroleum VOCs (volatile organic compounds). Once the presence and degree of contamination of the ground upon which the foundation rests has been determined, in 120, the floor surface is then prepared to accept a chemically-resistant treatment agent and topcoat at
step 130. To prepare the concrete surface for the first coating, the floor should be swept clean of any dirt and debris. Additional preparation that increases the ability of the coating to permeate and adhere to the floor includes roughing the surface of the concrete. This can be accomplished by mechanical grinding, bead blasting, or similar mechanical processes that roughen the surface of the concrete. - Thereafter, in
step 140, a thin coating of material is applied upon the top layer of concrete foundation that imparts chemical resistance in the concrete. Exemplary of such materials include novolac, vinyl novolac, and related Bisphenol A or Bisphenol F resin-based epoxy coatings. In a preferred embodiment, such coating should be applied to a thickness from between 5-20 mil with 5-10 being preferred, that is relatively thin and absorbs into concrete. Such coating is thereafter allowed to dry. - In
step 150, a second layer (topcoat) is applied of any of the aforementioned materials, namely novolac, vinyl novolac or related resin-based two-part epoxy coatings. According to a preferred embodiment such second layer is applied in a thickness from between 10-40 mil for a balance of cost and efficacy. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, lower thickness limits are defined by minimum performance requirements whereby the upper thickness limits are defined by cost and practicality. In all such applications, however, the diffusion coefficient for target contaminants in the topcoat material is preferably ≦1.0×10-12 m2/sec. - Alternatively, the diffusion coefficient and the thickness of the topcoat should be selected such that steady-state indoor air contaminant concentration will be <10% of the regulatory allowable limit, based on industry standard modeling (e.g. the Johnson-Ettinger Model) for indoor air contamination. One skilled in the art will be farmiliar with modeling of indoor air contamination by various available methods, including the Johnson-Ettinger model. These models use multiple input parameters to calculate the amount of contaminant in building air relative to the amount present beneath the building. Using these methods, along with chemical diffusion coefficients for the coating system, one can calculate the level or protection provided by a topcoat of a given thickness.
- Following application of the topcoat, the coatings are allowed to dry forming a protective barrier whereby the process ends at 160. Advantageously, the coatings are expected to last the life of the building, or until physical wear requires repair or replacement.
- The above description is given by way of example, and not limitation. Given the above disclosure, one skilled in the art could devise variations that are within the scope and spirit of the invention disclosed herein, including various ways of preventing intrusion of toxic vapors into a building's interior air space. For example, the materials applied to the concrete foundation may be applied by any of a variety of techniques well-known in the art, such as by rolling, spraying, and the like. Further, the various features of the embodiments disclosed herein can be used alone, or in varying combinations with each other and are not intended to be limited to the specific combination described herein. Thus, the scope of the claims is not to be limited by the illustrated embodiments.
Claims (6)
1. A method for preventing intrusion of toxic contaminants into the interior air space of a building built upon a concrete foundation through which said contaminants permeate and contaminate the interior air space, the method comprising the steps:
a. detecting the presence of contaminants within the building's interior air space or in nearby soil or groundwater;
b. preparing the top surface of the building's concrete foundation for receiving a topical application of a material;
c. applying a first layer of material upon said top surface of said concrete foundation and allowing said first layer to dry;
d. applying a second layer topcoat upon said layer formed in step c), said first and second layers reacting with one another to define a material operative to form a barrier preventing said contaminants from permeating through said foundation and into said interior air space of said building.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein in step a) and d), said materials applied to said concrete foundation chemically resistant two-part epoxy coatings.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein said chemically resistant two-part epoxy coatings are selected from the group consisting of novolac and vinyl novolac.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said first layer is applied to have a thickness from between 5-20 mil and said second layer is applied to have a thickness from between 10-40 mil.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein said material applied for said first and second layers is selected from the group consisting of novolac, vinyl novolac, Bisphenol A resin-based epoxy coatings, and Bisphenol F resin-based epoxy coatings.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein in step a, said contaminant is identified as being a contaminant selected from the group consisting of tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene isomers, vinyl chloride, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene isomers, and other chlorinated and petroleum VOCs (volatile organic compounds).
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13/714,251 US20130152503A1 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2012-12-13 | Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US201161576546P | 2011-12-16 | 2011-12-16 | |
| US13/714,251 US20130152503A1 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2012-12-13 | Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20130152503A1 true US20130152503A1 (en) | 2013-06-20 |
Family
ID=48608709
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13/714,251 Abandoned US20130152503A1 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2012-12-13 | Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20130152503A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112462003A (en) * | 2020-11-25 | 2021-03-09 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Volatile substance detection device and method |
| CN113882624A (en) * | 2020-07-03 | 2022-01-04 | 江西多冠建筑装饰工程有限公司 | Environment-friendly decoration material integration method |
| CN120338486A (en) * | 2025-04-03 | 2025-07-18 | 北京市生态环境保护科学研究院 | A rapid assessment method for vapor intrusion risk based on interface processes |
Citations (33)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SU539045A1 (en) * | 1975-10-14 | 1976-12-15 | Белорусский Политехнический Институт | The method of obtaining epoxy foam |
| US4148950A (en) * | 1978-04-07 | 1979-04-10 | Ameron, Inc. | Epoxy surfacer cements containing polyamine-ketimine mixtures |
| US4460625A (en) * | 1981-07-16 | 1984-07-17 | Rohm And Haas Company | Method of coating and impregnating concrete substrates, and products obtained thereby |
| US4684259A (en) * | 1985-08-05 | 1987-08-04 | Adolph Coors Company | Epoxy mixing and dispensing apparatus |
| US4725097A (en) * | 1985-03-06 | 1988-02-16 | Bartell Industries Limited | Inclined cutter for surface cleaning head |
| US4800128A (en) * | 1986-06-23 | 1989-01-24 | Keramchemie Gmbh | Chemical attack-resistant, liquid-tight lining |
| JPH028456A (en) * | 1988-06-28 | 1990-01-11 | Masaharu Tomae | Method for finishing floor surface |
| US4907386A (en) * | 1988-07-08 | 1990-03-13 | Paul Ekroth | Shield for building foundation |
| JPH02225385A (en) * | 1989-02-28 | 1990-09-07 | Cemedine Co Ltd | Method for forming protection film of concrete material |
| US5024342A (en) * | 1988-11-07 | 1991-06-18 | Dallum Barry J | Corrosion resistant containers |
| US5107642A (en) * | 1989-06-12 | 1992-04-28 | Isola A/S | Arrangement in screening of objects, especially residential houses |
| US5137764A (en) * | 1990-12-06 | 1992-08-11 | Doyle Dennis J | Floor structure incorporating a vapor and gas barrier |
| EP0420924B1 (en) * | 1988-06-20 | 1996-05-15 | Rexam Graphics Limited | Barrier membranes e.g. for use in building |
| DE19601956A1 (en) * | 1995-01-09 | 1996-07-11 | Horn Wolfgang | Sealing method for prevention of dangerous gas entry into buildings |
| DE19620151A1 (en) * | 1995-05-09 | 1996-11-14 | Horn Wolfgang | Polymer seal for preventing passage of dangerous gases and moisture into building from surrounding ground |
| US5618860A (en) * | 1993-05-19 | 1997-04-08 | Ameron International Corporation | Epoxy polysiloxane coating and flooring compositions |
| US5672384A (en) * | 1994-02-10 | 1997-09-30 | Kanngard; Bengt | Method of eliminating moisture problems in housing |
| US5711834A (en) * | 1994-10-28 | 1998-01-27 | Tonen Corporation | Method of reinforcing concrete slab |
| US6066695A (en) * | 1997-02-27 | 2000-05-23 | Roth Werke Gmbh | Method of producing thermoplastic synthetic resin compositions with reduced diffusion coefficients |
| US6543189B1 (en) * | 2000-01-10 | 2003-04-08 | Argent Industrial L.P. | Environmental protection and detection system |
| US6575666B1 (en) * | 2002-06-07 | 2003-06-10 | Lawrence M. Janesky | Crawlspace encapsulation system |
| US6706096B2 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2004-03-16 | Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. | Method and system for protecting buildings from subsurface gases |
| US20060074141A1 (en) * | 2004-10-06 | 2006-04-06 | Tri-E Shielding Technologies, Llc | Techniques and compositions for shielding radioactive energy |
| US20060150555A1 (en) * | 2003-11-19 | 2006-07-13 | Mcinerney Michael K | Embedded barrier to fluid flow |
| US20070077370A1 (en) * | 2005-10-04 | 2007-04-05 | Crosslink Technology Inc. | Gasoline-impermeable coatings |
| US7210992B1 (en) * | 2006-08-16 | 2007-05-01 | Fred Wade | Machine for preparing floors for refinishing |
| US20070095681A1 (en) * | 2005-10-28 | 2007-05-03 | Craig Jones | Epoxy coat kit |
| US20070157533A1 (en) * | 2006-01-11 | 2007-07-12 | Janesky Lawrence M | Capped foundation wall encapsulation system |
| US20090068473A1 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2009-03-12 | Rudolf Wilhelmus Bernardus Van Wessel | Epoxy Based Coatings |
| US7707961B2 (en) * | 2005-08-12 | 2010-05-04 | Tmc-Ip, Llc | Apparatus for applying chemical coatings |
| US20110061334A1 (en) * | 2009-09-14 | 2011-03-17 | Robert Walter Smith | Method and System for Remediating and Covering Wood Floors |
| US20130122208A1 (en) * | 2011-02-14 | 2013-05-16 | Blue Angel Paint and Coatings, Ltd. | Coating Material and Method for Waterproofing a Surface |
| US8898994B1 (en) * | 2011-04-20 | 2014-12-02 | United States Gypsum Company | Method for sealing wood subfloors |
-
2012
- 2012-12-13 US US13/714,251 patent/US20130152503A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (35)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SU539045A1 (en) * | 1975-10-14 | 1976-12-15 | Белорусский Политехнический Институт | The method of obtaining epoxy foam |
| US4148950A (en) * | 1978-04-07 | 1979-04-10 | Ameron, Inc. | Epoxy surfacer cements containing polyamine-ketimine mixtures |
| US4460625A (en) * | 1981-07-16 | 1984-07-17 | Rohm And Haas Company | Method of coating and impregnating concrete substrates, and products obtained thereby |
| US4725097A (en) * | 1985-03-06 | 1988-02-16 | Bartell Industries Limited | Inclined cutter for surface cleaning head |
| US4684259A (en) * | 1985-08-05 | 1987-08-04 | Adolph Coors Company | Epoxy mixing and dispensing apparatus |
| US4800128A (en) * | 1986-06-23 | 1989-01-24 | Keramchemie Gmbh | Chemical attack-resistant, liquid-tight lining |
| EP0420924B1 (en) * | 1988-06-20 | 1996-05-15 | Rexam Graphics Limited | Barrier membranes e.g. for use in building |
| JPH028456A (en) * | 1988-06-28 | 1990-01-11 | Masaharu Tomae | Method for finishing floor surface |
| US4907386A (en) * | 1988-07-08 | 1990-03-13 | Paul Ekroth | Shield for building foundation |
| US5024342A (en) * | 1988-11-07 | 1991-06-18 | Dallum Barry J | Corrosion resistant containers |
| JPH02225385A (en) * | 1989-02-28 | 1990-09-07 | Cemedine Co Ltd | Method for forming protection film of concrete material |
| US5107642A (en) * | 1989-06-12 | 1992-04-28 | Isola A/S | Arrangement in screening of objects, especially residential houses |
| US5137764A (en) * | 1990-12-06 | 1992-08-11 | Doyle Dennis J | Floor structure incorporating a vapor and gas barrier |
| US5618860A (en) * | 1993-05-19 | 1997-04-08 | Ameron International Corporation | Epoxy polysiloxane coating and flooring compositions |
| US5672384A (en) * | 1994-02-10 | 1997-09-30 | Kanngard; Bengt | Method of eliminating moisture problems in housing |
| US5711834A (en) * | 1994-10-28 | 1998-01-27 | Tonen Corporation | Method of reinforcing concrete slab |
| DE19601956A1 (en) * | 1995-01-09 | 1996-07-11 | Horn Wolfgang | Sealing method for prevention of dangerous gas entry into buildings |
| DE19620151A1 (en) * | 1995-05-09 | 1996-11-14 | Horn Wolfgang | Polymer seal for preventing passage of dangerous gases and moisture into building from surrounding ground |
| US6066695A (en) * | 1997-02-27 | 2000-05-23 | Roth Werke Gmbh | Method of producing thermoplastic synthetic resin compositions with reduced diffusion coefficients |
| US6543189B1 (en) * | 2000-01-10 | 2003-04-08 | Argent Industrial L.P. | Environmental protection and detection system |
| US6629390B2 (en) * | 2000-01-10 | 2003-10-07 | Argent Industrial, L.P. | Environmental protection and detection system |
| US6706096B2 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2004-03-16 | Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. | Method and system for protecting buildings from subsurface gases |
| US6575666B1 (en) * | 2002-06-07 | 2003-06-10 | Lawrence M. Janesky | Crawlspace encapsulation system |
| US20080168721A1 (en) * | 2003-11-19 | 2008-07-17 | Mcinerney Michael K | Configuration implementing waterproofing under a concrete surface coat of a concrete floor |
| US20060150555A1 (en) * | 2003-11-19 | 2006-07-13 | Mcinerney Michael K | Embedded barrier to fluid flow |
| US20060074141A1 (en) * | 2004-10-06 | 2006-04-06 | Tri-E Shielding Technologies, Llc | Techniques and compositions for shielding radioactive energy |
| US7707961B2 (en) * | 2005-08-12 | 2010-05-04 | Tmc-Ip, Llc | Apparatus for applying chemical coatings |
| US20070077370A1 (en) * | 2005-10-04 | 2007-04-05 | Crosslink Technology Inc. | Gasoline-impermeable coatings |
| US20070095681A1 (en) * | 2005-10-28 | 2007-05-03 | Craig Jones | Epoxy coat kit |
| US20090068473A1 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2009-03-12 | Rudolf Wilhelmus Bernardus Van Wessel | Epoxy Based Coatings |
| US20070157533A1 (en) * | 2006-01-11 | 2007-07-12 | Janesky Lawrence M | Capped foundation wall encapsulation system |
| US7210992B1 (en) * | 2006-08-16 | 2007-05-01 | Fred Wade | Machine for preparing floors for refinishing |
| US20110061334A1 (en) * | 2009-09-14 | 2011-03-17 | Robert Walter Smith | Method and System for Remediating and Covering Wood Floors |
| US20130122208A1 (en) * | 2011-02-14 | 2013-05-16 | Blue Angel Paint and Coatings, Ltd. | Coating Material and Method for Waterproofing a Surface |
| US8898994B1 (en) * | 2011-04-20 | 2014-12-02 | United States Gypsum Company | Method for sealing wood subfloors |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| Abatement of Hydrocarbon Vapors: DunLap, Lloyd E. "Abatement of hydrocarbon vapors in buildings." Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water. National Water Well Association, Worthington, OH (1984): 504-518. * |
| Coating Guide by ChemCo Systems available at http://www.chemcosystems.com/tech_coatguide.html, with mulitple internet archives including dated 4/13/2009 as verified by the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (last accessed on 9/21/2014). * |
| Epoxy Coatings Guide by Sherwin Williams dated 2008, with earliest internet archive being 7/14/2010 as verified by the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://web.archive.org/web/20100714072703/http://protective.sherwin-williams.com/pdf/Epoxy%20Coatings%20Guide.pdf (last accessed on 9/21/2014). * |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113882624A (en) * | 2020-07-03 | 2022-01-04 | 江西多冠建筑装饰工程有限公司 | Environment-friendly decoration material integration method |
| CN112462003A (en) * | 2020-11-25 | 2021-03-09 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Volatile substance detection device and method |
| CN120338486A (en) * | 2025-04-03 | 2025-07-18 | 北京市生态环境保护科学研究院 | A rapid assessment method for vapor intrusion risk based on interface processes |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Clark et al. | Roofing materials’ contributions to storm-water runoff pollution | |
| Kim et al. | Hazardous materials in buildings | |
| US20130152503A1 (en) | Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air | |
| Wahlström et al. | Hazardous substances in construction products and materials: PARADE. Best practices for Pre-demolition Audits ensuring high quality RAw materials | |
| Vo et al. | Evaluation of sealants to mitigate the release of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from AFFF-impacted concrete: Characterization and forecasting | |
| CN114918241A (en) | In-situ physical-chemical synergistic blocking method for composite contaminated soil | |
| US11220614B2 (en) | Metal-based membranes for vapor intrusion mitigation | |
| US11820897B2 (en) | Vapor mitigation barriers | |
| Huang et al. | Spatial distribution of organic pollutants in industrial construction and demolition waste and their mutual interaction on an abandoned pesticide manufacturing plant | |
| Zaharieva et al. | Pre-demolition audit as a tool for appropriate CDW management–a case study of a public building | |
| Gao et al. | Methamphetamine contamination in residential properties and their remediation in Queensland, Australia | |
| Baig et al. | Modelling the extraction of soil contaminants with supercritical carbon dioxide | |
| US20170174568A1 (en) | Soil Remediation by Molecular Binding for Producing Beneficial Use Determined Polymer Concrete Products | |
| Bellagamba et al. | Remediation activities in an Italian Superfund: case study of an industrial plant in Broni | |
| Junior | CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF LUBRICATING OILS ON CONCRETE FLOORS IN AN INDUSTRIAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AND SUBSEQUENT SOIL CONTAMINATION | |
| Douglas et al. | Assessment of sealants for the mitigation of PFAS leaching from contaminated concrete | |
| Fox et al. | Evaluating factors affecting the permeability of emulsions used to stabilize radioactive contamination from a radiological dispersal device | |
| Charbonneau | Evaluation of Corrective Action Alternatives and Corrective Action Plan: 36-42 Dorset Lane, Williston | |
| Búryová et al. | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF COATED TERRACE FLOORBOARDS | |
| Meyer | Organic Corrosion Inhibitors–New Build And Existing Structures Performance | |
| Minarovičová | THE ENVIRONMETAL ASPECT OF ETICS REGULAR MAINTENANCE | |
| MESCHEDE et al. | in Alexandria, Egypt | |
| Arif et al. | Evaluation of the performance of bituminous geomembranes (BGMs) as vapour barriers | |
| Boestam | Haga Företagscenter-historical and preliminary technical investigation of a contaminated site in Anderstorp, Småland, Sweden | |
| Garettoa et al. | Passive vapour barrier feasibility study: redevelopment of an industrial site to a residential site |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: REGENESIS BIOREMEDIATION PRODUCTS, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MORK, BENJAMIN V.;GRANT, F. PETER;WILSON, SCOTT B.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20121211 TO 20121213;REEL/FRAME:029466/0966 |
|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |