[go: up one dir, main page]

US20130152503A1 - Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air - Google Patents

Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130152503A1
US20130152503A1 US13/714,251 US201213714251A US2013152503A1 US 20130152503 A1 US20130152503 A1 US 20130152503A1 US 201213714251 A US201213714251 A US 201213714251A US 2013152503 A1 US2013152503 A1 US 2013152503A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
building
contaminants
novolac
air space
interior air
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/714,251
Inventor
Benjamin V. Mork
Scott B. Wilson
Ryan Ferguson
F. Peter Grant
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Regenesis Bioremediation Products Inc
Original Assignee
Regenesis Bioremediation Products Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Regenesis Bioremediation Products Inc filed Critical Regenesis Bioremediation Products Inc
Priority to US13/714,251 priority Critical patent/US20130152503A1/en
Assigned to REGENESIS BIOREMEDIATION PRODUCTS reassignment REGENESIS BIOREMEDIATION PRODUCTS ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GRANT, F. PETER, MORK, BENJAMIN V., WILSON, SCOTT B., FERGUSON, RYAN
Publication of US20130152503A1 publication Critical patent/US20130152503A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04BGENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS
    • E04B1/00Constructions in general; Structures which are not restricted either to walls, e.g. partitions, or floors or ceilings or roofs
    • E04B1/62Insulation or other protection; Elements or use of specified material therefor
    • E04B1/92Protection against other undesired influences or dangers
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04FFINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F15/00Flooring
    • E04F15/12Flooring or floor layers made of masses in situ, e.g. seamless magnesite floors, terrazzo gypsum floors

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to methods for preventing the intrusion of toxic and/or carcinogenic vapors that can permeate through the foundation and flooring of buildings and subsequently pose a potential health risk.
  • the methods of the present invention are operative to prevent the infiltration of vapors generated from a contamination source beneath the foundation and flooring of buildings that, per conventional practices, cannot be easily accessed and/or effectively removed.
  • the present invention specifically addresses and alleviates the above-identified deficiencies in the art.
  • the present invention is directed to means of protecting the quality and safety of indoor air from toxic contaminant vapors in underlying soil and groundwater.
  • this invention provides a synergistic chemical resistance by absorbing a first coating into the concrete forming the foundation of a building and which rests upon a toxic contaminant source whereby the material inhibits chemical permeation within the concrete.
  • the invention assists adhesion of a continuous second coating (or topcoat) chemical barrier.
  • the first coating applied to the concrete comprises a two-part resin-based epoxy coating, such as novolac, vinyl novolac, or other chemically-resistant two-part Bisphenol A or Bisphenol F-based epoxy system (i.e., resin and hardener) as known in the art.
  • the first coating material is of a thin consistency, capable of soaking into the concrete, and is applied in a single coat.
  • the topcoat is applied in one or more applications to yield a continuous, chemically-resistant epoxy barrier.
  • the first coating may be applied having a thickness from 5-20 mil in thickness followed by a topcoat of 5-150 mil, preferably 10-40 mil.
  • the combination treatment results in a concrete that has chemical-resistant properties and a strongly-adhered chemically resistant barrier that inhibits both diffusion and advection of contaminated air and contaminants into the building.
  • coatings are operative to provide protection against a wide variety of contaminants that would otherwise be operative to vaporize from beneath the foundation, rise up therethrough and provide a source of contamination.
  • the present invention will be specifically directed to a variety of organic compounds that are capable of and in fact easily transition to a vapor phase, and include such well known contaminants as tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, benzene, toluene, and a wide variety of volatile organic compounds.
  • the methods of the present invention are operative to not only provide a protective barrier, but should do so for the life of the building or until physical wear requires repair and/or replacement of the foundation or the coating system.
  • FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a building having a concrete foundation that defines an interior air space and wherein the foundation is built upon a source of contaminants operative to defuse through the foundation and contaminate the interior air space.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating the steps necessary for performing the methods of the present invention, as per a preferred embodiment.
  • FIG. 1 there is illustrated a structure 10 having sidewalls 20 , 30 and ceiling 40 and defining an interior air space 50 .
  • the building 10 is built upon foundation 60 , the latter of which will typically comprise a slab of concrete or reinforced concrete, which may or may not include additional supportive structure such as rebar and the like, that, as is well-known to those skilled in the art, that defines a planar surface upon which the structure 10 is built.
  • the building 10 as shown is further built upon an area of land 70 that includes contaminants represented as 80 .
  • contaminants which for purposes of the present invention will include any organic contaminant operative to permeate through the slab 60 , are indicated by the letter “A”, and thus create contamination in the air space 50 .
  • the initial step 120 comprises determining the presence of contamination under an existing structure.
  • contaminants would typically have been deposited, spilled, or otherwise released into soil and groundwater accidentally or intentionally in the course of industrial activity, including manufacturing, degreasing, or as a result of leaks from pipes or storage tanks for fuels or chemicals.
  • Identification and quantification of contamination under a structure would be accomplished by standard methods for environmental soil, groundwater, and air analyses from samples collected below or adjacent to the existing structure. These methods include systematic sampling of soil, water, and air, followed by analysis by standardized methods, e.g. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS).
  • GC-MS Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
  • the present invention is exceptionally effective in preventing toxic contaminant vapors that are organic in nature.
  • this invention provides protection from commonly encountered contaminants including tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene isomers, vinyl chloride, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene isomers, and other chlorinated and petroleum VOCs (volatile organic compounds).
  • the floor surface is then prepared to accept a chemically-resistant treatment agent and topcoat at step 130 .
  • the floor should be swept clean of any dirt and debris. Additional preparation that increases the ability of the coating to permeate and adhere to the floor includes roughing the surface of the concrete. This can be accomplished by mechanical grinding, bead blasting, or similar mechanical processes that roughen the surface of the concrete.
  • a thin coating of material is applied upon the top layer of concrete foundation that imparts chemical resistance in the concrete.
  • exemplary of such materials include novolac, vinyl novolac, and related Bisphenol A or Bisphenol F resin-based epoxy coatings.
  • such coating should be applied to a thickness from between 5-20 mil with 5-10 being preferred, that is relatively thin and absorbs into concrete. Such coating is thereafter allowed to dry.
  • a second layer is applied of any of the aforementioned materials, namely novolac, vinyl novolac or related resin-based two-part epoxy coatings.
  • such second layer is applied in a thickness from between 10-40 mil for a balance of cost and efficacy.
  • lower thickness limits are defined by minimum performance requirements whereby the upper thickness limits are defined by cost and practicality.
  • the diffusion coefficient for target contaminants in the topcoat material is preferably ⁇ 1.0 ⁇ 10-12 m2/sec.
  • the diffusion coefficient and the thickness of the topcoat should be selected such that steady-state indoor air contaminant concentration will be ⁇ 10% of the regulatory allowable limit, based on industry standard modeling (e.g. the Johnson-Ettinger Model) for indoor air contamination.
  • industry standard modeling e.g. the Johnson-Ettinger Model
  • One skilled in the art will be farmiliar with modeling of indoor air contamination by various available methods, including the Johnson-Ettinger model. These models use multiple input parameters to calculate the amount of contaminant in building air relative to the amount present beneath the building. Using these methods, along with chemical diffusion coefficients for the coating system, one can calculate the level or protection provided by a topcoat of a given thickness.
  • the coatings are allowed to dry forming a protective barrier whereby the process ends at 160 .
  • the coatings are expected to last the life of the building, or until physical wear requires repair or replacement.
  • the above description is given by way of example, and not limitation. Given the above disclosure, one skilled in the art could devise variations that are within the scope and spirit of the invention disclosed herein, including various ways of preventing intrusion of toxic vapors into a building's interior air space.
  • the materials applied to the concrete foundation may be applied by any of a variety of techniques well-known in the art, such as by rolling, spraying, and the like.
  • the various features of the embodiments disclosed herein can be used alone, or in varying combinations with each other and are not intended to be limited to the specific combination described herein. Thus, the scope of the claims is not to be limited by the illustrated embodiments.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Building Environments (AREA)

Abstract

Methods of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into a building's interior air space. Contaminants operative to diffuse through a building's foundation and contaminate a building's interior air space are first determined. Once identified, the building's foundation, typically formed of concrete, will first be prepared for surface treatment followed by an application of at least one coating of a material suitable for imparting chemical resistance in the concrete. Such material may include novolac, vinyl novolac and related resin-based epoxy coatings. Such coatings, once applied, provide a protective barrier from commonly encountered contaminants, including a wide variety of volatile organic compounds. Such coatings are further expected to last the life of the building, or until physical wear requires repair or replacement.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/576,546, entitled METHOD OF PREVENTING INTRUSION OF TOXIC VAPOR INTO INDOOR AIR, filed on Dec. 16, 2011, all of the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • STATEMENT RE: FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENT
  • Not Applicable
  • BACKGROUND
  • The present invention is directed to methods for preventing the intrusion of toxic and/or carcinogenic vapors that can permeate through the foundation and flooring of buildings and subsequently pose a potential health risk. In this regard, the methods of the present invention are operative to prevent the infiltration of vapors generated from a contamination source beneath the foundation and flooring of buildings that, per conventional practices, cannot be easily accessed and/or effectively removed.
  • Historical releases of toxic chemicals into the environment, particularly into soil and groundwater, present an ongoing risk to human health and local ecosystems. In many cases, the contaminated soil and groundwater can be cleaned by in-situ remediation processes, or soil can be dug up, hauled to a toxic waste facility, and clean soil can be applied to fill the hole. These methods are practical and cost effective for many sites, allowing land to be cleaned of toxic contaminants before construction of new buildings on the site.
  • However, in some cases contamination has been released or has spread through soil and groundwater and resides under an existing structure. Residual underground contamination (in soil and groundwater) can release toxic vapors to the indoor air of buildings, thus presenting a health risk to the building occupants. Chemical vapors (for example petroleum compounds like benzene or chlorinated solvents including tetrachloroethylene) can enter the building through cracks in concrete flooring or can uniformly permeate through the concrete slab.
  • Accordingly, there is a substantial need in the art for a method that can safely and effectively prevent potentially harmful vapors from permeating through the foundation and flooring of an existing building to thus protect the quality and safety of indoor air from toxic contaminant vapors emanating from the underlying soil and groundwater. There is likewise a need in the art for such a method that can be readily deployed, is cost effective and further operative to substantially eradicate the potential threat to human health and potential liability that presently cannot be addressed.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY
  • The present invention specifically addresses and alleviates the above-identified deficiencies in the art. In this regard, the present invention is directed to means of protecting the quality and safety of indoor air from toxic contaminant vapors in underlying soil and groundwater. According to a preferred embodiment, this invention provides a synergistic chemical resistance by absorbing a first coating into the concrete forming the foundation of a building and which rests upon a toxic contaminant source whereby the material inhibits chemical permeation within the concrete. At the same time, the invention assists adhesion of a continuous second coating (or topcoat) chemical barrier. According to a preferred embodiment, the first coating applied to the concrete comprises a two-part resin-based epoxy coating, such as novolac, vinyl novolac, or other chemically-resistant two-part Bisphenol A or Bisphenol F-based epoxy system (i.e., resin and hardener) as known in the art. The first coating material is of a thin consistency, capable of soaking into the concrete, and is applied in a single coat. After curing of the first coating, the topcoat is applied in one or more applications to yield a continuous, chemically-resistant epoxy barrier. In an exemplary application, the first coating may be applied having a thickness from 5-20 mil in thickness followed by a topcoat of 5-150 mil, preferably 10-40 mil.
  • The combination treatment results in a concrete that has chemical-resistant properties and a strongly-adhered chemically resistant barrier that inhibits both diffusion and advection of contaminated air and contaminants into the building. In this regard, such coatings are operative to provide protection against a wide variety of contaminants that would otherwise be operative to vaporize from beneath the foundation, rise up therethrough and provide a source of contamination. In this regard, it is contemplated that the present invention will be specifically directed to a variety of organic compounds that are capable of and in fact easily transition to a vapor phase, and include such well known contaminants as tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, benzene, toluene, and a wide variety of volatile organic compounds. Advantageously, the methods of the present invention are operative to not only provide a protective barrier, but should do so for the life of the building or until physical wear requires repair and/or replacement of the foundation or the coating system.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • These and other features and advantages of the various embodiments disclosed herein will be better understood with respect to the following description and drawings, in which like numbers refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a building having a concrete foundation that defines an interior air space and wherein the foundation is built upon a source of contaminants operative to defuse through the foundation and contaminate the interior air space.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating the steps necessary for performing the methods of the present invention, as per a preferred embodiment.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The detailed description set forth below is intended as a description of the presently preferred embodiment of the invention, and is not intended to represent the only form in which the present invention may be implemented or performed. The description sets forth the functions and sequences of steps for practicing the invention. It is to be understood, however, that the same or equivalent functions and sequences may be accomplished by different embodiments and they are also intended to be encompassed within the scope of the invention.
  • Bearing the foregoing in mind, and referring now to FIG. 1, there is illustrated a structure 10 having sidewalls 20, 30 and ceiling 40 and defining an interior air space 50.
  • The building 10 is built upon foundation 60, the latter of which will typically comprise a slab of concrete or reinforced concrete, which may or may not include additional supportive structure such as rebar and the like, that, as is well-known to those skilled in the art, that defines a planar surface upon which the structure 10 is built. The building 10 as shown is further built upon an area of land 70 that includes contaminants represented as 80. Such contaminants, which for purposes of the present invention will include any organic contaminant operative to permeate through the slab 60, are indicated by the letter “A”, and thus create contamination in the air space 50.
  • This invention is a method for prevention of permeation of toxic vapors into structures with concrete floors comprising the steps and sequences as set forth in the flow chart diagram of FIG. 2. According to such method 100, the initial step 120 comprises determining the presence of contamination under an existing structure. As is well-known in the art, contaminants would typically have been deposited, spilled, or otherwise released into soil and groundwater accidentally or intentionally in the course of industrial activity, including manufacturing, degreasing, or as a result of leaks from pipes or storage tanks for fuels or chemicals. Identification and quantification of contamination under a structure would be accomplished by standard methods for environmental soil, groundwater, and air analyses from samples collected below or adjacent to the existing structure. These methods include systematic sampling of soil, water, and air, followed by analysis by standardized methods, e.g. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS).
  • As discussed above, the present invention is exceptionally effective in preventing toxic contaminant vapors that are organic in nature. Along those lines, this invention provides protection from commonly encountered contaminants including tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene isomers, vinyl chloride, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene isomers, and other chlorinated and petroleum VOCs (volatile organic compounds). Once the presence and degree of contamination of the ground upon which the foundation rests has been determined, in 120, the floor surface is then prepared to accept a chemically-resistant treatment agent and topcoat at step 130. To prepare the concrete surface for the first coating, the floor should be swept clean of any dirt and debris. Additional preparation that increases the ability of the coating to permeate and adhere to the floor includes roughing the surface of the concrete. This can be accomplished by mechanical grinding, bead blasting, or similar mechanical processes that roughen the surface of the concrete.
  • Thereafter, in step 140, a thin coating of material is applied upon the top layer of concrete foundation that imparts chemical resistance in the concrete. Exemplary of such materials include novolac, vinyl novolac, and related Bisphenol A or Bisphenol F resin-based epoxy coatings. In a preferred embodiment, such coating should be applied to a thickness from between 5-20 mil with 5-10 being preferred, that is relatively thin and absorbs into concrete. Such coating is thereafter allowed to dry.
  • In step 150, a second layer (topcoat) is applied of any of the aforementioned materials, namely novolac, vinyl novolac or related resin-based two-part epoxy coatings. According to a preferred embodiment such second layer is applied in a thickness from between 10-40 mil for a balance of cost and efficacy. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, lower thickness limits are defined by minimum performance requirements whereby the upper thickness limits are defined by cost and practicality. In all such applications, however, the diffusion coefficient for target contaminants in the topcoat material is preferably ≦1.0×10-12 m2/sec.
  • Alternatively, the diffusion coefficient and the thickness of the topcoat should be selected such that steady-state indoor air contaminant concentration will be <10% of the regulatory allowable limit, based on industry standard modeling (e.g. the Johnson-Ettinger Model) for indoor air contamination. One skilled in the art will be farmiliar with modeling of indoor air contamination by various available methods, including the Johnson-Ettinger model. These models use multiple input parameters to calculate the amount of contaminant in building air relative to the amount present beneath the building. Using these methods, along with chemical diffusion coefficients for the coating system, one can calculate the level or protection provided by a topcoat of a given thickness.
  • Following application of the topcoat, the coatings are allowed to dry forming a protective barrier whereby the process ends at 160. Advantageously, the coatings are expected to last the life of the building, or until physical wear requires repair or replacement.
  • The above description is given by way of example, and not limitation. Given the above disclosure, one skilled in the art could devise variations that are within the scope and spirit of the invention disclosed herein, including various ways of preventing intrusion of toxic vapors into a building's interior air space. For example, the materials applied to the concrete foundation may be applied by any of a variety of techniques well-known in the art, such as by rolling, spraying, and the like. Further, the various features of the embodiments disclosed herein can be used alone, or in varying combinations with each other and are not intended to be limited to the specific combination described herein. Thus, the scope of the claims is not to be limited by the illustrated embodiments.

Claims (6)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for preventing intrusion of toxic contaminants into the interior air space of a building built upon a concrete foundation through which said contaminants permeate and contaminate the interior air space, the method comprising the steps:
a. detecting the presence of contaminants within the building's interior air space or in nearby soil or groundwater;
b. preparing the top surface of the building's concrete foundation for receiving a topical application of a material;
c. applying a first layer of material upon said top surface of said concrete foundation and allowing said first layer to dry;
d. applying a second layer topcoat upon said layer formed in step c), said first and second layers reacting with one another to define a material operative to form a barrier preventing said contaminants from permeating through said foundation and into said interior air space of said building.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein in step a) and d), said materials applied to said concrete foundation chemically resistant two-part epoxy coatings.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein said chemically resistant two-part epoxy coatings are selected from the group consisting of novolac and vinyl novolac.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said first layer is applied to have a thickness from between 5-20 mil and said second layer is applied to have a thickness from between 10-40 mil.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein said material applied for said first and second layers is selected from the group consisting of novolac, vinyl novolac, Bisphenol A resin-based epoxy coatings, and Bisphenol F resin-based epoxy coatings.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein in step a, said contaminant is identified as being a contaminant selected from the group consisting of tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene isomers, vinyl chloride, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene isomers, and other chlorinated and petroleum VOCs (volatile organic compounds).
US13/714,251 2011-12-16 2012-12-13 Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air Abandoned US20130152503A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/714,251 US20130152503A1 (en) 2011-12-16 2012-12-13 Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161576546P 2011-12-16 2011-12-16
US13/714,251 US20130152503A1 (en) 2011-12-16 2012-12-13 Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130152503A1 true US20130152503A1 (en) 2013-06-20

Family

ID=48608709

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/714,251 Abandoned US20130152503A1 (en) 2011-12-16 2012-12-13 Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20130152503A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112462003A (en) * 2020-11-25 2021-03-09 中国石油大学(北京) Volatile substance detection device and method
CN113882624A (en) * 2020-07-03 2022-01-04 江西多冠建筑装饰工程有限公司 Environment-friendly decoration material integration method
CN120338486A (en) * 2025-04-03 2025-07-18 北京市生态环境保护科学研究院 A rapid assessment method for vapor intrusion risk based on interface processes

Citations (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU539045A1 (en) * 1975-10-14 1976-12-15 Белорусский Политехнический Институт The method of obtaining epoxy foam
US4148950A (en) * 1978-04-07 1979-04-10 Ameron, Inc. Epoxy surfacer cements containing polyamine-ketimine mixtures
US4460625A (en) * 1981-07-16 1984-07-17 Rohm And Haas Company Method of coating and impregnating concrete substrates, and products obtained thereby
US4684259A (en) * 1985-08-05 1987-08-04 Adolph Coors Company Epoxy mixing and dispensing apparatus
US4725097A (en) * 1985-03-06 1988-02-16 Bartell Industries Limited Inclined cutter for surface cleaning head
US4800128A (en) * 1986-06-23 1989-01-24 Keramchemie Gmbh Chemical attack-resistant, liquid-tight lining
JPH028456A (en) * 1988-06-28 1990-01-11 Masaharu Tomae Method for finishing floor surface
US4907386A (en) * 1988-07-08 1990-03-13 Paul Ekroth Shield for building foundation
JPH02225385A (en) * 1989-02-28 1990-09-07 Cemedine Co Ltd Method for forming protection film of concrete material
US5024342A (en) * 1988-11-07 1991-06-18 Dallum Barry J Corrosion resistant containers
US5107642A (en) * 1989-06-12 1992-04-28 Isola A/S Arrangement in screening of objects, especially residential houses
US5137764A (en) * 1990-12-06 1992-08-11 Doyle Dennis J Floor structure incorporating a vapor and gas barrier
EP0420924B1 (en) * 1988-06-20 1996-05-15 Rexam Graphics Limited Barrier membranes e.g. for use in building
DE19601956A1 (en) * 1995-01-09 1996-07-11 Horn Wolfgang Sealing method for prevention of dangerous gas entry into buildings
DE19620151A1 (en) * 1995-05-09 1996-11-14 Horn Wolfgang Polymer seal for preventing passage of dangerous gases and moisture into building from surrounding ground
US5618860A (en) * 1993-05-19 1997-04-08 Ameron International Corporation Epoxy polysiloxane coating and flooring compositions
US5672384A (en) * 1994-02-10 1997-09-30 Kanngard; Bengt Method of eliminating moisture problems in housing
US5711834A (en) * 1994-10-28 1998-01-27 Tonen Corporation Method of reinforcing concrete slab
US6066695A (en) * 1997-02-27 2000-05-23 Roth Werke Gmbh Method of producing thermoplastic synthetic resin compositions with reduced diffusion coefficients
US6543189B1 (en) * 2000-01-10 2003-04-08 Argent Industrial L.P. Environmental protection and detection system
US6575666B1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2003-06-10 Lawrence M. Janesky Crawlspace encapsulation system
US6706096B2 (en) * 2002-01-11 2004-03-16 Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. Method and system for protecting buildings from subsurface gases
US20060074141A1 (en) * 2004-10-06 2006-04-06 Tri-E Shielding Technologies, Llc Techniques and compositions for shielding radioactive energy
US20060150555A1 (en) * 2003-11-19 2006-07-13 Mcinerney Michael K Embedded barrier to fluid flow
US20070077370A1 (en) * 2005-10-04 2007-04-05 Crosslink Technology Inc. Gasoline-impermeable coatings
US7210992B1 (en) * 2006-08-16 2007-05-01 Fred Wade Machine for preparing floors for refinishing
US20070095681A1 (en) * 2005-10-28 2007-05-03 Craig Jones Epoxy coat kit
US20070157533A1 (en) * 2006-01-11 2007-07-12 Janesky Lawrence M Capped foundation wall encapsulation system
US20090068473A1 (en) * 2005-11-10 2009-03-12 Rudolf Wilhelmus Bernardus Van Wessel Epoxy Based Coatings
US7707961B2 (en) * 2005-08-12 2010-05-04 Tmc-Ip, Llc Apparatus for applying chemical coatings
US20110061334A1 (en) * 2009-09-14 2011-03-17 Robert Walter Smith Method and System for Remediating and Covering Wood Floors
US20130122208A1 (en) * 2011-02-14 2013-05-16 Blue Angel Paint and Coatings, Ltd. Coating Material and Method for Waterproofing a Surface
US8898994B1 (en) * 2011-04-20 2014-12-02 United States Gypsum Company Method for sealing wood subfloors

Patent Citations (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU539045A1 (en) * 1975-10-14 1976-12-15 Белорусский Политехнический Институт The method of obtaining epoxy foam
US4148950A (en) * 1978-04-07 1979-04-10 Ameron, Inc. Epoxy surfacer cements containing polyamine-ketimine mixtures
US4460625A (en) * 1981-07-16 1984-07-17 Rohm And Haas Company Method of coating and impregnating concrete substrates, and products obtained thereby
US4725097A (en) * 1985-03-06 1988-02-16 Bartell Industries Limited Inclined cutter for surface cleaning head
US4684259A (en) * 1985-08-05 1987-08-04 Adolph Coors Company Epoxy mixing and dispensing apparatus
US4800128A (en) * 1986-06-23 1989-01-24 Keramchemie Gmbh Chemical attack-resistant, liquid-tight lining
EP0420924B1 (en) * 1988-06-20 1996-05-15 Rexam Graphics Limited Barrier membranes e.g. for use in building
JPH028456A (en) * 1988-06-28 1990-01-11 Masaharu Tomae Method for finishing floor surface
US4907386A (en) * 1988-07-08 1990-03-13 Paul Ekroth Shield for building foundation
US5024342A (en) * 1988-11-07 1991-06-18 Dallum Barry J Corrosion resistant containers
JPH02225385A (en) * 1989-02-28 1990-09-07 Cemedine Co Ltd Method for forming protection film of concrete material
US5107642A (en) * 1989-06-12 1992-04-28 Isola A/S Arrangement in screening of objects, especially residential houses
US5137764A (en) * 1990-12-06 1992-08-11 Doyle Dennis J Floor structure incorporating a vapor and gas barrier
US5618860A (en) * 1993-05-19 1997-04-08 Ameron International Corporation Epoxy polysiloxane coating and flooring compositions
US5672384A (en) * 1994-02-10 1997-09-30 Kanngard; Bengt Method of eliminating moisture problems in housing
US5711834A (en) * 1994-10-28 1998-01-27 Tonen Corporation Method of reinforcing concrete slab
DE19601956A1 (en) * 1995-01-09 1996-07-11 Horn Wolfgang Sealing method for prevention of dangerous gas entry into buildings
DE19620151A1 (en) * 1995-05-09 1996-11-14 Horn Wolfgang Polymer seal for preventing passage of dangerous gases and moisture into building from surrounding ground
US6066695A (en) * 1997-02-27 2000-05-23 Roth Werke Gmbh Method of producing thermoplastic synthetic resin compositions with reduced diffusion coefficients
US6543189B1 (en) * 2000-01-10 2003-04-08 Argent Industrial L.P. Environmental protection and detection system
US6629390B2 (en) * 2000-01-10 2003-10-07 Argent Industrial, L.P. Environmental protection and detection system
US6706096B2 (en) * 2002-01-11 2004-03-16 Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. Method and system for protecting buildings from subsurface gases
US6575666B1 (en) * 2002-06-07 2003-06-10 Lawrence M. Janesky Crawlspace encapsulation system
US20080168721A1 (en) * 2003-11-19 2008-07-17 Mcinerney Michael K Configuration implementing waterproofing under a concrete surface coat of a concrete floor
US20060150555A1 (en) * 2003-11-19 2006-07-13 Mcinerney Michael K Embedded barrier to fluid flow
US20060074141A1 (en) * 2004-10-06 2006-04-06 Tri-E Shielding Technologies, Llc Techniques and compositions for shielding radioactive energy
US7707961B2 (en) * 2005-08-12 2010-05-04 Tmc-Ip, Llc Apparatus for applying chemical coatings
US20070077370A1 (en) * 2005-10-04 2007-04-05 Crosslink Technology Inc. Gasoline-impermeable coatings
US20070095681A1 (en) * 2005-10-28 2007-05-03 Craig Jones Epoxy coat kit
US20090068473A1 (en) * 2005-11-10 2009-03-12 Rudolf Wilhelmus Bernardus Van Wessel Epoxy Based Coatings
US20070157533A1 (en) * 2006-01-11 2007-07-12 Janesky Lawrence M Capped foundation wall encapsulation system
US7210992B1 (en) * 2006-08-16 2007-05-01 Fred Wade Machine for preparing floors for refinishing
US20110061334A1 (en) * 2009-09-14 2011-03-17 Robert Walter Smith Method and System for Remediating and Covering Wood Floors
US20130122208A1 (en) * 2011-02-14 2013-05-16 Blue Angel Paint and Coatings, Ltd. Coating Material and Method for Waterproofing a Surface
US8898994B1 (en) * 2011-04-20 2014-12-02 United States Gypsum Company Method for sealing wood subfloors

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Abatement of Hydrocarbon Vapors: DunLap, Lloyd E. "Abatement of hydrocarbon vapors in buildings." Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water. National Water Well Association, Worthington, OH (1984): 504-518. *
Coating Guide by ChemCo Systems available at http://www.chemcosystems.com/tech_coatguide.html, with mulitple internet archives including dated 4/13/2009 as verified by the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (last accessed on 9/21/2014). *
Epoxy Coatings Guide by Sherwin Williams dated 2008, with earliest internet archive being 7/14/2010 as verified by the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://web.archive.org/web/20100714072703/http://protective.sherwin-williams.com/pdf/Epoxy%20Coatings%20Guide.pdf (last accessed on 9/21/2014). *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113882624A (en) * 2020-07-03 2022-01-04 江西多冠建筑装饰工程有限公司 Environment-friendly decoration material integration method
CN112462003A (en) * 2020-11-25 2021-03-09 中国石油大学(北京) Volatile substance detection device and method
CN120338486A (en) * 2025-04-03 2025-07-18 北京市生态环境保护科学研究院 A rapid assessment method for vapor intrusion risk based on interface processes

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Clark et al. Roofing materials’ contributions to storm-water runoff pollution
Kim et al. Hazardous materials in buildings
US20130152503A1 (en) Method of preventing intrusion of toxic vapor into indoor air
Wahlström et al. Hazardous substances in construction products and materials: PARADE. Best practices for Pre-demolition Audits ensuring high quality RAw materials
Vo et al. Evaluation of sealants to mitigate the release of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from AFFF-impacted concrete: Characterization and forecasting
CN114918241A (en) In-situ physical-chemical synergistic blocking method for composite contaminated soil
US11220614B2 (en) Metal-based membranes for vapor intrusion mitigation
US11820897B2 (en) Vapor mitigation barriers
Huang et al. Spatial distribution of organic pollutants in industrial construction and demolition waste and their mutual interaction on an abandoned pesticide manufacturing plant
Zaharieva et al. Pre-demolition audit as a tool for appropriate CDW management–a case study of a public building
Gao et al. Methamphetamine contamination in residential properties and their remediation in Queensland, Australia
Baig et al. Modelling the extraction of soil contaminants with supercritical carbon dioxide
US20170174568A1 (en) Soil Remediation by Molecular Binding for Producing Beneficial Use Determined Polymer Concrete Products
Bellagamba et al. Remediation activities in an Italian Superfund: case study of an industrial plant in Broni
Junior CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF LUBRICATING OILS ON CONCRETE FLOORS IN AN INDUSTRIAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AND SUBSEQUENT SOIL CONTAMINATION
Douglas et al. Assessment of sealants for the mitigation of PFAS leaching from contaminated concrete
Fox et al. Evaluating factors affecting the permeability of emulsions used to stabilize radioactive contamination from a radiological dispersal device
Charbonneau Evaluation of Corrective Action Alternatives and Corrective Action Plan: 36-42 Dorset Lane, Williston
Búryová et al. LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF COATED TERRACE FLOORBOARDS
Meyer Organic Corrosion Inhibitors–New Build And Existing Structures Performance
Minarovičová THE ENVIRONMETAL ASPECT OF ETICS REGULAR MAINTENANCE
MESCHEDE et al. in Alexandria, Egypt
Arif et al. Evaluation of the performance of bituminous geomembranes (BGMs) as vapour barriers
Boestam Haga Företagscenter-historical and preliminary technical investigation of a contaminated site in Anderstorp, Småland, Sweden
Garettoa et al. Passive vapour barrier feasibility study: redevelopment of an industrial site to a residential site

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: REGENESIS BIOREMEDIATION PRODUCTS, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MORK, BENJAMIN V.;GRANT, F. PETER;WILSON, SCOTT B.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20121211 TO 20121213;REEL/FRAME:029466/0966

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION