US20110120028A1 - Moisture Barrier Wall - Google Patents
Moisture Barrier Wall Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110120028A1 US20110120028A1 US12/626,144 US62614409A US2011120028A1 US 20110120028 A1 US20110120028 A1 US 20110120028A1 US 62614409 A US62614409 A US 62614409A US 2011120028 A1 US2011120028 A1 US 2011120028A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- vertical wall
- foundation
- footing
- slab
- soil
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 78
- 238000009412 basement excavation Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000002787 reinforcement Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000004078 waterproofing Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000011440 grout Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 claims 2
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000000246 remedial effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 229920001903 high density polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 239000004700 high-density polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000009429 distress Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009431 timber framing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D19/00—Keeping dry foundation sites or other areas in the ground
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D31/00—Protective arrangements for foundations or foundation structures; Ground foundation measures for protecting the soil or the subsoil water, e.g. preventing or counteracting oil pollution
- E02D31/02—Protective arrangements for foundations or foundation structures; Ground foundation measures for protecting the soil or the subsoil water, e.g. preventing or counteracting oil pollution against ground humidity or ground water
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04B—GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS
- E04B1/00—Constructions in general; Structures which are not restricted either to walls, e.g. partitions, or floors or ceilings or roofs
- E04B1/62—Insulation or other protection; Elements or use of specified material therefor
- E04B1/66—Sealings
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to structural foundations, and more particularly to a vertical wall that prevents moisture from migrating into the zone of influence of the soil under a foundation of a residential or commercial building built in expansive soil areas.
- remedial approaches to repair damages to structures caused by expansive soils is more costly and time consuming than installing a vertical wall to prevent moisture seepage at the time of initial construction.
- remedial procedures landscaping is destroyed, mechanical units are relocated, patios and driveways are torn up, and owners and occupants of the property are displaced for weeks at a time to allow time for the repairs.
- post-tensioned concrete slabs have been used to deal with expansive soils.
- This type of construction is expensive and requires extensive engineering and specialized construction techniques.
- the floor plan designs are limited due to the constraints inherent in post-tensioned slabs.
- the current invention eliminates these constraints, is simple to install and will prevent the distress in buildings caused by foundation movement associated with both expansive and collapsible soils. Therefore, it is desirable to have a vertical wall that extends into the soil and is integral with the building foundation in order to prevent moisture from migrating into the zone of influence under the building foundation.
- a structural foundation for use in expansive or other soil comprises a foundational element.
- the foundational element is made of a vertical wall and a slab on a soil surface.
- the vertical wall is poured integral to the slab and the top of the vertical wall contacts the foundation.
- the bottom of the vertical wall extends a distance below the soil surface and prevents moisture from migrating beyond the vertical wall under the foundational element.
- a foundation appurtenance for use in expansive soils comprises a vertical wall and a foundation.
- the foundation further comprises a slab on a soil surface and a footing below the soil surface.
- the vertical wall is poured integral to the footing and the top of the vertical wall contacts the footing.
- the bottom of the vertical wall extends a distance below the soil surface and prevents moisture from migrating beyond the vertical wall under the foundation.
- the present invention is directed to a foundation used in expansive soils to prevent water migration beyond a vertical wall into a zone of influence under a building foundation.
- FIG. 1A shows a preferred embodiment of the invention where the vertical wall is an appurtenance to the foundation and is located below a footing and a slab.
- FIG. 1B shows a preferred embodiment of the invention where the vertical wall is an appurtenance to the foundation and is located below the footing and slab wherein the footing and slab are poured as a monolithic piece.
- FIG. 2 shows a preferred embodiment of the invention where the vertical wall is part of the structural foundation and is located against and flush with the top of the slab.
- FIG. 3 shows a preferred embodiment of the invention where the vertical wall is an appurtenance to the foundation and is located below the slab, stem, and footing.
- FIG. 4 shows a preferred embodiment of the invention where the vertical wall is part of the structural foundation and is located below the slab.
- FIG. 5 shows a prior art design of a remedial apparatus to repair foundation damage due to migration of water into an expansive soil under the foundation.
- FIG. 5 shows one of the prior art methods. Specifically, FIG. 5 shows a foundation 300 that includes a slab 320 , a stem 330 , and a footing 340 . Shown under the footing 340 is the zone of influence 350 which is the area of soil where with the introduction of moisture the soil could expand and cause the foundation 300 of a structure 400 built on the foundation 300 to move.
- the zone of influence 350 is defined based on the angle of repose. More specifically, the zone of influence is the area of soil that is located below the footing of the foundation and extends 45° on either side of the footing.
- the prior art shows at least one cut off wall 600 that is placed a distance away from the foundation 300 .
- These remedial cut off walls 600 are intended to prevent further moisture from entering into the zone of influence 350 and causing more damage to the foundation 300 and structure 400 .
- the remedial cut off walls 600 are placed away from the foundation 300 allowing moisture to continue entering the zone of influence 350 .
- the cut off walls 600 are installed after the structure has been built and the landscaping installed, plants and mechanical equipment 100 must be moved causing more expense and time.
- FIGS. 1A , 1 B, 2 , 3 , and 4 show how a vertical wall 200 is poured integrally with the foundation 300 at the time of initial construction so that moisture is prevented from entering the zone of influence 350 and causing damage.
- FIGS. 1A , 1 B, 2 , 3 , and 4 show how a vertical wall 200 is poured integrally with the foundation 300 at the time of initial construction so that moisture is prevented from entering the zone of influence 350 and causing damage.
- FIGS. 1A , 1 B, and 3 show an embodiment of the current invention where the vertical wall 200 is an appurtenance to the foundation 300 rather than a structural element of the foundation 300 .
- This embodiment is preferred at elevations of 0-8,000 feet above sea level. More specifically, FIGS. 1A and 1B show the preferred embodiment for elevations 0-3,000 feet above sea level and FIG. 3 shows the preferred embodiment for elevations 3,000-8,000 feet above sea level.
- a foundation system 300 that includes a slab 320 and a footing 340 .
- the slab 320 and footing 340 are poured as two separate pieces where the slab 320 has a turndown edge 345 that contacts the footing 340 .
- the topside 341 of the footing 340 contacts the underside 310 of the slab 320
- the footing 340 and slab 320 work together as the structural foundational support for a structure 400 built on the foundation 300 .
- the structure 400 may be conventional wood framing, masonry, and steel studs.
- Underneath the footing 340 is the vertical wall 200 where the top 210 of the vertical wall 200 contacts the underside 342 of the footing 340 .
- the vertical wall 200 acts to prevent moisture from migrating through the expansive soil 455 into the zone of influence 350 .
- the zone of influence 350 is the area of soil that when introduced with moisture could cause the foundation 300 to move and damage the structure 400 .
- the vertical wall 200 extends a distance below the footing 340 such that moisture is prevented from migrating beyond the vertical wall 200 into the zone of influence 350 under the foundation 300 .
- the vertical wall 200 extends a minimum of 3 feet 6 inches from the top 210 of the vertical wall 200 that contacts the underside 342 of the footing 340 to the bottom 220 of the vertical wall 200 .
- the bottom 220 of the vertical wall 200 is a minimum depth of 4 feet 6 inches below the soil surface 450 . It is preferred that the vertical wall 200 is 4 inches wide.
- the area where the footing 340 will be poured is first excavated.
- a trencher is then used to dig a 4 inch wide excavation in line with the outer edge 343 of the footing 340 a minimum of 3 feet 6 inches below the excavation of the footing 340 as described above. This 3 foot 6 inch depth can vary, however, depending on the exact make up of the soil.
- the trenched area is then cleaned and the 4 inch wide excavation is filled with concrete to create the vertical wall 200 .
- the excavation is filled with a 1 ⁇ 2 sack mix of concrete.
- the excavation could be filled with a grout mix, or any other material with similar properties.
- the vertical wall 200 is not part of the structural foundation but rather an appurtenance to the foundation 300 . As such, the vertical wall 200 does not support the structure 400 so no reinforcement is needed.
- the footing 340 is then poured with the proper concrete and steel reinforcements.
- the vertical wall 200 can be poured monolithically with the footing 340 such that the vertical wall 200 and footing 340 are one piece. Pouring the two pieces together saves time in construction.
- a waterproofing additive may be added to the vertical wall 200 such that it is impervious to water.
- a liner 500 is placed on the outside 230 of the vertical wall 200 .
- the liner 500 provides slippage of the vertical wall 200 in the soil 455 thereby eliminating friction that could cause the entire foundation 300 to move, thus causing damage to the structure 400 .
- the liner 500 is made of high density polyethylene with a thickness of 15-40 millimeters, but any material with similar properties can be used.
- the slab 320 and footing 340 are poured as one monolithic piece.
- the footing 340 and slab 320 work together as the structural foundational support for a structure 400 built on the foundation 300 .
- the structure 400 may be conventional wood framing, masonry, and steel studs.
- Underneath the footing 340 is the vertical wall 200 where the top 210 of the vertical wall 200 contacts the underside 342 of the footing 340 piece.
- the vertical wall 200 acts to prevent moisture from migrating through the expansive soil 455 into the zone of influence 350 .
- the zone of influence 350 is the area of soil that when introduced with moisture could cause the foundation 300 to move and damage the structure 400 .
- the depth of the slab 320 and footing 340 below the soil surface 450 depends on the elevation above sea level of the area where the structure 400 is being built.
- the elevation of the area is 0-3,000 feet above sea level, and the depth of the footing 340 is 12 inches below finished grade or the soil surface 450 . Because the vertical wall 200 contacts the underside 342 of the footing 340 , this 12 inch depth is also the depth at which the top 210 of the vertical wall 200 is below the soil surface 450 .
- the vertical wall 200 extends a distance below the footing 340 such that moisture is prevented from migrating beyond the vertical wall 200 into the zone of influence 350 under the foundation 300 .
- the vertical wall 200 extends 3 feet 6 inches from the top 210 of the vertical wall 200 that contacts the underside 342 of the footing 340 to the bottom 220 of the vertical wall 200 .
- This means that the bottom 220 of the vertical wall 200 is a depth of 4 feet 6 inches below the soil surface 450 . It is preferred that the vertical wall 200 is 4 inches wide.
- the area where the footing 340 will be poured is first excavated.
- a trencher is then used to dig a 4 inch wide excavation in line with the outer edge 343 of the footing 340 a minimum of 3 feet 6 inches below the footing 340 as described above. This 3 foot 6 inch depth can vary, however, depending on the exact make up of the soil 455 .
- the trenched area is then cleaned and the 4 inch wide excavation is filled with concrete to create the vertical wall 200 .
- the excavation is filled with a 1 ⁇ 2 sack mix of concrete.
- the excavation could be filled with a grout mix.
- the vertical wall 200 is not part of the structural foundation but rather an appurtenance to the foundation 300 . As such, the vertical wall 200 does not support the structure 400 so no reinforcement is needed.
- the footing 340 and slab 320 are then poured with the proper concrete and steel reinforcements.
- the vertical wall 200 can be poured monolithically with the footing 340 and slab 320 such that the vertical wall 200 and footing 340 are one piece. Pouring the pieces together saves time in construction.
- a waterproofing additive may be added to the vertical wall 200 such that it is impervious to water.
- a liner 500 is placed on the outside 230 of the vertical wall 200 .
- the liner 500 provides slippage of the vertical wall 200 in the soil 455 thereby eliminating friction that could cause the entire foundation 300 to move, thus causing damage to the structure 400 .
- the liner 500 is made of high density polyethylene with a thickness of 15-40 millimeters, but any material with similar properties can be used.
- the area where the footing 340 will be poured is first excavated.
- a trencher is then used to dig a 4 inch wide excavation in line with the outer edge 343 of the footing 340 a minimum of 3 feet 6 inches below the footing 340 as described above. This 3 foot 6 inch depth can vary, however, depending on the exact make up of the soil 455 .
- the trenched area is then cleaned and the 4 inch wide excavation is filled with concrete to create the vertical wall 200 .
- the excavation is filled with a 1 ⁇ 2 sack mix of concrete.
- the excavation could be filled with a grout mix.
- a liner 500 is placed on the outside 230 of the vertical wall 200 .
- the liner 500 provides slippage of the vertical wall 200 in the soil 455 thereby eliminating friction that could cause the entire foundation 300 to move, thus causing damage to the structure 400 .
- the liner 500 is made of high density polyethylene with a thickness of 15-40 millimeters, but any material with similar properties can be used.
- FIGS. 2 and 4 show an embodiment of the current invention where the vertical wall 200 is a structural element of the foundation 300 . More specifically, FIG. 2 shows a preferred embodiment where the vertical wall 200 comes out of the soil surface 450 and is poured up against and flush with the top of the slab 320 . The preferred embodiment shown in FIG. 4 depicts the vertical wall 200 on the underside 325 of the slab 320 .
- the embodiment in FIG. 2 shows a foundation 300 that includes a slab 320 and a vertical wall 200 .
- the vertical wall 200 acts as the footing 340 while at the same time preventing moisture from migrating beyond the vertical wall 200 into the zone of influence 350 .
- the vertical wall 200 includes a top portion 240 and a bottom portion 260 .
- the top portion 240 of the vertical wall 200 extends 12 inches in height and is formed to accommodate the final vertical wall 200 thickness. This thickness of the vertical wall 200 is preferably 8 inches, but can be thicker by widening the vertical wall 200 depending on the conditions.
- the bottom portion 260 of the vertical wall 200 starts 12 inches below the top 210 of the vertical wall 200 and extends a minimum depth of 4 feet 6 inches to the bottom 220 of the vertical wall 200 in order to prevent moisture from migrating beyond the vertical wall 200 into the zone of influence 350 .
- a trencher is used to dig an 8 inch wide excavation 4 feet 6 inches below the soil surface 450 or as desirable or required by code.
- the trenched area is cleaned and the excavation is filled with concrete to create the vertical wall 200 .
- the concrete is normal 2500 psi concrete.
- Steel reinforcements are included in the vertical wall 200 along with vertical bars. The reinforcements are required because the vertical wall 200 is part of the structural foundation of the structure 400 .
- the slab 320 is then poured up against and flush with the top 210 of the vertical wall 200 as shown in FIG. 2 .
- the vertical wall 200 can be poured monolithically with the slab 320 such that the vertical wall 200 and slab 320 are one piece.
- a waterproofing additive may be added to the vertical wall 200 such that it is impervious to water.
- a liner 500 is placed on the outside 230 of the vertical wall 200 .
- the liner 500 provides slippage of the vertical wall 200 in the soil 455 thereby eliminating friction that could cause the entire foundation 300 to move, thus causing damage to the structure 400 .
- the liner 500 is made of high density polyethylene with a thickness of 15-40 millimeters, but any material with similar properties can be used.
- FIG. 4 shows a foundation 300 that includes a turndown slab 320 and a vertical wall 200 .
- the vertical wall 200 acts as the footing 340 while at the same time preventing moisture from migrating beyond the vertical wall 200 into the zone of influence 350 under the foundation 300 .
- the vertical wall 200 includes a top 210 and a bottom 220 .
- the top 210 of the vertical wall 200 contacts the underside 325 of the turn down slab 320 10 inches below the topside 321 of the slab 320 .
- the top 210 of the vertical wall 200 starts 10 inches below the topside 321 of the slab 320 and extends a depth of 4 feet 6 inches to the bottom 220 of the vertical wall 200 in order to prevent moisture from migrating beyond the vertical wall 200 through the soil 455 into the zone of influence 350 under the foundation 300 .
- the vertical wall is 8 inches wide.
- a trencher is used to dig an 8 inch wide excavation 4 feet 6 inches below the soil surface 450 or as desirable or required by code.
- the trenched area is cleaned and the excavation is filled with concrete to create the vertical wall 200 .
- the concrete is normal 2500 psi concrete.
- Steel reinforcements are included in the vertical wall 200 along with vertical bars. The reinforcements are required because the vertical wall 200 is part of the structural foundation of the structure 400 .
- the outer edge 323 of the slab 320 is formed to accommodate the slab 320 thickness and the small portion of the stem wall 331 required to bring the slab 320 to finished floor elevation.
- a waterproofing additive may be added to the vertical wall 200 such that it is impervious to water.
- a liner 500 is placed on the outside 230 of the vertical wall 200 .
- the liner 500 provides slippage of the vertical wall 200 in the soil 455 thereby eliminating friction that could cause the entire foundation 300 to move, thus causing damage to the structure 400 .
- the liner 500 is made of high density polyethylene with a thickness of 15-40 millimeters, but any material with similar properties can be used.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Paleontology (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Building Environments (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates generally to structural foundations, and more particularly to a vertical wall that prevents moisture from migrating into the zone of influence of the soil under a foundation of a residential or commercial building built in expansive soil areas.
- Several techniques have been used in the past to solve structural problems caused when buildings are built on expansive soils which shrink and swell with moisture. Specifically, below-grade barriers can be installed after construction and after distress manifests itself in a building. These after the fact barriers are very expensive and intrusive. Moreover, these barriers are placed several feet beyond the existing building slab or footing thereby necessitating an additional barrier to prevent moisture from migrating between the below-grade barrier and the existing building slab or footing. Repairs after the fact are extremely costly depending on the amount of damage associated with the foundation movement due to the expansive soil below. Other similar barriers used to repair damage after the fact include cutoff walls of concrete or synthetic membranes.
- The use of after the fact remedial approaches to repair damages to structures caused by expansive soils is more costly and time consuming than installing a vertical wall to prevent moisture seepage at the time of initial construction. With after the fact remedial procedures, landscaping is destroyed, mechanical units are relocated, patios and driveways are torn up, and owners and occupants of the property are displaced for weeks at a time to allow time for the repairs.
- In the prior art methods, post-tensioned concrete slabs have been used to deal with expansive soils. This type of construction, however, is expensive and requires extensive engineering and specialized construction techniques. Additionally, the floor plan designs are limited due to the constraints inherent in post-tensioned slabs. The current invention eliminates these constraints, is simple to install and will prevent the distress in buildings caused by foundation movement associated with both expansive and collapsible soils. Therefore, it is desirable to have a vertical wall that extends into the soil and is integral with the building foundation in order to prevent moisture from migrating into the zone of influence under the building foundation.
- Various techniques have been disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,015,432 (H F Ball), 4,534,143 (Goines et al.), 5,924,251 (Jalla), 4,508,472 (Handy), 3,269,126 (Freeman), 1,746,918 (Webster), 7,131,239 (Williams), 7,003,918 (Williams), U.S. Patent Application Nos. 20080304919 (Coyle), 20030233798 (Berkey et al.), 20030188496 (Williams), and International Publication No. WO 2005021874 (Bashford) to overcome the problems with building on expansive soils. However, these disclosures suffer from one or more of the following disadvantages. First, none of these inventions include a vertical wall that extends deep below the surface of the soil and is integral with the building foundation. Second, none of these inventions are simple and inexpensive designs. Third, most of the inventions above are remedial in nature rather than including a design that prevents foundation problems at the time of initial construction.
- A structural foundation for use in expansive or other soil comprises a foundational element. The foundational element is made of a vertical wall and a slab on a soil surface. The vertical wall is poured integral to the slab and the top of the vertical wall contacts the foundation. The bottom of the vertical wall extends a distance below the soil surface and prevents moisture from migrating beyond the vertical wall under the foundational element.
- In an alternate embodiment, a foundation appurtenance for use in expansive soils comprises a vertical wall and a foundation. The foundation further comprises a slab on a soil surface and a footing below the soil surface. The vertical wall is poured integral to the footing and the top of the vertical wall contacts the footing. The bottom of the vertical wall extends a distance below the soil surface and prevents moisture from migrating beyond the vertical wall under the foundation.
- The present invention is directed to a foundation used in expansive soils to prevent water migration beyond a vertical wall into a zone of influence under a building foundation.
- It is a further object of the present invention to provide a foundation with a vertical wall that is poured integral with the foundation.
- It is a further object of the present invention to provide a foundation with a vertical wall that is installed at the time of initial construction.
- The novel features that are considered characteristic of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, both as to its structure and its operation together with the additional object and advantages thereof will best be understood from the following description of the preferred embodiment of the invention when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Unless specifically noted, it is intended that the words and phrases in the specification and claims be given the ordinary and accustomed meaning to those of ordinary skill in the applicable art or arts. If any other meaning is intended, the specification will specifically state that a special meaning is being applied to a word or phrase Likewise, the use of the words “function” or “means” in the Description of Preferred Embodiments is not intended to indicate a desire to invoke the special provision of 35 U.S.C. §112, paragraph 6 to define the invention. To the contrary, if the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, paragraph 6 are sought to be invoked to define the invention(s), the claims will specifically state the phrases “means for” or “step for” and a function, without also reciting in such phrases any structure, material, or act in support of the function.
- Moreover, even if the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, paragraph 6 are invoked to define the inventions, it is intended that the inventions not be limited only to the specific structure, material or acts that are described in the preferred embodiments, but in addition, include any and all structures, materials or acts that perform the claimed function, along with any and all known or later developed equivalent structures, materials, or acts for performing the claimed function.
-
FIG. 1A shows a preferred embodiment of the invention where the vertical wall is an appurtenance to the foundation and is located below a footing and a slab. -
FIG. 1B shows a preferred embodiment of the invention where the vertical wall is an appurtenance to the foundation and is located below the footing and slab wherein the footing and slab are poured as a monolithic piece. -
FIG. 2 shows a preferred embodiment of the invention where the vertical wall is part of the structural foundation and is located against and flush with the top of the slab. -
FIG. 3 shows a preferred embodiment of the invention where the vertical wall is an appurtenance to the foundation and is located below the slab, stem, and footing. -
FIG. 4 shows a preferred embodiment of the invention where the vertical wall is part of the structural foundation and is located below the slab. -
FIG. 5 shows a prior art design of a remedial apparatus to repair foundation damage due to migration of water into an expansive soil under the foundation. - As described above, several techniques have been used in the past to solve structural problems caused when buildings are built on
expansive soils 455 which shrink and swell with moisture.FIG. 5 shows one of the prior art methods. Specifically,FIG. 5 shows afoundation 300 that includes a slab 320, astem 330, and afooting 340. Shown under thefooting 340 is the zone ofinfluence 350 which is the area of soil where with the introduction of moisture the soil could expand and cause thefoundation 300 of astructure 400 built on thefoundation 300 to move. The zone ofinfluence 350 is defined based on the angle of repose. More specifically, the zone of influence is the area of soil that is located below the footing of the foundation and extends 45° on either side of the footing. When moisture enters the zone ofinfluence 350, the moisture can cause the soil to move and in turn can cause thefoundation 300 to shift damaging thestructure 400 built on thefoundation 300. To remedy the damage that has already occurred because of the migration of moisture into the zone ofinfluence 350, the prior art shows at least one cut offwall 600 that is placed a distance away from thefoundation 300. These remedial cut offwalls 600 are intended to prevent further moisture from entering into the zone ofinfluence 350 and causing more damage to thefoundation 300 andstructure 400. As seen inFIG. 5 , however, the remedial cut offwalls 600 are placed away from thefoundation 300 allowing moisture to continue entering the zone ofinfluence 350. Moreover, because the cut offwalls 600 are installed after the structure has been built and the landscaping installed, plants andmechanical equipment 100 must be moved causing more expense and time. - In contrast, the preferred embodiments of the present invention shown in
FIGS. 1A , 1B, 2, 3, and 4 show how avertical wall 200 is poured integrally with thefoundation 300 at the time of initial construction so that moisture is prevented from entering the zone ofinfluence 350 and causing damage. There are several embodiments of the invention depending on the type of soil and the elevation at which thefoundation 300 andstructure 400 will be constructed. -
FIGS. 1A , 1B, and 3 show an embodiment of the current invention where thevertical wall 200 is an appurtenance to thefoundation 300 rather than a structural element of thefoundation 300. This embodiment is preferred at elevations of 0-8,000 feet above sea level. More specifically,FIGS. 1A and 1B show the preferred embodiment for elevations 0-3,000 feet above sea level andFIG. 3 shows the preferred embodiment for elevations 3,000-8,000 feet above sea level. - In
FIGS. 1A and 1B , afoundation system 300 is shown that includes aslab 320 and afooting 340. InFIG. 1A theslab 320 andfooting 340 are poured as two separate pieces where theslab 320 has aturndown edge 345 that contacts thefooting 340. In this embodiment, thetopside 341 of the footing 340 contacts theunderside 310 of theslab 320, and thefooting 340 andslab 320 work together as the structural foundational support for astructure 400 built on thefoundation 300. Thestructure 400 may be conventional wood framing, masonry, and steel studs. Underneath thefooting 340 is thevertical wall 200 where the top 210 of thevertical wall 200 contacts theunderside 342 of thefooting 340. - In the current invention, the
vertical wall 200 acts to prevent moisture from migrating through theexpansive soil 455 into the zone ofinfluence 350. As explained above, the zone ofinfluence 350 is the area of soil that when introduced with moisture could cause thefoundation 300 to move and damage thestructure 400. - The depth of the
slab 320 andfooting 340 below thesoil surface 450 depends on the elevation above sea level of the area where thestructure 400 is being built. In the embodiment shown inFIG. 1A , the elevation of the area is 0-3,000 feet above sea level, and the depth of theslab 320 and thefooting 340 is preferably 12 inches below finished grade or thesoil surface 450. Because thevertical wall 200 contacts theunderside 342 of thefooting 340 this 12 inch depth is also the depth at which the top 210 of thevertical wall 200 is below thesoil surface 450. - The
vertical wall 200 extends a distance below thefooting 340 such that moisture is prevented from migrating beyond thevertical wall 200 into the zone ofinfluence 350 under thefoundation 300. In the preferred embodiment shown inFIG. 1A , thevertical wall 200 extends a minimum of 3 feet 6 inches from the top 210 of thevertical wall 200 that contacts theunderside 342 of thefooting 340 to thebottom 220 of thevertical wall 200. In other words, thebottom 220 of thevertical wall 200 is a minimum depth of 4 feet 6 inches below thesoil surface 450. It is preferred that thevertical wall 200 is 4 inches wide. - To create the
foundation 300 shown in the preferred embodiment ofFIG. 1A , the area where thefooting 340 will be poured is first excavated. A trencher is then used to dig a 4 inch wide excavation in line with theouter edge 343 of the footing 340 a minimum of 3 feet 6 inches below the excavation of thefooting 340 as described above. This 3 foot 6 inch depth can vary, however, depending on the exact make up of the soil. The trenched area is then cleaned and the 4 inch wide excavation is filled with concrete to create thevertical wall 200. Preferably, the excavation is filled with a ½ sack mix of concrete. Alternatively, however, the excavation could be filled with a grout mix, or any other material with similar properties. In this embodiment, no additional steel reinforcement is needed because, as stated above, thevertical wall 200 is not part of the structural foundation but rather an appurtenance to thefoundation 300. As such, thevertical wall 200 does not support thestructure 400 so no reinforcement is needed. Once thevertical wall 200 is poured, thefooting 340 is then poured with the proper concrete and steel reinforcements. In an alternate embodiment, thevertical wall 200 can be poured monolithically with thefooting 340 such that thevertical wall 200 andfooting 340 are one piece. Pouring the two pieces together saves time in construction. Additionally, depending upon the conditions, a waterproofing additive may be added to thevertical wall 200 such that it is impervious to water. - Moreover, if it is determined that the
soil 455 where thefoundation 300 andstructure 400 are being built has a swell potential greater than 2%, aliner 500 is placed on the outside 230 of thevertical wall 200. Theliner 500 provides slippage of thevertical wall 200 in thesoil 455 thereby eliminating friction that could cause theentire foundation 300 to move, thus causing damage to thestructure 400. It is preferred that theliner 500 is made of high density polyethylene with a thickness of 15-40 millimeters, but any material with similar properties can be used. - In the embodiment shown in
FIG. 1B , theslab 320 andfooting 340 are poured as one monolithic piece. Here, thefooting 340 andslab 320 work together as the structural foundational support for astructure 400 built on thefoundation 300. Thestructure 400 may be conventional wood framing, masonry, and steel studs. Underneath thefooting 340 is thevertical wall 200 where the top 210 of thevertical wall 200 contacts theunderside 342 of thefooting 340 piece. - In this embodiment of the current invention, the
vertical wall 200 acts to prevent moisture from migrating through theexpansive soil 455 into the zone ofinfluence 350. As explained above, the zone ofinfluence 350 is the area of soil that when introduced with moisture could cause thefoundation 300 to move and damage thestructure 400. - In this embodiment, the depth of the
slab 320 andfooting 340 below thesoil surface 450 depends on the elevation above sea level of the area where thestructure 400 is being built. In the embodiment shown inFIG. 1B , the elevation of the area is 0-3,000 feet above sea level, and the depth of thefooting 340 is 12 inches below finished grade or thesoil surface 450. Because thevertical wall 200 contacts theunderside 342 of thefooting 340, this 12 inch depth is also the depth at which the top 210 of thevertical wall 200 is below thesoil surface 450. - The
vertical wall 200 extends a distance below thefooting 340 such that moisture is prevented from migrating beyond thevertical wall 200 into the zone ofinfluence 350 under thefoundation 300. In the preferred embodiment shown inFIG. 1B , thevertical wall 200 extends 3 feet 6 inches from the top 210 of thevertical wall 200 that contacts theunderside 342 of thefooting 340 to thebottom 220 of thevertical wall 200. This means that thebottom 220 of thevertical wall 200 is a depth of 4 feet 6 inches below thesoil surface 450. It is preferred that thevertical wall 200 is 4 inches wide. - To create the
foundation 300 shown In the preferred embodiment ofFIG. 1B , the area where thefooting 340 will be poured is first excavated. A trencher is then used to dig a 4 inch wide excavation in line with theouter edge 343 of the footing 340 a minimum of 3 feet 6 inches below thefooting 340 as described above. This 3 foot 6 inch depth can vary, however, depending on the exact make up of thesoil 455. The trenched area is then cleaned and the 4 inch wide excavation is filled with concrete to create thevertical wall 200. Preferably, the excavation is filled with a ½ sack mix of concrete. Alternatively, however, the excavation could be filled with a grout mix. In this embodiment, no additional steel reinforcement is needed because, as stated above, thevertical wall 200 is not part of the structural foundation but rather an appurtenance to thefoundation 300. As such, thevertical wall 200 does not support thestructure 400 so no reinforcement is needed. Once thevertical wall 200 is poured, thefooting 340 andslab 320 are then poured with the proper concrete and steel reinforcements. In an alternate embodiment, thevertical wall 200 can be poured monolithically with thefooting 340 andslab 320 such that thevertical wall 200 andfooting 340 are one piece. Pouring the pieces together saves time in construction. Additionally, depending on the conditions, a waterproofing additive may be added to thevertical wall 200 such that it is impervious to water. - If it is determined that the
soil 455 where thefoundation 300 andstructure 400 are being built has a swell potential greater than 2%, aliner 500 is placed on the outside 230 of thevertical wall 200. Theliner 500 provides slippage of thevertical wall 200 in thesoil 455 thereby eliminating friction that could cause theentire foundation 300 to move, thus causing damage to thestructure 400. It is preferred that theliner 500 is made of high density polyethylene with a thickness of 15-40 millimeters, but any material with similar properties can be used. - The embodiment in
FIG. 3 shows afoundation 300 used forstructures 400 built at elevations between 3,000 feet and 8,000 feet. In this embodiment, thefoundation 300 includes aslab 320, afooting 340, and astem 330. Thestem 330 is the structural piece between theslab 320 and thefooting 340. In this embodiment, the depth of theslab 320,stem 330, and thefooting 340 below finished grade, orsoil level 450, is dependent on the elevation at which thestructure 400 is being constructed. Specifically, at elevations of 3,000 to 5,000 feet, the depth belowsoil level 450 is 18 inches; at elevations of 5,000 to 7,000 feet, the depth belowsoil level 450 is 24 inches; and for elevations of 7,000 to 8,000 feet, the depth belowsoil level 450 is 36 inches. Because thevertical wall 200 contacts theunderside 342 of thefooting 340, these depths are also the depths at which the top 210 of thevertical wall 200 is below thesoil surface 450. - The
vertical wall 200 extends a distance below thefooting 340 such that moisture is prevented from migrating beyond thevertical wall 200 into the zone ofinfluence 350 under thefoundation 300. In the preferred embodiment shown inFIG. 3 , thevertical wall 200 extends a minimum of 3 feet 6 inches from the top 210 of thevertical wall 200 that contacts theunderside 342 of thefooting 340 to thebottom 220 of thevertical wall 200. This means that thebottom 220 of thevertical wall 200 is a depth of 4 feet 6 inches below thesoil surface 450. This total depth depends, however, on the depth of theslab 320,stem 330, andfooting 340 below thesoil surface 450 as explained above. Depending on the elevation at which thestructure 400 is being built, the total depth of thevertical wall 200 will vary. It is preferred that thevertical wall 200 is 4 inches wide. - To create the
foundation 300 shown inFIG. 3 , the area where thefooting 340 will be poured is first excavated. A trencher is then used to dig a 4 inch wide excavation in line with theouter edge 343 of the footing 340 a minimum of 3 feet 6 inches below thefooting 340 as described above. This 3 foot 6 inch depth can vary, however, depending on the exact make up of thesoil 455. The trenched area is then cleaned and the 4 inch wide excavation is filled with concrete to create thevertical wall 200. Preferably, the excavation is filled with a ½ sack mix of concrete. Alternatively, however, the excavation could be filled with a grout mix. In this embodiment, no additional steel reinforcement is needed because, as stated above, thevertical wall 200 is not part of thestructural foundation 300, but rather an appurtenance to thefoundation 300. As such, thevertical wall 200 does not support thestructure 400 so no reinforcement is needed. Once thevertical wall 200 is poured, thefooting 340,stem 330, andslab 320 are then poured with the proper steel reinforcements and concrete. In an alternate embodiment, thevertical wall 200 can be poured monolithically with thefooting 340 such that thefooting 340 andvertical wall 200 are one piece. Pouring the pieces together saves time in contruction. Additionally, depending on the conditions, a waterproofing additive may be added to thevertical wall 200 making it impervious to water. - If it is determined that the
soil 455 where thefoundation 300 andstructure 400 are being built has a swell potential greater than 2%, aliner 500 is placed on the outside 230 of thevertical wall 200. Theliner 500 provides slippage of thevertical wall 200 in thesoil 455 thereby eliminating friction that could cause theentire foundation 300 to move, thus causing damage to thestructure 400. It is preferred that theliner 500 is made of high density polyethylene with a thickness of 15-40 millimeters, but any material with similar properties can be used. -
FIGS. 2 and 4 show an embodiment of the current invention where thevertical wall 200 is a structural element of thefoundation 300. More specifically,FIG. 2 shows a preferred embodiment where thevertical wall 200 comes out of thesoil surface 450 and is poured up against and flush with the top of theslab 320. The preferred embodiment shown inFIG. 4 depicts thevertical wall 200 on theunderside 325 of theslab 320. - The embodiment in
FIG. 2 shows afoundation 300 that includes aslab 320 and avertical wall 200. In this embodiment, thevertical wall 200 acts as thefooting 340 while at the same time preventing moisture from migrating beyond thevertical wall 200 into the zone ofinfluence 350. Thevertical wall 200 includes atop portion 240 and abottom portion 260. Thetop portion 240 of thevertical wall 200 extends 12 inches in height and is formed to accommodate the finalvertical wall 200 thickness. This thickness of thevertical wall 200 is preferably 8 inches, but can be thicker by widening thevertical wall 200 depending on the conditions. Thebottom portion 260 of thevertical wall 200 starts 12 inches below the top 210 of thevertical wall 200 and extends a minimum depth of 4 feet 6 inches to thebottom 220 of thevertical wall 200 in order to prevent moisture from migrating beyond thevertical wall 200 into the zone ofinfluence 350. - To create the
foundation 300 shown in the preferred embodiment ofFIG. 2 , a trencher is used to dig an 8 inch wide excavation 4 feet 6 inches below thesoil surface 450 or as desirable or required by code. The trenched area is cleaned and the excavation is filled with concrete to create thevertical wall 200. It is preferred that the concrete is normal 2500 psi concrete. Steel reinforcements are included in thevertical wall 200 along with vertical bars. The reinforcements are required because thevertical wall 200 is part of the structural foundation of thestructure 400. Theslab 320 is then poured up against and flush with the top 210 of thevertical wall 200 as shown inFIG. 2 . In an alternate embodiment, thevertical wall 200 can be poured monolithically with theslab 320 such that thevertical wall 200 andslab 320 are one piece. Additionally, depending on the conditions, a waterproofing additive may be added to thevertical wall 200 such that it is impervious to water. - If it is determined that the
soil 455 where thefoundation 300 andstructure 400 are being built has a swell potential greater than 2%, aliner 500 is placed on the outside 230 of thevertical wall 200. Theliner 500 provides slippage of thevertical wall 200 in thesoil 455 thereby eliminating friction that could cause theentire foundation 300 to move, thus causing damage to thestructure 400. It is preferred that theliner 500 is made of high density polyethylene with a thickness of 15-40 millimeters, but any material with similar properties can be used. - The embodiment in
FIG. 4 shows afoundation 300 that includes aturndown slab 320 and avertical wall 200. In this embodiment, thevertical wall 200 acts as thefooting 340 while at the same time preventing moisture from migrating beyond thevertical wall 200 into the zone ofinfluence 350 under thefoundation 300. Thevertical wall 200 includes a top 210 and a bottom 220. The top 210 of thevertical wall 200 contacts theunderside 325 of the turn downslab 320 10 inches below thetopside 321 of theslab 320. Therefore, it is preferred that the top 210 of thevertical wall 200 starts 10 inches below thetopside 321 of theslab 320 and extends a depth of 4 feet 6 inches to thebottom 220 of thevertical wall 200 in order to prevent moisture from migrating beyond thevertical wall 200 through thesoil 455 into the zone ofinfluence 350 under thefoundation 300. In this embodiment, it is preferred that the vertical wall is 8 inches wide. - To create the foundation in the preferred embodiment shown in
FIG. 4 , a trencher is used to dig an 8 inch wide excavation 4 feet 6 inches below thesoil surface 450 or as desirable or required by code. The trenched area is cleaned and the excavation is filled with concrete to create thevertical wall 200. It is preferred that the concrete is normal 2500 psi concrete. Steel reinforcements are included in thevertical wall 200 along with vertical bars. The reinforcements are required because thevertical wall 200 is part of the structural foundation of thestructure 400. The outer edge 323 of theslab 320 is formed to accommodate theslab 320 thickness and the small portion of thestem wall 331 required to bring theslab 320 to finished floor elevation. Additionally, depending on the conditions, a waterproofing additive may be added to thevertical wall 200 such that it is impervious to water. - If it is determined that the
soil 455 where thefoundation 300 andstructure 400 are being built has a swell potential greater than 2%, aliner 500 is placed on the outside 230 of thevertical wall 200. Theliner 500 provides slippage of thevertical wall 200 in thesoil 455 thereby eliminating friction that could cause theentire foundation 300 to move, thus causing damage to thestructure 400. It is preferred that theliner 500 is made of high density polyethylene with a thickness of 15-40 millimeters, but any material with similar properties can be used. - The preferred embodiment of the invention is described in the Description of Preferred Embodiments. While these descriptions directly describe the one embodiment, it is understood that those skilled in the art may conceive modifications and/or variations to the specific embodiments shown and described herein. Any such modifications or variations that fall within the purview of this description are intended to be included therein as well. Unless specifically noted, it is the intention of the inventor that the words and phrases in the specification and claims be given the ordinary and accustomed meanings to those of ordinary skill in the applicable art(s). The foregoing description of a preferred embodiment and best mode of the invention known to the applicant at the time of filing the application has been presented and is intended for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and many modifications and variations are possible in the light of the above teachings. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application and to enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Claims (27)
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/626,144 US8689506B2 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2009-11-25 | Moisture barrier wall |
| US14/243,109 US20140208668A1 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2014-04-02 | Moisture Barrier Wall |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/626,144 US8689506B2 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2009-11-25 | Moisture barrier wall |
Related Child Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US14/243,109 Continuation US20140208668A1 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2014-04-02 | Moisture Barrier Wall |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20110120028A1 true US20110120028A1 (en) | 2011-05-26 |
| US8689506B2 US8689506B2 (en) | 2014-04-08 |
Family
ID=44061033
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/626,144 Expired - Fee Related US8689506B2 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2009-11-25 | Moisture barrier wall |
| US14/243,109 Abandoned US20140208668A1 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2014-04-02 | Moisture Barrier Wall |
Family Applications After (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US14/243,109 Abandoned US20140208668A1 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2014-04-02 | Moisture Barrier Wall |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US8689506B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9493925B2 (en) * | 2014-06-11 | 2016-11-15 | Texas Pro-Chemical Soil Stabilization, Inc. | Apparatus and method for stabilizing a slab foundation |
| US9611615B2 (en) * | 2014-06-11 | 2017-04-04 | Texas Pro-Chemical Soil Stabilization, Inc. | Apparatus and method for stabilizing a slab foundation |
Citations (19)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1728736A (en) * | 1926-09-18 | 1929-09-17 | Shergold Percy Frank | Means for preventing or reducing the transmission to buildings of vibrations caused by road traffic |
| US1746918A (en) * | 1927-12-12 | 1930-02-11 | Webster Fred Elburn | Foundation |
| US3269126A (en) * | 1963-10-07 | 1966-08-30 | Jr Thomas R Freeman | Methods for stabilizing and raising foundation structures |
| US3543459A (en) * | 1968-09-05 | 1970-12-01 | George C Mills | Method and means for stabilizing concrete slab structures |
| US4015432A (en) * | 1974-12-26 | 1977-04-05 | Ball Henry F | Stabilizing subsoil moisture under light structures |
| US4508472A (en) * | 1982-11-03 | 1985-04-02 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Method for controlling moisture-expansive clay supporting building foundations |
| US4534143A (en) * | 1983-10-24 | 1985-08-13 | Midwest Irrigation And Foundation, Inc. | System for controlling the moisture in the subsurface soil surrounding a building |
| US5674929A (en) * | 1993-09-08 | 1997-10-07 | Mbt Holding Ag | Cementitious compositions for layered applications |
| US5924251A (en) * | 1995-06-15 | 1999-07-20 | Jalla; Maharaj K. | Foundation in expansive soil |
| US5934036A (en) * | 1996-11-01 | 1999-08-10 | Gallagher, Jr.; Daniel P. | Insulated concrete slab assembly |
| US5953864A (en) * | 1997-04-23 | 1999-09-21 | Rapid Wall Systems | Prefabricated modular concrete foundation wall systems and methods of constructing prefabricated modular concrete foundation wall systems |
| US6237291B1 (en) * | 1999-08-10 | 2001-05-29 | John Ernest Elwart | Floor receiving concrete block |
| US20030188496A1 (en) * | 2002-04-09 | 2003-10-09 | Williams Jonathan P. | Structural slab and wall assembly for use with expansive soils |
| US20030233798A1 (en) * | 2002-06-21 | 2003-12-25 | Berkey John William | Post-tensioned, below-grade concrete foundation system |
| US7003918B2 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2006-02-28 | Williams Jonathan P | Building foundation with unique slab and wall assembly, external sump, and void retention dam |
| US7010891B1 (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2006-03-14 | Ryan Clark | Haunch assembly for supporting a concrete slab and method of making the haunch assembly |
| US20070269273A1 (en) * | 2003-12-15 | 2007-11-22 | Henderson Allan P | Post-tension pile anchor foundation and method therefor |
| US20080292410A1 (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2008-11-27 | Brown Robert K | Methods and apparatus for foundation systems |
| US20080304919A1 (en) * | 2007-06-08 | 2008-12-11 | Coyle Michael D | Adjustable pier/footing cap for creating an adjustable building foundation |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2042779A (en) * | 1931-05-23 | 1936-06-02 | Hurxthal F Frease | Joist for joist and tile construction for floors and the like |
| US4137684A (en) * | 1977-02-04 | 1979-02-06 | Selleck Nicholls Williams (E.C.C.) Limited | Building panel |
| US6182412B1 (en) * | 1998-04-08 | 2001-02-06 | Timothy L. Traxler | Architectural waterproofing membrane and termite barrier |
| US6279275B1 (en) * | 2000-06-14 | 2001-08-28 | Robert D. Sawyer | Foundation wall construction having water impervious drain panels |
| WO2005021874A2 (en) | 2003-08-21 | 2005-03-10 | Arizona Board Of Regents | Slab off grade building foundation system |
-
2009
- 2009-11-25 US US12/626,144 patent/US8689506B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2014
- 2014-04-02 US US14/243,109 patent/US20140208668A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (20)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1728736A (en) * | 1926-09-18 | 1929-09-17 | Shergold Percy Frank | Means for preventing or reducing the transmission to buildings of vibrations caused by road traffic |
| US1746918A (en) * | 1927-12-12 | 1930-02-11 | Webster Fred Elburn | Foundation |
| US3269126A (en) * | 1963-10-07 | 1966-08-30 | Jr Thomas R Freeman | Methods for stabilizing and raising foundation structures |
| US3543459A (en) * | 1968-09-05 | 1970-12-01 | George C Mills | Method and means for stabilizing concrete slab structures |
| US4015432A (en) * | 1974-12-26 | 1977-04-05 | Ball Henry F | Stabilizing subsoil moisture under light structures |
| US4508472A (en) * | 1982-11-03 | 1985-04-02 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Method for controlling moisture-expansive clay supporting building foundations |
| US4534143A (en) * | 1983-10-24 | 1985-08-13 | Midwest Irrigation And Foundation, Inc. | System for controlling the moisture in the subsurface soil surrounding a building |
| US5674929A (en) * | 1993-09-08 | 1997-10-07 | Mbt Holding Ag | Cementitious compositions for layered applications |
| US5924251A (en) * | 1995-06-15 | 1999-07-20 | Jalla; Maharaj K. | Foundation in expansive soil |
| US5934036A (en) * | 1996-11-01 | 1999-08-10 | Gallagher, Jr.; Daniel P. | Insulated concrete slab assembly |
| US5953864A (en) * | 1997-04-23 | 1999-09-21 | Rapid Wall Systems | Prefabricated modular concrete foundation wall systems and methods of constructing prefabricated modular concrete foundation wall systems |
| US6237291B1 (en) * | 1999-08-10 | 2001-05-29 | John Ernest Elwart | Floor receiving concrete block |
| US7010891B1 (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2006-03-14 | Ryan Clark | Haunch assembly for supporting a concrete slab and method of making the haunch assembly |
| US20030188496A1 (en) * | 2002-04-09 | 2003-10-09 | Williams Jonathan P. | Structural slab and wall assembly for use with expansive soils |
| US7131239B2 (en) * | 2002-04-09 | 2006-11-07 | Williams Jonathan P | Structural slab and wall assembly for use with expansive soils |
| US20030233798A1 (en) * | 2002-06-21 | 2003-12-25 | Berkey John William | Post-tensioned, below-grade concrete foundation system |
| US7003918B2 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2006-02-28 | Williams Jonathan P | Building foundation with unique slab and wall assembly, external sump, and void retention dam |
| US20070269273A1 (en) * | 2003-12-15 | 2007-11-22 | Henderson Allan P | Post-tension pile anchor foundation and method therefor |
| US20080292410A1 (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2008-11-27 | Brown Robert K | Methods and apparatus for foundation systems |
| US20080304919A1 (en) * | 2007-06-08 | 2008-12-11 | Coyle Michael D | Adjustable pier/footing cap for creating an adjustable building foundation |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US8689506B2 (en) | 2014-04-08 |
| US20140208668A1 (en) | 2014-07-31 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8898996B2 (en) | Method for forming a retaining wall, and corresponding retaining wall | |
| US20230091971A1 (en) | System and Method for Protection of Under-Slab Utilities From Changes in Soil Volume | |
| AU2014237379A1 (en) | Precast concrete retaining wall | |
| Roboski | Three-dimensional performance and analyses of deep excavations | |
| JP2006225926A (en) | Banking construction method utilizing backfilling material such as fluidized soil, pit sand, local soil and crushed stone | |
| US20030233798A1 (en) | Post-tensioned, below-grade concrete foundation system | |
| US8689506B2 (en) | Moisture barrier wall | |
| JP4695623B2 (en) | Retaining wall reinforcing structure and construction method thereof | |
| JP3547271B2 (en) | Water body structure using submerged ground driving member | |
| JP2005207132A (en) | Caisson, and revetment for reclamation | |
| Altuntas et al. | Secant pile wall design and construction in Manhattan, New York | |
| Bradbury | 6 The Bullivant systems | |
| JP2016056612A (en) | Foundation structure of horizontally repairable building | |
| CN209353369U (en) | Retaining wall during earthwork excavation construction of foundation pit | |
| JP4344733B2 (en) | Seismic reinforcement structure for existing pile foundation structures | |
| KR200348730Y1 (en) | Square vertical culvert tunnel using steel waterproof plate and concrete | |
| Hon et al. | Design and construction of an underpinning and earth-retaining system for Lehigh Valley Hospital building | |
| Ho | Ground Loss behind Floating Diaphragm Walls in Soft Ground Excavation | |
| Shong | Common Problems of Basement Excavation Projects in Malaysia | |
| Mangushev et al. | Experience of construction of deep ditches for underground constructions in weak soils Saint-Petersburg | |
| JP2024169167A (en) | Buildings and their construction methods | |
| Ramesh et al. | Analysis for Failure Mechanism of Temporary Shoring Structure | |
| Chow et al. | Deep Excavation for Basement via Soil Nailing Method | |
| JP2022091053A (en) | Reinforcement body of earth retaining wall, and installation method of reinforcement body | |
| Abbondanza | Steel innovation: changing the economics of below grade foundations |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, LLC, ARIZONA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FORNATORA, AMIL, MR.;COPPOLA, PHILIP, MR.;REEL/FRAME:023578/0069 Effective date: 20091125 |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
| MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2551) Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
| LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
| STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
| FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20220408 |