US20070044693A1 - Process for improving operation of large-scale combustors - Google Patents
Process for improving operation of large-scale combustors Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070044693A1 US20070044693A1 US11/427,894 US42789406A US2007044693A1 US 20070044693 A1 US20070044693 A1 US 20070044693A1 US 42789406 A US42789406 A US 42789406A US 2007044693 A1 US2007044693 A1 US 2007044693A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- furnace
- targeted
- fuel
- slag
- chemical
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
- C10L10/00—Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes
- C10L10/04—Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes for minimising corrosion or incrustation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
- C10L10/00—Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes
- C10L10/02—Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes for reducing smoke development
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
- C10L9/00—Treating solid fuels to improve their combustion
- C10L9/10—Treating solid fuels to improve their combustion by using additives
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23J—REMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES
- F23J11/00—Devices for conducting smoke or fumes, e.g. flues
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23J—REMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES
- F23J7/00—Arrangement of devices for supplying chemicals to fire
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23G—CREMATION FURNACES; CONSUMING WASTE PRODUCTS BY COMBUSTION
- F23G2201/00—Pretreatment
- F23G2201/70—Blending
- F23G2201/701—Blending with additives
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23G—CREMATION FURNACES; CONSUMING WASTE PRODUCTS BY COMBUSTION
- F23G2207/00—Control
- F23G2207/60—Additives supply
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23G—CREMATION FURNACES; CONSUMING WASTE PRODUCTS BY COMBUSTION
- F23G2900/00—Special features of, or arrangements for incinerators
- F23G2900/55—Controlling; Monitoring or measuring
- F23G2900/55002—Sensing exhaust gas opacity
Definitions
- the invention relates to a process for increasing the heat output of large-scale combustors, such as the type used industrially and by utilities to provide power and incinerate waste.
- heat output is increased while, or plume opacity is mitigated, preferably both, and/or slag and/or corrosion are reduced.
- the invention achieves one or more of these desired results through the use of one or more chemicals, which in one embodiment is a unique combination of combustion catalyst and slag modifier.
- the chemicals are preferably introduced by targeted in-furnace injection, and/or in-body injection.
- the combustion of carbonaceous fuels typically produces a plume arising from the smoke stack and can have opacity ranging from low to high.
- these fuels contain slag-forming materials, and can generate corrosive acids, and unburned carbon, that in combination have a relatively negative effect on the productivity of the boilers, and can corrode the environment and pose a health risk.
- Plume is a problem from an aesthetic standpoint as well as an environmental one. Plume can be objectionable in and of itself and is expensive to treat by conventional technology. The negative effects of plume are considered to be related to the opacity of emissions from power plants. Plume opacity is measured in percent.
- the greater the opacity the more the background behind the plume is obscured and the less light can come through the plume. If none of the background is obscured, then the opacity is 0%. If the entire background is obscured, then the opacity is 100%.
- the visibility impairment effects of power plant plumes can be grouped into three categories.
- Coal and oil fired power plants especially, produce small particles in plumes from when sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) is oxidized to sulfur trioxide (SO 3 ) inside a furnace and boiler, condenses with water (H 2 O) at lower temperatures to become suspended sulfuric acid aerosol particles.
- SO 3 also reacts with alkali metals to form various sulfates. Sulfate particles can significantly contribute to the concentration of very fine particle matter (PM 2.5 ), which is associated with health as well as reduced visibility.
- Desulfurization, e.g., flue gas desulphurization (FGD), of the entire effluent can be used to decrease plume from coal-fired boilers by decreasing the overall SO 2 content of the effluent.
- the invention by decreasing plume opacity, directly affects opacity and is believed to greatly reduce an individual plant contribution to the other two categories of visibility impairment.
- Corrosion typically occurs to a greater degree at the cold end of the combustor, and can create maintenance costs that are desirably avoided. Acid gases and deposits can often be controlled by the addition of chemicals to the combustion chamber or the fuel. The introduction of chemicals in this manner is often very inefficient and increases the amount of ash that must be disposed. Corrosion control is too often a choice between polluting byproducts.
- combustion catalysts can also be effective in some cases; however, combustion catalysts cannot always be used effectively or efficiently due to fuel and/or equipment limitations.
- combustion catalysts proposed in the art are the metal compounds in the form of basic metal salts, generally calcium, iron, copper, barium, manganese and/or magnesium compounds.
- the metal compounds are delivered as metal salts.
- the anionic portion of the salt can be hydroxyl, oxide, carbonate, borate, nitrate, etc.
- Carbon in the ash can decrease commercial value of the ash, which can be used in concrete if the LOI can be reduced to less than 2%.
- the art is in need of a process that can efficiently deal with plume, while preferably permitting efficient combustion with lower LOI carbon, lower excess air, lower CO, and/or lower NO x , and/or controlling slag, and/or corrosion. It has now been observed in some cases that the same treatments effective for plume reduction can also result in increased heat production by a combustor. This is a result which goes far beyond the aesthetics and is believed to provide added incentives for combustor operators to pursue the treatments found effective and, thereby, reduce plume while gaining significant economic rewards.
- a yet further, but related, object is to mitigate the costs resulting from any or all of the aforementioned problems by reducing their occurrence.
- a yet further object is to increase combustor output.
- the present invention provides an improved process for improving the operation of combustors, comprising: burning a carbonaceous fuel in the presence a combustion catalyst in the fuel or injected into the combustor apart from the fuel; determining combustion conditions within a combustor that can benefit from targeted in-furnace treatment chemical; locating introduction points on the furnace wall where introduction of targeted in-furnace treatment chemical could be accomplished; and, based on the determinations of the previous step, introducing targeted in-furnace treatment chemical.
- the invention provides a process, which comprises: burning a carbonaceous fuel in the presence of a combustion catalyst in the fuel or injected into the combustor apart from the fuel and a slag and/or corrosion controlling chemical; determining combustion conditions within a combustor that can benefit from targeted in-furnace treatment chemical for control of slag and/or corrosion; locating introduction points on the furnace wall where introduction of targeted in-furnace treatment chemical could be accomplished; and, based on the determinations of the previous step, introducing targeted in-furnace treatment chemical.
- a process for increasing heat output of a combustor burning carbonaceous fuel in a flame comprises: determining the positions for effective introduction of slag controlling chemical; based on the determination of the previous step, introducing targeted slag controlling chemical treatment in an amount effective to reduce slag; and introducing a combustion catalyst into the flame in an amount effective to improve combustion.
- the invention also provides a process of system analysis for pollutant control.
- the effectiveness of targeted in furnace injection, in fuel introduction and in furnace introduction of slag and/or corrosion and/or plume control chemicals are determined, as are the effectiveness of targeted in furnace injection, in fuel introduction and in furnace introduction of combustion catalysts.
- the effectiveness of various combinations of the above treatments are determined, and a treatment regimen employing one or more of the above treatments is selected.
- Preferred treatment regimens will contain at least two and preferably three of the treatments.
- the invention has several preferred aspects, which are described in greater detail below.
- the FIGURE is a graphical presentation of the results of Example 3, wherein a combustion catalyst and a slag-controlling chemical are added with the result that the heat output of the furnace is increased.
- the invention relates to a process for increasing the heat output, i.e., megawatt generation in the case of boilers used for electricity generation or steam output otherwise, of a combustor is increased, preferably while plume is mitigated, by targeting treatment chemicals to locations in a furnace.
- the invention can accomplish this by improving heat output from the fuel in the region of the combustor optimum for heat recovery and also by maintaining good heat transfer characteristics for the heat exchange surfaces.
- the invention is also effective in reducing plume, preferably while improving combustion and/or reducing slag and/or corrosion in large-scale combustors, such as of the type used industrially and by utilities to provide power and incinerate waste.
- the invention addresses these problems in a manner that is economically attractive and surprising in effectiveness.
- the invention provides an improved process for improving the operation of combustors. Important to the process is the determination of combustion conditions within a combustor that can affect plume.
- the invention can be used to treat plume alone or with one or more of LOI carbon, slagging and corrosion in the absence of treatment.
- the process will entail burning a carbonaceous fuel with or without a combustion catalyst and introducing targeted in-furnace treatment chemical directed at problem areas or to locations where the chemical can do the most good. This latter step will require locating introduction points on the furnace wall where introduction of chemicals to control plume could be accomplished.
- the invention thus, can be facilitated by the use of computational fluid dynamics and modeling or observation according to the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 5,740,745 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,894,806.
- those skilled in the art will be able to define other techniques effective for locating the problem areas and, from them, determining the best locations to introduce chemical.
- the teachings of these patents will not be repeated here, but are incorporated by reference in their entireties to explain suitable techniques effective for the invention.
- combustion catalysts e.g., a member selected from the group consisting of potassium, barium, calcium, cerium, iron, copper, zinc, magnesium, manganese, and mixtures of any of these, etc.
- the slag-reducing agent is most desirably introduced as an aqueous treatment solution, a slurry in the case of magnesium oxide or magnesium hydroxide. The concentration of the slurry will be determined as necessary to assure proper direction of the treatment solution to the desired area in the boiler.
- Typical concentrations vary from 1 to 100%, e.g., and are typically within the range of from about 51 to about 80% active chemical by weight of the slurry or solution, preferably from about 5 to about 30%.
- Other effective metal oxides and hydroxides e.g., copper, titanium and blends
- copper oxychloride, copper carbonate, iron oxide, organometallics of iron, copper, calcium supplied in a dosage to make 1 to 1000 ppm (typical 40-50 ppm) as active metal in the fuel by weight.
- combustion catalyst with the fuel or separately from the fuel as a targeted in-furnace chemical effective for improving the oxidation of the fuel, in combination with the targeted in-furnace treatment chemical.
- the combustion catalyst will be any material effective for the intended purpose and preferably comprises a metal compound wherein the metal is selected from the group consisting of copper, iron, magnesium and calcium. It can include fuel dispersible or fuel soluble compositions.
- chemical compounds which affect the combustion process such as salts of organic acids, such as naphthenates, octoates, tallates, salts of sulfonic acids, saturated or unsaturated fatty acids, such as oleic acid, and tall oil, with metals from the group of K, Ba, Mg, Ca, Ce, Fe, Mn, Zn; rare earth metals; organometallic compounds, such as carbonyl compounds, mixed cyclopentadienyl carbonyl compounds, or aromatic complexes of the transition metals Fe or Mn, and mixtures of any of these.
- One preferred catalyst composition is calcium nitrate which can be supplied in the form 50% to 75%, e.g., typically up to 66 or 70%, % water solution at a dosage rate of from 1 to 1000 ppm (@ ⁇ 0.5 lb/ton or 40-50 ppm as active metal) as active metal in the fuel by weight. Variation in the amounts will be initially determined by calculation and adjusted following testing. Variations of up to 100% of the indicated values will be expected, and up to about 25% of the values will be more typical.
- the process of the invention will entail, in some preferred embodiments, the use of an in-furnace treatment chemical added to the carbonaceous fuel.
- the chemical can be the same or different from the targeted in-furnace injection chemical.
- total magnesium use can be about 0.6 kg per 1000 kg of fuel with 30-40% going low in the furnace or in the fuel and 60-70% going targeted higher in the furnace with targeted in-furnace injection (TIFI).
- the combustion catalyst is typically introduced at a dosage rate of from about 0.1 to about 2.0, e.g., about 0.2 to about 0.8, kg per 1000 kg of carbonaceous fuel burned in the combustor.
- the targeted treatment chemical is introduced into the furnace at a dosage rate of from about 0.2 to about 1.2, e.g., from about 0.32 to about 0.46, kg per 1000 kg of carbonaceous fuel burned in the combustor Variation in the amounts will be initially determined by calculation and adjusted following testing. Variations of up to 100% of the indicated values will be expected, and up to about 25% of the values will be more typical.
- Targeted injection of the in-furnace injection chemical will require locating introduction points on the furnace wall where introduction of targeted in-furnace treatment chemical could be accomplished. And, based on the determinations of this procedure, targeted in-furnace treatment chemical is introduced, such as in the form of a spray.
- the droplets are desirably in an effective range of sizes traveling at suitable velocities and directions to be effective as can be determined by those skilled in the art. These drops interact with the flue gas and evaporate at a rate dependent on their size and trajectory and the temperatures along the trajectory. Proper spray patterns result in highly efficient chemical distributions.
- a frequently used spray model is the PSI-Cell model for droplet evaporation and motion, which is convenient for iterative CFD solutions of steady state processes.
- the PSI-Cell method uses the gas properties from the fluid dynamics calculations to predict droplet trajectories and evaporation rates from mass, momentum, and energy balances.
- the momentum, heat, and mass changes of the droplets are then included as source terms for the next iteration of the fluid dynamics calculations, hence after enough iterations both the fluid properties and the droplet trajectories converge to a steady solution.
- Sprays are treated as a series of individual droplets having different initial velocities and droplet sizes emanating from a central point.
- droplet trajectory angle Correlations between droplet trajectory angle and the size or mass flow distribution are included, and the droplet frequency is determined from the droplet size and mass flow rate at each angle.
- the model should further predict multi component droplet behavior.
- the equations for the force, mass, and energy balances are supplemented with flash calculations, providing the instantaneous velocity, droplet size, temperature, and chemical composition over the lifetime of the droplet.
- the momentum, mass, and energy contributions of atomizing fluid are also included.
- the correlations for droplet size, spray angle, mass flow droplet size distributions, and droplet velocities are found from laboratory measurements using laser light scattering and the Doppler techniques.
- Characteristics for many types of nozzles under various operating conditions have been determined and are used to prescribe parameters for the CFD model calculations. When operated optimally, chemical efficiency is increased and the chances for impingement of droplets directly onto heat exchange and other equipment surfaces is greatly reduced. Average droplet sizes within the range of from 20 to 1000 microns are typical, and most typically fall within the range of from about 100 to 600 microns.
- injectors for introducing active chemicals for reducing slag in accordance with the invention employ multiple levels of injection to best optimize the spray pattern and assure targeting the chemical to the point that it is needed.
- the invention can be carried out with a single zone, e.g., in the upper furnace, where conditions permit or physical limitations dictate.
- the total amount of the in-furnace treatment chemical introduced into the combustion gases from all points should be sufficient to obtain a reduction in plume opacity and/or corrosion and/or the rate of slag build-up and/or the frequency of clean-up.
- the build-up of slag results in increased pressure drop through the furnace, e.g., through the generating bank. Dosing rates can be varied to achieve long-term control of the noted parameters or at higher rates to reduce slag deposits already in place.
- plume can be well controlled at the same time as corrosion, slag LOI carbon, and/or SO 3 .
- the net effect in many cases is a synergy in operation that saves money and/or increases efficiency in terms of lower stack temperatures, cleaner air heater surfaces, lower corrosion rates in the air heaters and ducts, lower excess O 2 , cleaner water walls, resulting in lower furnace exit temperatures and cleaner heat transfer surfaces in the convection sections of the boiler.
- the process of the invention can be looked at from the unique perspective of system analysis.
- the effectiveness of targeted in furnace injection, in fuel introduction and in furnace introduction of slag and/or corrosion and/or plume control chemicals are determined, as are the effectiveness of targeted in furnace injection, in fuel introduction and in furnace introduction of combustion catalysts.
- the effectiveness of various combinations of the above treatments are determined, and a treatment regimen employing one or more of the above treatments is selected.
- Preferred treatment regimens will contain at least two and preferably three of the treatments.
- a determination can be any evaluation whether or not assisted by computer or the techniques of the above-referenced patents.
- it may involve direct or remote observation during operation or down times.
- targeted injection is evaluated along with nontargeted introduction, especially of a combination of combustion catalysts and slagging and/or corrosion and/or plume control chemicals.
- Chemical utilization and boiler maintenance can improved as LOI carbon, slagging and/or corrosion are also controlled.
- magnesium hydroxide was fed to the fuel oil for a residual oil fired electric power plant boiler at a rate of 0.20 kg per 1000 kg.
- Magnesium hydroxide was also directed into the boiler at positions determined by computational fluid dynamic modeling as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,894,806, at a rate of 0.20 kg per 1000 kg.
- a calcium nitrate combustion catalyst was added to the fuel oil at a rate of 0.25 kg per 1000 kg.
- the magnesium hydroxide fed the fuel oil performed two roles: it protected the lower furnace against slagging and hot-side corrosion by the mechanism of tying up vanadium in the oil. The magnesium hydroxide also prevented fouling caused by the catalyst from affecting lower furnace cleanliness.
- Example 1 A similar set as in Example 1 is run with similar treatment to reduce opacities from 30% to 7%.
- the combustion catalyst is fed at a rate of 0.25 kg per 1000 kg of fuel
- the in-furnace injection chemical is Mg, which is fed at a rate of 0.35 kg per 1000 kg of fuel.
- an injection of Mg(OH)2 slurry containing copper combustion catalyst increased MW generation while controlling furnace exit gas temperature (FEGT) and steam temperature.
- the power generation of 150 MW coal fired utility boiler was limited to about 140 MW due to high FEGT and main steam temperature.
- a chemical treatment mixture of Mg and Cu compositions (comprised of magnesium hydroxide and copper carbonate, with 19% magnesium and 6% copper based on the weight of the slurry) was injected through the lowest elevation Targeted In-Furnace Injection ports. These and other targeted in-furnace injection ports were previously determined through a CFD modeling study.
- the introduction of treatment chemicals was correlated with a drop in steam temperature for a given production level, allowing for a MW production increase. Further, by comparison to other periods burning the same coal without treatment, the FEGT at the higher MW with treatment is lower than would be expected based on non-treated periods, assuming a linearly extrapolated trend.
- the FIGURE graphically shows gross combustor output in MW versus catalyst feed.
- Combustion catalysts increase the combustion reaction rate. This increased rate can lower CO emissions and LOI, contain the flame to lower furnace, and increase the heat generation in the lower furnace. If the flame reaches the upper furnace and superheaters, heavy slagging, metal fatigue, and corrosion can occur.
- Mg(OH) 2 has successfully reduced slagging and other deposits on water/steam tubes on many coal fired boilers.
- MgO prevents the slags from forming hard and uniform deposits.
- the treated deposits are typically friable and easily removed by sootblowing. Cleaner water walls enhance heat absorption in the lower furnace.
- a combustion catalyst improves the combustion efficiency but cannot maintain the FEGT and main steam temperature if water walls are slagged.
- clean water walls cannot lower the FEGT and main steam temperatures if poor combustion causes the flame to elongate and reach the upper furnace. Therefore, the observed MW increase without FEGT and main steam temperature excursions is likely to be the result of both increased heat generation (combustion catalyst) and increased heat absorption (Mg(OH) 2 ) in the lower furnace.
- the results are surprising and of greater commercial value than might be expected by combining the two treatments.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Catalysts (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/754,072 filed Jan. 8, 2004.
- The invention relates to a process for increasing the heat output of large-scale combustors, such as the type used industrially and by utilities to provide power and incinerate waste. According to the invention, heat output is increased while, or plume opacity is mitigated, preferably both, and/or slag and/or corrosion are reduced. The invention achieves one or more of these desired results through the use of one or more chemicals, which in one embodiment is a unique combination of combustion catalyst and slag modifier. The chemicals are preferably introduced by targeted in-furnace injection, and/or in-body injection.
- The combustion of carbonaceous fuels, such as heavy fuel oils, coals, refinery coke, biomass and municipal and industrial waste, is typically less efficient than would be desired; and in some cases the imposition of pollution control requirements is viewed as a cost penalty because the combustors are less able to efficiently produce electricity or steam. The heat outputs of combustors are often modified by using alternative fuels, often reduced. There is a need to improve heat output from the fuel in the region of the combustor optimum for heat recovery and also maintain good heat transfer characteristics for the heat exchange surfaces so that heat output can be improved, especially while pollution control is effected or maintained while using alternative fuels.
- The combustion of carbonaceous fuels typically produces a plume arising from the smoke stack and can have opacity ranging from low to high. In addition, these fuels contain slag-forming materials, and can generate corrosive acids, and unburned carbon, that in combination have a relatively negative effect on the productivity of the boilers, and can corrode the environment and pose a health risk. Plume is a problem from an aesthetic standpoint as well as an environmental one. Plume can be objectionable in and of itself and is expensive to treat by conventional technology. The negative effects of plume are considered to be related to the opacity of emissions from power plants. Plume opacity is measured in percent. Simply, the greater the opacity, the more the background behind the plume is obscured and the less light can come through the plume. If none of the background is obscured, then the opacity is 0%. If the entire background is obscured, then the opacity is 100%.
- The visibility impairment effects of power plant plumes can be grouped into three categories. The first, opacity, occurs very near the stack and is determined by EPA Reference Method 9 is found in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. It was adopted as a visible emissions inspection method in an effort to standardize the training and certification of observers and to ensure that reliable and repeatable opacity observations could be conducted anywhere in the United States. The second, plume blight, occurs at distances from 2 km to 1 day's travel downwind. Blight happens before the plume has been dispersed so widely that it is indistinct from the background. Regional haze is the effect of the plume on a broader scale and is obviously of critical concern. Coal and oil fired power plants, especially, produce small particles in plumes from when sulfur dioxide (SO2) is oxidized to sulfur trioxide (SO3) inside a furnace and boiler, condenses with water (H2O) at lower temperatures to become suspended sulfuric acid aerosol particles. SO3 also reacts with alkali metals to form various sulfates. Sulfate particles can significantly contribute to the concentration of very fine particle matter (PM2.5), which is associated with health as well as reduced visibility. Desulfurization, e.g., flue gas desulphurization (FGD), of the entire effluent can be used to decrease plume from coal-fired boilers by decreasing the overall SO2 content of the effluent. The invention, by decreasing plume opacity, directly affects opacity and is believed to greatly reduce an individual plant contribution to the other two categories of visibility impairment.
- While plume opacity is of concern from an external pollution position, slagging and some of the other problems caused by combustion can affect efficiency—therefore, economics, which are a severe threat to older power plants, especially, where efficiency is required for pollution controls to be affordable for maintaining the plants in operation. Slagging deposits are sometimes extremely difficult to remove by conventional techniques such as soot blowing. Slag buildup results in a loss of heat transfer throughout the system, increases draft loss, limits gas throughput and is a factor in tube failure due to erosion from excessive sootblowing. A variety of other procedures are known for adding treatment chemicals to the fuel or into the furnace in quantities sufficient to treat all of the ash produced, in the hope of solving the slagging problem. Typical chemicals include magnesium oxide and magnesium hydroxide for the above reasons and various combustion catalysts, such as copper, iron, calcium, barium and/or manganese to improve the burning of the fuel.
- Corrosion, typically occurs to a greater degree at the cold end of the combustor, and can create maintenance costs that are desirably avoided. Acid gases and deposits can often be controlled by the addition of chemicals to the combustion chamber or the fuel. The introduction of chemicals in this manner is often very inefficient and increases the amount of ash that must be disposed. Corrosion control is too often a choice between polluting byproducts.
- The art has endeavored to solve slagging and/or corrosion problems by introducing various chemicals, such as magnesium oxide or hydroxide. Magnesium hydroxide has the ability to survive the hot environment of the furnace and react with the deposit-forming compounds, raising their ash fusion temperature and thereby modifying the texture of the resulting deposits. Unfortunately, the introduction of the chemicals has been very expensive due to poor utilization of the chemicals, much simply going to waste and some reacting with hot ash that would not otherwise cause a problem. U.S. Pat. No. 5,740,745 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,894,806 deal with this problem, by introducing chemical in one or more stages to directly address predicted or observed slagging and/or corrosion.
- The presence of unburned carbon in the ash is an indication that combustion is not efficient and can cause operational problems. Increasing the amount of air used for combustion can reduce carbon in the ash, often referred to as LOI carbon (for loss on ignition, denoting a weight loss of ash due to combustion of its carbon content). This can be effective in some situations, but the use of excess air always decreases boiler efficiency. Also, excess air increases SO2 to SO3 conversion, causing additional acid aerosol plume and may also increase NOx levels. The use of combustion catalysts can also be effective in some cases; however, combustion catalysts cannot always be used effectively or efficiently due to fuel and/or equipment limitations. Among combustion catalysts proposed in the art are the metal compounds in the form of basic metal salts, generally calcium, iron, copper, barium, manganese and/or magnesium compounds. Generally the metal compounds are delivered as metal salts. The anionic portion of the salt can be hydroxyl, oxide, carbonate, borate, nitrate, etc. Carbon in the ash can decrease commercial value of the ash, which can be used in concrete if the LOI can be reduced to less than 2%.
- The art is in need of a process that can efficiently deal with plume, while preferably permitting efficient combustion with lower LOI carbon, lower excess air, lower CO, and/or lower NOx, and/or controlling slag, and/or corrosion. It has now been observed in some cases that the same treatments effective for plume reduction can also result in increased heat production by a combustor. This is a result which goes far beyond the aesthetics and is believed to provide added incentives for combustor operators to pursue the treatments found effective and, thereby, reduce plume while gaining significant economic rewards.
- It is an object of the invention to improve the operation of large-scale combustors by efficiently mitigating plume.
- It is another object of the invention to improve the operation of large-scale combustors by increasing heat output.
- It is another object of the invention to improve the operation of large-scale combustors by efficiently mitigating plume, while preferably controlling slag and/or corrosion at the same time that LOI carbon is mitigated.
- It is another object of the invention to enable the treatment of many boilers with an effectiveness that has heretofore escaped those skilled in the art.
- It is a further object of the invention to mitigate plume with reduced chemical treatment costs in many boilers and synergies in others.
- A yet further, but related, object is to mitigate the costs resulting from any or all of the aforementioned problems by reducing their occurrence.
- A yet further object is to increase combustor output.
- These and other objects are achieved by the present invention which provides an improved process for improving the operation of combustors, comprising: burning a carbonaceous fuel in the presence a combustion catalyst in the fuel or injected into the combustor apart from the fuel; determining combustion conditions within a combustor that can benefit from targeted in-furnace treatment chemical; locating introduction points on the furnace wall where introduction of targeted in-furnace treatment chemical could be accomplished; and, based on the determinations of the previous step, introducing targeted in-furnace treatment chemical.
- In another embodiment, the invention provides a process, which comprises: burning a carbonaceous fuel in the presence of a combustion catalyst in the fuel or injected into the combustor apart from the fuel and a slag and/or corrosion controlling chemical; determining combustion conditions within a combustor that can benefit from targeted in-furnace treatment chemical for control of slag and/or corrosion; locating introduction points on the furnace wall where introduction of targeted in-furnace treatment chemical could be accomplished; and, based on the determinations of the previous step, introducing targeted in-furnace treatment chemical.
- In one preferred embodiment, a process for increasing heat output of a combustor burning carbonaceous fuel in a flame, comprises: determining the positions for effective introduction of slag controlling chemical; based on the determination of the previous step, introducing targeted slag controlling chemical treatment in an amount effective to reduce slag; and introducing a combustion catalyst into the flame in an amount effective to improve combustion.
- The invention also provides a process of system analysis for pollutant control. According to this aspect of the invention, the effectiveness of targeted in furnace injection, in fuel introduction and in furnace introduction of slag and/or corrosion and/or plume control chemicals are determined, as are the effectiveness of targeted in furnace injection, in fuel introduction and in furnace introduction of combustion catalysts. Then, the effectiveness of various combinations of the above treatments are determined, and a treatment regimen employing one or more of the above treatments is selected. Preferred treatment regimens will contain at least two and preferably three of the treatments.
- The invention has several preferred aspects, which are described in greater detail below.
- The invention will be better understood and its advantages more apparent from the following detailed description, especially when read in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
- The FIGURE is a graphical presentation of the results of Example 3, wherein a combustion catalyst and a slag-controlling chemical are added with the result that the heat output of the furnace is increased.
- The invention relates to a process for increasing the heat output, i.e., megawatt generation in the case of boilers used for electricity generation or steam output otherwise, of a combustor is increased, preferably while plume is mitigated, by targeting treatment chemicals to locations in a furnace. The invention can accomplish this by improving heat output from the fuel in the region of the combustor optimum for heat recovery and also by maintaining good heat transfer characteristics for the heat exchange surfaces. The invention is also effective in reducing plume, preferably while improving combustion and/or reducing slag and/or corrosion in large-scale combustors, such as of the type used industrially and by utilities to provide power and incinerate waste. The following description will illustrate the invention with reference to a power plant type boiler fired with heavy, e.g., number 6, fuel oil. It will be understood however, that any other combustor fueled with any other carbonaceous fuel and susceptible to the problems treated by the invention could benefit from the invention. Without meaning to be limiting of the type of fuel, carbonaceous materials such as fuel oil, gas, coal, waste, including municipal and industrial, sludge, biomass and/or synfuels, and the like, can be employed.
- In general, the combustion of carbonaceous fuels, such as heavy fuel oils, coal and municipal and industrial waste, result in effluents having significant plume opacity and can cause slag formation, corrosive acids, that individually and in combination have relatively negative effect on the productivity and social acceptability of the boilers. The invention addresses these problems in a manner that is economically attractive and surprising in effectiveness. The invention provides an improved process for improving the operation of combustors. Important to the process is the determination of combustion conditions within a combustor that can affect plume. The invention can be used to treat plume alone or with one or more of LOI carbon, slagging and corrosion in the absence of treatment.
- The process will entail burning a carbonaceous fuel with or without a combustion catalyst and introducing targeted in-furnace treatment chemical directed at problem areas or to locations where the chemical can do the most good. This latter step will require locating introduction points on the furnace wall where introduction of chemicals to control plume could be accomplished. The invention, thus, can be facilitated by the use of computational fluid dynamics and modeling or observation according to the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 5,740,745 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,894,806. In addition to the specifically identified techniques, those skilled in the art will be able to define other techniques effective for locating the problem areas and, from them, determining the best locations to introduce chemical. The teachings of these patents will not be repeated here, but are incorporated by reference in their entireties to explain suitable techniques effective for the invention.
- Among the preferred targeted in-furnace injection chemicals are combustion catalysts (e.g., a member selected from the group consisting of potassium, barium, calcium, cerium, iron, copper, zinc, magnesium, manganese, and mixtures of any of these, etc.) in various forms, and the oxides and hydroxides of magnesium for example, in the form of slurries or solutions in water or other suitable vehicle. The slag-reducing agent is most desirably introduced as an aqueous treatment solution, a slurry in the case of magnesium oxide or magnesium hydroxide. The concentration of the slurry will be determined as necessary to assure proper direction of the treatment solution to the desired area in the boiler. Typical concentrations vary from 1 to 100%, e.g., and are typically within the range of from about 51 to about 80% active chemical by weight of the slurry or solution, preferably from about 5 to about 30%. Other effective metal oxides and hydroxides (e.g., copper, titanium and blends) are known and can be employed. These chemicals, or others, such as copper oxychloride, copper carbonate, iron oxide, organometallics of iron, copper, calcium, supplied in a dosage to make 1 to 1000 ppm (typical 40-50 ppm) as active metal in the fuel by weight.
- Important to the invention and a departure from known prior art in the field, is the introduction of a combustion catalyst with the fuel or separately from the fuel as a targeted in-furnace chemical effective for improving the oxidation of the fuel, in combination with the targeted in-furnace treatment chemical. The combustion catalyst will be any material effective for the intended purpose and preferably comprises a metal compound wherein the metal is selected from the group consisting of copper, iron, magnesium and calcium. It can include fuel dispersible or fuel soluble compositions. Among these, are chemical compounds which affect the combustion process, such as salts of organic acids, such as naphthenates, octoates, tallates, salts of sulfonic acids, saturated or unsaturated fatty acids, such as oleic acid, and tall oil, with metals from the group of K, Ba, Mg, Ca, Ce, Fe, Mn, Zn; rare earth metals; organometallic compounds, such as carbonyl compounds, mixed cyclopentadienyl carbonyl compounds, or aromatic complexes of the transition metals Fe or Mn, and mixtures of any of these. One preferred catalyst composition is calcium nitrate which can be supplied in the form 50% to 75%, e.g., typically up to 66 or 70%, % water solution at a dosage rate of from 1 to 1000 ppm (@˜0.5 lb/ton or 40-50 ppm as active metal) as active metal in the fuel by weight. Variation in the amounts will be initially determined by calculation and adjusted following testing. Variations of up to 100% of the indicated values will be expected, and up to about 25% of the values will be more typical.
- In addition to the addition of combustion catalyst to the fuel, and a targeted in-furnace addition of chemical, the process of the invention will entail, in some preferred embodiments, the use of an in-furnace treatment chemical added to the carbonaceous fuel. The chemical can be the same or different from the targeted in-furnace injection chemical. In one scenario, total magnesium use can be about 0.6 kg per 1000 kg of fuel with 30-40% going low in the furnace or in the fuel and 60-70% going targeted higher in the furnace with targeted in-furnace injection (TIFI). The combustion catalyst is typically introduced at a dosage rate of from about 0.1 to about 2.0, e.g., about 0.2 to about 0.8, kg per 1000 kg of carbonaceous fuel burned in the combustor. In some preferred configurations, the targeted treatment chemical is introduced into the furnace at a dosage rate of from about 0.2 to about 1.2, e.g., from about 0.32 to about 0.46, kg per 1000 kg of carbonaceous fuel burned in the combustor Variation in the amounts will be initially determined by calculation and adjusted following testing. Variations of up to 100% of the indicated values will be expected, and up to about 25% of the values will be more typical.
- Targeted injection of the in-furnace injection chemical will require locating introduction points on the furnace wall where introduction of targeted in-furnace treatment chemical could be accomplished. And, based on the determinations of this procedure, targeted in-furnace treatment chemical is introduced, such as in the form of a spray. The droplets are desirably in an effective range of sizes traveling at suitable velocities and directions to be effective as can be determined by those skilled in the art. These drops interact with the flue gas and evaporate at a rate dependent on their size and trajectory and the temperatures along the trajectory. Proper spray patterns result in highly efficient chemical distributions.
- As described in the above-identified patents, a frequently used spray model is the PSI-Cell model for droplet evaporation and motion, which is convenient for iterative CFD solutions of steady state processes. The PSI-Cell method uses the gas properties from the fluid dynamics calculations to predict droplet trajectories and evaporation rates from mass, momentum, and energy balances. The momentum, heat, and mass changes of the droplets are then included as source terms for the next iteration of the fluid dynamics calculations, hence after enough iterations both the fluid properties and the droplet trajectories converge to a steady solution. Sprays are treated as a series of individual droplets having different initial velocities and droplet sizes emanating from a central point.
- Correlations between droplet trajectory angle and the size or mass flow distribution are included, and the droplet frequency is determined from the droplet size and mass flow rate at each angle. For the purposes of this invention, the model should further predict multi component droplet behavior. The equations for the force, mass, and energy balances are supplemented with flash calculations, providing the instantaneous velocity, droplet size, temperature, and chemical composition over the lifetime of the droplet. The momentum, mass, and energy contributions of atomizing fluid are also included. The correlations for droplet size, spray angle, mass flow droplet size distributions, and droplet velocities are found from laboratory measurements using laser light scattering and the Doppler techniques. Characteristics for many types of nozzles under various operating conditions have been determined and are used to prescribe parameters for the CFD model calculations. When operated optimally, chemical efficiency is increased and the chances for impingement of droplets directly onto heat exchange and other equipment surfaces is greatly reduced. Average droplet sizes within the range of from 20 to 1000 microns are typical, and most typically fall within the range of from about 100 to 600 microns.
- One preferred arrangement of injectors for introducing active chemicals for reducing slag in accordance with the invention employ multiple levels of injection to best optimize the spray pattern and assure targeting the chemical to the point that it is needed. However, the invention can be carried out with a single zone, e.g., in the upper furnace, where conditions permit or physical limitations dictate. Typically, however, it is preferred to employ multiple stages, or use an additive in the fuel and the same or different one in the upper furnace. This permits both the injection of different compositions simultaneously or the introduction of compositions at different locations or with different injectors to follow the temperature variations which follow changes in load.
- The total amount of the in-furnace treatment chemical introduced into the combustion gases from all points should be sufficient to obtain a reduction in plume opacity and/or corrosion and/or the rate of slag build-up and/or the frequency of clean-up. The build-up of slag results in increased pressure drop through the furnace, e.g., through the generating bank. Dosing rates can be varied to achieve long-term control of the noted parameters or at higher rates to reduce slag deposits already in place.
- It is a distinct advantage of the invention that plume can be well controlled at the same time as corrosion, slag LOI carbon, and/or SO3. The net effect in many cases is a synergy in operation that saves money and/or increases efficiency in terms of lower stack temperatures, cleaner air heater surfaces, lower corrosion rates in the air heaters and ducts, lower excess O2, cleaner water walls, resulting in lower furnace exit temperatures and cleaner heat transfer surfaces in the convection sections of the boiler.
- The process of the invention can be looked at from the unique perspective of system analysis. According to this aspect of the invention, the effectiveness of targeted in furnace injection, in fuel introduction and in furnace introduction of slag and/or corrosion and/or plume control chemicals are determined, as are the effectiveness of targeted in furnace injection, in fuel introduction and in furnace introduction of combustion catalysts. Then, the effectiveness of various combinations of the above treatments are determined, and a treatment regimen employing one or more of the above treatments is selected. Preferred treatment regimens will contain at least two and preferably three of the treatments. In each case, a determination can be any evaluation whether or not assisted by computer or the techniques of the above-referenced patents. In addition, it may involve direct or remote observation during operation or down times. The key factor here and a departure from the prior art is that targeted injection is evaluated along with nontargeted introduction, especially of a combination of combustion catalysts and slagging and/or corrosion and/or plume control chemicals. Chemical utilization and boiler maintenance can improved as LOI carbon, slagging and/or corrosion are also controlled.
- The following examples are provided to further illustrate and explain the invention, without being limiting in any regard. Unless otherwise indicated, all parts and percentages are based on the weight of the composition at the particular point of reference.
- In this example, magnesium hydroxide was fed to the fuel oil for a residual oil fired electric power plant boiler at a rate of 0.20 kg per 1000 kg. Magnesium hydroxide was also directed into the boiler at positions determined by computational fluid dynamic modeling as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,894,806, at a rate of 0.20 kg per 1000 kg. In addition, a calcium nitrate combustion catalyst was added to the fuel oil at a rate of 0.25 kg per 1000 kg. The magnesium hydroxide fed the fuel oil performed two roles: it protected the lower furnace against slagging and hot-side corrosion by the mechanism of tying up vanadium in the oil. The magnesium hydroxide also prevented fouling caused by the catalyst from affecting lower furnace cleanliness. Most catalysts used for fossil fuels can also cause fouling in the lower furnace. Data showed base line opacities of 25% opacity and excess O2 levels of 1.5%-2.0%. When the invention was introduced after a CFD model was run, opacity dropped to approximately 4.0% and excess O2 was lowered to approximately 0.5%. It was observed that such operation on the unit had never been achieved before, as the fuel analysis is typically 250 ppm vanadium, 2.0% sulfur and 12% asphaltenes, which makes it impossible to achieve these results with in-body injection alone.
- A similar set as in Example 1 is run with similar treatment to reduce opacities from 30% to 7%. In this case, the combustion catalyst is fed at a rate of 0.25 kg per 1000 kg of fuel, and the in-furnace injection chemical is Mg, which is fed at a rate of 0.35 kg per 1000 kg of fuel.
- In this example, an injection of Mg(OH)2 slurry containing copper combustion catalyst increased MW generation while controlling furnace exit gas temperature (FEGT) and steam temperature. The power generation of 150 MW coal fired utility boiler was limited to about 140 MW due to high FEGT and main steam temperature. To overcome this limitation, a chemical treatment mixture of Mg and Cu compositions (comprised of magnesium hydroxide and copper carbonate, with 19% magnesium and 6% copper based on the weight of the slurry) was injected through the lowest elevation Targeted In-Furnace Injection ports. These and other targeted in-furnace injection ports were previously determined through a CFD modeling study.
- With the initial start of Catalyst feed, the gross MW generation increased from increased coal flow rates. The main steam temperature and FEGT stayed within the maximum allowed limit throughout the test. This test was repeated on the following day with a similar result.
- The introduction of treatment chemicals was correlated with a drop in steam temperature for a given production level, allowing for a MW production increase. Further, by comparison to other periods burning the same coal without treatment, the FEGT at the higher MW with treatment is lower than would be expected based on non-treated periods, assuming a linearly extrapolated trend. The FIGURE graphically shows gross combustor output in MW versus catalyst feed.
- While not wanting to be bound by any theory, we believe we understand how this combination of treatments provides the unexpected increase in heat output for the combustor. Combustion catalysts increase the combustion reaction rate. This increased rate can lower CO emissions and LOI, contain the flame to lower furnace, and increase the heat generation in the lower furnace. If the flame reaches the upper furnace and superheaters, heavy slagging, metal fatigue, and corrosion can occur.
- Injection of Mg(OH)2 has successfully reduced slagging and other deposits on water/steam tubes on many coal fired boilers. MgO prevents the slags from forming hard and uniform deposits. The treated deposits are typically friable and easily removed by sootblowing. Cleaner water walls enhance heat absorption in the lower furnace.
- A combination of these two effects can explain the observed phenomenon. A combustion catalyst improves the combustion efficiency but cannot maintain the FEGT and main steam temperature if water walls are slagged. On the other hand, clean water walls cannot lower the FEGT and main steam temperatures if poor combustion causes the flame to elongate and reach the upper furnace. Therefore, the observed MW increase without FEGT and main steam temperature excursions is likely to be the result of both increased heat generation (combustion catalyst) and increased heat absorption (Mg(OH)2) in the lower furnace. Whatever the explanation, the results are surprising and of greater commercial value than might be expected by combining the two treatments.
- The above description is for the purpose of teaching the person of ordinary skill in the art how to practice the invention. It is not intended to detail all of those obvious modifications and variations, which will become apparent to the skilled worker upon reading the description. It is intended, however, that all such obvious modifications and variations be included within the scope of the invention which is defined by the following claims. The claims are meant to cover the claimed components and steps in any sequence which is effective to meet the objectives there intended, unless the context specifically indicates the contrary.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/427,894 US20070044693A1 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2006-06-30 | Process for improving operation of large-scale combustors |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/754,072 US7162960B2 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2004-01-08 | Process for reducing plume opacity |
| US11/427,894 US20070044693A1 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2006-06-30 | Process for improving operation of large-scale combustors |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/754,072 Continuation-In-Part US7162960B2 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2004-01-08 | Process for reducing plume opacity |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20070044693A1 true US20070044693A1 (en) | 2007-03-01 |
Family
ID=34739305
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/754,072 Expired - Lifetime US7162960B2 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2004-01-08 | Process for reducing plume opacity |
| US11/427,894 Abandoned US20070044693A1 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2006-06-30 | Process for improving operation of large-scale combustors |
Family Applications Before (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/754,072 Expired - Lifetime US7162960B2 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2004-01-08 | Process for reducing plume opacity |
Country Status (9)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US7162960B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1711740A4 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR101123567B1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN1930419B (en) |
| AU (2) | AU2005206737A1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2552979C (en) |
| MX (1) | MXPA06007879A (en) |
| RU (1) | RU2375634C2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2005070076A2 (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20090178599A1 (en) * | 2008-01-15 | 2009-07-16 | Environmental Energy Services, Inc. | Process for operating a coal-fired furnace with reduced slag formation |
| WO2010006325A1 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2010-01-14 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium |
| US20110017110A1 (en) * | 2009-07-24 | 2011-01-27 | Higgins Brian S | Methods and systems for improving combustion processes |
| US20120312206A1 (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2012-12-13 | Dorner Robert W | Method for reducing slag in biomass combustion |
| US9127228B2 (en) | 2011-01-14 | 2015-09-08 | Enviornmental Energy Serivces, Inc. | Process for operating a furnace with a bituminous coal and method for reducing slag formation therewith |
| US11116737B1 (en) | 2020-04-10 | 2021-09-14 | University Of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. | Methods of using probenecid for treatment of coronavirus infections |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7162960B2 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2007-01-16 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Process for reducing plume opacity |
| WO2007097795A2 (en) * | 2005-11-28 | 2007-08-30 | Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | Flame-retardant magnesium hydroxide compositions and associated methods of manufacture and use |
| FR2897674B1 (en) * | 2006-02-20 | 2015-03-20 | Univ D Aix Marseille I | PROCESS FOR REMOVING ORGANIC MATERIALS AND GENERATING ENERGY |
| US7775166B2 (en) * | 2007-03-16 | 2010-08-17 | Afton Chemical Corporation | Method of using nanoalloy additives to reduce plume opacity, slagging, fouling, corrosion and emissions |
| WO2011106429A1 (en) * | 2010-02-23 | 2011-09-01 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Methods, apparatus and systems for improving the operation of cyclone boilers |
| RU2650936C1 (en) * | 2016-07-19 | 2018-04-18 | Олегс Циркуновс | Method for reducing the reduction of harmful combustion products into the environment by the combustion of the dried sludge |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5740745A (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 1998-04-21 | Nalco Fuel Tech | Process for increasing the effectiveness of slag control chemicals for black liquor recovery and other combustion units |
| US6206685B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2001-03-27 | Ge Energy And Environmental Research Corporation | Method for reducing NOx in combustion flue gas using metal-containing additives |
| US6615751B1 (en) * | 1999-07-16 | 2003-09-09 | Raetech | Method for reducing agglomeration, sintering and deposit formation in gasification and combustion of biomass |
| US7162960B2 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2007-01-16 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Process for reducing plume opacity |
Family Cites Families (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4377118A (en) * | 1981-12-21 | 1983-03-22 | Nalco Chemical Company | Process for reducing slag build-up |
| DE3413831A1 (en) * | 1984-04-10 | 1985-10-17 | L. & C. Steinmüller GmbH, 5270 Gummersbach | METHOD FOR REDUCING POLLUTANT EMISSION IN COMBUSTION PLANTS |
| US4616574A (en) * | 1984-05-25 | 1986-10-14 | Empire State Electric Energy Research Corp. (Eseerco) | Process for treating combustion systems with pressure-hydrated dolomitic lime |
| RU2085806C1 (en) * | 1991-06-06 | 1997-07-27 | Шоппе Фритц | Method and device for better use heat from combustion products |
| RU2037099C1 (en) * | 1993-11-25 | 1995-06-09 | Максим Витальевич Бочков | Method of fuel burning |
| CN1064394C (en) * | 1997-01-23 | 2001-04-11 | 华中理工大学 | Method for making coal combustion catalyst promoting agent |
-
2004
- 2004-01-08 US US10/754,072 patent/US7162960B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2005
- 2005-01-07 RU RU2006127344/06A patent/RU2375634C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-01-07 EP EP05705226A patent/EP1711740A4/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-01-07 CA CA2552979A patent/CA2552979C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-01-07 WO PCT/US2005/000462 patent/WO2005070076A2/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-01-07 CN CN2005800075859A patent/CN1930419B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-01-07 AU AU2005206737A patent/AU2005206737A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-01-07 KR KR1020067015930A patent/KR101123567B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-01-07 MX MXPA06007879A patent/MXPA06007879A/en active IP Right Grant
-
2006
- 2006-06-30 US US11/427,894 patent/US20070044693A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2009
- 2009-06-26 AU AU2009202595A patent/AU2009202595B2/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5740745A (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 1998-04-21 | Nalco Fuel Tech | Process for increasing the effectiveness of slag control chemicals for black liquor recovery and other combustion units |
| US5894806A (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 1999-04-20 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Process for increasing the effectiveness of slag and/or corrosion control chemicals for combustion units |
| US6615751B1 (en) * | 1999-07-16 | 2003-09-09 | Raetech | Method for reducing agglomeration, sintering and deposit formation in gasification and combustion of biomass |
| US6206685B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2001-03-27 | Ge Energy And Environmental Research Corporation | Method for reducing NOx in combustion flue gas using metal-containing additives |
| US7162960B2 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2007-01-16 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Process for reducing plume opacity |
Cited By (18)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20090178599A1 (en) * | 2008-01-15 | 2009-07-16 | Environmental Energy Services, Inc. | Process for operating a coal-fired furnace with reduced slag formation |
| WO2009091539A1 (en) * | 2008-01-15 | 2009-07-23 | Environmental Energy Services, Inc. | Process for operating a coal-fired furnace with reduced slag formation |
| US9863632B2 (en) | 2008-01-15 | 2018-01-09 | Environmental Energy Services, Inc. | Process for operating a coal-fired furnace with reduced slag formation |
| US9182121B2 (en) * | 2008-01-15 | 2015-11-10 | Environmental Energy Services, Inc. | Process for operating a coal-fired furnace with reduced slag formation |
| US20140318428A1 (en) * | 2008-01-15 | 2014-10-30 | Environmental Energy Services, Inc. | Process for operating a coal-fired furnace with reduced slag formation |
| AU2009268391B2 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2014-05-08 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium |
| KR101298932B1 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2013-08-22 | 퓨얼 테크 인코포레이티드 | Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium |
| CN102089413A (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2011-06-08 | 燃料技术公司 | Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium |
| AU2009268391C1 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2014-12-11 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium |
| US20100006014A1 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2010-01-14 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium |
| WO2010006325A1 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2010-01-14 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium |
| US20110017110A1 (en) * | 2009-07-24 | 2011-01-27 | Higgins Brian S | Methods and systems for improving combustion processes |
| US9127228B2 (en) | 2011-01-14 | 2015-09-08 | Enviornmental Energy Serivces, Inc. | Process for operating a furnace with a bituminous coal and method for reducing slag formation therewith |
| US9541288B2 (en) | 2011-01-14 | 2017-01-10 | Environmental Energy Services, Inc. | Process for operating a furnace with bituminous coal and method for reducing slag formation therewith |
| US20120312206A1 (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2012-12-13 | Dorner Robert W | Method for reducing slag in biomass combustion |
| US9920929B2 (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2018-03-20 | Ecolab Usa Inc. | Method for reducing slag in biomass combustion |
| US11116737B1 (en) | 2020-04-10 | 2021-09-14 | University Of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. | Methods of using probenecid for treatment of coronavirus infections |
| US11903916B2 (en) | 2020-04-10 | 2024-02-20 | University Of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. | Methods of using probenecid for treatment of coronavirus infections |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2552979C (en) | 2011-03-15 |
| KR20060131838A (en) | 2006-12-20 |
| RU2006127344A (en) | 2008-02-20 |
| MXPA06007879A (en) | 2007-02-16 |
| AU2005206737A1 (en) | 2005-08-04 |
| US7162960B2 (en) | 2007-01-16 |
| EP1711740A4 (en) | 2012-11-28 |
| RU2375634C2 (en) | 2009-12-10 |
| CN1930419B (en) | 2012-06-27 |
| CA2552979A1 (en) | 2005-08-04 |
| AU2009202595B2 (en) | 2011-06-23 |
| EP1711740A2 (en) | 2006-10-18 |
| AU2009202595A1 (en) | 2009-07-16 |
| KR101123567B1 (en) | 2012-03-12 |
| US20050150441A1 (en) | 2005-07-14 |
| WO2005070076A3 (en) | 2006-02-16 |
| WO2005070076A2 (en) | 2005-08-04 |
| CN1930419A (en) | 2007-03-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| AU2009202595B2 (en) | Process for reducing plume opacity | |
| Javed et al. | Control of combustion-generated nitrogen oxides by selective non-catalytic reduction | |
| US7332143B2 (en) | Targeted duct injection for SO3 control | |
| US4616574A (en) | Process for treating combustion systems with pressure-hydrated dolomitic lime | |
| RU2366690C1 (en) | Method for using of fuel additives being nanosized alloys for non-transparency flame decreasing, scorification, contamination, corrosion and release into atmosphere | |
| KR101572562B1 (en) | process of manufacturing | |
| Gaba et al. | Reduction of air pollution by combustion processes | |
| Tugov et al. | All-Russia Thermal Engineering Institute experience in using difficult to burn fuels in the power industry | |
| US10718511B2 (en) | System for combustion of fuel to provide high efficiency, low pollution energy | |
| JP2002273159A (en) | Method for neutralizing combustion exhaust gas of fossil fuel containing sulfur | |
| US20110203498A1 (en) | Methods, Apparatus and Systems for Improving the Operation of Cyclone Boilers | |
| US3488129A (en) | Method of bursting liquid fuel with calcium carbonate | |
| Chowdhury | Emission control alternatives for electric utility power plants | |
| RU2634730C2 (en) | Additive for fuel oil | |
| RU2655437C1 (en) | Method of chemical protection of boiler equipment | |
| Lin et al. | Emissions of oil‐fired furnaces burning with sodium chloride‐contained air | |
| Lin et al. | Emissions from an oil‐fired furnace burning MgO containing fuel oils | |
| Sharma et al. | Review of emissions control and NOx reduction techniques in coal fired thermal steam generators | |
| WO2003066198A1 (en) | Additive for exhaust gas, method of manufacturing the additive, and method for power generation using the additive | |
| Tyurina et al. | Feasibility studies of the influence of fuels of different composition, including coal-enrichment waste, on the reliability of the boiler operation | |
| Radway | How more ash makes less | |
| Patel | Application Of Fuel Additives To Enhance Boiler Performance | |
| Lee et al. | WHITE PLUME REMOVAL USING FUEL ADDITIVES IN THERMAL POWER PLANTS | |
| Farzan et al. | NOx Control for Utility Boiler OTR Compliance | |
| Kutty et al. | EVALUATION OF CHEMICAL FUEL ADDITIVES TO CONTROL CORROSION AND EMISSIONS IN DUAL PURPOSE DESAL/POWER PLANTS1 |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FUEL TECH, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SMYRNIOTIS, CHRISTOPHER R.;RIVERA, EMILTO P.;ZUCCARINI, FRANK;REEL/FRAME:018520/0170 Effective date: 20061009 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FUEL TECH, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: RE-RECORD TO ADD THE NAME OF THE FOURTH ASSIGNOR, PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 018520 FRAME 0170.;ASSIGNORS:SMYRNIOTIS, CHRISTOPHER R.;RIVERA, EMILITO P.;ZUCCARINI, FRANK;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:018587/0237 Effective date: 20061009 |
|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |