AU2009268391B2 - Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium - Google Patents
Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU2009268391B2 AU2009268391B2 AU2009268391A AU2009268391A AU2009268391B2 AU 2009268391 B2 AU2009268391 B2 AU 2009268391B2 AU 2009268391 A AU2009268391 A AU 2009268391A AU 2009268391 A AU2009268391 A AU 2009268391A AU 2009268391 B2 AU2009268391 B2 AU 2009268391B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- slag
- coal
- pounds
- reagent
- combustor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23C—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR COMBUSTION USING FLUID FUEL OR SOLID FUEL SUSPENDED IN A CARRIER GAS OR AIR
- F23C99/00—Subject-matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
- C10L10/00—Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes
- C10L10/06—Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes for facilitating soot removal
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
- C10L10/00—Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes
- C10L10/04—Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes for minimising corrosion or incrustation
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23J—REMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES
- F23J3/00—Removing solid residues from passages or chambers beyond the fire, e.g. from flues by soot blowers
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23J—REMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES
- F23J7/00—Arrangement of devices for supplying chemicals to fire
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
- C10L2200/00—Components of fuel compositions
- C10L2200/02—Inorganic or organic compounds containing atoms other than C, H or O, e.g. organic compounds containing heteroatoms or metal organic complexes
- C10L2200/0204—Metals or alloys
- C10L2200/0213—Group II metals: Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Ra, Zn, Cd, Hg
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
- C10L2200/00—Components of fuel compositions
- C10L2200/02—Inorganic or organic compounds containing atoms other than C, H or O, e.g. organic compounds containing heteroatoms or metal organic complexes
- C10L2200/0204—Metals or alloys
- C10L2200/0218—Group III metals: Sc, Y, Al, Ga, In, Tl
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
- C10L2200/00—Components of fuel compositions
- C10L2200/02—Inorganic or organic compounds containing atoms other than C, H or O, e.g. organic compounds containing heteroatoms or metal organic complexes
- C10L2200/0254—Oxygen containing compounds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
- C10L2290/00—Fuel preparation or upgrading, processes or apparatus therefore, comprising specific process steps or apparatus units
- C10L2290/14—Injection, e.g. in a reactor or a fuel stream during fuel production
- C10L2290/141—Injection, e.g. in a reactor or a fuel stream during fuel production of additive or catalyst
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIGHTERS
- C10L2290/00—Fuel preparation or upgrading, processes or apparatus therefore, comprising specific process steps or apparatus units
- C10L2290/18—Spraying or sprinkling
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Incineration Of Waste (AREA)
- Solid Fuels And Fuel-Associated Substances (AREA)
- Air Supply (AREA)
- Gasification And Melting Of Waste (AREA)
Abstract
Disclosed is a process that increases the output of a combustor fired with coal having high iron and/or calcium content, by reducing the tendency of slag to form on heat exchange surfaces and changing the nature of the slag to make it easier to remove. The process includes combusting a slag-forming coal, having high iron and/or calcium content, with an overall excess of oxygen; moving the resulting combustion gases though heat exchange equipment under conditions which cause cooling of slag formed by burning the fuel; and prior to contact with said heat exchange equipment, introducing aqueous aluminum trihydroxide in amounts and with droplet sizes and concentrations effective to decrease the rate of fouling, and preferably, increase the friability of the resulting slag. Desirably, the aluminum trihydroxide reagent is introduced in the form of an aqueous liquid and computational fluid dynamics is employed to determine flow rates and select reagent introduction rates, reagent introduction location(s), reagent concentration, reagent droplet size and/or reagent momentum. In a preferred aspect, the feed rate will up to about 6 pounds ATH per ton and preferably with up to about 2 pounds Mg(OH)2 per ton of coal. A process is also provided for cleaning and maintaining cleanliness of a combustor.
Description
"TARGETED REAGENT INJECTION FOR SLAG CONTROL FROM COMBUSTION OF COALS HIGH IN IRON AND/OR CALCIUM Priority Claim 5 This application claims priority to U. S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/080,004, filed July 11, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety. Background 10 [0001] Embodiments relate generally to a process that increases the output of a combustor fired with coal having high iron and/or calcium content, by reducing the tendency of slag to form on heat exchange surfaces, changing the nature of the slag to make it easier to remove and actually removing slag. 15 [0002] Combustion of coal, like other fossil fuels, is invariably less efficient than desired and can be a source of pollution. Maintaining combustor operation at high efficiency and controlling the quality of the emissions is essential for maintaining the energy needed to power our economy while preserving the quality of the air we require 20 for survival. Because efficiency and emissions are interrelated and some technological solutions have been shown to be competitive with each other, it has been difficult to achieve both. Economic operation of power plants and incinerators is in the public interest, and new technologies are essential to this effort. 25 [0003] Fuel selection plays an important role in mitigating some pollution problems, but it cannot eliminate them. Some coals, such as certain Appalachian and Illinois Basin bituminous coals, are important in many plants designed for coal where economics limits other options. The tendency to form slag and the properties of the slag for such high iron content coals have been a major concern of combustion engineers 30 and plant operators for decades. There are a number of factors that impact the physical and chemical properties of slag. See, for example, Combustion Fossil Power, 1991, Joseph G. Singer, P.E., editor, Chapter 3, Combustion Engineering. However, as the industry stands today, there is a compromise between selection 2 of low-cost coal and the actual economics of energy production where slagging becomes a problem. Slag accumulation is a problem that causes decreased heat transfer and often leads to long periods of downtime for cleaning. 5 [0004] An interrelated problem with coal is that large amounts of ash and fine particulates are formed that must be captured and disposed of. The art has used additives to control slag formation and properties, but the additives can stress the solids recovery systems employed in terms of sheer volume. Accordingly, optimum slag control has often been compromised because the solids recovery system could not 10 effectively remove all of the solids necessary. This is especially a problem with older plants where increasing the solids collection capacity is not an option. [0005] Making the problem more complex is the fact that coals react differently to additives as a function of their composition. As a general rule, there are no known formulae that make it possible to address all different coal compositions with suitable 15 additives at effective levels that can be adequately handled by solids recovery equipment. The discovery of individual coal composition and additive regimens are highly sought after to assure that economical power can be supplied while generating sufficient revenues for effective pollution control. 20 [0006] There is a need for an improved process that more effectively controls slagging, especially with problem fuels, such as coals with sulfur contents that cause them to play an increased role in slagging and also those having high iron and/or calcium contents, to improve boiler efficiency and economics. 25 [0006a] Any discussion of documents, acts, materials, devices, articles or the like which has been included in the present specification is not to be taken as an admission that any or all of these matters form part of the prior art base or were common general knowledge in the field relevant to the present disclosure as it existed before the priority date of each claim of this application. 30 Summary [0007] Embodiments generally relate to an improved technology for slag control in combustors utilizing fuels tending toward the production of slag. 35 [0008] Embodiments also relate to a process to control slag from'the combustion of coal with high iron and/or calcium contents while reducing chemical utilization.
3 [0009] It is another .object to provide a process to remove slag from boiler heat exchange surfaces due to the combustion of coal with high iron and/or calcium contents while reducing chemical utilization. 5 [0010] Some embodiments may provide a process to more effectively control slag by decreasing the amount of downtime associated with slag removal. [0011] Some embodiments relate to a process for reducing slag cohesiveness and/or adhesiveness in a combustor, thereby decreasing the rate of fouling, comprising: 10 combusting a slag-forming coal, having an iron content of greater than about 15% based on the weight of the ash and expressed as Fe 2 0 3 and/or a calcium content of greater than 5% based on the weight of the ash and expressed as CaO, with an overall excess of oxygen; moving the resulting combustion gases though heat exchange equipment under 15 conditions which cause cooling of slag formed by burning the fuel; and prior to contact with said heat exchange equipment in the combustor, introducing into hot combustion gases in the combustor an aqueous liquid aluminum trihydroxide reagent in amounts and with droplet sizes and concentrations effective to form nano-sized particles of under 200 nanometers in the hot combustion gases and to 20 decrease the rate of fouling by slag and to increase the friability of resulting slag. [0012] Some embodiments relate to a process according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the process comprises introducing up to about 6 pounds of aluminum trihydroxide slurry per ton of coal and up to about 2 pounds of Mg(OH) 2 per ton of 25 coal. [001 2a] Some embodiments relate to a process according to claim 5 or claim 6, wherein the process comprises introducing up to about 6 pounds of aluminum trihydroxide slurry per ton of coal and up to about 2 pounds of Mg(OH) 2 per ton of coal. 30 [0013] Some embodiments relate to a process for reducing slag cohesiveness and/or adhesiveness in a combustor, thereby decreasing the rate of fouling, comprising: combusting a slag-forming coal, having high iron and/or calcium content, with an overall excess of oxygen; moving the resulting combustion gases though heat exchange equipment under conditions which cause cooling of slag formed by burning the coal; 35 and prior to contact with said heat exchange equipment, introducing aqueous aluminum 4 trihydroxide in amounts and with droplet sizes and concentrations effective to decrease the rate of fouling, and preferably, increase the friability of the resulting slag. [0014] In one preferred aspect, the aluminum trihydroxide reagent is introduced in the 5 form of an aqueous liquid and computational fluid dynamics is employed to determine flow rates and select reagent introduction rates, reagent introduction location(s), reagent concentration, reagent droplet size and/or reagent momentum. [0015] In another preferred aspect, magnesium hydroxide is introduced as an aqueous slurry along with the slurry of aluminum trihydroxide. 10 [0016] Some embodiments relate to a process for cleaning furnace surfaces having a slag buildup, by introducing aqueous aluminum trihydroxide in amounts and with droplet sizes and concentrations effective to contact for fine particulates resulting from drying the slurry to contact existing slag deposits. 15 [0017] In another aspect, embodiments relate to for a process for cleaning and maintenance of a combustor comprising a regimen of initial dosing of from about 3 to 6 pounds of ATH per ton of coal and about I to 2 pounds of Mg(OH)-, per ton of coal for a time sufficient to reduce slag, followed by a reduced reducing the dosing of from 20 about 10 to about 50% of the initial values for maintaining the combustor clean and operating efficiently. [0018] Other preferred aspects and their advantages are set out in the description which follows. 25 Brief Description of the Drawings [0019] Embodiments will be better understood and their advantages will become more apparent when the following detailed description is read in conjunction with the 30 accompanying drawings, in which: [0020] Fig. 1 is a schematic view of some embodiments. [0021] Fig. 2 is a photograph of a slag sample obtained after operation for 24 hours of 35 aluminum trihydroxide into a combustor operated on a high iron content coal as set out in Example 2 below.
5 Detailed Description [0022] Reference will first be made to Fig. 1, which is a schematic view of some 5 embodiments. Fig. 1 shows a large combustor 10 of the type used for producing steam for electrical power generation, process steam, heating or incineration. Coal is fed by burners 20 and 20a and burned with air in a combustion zone 21. Described embodiments can process coal that is high in iron (e.g., iron contents of greater than about 15%, e.g., from about 20 to 35%, based on the weight of the ash and expressed as 10 Fe203) and/or calcium content (e.g., calcium contents of greater than 5%, e.g., from about 10 to 25%, based on the weight of the ash and expressed as CaO). Advantageously, slag can be effectively controlled even for coals having significant sulfur contents, e.g., above about 1% and in the range of from about 3 to about 5%. Here, and throughout this description, all parts 15 and percentages are by weight. [0023] Air for combustion, supplied by fan 22 and ductwork 24, is preferably preheated by a gas-to-gas heat exchangers (not shown) which transfer heat from ductwork (not shown) at the exit end of the combustor. Hot combustion gases rise and flow past heat 20 exchangers 26, which transfer heat from the combustion gases to water for the generation of steam. Other heat exchangers, including an economizer (downstream and not shown) may also be provided according to the design of the particular boiler. Slag left untreated would tend to form on these heat exchanger surfaces, which are positioned within specific combustors based on design considerations important to 25 individual locations. It is an advantage of the present invention that modeling techniques, such as computational fluid dynamics, can be employed to initially direct treatment chemicals (especially, those identified as effective for particular types of coal according to the invention) to the optimum locations for reducing and/or controlling slag buildup and maintaining efficient operation of the boiler. 30 [0024] A series of suitable, preferably air assisted atomizing, nozzles in each of nozzle banks 30 and 30a are provided for introducing aluminum trihydroxide alone or with magnesium hydroxide slurry from vessels 40 and 40a respectively. Both the ATH and the magnesium hydroxide are preferably aqueous, as slurries and/or solutions as 35 appropriate. Supply lines (e.g., 41) are shown as double lines in the drawing. Valves (e.g., 42) are represented by the common symbol (>1) and temperature sensors (e.g., 6 44) are represented by the common symbol(D)Both valves 42 and temperature sensors 44 are connected to controller 46 via electrical leads (e.g., 48) shown in dotted lines. These valves, temperature sensors and leads are illustrative only, and the skilled worker using the principles outlined herein will place them strategically to provide appropriate 5 control signals and responses. The controller 46 can be a general purpose digital computer programmed in accord with a predetermined control regimen with both feed forward and feedback features. [0025] Aluminum trihydroxide (Al(OH) 3 ), which has been found effective according to 10 described embodiments for greatly lessening. the deposition of slag or cleaning deposited slag from troublesome coal types, is also known under other names such as ATH, aluminum hydroxide and hydrated alumina. Regardless of the form of aluminum trihydroxide raw material, it is preferred that it is mixed with water for introduction from tank 40 through associated lines 41, with or without chemical stabilizers, to 15 concentrations suitable for storage and handling, e.g., at least about 25%, and preferably at least about 65%, solids by weight. [0026] As will be described, the concentration and flow rates will be initially determined by modeling to assure that the proper amount of chemical is supplied to the 20 correct location in the combustor in the correct physical form to achieve the desired results of reduced slagging and ease of clean up. For use in the process, it is diluted as determined, e.g., by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to within the range of from about 0.1 to about 10 %, more narrowly from about I to about 5 %. When the aqueous aluminum trihydroxide contacts the hot gases in the combustor, it is believed to be 25 reduced to very small particles, e.g., nano-sized particles, e.g., under 200 nanometers and preferably below about 100 nanometers. Median particle sizes of from 50 to about 150 nanometers are useful ranges for described processes of the invention. To approach this size, it is important that the ATH be introduced with water. The -small particles are believed to disrupt the normal crystalline or glass that forms the slag. 30 Regardless of the mechanism involved it is a distinct advantage that the slag that does form is highly friable and breaks easily with brushing and can be crushed by hand. [0027] It is a significant advantage of described embodiments that the friability of slag that is formed is increased, making it easier to remove. Described embodiments can 35 also slow or eliminate the buildup of slag. Advantageously, at high doses, described processed can actually remove slag that has already formed. By the term "increase the 7 friability of the slag" it is meant that the slag after treatment requires less force per unit area to crush than slag formed under the same conditions without the treatment. By the term "remove slag" it is meant that the weight of the slag adhering to boiler, particularly heat exchange, surfaces is reduced from initial values by the described 5 treatments. There are several additional and attendant advantages , including the reduction of S03 for high sulfur coals, the reduction of the pressure drop across heat exchange apparatus, the ability to use lower cost coal, lower CO generation, lower CO, generation due to increased fuel consumption, better heat transfer, less down time, higher throughput, cleaning on line, cleaner heat exchange surfaces, ability to clean the 10 whole combustor, and the ability to run at all loads with greater efficiency. [0028] The process for most coals works best with a combination of ATH and magnesium hydroxide. While some coals, e.g., with low silicate compositions can be burned with reduced problems attributed to slag, the use of magnesium hydroxide, at least initially, is preferred. The magnesium hydroxide reagent can preferably be 15 prepared from brines containing calcium and other salts, usually from underground brine pools or seawater. Dolomitic lime is mixed with these brines to form calcium chloride solution and magnesium hydroxide which is precipitated and filtered out of the solution. This form of magnesium hydroxide can be mixed with water, with or without stabilizers, to concentrations suitable for storage and handling, e.g., from 25 to 65% 20 solids by weight. For use in the process, it is diluted as determined by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to within the range of from 0.1 to 10%, more narrowly from 1 to 5%. When it contacts the effluent in combustor, it is believed reduced to nano-sized particles, e.g., under 200 nanometers and preferably below about 100 nanometers. Median particle sizes of from SO to about 150 nanometers are useful ranges for the 25 process of the invention. Other forms of MgO can also be employed where necessary or desired, e.g., "light burn" or "caustic" can be employed where it is available in the desired particle size range. [0029] To best achieve these effects, embodiments will preferably take advantage of 30 CFD to project initial flow rates and select initial reagent introduction rates, reagent introduction location(s), reagent concentration, reagent droplet size and reagent momentum. CFD is a well understood science, and it is utilized with full benefit in this case, where it is desired to supply a minimum amount of chemical for maximum effect. 35 [0030] It is noted as highly significant that the amount of chemical will be substoichiometric in terms of affecting the fusion point of the slag - often considered 8 to be the controlling factor in slag control. There is good evidence besides the relatively small amount of reagent employed that the results of described embodiments are due to a physical disruption of slag formation with possible boundary chemical and kinetic effects not explained by the literature. 5 [0031] Testing has shown that initial feed rates determined by CFD can be utilized with good effect and then adjusted based on observed results. As a guide to feed rates, the initial feed rate for the best economics for combustors operating similar to the one exemplified below can be up to about 6 pounds of ATH(as dry active ATH) or 8 10 pounds (as a 65-70% slurry) per ton of coal. For example, when added as a preferred 70% slurry, amounts of from about I to about 6 pounds of slurry will be effective (more narrowly, e.g., about 2 to about 3 pounds of slurry). It is preferred to also use up to about 2 pounds of Mg(OH)2 slurry (at about 50 - 60% solids) per ton of coal. For example, when added as a preferred 60% slurry, amounts of from about 0.5 to about 2 15 pounds of Mg(OH) 2 slurry per ton of coal, e.g., from about 0.7 to about 1 pounds of Mg(OH)2 slurry per ton of coal can be utilized. The slurries are diluted as necessary, typically to a solids concentration of from about 5% for smaller applications to about 35% or more. 20 [0032] The weight of the slag adhering to a combustor, particularly heat exchange, surfaces is effectively reduced from initial values by the described treatment especially when the ATH and Mg(OH)., are used at high concentrations within the above ranges, e.g., from about 3 to 6 pounds of ATH per ton of coal and about 1 to 2 pounds of Mg(OH)7 per ton of coal. This ability to remove slag provides the ability to 25 provide a cleaning and maintenance regimen wherein the initial dosing is as just mentioned for removing slag, with the dosing then reduced to from about 10 to about 50% of the initial values for maintaining the combustor clean and operating efficiently. [0033] For optimum slag remediation , the correct initial concentrations, rates and 30 introduction rates should be calculated and employed for the effective physical form of aluminum trihydroxide, and preferably, optionally magnesium hydroxide, to be introduced into the hot combustion gases in chamber 20 to enable the chemical to be added with the desired effect. The implementation of CFD with described embodiments can be accomplished as set out in U. S. Patent No. 7,162,960 to Smyrniotis, et al. 35 Particulate removal equipment (not shown) can be employed to remove particulates prior to passing the effluent up the stack.
9 [0034] In another alternate form , combustion catalysts and or effluent treatment chemicals can be added to the fuel, combustion zone or otherwise as described, for example in U. S. Patent No. 7,162,960 to Smyrniotis, et al. 5 [0035] The following examples are presented to further explain and illustrate embodiments and are not to be taken as limiting in any regard. Unless otherwise indicated, all parts and percentages are by weight. 10 Example 1 [0036] This example illustrates introduction of aluminum trihydroxide into a furnace bun 540 tons of coal per day. The coal is a blend of Illinois basin and Appalachian bitumir coals, ivin the following analysis as combined: Sample 1 3 Moisture, % 11.28 10.85 10.19 Ash, % 14.91 13.63 13.91 olatile Matter, % 6.03 35.04 Fixed Carbon, % 39.49 0.86 Total, % 100 100 Sulfur, % 3.95 4.44 HV, BTU/lb 10,742 10,730 15 [0037] For the test AI(OH)3 (aluminum trihydroxide slurry or ATH for short) is fed as 70% by weight aqueous slurry at a rate of 5 pounds slurry per ton of coal consumed frog two banks of three air-cooled nozzles positioned on the wall opposite of two banks of pulverized coal burners - one bank at an elevation between the two burners and one 20 bai at an elevation above the uppermost coal burners. The slurry is diluted to a concentratic of 35 weight % ATH. The density of the ATH slurry before dilution is about 14 pounds/gallon, meaning that the feed rate is about 193 gallons per day (about 5 pounds ton of coal) for ATH slurry.
10 [0038] Based on this test, it is estimated that an effective feed rate for this particular combustor will be from about I to about 6 pounds of ATH slurry per ton of coal, e.g., about 2 to about 3 pounds per ton. 5 Example 2 [0039] This example illustrates the effect of introducing Mg(OH), (magnesium hydroxide) into a furnace burning 540 tons of coal per day in addition to the aluminum trihydroxide fed in Example 1.-The coal was a blend of Illinois basin and Appalachian 10 bituminous coals, as illustrated in Example 1. [0040] The magnesium hydroxide was fed as a slurry at 2 lbs of 50 to 60 weight % slurry per ton of coal consumed. Density of the magnesium hydroxide slurry was approximately 12 lbs/gallon. Therefore, the feed rate was about 90 gallons per day for the Mg(OH)-, slurry. As before, we fed the aluminum trihydroxide slurry at about 5 15 pounds of slurry per ton of coal consumed. The density of the ATH was about 14 pounds/gallon, making the feed rate about 193 gallons per day for ATH. [0041] Based on this test, we estimate optimal feed rate for the best economics for the this particular combustor to be about 0.5 to about 2 pounds Mg(OH), slurry per ton of coal (e.g., about 1 pound per ton) plus from about 1 to about 6 pounds ATH slurry per 20 ton (e.g., about 2 to about 3 pounds per ton). Fig. 2 is a photograph of a slag sample obtained after operation for 24 hours of ATH feed only. The slag was unexpectedly friable. [0042] The above description is for the purpose of teaching the person of ordinary skill in the art how to practice the invention. It is not intended to detail all of those obvious 25 modifications and variations, which will become apparent to the skilled worker upon reading the description. It is intended, however, that all such obvious modifications and variations be included within the scope of the invention which is defined by the following claims. The claims are meant to cover the claimed components and steps in any sequence that is effective to meet the objectives there intended, unless the context 30 specifically indicates the contrary.
Claims (5)
1. A process for reducing slag cohesiveness and/or adhesiveness in a combustor, thereby decreasing the rate of fouling, comprising: 5 combusting a slag-forming coal, having an iron content of greater than about 15% based on the weight of the ash and expressed as Fe 2 0 3 and/or a calcium content of greater than 5% based on the weight of the ash and expressed as CaO, with an overall excess of oxygen; moving the resulting combustion gases though heat exchange equipment under 10 conditions which cause cooling of slag formed by burning the fuel; and prior to contact with said heat exchange equipment in the combustor, introducing into hot combustion gases in the combustor an aqueous liquid aluminum trihydroxide reagent in amounts and with droplet sizes and concentrations effective to form nano-sized particles of under 200 nanometers in the hot combustion gases and to 15 decrease the rate of fouling by slag and to increase the friability of resulting slag.
2. A process according to claim 1, including the further steps of determining by computational fluid dynamics values for initial reagent introduction rates, introduction location(s), concentration, droplet size and momentum. 20
3. A process according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the process further includes introducing magnesium hydroxide in amounts and with droplet sizes and concentrations effective to form nano-sized particles of under 200 nanometers and to decrease the rate of fouling by slag. 25
4. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the process comprises introducing up to about 6 pounds of aluminum trihydroxide slurry per ton of coal and up to about 2 pounds of Mg(OH) 2 per ton of coal. 30 5. A process for cleaning and maintenance of a boiler burning coal having an iron content of greater than about 15% based on the weight of the ash and expressed as Fe 2 0 3 and/or a calcium content of greater than 5% based on the weight of the ash and expressed as CaO, comprising a regimen of initial dosing of from about 3 to 6 pounds of aqueous aluminum trihydroxide per ton of coal and about 1 to 2 pounds of aqueous 35 magnesium hydroxide per ton of coal for a time sufficient to reduce slag, followed by reducing the dosing of from about 10 to about 50% of the initial values by weight for 1007354_1 12 maintaining the combustor clean and operating efficiently, wherein the aqueous aluminum trihydroxide and magnesium hydroxide are introduced with droplet sizes and concentrations effective to form nano-sized particles of under 200 nanometers and to decrease the rate of fouling by slag.
5 1007354_1
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US8000408P | 2008-07-11 | 2008-07-11 | |
| US61/080,004 | 2008-07-11 | ||
| PCT/US2009/050354 WO2010006325A1 (en) | 2008-07-11 | 2009-07-13 | Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium |
Publications (3)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU2009268391A1 AU2009268391A1 (en) | 2010-01-14 |
| AU2009268391B2 true AU2009268391B2 (en) | 2014-05-08 |
| AU2009268391C1 AU2009268391C1 (en) | 2014-12-11 |
Family
ID=41507460
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU2009268391A Ceased AU2009268391C1 (en) | 2008-07-11 | 2009-07-13 | Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium |
Country Status (17)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20100006014A1 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP2318489B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP5657533B2 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR101298932B1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN102089413B (en) |
| AR (1) | AR072502A1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2009268391C1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2729959C (en) |
| CL (1) | CL2009001571A1 (en) |
| CO (1) | CO6300873A2 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2554165T3 (en) |
| MX (1) | MX2011000275A (en) |
| MY (1) | MY156010A (en) |
| PL (1) | PL2318489T3 (en) |
| RU (1) | RU2493240C2 (en) |
| TW (1) | TWI482852B (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2010006325A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20090178599A1 (en) | 2008-01-15 | 2009-07-16 | Environmental Energy Services, Inc. | Process for operating a coal-fired furnace with reduced slag formation |
| ES2777175T3 (en) | 2011-01-14 | 2020-08-04 | Env Energy Services Inc | Procedure of operation of a furnace with a bituminous coal and procedure to reduce the formation of slag using the same |
| US9920929B2 (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2018-03-20 | Ecolab Usa Inc. | Method for reducing slag in biomass combustion |
| WO2017053499A1 (en) * | 2015-09-25 | 2017-03-30 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Process and apparatus for reducing plume |
| US12078348B2 (en) * | 2021-11-24 | 2024-09-03 | Chemtreat, Inc. | Systems and methods for online control of volatized chemical treatment solutions in boiler systems |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4498402A (en) * | 1983-06-13 | 1985-02-12 | Kober Alfred E | Method of reducing high temperature slagging in furnaces and conditioner for use therein |
| JP2004083796A (en) * | 2002-08-28 | 2004-03-18 | Taiho Ind Co Ltd | Fuel additive for preventing slugging and method of burning fuel |
| US20050150441A1 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2005-07-14 | Smyrniotis Christopher R. | Process for reducing plume opacity |
| US20060121398A1 (en) * | 2004-12-07 | 2006-06-08 | Meffert Michael W | Additive atomizing systems and apparatus |
Family Cites Families (17)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3153091B2 (en) * | 1994-03-10 | 2001-04-03 | 株式会社荏原製作所 | Waste treatment method and gasification and melting and combustion equipment |
| CA1136078A (en) * | 1978-09-21 | 1982-11-23 | George P. Masologites | Process for removing sulfur from coal |
| US4428310A (en) * | 1982-07-26 | 1984-01-31 | Nalco Chemical Company | Phosphated alumina as slag modifier |
| JPS59189144A (en) * | 1983-04-12 | 1984-10-26 | Hokuriku Electric Power Co Inc:The | Filler for rubber |
| JPH0586374A (en) * | 1991-09-26 | 1993-04-06 | Teikoku Sekiyu Kk | Decomposition of carbohydrate into combustible gas |
| RU2086293C1 (en) * | 1993-05-28 | 1997-08-10 | Олег Порфирьевич Кочетков | Method and device for gas scrubbing |
| US6289827B1 (en) * | 1999-06-24 | 2001-09-18 | Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties Inc. | Process for the control of ash accumulation and corrosivity associated with selective catalytic reduction technology |
| US6729248B2 (en) * | 2000-06-26 | 2004-05-04 | Ada Environmental Solutions, Llc | Low sulfur coal additive for improved furnace operation |
| US6613110B2 (en) * | 2001-01-11 | 2003-09-02 | Benetech, Inc. | Inhibition of reflective ash build-up in coal-fired furnaces |
| JP3745973B2 (en) * | 2001-03-23 | 2006-02-15 | タイホー工業株式会社 | Coal additive for preventing slagging and coal combustion method |
| JP2003090530A (en) * | 2001-07-10 | 2003-03-28 | Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind Co Ltd | Clinker deposition prevention device |
| CA2548500C (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2010-01-12 | Intercat, Inc. | Mixed metal oxide sorbents |
| TWI342335B (en) * | 2004-06-02 | 2011-05-21 | Intercat Inc | Mixed metal oxide additives |
| CA2596893C (en) * | 2005-02-04 | 2013-04-09 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Targeted duct injection for so3 control |
| US20070004693A1 (en) * | 2005-06-16 | 2007-01-04 | Warner Chilcott Company Inc. | Estrogen compositions for vaginal administration |
| US20090071067A1 (en) * | 2007-09-17 | 2009-03-19 | Ian Macpherson | Environmentally-Friendly Additives And Additive Compositions For Solid Fuels |
| US20090178599A1 (en) * | 2008-01-15 | 2009-07-16 | Environmental Energy Services, Inc. | Process for operating a coal-fired furnace with reduced slag formation |
-
2009
- 2009-07-10 TW TW098123559A patent/TWI482852B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-07-10 CL CL2009001571A patent/CL2009001571A1/en unknown
- 2009-07-13 EP EP09795277.4A patent/EP2318489B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2009-07-13 PL PL09795277T patent/PL2318489T3/en unknown
- 2009-07-13 AU AU2009268391A patent/AU2009268391C1/en not_active Ceased
- 2009-07-13 MX MX2011000275A patent/MX2011000275A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2009-07-13 CA CA2729959A patent/CA2729959C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2009-07-13 JP JP2011517673A patent/JP5657533B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2009-07-13 MY MYPI2011000010A patent/MY156010A/en unknown
- 2009-07-13 US US12/501,590 patent/US20100006014A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2009-07-13 ES ES09795277.4T patent/ES2554165T3/en active Active
- 2009-07-13 WO PCT/US2009/050354 patent/WO2010006325A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2009-07-13 AR ARP090102634A patent/AR072502A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2009-07-13 RU RU2011103846/04A patent/RU2493240C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-07-13 CN CN2009801268715A patent/CN102089413B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2009-07-13 KR KR1020117003171A patent/KR101298932B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2011
- 2011-02-04 CO CO11012993A patent/CO6300873A2/en active IP Right Grant
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4498402A (en) * | 1983-06-13 | 1985-02-12 | Kober Alfred E | Method of reducing high temperature slagging in furnaces and conditioner for use therein |
| JP2004083796A (en) * | 2002-08-28 | 2004-03-18 | Taiho Ind Co Ltd | Fuel additive for preventing slugging and method of burning fuel |
| US20050150441A1 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2005-07-14 | Smyrniotis Christopher R. | Process for reducing plume opacity |
| US20070044693A1 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2007-03-01 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Process for improving operation of large-scale combustors |
| US20060121398A1 (en) * | 2004-12-07 | 2006-06-08 | Meffert Michael W | Additive atomizing systems and apparatus |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CO6300873A2 (en) | 2011-07-21 |
| CA2729959C (en) | 2015-09-01 |
| JP2011527000A (en) | 2011-10-20 |
| HK1157810A1 (en) | 2012-07-06 |
| KR101298932B1 (en) | 2013-08-22 |
| CN102089413B (en) | 2013-12-18 |
| TWI482852B (en) | 2015-05-01 |
| RU2493240C2 (en) | 2013-09-20 |
| MX2011000275A (en) | 2011-03-02 |
| CL2009001571A1 (en) | 2010-03-12 |
| EP2318489A4 (en) | 2013-05-15 |
| CN102089413A (en) | 2011-06-08 |
| US20100006014A1 (en) | 2010-01-14 |
| RU2011103846A (en) | 2012-08-20 |
| MY156010A (en) | 2015-12-31 |
| AU2009268391A1 (en) | 2010-01-14 |
| CA2729959A1 (en) | 2010-01-14 |
| KR20110043656A (en) | 2011-04-27 |
| JP5657533B2 (en) | 2015-01-21 |
| ES2554165T3 (en) | 2015-12-16 |
| EP2318489A1 (en) | 2011-05-11 |
| PL2318489T3 (en) | 2016-03-31 |
| EP2318489B1 (en) | 2015-09-02 |
| AR072502A1 (en) | 2010-09-01 |
| AU2009268391C1 (en) | 2014-12-11 |
| TW201009067A (en) | 2010-03-01 |
| WO2010006325A1 (en) | 2010-01-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2244981C (en) | Process for increasing the effectiveness of slag control chemicals for black liquor recovery and other combustion units | |
| EP1848524B1 (en) | Targeted duct injection for so3 control | |
| AU2009268391B2 (en) | Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium | |
| CN110520208A (en) | The method for reducing the corrosion of the heat exchanger of the incinerator including heat exchanger | |
| JP2005008662A (en) | Carbide processing method and apparatus | |
| HK1157810B (en) | Targeted reagent injection for slag control from combustion of coals high in iron and/or calcium | |
| Tugov et al. | All-Russia Thermal Engineering Institute experience in using difficult to burn fuels in the power industry | |
| CN111102564A (en) | Clean power generation method for mixed-burning coal slime based on bed temperature and bed pressure control | |
| US5487762A (en) | Method of minimizing deposits when firing tire derived fuels | |
| CN105570908B (en) | Method and system for recycling and treating waste | |
| CN204730188U (en) | A kind of Integrated Processing Unit of gasification furnace filter cake | |
| CN109690265A (en) | Sediment monitoring for black liquor recovery boilers | |
| Kim et al. | Optimal blending ratio of Elga caking coal in Samcheok circulating fluidized bed boilers: Experimental and practical insights | |
| FI130534B (en) | A method and a system for removing harmful compounds from a power plant | |
| Kaczyński et al. | The influence of temperature and oxidizing atmosphere on the process of combusting pellets from agricultural and forest biomass in the stream of inert material | |
| CN1332000C (en) | Desulfate agent for fuel coal and preparation process thereof | |
| CN111102563A (en) | Clean power generation method by blending and burning coal slime based on low-position coal slime feeding mode | |
| CN111102565A (en) | Method for controlling emission of pollutants generated by mixed combustion of coal slime | |
| CN111102566A (en) | Clean power generation method by blending and burning coal slime in large circulating fluidized bed boiler | |
| CN115727319B (en) | Treatment method of three-mud in oil refinery | |
| WO2018182406A1 (en) | A method of reducing corrosion of a heat exchanger of an incinerator comprising said heat exchanger | |
| Urian et al. | Conversion in a Large-Scale Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler Using Palm Kernel | |
| Goral et al. | CFB boilers in multifuel application | |
| Broden et al. | Aggregation of experience from converted forest industrial fluidized bedboilers; Erfarenhetssammanstaellning fraan konverterade fluidiserad-baeddpannor |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| DA2 | Applications for amendment section 104 |
Free format text: THE NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT IS AS SHOWN IN THE STATEMENT(S) FILED 15 JUL 2014 . |
|
| DA3 | Amendments made section 104 |
Free format text: THE NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT IS AS SHOWN IN THE STATEMENT(S) FILED 15 JUL 2014 |
|
| FGA | Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent) | ||
| MK14 | Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired |