US20030115830A1 - Hijacker/airborne attack prevention system - Google Patents
Hijacker/airborne attack prevention system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20030115830A1 US20030115830A1 US10/300,684 US30068402A US2003115830A1 US 20030115830 A1 US20030115830 A1 US 20030115830A1 US 30068402 A US30068402 A US 30068402A US 2003115830 A1 US2003115830 A1 US 2003115830A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- building
- cables
- high strength
- attached
- prevention system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 10
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003796 beauty Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 206010010144 Completed suicide Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009828 non-uniform distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/02—Plate construction
- F41H5/023—Armour plate, or auxiliary armour plate mounted at a distance of the main armour plate, having cavities at its outer impact surface, or holes, for deflecting the projectile
- F41H5/026—Slat armour; Nets
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04H—BUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
- E04H9/00—Buildings, groups of buildings or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake or extreme climate
- E04H9/04—Buildings, groups of buildings or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake or extreme climate against air-raid or other war-like actions
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
- F41H11/02—Anti-aircraft or anti-guided missile or anti-torpedo defence installations or systems
Definitions
- the present invention comprises a system for arranging high strength cables with the intentions of diverting, discouraging, and/or preventing an attack on a structure, potentially containing a large number of people. Therefore this system of arrangement is intended so as to dissuade a hijacker from targeting the building, or buildings, which use the present invention. Such an invention would likewise serve to delay any attacks on such a building.
- the high strength cables used will have the ability to tear or damage the wings of an aircraft, should the aircraft attempt to collide into a building—or causing the aircraft to be diverted.
- the method may be arranged in a manner which is deployable at will, or, upon a sensed condition, by, for example, radar, heat, etc. Therefore when there is no fear of threat, the cable structure may be retracted so as to maintain the aesthetic beauty of the building, and in turn the city skyline.
- a preferred embodiment of the present invention is a tent, or a web like structure encapsulating a single, or multiple buildings, or locations.
- High strength cables can be supported at the roof of a building via rods extending, either upwards or outward, from the roof. Alternatively, such cables can be affixed directly to the associated structures. High strength cables extend down in an angled fashion, thus keeping the cables away from the building, and are secured in place by support beams at a variable distance down the side of the building, particularly as far down as physically possible so as to not interfere with surrounding buildings.
- the deployed configuration can comprise any number of configurations, including, but not limited to, conical, cylindrical, rectangular, etc.
- a preferred embodiment of the present invention is one which the arrangement of cables incorporates a plurality of buildings in the same vicinity.
- High strength cables extend between buildings so that a cable will run from the roof of a building to the roof of a shorter building. Consequently, such an extension may also cover a number of other buildings shorter than the shorter of the two buildings.
- This assembly may be arranged in many different manners, a tent shape (e.g. with the tallest building being the apex of the arrangement), or a non-uniform distribution of cables extending over a conglomerate of buildings.
- Another preferred embodiment of the present invention comprises the use of a high strength rod configuration, or tower, or similar rigid structure that is extended from the roof of a building by beams.
- the cables will then, essentially, hang from this structure, and extend down the building in an angled fashion and be supported at a variable distance down each side of a building with supporting beams.
- the entire structure, as well as the other disclosed structures herein, may be physically attached or formed with a portion of the frame structure of an associated building for securement thereto.
- Yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention allows the cable structure to be readily deployed and retracted when not in use, so as to retain the aesthetics of the buildings and city skyline.
- a structure may include a rigid structure from which cables are attached via pulleys.
- the pulleys may contain additional cable line to be used when deploying the cable structure.
- Support beams can be held against the building in a deployable manner, on pivotable and lockable tracks/hinges (or be slidably positioned within the building at, for example, a floor of the building not occupying tenants—such as the HVAC floor).
- Other locations physically associated with, or adjacent to the building are also contemplated.
- the lower end of the beam will extend outward, and the upper end will essentially slide down the side of the building, terminating when the beam is protruding from the building.
- Another preferred embodiment of the present invention comprises the construction of a plurality of columns extending from the ground up to, or exceeding, the height of the building or structure—wherein cables are attached to the columns, at different heights, surrounding the perimeter of the building, essentially creating a barrier thereto.
- FIG. 1 is a front view of one embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 2 is a front view of another embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 3A is a top view of the invention
- FIG. 3B is a perspective view of the invention
- FIG. 3C is a perspective view of another embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 4A is a side view of an embodiment of the invention in an undeployed state
- FIG. 4B is a side view of the invention of FIG. 4A partially deployed
- FIG. 4C is a side view of the invention of FIG. 4A fully deployed
- FIG. 5 is a side view of another embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 6 is a side view of another embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 1 a method of arranging a plurality of cables so as to protect a building, bridge, or structure from potential attack from aircrafts, or airborne attacks is shown.
- Such an arrangement comprises attaching high strength cables 3 to the edges of the top of a building 1 .
- the cables 3 are secured to support beams 2 which may protrude from the center of each side of the building.
- the support beams 2 may protrude from the building in either an angled, acutely or obtusely, or perpendicular manner.
- Conventional methods of attaching articles in a secure fashion are to be employed in the attachment of cables and support beams.
- protection may be increased with the addition of another assembly of cables 4 which are horizontally coupled to each of the vertically hung cables 2 extending from the top of the building and terminating at the support beams 2 .
- the cables can be secured to the ground, or other separate structures. This assembly creates a web-like structure surrounding the building, either in part or in its entirety.
- FIG. 2 depicts another embodiment of the invention where pluralities of cables 3 are attached to the tops of a conglomerate of buildings throughout a metropolitan area.
- a cable 3 originates from the top of a building and terminates at the top of another, preferably shorter building.
- a multiplicity of cables may emanate or terminate from a single building depending on the degree of security desired, its location within an area, and moreover, its relative height with respect to buildings surrounding it. This method of arranging cables 3 has the advantage of not only protecting those buildings which the cables extend between, but also those buildings which lie below.
- a rigid upper support structure 6 i.e. a circular, rod-like structure
- This upper support structure 6 may be secured to the building where the upper support beams 5 are attached in either an angled or perpendicular manner.
- FIG. 3A shows four support beams 5
- additional (or less) upper support beams 5 may be employed for added support.
- an additional four upper support beams may be attached in the center of each side of the building.
- the upper support structure 6 may comprise a polygonal shape as opposed to the depicted circular shape.
- a plurality of high strength cables 3 are hung from the upper support structure 6 .
- a plurality of eight cables 3 are depicted such that there is a cable emanating from each corner of the building 1 along with cables emanating from the center of each side of the building 1 .
- a minimum of four cables 3 are preferred, such that the cables are hung in a symmetrical fashion so as to provide a uniform level of security.
- the cables 3 are secured by lower support beams 2 , as described in FIG. 1A, protruding from the building at a variable distance down the side of the building.
- the cables may be attached to other structures as depicted in FIG. 2 or may extend to ground level.
- the cables 3 attached to the upper support structure 6 may extend down the length of the building whereby they are secured on the ground level.
- a plurality of horizontal cables 4 may be attached to the vertical cables 3 extending down the sides of the building to create a higher level of protection.
- FIG. 4A is a side view of the system in a “closed” position. Support beams 2 are secured against the side of the building on a track 8 . Similar to that described in FIGS. 3A and 3B, a rigid structure 6 is included to keep the cables away from the building. In this embodiment, the cables are hung from such a structure by pulleys 7 which have a hollow interior chamber which allows for the storage of additional cable line necessary for deploying the protection system. As can be seen in FIG.
- the top end of the support beam when deployed, the top end of the support beam is fashioned to slide down alongside the building, subsequently causing the bottom end of the support beam to extend outward.
- the support beams 2 When fully deployed (FIG. 4C), the support beams 2 are perpendicular to the building. Alternatively, when fully deployed, the support beams 2 may extend from the building in an angled manner as opposed to the perpendicular manner shown. Other retractable configurations can be created due to the flexibility of the cable. Also, the shape does not need to be of a pyramid type, for example, it could be an inverted pyramid, or even a cylinder or a 3-D rectangle.
- FIG. 5 illustrates yet another protective cable system.
- a minimum of four columns 10 are erected around the perimeter of a building. It is preferred that the columns 10 be positioned at each corner of the building. However such positioning may be altered according to various conditions, such as space limitations or the like.
- High strength cables 3 are attached to the columns 10 at varying horizontal positions so as to provide a barrier around the building.
- additional cables 4 may be included to vertically connect the horizontal cables 3 so as to provide a higher level of protection.
- buildings which hold historic or aesthetic value
- many building owners, although in need of protection from airborne attacks may not want to physically alter the appearance of the building. This particular embodiment allows for no physical changes to be made to the building itself.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a cable arrangement which provides protection to a plurality of buildings within a particular area.
- a column 10 is erected in a metropolitan area or the like which will provide a central unit from which a plurality of high strength cables 3 will radiate from.
- the cables 3 terminate upon the roof tops or sides of different buildings 1 within the vicinity of the column 10 .
- the cables may be attached to the buildings using conventional fastening means.
- the support beams may be comprised of a number of rigid materials, i.e. metal, cement, or the like.
- Support beams may further include a means to prevent bending or bowing caused by high wind conditions, i.e. small holes to allow the passage of air there-through. As such bending or bowing would cause movement of the cables, it is important to minimize such movement so as to preclude excessive wear which may compromise the attachment means.
- the cables may comprise various types of high strength materials currently commercially available.
- the cables may be electrically charged such that should an aircraft or the like come into contact with the cables, they will receive an electric shock. Such a shock would be intended to cause a malfunction of the aircraft.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Emergency Management (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention comprises an airborne attack prevention system utilizing a plurality of high strength cables attached to one or more buildings so as to shield the buildings from collisions from aircraft and the like.
Description
- Recently there has been a heightened level of awareness regarding acts of terrorism. Moreover, the threat and potential impact of danger has appeared to increase 10-fold. The majority of terrorist attacks have been executed by many different types of bombs. Prior art has been targeted at protecting buildings from terrorist acts on ground level. For instance, providing protection from vehicular attacks, and structural modifications, in an attempt to minimize damage from explosives. For example, a vehicle barrier which uses similar high strength cables on the ground level supported by I-beams can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,576,507.
- In light of recent terrorist acts, particularly the terrorist attacks of Sep. 11, 2001, wherein terrorists hijacked a number of aircrafts to be used in an apparent suicide mission regarding crashing into buildings, namely, the World Trade Center Buildings in New York and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., there appears to be a need for above ground protection of large buildings. There were no protection or prevention measures used by these buildings, which, consequently resulted in thousands of casualties.
- Thus, it is an objective of the invention to provide a method of protecting buildings, and the people within them, by preventing and/or diverting potential terrorist attacks by aircrafts.
- It is another objective of the invention to provide a method of protecting buildings, bridges, and the people within them, by preventing and/or diverting potential terrorist attacks by aircrafts, airborne missiles (or other devices or crafts which could cause damage to a structure upon impact or exposure) while maintaining aesthetics of a city's sky line.
- These and further objectives will become apparent in light of the specification appended hereto.
- The present invention comprises a system for arranging high strength cables with the intentions of diverting, discouraging, and/or preventing an attack on a structure, potentially containing a large number of people. Therefore this system of arrangement is intended so as to dissuade a hijacker from targeting the building, or buildings, which use the present invention. Such an invention would likewise serve to delay any attacks on such a building.
- The high strength cables used will have the ability to tear or damage the wings of an aircraft, should the aircraft attempt to collide into a building—or causing the aircraft to be diverted.
- Inasmuch as many cities may view the present invention as an eyesore, the method may be arranged in a manner which is deployable at will, or, upon a sensed condition, by, for example, radar, heat, etc. Therefore when there is no fear of threat, the cable structure may be retracted so as to maintain the aesthetic beauty of the building, and in turn the city skyline.
- A preferred embodiment of the present invention is a tent, or a web like structure encapsulating a single, or multiple buildings, or locations. High strength cables can be supported at the roof of a building via rods extending, either upwards or outward, from the roof. Alternatively, such cables can be affixed directly to the associated structures. High strength cables extend down in an angled fashion, thus keeping the cables away from the building, and are secured in place by support beams at a variable distance down the side of the building, particularly as far down as physically possible so as to not interfere with surrounding buildings. Furthermore, the deployed configuration can comprise any number of configurations, including, but not limited to, conical, cylindrical, rectangular, etc.
- Alternatively, a preferred embodiment of the present invention is one which the arrangement of cables incorporates a plurality of buildings in the same vicinity. High strength cables extend between buildings so that a cable will run from the roof of a building to the roof of a shorter building. Consequently, such an extension may also cover a number of other buildings shorter than the shorter of the two buildings. This assembly may be arranged in many different manners, a tent shape (e.g. with the tallest building being the apex of the arrangement), or a non-uniform distribution of cables extending over a conglomerate of buildings.
- Another preferred embodiment of the present invention comprises the use of a high strength rod configuration, or tower, or similar rigid structure that is extended from the roof of a building by beams. The cables will then, essentially, hang from this structure, and extend down the building in an angled fashion and be supported at a variable distance down each side of a building with supporting beams. The entire structure, as well as the other disclosed structures herein, may be physically attached or formed with a portion of the frame structure of an associated building for securement thereto.
- Yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention allows the cable structure to be readily deployed and retracted when not in use, so as to retain the aesthetics of the buildings and city skyline. For example, such a structure may include a rigid structure from which cables are attached via pulleys. Additionally, the pulleys may contain additional cable line to be used when deploying the cable structure. Support beams can be held against the building in a deployable manner, on pivotable and lockable tracks/hinges (or be slidably positioned within the building at, for example, a floor of the building not occupying tenants—such as the HVAC floor). Other locations physically associated with, or adjacent to the building are also contemplated. In such an example, the lower end of the beam will extend outward, and the upper end will essentially slide down the side of the building, terminating when the beam is protruding from the building.
- Another preferred embodiment of the present invention comprises the construction of a plurality of columns extending from the ground up to, or exceeding, the height of the building or structure—wherein cables are attached to the columns, at different heights, surrounding the perimeter of the building, essentially creating a barrier thereto.
- FIG. 1 is a front view of one embodiment of the invention;
- FIG. 2 is a front view of another embodiment of the invention;
- FIG. 3A is a top view of the invention;
- FIG. 3B is a perspective view of the invention;
- FIG. 3C is a perspective view of another embodiment of the invention;
- FIG. 4A is a side view of an embodiment of the invention in an undeployed state;
- FIG. 4B is a side view of the invention of FIG. 4A partially deployed;
- FIG. 4C is a side view of the invention of FIG. 4A fully deployed;
- FIG. 5 is a side view of another embodiment of the invention; and
- FIG. 6 is a side view of another embodiment of the invention.
- While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail several specific embodiments with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the embodiments illustrated.
- Referring now to the figures, and in particular FIG. 1, a method of arranging a plurality of cables so as to protect a building, bridge, or structure from potential attack from aircrafts, or airborne attacks is shown. Such an arrangement comprises attaching
high strength cables 3 to the edges of the top of a building 1. Thecables 3 are secured to supportbeams 2 which may protrude from the center of each side of the building. Furthermore thesupport beams 2 may protrude from the building in either an angled, acutely or obtusely, or perpendicular manner. Conventional methods of attaching articles in a secure fashion are to be employed in the attachment of cables and support beams. Furthermore, protection may be increased with the addition of another assembly ofcables 4 which are horizontally coupled to each of the vertically hungcables 2 extending from the top of the building and terminating at the support beams 2. Instead of, or as well as, support beams, the cables can be secured to the ground, or other separate structures. This assembly creates a web-like structure surrounding the building, either in part or in its entirety. - Alternatively, FIG. 2 depicts another embodiment of the invention where pluralities of
cables 3 are attached to the tops of a conglomerate of buildings throughout a metropolitan area. Acable 3 originates from the top of a building and terminates at the top of another, preferably shorter building. A multiplicity of cables may emanate or terminate from a single building depending on the degree of security desired, its location within an area, and moreover, its relative height with respect to buildings surrounding it. This method of arrangingcables 3 has the advantage of not only protecting those buildings which the cables extend between, but also those buildings which lie below. - Focusing on FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C, a rigid upper support structure 6 (i.e. a circular, rod-like structure), is extended from the top of a building by
support beams 5. Thisupper support structure 6 may be secured to the building where the upper support beams 5 are attached in either an angled or perpendicular manner. Although FIG. 3A shows foursupport beams 5, additional (or less) upper support beams 5 may be employed for added support. For instance, an additional four upper support beams may be attached in the center of each side of the building. Theupper support structure 6 may comprise a polygonal shape as opposed to the depicted circular shape. A plurality ofhigh strength cables 3 are hung from theupper support structure 6. A plurality of eightcables 3 are depicted such that there is a cable emanating from each corner of the building 1 along with cables emanating from the center of each side of the building 1. However, a minimum of fourcables 3 are preferred, such that the cables are hung in a symmetrical fashion so as to provide a uniform level of security. Thecables 3 are secured bylower support beams 2, as described in FIG. 1A, protruding from the building at a variable distance down the side of the building. Alternatively, the cables may be attached to other structures as depicted in FIG. 2 or may extend to ground level. As depicted in 3C, thecables 3 attached to theupper support structure 6 may extend down the length of the building whereby they are secured on the ground level. Furthermore, a plurality ofhorizontal cables 4 may be attached to thevertical cables 3 extending down the sides of the building to create a higher level of protection. - FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C depict a cable arrangement which is deployable, which will allows for the maintenance of the aesthetic beauty of a city's skyline. FIG. 4A, is a side view of the system in a “closed” position.
Support beams 2 are secured against the side of the building on a track 8. Similar to that described in FIGS. 3A and 3B, arigid structure 6 is included to keep the cables away from the building. In this embodiment, the cables are hung from such a structure bypulleys 7 which have a hollow interior chamber which allows for the storage of additional cable line necessary for deploying the protection system. As can be seen in FIG. 4B, when deployed, the top end of the support beam is fashioned to slide down alongside the building, subsequently causing the bottom end of the support beam to extend outward. When fully deployed (FIG. 4C), the support beams 2 are perpendicular to the building. Alternatively, when fully deployed, the support beams 2 may extend from the building in an angled manner as opposed to the perpendicular manner shown. Other retractable configurations can be created due to the flexibility of the cable. Also, the shape does not need to be of a pyramid type, for example, it could be an inverted pyramid, or even a cylinder or a 3-D rectangle. - FIG. 5 illustrates yet another protective cable system. In this embodiment, a minimum of four
columns 10 are erected around the perimeter of a building. It is preferred that thecolumns 10 be positioned at each corner of the building. However such positioning may be altered according to various conditions, such as space limitations or the like.High strength cables 3 are attached to thecolumns 10 at varying horizontal positions so as to provide a barrier around the building. Again,additional cables 4 may be included to vertically connect thehorizontal cables 3 so as to provide a higher level of protection. As there are a number of buildings which hold historic or aesthetic value, many building owners, although in need of protection from airborne attacks, may not want to physically alter the appearance of the building. This particular embodiment allows for no physical changes to be made to the building itself. - Finally, FIG. 6 illustrates a cable arrangement which provides protection to a plurality of buildings within a particular area. As shown, a
column 10 is erected in a metropolitan area or the like which will provide a central unit from which a plurality ofhigh strength cables 3 will radiate from. Thecables 3 terminate upon the roof tops or sides of different buildings 1 within the vicinity of thecolumn 10. The cables may be attached to the buildings using conventional fastening means. - The support beams may be comprised of a number of rigid materials, i.e. metal, cement, or the like. Support beams may further include a means to prevent bending or bowing caused by high wind conditions, i.e. small holes to allow the passage of air there-through. As such bending or bowing would cause movement of the cables, it is important to minimize such movement so as to preclude excessive wear which may compromise the attachment means.
- The cables may comprise various types of high strength materials currently commercially available. In addition, the cables may be electrically charged such that should an aircraft or the like come into contact with the cables, they will receive an electric shock. Such a shock would be intended to cause a malfunction of the aircraft.
- The foregoing description merely explains and illustrates the invention and the invention should not be limited thereto except insofar as the appended claims are so limited, as those skilled in the art who have the present invention before them will be able to make modifications without departing from the scope of the invention.
Claims (8)
1. An airborne attack prevention system comprising:
a plurality of high strength cables; and
means for attaching at least one of the plurality of high strength cables between two or more buildings.
2. An airborne attack prevention system comprising:
a plurality of high strength cables attached to a top region of a building;
a plurality of support beams protruding from at least one side of a building; and
securing at least one of the plurality of high strength cables to at least one of the plurality of support beams.
3. The airborne attack prevention system according to claim 2 , wherein the plurality of support beam comprises:
at least one upper support beam secured along a top region of a building;
at least one lower support beam protruding from at least one side of a building; and
at least one high strength cable securely attached to and extending between each pair of upper and lower support beams.
4. The invention according to claim 3 , wherein the airborne attack prevention system further comprises:
a rod like structure attached to each of the upper support beams;
a subsequent lower support beam protruding from the side of a building, wherein the subsequent lower support beam is not attached to at least one upper support beam; and
a subsequent high strength cable attached to at least a portion of said rod like structure at a position corresponding to said subsequent lower support beams.
5. The invention according to claim 4 , wherein the rod like structure is of either polygonal or circular shape.
6. The invention according to claim 3 , wherein the airborne attack prevention system further comprising:
a pulley attached to at least one of the upper support beams;
a high strength cable retractably associated with the pulley; and
at least one track, associated with the plurality of lower support beams, laid vertically along the building upon which the associated lower support beam can slide up and down to effectuate an open and closed position.
7. An airborne attack prevention system comprising:
a plurality of columns erected around at least one building; and
a plurality of cables, extended horizontally, at various heights, attached to at least a portion of each of said plurality of columns.
8. An airborne attack prevention system comprising:
at least one column erected within a plurality of buildings; and
a plurality of high strength cables attached to the at least one column, wherein each of said plurality of high strength cables are attached to at least one of said plurality of buildings.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/300,684 US20030115830A1 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-11-20 | Hijacker/airborne attack prevention system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US33610101P | 2001-11-20 | 2001-11-20 | |
| US10/300,684 US20030115830A1 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-11-20 | Hijacker/airborne attack prevention system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20030115830A1 true US20030115830A1 (en) | 2003-06-26 |
Family
ID=26971913
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/300,684 Abandoned US20030115830A1 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-11-20 | Hijacker/airborne attack prevention system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20030115830A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20030127636A1 (en) * | 2001-10-23 | 2003-07-10 | Innofocus Consultants Limited | Vulnerable target protection system |
| WO2005098173A1 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2005-10-20 | Evertz Egon Kg Gmbh & Co | Device for protecting buildings or installations |
| EP1710531A1 (en) * | 2005-04-09 | 2006-10-11 | Diehl BGT Defence GmbH & Co.KG | Arrangement for the protection of a sensitive object |
Citations (18)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US544577A (en) * | 1895-08-13 | Fence-post | ||
| US687356A (en) * | 1900-08-25 | 1901-11-26 | Frederick A Wegner | Braced post-base. |
| US1012947A (en) * | 1911-06-20 | 1911-12-26 | Harry A Weisfeld | Fire-escape. |
| US1664922A (en) * | 1926-07-31 | 1928-04-03 | Goodrich Chauncey Marsh | Support for overhead cables |
| US1670236A (en) * | 1927-06-20 | 1928-05-15 | Frank A Burns | Post |
| US2411316A (en) * | 1944-08-17 | 1946-11-19 | Emil R Capita | Airplane hangar |
| US3368319A (en) * | 1965-08-16 | 1968-02-13 | Granger Associates | Tall column structure of connected sections with warren cross-bracing and legs of channel section |
| US3672105A (en) * | 1970-06-16 | 1972-06-27 | Wikstrand & Berg Ab | Arrangement in staying a telescopic tower by means of stay wires |
| US3751862A (en) * | 1971-04-02 | 1973-08-14 | J Linecker | Pneumatically supported structure |
| US3907066A (en) * | 1974-06-21 | 1975-09-23 | Robert E Newton | Wing-type scaffold system |
| US4000592A (en) * | 1975-06-04 | 1977-01-04 | Kelly Thomas M | Wall supporting structure |
| US4546973A (en) * | 1983-10-03 | 1985-10-15 | Horizon Sports, Inc. | Basketball apparatus |
| US4638611A (en) * | 1986-01-06 | 1987-01-27 | Vaughn Charles R | Guy-wire guard assembly and fastening systems therefor |
| US4912893A (en) * | 1987-12-21 | 1990-04-03 | Miller Harmon R | Transportable CMR cell site |
| US5531419A (en) * | 1992-02-28 | 1996-07-02 | Cue Dee Produktor Ab | Mast base, especially for a temporarily erected mast |
| US5671823A (en) * | 1995-02-01 | 1997-09-30 | Oakes; Keith L. | Collapsible catwalk |
| USD426898S (en) * | 1998-02-11 | 2000-06-20 | Venegas Jr Frank | Combined textured sleeve with stanchion |
| US6176050B1 (en) * | 1997-05-21 | 2001-01-23 | Ted Gower | Flexible protective wind abatement system |
-
2002
- 2002-11-20 US US10/300,684 patent/US20030115830A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (18)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US544577A (en) * | 1895-08-13 | Fence-post | ||
| US687356A (en) * | 1900-08-25 | 1901-11-26 | Frederick A Wegner | Braced post-base. |
| US1012947A (en) * | 1911-06-20 | 1911-12-26 | Harry A Weisfeld | Fire-escape. |
| US1664922A (en) * | 1926-07-31 | 1928-04-03 | Goodrich Chauncey Marsh | Support for overhead cables |
| US1670236A (en) * | 1927-06-20 | 1928-05-15 | Frank A Burns | Post |
| US2411316A (en) * | 1944-08-17 | 1946-11-19 | Emil R Capita | Airplane hangar |
| US3368319A (en) * | 1965-08-16 | 1968-02-13 | Granger Associates | Tall column structure of connected sections with warren cross-bracing and legs of channel section |
| US3672105A (en) * | 1970-06-16 | 1972-06-27 | Wikstrand & Berg Ab | Arrangement in staying a telescopic tower by means of stay wires |
| US3751862A (en) * | 1971-04-02 | 1973-08-14 | J Linecker | Pneumatically supported structure |
| US3907066A (en) * | 1974-06-21 | 1975-09-23 | Robert E Newton | Wing-type scaffold system |
| US4000592A (en) * | 1975-06-04 | 1977-01-04 | Kelly Thomas M | Wall supporting structure |
| US4546973A (en) * | 1983-10-03 | 1985-10-15 | Horizon Sports, Inc. | Basketball apparatus |
| US4638611A (en) * | 1986-01-06 | 1987-01-27 | Vaughn Charles R | Guy-wire guard assembly and fastening systems therefor |
| US4912893A (en) * | 1987-12-21 | 1990-04-03 | Miller Harmon R | Transportable CMR cell site |
| US5531419A (en) * | 1992-02-28 | 1996-07-02 | Cue Dee Produktor Ab | Mast base, especially for a temporarily erected mast |
| US5671823A (en) * | 1995-02-01 | 1997-09-30 | Oakes; Keith L. | Collapsible catwalk |
| US6176050B1 (en) * | 1997-05-21 | 2001-01-23 | Ted Gower | Flexible protective wind abatement system |
| USD426898S (en) * | 1998-02-11 | 2000-06-20 | Venegas Jr Frank | Combined textured sleeve with stanchion |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20030127636A1 (en) * | 2001-10-23 | 2003-07-10 | Innofocus Consultants Limited | Vulnerable target protection system |
| US6902149B2 (en) * | 2001-10-23 | 2005-06-07 | Innofocus Consultants Limited | Vulnerable target protection system |
| WO2005098173A1 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2005-10-20 | Evertz Egon Kg Gmbh & Co | Device for protecting buildings or installations |
| EA008357B1 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2007-04-27 | Эгон Эвертц | Device for protecting buildings or installations |
| US20080229705A1 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2008-09-25 | Egon Evertz | Device for Protecting Buildings or Installations |
| EP1710531A1 (en) * | 2005-04-09 | 2006-10-11 | Diehl BGT Defence GmbH & Co.KG | Arrangement for the protection of a sensitive object |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6886299B2 (en) | Blast curtain | |
| US7380379B2 (en) | Explosion-absorbing panels and wall structures | |
| ES2655475T3 (en) | Barrier and fence system | |
| US5597005A (en) | Automotive hail protection and shade canopy | |
| DK2401436T3 (en) | Safety-trailer | |
| US20220145658A1 (en) | Systems and methods for self-standing, self-supporting, rapid-deployment, movable communications towers | |
| KR102098196B1 (en) | A Safety Railing with Solar Panel | |
| US9255421B2 (en) | Secure shelter with trapezoidal walls | |
| JPS6299574A (en) | Obstruction apparatus for controlling apparoach to site | |
| RU2251066C2 (en) | Store shelter (variants) | |
| US20190276998A1 (en) | Security barrier and methods | |
| KR101440604B1 (en) | Pedestrian protection fence for sidewalk roadway | |
| US20030115830A1 (en) | Hijacker/airborne attack prevention system | |
| EP2975198B1 (en) | Explosion and bullet resistant wall construction | |
| KR101842652B1 (en) | Antenna camouflage device | |
| EP3568545B1 (en) | Security system | |
| US4464868A (en) | Building construction | |
| US20010022189A1 (en) | Camouflage shelter having a collapsible self-supporting subframe | |
| US20040050014A1 (en) | Passive aerial protection system | |
| US20170254034A1 (en) | Crash Guard | |
| AU2019101418B4 (en) | Screen for roadside barriers | |
| CN112923794B (en) | Intelligent barrier module defending wall | |
| EP3418475A1 (en) | Protective system against hailstone damage for aircrafts | |
| RU2517314C1 (en) | Pneumatic frame structure | |
| EP1442187A1 (en) | Protection device for buildings or installations |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |