JPH10222559A - Used car trade-in estimation assessment processing method and used car trade-in estimation assessment processor - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To allow everybody to easily calculate dealer's assessed price at a proper assessment scheduled time in a short time. SOLUTION: This device specifies a first year registration date of a vehicle to be assessed, a vehicle inspection expiration year, month and date, a maker's name, a vehicle type, mission, grade and body color, decides basic assessed price at an assessment scheduled time by specifying the assessment scheduled time, and modifies the decided basic assessed price through travel distance actual result amount based on travel distance at the assessment scheduled time which is estimated based on the current travel distance data of the vehicle to be assessed and vehicle inspection residual term addition amount due to the residual term of vehicle inspection.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a valuation processing method and apparatus used for valuing a used car.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art The automobile industry is expanding along with changes in economic circumstances, and the used car market is also expanding. As the used car market grows in this way, used car dealers and consumers strongly desire that used cars be bought and sold at an appropriate price. For this reason, a booklet that lists the prices used as the basis of used vehicles set based on various conditions by manufacturer, vehicle type, and grade is issued to traders,
It is also published in various automotive magazines for consumers. The setting of the used car price is searched from the booklet based on the year, the specification, the grade and the degree of popularity at that time.

[0003]

Such a booklet is used when a used car dealer (dealer) determines an assessment price when a used car is taken from a general user. For this reason, in this booklet, prices are set for each manufacturer, each vehicle type, each year, each specification, each grade, and each body color. Therefore, when a general user brings a used car to a used car dealer to sell his / her own car (used car), the used car dealer determines the manufacturer name, model, type,
Used car dealers themselves specify the year, specifications, grade, and body color, and the base assessment price of the car model corresponding to the used car specified in the table compiled in this booklet (new car calculated as a mere article (Remaining price from the price) is selected and determined, taking into account the special degree of the assessor (used car dealer) due to the degree of popularity of the model at present, differences in mileage, damage to various parts, etc. The final assessment price of the subject vehicle was determined.

In this booklet, there are a large number of automobile manufacturers listed, the number of types of vehicles by each manufacturer, the number of types of each type of vehicle, the number of release years for each type, and the grade for each release year. Number, and also
The number of body colors in each grade is also diversified, and accordingly, the number of assessment items for assessment is increasing. However, this booklet is designed for used car dealers (dealers), and is easy to understand even if the used car dealer uses it for the first time (beginner). In this booklet, the details of the assessment are determined in detail, and by specifying these detailed assessments without fail, even beginners can calculate the exact assessment amount if it takes time. Has become. However, this booklet contains many assessment items in detail so that even a beginner can calculate an accurate assessment value, and who can evaluate it accurately. If you do not pay much attention when viewing, you may see the wrong part (such as mistaken steps). In this way, if you make a mistake in the table of the booklet, you will not be able to correctly assess the trade-in valuation of a used car, assess it higher than the standard assessment, or assess it Car prices may not be accurately assessed.

A first object of the present invention is to input the date of registration of the vehicle to be assessed brought in by the user in the first year and the date of expiration of the vehicle inspection, select the manufacturer name, model type, and input the displacement. , Specify the mission, grade, body color of the appraisal vehicle, determine the assessment time, determine the basic assessment price at the assessment time, and determine the basic assessment price to the current mileage data of the assessment object vehicle From the actual mileage based on the mileage at the assessment scheduled time predicted from the forecast, and the vehicle inspection remaining period addition amount based on the remaining period of the vehicle inspection, correct the dealer assessment price at the appropriate assessment scheduled time easily and quickly for anyone The idea is to make it possible.

A second object of the present invention is to input the date of registration of the vehicle to be assessed brought in by the user in the first year and the date of expiration of the vehicle inspection, select the manufacturer, the type of vehicle, and input the displacement. Determine the current basic assessment price of the assessed vehicle by specifying the mission, grade, and body color of the assessed vehicle, and determine the determined basic assessment price based on the actual mileage data based on the current mileage data of the assessed vehicle. Determine the current assessment price of the vehicle to be assessed corrected by the amount and the vehicle inspection remaining period addition amount based on the remaining period until the vehicle inspection expires, and determine the basic assessment price of the desired transfer time of the assessment target vehicle by specifying the desired transfer time, The determined basic assessment price is estimated from the current mileage data of the vehicle to be assessed and the actual mileage based on the mileage at the desired transfer time and the remaining inspection period based on the remaining inspection period. By comparing the assessment price at the desired transfer time of the vehicle to be assessed corrected by the amount, it is easy for anyone to easily determine whether it is a good idea to transfer at the present time in a short time or to transfer at the specified transfer time Is to do so.

[0007]

According to the method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to claim 1 of the present application, when conducting a trade-in assessment of a used car in the future, the first year of registration of the vehicle to be assessed is registered. Date and vehicle inspection expiration date, specify the manufacturer and the displacement of the subject vehicle, specify the vehicle type and mission of the subject vehicle, and check the status of the meter and the subject vehicle. The vehicle to be assessed is identified by specifying the mileage, the scheduled trade-in time of the vehicle to be assessed is identified, and the sales at the time of registration of the first year are stored in advance from the date of registration of the first year. The release period of the vehicle to be assessed is selected from one or more release periods of the same model as the vehicle to be assessed, and the relevant model is selected from the grades stored in advance for the model vehicle in the release period. Assessment target engine type , The number of doors, the number of doors, the supercharger, and the number of passengers are selected, and the vehicle type to be assessed for the vehicle to be assessed is determined from the vehicle type previously released as the vehicle type and the grade of the vehicle type during the release period of the manufacturer. A body color is selected, and the identified vehicle of the subject vehicle is selected from a basic assessment price assessed based on a vehicle type, grade, and body color selected in advance and stored based on a model year. The estimated actual mileage at the scheduled trade-in time calculated based on the current mileage of the vehicle to be assessed at the base assessment price of the model at the scheduled trade-in time, and the standard mileage at the scheduled trade-in time of the vehicle type. The actual mileage based on the amount added / subtracted per km is added based on the distance and the amount of vehicle inspection remaining at the scheduled trade-in time is added per month. The trade-in assessment price is determined by adding the vehicle inspection remaining period addition amount based on the amount. With this configuration, anyone can easily calculate the dealer assessment price at the appropriate assessment schedule time in a short time.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car, comprising: calculating a trade-in assessment price of the subject vehicle at a trade-in scheduled time initially designated; The date is changed to a different trade-in date and specified, and the current base assessment price of the above- Travel based on the amount added / subtracted per km based on the estimated actual travel distance at the planned trade-in time after the change calculated based on the travel distance and the standard travel distance at the planned trade-in time after the change of the vehicle type. The trade-in assessment price is determined by adding the actual distance value and adding the surveillance remaining period addition amount based on the monthly addition amount of the inspection period remaining at the scheduled trade-in time after the change. Trade-in at the scheduled trade-in time specified at the beginning of the car Compared with the trade-in assessment price in trade-scheduled time after the change and the constant price, but that was to be displayed by calculating the difference. With such a configuration, even if the set scheduled assessment time is changed, anyone can easily and easily calculate the dealer assessed price at the appropriate assessed scheduled time after the change.

According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car, comprising: calculating a trade-in assessment price of the subject vehicle at the changed trade-in scheduled time; The month is further changed to a different scheduled trade-in date and identified, and the current base assessment price based on the latest scheduled trade-in date of the subject vehicle is added to the current base price of the subject vehicle. Addition / subtraction per 1 km based on the difference between the expected actual mileage at the latest scheduled trade-in time calculated based on the mileage of the vehicle and the standard mileage at the latest scheduled trade-in time set for the vehicle type Based on the total amount of mileage that is calculated based on the total amount of vehicle inspection remaining period based on the monthly amount of the inspection period remaining at the latest scheduled trade-in period. , Set to the latest of the above vehicles to be assessed To compare the trade-in assessment prices and in trade-scheduled time and the trade-in assessment price in trade-in scheduled time period previously set, in which was to be displayed by calculating the difference. By configuring in this way, even if the changed scheduled assessment time is further changed, anyone can easily and quickly reduce the dealer's assessment price at the revised assessment scheduled time before the dealer's scheduled assessment time before the change. It can be calculated in comparison with the assessed price.

[0010] The method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to claim 4 of the present application is a method of making a trade-in assessment of a used car at a transfer time of a used car. Identify the date, identify the manufacturer and displacement of the target vehicle, specify the type and mission of the target vehicle, specify the meter status and the mileage of the target vehicle. In this way, the vehicle to be assessed is identified, the desired transfer time of the vehicle to be assessed is identified, and the assessment object sold at the time of the registration of the first year is stored in advance from the date of registration of the first year. A release period of the vehicle to be assessed is selected from one or more release periods of a model of the same model as the vehicle, and a grade of the vehicle to be assessed is selected from grades stored in advance for the model vehicle of the release period. engine The vehicle to be assessed is selected by selecting the formula, drive device, number of doors, supercharger, and passenger capacity, and based on the previously stored body color released as the vehicle type and grade of the manufacturer during the release period. Of the vehicle to be assessed from the basic assessment price assessed by a pre-stored year model selected based on the vehicle type, grade and body color of the assessed vehicle. To the basic assessment price of the formula, add the actual mileage based on the amount of addition / subtraction per 1 km based on the current mileage of the subject vehicle and the standard mileage of the vehicle type, and The current trade-in assessment price calculated by adding the surveillance remaining period surcharge based on the monthly sum of the period, and the vehicle type, grade and From the basic assessment price assessed based on the pre-stored model year selected based on the body color, to the basic assessment price of the identified desired transfer time of the subject vehicle, Based on the expected actual mileage at the desired transfer time calculated based on the current mileage and the standard mileage at the desired transfer time of the vehicle type, the actual mileage based on the addition / subtraction amount per km is calculated. In addition to the above, the vehicle inspection remaining price at the desired transfer time is compared with the trade-in assessment price of the desired transfer time obtained by adding the vehicle inspection remaining period additional amount based on the monthly added amount of the vehicle inspection period. The trade-in assessment price is compared with the trade-in assessment price at the desired transfer time, and the difference is calculated and displayed. With this configuration, it is possible to compare the current assessment price of the vehicle to be assessed with the assessment price at the desired transfer time of the vehicle to be assessed, and to determine whether it is a good idea for anyone to easily make the current transfer in a short time, It is possible to easily determine whether it is a good idea to switch to a time.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car, comprising: calculating a trade-in assessment price of a vehicle to be assessed at an initially designated desired transfer time; Is changed to a different desired transfer time and specified, and based on the year-based basic assessment price based on the changed desired transfer time of the target vehicle, based on the current mileage of the target vehicle The actual mileage based on the estimated actual mileage at the scheduled trade-in time after the change calculated based on the mileage and the standard mileage at the desired transfer time after the change of the vehicle type, based on the amount of addition / subtraction per 1 km One of the period of the vehicle inspection remaining at the desired transfer time after the change
The trade-in assessment price is determined by adding the sum of the inspection period remaining based on the monthly sum and the repair / repair subtraction based on the presence / absence of repair / repair locations of the subject vehicle,
The calculated trade-in assessment price is compared with the trade-in assessment price at the desired transfer time after the change, and the difference is calculated and displayed. With this configuration, even if another desired transfer time is specified from the set desired transfer time, anyone can easily and quickly evaluate the initially determined desired transfer time and the desired transfer time after the change. Can be easily determined whether it is a good idea to switch to the originally specified desired transfer time or to change to the specified transfer time after the change.

According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a processing method for predicting a trade-in of a used car, wherein when there is a change in the current state of the exterior of the vehicle to be assessed, an addition / subtraction amount based on the current state of the exterior is obtained, and The appraisal is made by adding the current amount of addition and subtraction to the above-mentioned trade-in assessment price. With this configuration, anyone can easily calculate the appropriate dealer assessment price in consideration of the current state of the exterior in a short time.

According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of processing for predicting a trade-in of a used car according to the present invention. The appraisal is made by adding the current amount of addition and subtraction to the trade-in assessment price. With this configuration, anyone can easily and quickly calculate an appropriate dealer assessment price in consideration of the current state of the interior.

[0014] In the processing method for predicting trade-in of a used car according to claim 8 of the present application, when there is a change in the current state of the electrical components of the vehicle to be assessed, an addition / subtraction amount based on the current state of the electrical components is obtained.
In the present invention, the amount of addition and subtraction according to the current state of the electrical components is assessed in consideration of the trade-in assessment price. With this configuration, anyone can easily and quickly calculate an appropriate dealer assessment price in consideration of the current state of electrical components.

According to a ninth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention. Is determined by taking into account the amount of addition and subtraction based on the current state of the institution and undercarriage, in addition to the trade-in assessment price. With this configuration, anyone can easily and quickly calculate an appropriate dealer assessment price in consideration of the current state of the engine and undercarriage.

[0016] The processing method for predicting trade-in of a used car according to the tenth aspect of the present invention changes in each of the present condition of the exterior, the present condition of the interior, the present condition of the electric components, and the present condition of the engine and underbody of the subject vehicle. If there is, the addition and subtraction amount based on the current state of the exterior, the addition and subtraction amount based on the current state of the interior, the addition and subtraction amount based on the current state of the electrical components, and the addition and subtraction amount based on the current state of the engine and undercarriage are obtained. Each of the addition and subtraction amount, the addition and subtraction amount based on the current state of the interior, the addition and subtraction amount based on the current state of electrical components, and the addition and subtraction amount based on the current state of the engine and undercarriage are added to the above-mentioned trade-in assessment price. . With this configuration, anyone can easily and quickly calculate an appropriate dealer assessment price according to the current state of the exterior, the current state of the interior, the current state of the electrical components, and the current state of the engine and underbody.

[0017] In the processing method for predicting trade-in of a used car according to claim 11 of the present application, the present condition of the exterior is determined by the presence or absence of a repair history,
It depends on whether there is any modification, whether or not all painting is necessary, and whether or not it is the current accident vehicle. With this configuration, the current state of the exterior can be accurately grasped, appropriately reflected in the dealer assessment price, and the appropriate final assessment price can be easily and quickly calculated by anyone.

[0018] The processing method for predicting a trade-in of a used car according to claim 12 of the present application is a method for determining whether or not there is a problem in the interior of the vehicle, whether or not there is a problem in the condition of the trunk room, and whether or not there is a smell of cigarettes and pets. Either there is a problem or there is no problem with the dashboard being damaged. With this configuration, the present situation of the interior can be accurately grasped, appropriately reflected in the dealer assessment price, and the appropriate final assessment price can be easily and quickly calculated by anyone.

[0019] According to a thirteenth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a processing method for estimating a trade-in of a used car, wherein the current state of the electric components is determined based on whether an air conditioner can be used, whether a battery can be used, whether a clock can be used, or not.
Either use of the front left of the power window, use of the back left of the power window, use of the front right of the power window, use of the back right of the power window, use of the wiper, use of the meter panel, or It was made. With this configuration,
The current status of electrical components can be accurately grasped and appropriately reflected in dealer assessment prices, so that anyone can easily calculate the appropriate final assessment price in a short time.

[0020] In the processing method for predicting a trade-in of a used car according to claim 14 of the present application, the present condition of the engine and underbody is based on whether or not the engine can be used normally, whether or not the mission can be used normally, and a power transmission device. Normal use of steering, normal use of steering, normal use of suspension, normal use of brakes, normal use of muffler, other normal use of engine and undercarriage It is either one of yes or no. With this configuration, the present situation of the engine and underbody can be accurately grasped, appropriately reflected in the dealer assessment price, and the appropriate assessment price can be easily and quickly calculated by anyone.

According to a fifteenth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a processing apparatus for predicting a trade-in of a used car, which includes a maker selecting means for selecting a maker of a vehicle to be assessed from a number of manufacturers stored in advance. Date of registration of the target car for the first year,
First year registration etc. input means for inputting the exhaust date of vehicle inspection and displacement, the manufacturer selected by the manufacturer selection means, first year registration date and displacement input by the first year registration etc. input means Vehicle type selection means for selecting the vehicle type of the vehicle to be assessed from among the vehicle types of the manufacturer released on the first year registration date stored in advance based on the The travel distance input means for inputting the travel distance, the scheduled trade-in time specifying means for inputting the trade-in scheduled time of the vehicle to be assessed, and the vehicle type of the vehicle to be assessed selected by the vehicle type selecting means are determined in advance. The grade selection means for selecting the grade of the vehicle to be assessed from the plurality of grades existing in the stored vehicle type and the input by means of the first year registration or the like input means. Release of the vehicle to be assessed from one or more release periods of the same model as the vehicle to be assessed that was previously sold from the date of registration for the first year and that was sold at the date of registration for the first year Release period selecting means for selecting a period, and body color selection for selecting a body color of the subject vehicle from a plurality of body colors stored in advance based on the release period selected by the release period selecting means. Means and a basic model of the year of the vehicle to be assessed from among a plurality of pre-stored basic assessment prices which are assessed for each year selected based on the model type, grade and body color of the vehicle to be assessed. Selecting an assessment price, and adding the base assessment price to the estimated actual mileage at the scheduled trade-in time calculated based on the current mileage of the vehicle to be assessed; The actual mileage based on the amount added / subtracted per km is added based on the standard mileage at the scheduled time and the vehicle inspection remaining based on the monthly added amount of the scrutiny period remaining at the scheduled trade-in time. And an evaluation price calculation means for determining the trade-in evaluation price by adding the period addition amount. With this configuration, anyone can easily calculate the dealer assessment price at the appropriate assessment schedule time in a short time.

The processing apparatus for predicting trade-in of a used car according to claim 16 of the present application calculates the trade-in assessment price at the originally designated trade-in scheduled time of the vehicle to be assessed, and then calculates the trade-in estimated price at the scheduled trade-in time. The trade-in time change means for specifying the date by changing the trade-in time to a different trade-in time, and the basic basic assessment price based on the date of the trade-in time after the change of the subject vehicle, The estimated actual mileage of the planned trade-in time after the change calculated based on the current mileage of the vehicle to be assessed, and the mileage and the standard mileage at the planned trade-in time after the change of the vehicle type are slightly different. Based on the addition and subtraction amount per 1 km based on the vehicle inspection period and the vehicle inspection remaining period addition amount based on the monthly addition amount of the inspection period remaining at the scheduled trade-in time after the change. Appraisal price calculation means for determining the assessment price A trade-in assessment price comparing means for comparing the trade-in assessment price of the subject vehicle at the scheduled trade-in time originally designated with the trade-in assessment price at the changed trade-in schedule and calculating and displaying the difference And With such a configuration, even if the set scheduled assessment time is changed, anyone can easily and easily calculate the dealer assessed price at the appropriate assessed scheduled time after the change.

A processing apparatus for predicting trade-in of a used car according to claim 17 of the present application includes a maker selecting means for selecting a maker of a vehicle to be assessed from a number of manufacturers stored in advance, and an assessment. Date of registration of the target car for the first year,
First year registration input means for inputting the exhaust date and vehicle displacement, the first year registration etc., the manufacturer selected by the manufacturer selection means, and the first year registration date and displacement input by the first year registration etc. input means Vehicle type selection means for selecting the vehicle type of the vehicle to be assessed from among the vehicle types of the manufacturer released on the first year registration date stored in advance based on the The travel distance input means for inputting the travel distance, the desired transfer time specifying means for inputting the desired transfer time of the vehicle to be assessed, and the vehicle type of the vehicle to be assessed selected by the vehicle type selecting means are stored in advance. The grade selection means for selecting the grade of the vehicle to be assessed from among a plurality of grades present in the relevant vehicle type, and the input means for the first year registration etc. Release of the vehicle to be assessed from one or more release periods of the same model as the vehicle to be assessed that was previously sold from the date of registration for the first year and that was sold at the date of registration for the first year Release period selecting means for selecting a period, and body color selection for selecting a body color of the subject vehicle from a plurality of body colors stored in advance based on the release period selected by the release period selecting means. Means and the current model year of the vehicle to be assessed from among a plurality of pre-stored basic assessment prices that have been assessed by model year selected based on the vehicle type, grade and body color of the vehicle to be assessed. Is selected based on the current mileage of the vehicle to be assessed and the standard mileage of the vehicle type to date based on the basic mileage. Current assessment price calculation for adding the actual mileage based on the addition / subtraction amount and adding the vehicle inspection remaining period addition amount based on the monthly addition amount for the currently remaining inspection period to determine the current trade-in assessment price Means and a basic model of the year of the vehicle to be assessed from among a plurality of pre-stored basic assessment prices which are respectively assessed by the model selected based on the vehicle type, grade and body color of the vehicle to be assessed. Select an assessment price,
The estimated actual mileage of the desired transfer time calculated based on the current mileage of the assessment target vehicle,
Based on the difference between the mileage and the standard mileage at the desired transfer time of the vehicle type, add the actual mileage amount based on the amount of addition / subtraction per 1 km, and per month of the vehicle inspection period remaining at the desired transfer time A desired transfer time assessment price calculating means for determining the desired transfer time assessment price by adding the vehicle inspection remaining period addition amount based on the added amount of the current inspection price calculated by the current assessment price calculation means; And an evaluation price comparison calculating means for comparing the estimated transfer price calculated by the desired transfer time evaluation price calculation means with the assessed price at the desired transfer time and calculating and displaying the difference. With this configuration, it is possible to compare the current assessment price of the vehicle to be assessed with the assessment price at the desired transfer time of the vehicle to be assessed, and to determine whether it is a good idea for anyone to easily make the current transfer in a short time, It is possible to easily determine whether it is a good idea to switch to a time.

[0024] The processing apparatus for predicting trade-in of a used car according to claim 18 of the present application calculates the trade-in assessment price of the subject vehicle at the originally designated desired transfer time, and then calculates the date of the desired transfer time. To the desired transfer time, which is different from the desired transfer time, and the basic assessment price based on the desired transfer time after the change of the subject vehicle. The estimated actual mileage of the desired transfer time after the change calculated based on the current mileage, and the amount of addition / subtraction per 1 km based on the difference between the mileage and the standard mileage at the desired transfer time after the change of the vehicle type. Based on the total amount of mileage based on the vehicle inspection, and the additional amount of vehicle inspection remaining period based on the amount added per month for the period of vehicle inspection remaining at the desired transfer time after the change. Repair parts available The appraisal price calculation means that determines the trade-in assessment price taking into account the repair / repair subtraction amount based on the above, compares the calculated trade-in assessment price calculated above with the trade-in assessment price at the desired transfer time after the change. And a trade-in assessment price comparison means for calculating and displaying the difference. With this configuration, even if another desired transfer time is specified from the set desired transfer time, anyone can easily and quickly evaluate the initially determined desired transfer time and the desired transfer time after the change. Can be easily determined whether it is a good idea to switch to the originally specified desired transfer time or to change to the specified transfer time after the change.

The processing device for predicting trade-in of a used car according to claim 19 of the present application changes the present condition of the exterior of the subject vehicle, the present condition of the interior, the present condition of the electric components, and the present condition of the engine and underbody. If there is, the addition / subtraction amount calculation means based on the current state change for obtaining the addition / subtraction amount for the current state change, the addition / subtraction amount based on the current state of the exterior determined by the addition / subtraction amount calculation means, and the addition / subtraction based on the current state of the interior. Applicable items such as the amount, the amount of addition and subtraction based on the current state of electrical components, and the amount of addition and subtraction based on the current state of the engine and undercarriage are assessed in consideration of the trade-in assessment price at the desired transfer time.

With this configuration, it is possible to specify the desired transfer time in consideration of the current state of the exterior, the current state of the interior, the current state of the electrical components, and the current state of the engine and undercarriage, and thereby determine the desired transfer time of the vehicle to be assessed. The assessment price is determined, and the determined basic assessment price is corrected based on the actual mileage based on the mileage at the desired transfer time predicted from the current mileage data of the assessment target vehicle. Compare the current status, interior current status, electrical component status, engine and undercarriage status with the assessed price, and evaluate whether it is a good idea to make it easy for anyone to transfer at the present time in a short time. It is possible to easily determine whether it is a good idea to transfer.

[0027]

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below. 1 to 24 show an embodiment of a processing method of a trade-in prediction estimation of a used car and a processing device of a trade-in prediction evaluation of a used car according to the present invention. Although the processing method of the used car trade-in prediction assessment and the processing apparatus of the used car trade-in prediction assessment do not intend to switch to a new car or another used car at present, but will change in the near future, ) Is to estimate how much the current car will trade in, and use it as a reference when transferring. The processing method of the trade-in prediction estimation of a used car according to the present invention is processed by a computer, and FIG. 1 to FIG. An assessment process flowchart showing the mode is shown.

Referring to FIG. 1, in step 1, customer information of a customer who has requested a trade-in prediction assessment of a vehicle to be assessed (current vehicle) and selection of a vehicle type are performed. The customer information includes the name of the customer who requested the current car trade-in forecast,
There is an address and telephone number. The name of the customer is the name of the person who requested the trader to estimate the trade-in of the current vehicle. The address and telephone number are the address of the person who requested the trader to evaluate the trade-in. And phone numbers help identify customers and help them organize customer lists.

Further, necessary information of the current vehicle for selecting the type of the current vehicle is input. The current vehicle information for selecting the model type of the current vehicle includes the first year registration date, registration number, vehicle inspection expiration date, bogie number, manufacturer / displacement, vehicle type / type, and current vehicle mileage. Further, it is necessary to specify the time when the transfer of the current vehicle is scheduled, that is, the time when the trade-in is scheduled. Only by specifying these, a trade-in prediction assessment can be made. If necessary, the mission, A / C presence / absence, S / R presence / absence, meter status, and input items of the assessment division and assessment staff are provided as information of the assessor. The first year registration date is the date registered with the Land Transportation Bureau (Kanto Land Transportation Bureau in the case of the Kanto region) when the vehicle was purchased with a new car, and is, for example, December 8, 1995. The first year registration date is an important matter in determining the year formula.
If it is March 8, the model year of the current car is from January 1995 to 1995
It is a car released in December of the year.

The registration number is a number registered with the Land Transport Office and is a number displayed on a license plate. For example, Nerima-33
-8304 and the like. The vehicle inspection expiration date is the date when the vehicle inspection actually expires. If the current vehicle is less than three years from the first year registration date, the day before the response date three years after the first year registration year,
That is, for example, if the first year registration date is December 8, 1995, the vehicle inspection expiration date is December 7, 1998. In the case of the second and subsequent vehicle inspections, the vehicle inspection is performed for two years, so it is the fifth and seventh years from the registration date of the first year. The chassis number is a number assigned to each vehicle, for example, 88888. Manufacturer / displacement
When the bogie number is entered, a plurality of manufacturer names (all target manufacturers, Toyota, Nissan,
Honda, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, etc.) are displayed, and the manufacturer name corresponding to the current vehicle can be selected from these. When a manufacturer name corresponding to the current vehicle, for example, Toyota is selected from the displayed manufacturer names, the displacement of the current vehicle can be input. When the displacement of the current vehicle is input, for example, as 3000 cc, the vehicle type / type sold by the manufacturer is started. The vehicle type / type of the current vehicle is selected from among the released vehicle types / types, for example, as a crown sedan.

The mission is to select an automatic transmission or a manual transmission, and the state of the current vehicle mission, for example, an automatic transmission is input. A / C
Is an air conditioner, which selects the presence or absence of an air conditioner.
In the case of current ordinary cars, air conditioning is standard. S / R is a sunroof and selects whether or not a sunroof is provided. In the case of a current ordinary passenger car, the sunroof is not provided as standard equipment. In addition, it is the meter status, whether the meter status is returned (whether there is a history of return) or not, the meter with the current was replaced with the new meter from the meter that was attached from the beginning of the current car release Enter something (if you have a history of replacement) or something else (normal). When this mission, the presence / absence of A / C, and the presence / absence of S / R are input, the input of the current vehicle mileage starts. The current vehicle mileage is the total mileage of the current vehicle up to the present and is a necessary input item, which is the basis of mileage evaluation (Km assessment). Even if the current vehicle mileage is input, the vehicle travels far beyond the reference mileage of the current vehicle (the average mileage traveled by the current vehicle from the date of registration in the first year to the current time). In the case of ultra-high traveling (for example, when the reference traveling distance is 11,000K
In the case of a traveling distance exceeding 50,000 km even though the distance is m, the assessment is in principle impossible (assessment is not possible), and if the processing is to be continued, the assessment is not the main assessment but a provisional assessment. The current vehicle travel distance may be the total travel distance traveled by the time the current vehicle was assessed, and is, for example, 4396 Km.

The trade-in scheduled time is the time when the customer is actually planning to change trains, and the date from the present to the future is input. If you enter a date that is earlier than the current date, processing cannot be performed. When the current date, for example, December 1996 is input, the current trade-in assessment price of the current vehicle is calculated.

The assessment category specifies whether the current assessment is a real assessment or a provisional assessment. The actual assessment is a full-scale assessment that is performed in detail by inputting the current vehicle status in detail. In this regard, the provisional assessment is an assessment performed in order to obtain an approximate assessment value (a trade-in assessment price calculated based on a model year) by inputting only necessary conditions with the situation of the current vehicle. As described above, in the case of super-multi-running, this assessment cannot be selected and a provisional assessment is automatically made. The assessor is not a required input item and is for clarifying who the dealer (dealer) was in charge of. When the necessary items are input in this way, the input of the customer information and the selection of the vehicle type are completed as shown in FIG.

After inputting customer information and selecting a vehicle type in step 1, it is determined in step 2 whether input of essential information required for assessing the current vehicle has been completed. That is, in step 2, the first year registration date, which is the basic data necessary for assessing the current vehicle,
It is determined whether or not the input of the vehicle inspection expiration date, manufacturer / displacement, vehicle type / type, current vehicle mileage, and trade-in assessment time has been completed. If these data are not input, the next processing is not performed. Of these input basic data, the expiration date of the vehicle inspection and the displacement are not essential input items, and the process can be continued without data input.

If it is determined in step 2 that the input of the essential information necessary for assessing the current vehicle has been completed, in step 3, the release period is specified based on the selection of the manufacturer / displacement and the vehicle type input in step 1 ( Year). This release period is specified as follows: If the same model as the current car has undergone a full model change in the same year, both the car before the full model change and the car after the full model change are released at the same time This is performed when the release period cannot be specified automatically. For example, the Toyota Crown Sedan, which was released in December 1995, has been released since January 1995.
Due to a full model change in February,
Just because the first year registration was done on December 8,
Whether the current car was released between January 1995 and November 1995, that is, the car before the full model change,
It is unknown whether the car was newly released in December, that is, a car after a full model change. Therefore, in the case of the Toyota Crown Sedan, which was registered for the first year on December 8, 1995, as shown in Fig. 7, a message that a full model change was performed in December 1995, Is the car before full model change released between January, 1995 and November, 1995?
It is also necessary to select and enter whether or not the car has been fully remodeled and newly released in February. Therefore, if the current vehicle is, for example, a vehicle released between January 1995 and November 1995 and is a vehicle before a full model change, the user inputs that fact. Therefore, if a full model change has not been performed, the operation of step 3 is omitted and the release period is automatically specified.

When the release period of the current vehicle is specified in step 3 (specification of the year model), in step 4 the manufacturer / displacement and vehicle type selected in step 1 released in the release period specified in step 3 The grades for the types are listed as shown in FIG. Toyota Crown Sedan 3 released between January 1995 and November 1995
As shown in FIG. 8, there are four grades of 000CC vehicles. Therefore, from among the four grades displayed in the list, in step 5, the grade of the current car is
For example, R saloon G is selected.

When the grade of the current vehicle is selected in step 5, the current vehicle is checked in step 6. That is, in Step 6, Step 1 and Step 3
The main specifications of the vehicle type selected based on the information of the current vehicle selected in step 5 are displayed as shown in FIG. The main specifications are a manufacturer (for example, Toyota), a vehicle type (for example, crown and sedan), a release period (for example, January 7 to November 7), and a displacement (for example, 30).
00cc), engine type (for example, DOHC), fuel supply device (for example, EFI), drive device (for example, 2W)
D), number of doors (for example, 4 doors), grade (for example,
R saloon G), format (for example, E-JZS135),
Capacity (for example, 5 people), mission (for example, 4A; floor 4-speed automatic), new car price (for example, 4,0)
30,000 yen) (there are also superchargers and roof shapes). In step 6, the main specifications of the current vehicle are confirmed. If there are no mistakes in the main specifications of the current vehicle, in step 7, the process proceeds to selection of the body color of the current vehicle. That is,
In step 7, a list of body colors used for the same vehicle type as the current vehicle selected in step 5 is displayed as shown in FIG. 1995 with the selected grade
As shown in Fig. 10, there are six types of Toyota Crown Sedan 3000CC cars released from Mon to November 1995.

When a list of the body colors used for the same vehicle type as the current vehicle is displayed in step 7, a body color (for example, silver metallic) of the current vehicle is selected from the various body colors displayed in the list in step 8. Select and enter Even if the car is the same model type and grade, the degree of popularity varies depending on the body color, the demand is high for popular body colors and the demand is low for unpopular body colors, etc. This has had a significant impact on sales in the market. For this reason, the difference in the body color appears as a difference in the assessment price such that the assessment price is high for the popular body color and the assessment price is low for the unpopular body color.

When the body color of the current vehicle is selected and input in step 8, the current state of the exterior of the current vehicle is input in step 9. Fig. 11
As shown in the table, there are four items: whether there is a repair history, whether or not the vehicle is a modified vehicle, whether or not all paint is required, whether or not there is a complete paint history, and whether or not the vehicle is currently an accident. The presence or absence of a repair history means that if the exterior has been damaged and repaired before, it has been repaired, and if no exterior damage has occurred, there is no repair history. For modified cars,
In principle, it is not a remodeled car. If it is, it is necessary to input whether the remodeling is a dress-up remodeling or an illegal remodeling. Regarding all paint, whether the exterior damage is so severe that it is necessary to repaint, and whether or not there is all paint history, if there is this paint history, the original color all paint (same as new car It is either a complete repainting with colors) or a full color change painting (repainting all with a different color than the new car). In addition, regarding the current accident vehicle, the exterior of the current vehicle has caused an accident (for example, bumped and has a dent), and the damaged part is left as it is, or the damaged state immediately after the accident occurred This is a severe case. These restoration history, illegal remodeling, all painting required, and current accident are all negative factors in the assessment. In addition, in principle, in the case of a severe accident vehicle with a history of severe repair and a severe current accident, this assessment cannot be made and a provisional assessment is made. Thus, in the case of a severe accident car with a history of severe repair,
It is based on the low probability of buying and selling in the used car market.

When the current state of the exterior of the current vehicle is input in step 9, it is determined in step 10 whether or not necessary information on the current state of the exterior has been input.
That is, in step 9, the presence / absence of a repair history, the presence / absence of remodeling, the necessity of all paintings, and the presence / absence of a current accident are inputted. The repair / repair history as shown in FIG. 11 is input. Input items for repair / repair history include bumper status, fender status, apron status, door status, mirror status, electric mirror status, step status, bonnet status, roof status, and trunk status. Lid status, trunk floor status, inner panel left status, inner panel right status, radiator cell status, whether room cleaning has been completed,
There are repair marks on the seat, repair marks on the door lining, repair marks on the ceiling, and repair marks on the carpet.
For each item that has been repaired / repaired, enter one of the following damage histories: mild scratch, severe scratch, mild dent, severe dent, mild corrosion, severe corrosion, and replacement history. I do. Except for no evaluation (no repair / repair history), any of these input items for repair / repair history can be a negative factor in assessment depending on the degree of damage in the repair / repair history.

When the repair / repair history is input in step 11, it is determined in step 12 whether or not all the items of the repair / repair history are input as shown in FIG. If it is determined in step 12 that the input has been made for all the items of the repair / repair history as shown in FIG. 12, in step 13, the current state of the exterior relation as shown in FIG. 13 is inputted. Current input items related to exterior include bumper status, fender status,
Apron status, door status, mirror status, electric mirror status, step status, bonnet status, roof status, trunk lid status, trunk floor status, inner panel left status, inner panel right , The state of the radiator cell, the availability of the tire, the necessity of glass replacement, the state of the head lamp, and the state of the tail combination lamp. For each item, one of the damage states of minor scratch, severe scratch, mild dent, severe dent, mild corrosion, severe corrosion, or requiring replacement is input. All of these exterior-related input items, except for no evaluation (no damage), are negative factors in the assessment.

When the exterior-related current state input is performed in step 13, it is determined in step 14 whether or not all the items relating to the exterior-related current state input as shown in FIG. 13 have been input. If it is determined in step 14 that the input has been made for all items of the exterior-related current state input as shown in FIG. 13, in step 15, the current state of the interior of the current vehicle is input. As shown in FIG. 14, the input of the current state of the interior is the indoor condition, the trunk room condition,
There are four items: smell of cigarettes and pets, and damage to the dashboard. The condition of the room depends on whether there is any problem with the condition of the room, and if there is a problem, the condition of the problem is related to dirt in the room, damage to seats, damage to door lining, damage to ceiling, damage to carpet Check about. In other words, enter whether there is no dirt in the room, no damage to the sheet, no damage to the door lining, no damage to the ceiling, no damage to the carpet, etc. I do. The condition of the trunk room is based on whether there is no problem in the condition of the trunk room, the smell of cigarettes and pets is a problem of whether or not the smell of cigarettes and pets is in the cabin. The problem is whether the board is damaged or not. These input items for interior decoration are negative factors in the assessment, except that there is no problem.

When the current state of the interior is input in step 15, it is determined in step 16 whether or not all the items of the current state of the interior as shown in FIG. 14 have been input. If it is determined in step 16 that the input has been performed for all the items of the current state input of the interior as shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 15, the current input of the electrical components is air conditioner, battery, clock, power window left front, power window left rear, power window right front,
There are nine items on the right side of the power window, wiper related, and meter panel. For each of these, whether normal use is possible, that is, whether the normal use of the air conditioner is possible, whether the battery can be used normally or needs to be replaced, whether the watch can be used normally or needs to be replaced, Normal use or inoperable repair required before the left of the power window; normal use or inoperable repair required after the left of the power window; normal use or inoperable repair required before the right of the power window; power An input is made as to whether normal use right behind the window is possible or inoperable, whether the wiper-related normal use is possible or needs to be replaced, and whether the normal use of the instrument panel is possible. The current input items of these electrical components are negative factors in the assessment, except that they can be used normally.

When the current status of the electrical components is input in step 17, it is determined in step 18 whether or not all the items of the current status of the electrical components as shown in FIG. 15 have been input. If it is determined in step 18 that the input has been made for all the items of the current state of the electrical components as shown in FIG. 15, in step 19, the current state of the engine and underbody of the current vehicle is input. As shown in FIG. 16, the current input of the engine / underbody is eight items of engine, transmission, power transmission, steering, suspension, brake, muffler, and other engine / underbody.
For these, an input is made as to whether all of them can be used normally or not.

[0045] These ordinary input items of the engine and undercarriage are all negative factors in the assessment when normal use is difficult.

When the current state of the engine / underbody is input in step 19, it is determined in step 20 whether or not all the items of the current state of the engine / underbody as shown in FIG. 16 have been input. If it is determined in step 20 that the input has been made for all the items of the current input of the engine and underbody as shown in FIG. 16, in step 21, the current input of the equipment for the current vehicle is input. As shown in FIGS. 17 and 18, the current input of the equipment is a stereo component / CD, television, navigation, air purifier, aluminum wheel, spoiler, airbag, 4W.
There are 10 items: S, ABS, tools, and jacks. Regarding these, whether they are standard equipment or optional equipment,
Enter whether the usage status is available or not. Except for stereo components and CDs, there is no standard equipment.
Navigation, air purifiers, aluminum wheels, spoilers, airbags, 4WS, ABS are optional extras. Tools and jacks are usually equipped. The standard stereo components and CDs are standard when available and are "None"
If it is “unusable”, it will be a negative factor in the assessment. TV, navigation, air purifier, aluminum wheel, spoiler, airbag, 4W
As for S and ABS, if additional equipment is installed as an option (OP), it will be a positive factor in the assessment. OP-A, OP
-B and OP-C indicate the grades of options, respectively, OP-A has the highest assessed amount, OP-B and O-C
The PC and the assessed amount will go down. The assessment amounts for these optional equipment also differ depending on whether they are usable. If it is impossible to use it, simply removing the optional equipment will not return to the specifications of the new car at the time, which is rather a negative factor in the assessment. It is natural that tools and jacks are provided. If there are not enough tools, or if there are no tools and jacks, it will be a negative factor in the assessment. In addition, if a particularly expensive tool or jack is optional, the situation may be a positive factor in the assessment.

When the input of the current status of the equipment is completed, the input of all the information necessary for the assessment of the current vehicle is completed. Therefore, when the current state of the equipment is input in step 21, it is determined in step 22 whether or not all the items of the current state of the equipment as shown in FIGS. 17 and 18 have been input. In this step 22, FIG.
7. When it is determined that the input has been made for all the items of the current state of the equipment as shown in FIG. This operation is
This is performed by pressing the assessment button.
As shown in FIG. 5, the buttons may be composed of five buttons, for example, a standard assessment, a + 10% assessment of the standard assessment, a + 5% assessment of the standard assessment, a -5% assessment of the standard assessment, Can be a -10% assessment of the standard assessment. This assessment button is effective when leaving room for the discretion of the assessor, and allows the final assessment amount to be adjusted according to the negotiation process. This assessment adjustment range is not limited to 5% and 10%, but is 7% and 15%.
It can be set freely even at 0% and 20%. As described above, the calculation is started by pressing the assessment button (for example, pressing of the standard assessment), and when the computation is completed, in step 24, the calculation result is determined as the confirmed trade-in value, and the estimated value at the scheduled trade-in time is calculated. It is displayed as shown in FIG. The display of this final trade-in assessment includes:
The assessment date (for example, December 16, 1996), the confirmed trade-in assessment (for example, $ 2,160,510), and the expiration date (for example, until December 30, 1996) are displayed simultaneously.

In step 24, when the confirmed trade-in assessment amount at the current vehicle trade-in scheduled time is displayed, step 2
In 5, it is determined whether or not to display detailed assessment information on the confirmed trade-in assessment amount. If it is determined in this step 25 that the detailed assessment information on the confirmed trade-in assessment amount is to be displayed, in step 26,
23 is displayed. The display of the detailed assessment information is the amount of each item entered for the current state of exterior, the amount of each item entered for the current state of interior, the amount of each item entered for the current state of electrical components, The respective amounts for each item entered for the current status of the institution and undercarriage,
These are the respective amounts of money for each item entered regarding the current state of the equipment, and the mileage evaluation value based on the mileage of the current vehicle mileage with respect to the reference mileage. In the case of this embodiment, while the current vehicle mileage is 4,396 km, the reference mileage is 11,
At 050 km, the current car for this reference mileage is 6,
The traveling distance is 654 km shorter, and the traveling distance evaluation for the 6,654 km shorter traveling is $ 73,194. Further, the valuation value of the vehicle inspection residue is $ 161,000 when the vehicle inspection residue is 23 months. The evaluation value of the mileage and the evaluation value of the remaining vehicle inspection are positive factors in the assessment. Accordingly, the value obtained by subtracting the mileage evaluation for the small running and the valuation amount remaining for the 23 months after the vehicle inspection, $ 1,926,316, is the valuation value of the vehicle body.

If it is determined in step 25 that detailed assessment information on the confirmed trade-in assessment is not to be displayed, it is determined in step 27 whether a transfer assessment is to be performed. The transfer assessment is performed by changing the originally scheduled trade-in time, and in step 27, it is determined whether the planned trade-in time (December 1996) designated in the present embodiment is changed. It is. This step 2
If it is determined in step 7 that transfer assessment is not to be performed, this flow ends. If it is determined in step 27 that transfer assessment is to be performed, in step 28, an input of a transfer scheduled time (for example, February 1997) that is different from the originally input trade-in scheduled time (December 1996) is input. Do. In this step 28, if the trade-in scheduled time is changed and a different scheduled transfer date is entered, step 29
, A simulation assessment of the desired transfer time is displayed as shown in FIG. The estimated mileage of the transfer request in February 1997 in the simulation of the desired transfer time is calculated based on the total mileage of the current vehicle from the first year registration date of the current year to the present. If the total travel distance as of December 1996 is 4,396 Km, the predicted travel distance as of February 1997 is 5,128 Km. Based on the predicted mileage at the desired transfer time and the model year, the trade-in valuation of the desired transfer time is estimated to be $ 2,095,118, and the difference from the initial trade-in valuation is $ 65,392. Become. In this step 29, when the simulation assessment of the desired transfer time is completed, in step 30,
It is determined whether or not to perform a transfer assessment. This step 30
If it is determined that the transfer assessment is not performed again, the flow is terminated. If it is determined in step 30 that the transfer assessment is to be performed again, in step 31 the transfer schedule time (for example, 1998) which is different from the once changed transfer assessment time (February 1997).
Month). When the transfer scheduled time (for example, February 1998) is input again in step 31, in step 32, the estimated estimated amount of the current vehicle for the initially set transfer scheduled date and the currently set transfer scheduled date are evaluated. It is determined whether or not to display the predicted amount. If it is determined in step 32 that the estimated estimated value of the current vehicle for the scheduled transfer date initially set and the estimated estimated value of the scheduled transfer date (planned trade-in time) set this time are displayed in comparison,
In step 33, the estimated estimated amount of the current vehicle for the scheduled transfer date set first is displayed in comparison with the estimated estimated amount for the scheduled transfer date set this time, and the difference is displayed. When the display is made in step 33, the process returns to step 30, and it is determined again whether or not to perform the transfer assessment.

If it is determined in step 32 that the estimated estimated amount of the current vehicle for the scheduled transfer date initially set and the estimated estimated amount for the scheduled transfer date set this time are not displayed, the process proceeds to step 34. As shown in Fig. 25, the estimated value of the current vehicle in the scheduled transfer date set last time is compared with the estimated value of the newly set transfer (scheduled trade-in) date and time, and the difference is displayed. To display a simulation assessment of the desired transfer time. The predicted mileage of the transfer desired time in February 1998 in the simulation evaluation of the desired transfer time as shown in FIG. 25 is calculated based on the total mileage of the current vehicle from the first year registration date to the present. The distance traveled by February 1998 is predicted. If the total travel distance as of December 1996 is 4,396 km, the predicted travel distance at February 1998 is 9,520 km. Based on the predicted mileage and the year model at the changed desired transfer time, the trade-in valuation amount of the desired transfer time is calculated to be $ 1,665,041, and the difference between the trade-in valuation amount of February 1997 and the difference is calculated. $ 430,077 is displayed. When the simulation assessment of the desired transfer time is displayed in step 33, the process returns to step 30 to determine again whether or not to perform the transfer assessment. When the transfer assessment is performed again in step 30, the same processing as the processing in steps 31 to 34 is performed, and when it is determined in step 30 that the transfer assessment is not performed again, this flow ends.

Therefore, according to the present embodiment, the date of registration of the first year of the current vehicle brought by the user and the date of expiration of the vehicle inspection are input, the manufacturer name, the vehicle type are selected, and the displacement is input. , Specify the mission, grade and body color of the current vehicle, determine the scheduled trade-in time, determine the basic assessment price for the scheduled trade-in time, It is possible to easily and easily calculate an appropriate dealer assessment price at a scheduled trade-in time in a short time by correcting the actual travel distance based on the mileage at the planned trade-in time predicted from the above.

FIG. 26 shows a basic configuration of an embodiment of a used vehicle evaluation / evaluation processing apparatus for realizing the used vehicle evaluation / evaluation processing method according to the present invention. In the figure, 30 is a CPU, 31 is a ROM, 32 is a RAM,
33 is an I / O, 34 is an input device, 35 is a display,
A bus line 36 connects each device. CPU 20
0 is a non-volatile memory, which is I / O
The drive is performed based on an input signal input via the input device 203. By operating the input device 204, necessary data is read out from the ROM 201 and displayed on the display 205.
M202 and the data in ROM 201 and RA
A necessary operation is performed from the data in M202.

The ROM 201 stores various data in advance. The ROM 201 includes: a) the name of an existing passenger car maker; b) the type of vehicle currently released by each maker and the type of vehicle released in the past; c) Model of each model and type of each manufacturer d) Grade, engine, model, drive, number of doors, supercharger, capacity, etc. for each model and type of each manufacturer
Roof shape e) Vehicle models currently released by each manufacturer and new vehicle prices for vehicle types released within the last 7 years f) Body colors for each vehicle model and type of each manufacturer g) Currently released by each manufacturer Basic assessment price of the main unit based only on the vehicle model and the vehicle type and the model based on the body color released in the past. H) The standard mileage for each vehicle type currently released by each manufacturer and the vehicle type released in the past i) Each vehicle type Addition amount per unit distance for small traveling and deduction amount per unit distance for over traveling for each type j) Current input item of exterior k) Input item of repair / repair history l) Current input item of exterior related m ) Current input items of interior n) Current input items of electrical equipment o) Current input items of engine and undercarriage p) Current input items of equipment q) Assessment adjustment range are stored. The RAM 202 is a volatile memory that has a function of storing data input from the input device 204 and storing a result calculated based on the data input from the input device 204, and is configured to be rewritable. The I / O 203 includes the input device 204 and the CPU 20
This is an interface for connecting to 0.

The input device 204 is used to write data and to transfer data stored in the ROM 201 to the CPU 20.
0, causing the CPU 200 to execute a program, and causing the CPU 200 to perform arithmetic processing based on the written data,
This is an input device for writing the result of the arithmetic processing by the CPU 200 into the RAM 202. This input device 204
There are a method of inputting a key with a keyboard, and a method of moving a cursor with a mouse and selecting and inputting from a screen display item.
Further, the input device 204 has a method using a reading scanner in which necessary items are entered. In the case of this reading scanner, there is a method in which the vehicle verification is read by the reading scanner. This method of reading the vehicle verification is performed by scanning the vehicle with a scanner, and then performing the verification of the vehicle to obtain the name and address of the customer, the type of the assessment target (for example, E-JZS).
135), registration number (for example, Nerima 33, about 830)
4), body number (for example, 88888), displacement (for example, 3000 cc), mission (for example, automatic), driving device (for example, 2WD), registration date of the first year (for example, December 8, 1995) ) Is read. In the case of a reading scanner, it is also possible to use a specially-made assessment document, mark sheet or the like in addition to vehicle verification. The display 205 is a display device that displays data read from the ROM 201 and displays the result of the arithmetic processing performed by the CPU 200. Bus line 20
Reference numeral 6 denotes a connection line that connects the CPU 200 and the ROM 201, the CPU 200 and the RAM 202, and the CPU 200 and the I / O 203.

This computer system can be constituted by an office computer or a personal computer. In this case, all manufacturers, all vehicle types released by the manufacturer in the past, all grades of all vehicle types released in the past, standard assessment value based on the period of use and popularity from the first year registration date to the present, Data such as basic traveling data of the vehicle from the date of registration in the first year to the present will be stored in the ROM 201, but since these data change according to the social situation (for example, fashion), Periodic correction is required, and this correction involves rewriting data in the ROM 201. In this case, the side that provides data to the user of the computer system exchanges the ROM 201 or the like.

Further, this computer system is used by all domestic and foreign manufacturers, all types of models released by the manufacturers in the past, all grades of all types of vehicles released in the past, and the period of use from the first year registration date to the present. The host computer has all the data of the vehicle that changes according to the social situation, such as the standard assessment amount based on the degree of popularity, the basic driving data of the vehicle from the date of registration in the first year to the present, and the like. It is also possible to attach a terminal to a person who uses, and connect by run. In this case, a person who uses these data can read the data stored in the host computer as needed by operating the terminal, and can evaluate the current vehicle. By providing the necessary data in the host computer, the data can be changed according to the social situation and rewritten regularly (for example, monthly). Will be able to easily obtain the latest assessment standards.

In the system configured as described above,
When the system is started up, an input screen for customer information is displayed on the display 205 as shown in FIG. The input of the customer information is for specifying the seller / buyer, the assessment class, the scheduled trade-in time (for example, December 1996), and the person in charge of the assessment (for example, Kazumasa Dosodo). The input is performed by the RAM 204
02 is stored. Next, the input device 204 is operated to read out the manufacturer names (Toyota, Nissan, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, etc.) stored in the ROM 201 in advance, and display them on the display 205 as a list. By operating the input device 204 from among the listed manufacturer names, the manufacturer name of the current vehicle (for example, Toyota) is selected.
When a manufacturer is selected, an initial (e.g., K) of the vehicle type of the manufacturer is selected, and the operation of the CPU 200 causes the initial (K) of the vehicle type selected from among the vehicle types previously stored in the ROM 201 to be selected. Vehicle type (Crown 4-door hardtop, Crown sedan,
Cresta Sedan and Gran Via Wagon) are listed on the display 205. The input device 204 selects the current vehicle type (for example, crown / sedan) from the vehicle types displayed in the list.

When the type of the current vehicle is selected, the CPU 2
The vehicle type selected on the display 205 by the drive of 00 is displayed as shown in FIG. Display 20
In the customer information input screen as shown in FIG. 6, which is displayed in FIG. 5, the input device 204 inputs the first year registration date (current vehicle registration date), registration number, and vehicle inspection end date. Date (end date of the current vehicle inspection), body number, mission (automatic or manual), A / C presence, S / R presence, meter status, and current vehicle mileage. The first year registration date and the vehicle inspection end date are input by the input device 204. For example, the first year registration: December 8, 1995, the vehicle inspection end date: Heisei 1
When the user inputs "December 7, 0", the year of the current vehicle and the remaining period of the vehicle inspection (23 months) are determined.

Further, the input device 204 performs the assessment classification (actual assessment or provisional assessment) and the assessment staff (for example, Kazumasa Dosato) which identifies the person in charge of the assessment.

[0060] Manufacturer / displacement and vehicle type of current car are selected (for example, Toyota, Crown, Sedan, 3000CC)
Then, when the first year registration date is specified, the release period (year type) stored in the ROM 201 in advance for the same type of car is specified. Toyota Crown Sedan 3000CC registered for the first year on December 8, 1995 has undergone a full model change in December 1995,
As shown in FIG. 7, a message that the full model change was performed in December 1995 is specified, and the model year of the current vehicle is specified, for example, from January 1995 to November 1995. The specified current vehicle year is stored in the RAM 202.

When the manufacturer / displacement, vehicle type, and year of the current vehicle are specified, for the same vehicle type as the current vehicle,
The engine, model, drive, number of doors, supercharger, capacity, and roof shape are listed on the display 205 as shown in FIG. The same grade (for example, R saloon G) as that of the current vehicle is selected from the various grades as shown in FIG.
4 and the grade selected by the input device 204.

When the manufacturer / displacement, vehicle type, first year registration date, mission, and grade of the current vehicle are selected in this manner, the CPU 205 operates to display the main specifications of the current vehicle (manufacturer, The vehicle type, release period, displacement, engine type, fuel supply device, supercharger, drive device, number of doors, roof shape, grade, model, capacity, mission, new vehicle price, and classification are displayed as shown in Fig. 9. I do.

When the main data of the current vehicle as shown in FIG. 9 displayed on the display 205 is confirmed and an input of the confirmation is made by the input device 204, the CPU 200 operates and as shown in FIG. A list of various body colors at the time when it was released as a car type car is displayed. This figure 1
Input device 204 of the body color (for example, silver metallic) of the current car from among the body colors of the Toyota Crown Sedan released in January 1994 shown in FIG.
Select and input by. Then, the basic body assessment price stored in the ROM 201 in advance is determined for the same manufacturer, vehicle type, year, and grade.

When the body color of the current vehicle is selected and input,
When the CPU 200 is driven and the current state input of the exterior as shown in FIG.
Reads and displays whether the vehicle is a remodeled vehicle, whether all paintings are required, and if there is a history of all paintings, whether it is the original color painting or the color change painting, or the current accident vehicle. The information is displayed on the input device 205 and necessary items are input by the input device 204. When the current state of the exterior is input, the CPU 200 is driven,
Input of repair / repair history stored in the ROM 201 in advance as shown in FIG. 12 (bumper status, fender status, apron status, door status, etc., room cleaning not completed, seat door lining, ceiling) -The presence or absence of a repair mark on the carpet is read out and displayed on the display 205, and necessary items are input by the input device 204.
When the repair / repair history is input, the CPU 200 is driven,
The exterior-related current state inputs (bumper state, fender state, apron state, door state, mirror state, etc.) as shown in FIG. 13 which are stored in the ROM 201 in advance.
Is read out and displayed on the display 205, and necessary items are input by the input device 204. When a current state input related to the exterior is input, the CPU 200 is driven and the ROM
As shown in FIG. 14, the current input of the interior (four items of indoor conditions, trunk room conditions, smell of cigarettes and pets, and damage to the dashboard) stored in advance in FIG. The necessary items are input by the device 204. When the input of the current state of the interior is performed, the CPU 200 is driven to read the current state input (whether the air conditioner, the battery, the clock, the power window, etc. can be used) of the electrical component as shown in FIG. The information is displayed on the input device 205 and necessary items are input by the input device 204. When the input of the current state input of the electrical component is performed, the CPU 200 is driven and the ROM 200 is driven.
The current input of the engine / underbody (the engine, transmission, power transmission device, steering, suspension, brake, muffler, and other eight items of engine / underbody) as shown in FIG. The information is displayed on the input device 205 and necessary items are input by the input device 204. When the input of the current input of the engine and underbody is performed, the CPU 200 is driven, and the current input of the equipment (stereo component CD, television, navigation, air) as shown in FIGS. 10 items of the purifier, the aluminum wheel, the spoiler, the air bag, the 4WS, the ABS, the tool, and the jack) are read out and displayed on the display 205, and the input device 2 is displayed.
04 is used to input necessary items.

Then, an assessment button (switch on the display 205, the input device 204)
Input), the CPU 200 is driven and the RAM
An assessment operation is performed based on the various data stored in 202. For example, as shown in FIG.
It consists of two buttons, the standard assessment and the standard assessment +
A 10% assessment, a + 5% assessment of the standard assessment, a -5% assessment of the standard assessment, and a -10% assessment of the standard assessment are set.

As described above, the calculation is started by pressing the evaluation button (for example, pressing the standard evaluation), and when the calculation is completed, the calculation result is determined as a fixed trade-in evaluation amount as shown in FIG. The predicted assessment is displayed on display 205. The display of the confirmed trade-in assessment value includes the assessment date (for example, December 16, 1996).
Day), final trade-in assessment (eg, $ 2,160,51
0) and the expiration date (for example, until December 30, 1996) are displayed at the same time. For the confirmed trade-in assessment amount displayed on the display 205, as shown in FIGS. 21 to 25, details of the assessment of the current vehicle at the scheduled trade-in time are displayed on the display 205 (display of assessment detail information). Can also be.

The mileage evaluation is based on the assumption that a vehicle has its own average mileage for each type of vehicle. If the current vehicle travels less than this average mileage, the vehicle should be less damaged. If the current car is overrunning with respect to the running distance, the car should be damaged much. Therefore, an attempt is made to make a difference in the assessed value depending on whether the car is running a little or many times.

FIGS. 27 to 47 show another embodiment of the processing method of trade-in prediction estimation of used car and the processing apparatus of trade-in prediction estimation of used car according to the present invention. The method of processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention is processed by a computer, and FIGS. 27 to 32 show another embodiment of the processing method of trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention. Is shown in the flowchart of the evaluation process showing the mode of the evaluation. In the figure, the processing from step 40 to step 48 is the same as that in FIG.
Are the same as Steps 1 to 9 shown in FIG. In the present embodiment, the scheduled trade-in time is set to February 1997.

In step 48, the current state of the exterior is input,
That is, with regard to whether or not the vehicle has been repaired, whether or not the vehicle is a remodeled vehicle is input as no remodeling, no painting is required, and the vehicle is currently an accident. When the current state of the exterior of the current vehicle is input in this step 48 as shown in FIG. 33, it is determined in step 49 whether the current state of the exterior of the current vehicle has no repair history. If it is input in step 48 that the current condition of the exterior of the current vehicle is not without repair history (there is a repair history), in step 50, the status of the repair history is input as shown in FIG. That is, as input locations of the repair history, the front right (heavy), front (OK), front left (OK), floor panel (OK), right side (medium), left side (OK), trunk floor (OK), right Rear (OK), rear (OK), left rear (O
K) and the roof (OK) are input. The middle right front and right side
The degree of repair is shown, and OK indicates no repair. In step 50, although it is determined in step 49 that there is a repair history in the current exterior condition of the current vehicle,
In the case where the process is continued without inputting the status of the repair history as shown in FIG. 34, the assessment is not the final assessment and the provisional assessment or the assessment is impossible.

When the status of the repair history of the current vehicle is input in step 50, it is determined in step 51 whether a repair history location has been input. In this step 51, since it is input in step 48 that there is a repair history, it is necessary to input at least one or more repair histories, and it is necessary to input at least one or more repair histories. wait.

If it is determined in step 51 that the input of the repair history has been completed, or if it is determined in step 49 that there is no repair history, it is determined in step 52 whether or not the current vehicle is not an accident vehicle. Currently, an accident vehicle means that the exterior of the current car has caused an accident (for example, bumped and has a dent) and the damaged part is left as it is, or the damaged state immediately after the accident occurred This is a severe case. If it is determined in step 48 that the current condition of the exterior is the accident vehicle, the current condition of the accident location of the current vehicle is input in step 53 as shown in FIG. That is, as the input location of the accident location in step 53,
K), front (OK), front left (OK), floor panel (O
K), right side (OK), left side (OK), trunk floor (severe), right rear (medium), rear (severe), left rear (medium), roof (OK), frame & first member Exchange,
Enter the correction (Yes). The middle of the rear right and the rear left and the severity of the trunk floor and rear indicate the severity of the accident.
Indicates no restoration.

In step 53, when the situation of the current accident location of the current vehicle is input, in step 54,
It is determined whether or not the input of the current accident location has been completed. In step 54, since it is determined in step 52 that the vehicle is a current accident vehicle, it is necessary to input at least one or more current accident sites, and waits for the input of the current accident site. In step 53, although it is determined in step 52 that the vehicle is the current accident vehicle, FIG.
When the process is continued without inputting the status of the restoration history as shown in FIG. 5, the assessment is not the final assessment but the temporary assessment or the assessment is impossible.

If it is determined in step 54 that the current accident location has been input, or if it is determined in step 52 that the current vehicle is not currently an accident vehicle, step 55
, The repair / repair history is input as shown in FIG. Repair / repair history includes bumper condition (none), fender condition (none), apron condition (none), door condition (none), mirror condition (none), electric mirror condition (none), Step condition (none), bonnet condition (none), roof condition (none), trunk lid condition (none), trunk floor condition (none), inner panel left condition (none), inner panel Right state (none), radiator cell state (none), room cleaning (finished), sheet repair marks (none), door lining repair marks (none), ceiling repair marks (none), carpet repair marks Enter (none). For each item, if there is a history of repair / repair, one of the following: minor scratch, severe scratch, mild dent, severe dent, slight corrosion, severe corrosion, replacement history Enter the degree of damage. These items for repair / repair history are not evaluated (no repair / repair history)
Other than the above, all can be negative factors in the assessment depending on the degree of damage in the repair / repair history.

When the repair / repair history is input in step 55, it is determined in step 56 whether or not all the items regarding the repair / repair history input as shown in FIG. 36 have been input. If it is determined in this step 56 that the input has been made for all items of the repair / repair history as shown in FIG. The current state of exterior related items is bumper status (rear: ×), fender status (rear right: ×), apron status (rear: D), door status (no error), mirror status (no error), electric Mirror status (no error), step status (no error),
Bonnet condition (C), roof condition (no abnormality),
Trunk lid condition (x), trunk floor condition (D), inner panel left condition (no abnormalities), inner panel right condition (no abnormalities), radiator cell condition (no abnormalities), use of tires (Rear left / right / right / left:
No abnormalities, spare: none), necessity of glass replacement (front, front left and right doors, front right and left doors: unnecessary, rear: necessary), head lamp status (no abnormality), tail and combination lamp status (replacement required) Enter For each item, mild scratch (A), severe scratch (B), mild dent (C), severe dent (D), mild corrosion (E), severe corrosion (F),
Enter any of the damaged states that require replacement (x) using symbols. All of these exterior-related input items, except for no evaluation (no damage), are negative factors in the assessment.

When the current state of exterior-related items is input in step 57, it is determined in step 58 whether all items relating to the current state of exterior-related inputs as shown in FIG. 37 have been input. If it is determined in step 58 that the input has been made for all items of the exterior-related current state input as shown in FIG. 37, it is determined in step 59 whether there is no problem with the indoor condition.

If it is determined in step 59 that there is a problem in the indoor condition, in step 60, as shown in FIG. 38, the indoor condition is determined as follows: the interior is dirty, the sheet is damaged, the door lining is not damaged, and the ceiling is not damaged. Enter no damage to the carpet and no damage to the carpet. When the indoor condition is input in step 60, the process waits in step 61 for the input of the problem location of the indoor condition to be completed. If it is determined in step 61 that the input of the problem location of the indoor situation has been completed, or if it is determined in step 59 that there is no problem in the indoor situation, step 6 is performed.
In FIG. 38, as shown in FIG. 38, there is a problem in the state of the trunk room, there is a problem of the smell of a cigarette / pet in the room (the smell of the room), and an input is made without damaging the dashboard. When various items are input in step 62, in step 63, the status of the trunk room,
It is determined whether or not the input of the current state of the interior relating to the smell of the cigarette / pet and the damage to the dashboard has been performed, and waits for completion of the input of the current state of the interior regarding the situation of the trunk room, the smell of the tobacco / pet, and the damage to the dashboard. .
If it is determined in step 63 that the input of the current state of the interior has been completed, in step 64, the current state of the electrical components as shown in FIG. 39 is input. In other words, the current status of electrical components is as follows: air conditioner (normal use), battery (normal use), clock (normal use), left front of power window (normal use), rear left of power window (normal use) Enter), right front of power window (normal use), right rear of power window (normal use), wiper relation (normal use), and meter panel (normal use). The current input items of these electrical components are negative factors in the assessment, except that they can be used normally.

When the current status of the electrical components is input in step 64, it is determined in step 65 whether or not all the items regarding the current status input of the electrical components as shown in FIG. 39 have been input. If it is determined in this step 65 that the input has been made for all the items of the current state of the electrical components as shown in FIG. 39, the current state of the engine and underbody of the current vehicle is input in a step 66. As shown in FIG. 40, the input of the current state of the engine / underbody is that the engine, transmission, power transmission device, steering, suspension, brake, muffler, and other eight items of engine / underbody can be normally used.

[0078] These ordinary input items of the institution and underbody are all negative factors in the assessment when it is difficult to use them normally.

When the current state of the engine / underbody is input in step 66, it is determined in step 67 whether all the items of the current state of the engine / underbody as shown in FIG. 40 have been input. If it is determined in this step 67 that all the items of the current input of the engine and underbody as shown in FIG.

As shown in FIG. 41 and FIG. 42, the stereo equipment CD (standard and usable),
TV (none), navigation (none), air purifier (none), aluminum wheels (none), spoiler (none), airbag (none), 4WS (none), ABS
Enter (none), tool, jack (usable). For TV, navigation, air purifier, aluminum wheel, spoiler, airbag, 4WS, and ABS, if they are additionally provided as an option (OP), they are positive factors in the assessment. OP-A, OP-B and OP-C indicate optional grades, respectively.
Has the highest appraisal value, and the appraisal value of OP-B and OP-C decreases. For these optional equipment,
The assessed amount differs depending on whether it is usable. If it is impossible to use it, simply removing the optional equipment will not return to the specifications of the new car at the time, which is rather a negative factor in the assessment. It is natural that tools and jacks are provided. If there are not enough tools, or if there are no tools and jacks, it will be a negative factor in the assessment.

When the current state of the equipment is input in step 68, it is determined in step 69 whether or not all the items of the current state of the equipment as shown in FIGS. 41 and 42 have been input.

If it is determined in step 69 that the input has been made for all the items of the current state of the equipment as shown in FIGS. 41 and 42, various reductions and actual repair costs as shown in FIG. 43 are input in step 70. For various reductions and actual repair costs, enter the amount of the write-down of the part that was evaluated for reduction or repair in the assessment. For exteriors, the cost is -200,000 yen with a history of severe repair, and -200,000 yen for a more severe accident vehicle.
Regarding the interior, due to the indoor condition (dirt in the room / damage of the seat), -35,000 yen, damage to the trunk room,
Input -50,000 yen and -25,000 yen for indoor smell (cigarettes and pets). The other items are not subject to reduction, so the amounts have not been inserted. It should be noted that the illegal remodeling reduction in the case of illegal remodeling (when the current vehicle is entered as an illegally remodeled vehicle in step 48)
And a reduction in the case where the entire vehicle is required (in the case where it is entered in step 48 that the current vehicle requires the entire vehicle), a predetermined reduction (for example, a uniform 200,000 yen for an illegally modified vehicle). In the case where a reduction in the total amount of paint is required, a uniform reduction of 200,000 yen is displayed. However, in the present embodiment, both items are not reduced. Also, exterior bumper status, fender status, apron status, door status, mirror status, electric mirror status, step status, bonnet status, roof status, trunk lid status, trunk floor status State, inner panel left state,
The state of the right side of the inner panel, the state of the radiator cell, the use of the tire, the necessity of glass replacement, the state of the headlamp, and the state of the tail and combination lamp are set in advance according to the degree of the state. Although the reduction is displayed, it is not a target of reduction in this embodiment.

Further, for the air conditioner, battery, clock, power window, and wiper related to the electrical components, a preset reduction is displayed, and for the meter panel, the reduction input by the assessor at the time of the assessment is displayed. In the embodiment, the amount is not reduced. In addition, engines, transmissions, power transmission devices, steering, suspension, brakes,
For the muffler and other institution / undercarriage, the amount entered by the assessor at the time of the assessment is displayed as a reduction as it is, but is not subject to the reduction in the present embodiment. Furthermore, stereo components, CDs, televisions, navigation, air purifiers, aluminum wheels,
For spoilers, airbags, 4WS, ABS, tools, and jacks, the amount entered by the assessor at the time of assessment is displayed as a reduction as it is, but is not subject to reduction in the present embodiment.

In inputting the various reductions and actual repair costs, in the present embodiment, a reduction 200,000 yen based on the presence of a severe repair history when it is determined in step 41 that there is a repair history, A reduction of 200,000 yen based on the severe current accident vehicle when it is determined to be a car, and a reduction of 35,000 yen when there is a problem in the indoor situation in step 54, for example, when it is determined that the interior is dirty and the seat is damaged. In step 49, a reduction of 50,000 due to damage to the trunk room
In step 49, a 25,000 yen reduction due to indoor smell is input.

Although not evaluated in the present embodiment, various reductions and actual repair costs include an increase due to the availability of a television, an increase due to the availability of a navigation, and air. Increased due to availability when equipped with a purifier, increased due to availability when equipped with aluminum wheels, increased due to availability when equipped with a spoiler, increased due to availability when equipped with an airbag, equipped with 4WS It is also possible to perform an evaluation assessment of increasing the amount depending on the availability in the case where the operation is performed, and increasing the amount depending on the availability in the case where the ABS is equipped.

When various reductions and actual repair costs are entered in step 70, an evaluation value for the current vehicle is calculated in step 71. This calculation is performed by pressing the assessment button. The assessment button is composed of five buttons as shown in FIG.
0% assessment, + 5% assessment of standard assessment, -5% assessment of standard assessment, and -10% assessment of standard assessment. This assessment button leaves room for the discretion of the assessor to adjust the final assessment amount according to the negotiation process. This assessment adjustment range is 5%
Not only 10% but also 7%, 15%, 10% and 20% can be set freely.

The calculation is started by pressing the assessment button (for example, pressing of the standard assessment) in this way, and when the computation is completed, in step 72, the calculation result is determined as the confirmed trade-in assessment amount at the scheduled trade-in time. The assessed value is displayed as shown in FIG. The display of the confirmed trade-in assessment value includes the assessment date (for example, December 16, 1996).
Day), final trade-in assessment (for example, $ 1,271,11
8), the expiration date (for example, until December 30, 1996) is displayed at the same time.

When the calculation result (standard assessment) is displayed as the confirmed trade-in assessment ($ 1,271,118) in step 72, whether or not to display assessment detailed information on the firm trade-in assessment in step 73 Is determined. If it is determined in step 73 that the detailed assessment information on the confirmed trade-in assessment amount is to be displayed, then in step 74, the assessment detailed information shown in FIGS. 45 to 47 is displayed. The display of the detailed assessment information shows the amount of each item entered for the current condition of the exterior, the amount of each item entered for the current condition of the interior,
The amount of money for each item entered for the current status of electrical equipment, the amount of money for each item entered for the current status of engines and undercarriage, the amount of money for each item entered for the current condition of equipment, and standards Each of the mileage evaluation values based on the mileage of the current vehicle mileage with respect to the mileage. That is, the reduction evaluation for the exterior is determined by the bumper (−50,00
0), fender (-50,000), apron (-2
5,000), hood (-20,000), trunk (-75,000), tire (-8,000), glass (-80,000), tail combination lamp (-2)
000), repair history (-200,000), current accident vehicle (-200,000). In addition, the doors, mirrors, electric mirrors, steps, roofs, inner panels, headlamps, modified cars, and all painting required are rated 0 (no reduction). The reduction in interior-related items was evaluated based on the indoor conditions (-25,000), damage to the trunk room (-50,000), indoor odors (-25,000).
0). In addition, the dashboard is rated 0 (no reduction). The air conditioners, batteries, clocks, power windows, wipers, and meter panels related to the electrical components are all evaluated 0 (no reduction). In addition, repair of engines and underbody engines, repair of missions, repair of power transmission devices, repair of steering, etc.
The evaluations of replacement of the suspension, repair of the brake, repair of the muffler, and other repairs of the engine are all 0 (no reduction). Equipment related stereo component C
D, television, navigation, air purifiers, aluminum wheels, spoilers, airbags, 4WS, ABS, tools, and jacks all have a rating of 0 (no reduction).

Further, the total mileage of the current vehicle is 4,396K.
m, the total mileage of the current vehicle up to the scheduled trade-in time (February 1997) is predicted to be 5,128 Km. The standard mileage of the current vehicle in February 1997 was 12,95.
At 0 km, the current vehicle for this reference mileage is 7,82.
The traveling distance is 2 km shorter, and the traveling distance evaluation for the 7,822 km shorter traveling is $ 86,042. In addition, the valuation value of the vehicle inspection residue is $ 14 if the vehicle inspection residue is 21 months remaining.
7,000. The evaluation value of the mileage and the evaluation value of the remaining vehicle inspection are positive factors in the assessment. Accordingly, the value obtained by subtracting the mileage evaluation for the small running and the valuation amount remaining for 21 months from the vehicle inspection, $ 1,038,076, is the valuation value of the vehicle body.

If it is determined in step 73 that detailed assessment information on the confirmed trade-in assessment is not to be displayed, it is determined in step 75 whether transfer assessment is to be performed. If it is determined in this step 75 that the transfer assessment is not to be performed, this flow ends. If it is determined in step 75 that transfer assessment is to be performed, in step 76, an input of a transfer scheduled time (for example, February 1998) that is different from the originally entered trade-in scheduled time (February 1997) is input. Do. This step 76
In, when the scheduled trade-in time is changed and a different scheduled transfer date (February 1998) is entered, in step 77, a simulation assessment of the desired transfer time is displayed as shown in FIG. The estimated mileage of the desired transfer time in February 1998 in the simulation of the desired transfer time is calculated based on the total mileage from the date of registration of the current vehicle in the first year to the present time. If the total mileage as of December 1996 is 4,396 km, the predicted mileage as of February 1997 is 5,128 km, and
The predicted mileage at the time of the month is 9,520 km. Based on the estimated mileage and the year model at the desired transfer time (February 1998), the trade-in assessment of the desired transfer time is $ 952,444.
The difference from the initial (February 1997) trade-in assessment is $ 318,674. In this step 77, when the simulation evaluation of the desired transfer time is completed, the process returns to step 75, and it is determined whether the transfer evaluation is performed again. If the transfer assessment is not performed again, this flow ends. When it is determined in step 75 that the transfer assessment is to be performed again, in step 76, the transfer assessment time that has been changed once (Heisei 1
If the user inputs a transfer scheduled time (for example, August 1998) different from that of February 1998, the process proceeds to step 77 in FIG.
The simulation evaluation of the desired transfer time is displayed as shown in FIG. That is, the predicted mileage of the new transfer request time in August 1998 is 11,716 km, and the trade-in assessment value of the desired transfer time is estimated to be $ 773,428.
The difference from the trade-in valuation in February is $ 497,690.

In this step 77, when the simulation evaluation of the desired transfer time is completed, the flow returns to step 75, and it is determined again whether or not to perform the transfer evaluation. If you do not want to perform another transfer assessment, terminate this flow,
When performing the transfer assessment again, the same processing as described above is performed.

Therefore, according to the present embodiment, the user inputs the date of registration of the first year of the current vehicle brought in by the user and the date of expiration of the vehicle inspection, selects the manufacturer name, the vehicle type, and inputs the displacement. , Specify the mission, grade and body color of the current vehicle, determine the scheduled trade-in time, determine the basic assessment price for the scheduled trade-in time, Corrected by the mileage actual amount based on the mileage at the scheduled trade-in time predicted from
Anyone can easily calculate the dealer's assessment price at the appropriate scheduled trade-in time in a short time.

The contents of these assessments are shown in RA shown in FIG.
It can be stored in M202, and the evaluation result of the current vehicle is stored. By storing the assessment result of the current vehicle in the RAM 202 in this way, when the current vehicle is assessed again at intervals of time (period), it can be compared with the previous assessment contents.

FIGS. 50 to 63 show another embodiment of the processing method of trade-in prediction estimation of a used car and the processing apparatus of trade-in prediction evaluation of a used car according to the present invention. The processing method of the trade-in prediction assessment of the used car and the processing apparatus of the trade-in prediction assessment of the used car in the present embodiment, when the transfer is scheduled to be performed at a specific time, how much the trade-in amount of the current vehicle is scheduled to be changed. Predicted assessment will be made to compare with the current trade-in assessment of the current car and use it as a reference when transferring.
The processing method of trade-in prediction estimation of a used car according to the present invention is processed by a computer. FIGS. 50 to 53 show an embodiment of the processing method of trade-in prediction estimation of a used car according to the present invention. Is shown.

In the figure, steps 80 to 10
The processes up to 1 are the same as steps 1 to 22 shown in FIGS. In the present embodiment,
As shown in FIG. 54, a desired transfer time is input in place of the scheduled trade-in time, the desired transfer time is set in February 1997, and the current vehicle mileage is 13,467.
Km is set. If you want to know the current confirmed trade-in assessment of the current car, you can find it by setting the desired transfer time in December 1996.

In step 101, FIGS.
When it is determined that the input has been made for all the items of the current state of the equipment as shown in (1), in step 102, the estimated trade-in amount for the desired transfer time is calculated. When this calculation is performed, in step 103, a simulation assessment of the desired transfer time is displayed. If the desired transfer time is set to December 1996, the confirmed trade-in assessment amount of the current vehicle (December 1996) as shown in FIG. 55 is displayed. The total mileage of the current vehicle at the transfer request time in December 1996 in the simulation assessment of the desired transfer time is 13,467 Km, and the reference mileage is 11,05.
The vehicle travels 2,417 km longer than 0 km, and the mileage evaluation value is reduced by $ 36,255. The value of the trade-in assessment as of December 1996 is $ 2,051,061. When the desired transfer time is set in February 1997, FIG.
The estimated trade-in value of the current vehicle at the desired transfer time is displayed as shown in FIG. The total mileage of the current car at the time of the transfer request in February 1997 in the simulation assessment of the desired transfer time in February 1997 was estimated based on the total mileage of 13,467 km as of December 1996. The total mileage in February 1997 was estimated to be 15,711 Km.
The vehicle traveled 2,761 km more than 50 km, and the mileage evaluation value was reduced by $ 41,415. The value of the trade-in assessment in February 1997 was $ 1,986,229.

When the desired transfer time is set to February 1998 as shown in FIG. 57, the estimated trade-in assessment amount of the current vehicle at the desired transfer time is displayed as shown in FIG. The total mileage of the current vehicle at the time of the transfer request in February 1998 in the simulation assessment of the desired transfer time in February 1998 is the total mileage 1 as of December 1996.
29,175K based on 3,467Km
m, which is estimated to be 4,825 km longer than the current vehicle mileage of 24,350 km in February 1998, and the mileage evaluation value is reduced by $ 72,375. In December 1998, the vehicle inspection was 9 months remaining, the value of the vehicle inspection remaining evaluation was increased by $ 63,000, and the trade-in assessment as of February 1998 was $ 1,
597, 237.

When the estimated trade-in assessment of the desired transfer time is displayed in step 103, step 10
At 4, it is determined whether or not a comparison is made between the estimated trade-in amount at the desired transfer time and the current confirmed trade-in amount. If it is determined in step 104 that the estimated trade-in amount of the desired transfer time is to be compared with the current confirmed trade-in value, in step 105, the expected trade-in amount of the desired transfer time and the current confirmed trade-in value are determined. Make a comparison.
If the desired transfer time is set to December 1996 (present), an error occurs because comparison is not possible. Therefore, the comparison with the current confirmed trade-in assessment amount is limited only when the desired transfer time is set to a future date from the present (December 1996), and as shown in FIG. In the case of setting in February, 1998, as shown in FIG. 59, a comparison is made between the confirmed trade-in valuation amount of the current vehicle as of December 1996 and the predicted trade-in valuation amount at the desired transfer time in February 1997. . Compared with the current car and the desired transfer time, the trade-in assessment in February 1997 ($ 1,986,22
Contrary to 9), the current assessed value of the current car is reduced by $ 36,255 in the mileage evaluation value and $ 161, in the vehicle inspection remaining evaluation value.
000 increased trade-in assessment ($ 2,051,06
1), and it is displayed that the current trade-in assessment is $ 64,832 higher than the desired transfer time in February 1997. When the desired transfer time is set to February 1998 as shown in FIG. 57, as shown in FIG. 60, the final trade-in assessment value of the current vehicle as of December 1996 and the February 1998 Compare with the estimated trade-in assessment at the desired transfer time. The comparison between the current vehicle and the desired transfer time is based on the trade-in assessment in February 1998 (￥
1,597,237), the current assessed value of the current car is
The trade-in assessment ($ 36,255) has been reduced by the mileage evaluation value and the $ 161,000 has been increased by the vehicle inspection residual evaluation value ($
2,051,061), and the difference is $ 4 for the current trade-in assessment from the desired transfer time in February 1998.
It is displayed that 53,824 will also be high.

If it is determined in step 104 that the estimated trade-in amount of the desired transfer time is not compared with the current confirmed trade-in amount, in step 106, it is determined whether or not the desired transfer time is changed. Change of the desired transfer time is the originally planned transfer time (February 1997)
To make a trade-in assessment at another desired transfer time. If it is determined in step 106 that the change of the desired transfer time is not to be performed, the flow ends. If it is determined in step 106 that the desired transfer time is to be changed, then in step 107,
A transfer scheduled time (for example, February 1998) different from the originally desired transfer time (February 1997) is input.
In this step 107, when the desired transfer time is changed and a different desired transfer date is inputted, in step 108, the estimated trade-in assessment at the changed desired transfer time is calculated. When this operation is performed, step 10
At 9, a simulation assessment of the desired transfer time after the change is displayed. When the desired transfer time is changed from February 1997 to February 1998, the estimated trade-in assessment amount of the current vehicle at the desired transfer time in February 1998 is displayed as shown in FIG. When the predicted trade-in assessment value at the changed desired transfer time is displayed in step 109, the predicted trade-in value at the changed desired transfer time is compared with the current confirmed trade-in value at step 110. Determine whether or not. If it is determined in step 110 that the estimated trade-in amount of the changed desired transfer time is to be compared with the current confirmed trade-in amount, in step 111, the predicted trade-in amount of the changed desired transfer time is compared with the current estimated trade-in amount. Figure 60 shows the comparison with the final trade-in assessment
Perform as shown in

If it is determined in step 110 that the estimated trade-in amount for the desired transfer time after the change is not to be compared with the current confirmed trade-in amount, step 112
In the above, it is determined whether or not a comparison is made between the predicted trade-in valuation amount of the desired transfer time after the change and the predicted trade-in valuation amount of the desired transfer time before the change. If it is determined in step 112 that the predicted trade-in valuation amount of the desired transfer time after the change is not compared with the predicted trade-in valuation amount of the desired transfer time before the change, the process returns to step 106 to change the desired transfer time (the Heisei era). It is determined whether or not to change (February, 2010) to another desired transfer time (for example, December, 1998).
If it is determined in step 106 that the desired transfer time is not changed, the flow ends. If it is determined in step 106 that the change of the desired transfer time is to be performed, the processing from step 107 to step 111 is performed again, and a simulation assessment of the desired transfer time after the change is performed again as shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 62, a comparison is made between the estimated trade-in assessed value at the desired transfer time after the change again and the current confirmed trade-in assessed value. If it is determined in step 112 that the predicted trade-in assessed value of the desired transfer time after the change is to be compared with the predicted trade-in assessed value of the desired transfer time before the change, in step 113, as shown in FIG. A comparison is made between the estimated trade-in amount for the timing and the estimated trade-in amount for the desired transfer time before the change. In comparison of the desired transfer time after the change and the desired transfer time before the change, the trade-in assessment amount in February 1998 of the changed transfer time ($ 1,597,23)
7) is compared with the trade-in assessment (¥ 1,981,661) in February 1997 of the desired transfer time before the change, and the difference is the estimated trade-in assessment of the desired transfer time in February 1998. Thus, it is displayed that the estimated trade-in assessment amount of the desired transfer time in February 1997 is higher by $ 384,424. When the estimated trade-in value of the desired transfer time after the change is compared with the predicted trade-in value of the desired transfer time before the change in step 113, the flow ends.

Therefore, according to the present embodiment, when the user wants to know the estimated value of the current vehicle at the desired transfer time, he / she inputs the date of registration of the current vehicle in the first year and the date of expiration of the vehicle inspection. Select the manufacturer name, vehicle type, enter the displacement, specify the mission, grade, body color of the current car, specify the desired transfer time, determine the basic assessment price of the desired transfer time, and decide it The basic assessment price is corrected by the mileage actual value based on the predicted mileage at the desired transfer time predicted from the current mileage data of the current vehicle and the valuation value of the vehicle inspection remaining by the remaining period of vehicle inspection, so that anyone can easily and quickly Can calculate the predicted assessment price at the appropriate desired transfer time, and can calculate the predicted assessment price at the desired transfer time after the change when the desired transfer time is changed. Comparison of the predicted assessment price in the hope transfer period after the change and the predicted assessment price in the desired transfer time, it is possible to make a comparison between the predicted assessment price and the current of the defined trade-in assessment amount in the desired transfer time.

These processes are performed in the RAM 2 shown in FIG.
02, and the predicted assessment result at the desired transfer time of the current vehicle is stored. Thus, the RAM 20
By storing the predicted assessment result at the desired transfer time of the current vehicle in 2, when the current vehicle is assessed again at intervals of time (period), it can be compared with the previous assessment contents.

FIGS. 64 to 76 show still another embodiment of the processing method of trade-in prediction estimation of used car and the processing apparatus of trade-in prediction estimation of used car according to the present invention. The processing method of the trade-in prediction assessment of a used car according to the present invention is performed by a computer.
1 shows a trade-in prediction assessment processing flowchart showing an embodiment of a method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

In the figure, steps 120 to 15
The processing up to 0 is performed in Steps 40 to 40 shown in FIGS.
Similar to step 70. In the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 70, a desired transfer time is inputted instead of the scheduled trade-in time, and the desired transfer time is set in February 1997. The current vehicle mileage is 13,
467 Km is set. Current car (12/1996
In order to calculate the trade-in amount of the month, the user may enter December 1996 as the desired transfer time.

When various reductions and actual repair costs are input in step 150, in step 151, the estimated trade-in evaluation amount at the desired transfer time of the current vehicle is calculated. This calculation is performed by pressing the assessment button. The assessment button can be composed of five buttons as shown in FIG. 19, where the standard assessment is + 10% of the standard assessment and + 5% of the standard assessment. Assessment, -5% of standard assessment
Assessment can be distinguished from the -10% assessment of the standard assessment. This assessment button leaves room for the discretion of the assessor to adjust the final assessment amount according to the negotiation process. This assessment adjustment range is not limited to 5% and 10%,
% And 20% can be freely set.

As described above, the computation is started by pressing the assessment button (for example, pressing the standard assessment button). When the computation is completed, in step 152, the simulation assessment of the desired transfer time is displayed. When the desired transfer time is set to December 1996, the current trade-in assessment of the current vehicle is displayed as shown in FIG. The total mileage of the current vehicle at the time of the transfer request in December 1996 in the simulation assessment of the desired transfer time was 13,4.
67km, 2,4 from the standard mileage of 11,050km
17km multi-travel, $ 36,25 in mileage evaluation
5 is reduced, but the vehicle inspection expiration date is December 1998 and the vehicle inspection is 23 months remaining, and the vehicle inspection remaining evaluation value is $ 161,000
Has been increased, and bumper (-50,000), fender (-50,000),
Apron (-25,000), Bonnet (-20,0)
00), trunk (-75,000), tires (-8,
000), glass (-80,000), tail combination lamp (-20,000), repair history (-200,0)
00), there is a current accident vehicle (-200,000).
0), damage to the trunk room (-50,000), and indoor odor (-25,000). Combining these, the trade-in assessment as of December 1996 was $ 1,243,
061. When the desired transfer time is set to February 1997, the estimated trade-in assessment of the current vehicle at the desired transfer time is displayed as shown in FIG. The total mileage of the current car at the time of the transfer request in February 1997 in the simulation assessment of the desired transfer time in February 1997 was estimated based on the total mileage of 13,467 km as of December 1996. The total mileage in February 1997 was 1
It is estimated to be 5,711 km, which is 2,761 km longer than the standard car mileage of 12,950 km in February 1997, and the mileage evaluation value is reduced by $ 41,415. Inspection was 21 in December 1998
In the remaining month, the vehicle inspection residual evaluation value $ 147,000 has been increased,
Combined with the reduction assessment for the exterior and the reduction for the interior, the trade-in assessment in February 1997
1,143,661.

If the estimated trade-in assessment amount of the desired transfer time is displayed in step 152, step 15
At 3, it is determined whether or not a comparison is made between the estimated trade-in amount at the desired transfer time and the current confirmed trade-in amount. If it is determined in step 153 that the estimated trade-in amount of the desired transfer time is to be compared with the current confirmed trade-in value, in step 154, the estimated trade-in amount of the desired transfer time and the current confirmed trade-in value are determined. Make a comparison.
If the desired transfer time is set to December 1996 (present), an error occurs because comparison is not possible. Therefore, the comparison with the current confirmed trade-in assessment amount is limited only when the desired transfer time is set to a future date from the present (December 1996), and the desired transfer time is set as shown in FIG. In the case of setting in February 1997, as shown in FIG. 73, a comparison is made between the confirmed trade-in assessed value of the current vehicle as of December 1996 and the predicted trade-in assessed value at the desired transfer time in February 1997. . In comparison with the current car and the desired transfer time, the trade-in assessment in February 1997 ($ 1,143,66
In contrast to 1), the current assessed value of the current vehicle is reduced by $ 36,255 in the mileage evaluation value and $ 161, in the vehicle inspection remaining evaluation value.
000 increased trade-in assessment ($ 1,243,06
1), and it is displayed that the difference is higher by $ 99,400 in the current trade-in assessment than the desired transfer time in February 1997.

If it is determined in step 153 that the estimated trade-in amount for the desired transfer time is not to be compared with the current confirmed trade-in value, it is determined in step 155 whether or not the desired transfer time is to be changed. Change of the desired transfer time is the originally planned transfer time (February 1997)
To make a trade-in assessment at another desired transfer time. If it is determined in step 155 that the desired transfer time is not changed, the flow ends. If it is determined in step 155 that the change of the desired transfer time is to be performed, the process proceeds to step 156.
A transfer scheduled time (for example, February 1998) different from the originally desired transfer time (February 1997) is input.
In step 156, when the desired transfer time is changed and a different desired transfer date (February 1998) is input, in step 157, the expected trade-in assessment at the changed desired transfer time (February 1998) is performed. Calculate the amount. When this calculation is performed, in step 158, a simulation assessment of the desired transfer time after the change is displayed. When the desired transfer time is changed from February 1997 to February 1998, the estimated trade-in assessment amount of the current vehicle at the desired transfer time in February 1998 is displayed as shown in FIG. The total mileage of the current vehicle at the time of the transfer request in February 1998 in the simulation assessment of the desired transfer time in February 1998 was predicted based on the total mileage of 13,467 km as of December 1996. The thing, Heisei 10
The total mileage in February 1998 was estimated to be 29,175 Km.
4,825 km more than 4,350 km, the running distance evaluation value is reduced by $ 72,375, but the vehicle inspection expiration date is December 1998, the vehicle inspection is 9 months remaining, the vehicle inspection remaining evaluation value is $ 63 The total value of the trade-in assessment in February 1998 is $ 754,669.

In step 158, the estimated trade-in assessment at the changed desired transfer time is displayed. In step 159, the predicted trade-in assessment at the changed desired transfer timing is compared with the current confirmed trade-in assessment. Is determined. If it is determined in step 159 that the expected trade-in assessment value of the changed desired transfer time is to be compared with the current confirmed trade-in assessment value, in step 160, the predicted trade-in assessed value of the changed desired transfer time is compared with the current estimated trade-in value. The comparison with the confirmed trade-in assessment is performed as shown in FIG.

If it is determined in step 159 that comparison between the estimated trade-in estimated value of the desired transfer time after the change and the current confirmed trade-in estimated price is not performed, step 161 is performed.
In the above, it is determined whether or not a comparison is made between the predicted trade-in valuation amount of the desired transfer time after the change and the predicted trade-in valuation amount of the desired transfer time before the change. If it is determined in step 161 that the predicted trade-in assessment value of the desired transfer time after the change is not compared with the predicted trade-in assessment amount of the desired transfer time before the change, the process returns to step 155, and the desired transfer time after the change (Heisei It is determined whether or not to change (February, 2010) to another desired transfer time (for example, December, 1998).
If it is determined in step 155 that the change of the desired transfer time is not to be performed, the flow ends. If it is determined in step 155 that the desired transfer time is to be changed, the processing from step 156 to step 160 is performed again, and a simulation assessment of the desired transfer time after the change is performed again as shown in FIG. 76. As shown in FIG. 77, a comparison is made between the estimated trade-in assessed value at the desired transfer time after the change again and the current confirmed trade-in assessed value.

If it is determined in step 161 that the estimated trade-in amount of the desired transfer time after the change is to be compared with the estimated trade-in amount of the desired transfer time before the change,
In step 162, as shown in FIG. 78, the estimated trade-in amount of the desired transfer time after the change is compared with the predicted trade-in amount of the desired transfer time before the change, and the difference is displayed. In comparison of the desired transfer time after the change with the desired transfer time before the change, the desired transfer time before the change is compared with the trade-in assessment (¥ 754,669) in February 1998 of the changed transfer time. The estimated value of the trade-in in February 1997 ($ 1,143,661) was compared with the estimated value of the trade-in estimated in February 1998, The estimated trade-in assessment of ￥
It is displayed that 388,992 is also higher. As described above, when the predicted trade-in assessment value of the desired transfer time after the change is compared with the predicted trade-in assessment amount of the desired transfer time before the change in step 162, the flow ends.

Therefore, according to the present embodiment, if the user wants to know the estimated value of the current vehicle at the desired transfer time, he or she inputs the date of registration of the current vehicle in the first year and the date of expiration of the vehicle inspection. Select the manufacturer name, vehicle type, enter the displacement, specify the mission, grade, body color of the current car, specify the desired transfer time, determine the basic assessment price of the desired transfer time, and decide it The basic assessment price is corrected by the mileage actual value based on the predicted mileage at the desired transfer time predicted from the current mileage data of the current vehicle and the valuation value of the vehicle inspection remaining by the remaining period of vehicle inspection, so that anyone can easily and quickly Can calculate the predicted assessment price at the appropriate desired transfer time, and can calculate the predicted assessment price at the desired transfer time after the change when the desired transfer time is changed. Comparison of the predicted assessment price in the hope transfer period after the change and the predicted assessment price in the desired transfer time, it is possible to make a comparison between the predicted assessment price and the current of the defined trade-in assessment amount in the desired transfer time.

These processes are performed in the RAM 2 shown in FIG.
02, and the predicted assessment result at the desired transfer time of the current vehicle is stored. Thus, the RAM 20
By storing the predicted assessment result at the desired transfer time of the current vehicle in 2, when the current vehicle is assessed again at intervals of time (period), it can be compared with the previous assessment contents.

[0114]

According to the first aspect of the present invention, it is possible for anybody to easily and easily calculate a dealer assessment price at an appropriate assessment schedule time.

According to the invention described in claim 2 of the present application, even if the set scheduled assessment time is changed, anyone can easily and quickly calculate the appropriate dealer estimated price at the changed estimated scheduled time. be able to.

According to the invention as set forth in claim 3 of the present application, even if the once-scheduled assessment time is further changed, anyone can easily and quickly change the dealer assessment price at the appropriate changed assessment time. It can be calculated in comparison with the dealer's assessment price at the previous assessment schedule time.

According to the invention as set forth in claim 4 of the present application, the present assessment price of the vehicle to be assessed is compared with the assessment price at the desired transfer time of the assessment target vehicle, so that anyone can easily make a current transfer in a short time. It is possible to easily determine whether it is a good idea to switch to the specified transfer time.

According to the invention as set forth in claim 5 of the present application, even if another desired transfer time is specified from the set desired transfer time, the evaluation price of the initially specified desired transfer time can be easily and quickly determined by anyone. Is it better to compare with the assessed price at the desired transfer time after the change, and switch to the originally specified desired transfer time?
It is possible to easily determine whether it is better to change to the transfer time specified after the change.

According to the invention described in claim 6 of the present application, anyone can easily and quickly calculate an appropriate dealer assessment price in consideration of the current state of the exterior.

According to the invention as set forth in claim 7 of the present application, anyone can easily and quickly calculate an appropriate dealer assessment price in consideration of the current state of the interior.

According to the invention of claim 8 of the present application, anyone can easily and quickly calculate an appropriate dealer assessment price in consideration of the current state of electrical components.

According to the ninth aspect of the present invention, anyone can easily and quickly calculate an appropriate dealer assessment price in consideration of the current state of the engine and underbody.

According to the invention described in claim 10 of the present application, an appropriate dealer assessment price according to the present condition of the exterior, the present condition of the interior, the present condition of the electric components, the present condition of the engine and undercarriage can be easily and quickly set by anyone. Can be calculated.

According to the invention as set forth in claim 11 of the present application, it is possible to accurately grasp the current state of the exterior, reflect the situation accurately on the dealer's assessment price, and easily calculate the appropriate final assessment price for anyone. Can be.

According to the invention described in claim 12 of the present application, it is possible to accurately grasp the current state of the interior, appropriately reflect the present condition on the dealer's assessment price, and easily calculate the appropriate final assessment price for anyone in a short time. Can be.

According to the thirteenth aspect of the present invention, the current status of the electrical components is accurately grasped, and the current status of the electrical components is properly reflected in the dealer's assessment price, so that the appropriate final assessment price can be easily and quickly calculated by anyone. be able to.

According to the fourteenth aspect of the present invention, the current situation of the engine and undercarriage is accurately grasped, appropriately reflected in the dealer's assessment price, and the appropriate assessment price can be easily and quickly calculated by anyone. can do.

According to the invention of claim 15 of the present application, anyone can easily calculate the dealer assessment price at the appropriate assessment schedule time in a short time.

According to the invention as set forth in claim 16 of the present application, even if the set scheduled assessment time is changed, anyone can easily and quickly calculate the appropriate dealer estimated price at the changed estimated scheduled time. be able to.

According to the invention described in claim 17 of the present application, the current assessed price of the subject vehicle and the assessed price of the desired transfer time of the subject vehicle are compared, and any one can easily change the present location in a short time. It is possible to easily determine whether or not it is a good idea to switch to the specified transfer time.

According to the invention described in claim 18 of the present application, even if another desired transfer time is specified from the set desired transfer time, the estimated price of the initially specified desired transfer time can be easily and quickly determined by anyone. Compare with the assessed price of the desired transfer time after the change, so that it is easy to determine whether it is better to transfer to the originally specified desired transfer time or to change to the specified transfer time after the change be able to.

According to the invention described in claim 19 of the present application, by specifying the desired transfer time taking into account the current state of the exterior, the current state of the interior, the current state of the electrical components, and the current state of the engine and undercarriage, it is possible to specify the desired transfer time of the vehicle to be assessed. Determine the basic assessment price of the transfer time, and modify the determined basic assessment price with the actual mileage based on the mileage at the desired transfer time predicted from the current mileage data of the assessment target vehicle. Compare the current status of the exterior, the current status of the interior, the current status of the electrical components, the current status of the engine and undercarriage with the assessed price, and determine whether it is a good idea for anyone to easily transfer in a short time in a short time It is possible to easily determine whether it is a good idea to change at the changed transfer time.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is an assessment processing flowchart showing one embodiment of a processing method for a trade-in prediction assessment of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is an assessment processing flowchart showing one embodiment of a processing method of a trade-in prediction assessment of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 3 is an assessment processing flowchart showing one embodiment of a processing method for a trade-in prediction assessment of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 4 is an assessment processing flowchart showing one embodiment of a processing method of a trade-in prediction assessment of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 5 is an assessment processing flowchart showing one embodiment of a processing method of a trade-in prediction assessment of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing input of customer information and selection display of a vehicle type.

FIG. 7 is a selection display diagram of a model of the vehicle type selected in FIG. 6;

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a list of grades.

FIG. 9 is a view showing main specifications of a vehicle type selected based on information on a current vehicle.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a list of body colors.

FIG. 11 is a diagram for inputting the degree of damage in the history of repair / repair of the current vehicle.

FIG. 12 is a diagram for inputting the current state of the exterior.

FIG. 13 is a diagram for inputting the current state of exterior relations.

FIG. 14 is a diagram for inputting the current state of the interior.

FIG. 15 is a diagram for inputting the current state of electrical components.

FIG. 16 is a diagram for inputting the current state of the engine / undercarriage.

FIG. 17 is a diagram for inputting the current state of equipment.

FIG. 18 is a diagram for inputting the current state of equipment.

FIG. 19 is a diagram showing an assessment button.

FIG. 20 is a diagram showing a confirmed trade-in assessment amount.

FIG. 21 is a view showing detailed assessment information.

FIG. 22 is a diagram showing detailed assessment information.

FIG. 23 is a diagram showing detailed assessment information.

FIG. 24 is a diagram showing a simulation assessment of a desired transfer time.

FIG. 25 is a diagram showing a simulation evaluation of a desired transfer time when the desired transfer time is changed.

FIG. 26 is a basic block diagram showing an embodiment of a processing apparatus for predicting trade-in of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 27 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the processing method of trade-in prediction estimation of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 28 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the processing method of trade-in prediction assessment of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 29 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of a method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 30 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of a method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 31 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the processing method for trade-in prediction assessment of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 32 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 33 is a diagram in which the current state of the exterior is input.

FIG. 34 is a diagram for inputting the status of the repair history.

FIG. 35 is a diagram for inputting the current situation of the accident location of the current vehicle.

FIG. 36 is a diagram for inputting the degree of damage in the history of repair / repair of the current vehicle.

FIG. 37 is a diagram in which the current state of exterior relations is input.

FIG. 38 is a diagram in which the current state of the interior is input.

FIG. 39 is a diagram in which the current state of electrical components is input.

FIG. 40 is a diagram in which the current state of the engine / underbody is input.

FIG. 41 is a diagram in which the current state of equipment is input.

FIG. 42 is a diagram in which the current state of equipment is input.

43 is a diagram for inputting various reductions and actual repair costs. FIG.

FIG. 44 is a view showing a confirmed trade-in assessment amount.

FIG. 45 is a view showing detailed assessment information.

FIG. 46 is a view showing detailed assessment information.

FIG. 47 is a view showing detailed assessment information.

FIG. 48 is a diagram showing a simulation assessment of a desired transfer time when a transfer is initially requested.

FIG. 49 is a diagram showing a simulation evaluation of a desired transfer time after the change of the desired transfer time at which the initial transfer was desired.

FIG. 50 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 51 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the processing method for trade-in prediction assessment of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 52 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 53 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of a method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 54 is a view showing input of customer information and selection of a vehicle type.

FIG. 55 is a diagram showing a simulation evaluation of a desired transfer time at the desired transfer time for the vehicle type shown in FIG. 54;

FIG. 56 is a diagram showing a simulation evaluation of a desired transfer time after the change of the desired transfer time for the vehicle type shown in FIG. 54;

FIG. 57 is a diagram showing input of customer information and selection display of a vehicle type.

58 is a diagram showing a simulation assessment of a desired transfer time at the desired transfer time for the vehicle type shown in FIG. 57;

59 is a diagram comparing a predicted trade-in assessment value at the desired transfer time of the vehicle type shown in FIG. 52 with a current confirmed trade-in assessment value of the current vehicle.

60 is a diagram comparing a predicted trade-in assessment amount at the desired transfer time of the vehicle type shown in FIG. 57 with a current confirmed trade-in assessment value of the current vehicle.

FIG. 61 is a diagram showing a simulation evaluation of the desired transfer time at the changed desired transfer time when the desired transfer time is changed for the vehicle type shown in FIG. 57;

62 is a diagram in which, when the desired transfer time is changed for the vehicle type shown in FIG. 61, the estimated trade-in value at the changed desired transfer time and the current confirmed trade-in value of the current vehicle are compared.

63 is a diagram comparing a predicted trade-in assessment amount at the desired transfer timing before the change and a predicted trade-in assessment amount at the desired transfer timing after the change when the desired transfer time for the vehicle type shown in FIG. 54 is changed. .

FIG. 64 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of a method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 65 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 66 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 67 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 68 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 69 is an assessment processing flowchart showing another embodiment of the method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to the present invention.

FIG. 70 is a diagram showing input of customer information and selection of a vehicle type.

FIG. 71 is a diagram showing a simulation assessment of a desired transfer time when a transfer of the current vehicle to the current time is desired.

FIG. 72 is a diagram illustrating a simulation evaluation of a desired transfer time at a changed desired transfer time when the desired transfer time for the current vehicle is changed.

73 is a diagram comparing a predicted trade-in valuation amount at the desired transfer time shown in FIG. 72 with a current confirmed trade-in valuation amount of the current vehicle.

74 is a diagram showing a simulation evaluation of the desired transfer time at the changed desired transfer time when the desired transfer time is further changed from the desired transfer time shown in FIG. 72. FIG.

75 is a diagram in which a predicted trade-in valuation amount at the desired transfer time shown in FIG. 74 is compared with a current confirmed trade-in valuation amount of the current vehicle.

76 is a diagram showing a simulation evaluation of the desired transfer time at the changed desired transfer time when the desired transfer time is further changed from the desired transfer time shown in FIG. 74.

FIG. 77 is a diagram comparing a predicted trade-in valuation amount at the desired transfer time shown in FIG. 76 with a current confirmed trade-in valuation amount of the current vehicle.

FIG. 78 is a diagram comparing a predicted trade-in assessment amount when changing to the desired transfer time shown in FIG. 72 and a predicted trade-in assessment amount when changing to the desired transfer time shown in FIG. 74;

[Explanation of symbols]

200 ………………………………………… C
PU 201 …………………………………………… R
OM 202 ………………………………………… R
AM 203 ……………………………………… I
/ O 204 ............................................................ Input device 205 ........................ ...... Display 206 ...... ………………………………… Bus line

Claims (19)

[Claims] In conducting a trade-in assessment of a used car in the future,
Identify the date of registration and the expiration date of the vehicle inspection for the first year of the vehicle to be assessed, identify the manufacturer and the displacement of the vehicle to be assessed, identify the vehicle type and mission of the vehicle to be assessed, The vehicle to be assessed is identified by identifying the meter status and the mileage of the vehicle to be assessed.
The trade-in scheduled time of the subject vehicle is specified, and one or more of the same model as the subject vehicle sold at the time of registration of the first year stored in advance from the date of registration of the first year is stored in advance. A release period of the vehicle to be assessed is selected from two or more release periods, and a grade of the vehicle to be assessed is selected from grades stored in advance for the model vehicles in the release period, and the release date of the manufacturer is selected. The body color of the vehicle to be assessed is selected from the pre-stored body colors released as the vehicle type and the vehicle grade of the grade during the period, and the vehicle color is selected based on the vehicle type, grade and body color of the vehicle to be assessed. From the basic assessment price assessed according to the model year stored in advance, the basic assessment of the model at the specified scheduled trade-in time of the subject vehicle to be assessed. Particularly, based on the expected actual mileage at the scheduled trade-in time calculated on the basis of the current mileage of the vehicle to be assessed and the standard mileage at the scheduled trade-in time of the vehicle type, per 1 km The actual mileage amount based on the addition and subtraction amount of the vehicle is added, and the vehicle inspection remaining period additional amount based on the monthly added amount of the vehicle inspection period remaining at the scheduled trade-in time is added to determine the trade-in assessment price. Method of trade-in prediction assessment of used cars. 2. After calculating the trade-in assessment price at the originally scheduled trade-in time of the vehicle to be assessed, the date of the trade-in scheduled time is changed to a date of a different trade-in schedule and specified. , Based on the current mileage of the subject vehicle, the estimated actual trade-off time calculated based on the model year's basic assessment price based on the date of the subject vehicle Based on the difference between the mileage and the standard mileage at the scheduled trade-in time after the change of the vehicle type, the mileage actual amount based on the addition / subtraction amount per 1 km is added and remains at the changed planned trade-in time. The trade-in assessment price is determined by adding the surveillance remaining period addition amount based on the monthly sum of the inspection period and the trade-in assessment price at the originally designated trade-in scheduled time of the above assessment target vehicle And the trade-in assessment price at the scheduled trade-in time Compare and method of processing trade predictive assessment of used cars according to claim 1 which is to be displayed by calculating the difference. 3. After calculating the trade-in assessment price of the subject vehicle at the changed scheduled trade-in time, the date of the planned trade-in time is further changed to a different trade-in schedule date and specified. , Based on the current set mileage of the subject vehicle, based on the yearly base assessment price based on the date of the latest scheduled trade-in date of the subject vehicle Based on the expected actual mileage and the standard mileage at the latest scheduled trade-in time for the vehicle type, add the actual mileage based on the amount added / subtracted per km and set the latest trade-in schedule The trade-in assessment price is determined by adding the surveillance remaining period addition amount based on the monthly added amount of the car inspection period remaining at the timing, and the trade-in at the latest scheduled trade-in time of the above-mentioned assessment target vehicle Assessed price and last trade-in Trade assessment is compared with the price, the processing method of trade predictive assessment of used cars according to claim 1 which is to be displayed by calculating the difference in annual period. 4. In conducting a trade-in assessment of the transfer time of a used car, specify the date of registration and the expiration date of vehicle inspection for the first year of the subject vehicle, and determine the manufacturer and displacement of the subject vehicle. Identify the vehicle type and mission of the vehicle to be assessed, specify the status of the meter and the mileage of the vehicle to be assessed, identify the vehicle to be assessed, and select the desired transfer of the vehicle to be assessed. The time is specified, and one or more sales periods of one or more models of the same model as that of the vehicle to be assessed, which were sold at the time of the first year registration date, are stored in advance from the first year registration date. Selecting the release period of the vehicle to be assessed, selecting the grade of the vehicle to be assessed from the grades stored in advance for the model vehicles of the release period, and selecting the grade of the model in the release period of the manufacturer; The body color of the vehicle to be assessed is selected from the previously stored body colors released as the vehicle type of the grade, and the pre-stored body color selected based on the vehicle type, grade, and body color of the vehicle to be assessed is stored. Based on the current mileage of the subject vehicle and the standard mileage of the vehicle type, based on the current mileage of the subject vehicle and the standard mileage of the vehicle type, based on the basic assessment price of the subject vehicle from the basic assessment price assessed by the model year The current trade-in assessment price obtained by adding the actual mileage based on the amount added / subtracted per km and the vehicle inspection remaining period addition amount based on the monthly added amount of the currently remaining inspection period; The assessment is made from among the basic assessment prices assessed based on a pre-stored model year selected based on the type, grade and body color of the subject vehicle. The estimated actual mileage at the desired transfer time calculated based on the current mileage of the vehicle to be assessed based on the base yearly assessment price of the specified desired transfer time of the elephant car, and the desired transfer of the vehicle type The actual mileage based on the amount added / subtracted per km is added based on the standard mileage at the time, and the vehicle inspection remaining period is added based on the monthly added amount of the vehicle inspection period remaining at the desired transfer time. Compare the trade-in assessment price of the desired transfer time calculated by adding the amount, compare the current trade-in assessment price with the trade-in assessment price of the desired transfer time, calculate the difference and display it. Of the trade-in prediction assessment of used cars 5. After calculating a trade-in assessment price at the originally designated desired transfer time of the vehicle to be assessed, change the date of the desired transfer time to a different desired transfer time and specify the same. The estimated actual mileage of the desired transfer time after the change calculated based on the current mileage of the target vehicle and the base assessment price of the model based on the year and month of the desired transfer time after the change of the target vehicle, and 1 based on the distance and the standard mileage at the desired transfer time after the change of the vehicle type.
Add the actual mileage based on the addition / subtraction amount per km, and add the vehicle inspection remaining period additional amount based on the monthly addition amount of the vehicle inspection period remaining at the desired transfer time after the change,
In addition, the trade-in assessment price is determined by taking into account the repair / repair subtraction amount based on the presence / absence of repair / repair locations of the subject vehicle, and the calculated trade-in assessment price and the desired transfer time after the change 5. The processing method for predicting trade-in of a used car according to claim 4, wherein the price is compared with a trade-in evaluation price, and the difference is calculated and displayed. 6. When there is a change in the current condition of the exterior of the vehicle to be assessed, an addition / subtraction amount based on the current condition of the exterior is determined, and the addition / subtraction amount based on the current condition of the exterior is evaluated in consideration of the trade-in assessment price. 6. The processing method for predicting trade-in of a used car according to claim 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. 7. When there is a change in the current state of the interior of the vehicle to be assessed, an addition / subtraction amount based on the current state of the interior is determined, and the addition / subtraction amount based on the current state of the interior is evaluated in consideration of the trade-in assessment price. The processing method for predicting trade-in of a used car according to claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6. 8. When there is a change in the current status of the electrical components of the vehicle to be assessed, an addition / subtraction amount based on the current status of the electrical components is determined, and the addition / subtraction amount based on the current status of the electrical components is added to the trade-in assessment price. Claims 1,2,3,4,5 to be assessed
6. The processing method for trade-in prediction assessment of a used car according to 6 or 7. 9. When there is a change in the current state of the engine / underbody of the subject vehicle, an addition / subtraction amount based on the current state of the engine / underbody is determined, and the addition / subtraction amount based on the current state of the engine / underbody is traded in. The processing method for predicting a trade-in prediction of a used car according to claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8, wherein the evaluation is performed in consideration of the evaluation price. 10. When there is a change in the present condition of the exterior, the present condition of the interior, the present condition of the electric components, the present condition of the engine and undercarriage of the vehicle to be assessed, the addition / subtraction amount based on the present condition of the exterior, and the present condition of the interior are changed. Based on the current status of electrical components, and based on the current status of electrical components, and based on the current status of the engine and undercarriage. Addition / subtraction, institutions
Claim 1, 2, 2, wherein each of the addition and subtraction amounts based on the present condition of the undercarriage is assessed in consideration of the trade-in assessment price.
A method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to 3, 4, or 5. 11. The used vehicle according to claim 6, wherein the current condition of the exterior is any of a history of restoration, a status of remodeling, a necessity of all painting, and a current accident vehicle. How assessments are processed. 12. The present condition of the interior includes the presence or absence of a problem in the indoor condition, the presence or absence of a problem in the trunk room,
The method for processing a trade-in prediction of a used car according to claim 7, wherein the presence or absence of a pet smell problem or the dashboard breakage problem is determined. 13. The current status of the electrical components is: availability of air conditioner, availability of battery, availability of clock, availability of front left power window, availability of rear left power window, front right power window. Whether or not to use
13. The processing method for predicting trade-in of a used car according to claim 8, 10, 11 or 12, wherein the method is any one of availability of a right rear of a power window, availability of a wiper relationship, and availability of a meter panel. 14. The present condition of the engine / undercarriage is determined based on whether the engine is normally used, whether the mission is normally used,
Normal use of power transmission, normal use of steering, normal use of suspension, normal use of brakes, normal use of muffler, other normal use of engine and underbody 14. The processing method for trade-in prediction estimation of a used car according to claim 9, 10, 11, 11, 12 or 13, which is any of the use of the vehicle. 15. A manufacturer selecting means for selecting a manufacturer of a vehicle to be assessed from among a large number of manufacturers stored in advance, a date of registration of a vehicle to be assessed in a first year, a date of expiration of a vehicle inspection, and an exhaust gas. First year registration etc. input means for inputting the amount, the manufacturer selected by the manufacturer selecting means, and the first year registration date and displacement input by the first year registration etc. input means are stored in advance. Vehicle type selection means for selecting the vehicle type of the vehicle to be assessed from among the vehicle types of the manufacturer released on the date of registration for the first year, and the mileage for inputting the current total mileage of the vehicle to be assessed The input means, the scheduled trade-in time specifying means for inputting the scheduled trade-in time of the assessment target vehicle, and the vehicle type of the assessment target vehicle selected by the vehicle type selection means are recorded in advance. A grade selecting means for selecting a grade of the vehicle to be assessed from among a plurality of grades existing in the car type remembered, and a first year registration date inputted by the first year registration etc. input means, which are stored in advance. A release period selecting means for selecting a release period of the vehicle to be assessed from one or more release periods of a model of the same model as the vehicle to be assessed that was sold at the time of registration of the first year; A body color selecting means for selecting a body color of the assessment target vehicle from a plurality of body colors stored in advance based on the release period selected by the release period selection means; a vehicle type of the assessment target vehicle;
Select a basic assessment price of the model year of the subject vehicle from among a plurality of pre-stored basic assessment prices that have been assessed for each year selected based on grade and body color, and select the basic assessment price. Addition and subtraction per km based on the expected actual mileage at the scheduled trade-in time calculated based on the current mileage of the vehicle to be assessed and the standard mileage at the scheduled trade-in time of the vehicle type. The valuation price for determining the trade-in assessment price by adding the actual mileage amount based on the sum and adding the surveillance remaining period addition amount based on the monthly addition amount for the scrutineering period remaining at the scheduled trade-in time. A processing unit for predicting trade-in of a used car, which is constituted by arithmetic means; 16. After calculating a trade-in assessment price of the subject vehicle at the originally designated trade-in scheduled time, change the date of the trade-in scheduled time to a date of a different trade-in scheduled time and specify. Means for changing the scheduled trade-in time, and the base price of the model based on the date of the planned trade-in time after the change of the vehicle to be assessed is calculated based on the current mileage of the vehicle to be assessed. Based on the expected actual mileage at the scheduled trade-in time, and the actual mileage based on the amount added / subtracted per km based on the mileage and the standard mileage at the scheduled trade-in time after the change of the vehicle type, and An assessment price calculation means for determining a trade-in assessment price by adding a surveillance remaining period addition amount based on an additional amount per month of a car inspection period remaining at the scheduled trade-in time after the change; At the time of the originally scheduled trade-in time 16. A trade-in assessment price comparison means for comparing the assessment price with the trade-in assessment price at the scheduled trade-in time after the change and calculating and displaying the difference between the assessment price and the trade-in assessment price. Processing unit for trade-in prediction assessment. 17. A manufacturer selecting means for selecting a manufacturer of a vehicle to be assessed from among a large number of manufacturers stored in advance, a date of registration of a vehicle to be assessed in a first year, a date of expiration of a vehicle inspection, and an exhaust gas. First year registration etc. input means for inputting the amount, the manufacturer selected by the manufacturer selecting means, and the first year registration date and displacement input by the first year registration etc. input means are stored in advance. Vehicle type selection means for selecting the vehicle type of the vehicle to be assessed from among the vehicle types of the manufacturer released on the date of registration for the first year, and the mileage for inputting the current total mileage of the vehicle to be assessed The input means, the desired transfer time specifying means for inputting the desired transfer time of the assessment target vehicle, and the vehicle type of the assessment target vehicle selected by the vehicle type selection means are recorded in advance. A grade selecting means for selecting a grade of the vehicle to be assessed from among a plurality of grades existing in the car type remembered, and a first year registration date inputted by the first year registration etc. input means, which are stored in advance. A release period selecting means for selecting a release period of the vehicle to be assessed from one or more release periods of a model of the same model as the vehicle to be assessed that was sold at the time of registration of the first year; A body color selecting means for selecting a body color of the assessment target vehicle from a plurality of body colors stored in advance based on the release period selected by the release period selection means; a vehicle type of the assessment target vehicle;
Select a basic assessment price of the current year of the subject vehicle from a plurality of pre-stored basic assessment prices which are assessed for each model selected based on grade and body color, and perform the basic assessment. To the price, add the actual mileage based on the amount of addition / subtraction per 1 km based on the difference between the current mileage of the vehicle to be assessed and the standard mileage to date of the vehicle type, and the period of the remaining vehicle inspection The current assessment price calculation means for determining the current trade-in assessment price by adding the surveillance remaining period addition amount based on the monthly addition amount, and the vehicle type, grade and body color of the assessment target vehicle. From the plurality of pre-stored basic assessment prices respectively assessed for each selected model year, select the basic assessment price of the model year of the vehicle to be assessed, and add the previous basic assessment price to the basic assessment price. The estimated actual mileage at the desired transfer time calculated based on the current mileage of the vehicle to be assessed, and the amount of addition / subtraction per km based on the difference between the mileage and the standard mileage at the desired transfer time for the vehicle type. The required transfer is determined by adding an actual amount of travel distance based on the vehicle and adding an additional amount of vehicle inspection remaining period based on an additional amount per month of a vehicle inspection period remaining at the desired transfer time to determine an assessment price of a desired transfer time. Comparing the current trade-in valuation price obtained by the current valuation price calculating means and the current transfer valuation price obtained by the desired transfer valuation price calculating means, and calculating the difference between the two; Processing device for predicting trade-in of a used car, comprising: an evaluation price comparison operation means for displaying and displaying the price; 18. A desired transfer time for calculating the trade-in assessment price of the subject vehicle at the originally specified desired transfer time, and then changing and specifying the desired transfer time to a different desired transfer time. The change means and the expected transfer time after the change calculated based on the current mileage of the vehicle to be evaluated, based on the yearly basic assessment price based on the date of the desired transfer time after the change of the vehicle to be evaluated. Based on the actual mileage, the mileage and the standard mileage at the desired transfer time after the change of the vehicle type, add the actual mileage amount based on the amount of addition / subtraction per 1 km, and change the desired transfer time after the change. Add the surveillance inspection period addition amount based on the monthly surcharge amount of the remaining inspection period, and consider the repair / repair subtraction amount based on the presence / absence of repair / repair locations of the subject vehicle. Determine the assessment price And a trade-in price comparison means for comparing the current calculated trade-in price and the trade-in price at the desired transfer time after the change and calculating and displaying the difference. The processing apparatus for trade-in prediction assessment of a used car according to claim 17, wherein the processing apparatus is configured. 19. When there is a change in the present condition of the exterior, the present condition of the interior, the present condition of the electric components, and the present condition of the engine / underbody of the vehicle to be assessed, the amount of addition or subtraction for the present condition is changed. Means for calculating the addition and subtraction amount based on the change in the current state, the addition and subtraction amount based on the current state of the exterior, the addition and subtraction amount based on the current state of the interior, the addition and subtraction amount based on the current state of the electrical components, and the current state of the engine and underbody. Claim 15, wherein the applicable item such as the amount of addition and subtraction based on the above is assessed in consideration of the trade-in assessment price at the desired transfer time.
16. The processing device for predicting trade-in of a used car according to claim 16, 17, or 18.