JP2020086937A - Unauthorized payment determination program, unauthorized payment determination device, and unauthorized payment determination method - Google Patents

Abstract

An object of the present invention is to suppress fraud in which a business owner and a job leaver cooperate with each other. [Solution] Receipt of application for benefits such as unemployment including information identifying a job separation, information on the business office where the job separation has been separated, information indicating the period of employment at the business office of the job separation, and employment By referring to the storage unit that stores the wage information indicating the wage received by the job separation person from the workplace during the period, the size of the business establishment that the job separation person worked for is less than a predetermined size, and the job separation person If the period of employment satisfies the conditions related to the period of employment and the wage information of the separated employee satisfies the conditions related to wages, calculate the estimated tax payment amount of the separated person's income tax during the period of employment, and the individual number information of the separated person Based on this, inquire about the tax payment information that indicates the history of income tax payment of the separated employee, obtain the tax payment amount, and determine whether or not there is a suspicion of fraudulent receipt according to the size of the difference between the estimated tax payment amount and the tax payment amount. Let the computer do the work. [Selection drawing] Fig. 10

Description

The present invention relates to an unauthorized receipt determination program, an unauthorized receipt determination device, and an unauthorized receipt determination method.

Conventionally, when an employee working at an organization such as a company or an organization leaves the job, he/she can receive unemployment benefits by submitting an employment insurance job separation certificate to the public employment security office under his/her jurisdiction.

JP, 2010-250604, A

In recent years, there have been nearly 10,000 cases of unemployment benefits being illegally received each year, and taxes are wasted.

In one aspect, the present invention is directed to suppressing fraud in which a business owner and a person leaving a job cooperate.

In one aspect, registration of an application for receiving benefits such as unemployment that includes information identifying a leaver, establishment information of the establishment where the leaver left the job, and information indicating the working period at the establishment of the leaver , The scale of the establishment where the employee has been working is of a predetermined scale by referring to the leaver information storage unit that stores the wage information indicating the wages received by the employee from the establishment during the working period in association with each other. If the employment period of the quitter satisfies the conditions regarding the employment period and the wage information of the quitter satisfies the conditions regarding wages, the estimated tax payment amount of the quitter's income tax during the employment period is as follows: Based on the information about the number of the employee leaving the taxpayer, the tax payment information indicating the history of income tax payment of the employee leaving is obtained to obtain the tax payment amount, and the amount of difference between the estimated tax payment amount and the tax payment amount is calculated. According to the above, the computer is caused to execute a process of determining whether there is a suspicion of illegal receipt.

Each of the above processes may be a functional unit that implements each of the above processes, or a procedure that implements each process, or may be a computer-readable storage medium that stores a program that causes a computer to execute each process.

It is possible to suppress fraud in which the business owner and the employee leaving work cooperate.

It is a figure explaining an unauthorized receipt determination system. It is a figure which shows an example of the hardware constitutions of an unauthorized receipt determination device. It is a figure which shows an example of a business establishment database. It is a figure which shows an example of an insured person database. It is a figure which shows an example of the job separation database. It is a figure which shows an example of a simulation result database. It is a figure which shows an example of an income tax calculation database. It is a figure explaining the function of the illegal receipt determination device. It is a flow chart explaining operation of a fraudulent payment judging device. It is a figure which shows the example of a display of a terminal device.

Embodiments will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an unauthorized payment determination system.

The unauthorized payment determination system 100 of this embodiment includes an unauthorized payment determination device 200 and a terminal device 300, both of which are connected via a network or the like.

The fraudulent receipt determination device 200 of the present embodiment determines whether or not the unemployment benefit that the employee leaving the organization such as a company or an institution intends to receive is unlawful in collusion with the employer. The result is transmitted to the terminal device 300. In the following description, the determination made by the unauthorized receipt determination device 200 may be referred to as an unauthorized receipt determination.

The terminal device 300 is, for example, an example of an information processing device installed in public employment security offices nationwide. In the following explanation, the Public Employment Security Office is called Hello Work.

The fraudulent payment determination device 200 of this embodiment includes a business establishment database 210, an insured database 220, a job separation database 230, a simulation result database 240, an income tax calculation database 250, and a fraudulent payment determination processing unit 260.

The business office database 210 stores information on business offices throughout the country. The insured person database 220 stores information about the insured person of employment insurance employed by the business owner. The employee turnover database 230 stores information about the employee who left the organization such as a company or an organization.

The business establishment database 210, the insured database 220, and the job separation slip database 230 of this embodiment are managed by Hello Work, for example, and may be acquired from the server device of Hello Work.

The simulation result database 240 stores the simulation result by the unauthorized payment determination processing unit 260. The income tax calculation information storage unit 250 stores information necessary for a simulation for calculating income tax.

The fraudulent payment determination processing unit 260 refers to the business establishment database 210, the insured person database 220, and the job separation slip database 230, and extracts a job leaver who is a target person who makes a fraudulent payment determination.

Next, the fraudulent payment determination processing unit 260 refers to the income tax calculation database 250 and obtains the amount of income tax that the extracted employee turnover would have paid by simulation. Next, the fraudulent payment determination processing unit 260 acquires tax payment information of the employee leaving the external server device 400 based on the personal number of the employee leaving and collates it with the simulation result.

Then, the unjust receipt determination processing unit 260 determines whether or not the unemployed person is attempting to unfairly receive benefits such as unemployment according to the result of the collation, by collaborating with the business owner (collusion). The determination result of is transmitted to the terminal device 300.

The external server device 400 is a server device provided in a tax office or the like and storing tax payment information for each employee.

Here, a point of interest when extracting a target person who makes an unauthorized receipt determination will be described.

For unemployment benefits, the amount to be paid is determined based on the information obtained from the turnover slip created by the business owner. Therefore, it is assumed that business owners are conspiring in cases where fraudulent payments are suspected, but in large organizations such as large corporations, it is unlikely that business owners will collude with retirees.

Therefore, first, in the present embodiment, the first condition for focusing on the scale of the business establishment and extracting the target person who makes the fraudulent receipt determination is that the scale of the business establishment is the scale corresponding to the small and medium-sized enterprise. Specifically, for example, the first condition is that the business establishment has 300 or less employees.

Further, in the present embodiment, focusing on the conditions for qualifying to receive benefits such as unemployment, the second condition for extracting a person who makes an unfair receipt determination is to leave the job after becoming an employee of employment insurance. The period up to is satisfied with the conditions for being eligible for unemployment benefits and is shorter than the prescribed period. Specifically, for example, the second condition is that the period from becoming an employee of employment insurance until leaving the job is one year or more and less than one and a half years.

Further, in the present embodiment, focusing on the fact that the higher the wage, the higher the amount of payment of unemployment benefits, etc., and the third condition for extracting the person who makes an illegal receipt determination is that the monthly wage is a certain amount or more. There is. Specifically, the third condition is that the monthly wage is 300,000 yen or more.

In the present embodiment, focusing on the above three points, the target person who makes the fraudulent receipt determination is extracted, and the process of the fraudulent receipt determination is performed only on the extracted target person, so that the processing load can be reduced. In addition, in the present embodiment, the target person is extracted under the condition determined based on the above-mentioned point of interest, so that the employee leaving the suspicion of illegal receipt can be extracted with high accuracy.

Further, in the present embodiment, by comparing the amount of the income tax obtained using the information on the turnover slip created by the business owner with the tax payment information associated with the my number of the turnover person, the turnover person and the business owner It is possible to determine whether or not fraudulent cooperation with and is being performed. In addition, in the present embodiment, since the determination result is output to the terminal device 300, it is possible to notify the employee of Hello Work in which the terminal device 300 is arranged of the unemployed person who is trying to receive the fraud, thereby preventing fraud. it can.

Below, the illegal receipt determination device 200 of the present embodiment will be explained. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of the hardware configuration of the unauthorized payment determination device.

The improper acceptance determination device 200 of this embodiment includes an input device 21, an output device 22, a drive device 23, an auxiliary storage device 24, a memory device 25, an arithmetic processing device 26, and an interface device 27, which are connected to each other by a bus B. It is an information processing apparatus including.

The input device 21 is a device for inputting various kinds of information, and is realized by, for example, a keyboard or a pointing device. The output device 22 is for outputting various kinds of information, and is realized by, for example, a display. The interface device 27 includes a LAN card and the like and is used to connect to a network.

The fraudulent payment determination program that realizes the fraudulent payment determination processing unit 260 is at least a part of various programs that control the fraudulent payment determination device 200. The fraudulent payment determination program is provided, for example, by distributing the storage medium 28 or downloading from the network. The storage medium 28 recording the unauthorized receipt determination program is a storage medium such as a CD-ROM, a flexible disk, or a magneto-optical disk for recording information optically, electrically or magnetically, a ROM, a flash memory, or the like. Various types of storage media such as a semiconductor memory for electrically recording information can be used.

In addition, when the storage medium 28 recording the unauthorized receipt determination program is set in the drive device 23, the unauthorized receipt determination program is installed in the auxiliary storage device 24 from the storage medium 48 via the drive device 23. The unauthorized payment determination program downloaded from the network is installed in the auxiliary storage device 24 via the interface device 27.

The auxiliary storage device 24 stores the installed fraudulent payment determination program, and also stores various necessary files and data such as log information collected by the fraudulent payment determination device 200. The memory device 25 reads and stores the unauthorized receipt determination program from the auxiliary storage device 24 when the unauthorized receipt determination device 200 is activated. Then, the arithmetic processing unit 26 realizes various processes described later according to the unauthorized receipt determination program stored in the memory unit 25.

Next, with reference to FIGS. 3 to 7, each storage unit included in the unauthorized payment determination device 200 according to the present embodiment will be described. In the present embodiment, each database is provided in the unauthorized payment determination device 200, but the present invention is not limited to this. Each database of the present embodiment may be provided in a device other than the unauthorized payment determination device 200.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the business office database. The establishment database 210 of the present embodiment includes establishment numbers, the number of employees, establishment names, etc. as information items, and the item “establishment number” is associated with other items.

The value of the item “business office number” indicates identification information that identifies the business office. The value of the item “number of employees” indicates the number of employees of the business establishment. The value of the item “business office name” indicates the business office name. The business establishment database 210 may include items other than the items shown in FIG.

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of the insured person database. The insured person database 220 of the present embodiment includes, as information items, a business office number, an insured person number, a branch number, a working period, a personal number, etc., and an item “insured person number” and other items. Are associated with.

The value of the item “insured person number” is an identification number for identifying the person insured by employment insurance. The value of the item “branch number” indicates the branch number of the insured person number.

The item "working period" is associated with the items "working date" and "leaving date", and the value of the item "working date" is specified by the insured person by the office number. Indicates the date of employment at a business establishment, and the value of the item “Job separation date” indicates the date when the insured retires (leaves work) at the business office specified by the business office number.

The value of the item “my number” indicates the insured's my number. My number is a number for identifying a specific individual in an administrative procedure.

In the following description, information including the value of the item “insured person number” and the values of other items is referred to as insured person information.

The insured person database 220 of the present embodiment may include items other than the items shown in FIG.

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of a job separation slip database. The job separation database 230 of the present embodiment includes, as information items, an insured person number, wage information, my number, and the like, and the item "insured person number" is associated with other items. The information stored in the job separation database 230 is acquired by reading the job separation sheet brought to Hello Work by the employee.

The item “wage information” has items “wage payment target period (start)”, “wage payment target period (end)”, and “wage”. The value of the item "Wage payment target period (start)" and the value of the item "Wage payment target period (end)" are the payment of wages to the insured specified by the insured number, respectively. The date and time when it started and the date and time when payment of wages ended are shown. The value of the item “wage” indicates the wage paid to the insured during the wage payment target period.

In other words, the job separation slip database 230 of the present embodiment stores information about the office where the employee left employment, information indicating the employment period of the employee at the employment office, and wages received by the employee from the company during the employment period. It is an example of an employee turnover information storage unit that stores wage information shown in association with each other.

In the following description, information including the value of the item “insured person information” and the values of other items in the employee turnover database 230 is referred to as employee turnover information. Note that the job separation slip database 230 may include items other than the items shown in FIG.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of the simulation result database. The simulation result database 240 of the present embodiment has, as information items, my number, wage information, income tax simulation result, tax payment information, and determination result, and the item "my number" and other items are associated with each other. ..

The value of the item “income tax simulation result” indicates the result of executing the simulation for calculating the income tax.

The item "tax payment information" is associated with the items "wage payment target period (start)", "wage payment target period (end)", and "income tax". The value of the item "tax payment information" is the tax office of each region. This information is obtained from the server device 400 provided in the above and is information indicating the tax payment history of an individual identified by the My Number.

The value of the item “income tax” indicates the amount of income tax paid by the individual identified by My Number during the period from the wage payment target period (start) to the wage payment target period (end) included in the tax payment information. The value of the item “judgment result” indicates the result of the unauthorized payment judgment.

In the following description, in the simulation result database 240, information including the value of the item “my number” and the values of other items is referred to as simulation result information.

In the present embodiment, the values of the items “income tax simulation result”, “tax payment information”, and “judgment result” are stored in the simulation result database 240 by the processing of the fraudulent receipt detection processing unit 260.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of an income tax calculation database. The income tax calculation database 250 of this embodiment has taxable income amount, tax rate, and tax deduction amount as information items. These items are predetermined items used for income tax calculation, and the value of each item is also predetermined.

Next, with reference to FIG. 8, the fraudulent receipt determination processing unit 260 of the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the function of the unauthorized payment determination device.

The unauthorized payment determination device 200 of this embodiment includes an unauthorized payment determination processing unit 260. The unauthorized payment detection processing unit 260 is realized by the arithmetic processing unit 26 of the unauthorized payment determination apparatus 200 reading and executing the unauthorized payment determination program stored in the memory device 25.

The fraudulent receipt determination processing unit 260 according to the present embodiment includes a condition holding unit 261, a business office extraction unit 262, a quitter extraction unit 263, a simulation execution unit 264, a tax payment information acquisition unit 265, a collation unit 266, a fraud determination unit 267, and a list. It has a generation unit 268 and an output unit 269.

The condition holding unit 261 holds a condition for extracting a target person who makes an unauthorized receipt determination. The conditions held by the condition holding unit 261 are the above-mentioned first condition, second condition, and third condition.

The establishment extracting unit 262 extracts establishments satisfying the first condition held by the condition holding unit 261 from the establishments stored in the establishment database 210. The business establishment extracting unit 262 may extract the business establishment by accepting registration of the application for receiving the benefits such as unemployment including the information for identifying the employee who left the job. In other words, the business office extraction unit 262 is an example of a reception unit that receives registration of an application for receiving benefits such as unemployment benefits.

The unemployed person extraction unit 263 refers to the insured person database 220 and extracts the insured person associated with the business establishment extracted by the business establishment extraction unit 262. Further, the employee separation unit 263 refers to the employee separation slip database 230 from the extracted insured persons, and selects the employee separation workers who satisfy the second condition and the third condition held in the condition holding unit 261. Extract.

The simulation executing unit 264 refers to the income tax calculation database 250 for the quitters extracted by the quitter extraction unit 263, and calculates the amount of income tax estimated to be paid by each quitter. In other words, the simulation executing unit 264 is an example of a trial calculation amount calculation unit that calculates the trial tax payment amount of income tax for each of the extracted employee turnovers.

The tax payment information acquisition unit 265 acquires tax payment information from the server device 400 based on the personal number of the employee leaving the job extracted by the employee leaving extraction unit 263.

The matching unit 266 matches the amount of income tax calculated by the simulation execution unit 264 with the amount of income tax included in the tax payment information acquired by the tax payment information acquisition unit 265.

The fraud determination unit 267 determines, based on the result of the collation unit 266, whether or not there is a suspicion that the employee leaving is trying to receive fraud.

The list generation unit 268 generates a list listing the determination results by the injustice determination unit 267. Specifically, the list generation unit 268 sets the simulation result information stored in the simulation result database 240 as information for each area under the control of Hello Work in which the terminal device 300 is installed. Therefore, in the present embodiment, the list output to the terminal device 300 is a list of simulation result information.

The list generation unit 268 lists the determination results by grouping the simulation result information for each Hello Work jurisdiction in accordance with the office number of the office associated with the My Number included in the simulation result information. The list can be

The output unit 269 outputs (delivers) the list generated by the list generation unit 268 to each terminal device 300.

Hereinafter, with reference to FIG. 9, the operation of the improper payment determination device 200 according to the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating the operation of the unauthorized payment determination device. Note that the process of FIG. 9 may be executed periodically, for example, at night or at a predetermined timing.

Further, the process of FIG. 9 may be executed on the terminal device 300 on the day when new leaver information is input, and the registration (application) of the application for receiving the benefits such as unemployment is received.

In the fraudulent receipt determination processing unit 260 of this embodiment, the business establishment extraction unit 262 refers to the business establishment database 210 and acquires the number of employees of each business establishment (step S901). Subsequently, the business establishment extracting unit 262 extracts a business establishment that satisfies the first condition stored in the condition holding unit 261 (step S902). Specifically, the business establishment extracting unit 262 extracts business establishments having 300 or less employees.

Subsequently, the unjust employee determination processing unit 260 refers to the insured person database 220 by the employee separation unit 263 and refers to the insured person database 220, and among the employees of the extracted business establishments, those who have a working period satisfying the second condition. It is determined whether or not exists (step S903). Specifically, the retired employee extraction unit 263 determines whether or not there is a retired person whose working period is less than one and a half years.

In step S903, if there is no corresponding employee leaving the job, fraudulent receipt determination processing unit 260 ends the processing. In step S903, if there is a corresponding employee leaving, the employee extracting unit 263 extracts the relevant employee (step S904).

Subsequently, the employee separation section 263 refers to the employee separation slip database 230, and among the employee separation extracted in step S904, there is a person who satisfies the third condition held in the condition holding unit 261. It is determined whether or not (step S905). Specifically, the retired employee extraction unit 263 determines whether or not there is a retired employee whose monthly wage is 300,000 yen or more among the retired persons extracted in step S904.

In step S905, if there is no corresponding employee leaving, the unauthorized pay determination processing unit 260 ends the process. In step S905, when there is a corresponding employee leaving, the employee extracting unit 263 extracts the appropriate employee from the employee extracted in step S604 (step S906). The person leaving the job extracted in step S906 is a target person who makes an unauthorized pay determination.

Subsequently, the improper payment determination processing unit 260 uses the simulation execution unit 264 to refer to the income tax calculation database 250 and calculate the income tax based on the wage information of the past 6 months for each of the extracted employee turnover (target person). (Step S907).

The calculated income tax is stored in the simulation result database 240 as the value of the item “income tax simulation result” in association with the my number of the employee leaving the job.

Subsequently, the fraudulent receipt determination processing unit 260 causes the tax payment information acquisition unit 265 to acquire, from the server device 400, the tax payment information associated with the my number for each employee who left the job (step S908).

The tax payment information acquired here is stored in the simulation result database 240 as the value of the item “tax payment information” in association with the my number of the employee leaving the job.

Subsequently, the fraudulent receipt determination processing unit 260 selects the employee leaving person (target person) extracted in step S906 by the collation unit 266 (step S909).

Subsequently, the collation unit 266 collates the income tax, which is the simulation result calculated in step S907, with the income tax included in the tax payment information acquired in step S908 for the selected employee leaving, and the fraud determination unit 267 determines Is determined (step S910).

If they match in step S910, the fraud determination unit 267 determines that there is no suspicion of improper payment, and displays information indicating that the procedure for receiving benefits such as unemployment is permitted, in the item “determination” of the simulation result database 240. The value of “result” is stored in association with the personal number of the employee leaving the job (step S911).

If they do not match in step S910, the fraud determination unit 267 associates the information indicating that there is a possibility of fraudulent receipt, the value of the item “determination result” of the simulation result database 240, with the my number of the employee leaving the job. And store (step S912).

It should be noted that the fraud determination unit 267 of the present embodiment determines that there is a suspicion of fraudulent receipt when the income tax as a simulation result and the income tax included in the tax payment information do not match, but the method of determination is this. Not limited to.

The fraud determination unit 267 may determine that there is a suspicion of fraudulent payment, for example, when the difference between the income tax as a simulation result and the income tax included in the tax payment information is equal to or more than a predetermined amount.

Subsequently, the improper payment determination processing unit 260 determines whether or not the list generation unit 268 has performed the process for all the employee leaving persons (target persons) extracted in step S906 (step S913). In step S913, when the process has not been executed for all the employee leaving persons (target persons), the improper payment determination processing unit 260 returns to step S909.

In step S913, when the process has been executed for all the employee leaving persons (target persons), the improper payment determination processing unit 260 causes the list generation unit 268 to generate a list indicating the determination result, and the output unit 269. Thus, each terminal device 300 associated with the list is output (step S914), and the process ends.

In the present embodiment, the processing of FIG. 9 is supposed to be executed periodically, but the present invention is not limited to this. The process of FIG. 9 may be executed, for example, each time Hello Work is read from a new job separation slip in Hello Work.

In that case, the fraudulent payment determination processing unit 260 determines that the business establishment indicated on the new turnover slip satisfies the first condition and the turnover indicated on the new turnover condition satisfies the second and third conditions. Then, the tax payment information of the employee who left the job should be acquired and collated with the wage information of the employee information.

In this way, when a person leaving a job visits Hello Work for the procedure for receiving benefits such as unemployment, the decision result for the person leaving the job can be obtained on the spot.

Below, with reference to FIG. 10, a list showing the determination results by the unauthorized payment determination processing unit 260 of the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a display example of the terminal device.

The screen 301 of the present embodiment is an example of a screen displayed on the terminal device 300 installed in Hello Work.

A list 302 generated by the list generation unit 268 is displayed on the screen 301. In the list 302, for each employee leaving based on the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition, my number, wage information managed by Hello Work, and tax payment information managed by the tax office, The determination result obtained by comparing the two is displayed as a list.

In FIG. 10, for example, the income tax of the simulation result calculated from the wage information of the working period “2017/1221 to 2017/12/31” is 19,000 yen for the employee who has left the job number “1234567889012”. The income tax of the tax payment information is 12,000 yen.

In this case, if the wage indicated in the wage information in the leaver information was paid during the working period of this leaver, despite the fact that the income tax of 19,000 yen should be paid, It can be seen that the income tax actually paid was 12,000 yen.

Therefore, in this case, in order to increase the amount of unemployment benefits paid, it can be seen that the employer who employed this employee has tampered with the wage information on the employee turnover slip during this working period. .

Also, for example, for the employee who has left my number "1234567889012", the income tax of the simulation result calculated from the wage information during the working period "2017/10/21-2017/11/20" is 40,000 yen. The income tax in the tax payment information is also 40,000 yen.

Therefore, it can be seen that the business owner who employed this turnover did not falsify the wage information on the turnover slip during this working period.

As described above, according to the present embodiment, the wage information managed by Hello Work and the tax payment information managed by the tax office are associated with each other by using the My Number, based on the turnover slip created by the business owner. .. Then, in the present embodiment, by comparing the two, it is possible to determine whether or not there is a suspicion of illegal receipt of benefits such as unemployment, and it is possible to suppress fraud.

In the disclosed technique, the following additional forms are possible.
(Appendix 1)
If you accept the registration of the application for receiving benefits such as unemployment, which includes information that identifies the person leaving the job,
An employee who has stored the business information of the office where the employee left the office, the information indicating the working period of the employee who left the office, and the wage information indicating the wage received by the employee from the office during the working period. Referring to the information storage section,
When the size of the establishment where the employee left is working is less than or equal to a predetermined scale, the working period of the said employee meets the conditions concerning the working period, and the wage information of the said employee satisfies the conditions concerning wages. , Calculate the tax payment estimated amount of the income tax of the employee leaving the working period,
Based on the personal number information of the employee who left the job, the tax payment information indicating the history of income tax payment of the employee who left the job was inquired to obtain the tax amount,
A fraudulent receipt determination program for causing a computer to execute a process of determining whether there is a suspicion of illegal receipt according to the size of the difference between the trial tax payment amount and the tax payment amount.
(Appendix 2)
The conditions regarding the working period are
The working period of the employee leaving the job satisfies the condition for qualifying to receive benefits such as unemployment, and is shorter than a predetermined period,
The conditions for wages are:
The illegal pay determination program according to appendix 1, wherein the monthly wage of the employee leaving the work period is equal to or more than a certain amount.
(Appendix 3)
The conditions regarding the working period are
The period from the time the said employee left to become an employee of employment insurance until he/she leaves the job is 1 year or more and less than 1 year and a half,
The conditions for wages are:
The illegal pay determination program according to appendix 2, wherein the monthly wage of the employee leaving the work period is 300,000 yen or more.
(Appendix 4)
Any one of appendices 1 to 3, which causes the computer to execute a process of outputting information for displaying a list of determination results of the presence or absence of the suspicion of improper payment for each employee who has calculated the estimated tax payment amount. Unauthorized receipt determination program described in the section.
(Appendix 5)
The above list is
The illegal receipt determination program according to appendix 4, including the wage information, the estimated tax payment amount, the tax payment amount of the employee, and the determination result for each employee who has calculated the estimated tax payment amount.
(Appendix 6)
A method for determining fraudulent payment by a computer, wherein the computer comprises:
If you accept the registration of the application for receiving benefits such as unemployment, which includes information that identifies the person leaving the job,
An employee who has stored the business information of the office where the employee left the office, the information indicating the working period of the employee who left the office, and the wage information indicating the wage received by the employee from the office during the working period. Referring to the information storage section,
When the size of the establishment where the employee left is working is less than or equal to a predetermined scale, the working period of the said employee meets the conditions concerning the working period, and the wage information of the said employee satisfies the conditions concerning wages. , Calculate the tax payment estimated amount of the income tax of the employee leaving the working period,
Obtain tax payment amount by inquiring tax payment information indicating the history of income tax payment of the leaver based on My Number information of the leaver,
A fraudulent receipt determination method for determining whether there is a suspicion of fraudulent receipt according to the size of the difference between the tax payment trial calculation amount and the tax payment amount.
(Appendix 7)
Upon receiving the registration of the application for receiving the benefits such as unemployment including the information identifying the person leaving the office, the office information of the office where the employee left the job, information indicating the working period of the office of the employee leaving, The scale of the establishment where the employee left is less than or equal to a predetermined scale by referring to the leaver information storage unit that stores the wage information indicating the wage received by the employee from the establishment. When the working period of (1) satisfies the conditions related to the working period and the wage information of the employee who left the job satisfies the condition related to wages, a trial calculation amount calculation unit that calculates the estimated tax payment amount of the income tax of the employee who left the working period. When,
A tax payment information acquisition unit that acquires tax payment amount by inquiring tax payment information indicating a history of income tax payment of the leaver based on my number information of the leaver;
A fraudulent receipt determination device comprising: a fraud determination unit that determines whether there is a suspicion of fraudulent receipt according to the size of the difference between the tax payment trial calculation amount and the tax payment amount.

The present invention is not limited to the specifically disclosed embodiments, and various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the claims.

100 Unauthorized Receiving Judgment System 200 Unauthorized Receiving Judgment Device 210 Business Site Database 220 Insured Database 230 Resignation Form Database 240 Simulation Result Database 250 Income Tax Calculation Database 260 Unauthorized Receiving Judgment Processing Section 261 Condition Holding Section 262 Business Location Extracting Section 263 Retirement Person Extraction Part 264 simulation execution part 265 tax payment information acquisition part 266 collation part
267 Fraud determination unit 268 List generation unit 269 Output unit 300 Terminal device

Claims (6)

Accept registration for applications to receive benefits such as unemployment, including information that identifies those who have left the company,
The office information of the business office where the employee left the job, the information indicating the working period of the employee of the employee leaving the office, and the wage information indicating the wage received by the employee from the office during the working period, in association with each other. With reference to the stored employee separation information storage unit, the scale of the establishment where the employee left was working is less than or equal to a predetermined scale, the working period of the said employee satisfied the conditions relating to the working period, and said employee leaving If the wage information of the employee satisfies the conditions related to wages, calculate the estimated tax payment amount of the income tax of the employee leaving the working period,
Based on the personal number information of the employee who left the job, the tax payment information indicating the history of income tax payment of the employee who left the job was inquired to obtain the tax amount,
A fraudulent payment determination program for causing a computer to execute a process for determining whether there is a suspicion of illegal payment according to the amount of difference between the tax payment estimated amount and the tax payment amount. The condition relating to the working period is that the working period of the employee leaving is satisfied with a condition for obtaining eligibility for benefits such as unemployment, and is shorter than a predetermined period,
The unauthorized pay determination program according to claim 1, wherein the condition regarding the wage is that the monthly wage of the employee leaving the work period is equal to or more than a certain amount. The condition regarding the working period is that the period from the time the employee left to become an employee of employment insurance to the time he/she leaves the job is 1 year or more and less than 1 year and a half.
The conditions regarding wages are:
The unauthorized pay determination program according to claim 2, wherein the monthly wage of the employee leaving the work period is 300,000 yen or more. 4. The computer is caused to execute a process of outputting information for displaying a list of determination results of the presence or absence of the suspicion of illegal receipt for each employee who has calculated the estimated tax payment amount. The fraudulent payment determination program according to one item. A method for determining fraudulent receipt by a computer, wherein the computer comprises:
Accept registration for applications to receive benefits such as unemployment, including information that identifies those who have left the company,
Store the business information of the office where the employee left the job, the information indicating the working period of the employee of the employee and the wage information indicating the wage received by the employee from the office during the working period in association with each other. The size of the place of business where the quitter was working is less than or equal to a predetermined scale, and the working period of the quitter satisfies the conditions regarding the working period, and the quitter is referred to. If the wage information of, satisfies the conditions related to wages, calculate the tax payment estimated amount of the income tax of the said employee during the working period,
Based on the personal number information of the employee who left the job, the tax payment information indicating the history of income tax payment of the employee who left the employee was inquired to obtain the tax payment amount,
A fraudulent receipt determination method for determining whether there is a suspicion of fraudulent receipt according to the size of the difference between the tax payment estimated amount and the tax payment amount. A reception section that receives registration of an application for receiving benefits such as unemployment, including information that identifies the employee who left the job,
Store the business information of the office where the employee left the job, the information indicating the working period of the employee of the employee and the wage information indicating the wage received by the employee from the office during the working period in association with each other. The size of the place of business where the quitter was working is less than or equal to a predetermined scale, and the working period of the quitter satisfies the conditions regarding the working period, and the quitter is referred to. If the wage information of, satisfies the conditions related to wages, a trial calculation amount calculation unit for calculating a trial calculation amount of income tax of the employee leaving the working period,
A tax payment information acquisition unit that acquires tax payment amount by inquiring tax payment information indicating a history of income tax payment of the leaver based on my number information of the leaver;
A fraudulent receipt determination device comprising: a fraud determination unit that determines whether there is a suspicion of fraudulent receipt according to the size of the difference between the tax payment trial calculation amount and the tax payment amount.

Images