JP2009301239A - Authentication mark controller and authentication mark control program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To diagnose a web content a plurality of times and give an authentication mark according to the latest diagnosis result to the web content.
An authentication mark control apparatus 101 is connected to a web server 103.104 via a network 102 so as to be communicable. The information storage unit 5 stores the web content to be diagnosed acquired from the web server 103.104. The information diagnostic unit 6 (1) periodically, (2) when updating web content, (3) browsing by web viewers, according to preset authentication standards such as universal design for web content stored in the information storage unit 5 Diagnose occasionally, reflect the diagnostic result of the web content, and rewrite the authentication mark.
[Selection] Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to an authentication mark control apparatus and an authentication mark control program for diagnosing web content mainly published on the Internet according to an authentication standard and providing an authentication mark according to the diagnosis result.

  With the progress of the Internet society, opportunities for information acquisition via the Internet have increased. Along with this, web content is required to be designed so that anyone can handle it. This is called web accessibility, or web universal design, and is becoming increasingly important. “Usability” is called usability, and it is necessary to devise web content from various viewpoints. For example, from the viewpoint of the universal design of the web, for the viewer who cannot browse the image, add alternative text to the image included in the web content, or relative size of the text so that the viewer can freely enlarge the text It is effective to specify the value or increase the brightness contrast between the background color and the text color. In relation to this, Patent Document 1 describes a voice browser system that can use the web even for visually impaired persons.

  Standards for these items to be considered are defined in “Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0” of W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) and “JIS X8341-3” of JIS standard. If these criteria are used, it is possible to diagnose whether the web content corresponds to a standard such as universal design. A check tool based on these standards has also been developed and made public. By using this check tool, it is possible to efficiently diagnose web contents.

  For example, the item “add alt text to an image” means “set an alt attribute to an IMG element”, search for an IMG tag in an HTML document, and “alt =“ ABC ”” or the like. If there is, it can be said that this item is satisfied. In this case, “ABC” is the alternative text. At this time, the check tool has a pattern matching function, which is one of the character string search techniques, and searches for a tag <IMG> in the HTML document, and an expression such as “alt =“ ABC ”” is included therein. Check if it exists.

  For example, the IMG tag has a form of <IMG src = “image / image.jpg” alt = “ABC” width = 100 height = 100>. In such a case, if “alt” is present before “<IMG” and ends with “>”, it can be diagnosed as OK, otherwise NG can be diagnosed.

  By diagnosing a web page using guidelines and check tools in this way, it is possible to check whether the web complies with standards such as universal design. Moreover, if there is a certain standard for web usability or the like, it is possible to make a diagnosis. For example, if a criterion such as “A phone number is also written on the map page” is set, diagnosis can be performed based on the diagnosis criterion. In this way, diagnosis can be performed according to any standard other than the universal design.

When a diagnosis is performed using such a check tool, there are services such as marking a diagnosed web page.
JP-A-11-249867

  However, in the past, although it was possible to place a certification mark on web content that complies with a certain standard, the web content is updated daily, and even if the design is such that a certification mark is given at a certain point in time, it is updated. There may be a situation where the certification mark must be canceled at the moment.

  Therefore, there is a problem that the web viewer cannot know how reliable the authentication mark is even if it is web content with the authentication mark, and the reliability of the authentication mark cannot be increased.

  Therefore, the present invention has a problem to be solved by diagnosing web content a plurality of times and providing the web content with an authentication mark according to the latest diagnosis result.

  The present invention is a technical idea created to solve the above-mentioned problem, and diagnoses whether or not the content to be diagnosed satisfies the criteria such as universal design, and if so, the determination of pass On the other hand, if it does not meet the requirement, the pass judgment is cancelled.

  Specifically, the invention according to claim 1 is an authentication mark control apparatus that diagnoses content on the web via a network and adds an authentication mark according to the diagnosis result to the content, wherein the content is set in advance. Diagnostic means for diagnosing in accordance with any given authentication standard, wherein the diagnosing means diagnoses the content a plurality of times and rewrites the authentication mark according to each diagnosis result.

  The invention described in claim 2 is characterized in that the authentication standard is a universal design authentication standard.

  The invention according to claim 3 is characterized in that the diagnosis means periodically diagnoses the content according to a preset schedule.

  The invention according to claim 4 is characterized in that, when the update of the content to which the authentication mark is added is published, the diagnosis unit diagnoses the updated content before publication.

  The invention according to claim 5 is characterized in that, when the browser browses the content to which the authentication mark is given, the diagnostic unit diagnoses the content before the browser browses.

  The invention according to claim 6 is characterized in that, when the content is a website having a plurality of pages, the diagnosis means determines a diagnosis result for each page.

  The invention according to claim 7 is characterized in that, when the content is a website having a plurality of pages, the diagnosis means determines the diagnosis result of the website by combining the diagnosis results of the pages. Yes.

  The invention according to claim 8 further includes an information storage unit that stores the diagnosis results of the contents in time series, and the diagnosis unit stores the diagnosis results of the contents and the previous diagnosis stored in the information storage unit. When the result is different, the authentication mark is rewritten.

  The invention according to claim 9 is characterized in that the diagnosis means describes the previous diagnosis result stored in the information storage means in the authentication mark.

  The invention described in claim 10 is an authentication mark control program, wherein the computer functions as the authentication mark control apparatus described in any one of claims 1-9.

  According to the first to tenth aspects of the present invention, since the authentication mark reflecting the latest diagnosis result is given to the content, the reliability of the authentication mark is improved.

  In particular, according to the invention described in claim 3, since the content is regularly diagnosed according to the schedule, the latest diagnosis result is reflected in the authentication mark.

  According to the invention described in claim 4, the latest diagnosis result is reflected in the authentication mark of the updated content.

  According to the fifth aspect of the present invention, the latest diagnosis result is reflected in the authentication mark of the content to be browsed.

  The present invention is supposed to be used mainly for diagnosing whether web contents published on the Internet satisfy an authentication standard such as universal design. In the present invention, any standard such as usability can be used instead of the universal design standard. Hereinafter, the universal design standard will be described as an example. For example, as a result of diagnosing some items such as “Is there an alternative text on the image” or not, if the authentication standard is satisfied, the web content is given a pass determination.

  However, since web contents are updated every day, even if the certification standard is satisfied at a certain point in time, there is a possibility that the standard will be lost due to the update. In this case, the latest diagnosis result can be obtained by periodically diagnosing the web content or performing diagnosis at the timing when the web content is updated.

  Therefore, the present invention diagnoses web content (1) periodically, (2) when updating web content, (3) when browsing web content, and reflects the diagnosis result on an authentication mark displayed on the web content. ing. Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

(1) Configuration Example FIG. 1 shows a configuration example and a network configuration example of the authentication mark control apparatus 101 according to the embodiment of the present invention. The authentication mark control apparatus 101 is connected to the two web servers 103.104 and the web browser PC 105 via the network 102 so as to be communicable. According to the authentication mark control apparatus 101, web content to be diagnosed is acquired from the web server 103.104, a diagnosis based on the authentication standard is performed, and an authentication mark according to the diagnosis result is given. As the authentication standard, a standard is defined in W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 and JIS standard “JIS X8341-3”. However, the authentication standard is not limited to this, and can be appropriately changed to a standard that matches the diagnosis contents by setting and use.

  Specifically, the authentication mark control apparatus 101 is configured by a server or a personal computer (PC). As shown in FIG. 1, the information input unit 1 that is an input device such as a keyboard and a mouse, and control of each component. And a control unit 2 (for example, a CPU) for performing arithmetic processing, a transmission / reception unit 3 such as a communication device used for network connection, an information analysis unit 4 for imaging acquired web content, and a hard disk capable of recording processing data An information storage unit 5 constituted by storage means such as a drive device, an information diagnosis unit 6 that diagnoses web content based on authentication criteria, an information output unit 7 that is an output device such as a display and a speaker, and a diagnosis time are controlled And a timer 8 capable of performing diagnosis by reading out the authentication criteria stored in the hard disk drive device. Divide.

  The information analysis unit 4 images (renders) the web content information acquired from the web server 103.104 by calculation and displays the information on the information output unit 7 such as a display. This function is realized by causing the control unit 2 to execute a rendering application program installed in, for example, a hard disk drive of a computer.

  It is assumed that the information storage unit 5 stores the web content to be diagnosed acquired from the web server 103.104, the diagnosis result of the web content, and the like based on time series.

  The information diagnosis unit 6 diagnoses the web content to be diagnosed stored in the information storage unit 5 based on the authentication criteria. This diagnostic function is realized, for example, by installing a check tool or the like based on a publicly available authentication standard on a computer and executing it by the control unit 2 or the like.

  The timer 8 can be set in advance with a diagnosis schedule such as a date and time at which diagnosis is started and a diagnosis interval. Hereinafter, the diagnosis process of the authentication mark control apparatus 101 will be described along with the first to third embodiments.

(2) Example 1
In this embodiment, the authentication mark control device 101 periodically diagnoses a web page designated in advance according to a schedule, and controls the authentication mark given to the web page according to the diagnosis result. At this time, the diagnosis of the website composed of a plurality of web pages is performed from the diagnosis results of all the pages belonging to the website, and the pass / fail of the website is determined.

  Here, it is assumed that the authentication mark image data is stored in the information storage unit 5 in advance. In the information storage unit 5, a diagnosis target database for storing the URL of a web page to be diagnosed and the URL of the top page of the website to which the web page belongs is constructed. An example of this diagnosis target database is shown in Table 1.

  According to Table 1, each web page with the site reference number 1.2 was diagnosed at 10:00 on March 22, 2008. At this time, the timer 8 is set to perform diagnosis every 24 hours. Therefore, the next diagnosis is started on March 23, 2008 at 10:00. Here, taking the next diagnosis as an example, the operation of the authentication mark control apparatus 101 will be described based on the flowchart of FIG.

  S01: First, when the date set by the timer 8 is reached, the control unit 2 refers to the diagnosis target database in the information storage unit 5 and reads the first diagnosis target URL. Here, the URL to be diagnosed with page number 1 in Table 1 is read. This URL is “http://www.aaa.jp/aaa/index.html”. This page is referred to as a web page 1 using a page number.

  S02: The control unit 2 communicates with the web server 103 storing the web page 1 through the transmission / reception unit 3 and the network 102, and receives the web page 1. At this time, it is assumed that the diagnosis target URL of the web page 1 exists on the web server 103.

  S03: The control unit 2 stores the web page 1 received in S02 in the information storage unit 5. Then, the information analysis unit 4 performs imaging processing (rendering) on the stored information on the web page 1 and displays the information on the information output unit 7 such as a display. A display example of the web page 1 displayed on this display is shown in FIG.

  S04: The information diagnosis unit 6 diagnoses the web page 1. Automatic diagnosis can be performed by a check tool to which the items of the certification standard are applied. In addition, this diagnosis may be performed by a person judging from the display after rendering as shown in FIG. 3 or the source file of the web page 1 and inputting the result from the screen as shown in FIG. But you can. FIG. 4 is an example of a screen for inputting a diagnosis result, and there is a radio button in the determination column so that pass or fail can be selected. Data such as diagnostic items in FIG. 4 is stored in advance in the information storage unit 5 and displayed on a display or the like. Looking at it, a person may input the result from the information input unit 1 such as a mouse or a keyboard.

  The diagnosis result is recorded by the information diagnosis unit 6 in a page diagnosis result database built in the information storage unit 5 in advance. An example of this page diagnosis result database is shown in Table 2.

  Table 2 is a record showing a diagnosis result related to the web page 1. Here, as many diagnosis result records as the number of web pages to be diagnosed described in the diagnosis object database in Table 1 are prepared in the page diagnosis result database, and the results are additionally written. In this page diagnosis result database, item numbers, diagnosis items, and points are assigned in advance, and the determination and score are added after diagnosis.

  Here, although there are n diagnostic items in Table 2, when the condition of each diagnostic item is satisfied, the determination for the item is passed, and when the condition of the diagnostic item is not satisfied, it is rejected. If it passes, the score is added to the score column, and if it fails, the score is 0. The reason why the points are not uniform is that the importance is different for each diagnosis item and the priority is given. The points with high priority are considered important, and the points are assigned 5 points, and the points are assigned 3 points and 1 point as the priority is lowered. In the present embodiment, the scoring is made in three stages of 1, 3, and 5 points. In this way, the same diagnosis is performed for all diagnosis items, and all the scores are added and added to the last line of Table 2. Here, the total score is 52 points.

  S05: It is determined whether or not the web page diagnosed in S04 satisfies the authentication criteria. Specifically, the information diagnosis unit 6 reads and determines the diagnosis result of the web page from the page diagnosis result database. This determination can be made by comparing the total score of the web page calculated in S04 with a pass / fail level stored in the information storage unit 5 in advance. In this embodiment, the pass / fail level is 60 points. That is, when the total score of a web page is 60 points or more, the web page is considered to be acceptable, and when it is less than 60 points, the web page is unacceptable. Therefore, it is determined from the 52 points shown in Table 2 that the web page 1 is rejected.

  In addition, although two types of evaluation is given here by 60 points or more and 60 points or less, this evaluation may be three or more types. For example, the C evaluation may be less than 60 points, the B evaluation may be 60 points or more and less than 80 points, and the A evaluation may be 80 points or more. At this time, if the pass / fail level is 60 points, the A and B evaluations are acceptable and the C evaluation is unacceptable.

  This result is added to the diagnosis target database in Table 1 separately for evaluation and determination. For example, if it is 52 points, it will be rejected by C evaluation, and if it is 88 points, it will pass by A evaluation. When this result is overwritten in the corresponding column of the diagnosis object database in Table 1, the diagnosis object database after diagnosis shown in Table 3 is constructed.

  In Table 3, unlike Table 1, the latest diagnosis date is updated on March 23, 2008 at 10:00. In this way, diagnosis is performed on all diagnosis target web pages stored in the diagnosis target database.

  S06: A website pass / fail determination is made based on the result of the web page pass / fail determination in S05. Usually, a website is composed of a single web page or a plurality of web pages. According to Table 1.2, the website 1 is composed of six web pages 1 to 6. Therefore, the pass / fail determination of the website 1 can be performed by integrating the diagnosis results of the web pages 1 to 6.

  Specifically, first, the information diagnosis unit 6 reads out the total score, determination, evaluation, and the like for each web page from the diagnosis target database of Table 3, and the site diagnosis result built in the information storage unit 5 is read out. Record in the database. An example of this site diagnosis result database is shown in Table 4.

  Table 4 is a record showing the diagnosis result of the website 1. Here, as many diagnosis result records as the number of diagnosis target websites described in the diagnosis target database in Table 1 are prepared in the site diagnosis result database, and the results are additionally written.

  As shown in Table 4, it is assumed that this website 1 is composed of N web pages with page numbers 1 to N. The score of web page 1 with page number 1 is 52 points as shown in the second column, and the score of web page 2 with page number 2 is 80 points. The pass / fail judgment for each web page is shown in the fourth column, and the evaluation is shown in the fifth column.

  By the way, like this website 1, when a website is composed of a plurality of web pages, there are items evaluated by comparing each web page. For example, in the website, the title of the web page is different so that each web page can be easily identified, or the title head is different so that it can be easily distinguished when read by a voice browser Whether it starts with words. These items are called site-specific diagnostic items.

  The diagnosis relating to the site-specific diagnosis item is performed by the information diagnosis unit 6 by reading a plurality of web pages constituting the website from the information storage unit 5 and diagnosing them according to the site-specific diagnosis item. Then, the diagnosis result is recorded in a site-specific diagnosis item database built in advance in the information storage unit 5. Table 5 shows an example of the site-specific diagnostic item database when there are M diagnostic items.

  Table 5 is a record showing the diagnosis result of the website 1. Here, as many diagnosis result records as the number of websites to be diagnosed described in the diagnosis object database in Table 1 are prepared in the site-specific diagnosis item database, and the results are additionally recorded. Here, the total score of the website 1 is 90 points.

  Then, the total score is added to the line of page number 0 of the site diagnosis result database shown in Table 4 by the information diagnosis unit 6, and a pass / fail determination is performed to calculate an evaluation. Here, a score of 90 points is added, and based on this, a pass determination and an A evaluation are calculated and added.

  At this time, in order to treat the results of the website-specific diagnosis items in the same way as the diagnosis results of the web page, normalization is performed so that the highest score of the score of the web page is equal to the score of the website-specific diagnosis. Good. For example, some web pages do not have an image, and even if a diagnosis related to an image is performed on such a web page, the score may not be added, and the total score may be extremely low. In such a case, normalization is effective. Also, since important pages and less important pages can be considered depending on the web page, weighting may be performed using a score. However, ultimately, every page should have an equally good score, so in this embodiment, all points are set to 1.

  After performing the site-specific diagnosis in this manner, the information diagnosis unit 6 reads the website diagnosis result from the site diagnosis result database shown in Table 4 to determine whether the target website is acceptable or not. There are several methods for determining whether a website is acceptable or not.

  First, based on the pass / fail judgment of each web page, there is a method of calculating the total as a score × scoring (1 point here) if it is a pass and 0 points if it is a failure. The total of the web page scores calculated in this way is added to the site diagnosis result database shown in Table 4. In this example, it is assumed that the total is 123456 points. When this is divided by the total number of pages N, an average score per page can be calculated. If this average score is greater than or equal to a preset reference value, this website is accepted, and if it is less than or equal to the reference value, the website is rejected. In this example, as shown in Table 4, the average score is 66 points. Alternatively, looking at the evaluation of the page, A = 5 points, B = 3 points, C = 1 points, etc. may be converted into points and the total may be calculated and compared with the reference value.

  Or you may perform the pass / fail determination of the whole website in consideration of the pass / fail determination result of each web page. For example, in this embodiment, it is assumed that the pass is 756 pages and the failure is 244 pages. At this time, what is necessary is just to make a standard that what percentage of the whole is acceptable. As an example, if the criterion is 60% or more of the whole, this web site 1 is acceptable because 75.6% of all web pages are judged as acceptable. Or it may be that all pages must pass. In that case, the standard may be 100% or more of the whole, and the website 1 is rejected in this embodiment.

  Here, the criterion is 60% or more of the whole, and the website 1 is determined to be acceptable. That is, the web page 1 is rejected with 52 points, but the website 1 to which the web page 1 belongs is acceptable. The reference value can be set as a program threshold value, and is appropriately changed according to the specification.

  Thus, the pass / fail determination of the website is performed, and the result is added to the site determination column of the diagnosis target database shown in Tables 1 and 3.

  S07: The authentication mark of the web page is rewritten based on the pass / fail determination obtained in S06.

  One authentication mark is set for each target web page. This setting is stored in advance in an authentication mark management database built in the information storage unit 5. An example of this authentication mark management database is shown in Table 6.

  As shown in Table 6, the web page 1 with the page number “1” belongs to the website 1 and “ninsyou1.jpg” is set as the target web page mark image. The target web page mark image is unique to each target web page, and image data such as “ninsyu1.jpg” is stored in the information storage unit 5 in advance. The image data is set so that it can be referred to as “http://www.ninsyou.jp/img/ninsyou1.jpg”.

  This authentication mark image is rewritten based on the current diagnosis result. The newly assigned authentication mark is determined by a combination of several diagnostic results. In other words, an authentication mark database is prepared in which possible combinations such as pass / fail judgment of web pages obtained in S05 and S06, evaluation, pass / fail judgment of websites, etc. are created in advance and what kind of authentication mark is used in each case. It is built in the information storage unit 5. An example of this authentication mark database is shown in Table 7. These combinations are added to Table 6.

  According to Table 7, the newly provided authentication mark image is determined by the pass / fail determination of the website, the pass / fail determination of the web page before diagnosis, and the pass / fail determination of the web page after diagnosis. According to the authentication mark management database of Table 6, the determination of the website 1 to which the web page 1 belongs is acceptable, the determination of the web page 1 before diagnosis is acceptable, and the determination of the web page 1 after diagnosis is unacceptable. Therefore, the newly assigned authentication mark image is “Bad1.jpg”. Therefore, the information diagnosis unit 6 overwrites the image data “Bad1.jpg” on the image data “ninsyou1.jpg” stored in the information storage unit 5.

  Here, an example of the HTML source of the web page 1 is shown in FIG. In this HTML source, <img source = “http://www.ninsyou.jp/img/ninsyu1.jpg” alt = “diagnosis result” width = “196” height = “52”> at the end of the BODY element is described. This designates that an image is displayed, and the image file is “http://www.ninsyou.jp/img/ninsyou1.jpg”. Therefore, “http://www.ninsyou.jp/img/ninsyou1.jpg” is displayed on the web page 1 as an authentication mark image.

  Here, specific examples of the authentication mark image are shown in FIGS. FIG. 6 is an example of the image “Good1.jpg”. Before the pass / fail judgment of this time, “ninsyou1.jpg” was overwritten with the contents of “Good1.jpg”, so the image shown in FIG. 6 was displayed. . However, since the contents of “Bad1.jpg” are overwritten after the current pass / fail determination, the contents of “ninsyou1.jpg” are the same as “Bad1.jpg”. Accordingly, the image shown in FIG. 7 is displayed on the web page 1 after the current pass / fail determination.

  At this time, a diagnosis date and time may be acquired from a system clock (not shown) in the authentication mark control apparatus 101 or the timer 8, and an image may be generated and displayed so as to be included in the authentication mark image. Alternatively, additional information such as a diagnostician and a tool used for diagnosis may be embedded. Examples of authentication mark images to which these additional information are added are shown in FIGS. Alternatively, a message including information such as a diagnosis date and time, a diagnostic person, and a tool used for diagnosis may be created without recreating a new image. This message may be described on the same web page as the authentication mark, or a link may be set to the authentication mark, and a linked web page may be created and described there.

  Further, as described in the process of S06, since the pass / fail of the entire website can also be determined, an authentication mark or the like of the entire website may be displayed on the web page based on this. Alternatively, the authentication mark for the entire website and the authentication mark for the web page may be displayed side by side. When displaying the authentication mark of the entire website, referring to Table 6, the authentication marks of the web pages 2 to 6 belonging to the same website 1 as the web page 1 may be changed.

  S08: It is checked whether or not the pass / fail judgment result of S06 has changed. Specifically, the information diagnosis unit 6 reads the pass / fail determination result of each web page from the authentication mark management database of Table 6, and compares the pass / fail determination result before diagnosis with the pass / fail determination result after diagnosis. Add the change. In this embodiment, as shown in Table 6, for web page 1, the pass / fail determination result before diagnosis and the pass / fail determination result after diagnosis are different, so “Yes” is added to the column of presence / absence of change.

  S09: When there is a change in the pass / fail judgment result in S06, the creator of the web page 1 is notified of the change in the pass / fail judgment result. When there is a change from pass to fail as in the present embodiment, the web page 1 creator is requested to correct the web page. On the contrary, when it is changed from fail to pass, the fact is notified. Specifically, the text of the e-mail and the e-mail address of the creator of each web page are stored in the information storage unit 5 in advance, and these are edited by the e-mail software or the like in the control unit 2, What is necessary is just to transmit to a producer's computer via the transmission / reception part 3.

  In this way, the web page is automatically diagnosed by a check tool or the like at a predetermined time by the timer 8, and the authentication mark displayed on the web page is changed to reflect the result. Sexuality is enhanced. Since the diagnosis result is transmitted to the creator's computer, the web creator can quickly modify the web content, and the web content in consideration of universal design is spread.

(3) Example 2
In the present embodiment, the authentication mark control apparatus 101 diagnoses the web page updated by the creator immediately before publishing on the web, and controls the web page authentication mark according to the diagnosis result. Here, the authentication mark image data is stored in advance on the web server 103 for web publication. Hereinafter, the operation of the authentication mark control apparatus 101 in the present embodiment will be described based on the flowchart of FIG.

  S11: The authentication mark control apparatus 101 confirms whether there is a request for issuing an authentication mark. That is, when the web creator wants to update and publish the web page 1, the web creator copies the updated web page 1 to the web server 103 for web publication. At that time, the web creator requests the authentication mark control apparatus 101 to issue an authentication mark. At the time of this request, the URL and contact information of the updated web page 1 are transmitted from the web creator's terminal (for example, a personal computer) to the authentication mark control apparatus 101 via the network 102. When the control part 2 confirms the reception of these, the authentication mark control apparatus 101 determines that an authentication mark is issued and proceeds to S12.

  S12: The control unit 2 communicates with the web server 103 storing the web page 1 through the transmission / reception unit 3 and the network 102, and receives the updated web page 1.

  S13 to S15: The web page 1 received in S12 is diagnosed by the information diagnosis unit 6 or rendered and displayed on a display or the like in the same manner as S03 to S06 in the first embodiment. A person diagnoses the web page 1 and determines whether the web page 1 is acceptable. Here, as a result of the determination, it is assumed that the web page 1 has failed, and the authentication mark given in the case of failure is set to “Bad.jpg”.

  S16: Rewrite the authentication mark of the target web page. Here, the authentication mark control apparatus 101 rewrites the description regarding the image information in the HTML file stored in the web server 103. At this time, the authentication mark control apparatus 101 is given the authority to update the HTML file stored in the web server 13. This authority is deleted when the rewriting of the HTML file is completed.

  Here, an example of the HTML source of the web page 1 stored in the web server 103 is shown in FIG. In this HTML source, <img source = “NINSYOU-IMAGE” alt = “diagnosis result” width = “196” height = “52”> is described at the end of the BODY element. This indicates that the image file is “NINSYOU-IMAGE”. This “NINSYOU-IMAGE” is a replacement word (variable). The web creator describes the predetermined replacement word (variable) by embedding it in the HTML source of the web page 1 to be diagnosed. The authentication mark control apparatus 101 rewrites this variable. Specifically, the control unit 2 accesses the HTML file in the web server 13 via the transmission / reception unit 3 and the network 102, and sets the variable “NINSYO-IMAGE” to “Bad.jpg” according to the pass / fail judgment result of S15. To "". In addition, just before the sentence, <p> This web page has a universal design issue, but it is currently being corrected. Add a sentence </ p>.

  As a result, at the end of web page 1, the text “This web page has a problem with universal design, but it is currently being corrected.” And an authentication mark image indicating failure as shown in FIGS. 7 and 9 are displayed. Is displayed.

  At this time, as shown in FIG. 9, an authentication mark image to which the pass / fail determination date / time is added may be used. In this case, the file name may be, for example, “Bad200880312.jpg”. Furthermore, the “diagnosis result” that is the content of the “alt” attribute may be rewritten to be “Web authentication mark: Web being modified” or the like. These rewritings are possible using text pattern matching technology.

  Also, if the pass / fail judgment result is acceptable, for example, <p> This web page has no problem as a result of the universal design pass / fail judgment. A sentence such as </ p> may be added.

  In this way, by making a diagnosis immediately before publishing the updated web page by the web producer, the authentication mark can be changed to the latest diagnosis result, and the reliability of the authentication mark is improved.

  If this diagnosis result is transmitted to the web creator's computer, the web creator can easily confirm whether the content update satisfies the universal design certification standard. Therefore, if the updated content does not meet the universal design certification standard, the web creator can quickly correct it. In this respect as well, web contents that take universal design into account are disseminated.

(4) Example 3
In this embodiment, the authentication mark control apparatus 101 diagnoses a web page immediately before being viewed by a web viewer, and controls the web page authentication mark according to the diagnosis result. Here, the authentication mark image data is stored in advance on the web server 103 for web publication. Hereinafter, the operation of the authentication mark control apparatus 101 in the present embodiment will be described based on the flowchart shown in FIG.

  S21: The authentication mark control apparatus 101 confirms whether a web browsing request has been made to the web server 103 from the terminal 105 of the web browser.

  That is, when the web browser PC 105 requests the web server 103 to browse the web page 1, the web server 103 sends the URL of the web page 1 requested to be browsed via the network 102 to the authentication mark. Transmit to the control device 101. When the control unit 2 confirms this, the authentication mark control apparatus 101 determines that there is a web browsing request and proceeds to S22.

  S22: The control unit 2 communicates with the web server 13 storing the web page 1 via the transmission / reception unit 3 and the network 102, and receives the web page 1 requested to be browsed.

  S23 to S26: The web page 1 received in S22 is diagnosed by the information diagnosis unit 6 or rendered and displayed on a display or the like in the same manner as S13 to S16 in the second embodiment. A person diagnoses the web page 1, determines whether the web page 1 is acceptable, and rewrites the authentication mark of the target web page.

  In this way, by performing a diagnosis of the web page immediately before the web viewer browses the web page, it can be changed to an authentication mark based on the latest diagnosis result. Therefore, the web browser can browse the content to which the pass / fail judgment result reflecting the latest diagnosis result is given.

  In addition, this invention is not limited to the said embodiment, For example, it can also be comprised in the program which functions a computer as each part 1-8 which comprises the authentication mark control apparatus 101, for example.

  In this case, the processing unit (for example, CPU) of the computer reads the program code, and the processes S01 to S09, S11 to S16, and S21 to S26 of each embodiment are executed. This program code is stored in a recording medium such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD + R, DVD + RW, MO, HDD, and provided to a computer. The program may be downloaded from an Internet site and provided to a computer.

The block diagram of the authentication mark control apparatus which concerns on embodiment of this invention. The processing flow figure of the Example 1. FIG. Screen display example of the diagnosis target web page. Display example of the same diagnostic result input screen. The example of the HTML source of the web page for diagnosis of the same Example 1. The example of the certification mark showing the same pass. An example of the certification mark indicating the same failure. An application example of the certification mark indicating the same pass. Application example of the certification mark indicating the same failure. The processing flow figure of the Example 2. FIG. The example of the HTML source of the web page for diagnosis of the same Example 2. The processing flow figure of the Example 3. FIG.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Information input part 2 ... Control part 3 ... Transmission / reception part 4 ... Information analysis part 5 ... Information storage part (information storage means)
6 ... Information diagnosis section (diagnosis means)
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 7 ... Information output part 8 ... Timer 101 ... Authentication mark control apparatus 102 ... Network 103, 104 ... Web server 105 ... Web viewer PC

Claims (10)

An authentication mark control device that diagnoses content on the web via a network and assigns an authentication mark according to the diagnosis result to the content,
Diagnosing means for diagnosing the content according to any preset authentication criteria;
An authentication mark control apparatus, wherein the diagnosis unit can diagnose the content a plurality of times and rewrite the authentication mark according to each diagnosis result.   The authentication mark control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the authentication standard is a universal design authentication standard. The authentication mark control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the diagnosis unit periodically diagnoses the content according to a preset schedule. The diagnostic means, when an update of the content with the authentication mark is published,
3. The authentication mark control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the update content is diagnosed before publication. The diagnostic means, when a viewer browses the content provided with the authentication mark,
The authentication mark control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the content is diagnosed before browsing by a viewer. When the content is a website having a plurality of pages,
6. The authentication mark control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a diagnosis result is determined for each page. When the content is a website having a plurality of pages,
The authentication mark control apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein a diagnosis result of the website is determined by integrating a diagnosis result of each page. It further comprises information storage means for storing the diagnostic results of the contents in time series,
When the diagnostic unit is different from the diagnostic result of the content and the previous diagnostic result stored in the information storage unit,
The authentication mark control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the authentication mark is rewritten. The authentication mark control apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the diagnosis unit describes a previous diagnosis result stored in the information storage unit in the authentication mark.   An authentication mark control program that causes a computer to function as the authentication mark control apparatus according to claim 1.

Images