JP2001340894A - Advanced treatment method for leachate at landfill - Google Patents
Advanced treatment method for leachate at landfillInfo
- Publication number
- JP2001340894A JP2001340894A JP2000164994A JP2000164994A JP2001340894A JP 2001340894 A JP2001340894 A JP 2001340894A JP 2000164994 A JP2000164994 A JP 2000164994A JP 2000164994 A JP2000164994 A JP 2000164994A JP 2001340894 A JP2001340894 A JP 2001340894A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- treatment
- activated carbon
- leachate
- landfill
- liquid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W10/00—Technologies for wastewater treatment
- Y02W10/10—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
Landscapes
- Biological Treatment Of Waste Water (AREA)
- Treatment Of Water By Oxidation Or Reduction (AREA)
- Water Treatment By Sorption (AREA)
Abstract
(57)【要約】
【課題】 運転にかかるコストが低廉で経済性に優れ、
しかも、ダイオキシン等の生物難分解性有機汚濁成分を
含む原水を、無害な炭酸ガス、水、窒素にまで完全に分
解処理でき、容易にCOD値が10mg/l以下の処理
水が得られる埋立処分場浸出水に対する高度処理方法を
提供すること。
【解決手段】 生物難分解性有機汚濁成分を含む埋立処
分場浸出水に対して少なくとも活性汚泥による生物処理
した後に行なう高度処理方法において、過酸化水素とオ
ゾンとを併用して処理した後、更に、処理した液を生物
活性炭からなる濾床に通水して処理し、その後に、得ら
れた処理液を活性炭吸着処理することを特徴とする埋立
処分場浸出水に対する高度処理方法。
(57) [Summary] [Problem] The cost of operation is low and economical,
In addition, landfill that can completely decompose raw water containing biorefractory organic pollutants such as dioxin into harmless carbon dioxide, water and nitrogen, and easily obtain treated water with a COD value of 10 mg / l or less To provide an advanced treatment method for field leachate. SOLUTION: In an advanced treatment method performed after at least biological treatment with activated sludge on leachate of a landfill containing an organic pollutant that is hardly biodegradable, after treating with hydrogen peroxide and ozone together, An advanced treatment method for leachate at a landfill, wherein the treated liquid is passed through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon for treatment, and then the obtained treated liquid is subjected to activated carbon adsorption treatment.
Description
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、生物難分解性有機
汚濁成分を含む埋立処分場浸出水に対する高度処理方法
に関する。TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to an advanced treatment method for leachate of a landfill containing an organic pollutant which is hardly degradable.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】近年、埋立処分場は、産業廃棄物や一般
廃棄物の最終処分場として利用されており、有機成分の
多い直接埋立は減少し、埋立処分されるものの大半は、
可燃ゴミを焼却処理した焼却残渣である。焼却残渣(焼
却灰)は、焼却温度によっても異なるが、焼却処理によ
ってダイオキシン等の有害な有機塩素化合物が発生し、
これが焼却灰中に含まれる場合がある。更に、そのまま
埋め立てられる不燃ゴミや汚泥中にも、近年の材料の多
様化に伴って多種多様の成分が含まれているため、埋立
処分場からの浸出水中には、ダイオキシン類を始めとす
る種々の生物難分解性の有機汚濁成分が含有されてい
る。このように、近年における埋立処分場浸出水は、従
来のものと水質が変化してきており、かかる浸出水の水
質の変化に伴って、従来の浸出水の処理方法では対応で
きなくなってきている。一方で、ダイオキシン類等の生
物難分解性の有機汚濁成分によってもたらされる環境汚
染、人体への影響は重大であり、完全な処理が望まれ
る。従って、これらの問題の発生を未然に防止すべく、
埋立処分場浸出水に対する完全で経済的な処理方法の開
発が待望されている。2. Description of the Related Art In recent years, landfill sites have been used as final disposal sites for industrial waste and general waste.
Incineration residue from incineration of combustible waste. The incineration residue (incineration ash) varies depending on the incineration temperature, but harmful organic chlorine compounds such as dioxin are generated by incineration,
This may be included in the incineration ash. Furthermore, since non-combustible garbage and sludge that can be landfilled contain a wide variety of components due to the diversification of materials in recent years, leachate from landfills contains various types of dioxins and other dioxins. Contains a biodegradable organic pollutant. As described above, in recent years, the leachate of a landfill disposal site has changed in water quality from the conventional leachate, and with the change in leachate water quality, the conventional leachate treatment method has become unable to cope. On the other hand, environmental pollution and the effect on human bodies brought about by biodegradable organic pollutants such as dioxins are serious, and complete treatment is desired. Therefore, in order to prevent these problems from occurring,
There is a need for the development of a complete and economical treatment method for landfill leachate.
【0003】通常、埋立処分場からの浸出水は、放流水
質まで、浸出水中の有機物、SS、重金属等を除去すべ
く、物理的、化学的、生物学的処理が加えられている。
例えば、可燃ゴミを主体とする埋立処分場では、活性汚
泥法等の生物処理を主体とし、易生物分解性の有機物を
処理した後、膜処理法や活性炭吸着法等の物理化学的方
法によって高度処理して、生物分解されない汚染物質を
除去している。しかし、これらの物理化学的方法では、
濃縮廃水や汚染された吸着材等の二次廃棄物を発生した
り、ダイオキシン類等の生物難分解性有機汚濁成分を完
全に除去するにはコストがかかるという問題がある。[0003] Usually, leachate from a landfill is subjected to physical, chemical and biological treatments to remove organic substances, SS, heavy metals and the like in the leachate up to the quality of discharged water.
For example, in landfills mainly composed of combustible waste, biological treatment such as the activated sludge method is mainly used, and organic substances that are easily biodegradable are treated, and then advanced by physicochemical methods such as the membrane treatment method and activated carbon adsorption method. Treatment to remove non-biodegradable contaminants. However, with these physicochemical methods,
There is a problem that it is costly to generate secondary waste such as concentrated wastewater and contaminated adsorbents, and to completely remove biorefractory organic pollutants such as dioxins.
【0004】これに対し、廃水の高度処理として、オゾ
ンを用いた酸化法が種々に検討されている(水処理技
術、Vol.33 No.6 1992、p273〜2
88)。オゾンを使用する主たる目的は、有機物の酸化
・安定化、有毒・有害物の無害化、有機塩素化合物の生
成抑制等にある。又、オゾンは、非常に強い酸化力を有
する反面、有機化合物に対する酸化作用は選択的であ
り、有機化合物中の二重或いは三重結合やベンゼン環等
に作用して飽和或いは開環させるが、通常、これらの有
機化合物を二酸化炭素や水にまで完全に酸化することは
困難であり、オゾン処理後に、アルデヒド、ケトン、カ
ルボン酸のような極性の高い低分子有機化合物が残留す
ることが知られている。On the other hand, as an advanced treatment of wastewater, an oxidation method using ozone has been studied in various ways (water treatment technology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 1992, pp. 273-2).
88). The main purposes of using ozone are to oxidize and stabilize organic substances, detoxify toxic and harmful substances, and suppress the production of organic chlorine compounds. Although ozone has a very strong oxidizing power, it has a selective oxidizing effect on organic compounds, and acts on double or triple bonds or benzene rings in organic compounds to saturate or open rings. It is difficult to completely oxidize these organic compounds to carbon dioxide and water, and it is known that low-molecular organic compounds with high polarity such as aldehydes, ketones, and carboxylic acids remain after ozone treatment. I have.
【0005】オゾンを使用する場合には、オゾン発生装
置を設ける必要があり、その建設費や、運転するための
ランニングコストがかかるという別の問題がある。これ
に対して、出願人は、オゾンを使用することなく、酸化
剤として過酸化水素を用い、且つ、金属触媒の存在下、
酸性条件下で処理することで、生物難分解性有機汚濁成
分を炭酸ガス、水、窒素にまで酸化分解する排水の高度
処理方法を提案している(特公昭59−1118号公
報、特公平5−85240号公報参照)。かかる方法を
埋立処分場浸出水に対する高度処理方法に適用すれば、
難分解性物質を完全に分解でき、しかも、オゾン発生装
置のような特別の装置を使用しないので初期設備にかか
る費用が格段に低減できる。When using ozone, it is necessary to provide an ozone generator, and there is another problem that the construction cost and running cost for operation are high. On the other hand, the applicant uses hydrogen peroxide as an oxidizing agent without using ozone, and in the presence of a metal catalyst,
There has been proposed an advanced treatment method for wastewater which oxidatively decomposes a biodegradable organic pollutant component into carbon dioxide, water, and nitrogen by treating it under acidic conditions (Japanese Patent Publication No. 59-1118, Japanese Patent Publication No. Hei 5-5). -85240). If this method is applied to advanced treatment methods for leachate at landfills,
The hardly decomposable substance can be completely decomposed, and the cost for the initial equipment can be significantly reduced because no special device such as an ozone generator is used.
【0006】[0006]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上記の
方法では、酸性条件下で処理するため、処理後にpH調
整する必要が生じ、更に、金属触媒を用いているためス
ラッジの生成が起こり、これを処理しなければならない
という別の問題が生じる。However, in the above method, since the treatment is carried out under acidic conditions, it is necessary to adjust the pH after the treatment. Further, since a metal catalyst is used, sludge is generated. Another problem arises that must be dealt with.
【0007】これに対して、近年、二次廃棄物の発生が
なく、且つ、生物難分解性有機汚濁成分を効率よく分解
することが可能な各種の促進酸化処理方法が注目されて
いる(産業と環境、1999.9、p86〜91参
照)。かかる方法によれば、非常に酸化力の強いOHラ
ジカルの発生により、水中の汚濁物質は、炭酸イオン、
水、窒素にまで完全に酸化分解される。そして、OHラ
ジカルの発生方法として、オゾン/過酸化水素、オゾン
/紫外線、過酸化水素/紫外線、オゾン/過酸化水素/
紫外線等が知られている。これらは、いずれも処理後に
水若しくは酸素となるので、二次廃棄物を発生しないと
いう長所がある。更に、特に、オゾンを併用する場合
は、脱色、脱臭、殺菌効果も得られる。On the other hand, in recent years, various accelerated oxidation treatment methods that do not generate secondary waste and are capable of efficiently decomposing biologically difficult-to-decompose organic pollutants have attracted attention (industry). And Environment, 1999. 9, p. 86-91). According to this method, the generation of OH radicals having a very strong oxidizing power causes pollutants in the water to contain carbonate ions,
It is completely oxidatively decomposed to water and nitrogen. Ozone / hydrogen peroxide, ozone / ultraviolet rays, hydrogen peroxide / ultraviolet rays, ozone / hydrogen peroxide /
Ultraviolet rays and the like are known. Each of these forms water or oxygen after treatment, and thus has the advantage of not generating secondary waste. Furthermore, when ozone is used in combination, decoloring, deodorizing and sterilizing effects are also obtained.
【0008】しかし、上記したような促進酸化処理方法
によって廃水の高度処理を完全に行なうには、その初期
設備にかかるコストはもとより、多大なランニングコス
トがかかり、経済性に劣るという別の問題がある。経済
性の問題は、連続して処理する必要があり、しかも、廃
棄物に起因して生じる埋立処分場浸出水に対しての処理
コストであるので、非常に重要である。However, in order to completely perform advanced treatment of wastewater by the above-mentioned accelerated oxidation treatment method, there is another problem that not only costs for initial equipment but also large running costs and economical inefficiency are required. is there. The problem of economics is very important because it requires continuous treatment and the treatment cost for landfill leachate resulting from waste.
【0009】従って、本発明の目的は、運転にかかるコ
ストが低廉で経済性に優れ、しかも、ダイオキシン等の
生物難分解性有機汚濁成分を含む処理水を、無害な炭酸
ガス、水、窒素にまで完全に分解処理でき、容易にCO
D値が10mg/l以下の処理水が得られる埋立処分場
浸出水に対する高度処理方法を提供することにある。Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to reduce the cost of operation and to be economical, and to convert treated water containing a biodegradable organic pollutant such as dioxin into harmless carbon dioxide gas, water and nitrogen. Up to CO2
It is an object of the present invention to provide an advanced treatment method for leachate at a landfill disposal site from which treated water having a D value of 10 mg / l or less can be obtained.
【0010】[0010]
【課題を解決するための手段】上記の目的は、下記の本
発明によって達成される。即ち、本発明は、生物難分解
性有機汚濁成分を含む埋立処分場浸出水に対して少なく
とも活性汚泥による生物処理した後に行なう高度処理方
法において、過酸化水素とオゾンとを併用して処理した
後、更に、処理した液を生物活性炭からなる濾床に通水
して処理し、その後に、得られた処理液を活性炭吸着処
理することを特徴とする埋立処分場浸出水に対する高度
処理方法である。The above objects are achieved by the present invention described below. That is, the present invention relates to an advanced treatment method performed after at least biological treatment with activated sludge on landfill leachate containing a biodegradable organic pollutant component, after the treatment using a combination of hydrogen peroxide and ozone. Further, the method is an advanced treatment method for leachate at a landfill disposal site, wherein the treated liquid is passed through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon to be treated, and then the obtained treated liquid is subjected to activated carbon adsorption treatment. .
【0011】[0011]
【発明の実施の形態】本発明の好ましい実施の形態を挙
げて本発明を詳細に説明する。本発明者らは、上記した
従来技術の問題点を解決すべく鋭意研究の結果、生物難
分解性有機汚濁成分を含む埋立処分場浸出水を処理する
場合に、活性汚泥による生物処理した後、先ず、過酸化
水素とオゾンとを併用して処理し、更に、処理した液を
生物活性炭からなる濾床に通水して処理し、その後に活
性炭吸着処理すれば、埋立処分場浸出水中に含まれてい
る生物難分解性有機汚濁成分を容易に、ほぼ完全に、無
害な炭酸ガス、水、窒素にまで酸化分解することがで
き、しかも上記の方法によれば、そのランニングコスト
を格段に低減できることを知見して本発明に至った。DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention will be described in detail with reference to preferred embodiments of the present invention. The present inventors have conducted intensive research to solve the above-described problems of the prior art, and as a result, when treating landfill leachate containing a biodegradable organic pollutant component, after biological treatment with activated sludge, First, hydrogen peroxide and ozone are used together for treatment, and then the treated liquid is passed through a filter bed made of biologically activated carbon for treatment. Easily and almost completely oxidatively decompose organic harmful organic pollutants to harmless carbon dioxide, water and nitrogen. According to the above method, the running cost is significantly reduced. The inventors have found that the present invention can be achieved, and have reached the present invention.
【0012】本発明者らが検討を行なった結果、前記し
た従来のいずれの高度処理方法においても、活性炭吸着
処理による脱色、脱臭等の最終処理が行なわれている
が、いずれの場合も、最終処理における活性炭の吸着効
率が悪く、頻繁に活性炭を交換する必要が生じ、しか
も、汚染された二次廃棄物が大量に出されるため、この
最終処理に対する経済的な負荷が問題であることがわか
った。そこで、本発明者らは、この活性炭吸着処理にか
かっている多大なコストを低減できれば、高度処理全体
にかかるコストの削減に大きく寄与できると考え、最終
的な活性炭吸着処理に導入されてくる液の性状について
種々検討を行なった結果、活性炭吸着処理の対象となる
液のCOD値を低く抑えることができ、しかも、活性炭
に吸着され易く、活性炭吸着処理の処理効率を格段に向
上させることのできる活性炭吸着処理に至る迄の処理方
法を見いだした。As a result of the study by the present inventors, in any of the above-mentioned conventional advanced treatment methods, final treatment such as decolorization and deodorization by activated carbon adsorption treatment is performed. The efficiency of adsorption of activated carbon in the treatment is poor, the need for frequent replacement of activated carbon is required, and a large amount of contaminated secondary waste is generated. Was. Therefore, the present inventors believe that if the enormous cost involved in the activated carbon adsorption treatment can be reduced, it can greatly contribute to the reduction of the cost required for the entire advanced treatment, and the liquid introduced into the final activated carbon adsorption treatment is considered. As a result of conducting various studies on the properties of the activated carbon, the COD value of the liquid to be subjected to the activated carbon adsorption treatment can be suppressed to a low level, and the liquid is easily adsorbed by the activated carbon, and the treatment efficiency of the activated carbon adsorption treatment can be remarkably improved. The treatment method up to the activated carbon adsorption treatment was found.
【0013】即ち、生物難分解性有機汚濁成分を含む埋
立処分場浸出水に対して活性汚泥による生物処理した処
理液に対して、先ず、過酸化水素とオゾンとを併用して
処理し、更に、処理した液を生物活性炭からなる濾床に
通水し、その後に活性炭吸着処理を行なえば、活性炭吸
着処理の対象となる液のCOD値を20mg/l以下と
低くすることができ、しかも、活性炭の単位あたりに対
するCODの吸着量が、従来の場合と比べて4〜5倍と
多くなり、活性炭の吸着効率が格段に向上することがわ
かった。その理由は定かではないが、生物難分解性有機
汚濁成分を過酸化水素とオゾンとの併用処理すると、か
かる処理で発生するOHラジカルの強い酸化力によって
分解され、その一部が完全に分解されると共に、他は低
分子量の生物分解され易い有機物になる。次に、このよ
うな有機物を含む液を生物活性炭からなる濾床に通水す
れば、活性炭表面に繁殖している有機物分解性微生物に
よって活性炭に吸着された有機物は容易に分解される。
この結果、生物活性炭からなる濾床を通水した後の液
は、COD値が低減され、しかも、残留しているCOD
値で表される成分は、活性炭に格段に吸着され易い性状
のものになるものと考えられる。この結果、活性炭吸着
処理後の最終処理液のCOD値を容易に10mg/l以
下と極めて清浄にできるという顕著な効果が得られる。
以下、本発明の埋立処分場浸出水に対する高度処理方法
の各工程について説明する。That is, first, a treatment liquid obtained by subjecting leachate from a landfill disposal site containing a biodegradable organic pollutant to biological treatment with activated sludge is treated with a combination of hydrogen peroxide and ozone. If the treated liquid is passed through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon and then activated carbon adsorption treatment is performed, the COD value of the liquid to be subjected to activated carbon adsorption treatment can be reduced to 20 mg / l or less, and It was found that the amount of COD adsorbed per unit of activated carbon was 4 to 5 times as large as that in the conventional case, and the adsorption efficiency of activated carbon was significantly improved. Although the reason is not clear, when the biodegradable organic pollutant is treated in combination with hydrogen peroxide and ozone, it is decomposed by the strong oxidizing power of OH radicals generated in such treatment, and a part of it is completely decomposed. At the same time, others become low molecular weight, easily biodegradable organic matter. Next, if the liquid containing such an organic substance is passed through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon, the organic substance adsorbed on the activated carbon by the organic substance decomposing microorganisms growing on the surface of the activated carbon is easily decomposed.
As a result, the liquid after passing through the filter bed made of biologically activated carbon has a reduced COD value, and the remaining COD value
It is considered that the component represented by the value becomes a property that is remarkably easily adsorbed on the activated carbon. As a result, a remarkable effect is obtained in that the COD value of the final treatment liquid after the activated carbon adsorption treatment can be extremely easily reduced to 10 mg / l or less.
Hereinafter, each step of the advanced treatment method for leachate at a landfill disposal site of the present invention will be described.
【0014】本発明の埋立処分場浸出水に対する高度処
理方法では、生物難分解性有機汚濁成分を含む埋立処分
場浸出水を、少なくとも活性汚泥による生物処理した後
の処理液を対象とする。かかる処理液(以下、原水と呼
ぶ)としては、例えば、COD値が50〜300mg/
l、BOD値が1〜50mg/l、総窒素量が1〜60
mg/l、色度が30〜300程度の、生物難分解性有
機汚濁成分を含有するものを対象とする。[0014] The advanced treatment method for leachate of a landfill disposal site according to the present invention is intended for a treatment liquid obtained by subjecting leachate of a landfill disposal site containing a biorefractory organic pollutant to biological treatment with at least activated sludge. As such a treatment liquid (hereinafter referred to as raw water), for example, a COD value of 50 to 300 mg /
l, BOD value is 1-50 mg / l, total nitrogen amount is 1-60
The target is a substance containing a biodegradable organic pollutant having a mg / l and a chromaticity of about 30 to 300.
【0015】かかる原水を、本発明の埋立処分場浸出水
に対する高度処理方法では、先ず、過酸化水素とオゾン
とを併用して処理する。前記したように、かかる処理に
よって、非常に酸化力の強いOHラジカルが発生し、酸
化が促進し、生物難分解性有機汚濁成分の中で酸化され
易い成分については、二酸化炭素や水にまで完全に分解
する。更に、完全に酸化され難い成分であっても、アル
デヒド、ケトン、カルボン酸といった低分子の生物分解
され易い物質に変化する。[0015] In the advanced treatment method for leachate of a landfill disposal site according to the present invention, such raw water is first treated using both hydrogen peroxide and ozone. As described above, OH radicals having extremely strong oxidizing power are generated by such a treatment, and oxidation is promoted. As for easily oxidizable components among the organic pollutants which are hardly decomposable, even carbon dioxide and water are completely eliminated. Decompose into Furthermore, even components that are difficult to completely oxidize are converted into low molecular weight biodegradable substances such as aldehydes, ketones, and carboxylic acids.
【0016】本発明では、この際、オゾン発生機によっ
て発生させた後、均一にしたオゾンを使用することが好
ましい。その使用量としては、原水1リットル当たりオ
ゾンが1〜60mg/分程度の速度で送り込めばよい。
更に、この際、原水中に過酸化水素を加えて撹拌しなが
ら反応させる。過酸化水素の濃度は、原水の性状にもよ
るが、原水1リットル当たり、35%過酸化水素液とし
て0.03〜0.22ミリリットル(酸素原子として5
〜40mg/l)程度を加えればよい。本発明において
は、後述するように、次に行なう生物活性炭からなる濾
床による処理の際に充分な酸素が必要であり、このため
には、添加する過酸化水素の量を多めにすることが好ま
しい。即ち、多めに添加して過酸化水素が処理後に残留
するように構成すれば、生物活性炭からなる濾床に通水
させた場合に必要な酸素の供給源となる。この場合に残
存する量が、酸素として2〜10mg/lとなるように
することが好ましい。尚、これに限定されず、生物活性
炭からなる濾床に通水する前に、新たに過酸化水素を添
加してもよい。上記の過酸化水素とオゾンとの併用処理
方法によって、上記した原水は酸化処理されて、COD
値が20〜200mg/l、BOD値が1〜30mg/
l、総窒素量が1〜60mg/l、色度が10〜100
程度の性状のものとなる。In the present invention, it is preferable to use ozone generated by an ozone generator and then made uniform. As the usage amount, ozone may be sent at a rate of about 1 to 60 mg / min per liter of raw water.
Further, at this time, hydrogen peroxide is added to the raw water and reacted while stirring. The concentration of hydrogen peroxide depends on the properties of the raw water, but is 0.03 to 0.22 ml as a 35% hydrogen peroxide solution (5% as oxygen atoms) per liter of raw water.
(About 40 mg / l). In the present invention, as will be described later, sufficient oxygen is required in the subsequent treatment with a filter bed made of biologically activated carbon. To this end, it is necessary to increase the amount of added hydrogen peroxide. preferable. That is, if a large amount is added so that hydrogen peroxide remains after the treatment, it becomes a necessary oxygen supply source when water is passed through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon. In this case, it is preferable that the amount remaining is 2 to 10 mg / l as oxygen. The present invention is not limited to this, and hydrogen peroxide may be newly added before water is passed through the filter bed made of biological activated carbon. The raw water described above is oxidized by the above-described combined treatment method of hydrogen peroxide and ozone, and COD
20-200 mg / l, BOD value 1-30 mg / l
1, total nitrogen amount is 1 to 60 mg / l, chromaticity is 10 to 100
It will be of the nature of the degree.
【0017】本発明者らは検討過程で、オゾンを使用せ
ずに、過酸化水素と鉄触媒を用い、pH5以下で、図2
に示したように、上記と同様の原水についての高度処理
を行なった。この結果、上記した過酸化水素とオゾンと
の併用処理の場合よりも、処理水のCOD値、総窒素量
及び色度を低減でき、生物難分解性有機汚濁成分を効率
よく分解できることが確認できた。しかし、pHの値を
5以下として処理するので、次の処理に移行するために
は中和処理が必要であり、又、鉄触媒に起因するスラッ
ジが発生するためスラッジを沈澱及び除去することが必
要となった(図2参照)。更に、その後に最終的に活性
炭吸着処理を行なった場合に、残留するCOD値で表さ
れる成分に対する活性炭吸着効率は低く、最終的な処理
水のCOD値を10mg/l以下とするためには活性炭
を頻繁に交換しなければならないことがわかった。この
結果、オゾン発生機を必要としないので初期設備にかか
るコストを削減できるものの、高度処理にかかる総コス
トを考えた場合には、最適な方法とは言えないことがわ
かった。In the course of the investigation, the inventors of the present invention did not use ozone, but used hydrogen peroxide and an iron catalyst at a pH of 5 or less.
As shown in the above, advanced treatment was performed on raw water in the same manner as above. As a result, it can be confirmed that the COD value, the total nitrogen amount, and the chromaticity of the treated water can be reduced, and the biodegradable organic pollutant can be decomposed more efficiently than in the case of the above-described combined treatment of hydrogen peroxide and ozone. Was. However, since the treatment is carried out at a pH value of 5 or less, a neutralization treatment is required in order to proceed to the next treatment, and sludge due to the iron catalyst is generated. Required (see FIG. 2). Furthermore, when the activated carbon adsorption treatment is finally performed thereafter, the activated carbon adsorption efficiency for the component represented by the remaining COD value is low, and in order to make the final treated water COD value 10 mg / l or less, It turned out that the activated carbon had to be changed frequently. As a result, it was found that although the ozone generator was not required, the cost for the initial equipment could be reduced, but it could not be said to be the optimal method considering the total cost for advanced treatment.
【0018】又、前記した過酸化水素とオゾンとの併用
処理によって原水中の生物難分解性有機汚濁成分を完全
に除去しようとすると、長時間の処理を要し、大量のオ
ゾンが必要となる。更に、上記の方法と同様に、その後
に活性炭吸着処理を行なう場合に、残留するCOD値は
上記の方法よりも高く、又、COD値で表される成分の
活性炭吸着効率は上記の場合と同様に低く、最終的な処
理水のCOD値を10mg/l以下とするためには活性
炭を頻繁に交換する必要がある、やはり経済的ではない
ことがわかった。Further, if it is intended to completely remove the biodegradable organic pollutants in the raw water by the combined use of hydrogen peroxide and ozone as described above, a long time treatment is required and a large amount of ozone is required. . Further, similarly to the above method, when the activated carbon adsorption treatment is performed thereafter, the remaining COD value is higher than that of the above method, and the activated carbon adsorption efficiency of the component represented by the COD value is the same as in the above case. In order to reduce the COD value of the final treated water to 10 mg / l or less, it is necessary to frequently change the activated carbon, which is not economical.
【0019】これに対し、本発明では、図1に示したよ
うに、上記した程度の過酸化水素とオゾンとの併用処理
を行なった後、更に、処理した液を生物活性炭からなる
濾床に通水して処理することを特徴とする。かかる方法
によれば、通水後の液のCOD値を低減でき、しかも、
生物活性炭表面で、吸着された成分の微生物による分解
が行なわれるため、通水後に残留するCOD値で表され
る成分の活性炭吸着効率が格段に向上することがわかっ
た。この結果、最終的な活性炭吸着処理を行なった場合
に、処理水のCOD値を10mg/l以下にすることが
容易となる(図1参照)。On the other hand, in the present invention, as shown in FIG. 1, after the above-described combined treatment of hydrogen peroxide and ozone is performed, the treated liquid is further passed through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon. It is characterized by passing water for treatment. According to this method, the COD value of the liquid after passing water can be reduced, and
Since the adsorbed component is decomposed by the microorganism on the surface of the biological activated carbon, it has been found that the activated carbon adsorption efficiency of the component represented by the COD value remaining after passing water is significantly improved. As a result, when the final activated carbon adsorption treatment is performed, it becomes easy to reduce the COD value of the treated water to 10 mg / l or less (see FIG. 1).
【0020】本発明で使用する生物活性炭とは、活性炭
の表面に活性汚泥のような有機物分解性微生物を繁殖さ
せ、活性炭に吸着された有機汚濁物質を上記有機物分解
性微生物によって分解し、活性炭の吸着能力を再生及び
持続させるものである。この生物活性炭を用いれば、そ
の機構は不明であるが、活性炭粒子の表面に繁殖した有
機物分解性微生物が、活性炭との相乗効果によって生物
難分解性有機物をも分解できることが知られている。本
発明において、生物活性炭の濾床を通水させた場合に、
最終的な活性炭吸着処理の効率を上昇できる理由は明確
ではないが、生物難分解性有機汚濁成分が、先ず、オゾ
ン及び過酸化水素によって分解されて低分子の有機物と
なり、これが生物活性炭の濾床に通水されると、更に活
性炭の表面の有機物分解性微生物により生物分解され、
この結果、活性炭に物理吸着され易いものになったと考
えられる。The biological activated carbon used in the present invention means that organic matter-degrading microorganisms such as activated sludge are propagated on the surface of activated carbon, and the organic pollutants adsorbed on the activated carbon are decomposed by the organic matter-degrading microorganism, and the activated carbon is decomposed. It regenerates and maintains the adsorption capacity. Although the mechanism of this biological activated carbon is unknown, it is known that organic matter degrading microorganisms propagated on the surface of activated carbon particles can also decompose biodegradable organic matter by a synergistic effect with activated carbon. In the present invention, when a filter bed of biological activated carbon is passed through,
It is not clear why the efficiency of the final activated carbon adsorption treatment can be increased, but the biodegradable organic pollutants are first decomposed by ozone and hydrogen peroxide to low-molecular organic substances, which are filtered through the bioactive carbon filter. When water is passed through, it is further biodegraded by organic matter degrading microorganisms on the surface of activated carbon,
As a result, it is considered that the material was easily physically adsorbed to the activated carbon.
【0021】生物活性炭処理では、有機物汚濁物質が多
量に含有されている場合は、濾床を形成する生物活性炭
に吸着された有機汚濁物質及びそこで繁殖する微生物に
よって濾床中に膜が形成されて濾床に目詰まりが生じた
り、又、微生物の大量繁殖による排水中の溶存酸素の低
下によって、濾床内に嫌気性部分を生じたりすることが
ある。このため、生物活性炭濾床に十分な酸素を供給す
る必要がある。本発明では、生物活性炭処理の前に、生
物処理、及び、オゾンと過酸化水素との併用処理を行な
っているので、有機物汚濁物質の量は減少しており、更
に、先に述べたように、通水させる液中に過酸化水素が
残留するように構成してあれば、過酸化水素が生物活性
炭粒子の表面の微生物の酸素源になるので、特に曝気す
る必要はない。しかし、残留している有機物汚濁物質の
濃度等によって、或いは、浄化処理をより完全にするた
めには、更に、生物活性炭からなる濾床に通水して処理
する処理液の少なくとも一部を曝気する過程を設け、そ
の後、曝気した液を生物活性炭からなる濾床に通水して
処理することが好ましい。又、生物活性炭からなる濾床
に通水する際に循環処理して、処理液が複数回、濾床を
通過するようにしてもよい(図1参照)。In the biological activated carbon treatment, when a large amount of organic pollutants is contained, a film is formed in the filter bed by the organic pollutants adsorbed on the biological activated carbon forming the filter bed and the microorganisms propagating there. The filter bed may be clogged, or an anaerobic portion may be formed in the filter bed due to a decrease in dissolved oxygen in the wastewater due to the large propagation of microorganisms. Therefore, it is necessary to supply sufficient oxygen to the biological activated carbon filter bed. In the present invention, the biological treatment and the combined treatment of ozone and hydrogen peroxide are performed before the biological activated carbon treatment, so that the amount of the organic pollutants is reduced. If hydrogen peroxide remains in the liquid to be passed, the hydrogen peroxide becomes a source of oxygen for microorganisms on the surface of the bioactive carbon particles, so that it is not necessary to perform aeration. However, depending on the concentration of the remaining organic pollutants, or in order to complete the purification treatment, at least a part of the treatment liquid to be treated by passing water through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon is further aerated. After that, it is preferable that the aerated liquid is passed through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon for treatment. In addition, when the water is passed through a filter bed made of biologically activated carbon, a circulation treatment may be performed so that the treatment liquid passes through the filter bed a plurality of times (see FIG. 1).
【0022】[0022]
【実施例】次に、実施例及び比較例を挙げて本発明を更
に詳細に説明する。 <実施例1>実施例及び比較例では、表1に示す性状の
可燃ゴミを主体とする埋立処分場からの埋立処分場浸出
水を、通常の活性汚泥法及び生物学的硝化脱窒処理方法
により処理した原水を用いた。表1に、生物処理後の液
の性状も示した。更に、高度処理するための前処理とし
て、第二鉄イオンを250mg/l及び高分子凝集剤1
mg/lを加え、pH4の条件下で凝集処理を行なっ
た。Next, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to Examples and Comparative Examples. <Example 1> In Examples and Comparative Examples, leachate from landfill sites mainly composed of combustible garbage having the properties shown in Table 1 was subjected to ordinary activated sludge method and biological nitrification and denitrification method. Was used. Table 1 also shows the properties of the liquid after the biological treatment. Further, as a pretreatment for advanced treatment, ferric ion was added at 250 mg / l and a polymer flocculant 1
mg / l was added, and aggregation treatment was performed under the condition of pH 4.
【0023】[0023]
【表1】 [Table 1]
【0024】図3に、本実施例で使用した処理装置の概
略を示した。先ず、凝集処理後の処理液を酸化槽に導入
し、下記の条件で過酸化水素とオゾンとの併用処理を行
なった。この際、酸化槽中の液1リットルに対して0.
053mlの割合で過酸化水素を加え、同時に、オゾン
発生機で発生させたオゾンを均一にして、液1リットル
に対して毎分10mgの速度で送り込んだ。処理時間は
15分とした。中和槽でpHを調整した後の処理液の性
状を表2に示した。FIG. 3 schematically shows the processing apparatus used in this embodiment. First, the treatment liquid after the coagulation treatment was introduced into an oxidation tank, and a combined treatment of hydrogen peroxide and ozone was performed under the following conditions. At this time, 0.1 liter per 1 liter of the liquid in the oxidation tank was used.
Hydrogen peroxide was added at a rate of 053 ml, and at the same time, the ozone generated by the ozone generator was made uniform and fed at a rate of 10 mg per minute per liter of liquid. The processing time was 15 minutes. Table 2 shows the properties of the treatment liquid after the pH was adjusted in the neutralization tank.
【0025】次に、上記のようにして過酸化水素とオゾ
ンとの併用処理をした液を、生物活性炭からなる濾床に
通水した。この液について過酸化水素の残留状態を調べ
た結果、酸素として5mg/lの過酸化水素が残留して
いることが確認できた。又、本実施例の場合は、図3に
示したように、過酸化水素とオゾンとの併用処理の後に
pHを調整して中和すると共に、エアーを送って曝気し
た。生物活性炭からなる濾床としては、充填層の高さが
7cmの、直径3cm、高さ40cmの生物活性炭カラ
ムを使用し、4.5ml/分の速度で通水した。上記生
物活性炭濾床を通水後の処理液の性状を表2に示した。Next, the liquid subjected to the combined treatment of hydrogen peroxide and ozone as described above was passed through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon. As a result of examining the residual state of hydrogen peroxide in this liquid, it was confirmed that 5 mg / l of hydrogen peroxide remained as oxygen. In the case of this example, as shown in FIG. 3, after the combined use of hydrogen peroxide and ozone, the pH was adjusted and neutralized, and air was sent for aeration. As the filter bed made of biological activated carbon, a biological activated carbon column having a packed bed height of 7 cm, a diameter of 3 cm and a height of 40 cm was used, and water was passed at a rate of 4.5 ml / min. Table 2 shows the properties of the treated liquid after passing through the biological activated carbon filter bed.
【0026】更に、最終処理として、上記で得られた生
物活性炭濾床の通水後の処理液を活性炭吸着処理をし
た。この際、充填層の高さが7cmの、直径3cm、高
さ40cmの活性炭カラムを使用し、4.5ml/分の
速度で通水した。表2に、この活性炭吸着後の処理液の
性状を示した。この結果、活性炭吸着処理された後の処
理液のCOD値を容易に10mg/l以下とすることが
でき、生物難分解性有機汚濁成分をほぼ完全に分解でき
ることが確認できた。又、最終処理の活性炭吸着処理に
おける吸着量を求めたところ、活性炭1kg当たりCO
Dで換算して0.054kgであり、高い吸着効率を示
した。更に、本実施例の方法で、本実施例で使用した埋
立処分場浸出水を高度処理した場合にかかるランニング
コストを算出した結果、62円/m3と格段に安価な処
理ができることがわかった。Further, as a final treatment, the treated liquid after passing through the biological activated carbon filter bed obtained above was subjected to activated carbon adsorption treatment. At this time, an activated carbon column having a packed bed height of 7 cm, a diameter of 3 cm and a height of 40 cm was used, and water was passed at a rate of 4.5 ml / min. Table 2 shows the properties of the treatment liquid after the adsorption of the activated carbon. As a result, it was confirmed that the COD value of the treatment liquid after the activated carbon adsorption treatment was easily reduced to 10 mg / l or less, and it was confirmed that the biodegradable organic pollutant could be almost completely decomposed. In addition, when the amount of adsorption in the activated carbon adsorption treatment of the final treatment was determined, CO
It was 0.054 kg in terms of D, indicating a high adsorption efficiency. Furthermore, by calculating the running cost when the leachate of the landfill disposal site used in the present example was subjected to advanced treatment by the method of the present example, it was found that the treatment was extremely inexpensive at 62 yen / m 3 . .
【0027】[0027]
【表2】 [Table 2]
【0028】本実施例では、最終処理を行なう活性炭と
して、市販の粒状活性炭ツルミコール GL−30(石
炭系)の商品名で販売されている活性炭を用いた。しか
し、本発明はこれに限定されるものではなく、通常使用
されている他の活性炭や、その他の吸着用活性炭がいず
れを使用してもよい。又、本実施例では、生物活性炭と
して、上記の活性炭に、埋立処分場浸出水を生物処理し
た際に用いた活性汚泥から採取した微生物を接種するこ
とで得られた生物活性炭を用いた。しかし、本発明はこ
れに限定されず、通常の活性炭で濾床を形成し、微生物
を含む埋立処分場浸出水を通水することで活性炭粒子の
表面に微生物を繁殖させたものを生物活性炭として使用
してもよい。このような生物活性炭の濾床に通水する
と、原水が濾床を通過する際に、原水中の有機物が活性
炭に吸着されると共に、活性炭粒子の表面で繁殖してい
る微生物によって好気分解される。この際、その前段の
処理に用いた過酸化水素が残留していれば、活性炭の触
媒作用によって発生期の酸素が放出され、これによる生
物難分解性有機物の分解も起こる。更に、活性炭の触媒
作用によって微生物によっても分解されるので、最終処
理である活性炭吸着に供する液のCOD値及びBOD値
を格段に低下させることができる。In this embodiment, as the activated carbon to be subjected to the final treatment, an activated carbon sold under the trade name of commercially available granular activated carbon Tsurumi Coal GL-30 (coal) was used. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and any other commonly used activated carbon or other activated carbon for adsorption may be used. In this example, as the biological activated carbon, a biological activated carbon obtained by inoculating the above-mentioned activated carbon with a microorganism collected from activated sludge used when the leachate of the landfill disposal site was biologically treated was used. However, the present invention is not limited to this.Biological activated carbon is obtained by forming a filter bed with ordinary activated carbon and allowing microorganisms to propagate on the surface of activated carbon particles by passing leachate from a landfill containing microorganisms. May be used. When water is passed through such a biological activated carbon filter bed, when raw water passes through the filter bed, organic matter in the raw water is adsorbed on the activated carbon and is aerobically decomposed by microorganisms growing on the surface of the activated carbon particles. You. At this time, if the hydrogen peroxide used in the preceding step remains, the nascent oxygen is released by the catalytic action of the activated carbon, and the decomposition of the biodegradable organic matter also occurs. Furthermore, since it is also decomposed by microorganisms by the catalytic action of activated carbon, the COD value and BOD value of the liquid to be subjected to activated carbon adsorption, which is the final treatment, can be significantly reduced.
【0029】<比較例1>図4に、本比較例で使用した
処理装置の概略を示した。実施例1で処理したと同様の
凝集処理後の処理液に対し、過酸化水素と鉄触媒を用
い、pHを3.2として処理を行なった。この際、液1
リットルに対して0.106mlの割合で過酸化水素を
加え、触媒として、液1リットルに対して120mgの
第一鉄イオンを加え、15分間反応させて処理した。次
に、この酸化処理液を中和したが、中和の際に鉄イオン
に起因するスラッジが発生し、そのままの状態では活性
炭吸着処理を行なうことはできなかった。そこで、高分
子凝集剤を1mg/lの割合で添加して凝集ブロックを
成長させた後、沈澱槽にて固液分離し、更に、得られた
上澄み液を濾過カラムに通水してスラッジを除去した。
この際、直径3cm、高さ40cmの濾過カラムを用
い、4.5ml/分の速度で処理液を通水した。その
後、実施例1と同様の活性炭吸着処理を行なった。表3
に、最終の活性炭吸着処理を行なう前後の各処理液の性
状を示した。表3に示したように、本比較例の処理で
は、最終処理水の水質を実施例1と同程度迄にするのは
難しかった。<Comparative Example 1> FIG. 4 schematically shows a processing apparatus used in this comparative example. The treatment liquid after the same aggregation treatment as in Example 1 was treated with hydrogen peroxide and an iron catalyst at a pH of 3.2. At this time, liquid 1
Hydrogen peroxide was added at a rate of 0.106 ml to 1 liter, and as a catalyst, 120 mg of ferrous ion was added to 1 liter of the liquid, and the mixture was reacted for 15 minutes for treatment. Next, the oxidized solution was neutralized. However, sludge caused by iron ions was generated during the neutralization, and the activated carbon adsorption treatment could not be performed as it was. Therefore, a polymer flocculant is added at a rate of 1 mg / l to grow a flocculation block, then solid-liquid separated in a precipitation tank, and the obtained supernatant is passed through a filtration column to remove sludge. Removed.
At this time, the treatment liquid was passed at a rate of 4.5 ml / min using a filtration column having a diameter of 3 cm and a height of 40 cm. Thereafter, the same activated carbon adsorption treatment as in Example 1 was performed. Table 3
The properties of each treatment solution before and after performing the final activated carbon adsorption treatment are shown below. As shown in Table 3, in the treatment of this comparative example, it was difficult to make the quality of the final treated water equal to that of Example 1.
【0030】[0030]
【表3】 [Table 3]
【0031】更に、最終の活性炭吸着処理における吸着
量を求めたところ、活性炭1kg当たり、CODで換算
して0.012kgであり、実施例1の場合と比べると
吸着量が少なく、吸着効率が格段に劣ることがわかっ
た。このため、COD値を10mg/lとするために
は、頻繁に活性炭を交換しなければならなかった。Further, when the amount of adsorption in the final activated carbon adsorption treatment was determined, it was 0.012 kg in terms of COD per 1 kg of activated carbon. The amount of adsorption was smaller than that of Example 1, and the adsorption efficiency was significantly lower. Turned out to be inferior. Therefore, in order to make the COD value 10 mg / l, the activated carbon had to be replaced frequently.
【0032】本比較例の方法で、埋立処分場浸出水を高
度処理した場合にかかるランニングコストを実施例1の
場合と同様に算出した結果、578円/m3であった。
これは実施例1の場合と比較すると、m3当たり9倍以
上のランニングコストがかかることを意味している。本
比較例の場合はオゾンを使用しないので、オゾン発生機
等の初期設備にかかるコストを抑えることができるが、
大量の埋立処分場浸出水を日常的に処理していく場合に
はランニングコストの問題は大きく、経済性を考える上
で大きな障害となることがわかった。According to the method of the present comparative example, the running cost required when the leachate at the landfill site was subjected to advanced treatment was calculated in the same manner as in Example 1, and the result was 578 yen / m 3 .
This means that the running cost is 9 times or more per m 3 as compared with the case of the first embodiment. In the case of this comparative example, since ozone is not used, the cost for initial equipment such as an ozone generator can be suppressed,
The problem of running cost is large when treating a large amount of leachate from a landfill site on a daily basis, which proved to be a major obstacle to economic considerations.
【0033】<比較例2>図5に、本比較例で使用した
処理装置の概略を示した。実施例1で処理したと同様の
原水に対し、生物活性炭からなる濾床に通水する処理を
行なわない以外は実施例1と同様の処理を行なった。表
4に、最終の活性炭吸着処理を行なう前後の各処理液の
性状を示した。その結果、表4に示したように、最終処
理水の水質を実施例1と同程度迄にするのは難しかっ
た。<Comparative Example 2> FIG. 5 schematically shows a processing apparatus used in this comparative example. The same treatment as in Example 1 was performed, except that the same raw water as in Example 1 was not subjected to the treatment of passing water through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon. Table 4 shows the properties of each treatment solution before and after the final activated carbon adsorption treatment. As a result, as shown in Table 4, it was difficult to make the quality of the final treated water equal to that of Example 1.
【0034】[0034]
【表4】 [Table 4]
【0035】又、活性炭吸着処理の吸着量を求めたとこ
ろ、活性炭1kg当たり、CODで換算して0.020
kgであり、実施例1の場合と比べると吸着量が少な
く、吸着効率が格段に劣っていた。このため、COD値
を10mg/lとするためには、頻繁に活性炭を交換し
なければならなかった。更に、本比較例の方法で、埋立
処分場浸出水を高度処理した場合にかかるランニングコ
ストを実施例1の場合と同様に算出した結果、201円
/m3であり比較例1の場合よりもコストを低減できる
ものの、実施例1の場合と比べると3倍程度のランニン
グコストがかかり、大量の埋立処分場浸出水を日常的に
処理した場合には、やはり経済的な負担が大きくなるこ
とがわかった。When the amount of adsorption in the activated carbon adsorption treatment was determined, it was calculated to be 0.020 in terms of COD per kg of activated carbon.
kg, the amount of adsorption was smaller than that of Example 1, and the adsorption efficiency was remarkably inferior. Therefore, in order to make the COD value 10 mg / l, the activated carbon had to be replaced frequently. Furthermore, the running cost required when the leachate at the landfill disposal site was highly treated by the method of the present comparative example was calculated in the same manner as in the case of Example 1. As a result, the running cost was 201 yen / m 3 , which was higher than that of Comparative Example 1. Although the cost can be reduced, the running cost is about three times as large as that of the first embodiment, and when a large amount of leachate from a landfill is treated on a daily basis, the economic burden may increase. all right.
【0036】[0036]
【発明の効果】上記したように、本発明によれば、運転
にかかるコストが低廉で経済性に優れ、しかも、ダイオ
キシン等の生物難分解性有機汚濁成分を含む処理水を、
無害な炭酸ガス、水、窒素にまで完全に分解することが
可能な埋立処分場浸出水に対する高度処理方法が提供さ
れる。又、本発明によれば、活性炭吸着処理にかかるラ
ンニングコストを格段に低減できる結果、高度処理全体
にかかる経済性の達成が実現でき、しかも、活性炭吸着
処理後の最終処理液を容易に、極めて清浄な状態である
COD値10mg/l以下とできるという顕著な効果が
得られる。As described above, according to the present invention, the cost of operation is low, the economy is excellent, and the treated water containing a biodegradable organic pollutant such as dioxin can be used.
Provided is an advanced treatment method for landfill leachate that can completely decompose into harmless carbon dioxide, water and nitrogen. Further, according to the present invention, the running cost of the activated carbon adsorption treatment can be remarkably reduced, so that the economical efficiency of the entire advanced treatment can be achieved, and the final treatment liquid after the activated carbon adsorption treatment can be easily and extremely easily prepared. A remarkable effect is obtained in that the COD value in a clean state can be reduced to 10 mg / l or less.
【図1】本発明の埋立処分場浸出水に対する高度処理方
法の処理フローの一例である。FIG. 1 is an example of a processing flow of an advanced treatment method for leachate at a landfill disposal site of the present invention.
【図2】従来の埋立処分場浸出水に対する高度処理方法
の処理フローの一例である。FIG. 2 is an example of a processing flow of a conventional advanced treatment method for leachate from a landfill.
【図3】実施例1で行なった埋立処分場浸出水に対する
高度処理方法である。FIG. 3 is an advanced treatment method for leachate at a landfill disposal site performed in Example 1.
【図4】比較例1で行なった埋立処分場浸出水に対する
高度処理方法である。FIG. 4 is an advanced treatment method for leachate at a landfill disposal site performed in Comparative Example 1.
【図5】比較例2で行なった埋立処分場浸出水に対する
高度処理方法である。FIG. 5 is an advanced treatment method for leachate at a landfill disposal site performed in Comparative Example 2.
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (51)Int.Cl.7 識別記号 FI テーマコート゛(参考) C02F 9/00 502 C02F 9/00 502R 503 503C 1/28 1/28 D 1/78 ZAB 1/78 ZAB 3/10 3/10 A ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continued on the front page (51) Int.Cl. 7 Identification symbol FI Theme coat ゛ (Reference) C02F 9/00 502 C02F 9/00 502R 503 503C 1/28 1/28 D 1/78 ZAB 1/78 ZAB 3/10 3/10 A
Claims (5)
分場浸出水に対して少なくとも活性汚泥による生物処理
した後に行なう高度処理方法において、過酸化水素とオ
ゾンとを併用して処理した後、更に、処理した液を生物
活性炭からなる濾床に通水して処理し、その後に、得ら
れた処理液を活性炭吸着処理することを特徴とする埋立
処分場浸出水に対する高度処理方法。Claims: 1. An advanced treatment method in which leachate from a landfill containing an organic pollutant that is hardly biodegradable is subjected to biological treatment with at least activated sludge, wherein hydrogen peroxide and ozone are used in combination. Further, an advanced treatment method for leachate from a landfill, wherein the treated liquid is passed through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon to be treated, and then the obtained treated liquid is subjected to activated carbon adsorption treatment.
て処理する処理液の少なくとも一部を曝気し、その後、
曝気した液を生物活性炭からなる濾床に通水して処理す
る過程を有する請求項1に記載の埋立処分場浸出水に対
する高度処理方法。2. Aeration of at least a part of a treatment liquid to be treated by passing water through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon, and thereafter,
The advanced treatment method for leachate from a landfill disposal site according to claim 1, comprising a step of treating the aerated liquid by passing it through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon.
ための対象となる処理液中に少なくとも過酸化水素が2
〜10mg/l(酸素として)含有されている請求項1
又は2に記載の埋立処分場浸出水に対する高度処理方
法。3. A treatment liquid to be subjected to water treatment through a filter bed made of biologically activated carbon contains at least 2 hydrogen peroxide.
2. The composition according to claim 1, which is contained in an amount of from 10 to 10 mg / l (as oxygen).
Or the advanced treatment method for leachate at a landfill disposal site according to 2.
された処理液のCOD値が、20mg/l以下である請
求項1〜3のいずれか1項記載の埋立処分場浸出水に対
する高度処理方法。4. The leachate according to claim 1, wherein a COD value of the treatment liquid treated by passing water through a filter bed made of biological activated carbon is 20 mg / l or less. Advanced processing method.
D値が10mg/l以下である請求項1〜4のいずれか
1項に記載の埋立処分場浸出水に対する高度処理方法。5. The CO of the treatment liquid after the activated carbon adsorption treatment
The advanced treatment method for leachate at a landfill disposal site according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the D value is 10 mg / l or less.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2000164994A JP3495318B2 (en) | 2000-06-01 | 2000-06-01 | Advanced treatment method for landfill leachate |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2000164994A JP3495318B2 (en) | 2000-06-01 | 2000-06-01 | Advanced treatment method for landfill leachate |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2001340894A true JP2001340894A (en) | 2001-12-11 |
| JP3495318B2 JP3495318B2 (en) | 2004-02-09 |
Family
ID=18668538
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2000164994A Expired - Fee Related JP3495318B2 (en) | 2000-06-01 | 2000-06-01 | Advanced treatment method for landfill leachate |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP3495318B2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006187725A (en) * | 2005-01-06 | 2006-07-20 | Mitsubishi Gas Chem Co Inc | Waste disposal method |
| CN100454004C (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2009-01-21 | 山东省科学院海洋仪器仪表研究所 | Synergistic measurement of chemical oxygen demand and total organic carbon by ozone and hydrogen peroxide |
| CN105967381A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2016-09-28 | 南京工业大学 | Treatment method of high-silicon oily wastewater |
-
2000
- 2000-06-01 JP JP2000164994A patent/JP3495318B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006187725A (en) * | 2005-01-06 | 2006-07-20 | Mitsubishi Gas Chem Co Inc | Waste disposal method |
| CN100454004C (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2009-01-21 | 山东省科学院海洋仪器仪表研究所 | Synergistic measurement of chemical oxygen demand and total organic carbon by ozone and hydrogen peroxide |
| CN105967381A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2016-09-28 | 南京工业大学 | Treatment method of high-silicon oily wastewater |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP3495318B2 (en) | 2004-02-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Geenens et al. | Combined ozone-activated sludge treatment of landfill leachate | |
| JP2001205277A (en) | Method and apparatus for removing hardly decomposable organic compounds in water | |
| JP4065226B2 (en) | Method for purifying contaminated soil and contaminated groundwater | |
| KR100320604B1 (en) | High efficiency active sludge wastewater treatment system using advanced oxidation and its method | |
| JP4787814B2 (en) | Organic wastewater purification method and apparatus | |
| JP2003088892A (en) | Organic waste water treatment apparatus | |
| JP3495318B2 (en) | Advanced treatment method for landfill leachate | |
| US5976384A (en) | Process for treating waste water | |
| JP3766298B2 (en) | Wastewater treatment method and apparatus | |
| JP2000102794A (en) | Treatment of harmful material and device therefor | |
| JP2004066193A (en) | How to clean contaminated soil | |
| JP3680742B2 (en) | Method for treating wastewater containing dioxins | |
| Wang et al. | Ozonation of dissolved organic matter in biologically treated wastewater effluents | |
| CN209456261U (en) | A kind of hazardous waste processing center waste water treatment system | |
| Thakur et al. | Microbes-based nanomaterials for the wastewater treatment and decontamination of water | |
| JP3449864B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing organic sludge | |
| KR970009649B1 (en) | Treatment of Refractory Wastewater Using Iron Salt Catalytic Air Oxidation and Hydrogen Peroxide | |
| KR100757332B1 (en) | Pollutant soil purification method | |
| JP2001170672A (en) | Wastewater treatment method | |
| JP2002355695A (en) | Water treatment method and apparatus | |
| KR100475274B1 (en) | The resolution method of the non-resolutive material | |
| JP2000354892A (en) | Treatment equipment for water containing persistent organic matter | |
| JP3373138B2 (en) | Organic wastewater treatment method and apparatus | |
| JP4230675B2 (en) | Treatment of bromic acid-containing wastewater | |
| Aziz et al. | Trend of municipal landfill leachate treatment via a combination of ozone with various physic-chemical techniques |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20031111 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| R360 | Written notification for declining of transfer of rights |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R360 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| R370 | Written measure of declining of transfer procedure |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R370 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071121 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081121 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081121 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091121 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101121 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111121 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111121 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121121 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131121 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131121 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131121 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |