EP2706145B1 - Vehicle retention system - Google Patents
Vehicle retention system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2706145B1 EP2706145B1 EP13183796.5A EP13183796A EP2706145B1 EP 2706145 B1 EP2706145 B1 EP 2706145B1 EP 13183796 A EP13183796 A EP 13183796A EP 2706145 B1 EP2706145 B1 EP 2706145B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- profile
- restraint system
- vehicle restraint
- guardrail
- post
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F15/00—Safety arrangements for slowing, redirecting or stopping errant vehicles, e.g. guard posts or bollards; Arrangements for reducing damage to roadside structures due to vehicular impact
- E01F15/02—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes
- E01F15/04—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of longitudinal beams or rigid strips supported above ground at spaced points
- E01F15/0407—Metal rails
- E01F15/0438—Spacers between rails and posts, e.g. energy-absorbing means
Definitions
- the invention relates to a vehicle restraint system.
- plank profile of which has a central plank bridge and plank limbs adjoining the plank bridge above and below eg: A-profile
- EP1564334A1 it is known from the prior art (EP1564334A1 ), to let projecting tabs on its closed hollow profile, which can be tightened to the shape of the guard rail according to the guardrail.
- the two tabs of the spacer are fastened to the upper half of the guardrail.
- the lower half of the guardrail is thus freely deformable, which increases the damping effect of the guardrail in an impact.
- a contact of an impacting vehicle with the post can not completely exclude such a vehicle restraint system, which is also not required by such vehicle restraint systems.
- a vehicle restraint system according to the preamble of claim 1 is known from FR 1 304 119 A known.
- the invention has therefore based on the above-described prior art, the task of constructively modify a vehicle restraint system such that the risk of contact of an impacting vehicle can be reduced with a provided behind the guard rail posts.
- the invention solves the problem set by the features of claim 1.
- the deformation behavior of the vehicle restraint system can initially be modified in a structurally simple manner from the resulting additional stiffening in such a way that a reduction in the risk of post contact of an impacting vehicle can be expected.
- the spacers can support the crash barrier so that mechanically improved in its upper and lower profile expression and thus fix it.
- the profile shape of the protective barrier can thus also be preserved and thus lead to an advantageously high resistance moment of the vehicle restraint system.
- the latter can be ensured even at different impact angles, since the shear centers of the profiles of at least two spacers are offset from one another horizontally.
- a different buckling behavior of the spacers can namely be used to maintain the distance of the guardrail against the post or to secure.
- an unwanted threading of an impacting vehicle with a guard rail can thus be avoided.
- An abrupt deceleration of the vehicle and thus increased occupant loads can be excluded so advantageous.
- the vehicle restraint system according to the invention can therefore be characterized by ensuring a comparatively high level of safety.
- the construction conditions can be further simplified if the spacers each have a single symmetrical profile.
- such spacers can allow comparatively simple installation conditions.
- a U-profile can be distinguished in particular.
- the number of different components and subsequently the manufacturing cost of the vehicle restraint system can be reduced by the spacers are the same in their profile.
- a horizontal displacement of the shear centers of the profiles of the spacers to each other can be achieved by the spacers are mutually reversed arranged between posts and crash barrier.
- the installation and maintenance of the vehicle restraint system can be considerably facilitated by these same spacers.
- a particularly high free deformability of the spacers may result if the two spacers between the posts and the guardrail are arranged one below the other.
- a mutual obstruction of the spacers can thus be excluded in their buckling behavior. This can further increase the safety of a vehicle restraint system, especially as it is also to be expected with a reproducible behavior of the spacer in an impact.
- the rigidity of the connection of the guardrail to the or the post can be further increased.
- this wider connection of the spacer to the guardrail ensures a higher resistance to evasion of the spacer in case of deformation of the guardrail.
- this can also reduce the risk that the spacer of the guard rail protrudes after an impact in the direction of the road. The safety of the vehicle restraint system can thus be further improved.
- each a flange of the two spacers is firmly connected to the edge region of the two Plankenschenkel the guardrail. This can ensure that even deformations of the edge region of the guardrail are taken up by the spacers and an escape of the guardrail is prevented. The risk of unwanted threading can thus be further reduced.
- the restraining effect of the vehicle restraint system can be increased if the vehicle restraint system has a plurality of posts with an open post profile, a support profile spanning the top of the posts, and fasteners provided between the support profile and posts, each having two mounting brackets and connectors provided to both post legs of the post profile. connect the angle legs of the respective mounting bracket with support profile or with posts so positively and positively, that in a collision-related loosening their non-positive connections an approved relative movement between the support section and post is limited by the positive connection.
- the force acting on the guardrail impact forces can be initiated over a longer range of the vehicle restraint system, and the guardrail be supported in the Switzerlandbandfunktion.
- this does not suffer from the functionality of the protective barrier.
- the inventive limited mobility of the support profile relative to the post may be sufficient to reduce impact loads in all directions of the vehicle restraint system, without having to fear a loosening of the fastener and so breaking through an impacting vehicle.
- the post can be stiffened against torsion by supporting profile and posts are parallel to the mounting brackets with a connecting element positively and positively connected.
- a connecting element positively and positively connected may be provided in this connection that support section and posts are so non-positively and positively connected, that in an impact-related release of the non-positive connection, an approved relative movement between the support section and post by the positive connection is limited.
- a limited mobility of support profile and posts can be approved or provided in a structurally simple manner, if each connecting element passes through at least one slot.
- This slot can be provided on the support section, posts or on the mounting bracket.
- each connecting element Passing through each connecting element two longitudinally inclined to each other extending slots, a multi-axis mobility of support section and posts can be created.
- the impact energy can dissipate in different directions of movement by releasing the non-positive connections.
- a comparatively high performance, as known from vehicle restraint systems of containment level H4B, can be achieved thereby.
- a comparatively high dimensional stability of the vehicle restraint system can result if the carrying profile bears against the post.
- This dimensional stability can be further increased if the angle legs of the respective mounting bracket abut the support section or the post.
- Fig. 1 illustrated vehicle restraint system 1 for a non-illustrated roadway has a plurality of posts 2, which are anchored in the ground 3.
- a protective barrier 4 is provided, which is secured via spacers 5 and 6 to the post 2.
- the vehicle restraint system 1 is also assigned a support profile 7, which spans the posts 2 and is firmly connected thereto.
- the guardrail 4 shows a two-wave plank profile, as in particular in Fig. 3 can be recognized. This plank profile is formed from a central plank web 8 and from, to the plank web 8 above and below subsequent plank legs 9, 10. The adjoining the concave plank web 8 convex plank legs 9, 10 run the road partially to.
- the spacers 5, 6 both have a profile 11, 12 and in each case a shear center M1, M2, as this particular after Fig. 2 is apparent.
- a shear center M1, M2 as this particular after Fig. 2 is apparent.
- flanges 13, 14 and 15, 16 which are firmly connected to a plank leg 9 and 10 of the guardrail 4.
- the vehicle restraint system 1 is significantly stiffened by two spacers 5 and 6 are provided between each post 2 and the guardrail 4, which are open in its cross section, as shown in FIG Fig. 2 shown U-profiles can be seen.
- the two spacers 5 and 6 are each connected to the upper and lower Plankenschenkel 9, 10 of the guardrail 4.
- the shear centers M1, M2 of the profiles 11, 12 of the spacers 5, 6 are arranged offset from each other horizontally, whereby the spacers 5, 6 a different Buckling behavior can be imposed. Thus, a distance between guardrail 4 and post 2 can be ensured improved.
- the vehicle restraint system 1 according to the invention is therefore characterized by a high degree of safety.
- the simply symmetrical profiles 11, 12 (for example: U-profiles) of the spacers 5, 6 offer a comparatively high mechanical rigidity in spite of reduced mass compared with other profile shapes.
- the same profile 11, 12 of the spacers 5 and 6 also offers the option to arrange the spacers 5, 6 inverted between the post 2 and the protective barrier 4. As in Fig. 2 To recognize the spacers are rotated counter to their horizontal axis and thus arranged reversed to each other. Thus, a displacement of the shear centers M1, M2 of the profiles 11, 12 is created in a structurally simple manner. In addition, this measure leads to a reduction in the number of different components on the vehicle restraint system 1.
- the two spacers 5, 6 are arranged between the posts 2 and 4 guardrails with each other, so that they also with two flanges 13, 14 and 15, 16, which protrude from the upper and lower edges 17, 18 of the respective profile, the guardrail 4 wide can take.
- the flanges 13, 14 and 15, 16 fixedly connected to the relevant Plank legs 9 and 10 via screw.
- FIG. 4 To Fig. 4 is to recognize the C-profile of the post 2, which is shown by the support section 7 - torn open in the area of the post 2 -, is spanned. Between the support section 7 and the post 2 fasteners are arranged.
- the fastening means include two mounting brackets 19 and 20, and a plurality of connecting elements 21, which are designed as screw. These connecting elements 21 connect the angle legs 22, 23 of the respective mounting bracket 19 and 20 with support profile 7 or post 2 positively and positively - and Although such positive and positive locking that in a collision of a vehicle solves the non-positive connection of the connecting elements 21 and support section 7 and 2 posts can move against each other, on the one hand to distribute the impact energy over the length of the vehicle restraint system 1 and reduce.
- the support section 7 is connected to the post 2. Again, the support section 7 so positively and positively connected to the post 2 via a connecting element 21, that in an impact-related release of the non-positive connection, an approved relative movement between the support section 7 and post 2 is limited by the positive connection.
- FIGS. 1 . 3 and 4 passes through each connecting element two longitudinally inclined to each other extending slots.
- Fig. 4 is a deviating from the right angle inclination of the slots 24 can be seen.
- the other slots 24 - two slots 24 for a connecting element 21 - are the sake of simplicity normal to each other.
- a multi-axis relative movement between the support section 7 with post 2 is possible, whereby impact energy is reduced by all components 2 and 7 of the vehicle restraint system in all directions.
- the support section 7 is located on the post 2 in its front region, as in Fig. 3 can be recognized.
- the angle legs 22, 23 of the respective mounting bracket 19, 20 are located on the support section 7 or on the post 2, wherein the mounting bracket 19, 20 are designed as L-profile, as shown Fig. 1 can be seen.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Refuge Islands, Traffic Blockers, Or Guard Fence (AREA)
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Fahrzeugrückhaltesystem.The invention relates to a vehicle restraint system.
Um eine Schutzplanke, dessen Plankenprofil einen mittleren Plankensteg und an den Plankensteg oberhalb und unterhalb anschließende Plankenschenkel (z.B.: A-Profil) aufweist, an einem Distanzhalter zu befestigen, ist es aus dem Stand der Technik bekannt (
Aus dem Stand der Technik ist es außerdem bekannt (
Ein Fahrzeugrückhaltesystem nach dem Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 1 ist aus der
Die Erfindung hat sich daher ausgehend dem eingangs geschilderten Stand der Technik die Aufgabe gestellt, ein Fahrzeugrückhaltesystem derart konstruktiv zu verändern, dass die Kontaktgefahr eines anprallenden Fahrzeugs mit einem hinter der Schutzplanke vorgesehenen Pfosten vermindert werden kann.The invention has therefore based on the above-described prior art, the task of constructively modify a vehicle restraint system such that the risk of contact of an impacting vehicle can be reduced with a provided behind the guard rail posts.
Die Erfindung löst die gestellte Aufgabe durch die Merkmale des Anspruchs 1.The invention solves the problem set by the features of
Sind zwischen Pfosten und Schutzplanke mindestens zwei Distanzhalter vorgesehen, so kann sich aus der daraus ergebenden zusätzlichen Versteifung zunächst das Deformationsverhalten des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems auf konstruktiv einfache Weise derart verändern, dass mit einer Reduktion der Gefahr einer Pfostenberührung eines anprallenden Fahrzeugs gerechnet werden kann. Dies insbesondere dadurch, dass mindestens zwei Distanzhalter jeweils ein offenes Querschnittsprofil aufweisen, von denen mindestens ein Distanzhalter mit seinem vom Profil abstehenden Flansch mit dem oberen Plankenschenkel der Schutzplanke und mindestens ein anderer Distanzhalter mit seinem vom Profil abstehenden Flansch mit dem unteren Plankenschenkel der Schutzplanke fest verbunden ist. Die Distanzhalter können die Schutzplanke damit nämlich in ihrer oberen und unteren Profilausprägung mechanisch verbessert abstützen und damit auch fixieren. Bei einem Fahrzeuganprall kann damit auch die Profilform der Schutzplanke erhalten bleiben und so zu einem vorteilhaft hohen Widerstandsmoment des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems führen. Letzteres kann selbst bei unterschiedlichen Anprallwinkeln sichergestellt bleiben, da die Schubmittelpunkte der Profile mindestens zweier Distanzhalter horizontal zueinander versetzt sind. Dadurch kann nämlich ein unterschiedliches Knickverhalten der Distanzhalter genutzt werden, den Abstand der Schutzplanke gegenüber dem Pfosten zu erhalten bzw. zu sicheren. Zudem kann damit ein unerwünschtes Einfädeln eines anprallenden Fahrzeugs mit einem Posten der Schutzplanke vermieden werden. Ein abruptes Abbremsen des Fahrzeugs und damit erhöhte Insassenbelastungen können so vorteilhaft ausgeschlossen werden. Trotz der vergleichsweise einfachen Konstruktionsverhältnisse des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems kann also ein Anprall eines Fahrzeugs auf den Pfosten nahezu ausgeschlossen werden. Das erfindungsgemäße Fahrzeugrückhaltesystem kann sich daher durch die Gewährleistung einer vergleichsweise hohen Sicherheit auszeichnen.If at least two spacers are provided between the posts and the guardrail, the deformation behavior of the vehicle restraint system can initially be modified in a structurally simple manner from the resulting additional stiffening in such a way that a reduction in the risk of post contact of an impacting vehicle can be expected. This particular in that at least two spacers each have an open cross-sectional profile, of which at least one spacer with its protruding from the profile flange with the upper plank limb of the guardrail and at least one other spacer with its protruding from the profile flange with the lower plank limb of the guardrail is firmly connected. The spacers can support the crash barrier so that mechanically improved in its upper and lower profile expression and thus fix it. In the event of a vehicle collision, the profile shape of the protective barrier can thus also be preserved and thus lead to an advantageously high resistance moment of the vehicle restraint system. The latter can be ensured even at different impact angles, since the shear centers of the profiles of at least two spacers are offset from one another horizontally. As a result, a different buckling behavior of the spacers can namely be used to maintain the distance of the guardrail against the post or to secure. In addition, an unwanted threading of an impacting vehicle with a guard rail can thus be avoided. An abrupt deceleration of the vehicle and thus increased occupant loads can be excluded so advantageous. Despite the comparatively simple construction conditions of the vehicle restraint system, therefore, a collision of a vehicle on the post can be virtually ruled out. The vehicle restraint system according to the invention can therefore be characterized by ensuring a comparatively high level of safety.
Die Konstruktionsverhältnisse können noch weiter vereinfacht werden, wenn die Distanzhalter jeweils ein einfach symmetrisches Profil aufweisen. Zusätzlich können derartige Distanzhalter vergleichsweise einfache Montagebedingungen ermöglichen. Hinsichtlich der einfachen Montage des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems kann sich insbesondere ein U-Profil auszeichnen.The construction conditions can be further simplified if the spacers each have a single symmetrical profile. In addition, such spacers can allow comparatively simple installation conditions. With regard to the ease of installation of the vehicle restraint system, a U-profile can be distinguished in particular.
Die Anzahl an unterschiedlichen Bauteilen und in weiterer Folge die Herstellungskosten des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems können vermindert werden, indem die Distanzhalter in ihrem Profil gleich sind. Ein horizontales Versetzen der Schubmittelpunkte der Profile der Distanzhalter zueinander kann dadurch erreicht werden, indem die Distanzhalter zueinander umgedreht zwischen Pfosten und Schutzplanke angeordnet sind. Zudem kann durch diese gleichen Distanzhalter die Montage sowie auch die Wartung des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems erheblich erleichtert werden.The number of different components and subsequently the manufacturing cost of the vehicle restraint system can be reduced by the spacers are the same in their profile. A horizontal displacement of the shear centers of the profiles of the spacers to each other can be achieved by the spacers are mutually reversed arranged between posts and crash barrier. In addition, the installation and maintenance of the vehicle restraint system can be considerably facilitated by these same spacers.
Eine besonders hohe freie Verformbarkeit der Distanzhalter kann sich ergeben, wenn die beiden Distanzhalter zwischen Pfosten und Schutzplanke untereinander angeordnet sind. Im Falle eines Anpralls kann somit eine gegenseitige Behinderung der Distanzhalter in ihrem Knickverhalten ausgeschlossen werden. Dies kann die Sicherheit eines Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems weiter erhöhen, zumal damit auch mit einem reproduzierbaren Verhalten der Distanzhalter bei einem Anprall zu rechnen ist.A particularly high free deformability of the spacers may result if the two spacers between the posts and the guardrail are arranged one below the other. In the case of an impact, a mutual obstruction of the spacers can thus be excluded in their buckling behavior. This can further increase the safety of a vehicle restraint system, especially as it is also to be expected with a reproducible behavior of the spacer in an impact.
Bilden die Distanzhalter je zwei Flansche aus, die vom oberen und unteren Rand des jeweiligen Profils abstehen, wobei jeweils beide Flansche mit den betreffenden Plankenschenkeln der Schutzplanke verbunden sind, kann die Steifigkeit der Anbindung der Schutzplanke an den oder die Pfosten zusätzlich erhöht werden. Zudem gewährleistet diese breitere Anbindung des Distanzhalters an die Schutzplanke einen höheren Widerstand gegen ein Ausweichen des Distanzhalters bei Verformung der Schutzplanke. Unter anderem kann damit auch die Gefahr reduziert werden, dass der Distanzhalter der Schutzplanke nach einem Aufprall in Fahrbahnrichtung vorsteht. Die Sicherheit des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems kann damit weiter verbessert werden.Form the spacers each two flanges, which protrude from the top and bottom of the respective profile, each with both flanges are connected to the respective plank legs of the guardrail, the rigidity of the connection of the guardrail to the or the post can be further increased. In addition, this wider connection of the spacer to the guardrail ensures a higher resistance to evasion of the spacer in case of deformation of the guardrail. Among other things, this can also reduce the risk that the spacer of the guard rail protrudes after an impact in the direction of the road. The safety of the vehicle restraint system can thus be further improved.
Letzteres kann zusätzlich verbessert werden, indem je ein Flansch der beiden Distanzhalter mit dem Randbereich der beiden Plankenschenkel der Schutzplanke fest verbunden ist. Damit kann sichergestellt werden, dass selbst Verformungen der Randbereich der Schutzplanke durch die Distanzhalter aufgenommen und ein Ausweichen der Schutzplanke unterbunden wird. Die Gefahr eines unerwünschten Einfädelns kann damit noch weiter vermindert werden.The latter can be additionally improved by each a flange of the two spacers is firmly connected to the edge region of the two Plankenschenkel the guardrail. This can ensure that even deformations of the edge region of the guardrail are taken up by the spacers and an escape of the guardrail is prevented. The risk of unwanted threading can thus be further reduced.
Einfache Konstruktionsverhältnisse können sich ergeben, wenn die Schutzplanke als zweiwelliges Profil ausgeführt ist. A- oder B-Profile sind hierbei vorstellbar.Simple construction conditions can arise when the guardrail is designed as a two-shaft profile. A or B profiles are conceivable here.
Die Rückhaltewirkung des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems kann erhöht werden, wenn das Fahrzeugrückhaltesystem mehrere Pfosten mit einem offenen Pfostenprofil, ein das obere Ende der Pfosten überspannendes Tragprofil und jeweils zwischen Tragprofil und Pfosten vorgesehene Befestigungsmittel aufweist, die je zwei zu beiden Pfostenschenkeln des Pfostenprofils vorgesehene Montagewinkel und Verbindungselemente aufweist, die die Winkelschenkel des jeweiligen Montagewinkels mit Tragprofil oder mit Pfosten derart kraft- und formschlüssig verbinden, dass bei einem anprallbedingten Lösen deren kraftschlüssigen Verbindungen eine zugelassene Relativbewegung zwischen Tragprofil und Pfosten durch deren formschlüssige Verbindung begrenzt ist. Damit können nämlich die auf die Schutzplanke einwirkenden Anprallkräfte über einen längeren Bereich des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems eingeleitet werden, und die Schutzplanke in der Zugbandfunktion unterstützt werden. Vorteilhaft leidet darunter jedoch nicht die Funktionalität der Schutzplanke. Die erfindungsgemäße beschränkte Beweglichkeit des Tragprofils gegenüber den Pfosten kann ausreichen, Anprallbelastungen in allen Richtungen des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems abzubauen, ohne damit ein Lösen der Befestigungsmittel und so ein Durchbrechen eines anprallenden Fahrzeugs befürchten zu müssen.The restraining effect of the vehicle restraint system can be increased if the vehicle restraint system has a plurality of posts with an open post profile, a support profile spanning the top of the posts, and fasteners provided between the support profile and posts, each having two mounting brackets and connectors provided to both post legs of the post profile. connect the angle legs of the respective mounting bracket with support profile or with posts so positively and positively, that in a collision-related loosening their non-positive connections an approved relative movement between the support section and post is limited by the positive connection. Thus, namely, the force acting on the guardrail impact forces can be initiated over a longer range of the vehicle restraint system, and the guardrail be supported in the Zugbandfunktion. Advantageously, however, this does not suffer from the functionality of the protective barrier. The inventive limited mobility of the support profile relative to the post may be sufficient to reduce impact loads in all directions of the vehicle restraint system, without having to fear a loosening of the fastener and so breaking through an impacting vehicle.
Der Pfosten kann gegenüber Torsion versteift werden, indem Tragprofil und Pfosten parallel zu den Montagewinkeln mit einem Verbindungselement kraft- und formschlüssig verbunden sind. Um die begrenzte Beweglichkeit zwischen Tragprofil und Pfosten nicht zu beschränken, kann bei dieser Verbindung vorgesehen sein, dass Tragprofil und Pfosten derart kraft- und formschlüssig verbunden sind, dass bei einem anprallbedingten Lösen der kraftschlüssigen Verbindung eine zugelassene Relativbewegung zwischen Tragprofil und Pfosten durch die formschlüssige Verbindung begrenzt ist.The post can be stiffened against torsion by supporting profile and posts are parallel to the mounting brackets with a connecting element positively and positively connected. In order not to limit the limited mobility between the support section and posts, may be provided in this connection that support section and posts are so non-positively and positively connected, that in an impact-related release of the non-positive connection, an approved relative movement between the support section and post by the positive connection is limited.
Sind die Verbindungselemente als Schraubverbindungen ausgeführt, können sich nicht nur einfache Handhabungsverhältnisse bei der Montage des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems ergeben, sondern auch der Aufwand dessen Wartungs- bzw. Reparaturarbeiten reduziert werden.Are the fasteners designed as screw, not only simple handling conditions in the installation of the vehicle restraint system can result, but also the cost of maintenance or repair work can be reduced.
Eine begrenzte Beweglichkeit von Tragprofil und Pfosten kann auf konstruktiv einfache Weise zugelassen bzw. vorgesehen werden, wenn jedes Verbindungselement mindestens ein Langloch durchgreift. Dieses Langloch kann am Tragprofil, Pfosten bzw. auch am Montagewinkel vorgesehen sein.A limited mobility of support profile and posts can be approved or provided in a structurally simple manner, if each connecting element passes through at least one slot. This slot can be provided on the support section, posts or on the mounting bracket.
Durchgreift jedes Verbindungselement zwei in Längsrichtung geneigt zueinander verlaufende Langlöcher, kann eine mehrachsige Beweglichkeit von Tragprofil und Pfosten geschaffen werden. Zudem kann sich durch ein Lösen der kraftschlüssigen Verbindungen die Anprallenergie in verschiedene Bewegungsrichtungen abbauen. Eine vergleichsweise hohe Performance, wie diese von Fahrzeugrückhaltesystemen der Aufhaltestufe H4B bekannt ist, kann dadurch erreicht werden.Passing through each connecting element two longitudinally inclined to each other extending slots, a multi-axis mobility of support section and posts can be created. In addition, the impact energy can dissipate in different directions of movement by releasing the non-positive connections. A comparatively high performance, as known from vehicle restraint systems of containment level H4B, can be achieved thereby.
Eine vergleichsweise hohe Formstabilität des Fahrzeugrückhaltesystems kann sich ergeben, wenn das Tragprofil am Pfosten anliegt.A comparatively high dimensional stability of the vehicle restraint system can result if the carrying profile bears against the post.
Diese Formstabilität kann weiter erhöht werden, wenn die Winkelschenkel des jeweiligen Montagewinkels am Tragprofil oder am Pfosten anliegen.This dimensional stability can be further increased if the angle legs of the respective mounting bracket abut the support section or the post.
Zudem ergeben sich einfache Konstruktionsverhältnisse, wenn die Montagewinkel ein L-Profil aufweisen.In addition, simple construction conditions arise when the mounting bracket have an L-profile.
In den Figuren ist beispielsweise der Erfindungsgegenstand anhand eines Ausführungsbeispiels dargestellt. Es zeigen
- Fig. 1
- eine aufgerissene Frontansicht auf das erfindungsgemäße Fahrzeugrückhaltesystem,
- Fig. 2
- eine vergrößerte Teilansicht der
Fig. 1 , - Fig. 3
- eine Schnittansicht nach III-III der
Fig. 1 und - Fig. 4
- eine abgerissene und teilweise aufgerissene Draufsicht auf das nach
Fig. 1 dargestellte Fahrzeugrückhaltesystem.
- Fig. 1
- a torn-open front view of the vehicle restraint system according to the invention,
- Fig. 2
- an enlarged partial view of the
Fig. 1 . - Fig. 3
- a sectional view according to III-III of
Fig. 1 and - Fig. 4
- a torn and partially torn top view of the after
Fig. 1 illustrated vehicle restraint system.
Das beispielsweise nach
Das Fahrzeugrückhaltesystem 1 wird erheblich versteift, indem zwischen jedem Pfosten 2 und der Schutzplanke 4 zwei Distanzhalter 5 und 6 vorgesehen sind, die in ihrem Querschnitt offen sind, wie dies anhand der nach
Wie bereits erwähnt, bieten die einfach symmetrischen Profile 11, 12 (z.B.: U-Profile) der Distanzhaltern 5, 6 trotz reduzierter Masse gegenüber anderen Profilformen eine vergleichsweise hohe mechanische Steifigkeit.As already mentioned, the simply
Das gleiche Profil 11, 12 der Distanzhalter 5 und 6 bietet auch die Option, die Distanzhalter 5, 6 zueinander umgedreht zwischen Pfosten 2 und Schutzplanke 4 anzuordnen. Wie in
Die beiden Distanzhalter 5, 6 sind zwischen Pfosten 2 und Schutzplanke 4 untereinander angeordnet, sodass diese auch mit je zwei Flanschen 13, 14 bzw. 15, 16, die vom oberen und unteren Rand 17, 18 des jeweiligen Profils abstehen, die Schutzplanke 4 breit fassen können. Hierfür sind die Flansche 13, 14 bzw. 15, 16 mit den betreffenden Plankenschenkeln 9 bzw. 10 über Schraubverbindungen fest verbunden.The two
Nach
Parallel zu den Montagewinkeln 19, 20 ist das Tragprofil 7 mit dem Pfosten 2 verbunden. Auch hier ist das Tragprofil 7 mit dem Pfosten 2 über ein Verbindungselement 21 derart kraft- und formschlüssig verbunden, dass bei einem anprallbedingten Lösen der kraftschlüssigen Verbindung eine zugelassene Relativbewegung zwischen Tragprofil 7 und Pfosten 2 durch die formschlüssige Verbindung begrenzt ist.Parallel to the mounting
Wie den
Konstruktiv einfach liegt das Tragprofil 7 am Pfosten 2 in seinem vorderen Bereich an, wie dies in
Die Winkelschenkel 22, 23 des jeweiligen Montagewinkels 19, 20 liegen am Tragprofil 7 oder am Pfosten 2 an, wobei die Montagewinkel 19, 20 als L-Profil ausgeführt sind, wie dies nach
Außerdem ist den
Claims (15)
- Vehicle restraint system with at least one post (2), with at least one guardrail (4) whose plank profile has a central plank web (8) and plank legs (9, 10) adjoining the plank web (8) above and below, which taper the roadway at least partially, and with at least one, post (2) and guardrail (4) firmly connecting spacer (5, 6) having a profile (11, 12) with a shear center (M1, M2) and at least one flange (13, 14 or 15, 16) projecting of its profile (11, 12), which flange (13, 14 or 15, 16) is firmly connected to the plank legs (9, 10) of the guardrail (4), wherein between the post (2) and guardrail (4) at least two spacers (5, 6) are provided, each having a cross-sectionally open profile (11, 12), of which spacers (5, 6) at least one spacer (5) with its from the profile (11) projecting flange (13, 14) is firmly connected to the upper plank limb (9) of guardrail (4) and at least one other spacer (6) with its from the profile (12) projecting flange (15, 16) is firmly connected to the lower plank limb (10) of the guardrail (4), characterized in that the shear centers (M1, M2) of the profiles (11, 12) of at least two oft he spacers (5, 6) are offset from each other horizontally.
- Vehicle restraint system according to claim 1, characterized in that the spacers (5, 6) each have a single symmetrical profile (11, 12), more particularly U-profile.
- Vehicle restraint system according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that in their profile (11, 12) identical spacers (5, 6) are turned around relative to one another, between posts (2) and guardrail (4).
- Vehicle restraint system according to claim 1, 2 or 3, characterized marked characterized in that the two spacers (5, 6) between posts (2) and guardrail (4) are arranged one below the other.
- Vehicle restraint system according to one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the spacers (5, 6) each form two flanges (13, 14 or 15, 16) which protrude from the upper and lower edges (17, 18) of the respective profile (11, 12), wherein in each case both flanges (13, 14 and 15, 16) are connected with the respective plank limb (9, 10) of the guardrail (4).
- Vehicle restraint system according to one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that one flange (13 or 16) each of the two spacers (5, 6) is firmly connected with the edge region of the plank limb (9, 10) of the guardrail (4).
- Vehicle restraint system according to one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the guardrail (4) is designed as a two-part profile.
- Vehicle restraint system according to one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the vehicle restraint system (1) has a plurality of posts (2) with an open, more particularly C-shaped, post profile, a supporting profile (7) spanning the upper end of the posts (2) and fastening means respectively provided between the supporting profile (7) and posts (2), which has each two mounting bracket (19, 20) provided to both post legs of the post profile and connecting elements (21), connecting the angle legs (22, 23) of the respective mounting bracket (19, 20) to the support profile (7) or to the posts (2) in such a force-fit and form-fit manner, in that, in the event of an impact-related release, their force-fit connection is limited by an admitted relative movement between the supporting profile (7) and the post (2) by their form-fit connection.
- Vehicle restraint system according to claim 8, characterized in that supporting profile (7) and posts (2) are connected in a force-fit and form-fit manner parallel to the mounting brackets (19, 20) with a connecting element (21) in such a way, that in an impact-related release of the force-fit connection, an approved relative movement between the support profile (7) and post (2) is limited by the positive connection.
- Vehicle restraint system according to claim 8 or 9, characterized in that the connecting elements (21) are designed as screw connections.
- Vehicle restraint system according to claim 8, 9 or 10, characterized in that each connecting element (21) protrude through at least one slot (24).
- Vehicle restraint system according to claim 11, characterized in that each connecting element (21) protrude through two elongated holes (24) which run inclined to one another in the longitudinal direction.
- Vehicle restraint system according to one of claims 8 to 12, characterized in that the support profile (7) bears against the post (2).
- Vehicle restraint system according to one of claims 8 to 13, characterized in that the angle legs (22, 23) of the respective mounting bracket (19, 20) rest on the support profile (7) or on the post (2).
- Vehicle restraint system according to one of claims 8 to 14, characterized in that the mounting bracket (19, 20) have an L-profile.
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| SI201331338T SI2706145T1 (en) | 2012-09-10 | 2013-09-10 | Vehicle retention system |
| RS20190151A RS58395B1 (en) | 2012-09-10 | 2013-09-10 | Vehicle retention system |
| PL13183796T PL2706145T4 (en) | 2012-09-10 | 2013-09-10 | Vehicle retention system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATA50373/2012A AT512661B1 (en) | 2012-09-10 | 2012-09-10 | Vehicle restraint system |
Publications (3)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP2706145A2 EP2706145A2 (en) | 2014-03-12 |
| EP2706145A3 EP2706145A3 (en) | 2016-11-16 |
| EP2706145B1 true EP2706145B1 (en) | 2018-10-31 |
Family
ID=49209225
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP13183796.5A Active EP2706145B1 (en) | 2012-09-10 | 2013-09-10 | Vehicle retention system |
Country Status (8)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP2706145B1 (en) |
| AT (1) | AT512661B1 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2714310T3 (en) |
| HU (1) | HUE043764T2 (en) |
| PL (1) | PL2706145T4 (en) |
| RS (1) | RS58395B1 (en) |
| SI (1) | SI2706145T1 (en) |
| TR (1) | TR201901386T4 (en) |
Family Cites Families (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR1304119A (en) * | 1961-08-08 | 1962-09-21 | Metallurg De L Escaut Soc | Road safety device |
| CH408984A (en) * | 1963-02-28 | 1966-03-15 | Bucher Edwin Ing Dr | Guide device on the road |
| CH414716A (en) * | 1964-02-28 | 1966-06-15 | Mec Belotti S A S Di Ghinelli | Elastic buffer barrier for road edges |
| DE4421304A1 (en) * | 1994-06-17 | 1995-12-21 | Leit Ramm D Graf Von Koenigsma | Protection device |
| IT1282766B1 (en) * | 1996-05-30 | 1998-03-31 | Autostrada Del Brennero S P A | HIGH PERFORMANCE DEFORMABLE STEEL ROAD BARRIER |
| ATE242824T1 (en) * | 1999-06-14 | 2003-06-15 | Spig Schutzplanken Prod Gmbh | GUARDRAIL ARRANGEMENT |
| AT7685U1 (en) | 2004-02-16 | 2005-07-25 | Voest Alpine Krems Finaltech | guide |
-
2012
- 2012-09-10 AT ATA50373/2012A patent/AT512661B1/en active
-
2013
- 2013-09-10 RS RS20190151A patent/RS58395B1/en unknown
- 2013-09-10 HU HUE13183796A patent/HUE043764T2/en unknown
- 2013-09-10 ES ES13183796T patent/ES2714310T3/en active Active
- 2013-09-10 SI SI201331338T patent/SI2706145T1/en unknown
- 2013-09-10 PL PL13183796T patent/PL2706145T4/en unknown
- 2013-09-10 EP EP13183796.5A patent/EP2706145B1/en active Active
- 2013-09-10 TR TR2019/01386T patent/TR201901386T4/en unknown
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| None * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| TR201901386T4 (en) | 2019-03-21 |
| RS58395B1 (en) | 2019-04-30 |
| AT512661A4 (en) | 2013-10-15 |
| AT512661B1 (en) | 2013-10-15 |
| EP2706145A3 (en) | 2016-11-16 |
| PL2706145T3 (en) | 2019-07-31 |
| EP2706145A2 (en) | 2014-03-12 |
| PL2706145T4 (en) | 2019-07-31 |
| ES2714310T3 (en) | 2019-05-28 |
| HUE043764T2 (en) | 2019-09-30 |
| SI2706145T1 (en) | 2019-03-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP2455546B1 (en) | Post assembly for a protective plank construction and protective plank construction for securing tracks on structures | |
| EP2902568B1 (en) | Protective fence | |
| EP0874940B1 (en) | Protective beam arrangement | |
| DE112014000467B4 (en) | Flexible guardrail with improved impact energy absorption capacity | |
| EP1061179B1 (en) | Guard rail | |
| EP2333159B1 (en) | Crash barrier | |
| EP1997957B1 (en) | Vehicle restraint system on traffic routes | |
| EP2017387B1 (en) | Crash barrier assembly | |
| DE102007063511B4 (en) | Protective device on traffic routes | |
| EP2706145B1 (en) | Vehicle retention system | |
| DE202010000658U1 (en) | Guard rail arrangement | |
| DE10356220B4 (en) | Safety device for passable or accessible surfaces | |
| DE2202510A1 (en) | Road guidance device with a profiled guardrail | |
| DE202008011203U1 (en) | Vehicle restraint system on traffic routes | |
| EP2567030B1 (en) | Traffic barrier | |
| DE202012010034U1 (en) | barrier | |
| EP2982800B1 (en) | Vehicle retention system | |
| EP3339512B1 (en) | Vehicle retention system | |
| CH494863A (en) | Guide device with guide rails and stand, in particular road guide device for median strips | |
| AT409005B (en) | guide | |
| EP3121336B1 (en) | Vehicle retention system | |
| EP2792793B1 (en) | Vehicle retention system | |
| DE102007033732A1 (en) | Protective beam arrangement for roadway, has reinforcing sections to clamp bars between assembling section and bars of central region, and overlap side piece of region with their side pieces, where plates extend over side pieces of sections | |
| DE20304571U1 (en) | Arrangement with a fall arrester against cargo shedding of vehicles | |
| EP1784541B1 (en) | Restraint system for roadways |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: VOESTALPINE KREMS FINALTECHNIK GMBH |
|
| PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: E01F 15/04 20060101AFI20161011BHEP |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20170516 |
|
| RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20170725 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20180509 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1059541 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20181115 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502013011470 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20181031 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190131 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190131 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190228 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2714310 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20190528 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190301 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190201 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502013011470 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HU Ref legal event code: AG4A Ref document number: E043764 Country of ref document: HU |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190801 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190910 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190910 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20190930 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20190910 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190910 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181031 |
|
| P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230706 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20250929 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20250822 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20250821 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20250919 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Payment date: 20250822 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20250929 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Payment date: 20250819 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20250826 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Payment date: 20250819 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Payment date: 20250818 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20251001 Year of fee payment: 13 |