[go: up one dir, main page]

EP0281035B1 - Procédé de surveillance pour la détermination électrodynamique de l'épaisseur et des erreurs - Google Patents

Procédé de surveillance pour la détermination électrodynamique de l'épaisseur et des erreurs Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0281035B1
EP0281035B1 EP88102926A EP88102926A EP0281035B1 EP 0281035 B1 EP0281035 B1 EP 0281035B1 EP 88102926 A EP88102926 A EP 88102926A EP 88102926 A EP88102926 A EP 88102926A EP 0281035 B1 EP0281035 B1 EP 0281035B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
delay line
signals
signal
electrodynamic
evaluation unit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP88102926A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0281035A2 (fr
EP0281035A3 (en
Inventor
Jörg Dipl.-Ing. Quittkat
Gerhard Dipl.-Ing. Thiel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of EP0281035A2 publication Critical patent/EP0281035A2/fr
Publication of EP0281035A3 publication Critical patent/EP0281035A3/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0281035B1 publication Critical patent/EP0281035B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01BMEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B7/00Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques
    • G01B7/02Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring length, width or thickness
    • G01B7/06Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring length, width or thickness for measuring thickness
    • G01B7/063Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring length, width or thickness for measuring thickness using piezoelectric resonators
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01BMEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B17/00Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of infrasonic, sonic or ultrasonic vibrations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01BMEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B21/00Measuring arrangements or details thereof, where the measuring technique is not covered by the other groups of this subclass, unspecified or not relevant
    • G01B21/02Measuring arrangements or details thereof, where the measuring technique is not covered by the other groups of this subclass, unspecified or not relevant for measuring length, width, or thickness
    • G01B21/08Measuring arrangements or details thereof, where the measuring technique is not covered by the other groups of this subclass, unspecified or not relevant for measuring length, width, or thickness for measuring thickness

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for monitoring electrical components of a device for electrodynamic wall thickness and error testing, in which a transmitter generates short-term signals that are fed via a transmitter coil of an electrodynamic converter into the workpiece to be tested, where the signals are reflected and where reflected signals of a receiver coil and from there via an amplifier to an evaluation unit.
  • the electrical transmission signal generated by the transmitter is fed into the workpiece to be tested via the electrodynamic converter.
  • This transmission signal has a very high energy.
  • the signal is reflected in the workpiece and, after being converted into an electrical signal, is fed by the converter to the evaluation unit for evaluation.
  • the reflected electrical signal has a very low energy compared to the transmitted signal, so that a sensitive amplifier is necessary.
  • the evaluation unit records the time between the occurrence of the transmission signal and the reception of the reflected signal as well as the amplitude of the reflected signal.
  • the aforementioned time period and also the amplitude of the reflected signal are determined not only by the workpiece to be tested, but also by the parameters of electrical components and supply lines. Occur at these parameters Changes, then this leads to changes in the time period between the occurrence of the transmission signal and the reception of the reflected signal and in the amplitude of the reflected signal. This in turn leads to incorrect measurements, since these changes are usually not recognized.
  • a method for determining the wall thickness of workpieces is known from DE-A-3 327 526, in which a transversely drilled groove is arranged in a lead body as a test reflector. The signal reflected by this test reflector is monitored. With different test head types, the test reflector is located at a different location. The test reflector is therefore mainly used to identify which type of test head is currently in use. If the temperature at the test head is increased, the signal transit time in the lead body changes. The test signal reflected at the test reflector can therefore give an indication of an excessively high temperature of the test head.
  • the task is to design a monitoring method of the type mentioned at the outset in such a way that changes in the parameters of components which influence the time period between the occurrence of the transmission signal and the reception of the reflected signal and its amplitude can be reliably detected.
  • the object is achieved according to the invention in that the signals generated by the transmitter for delay are fed to a delay line which contains at least one attenuator and which is connected to the evaluation unit via the electrodynamic converter, and in that delayed signals in the evaluation unit have a setpoint of delayed signal can be compared.
  • the provision of the delay line specifies a defined period of time between the occurrence of the transmission signal and the reception of the delayed signal.
  • This time period (predetermined target time) is not influenced by the workpiece to be tested; however, this period of time is influenced when time-influencing parameters of components of the monitoring system change. A deviation of the actual time measured here from the predetermined target time is detected in the evaluation unit and recognized as an error.
  • the attenuator ensures that the energy of the delayed signal is in the range of the energy of the reflected signals that the evaluation unit normally evaluates. If, for example, the energy of the transmission signal deviates from the target energy as a result of an error in the transmitter, then the delayed signal has a correspondingly lower energy, which the evaluation unit recognizes as an error by comparison with the target energy of the delayed signal. The energy of the delayed signal is also not affected by the workpiece to be tested.
  • the delay line can be an ultrasound delay line or an electromagnetic delay line.
  • an ultrasound delay line has at least one piezoelectric or magnetostrictive transducer and a sound conductor connected to it.
  • the signals are reflected back to the converter in the sound conductor, for example.
  • the natural frequencies of the piezoelectric or magnetostrictive transducer and the electrodynamic transducer are approximately the same, for example.
  • the attenuator is, for example, at least one resistor connected in front of the delay line.
  • the evaluation unit is assigned, for example, at least one time gate circuit which opens on the one hand when the reflected signal occurs and on the other hand when the delayed signal occurs.
  • a transmitter 1 is provided in a known manner, the transmission signal of which is fed to an electrodynamic converter 2.
  • this electrodynamic converter 2 consists of a transmitter coil 3 and a receiver coil 4, which are arranged on a workpiece 20 to be tested.
  • the coils 3, 4 are each connected to ground with one end.
  • An evaluation unit 6 is connected to the receiving coil 4 via an amplifier 5 and two time gates 19 A and 19 B.
  • the time gate circuits 19 A and 19 B can be controlled from the transmitter 1 via lines 33, 34.
  • the transmitter 1 generates a transmission signal 7, which consists of a short AC signal.
  • the reception coil 4 converts the reflected signal into an electrical signal 8, which is fed to the evaluation unit 6 via the amplifier 5.
  • the structure and mode of operation of the circuit are known.
  • an attenuator consisting of two ohmic resistors 9, 10. These resistors 9, 10 are connected in series between the output of the transmitter 1 and ground.
  • a piezo oscillator 11 is connected to the connection point P between the two resistors 9, 10. This piezo oscillator 11 is arranged on one end of a sound conductor, specifically a plexiglass rod 12. The piezo oscillator 11 and the plexiglass rod 12 together form an ultrasound delay line.
  • the transmission signal 7 generated by the transmitter 1 is thus not only supplied to the transmission coil 3, but also to the piezoelectric oscillator 11 via the first resistor 9, which converts it into an ultrasound signal that propagates in the plexiglass rod 12 and returns at the other end 13 of the rod 12 is reflected on the piezo oscillator 11.
  • the back and forth ultrasonic signals are identified by two arrows.
  • the reflected ultrasound signal is in turn converted into an electrical signal which is supplied to the transmitter coil 3 in a damped manner by the resistors 9, 10. From there it is coupled or transformed to the receiving coil 4 and fed to the evaluation unit 6 via the amplifier 5 as a delayed and damped signal 14.
  • the evaluation unit 6 is preceded by two time gate circuits 19 A, 19 B which temporarily block its input.
  • the first time gate circuit 19 A opens within the time range in which the reflected signals 8 occur. This is illustrated by curve 15.
  • the second time gate circuit 19 B opens in the time range in which the delayed and damped signal 14 occurs. This is illustrated by curve 16. In this way, further reflection signals following the reflection signal 8 are masked out.
  • the evaluation unit 6 preferably contains a setpoint comparator 28 for the actual / setpoint comparison and a display device 32 for the difference between the setpoint and actual value, ie of (A * -A) and / or (T * -T) .
  • An alarm device 35 can also be present.
  • the natural frequency of the piezo oscillator 11 is preferably in the natural frequency range of the electrodynamic converter 2.
  • an electromagnetic delay line can also be provided, which consists of T or ⁇ elements known as such.
  • the delayed and attenuated signal is generated here by reflection of the transmission pulse at the open or short-circuited end of the electromagnetic delay line. If this electromagnetic delay line is made up of longitudinal inductors and transverse capacitors, then the signal is damped by the ohmic resistors of the longitudinal inductors, so that the damping resistors 9, 10 can be omitted.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
  • Length Measuring Devices Characterised By Use Of Acoustic Means (AREA)

Claims (8)

  1. Procédé pour contrôler des composants électriques d'un dispositif de contrôle électrodynamique des épaisseurs de paroi et des défauts, et selon lequel un émetteur (1) produit des signaux de brève durée (7), qui sont envoyés, par l'intermédiaire d'une bobine d'émission (3) d'un transducteur électrodynamique (2), dans la pièce à contrôler (20), dans laquelle les signaux (7) sont réfléchis, et selon lequel les signaux réfléchis (8) sont envoyés à une bobine de réception (4) et, à partir de là, et par l'intermédiaire d'un amplificateur (5), à une unité d'évaluation (6),
    caractérisé par le fait que les signaux (7) produits dans l'émetteur (1) sont envoyés, afin d'être retardés, à une ligne à retard (11,12), qui comporte au moins un circuit d'affaiblissement (9) et qui est raccordée, par l'intermédiaire du transducteur électrodynamique (2), à l'unité d'évaluation (6), et que des signaux retardés (14) sont comparés dans l'unité d'évaluation (6) à une valeur de consigne pour un signal retardé (14).
  2. Procédé de contrôle suivant la revendication 1, caractérisé par le fait que la ligne à retard est une ligne à retard à ultrasons (11,12).
  3. Procédé de contrôle suivant la revendication 1, caractérisé par le fait que la ligne à retard est une ligne à retard électromagnétique.
  4. Procédé de contrôle suivant la revendication 2, caractérisé par le fait que la ligne à retard à ultrasons (11,12) comporte au moins un transducteur piézoélectrique ou magnétostrictif (11) et un conducteur de guidage du son (12), qui y est raccordé.
  5. Procédé de contrôle suivant la revendication 4, caractérisé par le fait que les signaux sont envoyés par réflexion au transducteur (11), dans le dispositif de guidage du son (12).
  6. Procédé de contrôle suivant la revendication 4 ou 5, caractérisé par le fait que les fréquences propres du transducteur piézoélectrique ou magnétostrictif (11) et du transducteur électrodynamique (2) sont approximativement identiques.
  7. Procédé de contrôle suivant l'une des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisé par le fait que le circuit d'affaiblissement est au moins une résistance branchée en amont de la ligne à retard (11,12).
  8. Procédé de contrôle suivant l'une des revendications 1 à 7, caractérisé par le fait qu'à l'unité d'évaluation (6) est associé au moins un circuit formant porte de commande temporelle (19 A, 19 B), qui s'ouvre, d'une part, lors de l'apparition du signal réfléchi (8), et, d'autre part, lors de l'apparition du signal retardé (14).
EP88102926A 1987-03-05 1988-02-26 Procédé de surveillance pour la détermination électrodynamique de l'épaisseur et des erreurs Expired - Lifetime EP0281035B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19873707048 DE3707048A1 (de) 1987-03-05 1987-03-05 Ueberwachungssystem bei der elektrodynamischen wanddicken- und fehlerpruefung
DE3707048 1987-03-05

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0281035A2 EP0281035A2 (fr) 1988-09-07
EP0281035A3 EP0281035A3 (en) 1990-05-30
EP0281035B1 true EP0281035B1 (fr) 1993-02-10

Family

ID=6322324

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP88102926A Expired - Lifetime EP0281035B1 (fr) 1987-03-05 1988-02-26 Procédé de surveillance pour la détermination électrodynamique de l'épaisseur et des erreurs

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US4882539A (fr)
EP (1) EP0281035B1 (fr)
DE (2) DE3707048A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH689190A5 (fr) * 1993-10-19 1998-11-30 Hans Ulrich Meyer Instrument de mesure de longueurs ou d'angles.
CN100334421C (zh) * 2005-01-21 2007-08-29 天津大学 工件壁厚与尺寸形位误差自动测量系统
CN108007402A (zh) * 2017-12-07 2018-05-08 青岛河澄知识产权有限公司 一种油膜厚度静态标定方法

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3340466A (en) * 1962-04-12 1967-09-05 Hitachi Ltd Nondestructive testers utilizing highfrequency and low-frequency eddy currents to test for surface and subsurface defects
DE1573611A1 (de) * 1965-09-11 1970-04-16 J Und H Krautkraemer Ges F Ele Schwingeranordnung fuer die Werkstoffpruefung und Wanddickenmessung nach dem Ultraschallechoverfahren
DE2853170A1 (de) * 1978-12-08 1980-06-19 Deutsch Pruef Messgeraete Verfahren und vorrichtung zur dickenmessung an prueflingen mittels ultraschalles
US4342971A (en) * 1980-12-30 1982-08-03 E-Systems, Inc. Continuously variable surface acoustic wave delay line
US4437332A (en) * 1982-09-30 1984-03-20 Krautkramer-Branson, Inc. Ultrasonic thickness measuring instrument
DE3401144C1 (de) * 1984-01-14 1984-10-25 Krautkrämer GmbH, 5000 Köln Schaltungsvorrichtung zur Korrektur des Schallaufwegfehlers bei der Wanddickenmessung mit Ultraschallimpulsen

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0281035A2 (fr) 1988-09-07
EP0281035A3 (en) 1990-05-30
DE3878267D1 (de) 1993-03-25
DE3707048A1 (de) 1988-09-15
US4882539A (en) 1989-11-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0384977B1 (fr) Appareil pour mesurer le temps de propagation des ultrasons
DE2636856A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur zerstoerungsfreien bewertung von klebverbindungen in realzeit
EP2954338B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour tester un circuit de commutation
DE2655415C3 (de) Vorrichtung zum Überwachen eines Widers tandspunktschweißvorgangs
DE2636857A1 (de) Schweisstellen-bewertungsverfahren und -vorrichtung
EP1518112A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour determiner la taille d'une fissure dans une piece par controle par impulsions ultrasonores
DE202011005427U1 (de) Vorrichtung zum Messen der Laufzeit eines Ultraschallsignals in einer strömenden Flüssigkeit
DE2646541C2 (de) Verfahren zur Auslösung von Sendeimpulsen bei der Dickenmessung von Prüfstücken mittels Ultraschallsignalen
DE2629244C3 (de) Schweißstellen-Bewertungsverfahren und -vorrichtung
WO2012104316A1 (fr) Dispositif permettant de tester des composants électroniques comprenant au moins une couche intégrée contenant du métal, procédé, et utilisation d'un convertisseur électromagnétique-acoustique
DE3903396A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur ultraschall-dickenmessung und pruefeinrichtung fuer letztere
EP0281035B1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance pour la détermination électrodynamique de l'épaisseur et des erreurs
DE2803045A1 (de) Schaltvorrichtung zur pruefung von werkstuecken nach dem ultraschall-impuls- echo-verfahren
DE2059343A1 (de) Anordnung zur UEberwachung der Resonanzfrequenz eines Koerpers
EP0116901A2 (fr) Appareil de contrôle ultrasonore
EP0354214B1 (fr) Procede de determination de la duree electrique de trajets de signaux
DE102005059202B4 (de) Spaltmessvorrichtung
CH456191A (de) Verfahren zur Temperaturmessung und Einrichtung zur Ausführung des Verfahrens
DE3347420C2 (de) Verfahren zur Messung des zeitlichen Abstandes von zwei elektrischen Impulsen und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
EP3992583B1 (fr) Capteur de déplacement magnétostrictif
EP0981202A2 (fr) Procédé de calibrage de la fréquence d'émission d'un détecteur de proximité à ultrasons et détecteur de proximité à ultrasons avec calibrage de la fréquence d'émission
EP2765432A2 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de contrôle d'un circuit de commutation d'un terminal
DE3724402C2 (de) Verfahren zur Prüfung der Störfestigkeit von mit Filtern am Eingang ausgerüsteten elektronischen Geräten
DE4414030C1 (de) Verfahren zur Messung der Dicke einer Schicht und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
DE3404492A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur ultraschallpruefung

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB LI NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900625

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19910429

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB LI NL SE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19930228

Year of fee payment: 6

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3878267

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19930325

ET Fr: translation filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19930519

Year of fee payment: 6

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 19930505

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19940223

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19940224

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19940228

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19940228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19940901

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19950116

Year of fee payment: 8

EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 88102926.8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19950228

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SIEMENS A.G.

Effective date: 19950228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19951031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19960226

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19960226

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19970213

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980227

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19980420

Year of fee payment: 11

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 88102926.8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19991201