BRPI9814318B1 - process for insect control in useful transgenic plant crops expressing the cry1ab protein - Google Patents

Abstract

patent: <b> "Use of macrolides in pest control." <d> A pest control process with macrolides is now described; more specifically (a) a process of pest control in and on useful transgenic plant crops such as, for example, maize, cereals, soya, tomatoes, cotton, potatoes, rice and mustard with a macrolide compound, characterized in that a pesticidal composition comprising a free-form or salt-useful macrolide compound and at least one pesticide is applied to pests or their environment, in particular to the crop plant itself. help. (b) A process of protecting propagation material and plant organs formed at a later time against pest attack, characterized in that a pesticide comprising as pesticide-active compound, at least one macrolide-compound as an active ingredient, is employed. and at least one auxiliary in close spatial proximity to or spatially in conjunction with, planting or applying propagating material to the planting or sowing site; c) a process for controlling wood pests and molluscs with a macrolide compound, wherein a pesticidally active amount of a pesticidal compound comprising as a pesticidally active compound at least one macrolide compound in free or salt form whereas it can be used in agrochemicals as an active ingredient and at least one auxiliary is applied to pests or their environment; the corresponding use of these compounds, corresponding pesticides whose active ingredient is selected from these compounds, a process for the preparation and use of these compositions and plant propagation material which is protected in this way from pest attack.

Description

Patent Descriptive Report for "INSECT CONTROL PROCESS IN USEFUL TRANSGENIC PLANT CROPS EXPRESSING CRY1AB PROTEIN". The present invention relates to a pest control process with macrolide compounds; more specifically (A) a novel pest control process on transgenic plant crops useful with a macrolide compound; (B) the process of protecting plant propagating material and plant organs formed at a later occasion against pest attack with such a macrolide compound; and (C) a process of controlling wood pests and molluscs with a macrolide compound.

Certain pest control processes are proposed in the literature. However, these processes are not completely satisfactory in the field of pest control, because there is a demand for the supply of other processes for pest control and control, in particular insects and representative of the order Acarina or for plant protection, especially plants. of culture. This object is achieved according to the invention by providing the present process. (A) A first aspect of the present invention therefore relates to a process of pest control in useful transgenic plant crops such as, for example, maize, cereal, soybean, tomato, cotton, potato, rice and mustard oil, characterized in that a pesticidal composition comprising a macrolide compound, in particular abamectin, in free form or in the form of a useful agrochemical salt and at least one auxiliary to pests is applied. its environment, in particular to the crop plant itself; the use of the composition in question and the propagation material of transgenic plants that have been treated with it.

Surprisingly, it has now been found that the use of a macrolide compound for pest control in useful transgenic plants containing - for example - one or more genes that express a pesticide, particularly insecticide, acaricide, nematocide or fungicidally active ingredient or are tolerant against herbicides has a synergistic effect. It is highly surprising that the use of a macrolide compound in combination with a transgenic plant exceeds the expected T-a_5 additive effect in principle on the pests to be controlled and thus extends the range of action of the macrolide compound and the active principle expressed by the transgenic plant. In particular in two respects: In particular, that within the scope of the invention (A) the pesticidal activity of a macrolide compound in combination with the effect expressed by the useful transgenic plant is not only additive compared to the pesticidal activities of the macrolide compound alone. and from the transgenic crop plant only, as might usually be expected, but a synergistic effect is present. The term "synergistic" however should by no means be understood under this association as being restricted to pesticidal activity, but the term .... also ... refers to other advantageous properties of the process according to the invention compared to the macrolide compound alone and with the useful transgenic plant only. Examples of such advantageous properties that may be mentioned are: extension of the pesticidal spectrum of action on other pests, for example on resistant strains; the reduction of the macrolide compound application or sufficient pest control with the aid of the compositions according to the invention even at an application rate of the macrolide compound alone and the useful transgenic plant are only entirely ineffective; greater safety in culture; Improved quality of production such as ... more. high nutrient or oil content, better fiber quality, longer shelf life, reduced content of toxic products such as mycotoxins, reduced content of residues or unfavorable constituents of any kind or better digestibility; improved tolerance to unfavorable temperatures, withdrawals or salt content of water; better assimilation rates such as nutrient uptake, water uptake and photosynthesis; favorable crop properties such as altered aerial foliage, reduced vegetative growth, higher yields, favorable seed shape / seed thickness or germination properties, altered colonialization by saprophytes or epiphytes, reduced senescence, improved phytoalexin production, improved accelerated ripening, increased flowering, reduced capsule drop and fragmentation, better attraction to beneficial and predators, increased pollination, reduced bird attraction or other advantages known to those skilled in the art.

The macrolide compounds used according to parts (A), (B) and (C) of the invention are known to those skilled in the art. They are the classes of substances that are disclosed as milbemycins and avermectins, for example in US-P-5,077,298, US-P-4310519, German Offenle-gungsschrift 2,717,040 or US-P-4,427,663. It is also to be understood that these macrolides according to the invention mean derivatives of these substances, that is, for example, milbemycin oxime, moxidectin, ivermectin, abamectin, emamectin and doramectin and also spinosyns of the formula wherein R 1, R 2 R3, R4, R5 and Rg independently of each other are hydrogen or a substituted or unsubstituted alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, aryl or heterocyclyl group and the A and B substructures independently of one another mean that the two atoms of to which each of these substructures is attached, are linked by a single bond, a double bond or a single bond and an epoxy bridge, in free form or, where appropriate, in the form of salt which may be used agrochemically. .

Within the scope of the invention (IA) abamectin is preferred. Abamectin is a mixture of avermectin B1a and avermectin Bjh and is described, for example, in The Pesticide Manual, 10thEd. (1994), The British Crop Protection Council, London, page 3.

Also preferred within the scope of the invention (A) is emamectin * which is 4 ”-Doxy-4” -epi-N-methylamino avermectin Bu-B-ia, known from US-P-4,874,749 and as MK- 244 described in the Journal of Organic Chemistry, Vol. 59 (1994), pages 7704-7708. Especially useful agrochemical salts of emamectin are described in US-P-5,288,710.

Also preferred within the scope of the invention (A) is the group of compounds consisting of spinosines and their derivatives; the group of compounds consisting of naturally occurring spinosyns or the group of compounds consisting of naturally occurring spinosyn derivatives. Preferably, the active ingredient may comprise, within the scope of the subject matter of the invention (A), spinosine A; espinpin D; or a mixture composed of spinosine A and spinosine D; Especially preferred is spinosad, spinosad is known from The Pesticide Manual, II Ed. (1997), The British Crop Protection Council, London, pages 1272-1273.

Agrochemically compatible salts of the macrolide compounds are, for example, acid addition salts of inorganic and organic acids, in particular hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, perchloric acid, phosphoric acid , formic acid, acetic acid, trifluoroacetic acid, oxalic acid, malonic acid, toluenesulfonic acid or benzoic acid. Preferred within the scope of the present invention is a composition per se comprising as active ingredient abamectin or spinosad in free form and emamectin as the benzoate salt.

The transgenic plants used according to the invention (A) are plants or propagating material thereof, which are transformed by recombinant DNA technology in such a way that they are - for example - capable of synthesizing selectively acting toxins. It is known, for example, from toxin-producing invertebrates, especially from the phylum Arthropoda, as can be obtained from Bacillus thuringiensis strains: or as they are known from plants such as lectins; or in the alternative capable of expressing a herbicidal or fungicidal resistance. Examples of such toxins or transgenic plants which are capable of synthesizing such toxins have been disclosed, for example, in EP-A-0 374 753, WO 93/07278, WO 95/34656, EP-A-0.427.529 and EP A-451,878 and are incorporated by reference in this patent application.

Processes for generating such transgenic plants are widely known to those skilled in the art and are described, for example, in the publications mentioned above.

Toxins which may be expressed by such transgenic plants include, for example, toxins such as proteins that have insecticidal properties and which are expressed by transgenic plants, for example Bacillus cereus proteins or Bacillus popliae proteins; or Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) endotoxins such as CrylA (a), CrylA (b), CrylA (c), CrylIA, CrylllA, CrylllB2 orCytA; VIP1; VIP2; VIP3: or insecticidal proteins from nematodes that colonize bacteria such as Photorhabdus spp or Xe-norhabdus spp such as Photorhabdus luminescens, Xenorhabdus nema-tophilus etc; proteinase inhibitors, such as trypsin inhibitors, serine protease inhibitors, patatin, cystatin, papain inhibitors; ribosome inactivating proteins (RIP) such as ricin, maize RIP, abrina, lu-fine, saporin or brydine; plant lectins such as pea lectins, barley lectins or anemone lectins; or agglutinins; animal-produced toxins such as scorpion toxins, spider poisons, wasp poisons, and other insect-specific neurotoxins; Stemide metabolism enzymes such as 3-hydroxysteroid oxidase, UDP-glycosyl transferase ecdiesteroid, cholesterol oxidases, ecdisone inhibitors, HMG-COAreductase, ion channel blockers such as sodium and calcium, juvenile hormone esterase, diuretic hormone receptors, stilbene synthase, bibenzyl synthase, chitinases and glucanases.

Examples of known transgenic plants that comprise one or more genes that encode insecticide resistance and express one or more toxins are as follows: KnockOut® (maize), YieldGard® (maize); NuCOTN 33B® (cotton), Bollgard® (cotton), NewLeaf® (gowns), NatureGard® and Protecta®. The following table comprises other examples of GM targets and culture phenotypes that have tolerance to pests primarily insects, mites, nematodes, viruses, bacteria, and diseases that are tolerant to specific herbicides or herbicide classes.

Table A1: Crop: Corn Affected target or principle (s) Crop phenotype / expressed (s) Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulphonylureas, Imidazolinones, Triazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxybenzoates, AcetylCoA Phthalates Carboxylase (ACCase) Acylcarboxylic Acids, cyclohexanediones Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxigenase (HPPD) Isoxazoles such as Isoxaflutol or Isoxaclortol, Triones such as mesotrione or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase Phosphinothricin O-Methyl transferase Glutamine Synthase Adhesase Leptin Synthesis Phosphates synthesis

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors 3,5-Dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-Phosphinthate Sulphosphosphate Glyphosate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulfosate Affected Target or Principle (s) Culture Phenotype / Expression (s) Tolerance to Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles etc .

Citochrome P450 for example P450 SU1 Xenobiotics and herbicides such as Sulphonylureas Dimboa biosynthesis (Bx1 gene) Helminthosporium turcicum, Rhopalosiphum maydis, Diplodia maydis, Ostrinia nubilalis, lepi-doptera sp. CMIII (basic small corn seed peptide) plant pathogens eg fusarium, alternaria, sclerotine, Corn - SAFP (zeamatine) plant pathogens eg fusarium, alternaria, sclerotine, rhizoctonia, chaeto-mium, phycomices Gene Hm1 Cochliobulus Chitinases Plant Pathogens Glucanases Plant Pathogens Coverage proteins such as dwarf maize virus, dwarf maize chlorotic virus Bacillus thuringiensis toxins, VIP 3, lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, Bacillus cereus toxins, Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus nematode toxins, eg ostrinia nubilalis, heliothis zea, cereal caterpillars eg spodop-tera frugiperda, root caterpillars Affected target or principle (s) Crop phenotype (s) Tolerance to maize , sesamia sp., black caterpillar, asian corn borer, gorges 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, nematodes , for example, ostrian nubilalis, heliothis zea, cereal caterpillars eg spo-doptera frugiperda, maize root caterpillars, sesamia sp., black caterpillar, Asian corn borer, peroxidase lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, eg ostrian nubilalis, heliothis zea, cereal caterpillars eg spo-doptera frugiperda, maize root caterpillars, sesamia sp., black caterpillar, Asian corn borer, weevils Aminopeptidase inhibitors eg Leucine aminopeptidase inhibitor ( LAPI) lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, eg ostrinia nubilalis, heliothis zea, cereal caterpillars eg spo-doptera frugiperda, corn rootworm, sesamia sp., Black caterpillar, weevil weevil, weevils Target affected or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Limonene synthase tolerance maize rootworm Lectinas lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, eg ostrinia nubilalis, he liothis zea, cereal caterpillars eg spo-doptera frugiperda, maize root caterpillars, sesamia sp., black caterpillar, asian corn borer, weevils Protease inhibitors eg cystatin, patatin, virgiferin, CPTI weevils, root caterpillars ribosome inactivating protein lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, eg ostrinia nubilalis, heliothis zea, cereal caterpillars eg spo-doptera frugiperda, corn rootworm, sesamia sp. asian maize, weevils 5C9 corn polypeptide lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, eg ostrian nubilalis, heliothis zea, cereal caterpillars eg spo-doptera frugiperda, corn rootworm, sesamia sp., black caterpillar, asian corn borer, weevils Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Tolerance to HMG-CoA reductase lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, eg ostrony nubila lis, heliothis zea, cereal caterpillars eg spo-doptera frugiperda, corn rootworms, sesamia sp., black caterpillar, weevil, weevils Table A2: Crop Wheat Affected target or principle (s) Crop phenotype / expressed Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulfonylureas, Imidazolinones, Triazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxy benzoates, AcetylCoA Carboxylase (ACCase) Acids Aryloxyphenoxyalkonecarboxyloxythienesulfonylhexothiazole dioxanes or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase Phosphinothricin O-Methyl transferase altered levels of lignin Glutamine synthetase Glufosinate, Bialafos Adenylsuccinate Liase (ADSL) IMP and AMP synthesis inhibitors

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors Affected Target or Principle (s) Culture Phenotype (s) Nitrilase Tolerance 3,5-dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynyl and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-phosphoshiquimate Glyphosate or sulfosate synthase (EPSPS) Glyphosate oxidoreductase Glyphosate or sulfosate Protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl ethers, cyclic imides, phenylpyrazol derivatives, phenopyrazole, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example P450 SU1 Xenobiotics and herbicides such as Sulphonylureas Antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP plant pathogens e.g. septoria and fusarium glucose oxidase plant pathogens e.g. fusarium, septoria synthesis genes of pyrrolnitrin plant pathogens for example fusarium septin, trionine kinases plant pathogens eg fusarium, septoria and other diseases polypeptide eliciting hypersensitive response plant pathogens eg fusarium, septoria and other diseases Genes that acquire systemic resistance (SAR) viral, bacterial, fungal, nematode pathogens Guitinases Plant pathogens Glucanases Plant pathogens Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Double-stranded ribonuclease virus tolerance such as BYDV and MSMV

virus coat proteins such as BYDV and MSMV Bacillus thuringiensis toxins, VIP 3, lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, Bacillus cereus toxins, nematode toxins, Bacillus Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, coleoptera dipeoptera, coleoptera, , coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, Aminopeptidase inhibitors by lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, example, Leucine inhibitor nematodes, aminopeptidase Lectins lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, aphids protease inhibitors, leptidine, cytatin, protease, cytatin coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, aphids lepidoptera ribosome-inactivating protein, coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, aphids HMG-CoA reductase lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, for example, ostrian-nia nubilalis, eg spoiartis cerea, doptera frugiperda, corn rootworm, sesamia sp., black caterpillar, corn borer asian island, weevils Table A3: Crop Barley Affected target or principle (s) Crop phenotype / expressed Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulphonylureas, Imidazolinones, T-thiazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxybenzoates, AcetylCoA Carboxylase Phthalates (ACCase) Aryloxyphenoxyalkanecarboxylic acids, Cyclohexanediones Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxigenase (HPPD) Isoxazoles such as Isoxaflutol or Isoxaciortol, Trionas such as mesotrione or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin Acetylase Glucosylasease Synthases Adenosine levels and AMP

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors 3,5-Dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-Phosphinthate Sulphosphosphate Glyphosate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example P450 SU1 Xenobiotics and herbicides such as Sulphonylureas Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP plant pathogens eg septoria and fusarium glucose oxidase plant pathogens eg fusarium , septoria pyrrolnitrin synthesis genes plant pathogens for example fusarium, septoria serine trionine kinases plant pathogens for example fusarium, septoria and other diseases Polypeptide that causes hypersensitive response plant pathogens for example fusarium, septoria and other diseases Genes that acquire systemic resistance (SAR) viral, bacterial, fungal, nematode pathogens Chitinases plant pathogens Glucanases double stranded ribonuclease plant pathogens such as BYDV and MSMV

virus coat proteins such as BYDV and MSMV Bacillus thuringiensis toxins, VIP 3, lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, Bacillus cereus toxins, nematode toxins, Bacillus Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, coleoptera dipeoptera, coleoptera, , coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Aminopeptidase Inhibitors by lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, example, Leucine nematode inhibitor, aminopeptidase Lectins lepidoptera, coleoptera , aphids Protease inhibitors eg lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, cystatin, patatin, virgiferin, CPTI nematodes, aphids ribosome inactivating protein lepidoptera, coleoptera, diptera, nematodes, aphids HMG-CoA reductase lepidoptera, coleoptera, ape Table A4: Crop Rice Affected target or principle (s) Crop Phenotype / ex Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulphonylureas, Imidazolinones, Thiazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxy benzoates, Phthalates AcetylCoA Carboxylase (ACCase) Aryloxyphenoxyalkylthiosulfonylhexothiazole hydroxysulfonate-hydroxysulfonate or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase Phosphinothricin O-Methyl transferase altered levels of lignin Glutamine synthetase Glufosinate, Bialafos Adenylsuccinate Liase (ADSL) IMP and AMP synthesis inhibitors

Adenylsuccinate synthase Adenyl succinate synthesis inhibitors Target affected or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Tolerance to anthranilate synthase Tryptophan synthesis and catabolism inhibitors Nitrylase 3,5-dihalo-4-hydroxybenzonitria such as Bromoxynyl and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-phosphoshiquimate Glyphosate or sulfosate synthase (EPSPS) Glyphosate oxidoreductase Glyphosate or sulfosate Protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl ethers, cyclic imides, phenylpyrazol derivatives, phenopyrazole, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example P450 SU1 Xenobiotics and herbicides such as Sulphonylureas Antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP plant pathogens glucose oxidase plant pathogens pyrrolnitrin synthesis genes plant pathogens serine / threonine kinases plant pathogens quinine plant aminogens plant pathogens eg bacterial leaf pustule and rice pustule, inducible phytoalexins plant pathogens for example bacterial leaf pustule and rice pustule B-1,3-glucanase antisense plant pathogens eg leaf pustule bacterial and rice pustule recipient plant pathogens eg bacterial leaf pustule and rice pustule Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Polypeptide tolerance that causes response hypersensitive plant pathogens Genes that acquire resistance agents pat viral, bacterial systemic (SAR) ogenic, fungal, nematode Chitinases plant pathogens eg bacterial leaf pustule and rice pustule Glucanases double stranded ribonuclease plant pathogens such as BYDV and MSMV

virus coat proteins such as BYDV and MSMV Bacillus thuringiensis toxins, VIP 3, lepidoptera, for example Bacillus Photorabdus toxin borer and stem, coleoptera, for example, Xenorhabdus rice water weevil, rice hoppers for example , brown jumping rice insect 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, eg stem borer, coleoptera eg rice water weevil, jumping rice insect eg brown jumping rice peroxidase lepidoptera insect, eg stem borer, coleoptera eg rice water weevil, rice jumping insect eg brown rice jumping insect Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Aminopeptidase Inhibitors by lepidoptera eg borer borer eg stem inhibitor leucine, coleoptera, for example, aminopeptidase rice water weevil, rice jumping insects eg salt insect brown rice tiller Lectinas lepidoptera eg stem borer, coleoptera eg rice water weevil, rice jumping insect eg brown jumping rice insect Protease inhibitors lepidoptera eg stem borer, coleoptera eg eg rice water weevil, rice bouncing insects eg brown rice bouncing insect ribosome inactivating protein lepidoptera eg stem borer, coleoptera eg rice water weevil rice jumping insects eg brown hopper rice insect HMG-CoA reductase lepidoptera eg stem borer, coleoptera eg rice water weevil, hopper rice insect eg brown hopper rice Table A5: Soybean Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulfonylureas, Imidazolinones, Thiazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxybenzoates, F taletos acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) ariloxifenoxialcanocarbo- xílicos acids, cyclohexanediones Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) Isoxazoles such as isoxaflutole or Isoxaclortol, triones such as mesotrione or sulcotrione phosphinothricin acetyl transferase phosphinothricin O-Methyl transferase altered lignin levels Glutamine synthetase Glufosinate, Bialaphos adenylosuccinate lyase ( ADSL) IMP and AMP Synthesis Inhibitors

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors 3,5-Dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-Phosphosphosate Glucosate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as Sulphonylureas Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP bacteria and pathogens such as fusarium, sclerotinia, stem oxalate oxidase rot and pathogens such as fusarium, sclerotinia, stem rot glucose glucose oxidase bacteria and pathogens such as fusarium, sclerotinia, stem rot gene synthesis of pyrrolnitrin bacteria and pathogens such as fusarium, sclerotinia, stem rot serine / threonine kinases bacteria and pathogens such as fusarium, sclerotinia, stem rot Phenylalanine ammonia lyase bacteria and pathogens such as fusarium, sclerotinia, stem rot phytoalexins plant pathogens e.g. leaf bacterial pustule and rice pustule B-1,3- glucanase antisense pathogens such as bacterial leaf pustule and recipient rice kinase pustule bacteria and pathogens such as fusarium, sclerotinia, stem rot Affected target or principle (s) Culture / expressed phenotype (s) Response-tolerant Polypeptide hypersensitive plant pathogens Genes that acquire resistance viral, bacterial (SAR) pathogens rians, fungal, nematodes Chitinases bacteria and pathogens such as fusarium, sclerotinia, stem rot Glucanases bacteria and pathogens such as fusarium, sclerotinia, rot stem cell double strand ribonuclease such as BYDV and MSMV

virus coat proteins such as BYDV and MSMV Bacillus thuringiensis toxins, VIP 3, lepidoptera, coleoptera, aphids Bacillus cereus toxins, Bacillus photorabdus toxins and Xenorhabdus 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, coleoptera, aphid peropteraeoptera coleoptera Aminopeptidase lepidoptera, coleoptera, aphids eg from Leucine aminopeptidase inhibitor Lectins lepidoptera, coleoptera, aphids Protease inhibitors eg lepidoptera, coleoptera, aphids virgifenin ribosome inactivating protein lepidoptera, coleoptera, coleoptera, coleoptera nematodes eg root-knot nematodes and cyst nematodes Nematode cyst outbreak stimulus nematode cyst Affected target or principle (s) Culture / expressed phenotype (s) Tolerance to anti-feeding principles Nematode roots and nematodes nematode cyst Ta bela A £: Potatoes Potato Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Aeetolactate synthase (ALS) Sulphonylureas, Imidazolinones, Triazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxy benzoates, AcetylCoA Phthalates Carboxylase (ACCase) Aryloxycarboxylic Acids Cyclohexanediones Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxigenase (HPPD) Isoxazoles such as Isoxaflutol or Isoxaclortol, Triones such as mesotrione or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase Phosphinothricin O-Methyl transferase Altered levels of lignin Glutamine Synthase Adhesis Synthase Biosynthesis

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors 3,5-Dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxinyl and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-Phosphinthate Sulphosphosate Sodium EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as Sulphonylureas Polyphenol oxidase or Polyphenol oxidase antisense black spot Metallothionein bacterial and fungal pathogens such Phytophtora Ribonuclease Phytophtora, Verticillium, Rhizoctonia Antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Phytophtora oxalate oxidase Bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Phytophtora, Verticillium phytogeny Rhizoctonia genes, Rhizoctonia synthesis of pyrrolnitrin bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Phytophtora, Verticillium, Rhizoctonia serine / threonine kinases bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Phytophtora, Verticillium, Rhizoctonia Cecropin B bacteria such as co rynebacterium sepedonicum, Erwinia caro-tovora Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Phytophtora, Verticillium, Rhizoctonia Affected target or principle (s) Phenotypic expression (s) Tolerance to phytoalexins' bacterial pathogens fungal pathogens such as Phytophtora, Verticiliium, Rhizoctonia B-1,3-glucanase antisense bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Phytophtora, Verticiliium, Rhizoctonia kinase receptor pathogens Bacterial and fungal such as Phytophtora, Verticiliium Bacterial pathogens Rhizoctonia hypersensitive and fungal response such as Phytophtora, Verticiliium, Rhizoctonia Genes that acquire resistance to viral, bacterial, pathogenic (SAR) pathogens Riano, fungal, nematodes Chitinases bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Phytophtora, Verticiliium, bacterial pathogens Rhizoctonia fungal ian and fungal such as Phytophtora, Verticiliium, Rhizoctonia gene 49 bacterial pathogen resistance response to fungal disease and fungal fungal such as Phytophtora, Verticiliium, Rhizoctonia trans aldolase antisense black spots Glucanases bacterial and fungal pathogenic agents such as Fungal Verticiliium, Rhizoctonia Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) ___________________________ Double-stranded ribonuclease virus tolerance such as PLRV, PVY and TRV

virus coat proteins such as PLRV, PVY and TRV

17 kDa or 60 kDa virus proteins such as PLRV, PVY and TRV

virus nuclear inclusion proteins such as PLRV, PVY and TRV example a or b Pseudoubiquitin viruses such as PLRV, PVY and TRV

Virus replicates such as PLRV, PVY and TRV

Bacillus thuringiensis VIP 3 toxins, coleoptera for example colorado potato beetle, aphids Bacillus cereus toxins, coleoptera toxins for example colorado potato beetle Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus, aphids 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase coleoptera for example colorado potato beetle, aphids Peroxidase coleoptera eg colorado potato beetle, aphids coleoptera Aminopeptidase inhibitors eg beetle example, colorado potato aminopeptidase inhibitor, Leucina stilbene synthase coleoptera aphids eg colorado potato beetle, aphids Lectins coleoptera eg beetle colorado potato beetle, aphids Protease inhibitors eg coleoptera eg cystatin beetle, colorado potato patatin, aphids ribosome inactivating protein coleoptera eg colorado potato beetle, aphids HMG-CoA reductase lepidoptera, coleoptera, aphids hatching stimulus of the nematode cyst the nematode cyst Barnase nematodes eg root knot nematodes and cyst nematodes Anti-feeding principles nematode roots and cyst nematodes nematodes Table A7: Crop Tomatoes Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulphonylureas, Imidazolinones, Thiazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxybenzoates, Phthalates AcetylCoA Carboxylase (ACCase) Aryloxyphenoxyalkocarboxyl hydroxide-thiosulfonylhexaphosphoxothiazole hydroxide-thiosulfonate or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase Phosphinothricin O-Methyl transferase altered levels of lignin Glutamine synthetase Glufosinate, Bialafos Adenylsuccinate Liase (ADSL) IMP and AMP synthesis inhibitors

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors 3,5-Dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-Phosphinthate Sulphosphosphate Glyphosate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as Sulphonylureas Polyphenol oxidase or Polyphenol antisense black spot injury Affected target or principle (s) Phenotypic expression (s) Tolerance to Metaiotionein bacterial and fungal pathogens such such as phytophtora Ribonuclease Phytophtora, Verticillium, Rhizoctonia Antifungal AlyAFP polypeptide bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, powdery mildew, crown root, leaf mold etc. oxalate oxidase bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacteria-na stain, fusarium, sof rot, downy mildew, crown root, leaf mold etc. glucose oxidase bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, downy mildew, crown root, leaf mold etc. pyrrolnitrin synthesis genes bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacteria-na stain, fusarium, sof rot, powdery mildew, crown root, leaf mold etc. serine / threonine kinases bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial spot I, fusarium, sof rot, mildew powder, crown root, leaf mold etc.

Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Cecropin B tolerance Bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, powdery mildew, crown root, leaf mold etc.

Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, mildew powder, crown root, leaf mold etc. genes Cf for example Cf 9 Cf 5 Cf 4 Cf 2 leaf mildew Osmotine alternaria solani Alpha Hordotionine bacteria Systeine bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, mildew powder, crown root, mold mildew sheet etc.

Polygalacturonase inhibitors bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, mildew powder, crown root, leaf mold etc.

Prf regulatory gene bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, downy mildew, crown root, leaf mold etc. 12 fusarium resistance locus fusarium Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to phytoalexins bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, powdery mildew, crown root, mold on the sheet etc. B-1,3-glucanase antisense bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, mildew powder, crown root, leaf mold etc. receptor kinase bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, downy mildew, crown root, leaf mold etc.

Response-causing polypeptide hypersensitive and fungal bacterial pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, mildew powder, crown root, leaf mold, etc.

Genes that acquire resistance to bacterial, fungal, nematode viral pathogens (SAR) pathogens bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, mildew powder, crown root, leaf mold etc.

Barnase bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, rot Affected target or principle (s) Culture / expressed phenotype (s) Soft tolerance, powdery mildew, crown root, leaf mold etc.

Glucanases bacterial and fungal pathogens such as bacterial stain, fusarium, sof rot, downy mildew, crown root, leaf mold etc. double stranded ribonuclease viruses such as PLRV, PVY and To-MoV virus coat proteins such as PLRV, PVY and To-MoV 17 kDa or 60 kDa virus proteins such as PLRV, PVY and To-MoV nuclear inclusion proteins by viruses such as PLRV, PVY and example a or b ToMoV

TRV Nucleoprotein

Pseudoubiquitin viruses such as PLRV, PVY and To-MoV

Viruses such as PLRV, PVY and ToMoV are replicated.

Bacillus thuringiensis VIP 3 toxins, lepidoptera eg heliothis, aphid whiteflies Bacillus cereus toxins, aphid toxins Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera eg helianthis aphids Peroxidase lepidoptera mosquitoes eg white heliothis by lepidoptera eg heliothis, Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Tolerance to example, Aminopeptidase inhibitor Leucine aphid whiteflies Lectins lepidoptera eg Heliothis, aphid whiteflies Protease inhibitors eg lepidoptera heliothis, cystatin, patatin aphid whitefly ribosome inactivating protein lepidoptera eg heliothis, aphid whitefly stylbene synthase lepidoptera eg heliothis, aphid whitefly HMG-CoA redepase lepidoptera eg heliothis, aphid whitefly nematode cyst nematode cyst Barnase nematodes nematode eg root-knot nematodes and nematode cyst Nematode antialimentation principles eg nematode root-knot nematodes and cyst Table A8: Affected chilli Target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulfonylureas, Imidazolinones, Thiazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxy benzoates, Phthalates AcetylCoA Carboxylase (ACCase) Aryloxyphenoxyalkylcarboxyloxyhexaphosphatylhexaphosphateshexaphosphateshexaphosphates oxydiphosphates Triads such as mesotrione or sulcotrione Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase Fosphinothricin O-Methyl transferase altered levels of lignin Glutamine synthase Glufosinate, Bialafos Adenylsuccinate Liase (ADSL) IMP Inhibitors synthesis and AMP

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors 3,5-Dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-Phosphinthate Sulphosphosphate Glyphosate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as Sulphonylureas _ Polyphenol oxidase or Polyphenol antisense and fungal bacterial pathogens Metallothionein bacterial and fungal pathogens Ribonuclease Bacterial pathogens and fungal pathogens Oxyphosphates Antifungal agents Fungal agents bacterial and fungal pathogens glucose oxidase bacterial and fungal pathogens Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Tolerance to pyrrolnitrin synthesis genes bacterial and fungal pathogens serine / threonine kinases bacterial and fungal pathogens Cecropin B bacterial and fungal pathogens mold rot on leaf etc.

Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) bacterial and fungal pathogens Cf genes eg Cf 9 Cf 5 Cf 4 Cf 2 bacterial and fungal pathogens Osmotine bacterial and fungal pathogens Alpha Hordothionein bacterial and fungal pathogens Sistemin Bacterial and fungal pathogens polygalacturonase bacterial and fungal pathogens Prf regulator gene bacterial and fungal pathogens 12 fusarium resistance loci fusarium phytoalexins bacterial and fungal pathogens B-1,3-glucanase antisense bacterial and fungal pathogens receptors bacterial and fungal pathogens Polypeptide responsive to bacterial pathogens Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to hypersensitive and fungal Genes that acquire resistance to bacterial, bacterial, pathogenic (SAR) pathogens nematodes Chitinases Bacterial and fungal pathogens Barnase Bacterial and fungal pathogens Glucanases Bacterial and fungal pathogens Double stranded virus ribonuclease such as CMV, TEV

virus coat proteins such as CMV, TEV

17 kDa or 60 kDa virus proteins such as CMV, TEV

virus nuclear inclusion proteins such as CMV, TEV example a or b or Pseudoubiquitin Nucleoprotein viruses such as CMV, TEV

Virus replicates such as CMV, TEV

Bacillus thuringiensis VIP 3 toxins, lepidoptera, white flies aphids Bacillus cereus toxins, Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus toxins 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, white flies aphids Peroxidase lepidoptera, Aoptera white flies example, leucine aphid Aminopeptidase inhibitor Lectins lepidoptera, aphid whitefly Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Protease tolerance eg lepidoptera, cystatin whitefly, patathine aphid protein inactivator ribosome lepidoptera, aphid white flies stilbene synthase lepidoptera, aphid white flies HMG-CoA redepase lepidoptera, aphid white flies Stimulus of cyst nematode cyst nematodes Barnase nematodes for example nematodes and root nodules Principles of nematode antifeeding for example nematodes of the nematode root node and cyst Table A9: Culture Grapes Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulphonylureas, Imidazolinones, Triazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxy benzoates, AcetylCoA Carboxyl Phthalates Aryloxyphenoxyalkanecarboxylic acids, Cyclohexanediones Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxigenase (HPPD) Isoxazoles such as Isoxaflutol or Isoxaclortol, Trionas such as mesotrione or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin Acetyl transferase Phytosulfate levels Synthase phosphates culture / expressed Adenylsuccinate Liase Tolerance (ADSL) IMP and AMP synthesis inhibitors

Adenylsuccinate synthase Adenyl succinate synthesis inhibitors Anthranilate synthase Tryptophan synthesis and catabolism inhibitors Nitriiasis 3,5-dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynyl and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-phosphosphosate or glyphosphosate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as Sulphonylureas Polyphenol oxidase or Polyphenol oxidase antisense and fungal bacterial pathogens such as Botrytis and powdery mildew Metallothionein bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and bacterial pathogens Rib and bacterial pathogens fungal agents like Botrytis and downy mildew Antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and downy mildew oxalate oxidase bacterial and fungal pathogens like Botrytis and downy mildew Target affected or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance glucose oxidase bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and downy powder pyrrolnitrin synthesis genes bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and downy powder serine / threonine kinases bacterial and fungal pathogens like Botrytis and downy powder Cecr opinion B bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and powdery mildew Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and powdery mildew Cf genes eg Cf 9 Cf 5 Cf 4 Cf 2 bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and downy mildew Osmotine bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and downy mildew Alpha Hordothinine bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and downy mildew Sistemine bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and downy mildew Bacterial fungal polygenic pathogens and inhibitors Botrytis and powdery mildew Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Prf-regulating gene tolerance bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and powdery mildew phytoalexins bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and powdery mildew B -1,3-glucanase antisense pathogens Bacterial and fungal such as Botrytis and downy mildew receptors Receptor bacterial and fungal pathogens as Botrytis and downy mildew Polypeptide that elicits response Hypersensitive and fungal bacterial pathogens like Botrytis and downy mildew Genes that acquire resistance viral pathogens, systemic bacte ) ryan, fungal, nematode Chitinases bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and downy mildew Barnase bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Botrytis and downy mildew Glucanases bacterial and fungal pathogens like Botrytis and downy mildew double stranded ribonuclease coat proteins 17 kDa or 60 kDa protein virus Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Tolerance to nuclear inclusion proteins by virus a or b or Nucleoprotein Pseudoubiquitin virus Replicase virus Bacillus thuringiensis toxins VIP 3,lepidoptera, aphids Bacillus cereus toxins, lepidoptera toxins, aphids Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, aphids Peroxidase lepidoptera, aphids Lepidoptera Aminopeptidase Inhibitors, Example Aphidine Leptidase Inhibitors, Aepidase Aminopeptide Inhibitors lepidoptera, cystatin aphids, patatin rhinosome inactivating protein lepidoptera, aphids stilbene synthase lepidoptera, aphids, diseases HMG-CoA reductase lepidoptera, aphids nematode cyst hatching stimulus nematodes Barnase nematodes and root-knot nematodes general diseases CBI root knot nematodes Antifeeding principles nematodes for example root knot nematodes and cyst nematodes Table A10: Crop Oil Seed Rape Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance Acetolactate synthase (A LS) sulfonylureas, imidazolinones, triazolopyrimidines, pyrimidyloxy-benzoates, Ftaletos acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) ariloxifenoxialcanocarbo- xílicos acids, cyclohexanediones Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) Isoxazoles such as isoxaflutole or Isoxaclortol, triones such as mesotrione or sulcotrione phosphinothricin acetyl transferase phosphinothricin O-methyl transferase altered levels of lignin Glutamine synthetase Glufosinate, Bialafos Adenylsuccinate Liase (ADSL) IMP and AMP synthesis inhibitors

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Eating Inhibitors Nitrylase 3,5-dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-phosphosyl phosphate Glyphosate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and Herbicides such as P450 SU1 or Selection as Sulphonylureas Polyphenol Oxidase or Polyphenol Oxidase Bacterial Pathogens Affected Target or Principle (s) Culture Phenotype / Expression Tolerance to Antisense and Fungi such as Cylindrosporinia, Phoma, Sclerotinia Metallothionein Bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia Ribonuclease Bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia Antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP Bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phomatrium oxigenporum, Phoma, Sclerotinia ribonuclease Sclerotinia glucose oxidase bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia synthesis genes of pyrrolnitrin bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia serine / threonine kinases pa Bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia Cecropin B Bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) Bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia principle Targeted or culture principle Targeted culture / expressed (s) Cf gene tolerance eg Cf 9 Cf 5 bacterial pathogens Cf 4 Cf 2 and fungal agents such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia Osmotina bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia Alpha Bacterial pathogens and fungal pathogens Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia Sclerotinia Bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia Polygalacturonase inhibitors Bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia Prf regulating gene Bacterial pathogenic bacterial and fungal pathogens , Phoma, Sclerotinia phytoalexins bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia B-1,3-glucanase antisense bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia kinase receptor bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylmarosporium, Phoma Response-causing polypeptide hypersensitive and fungal bacterial pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Target affected or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Phoma, Sclerotinia Genes that acquire resistance to bacterial, bacterial, pathogenic (SAR) pathogens Nematodes Chitinases bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Cylindrosporium, Phoma, Sclerotinia Barnase virus coat proteins 17 kDa or 60 kDa virus virus nuclear inclusion proteins by virus example a or b or Nucleoprotein Pseudoubiquitin virus Replicase virus Bacillus thuringiensis VIP 3 toxins, lepidoptera, aphids Bacillus cereus toxins, Photorabdus toxins and Xenorhabdus 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, aphids Peroxidase lepidoptera, aphids Lepidoptera Aminopeptidase inhibitors, aphids, Leucine Aminopeptidase inhibitor, Lepidoptera aphids Protease inhibitors for example Lepidoptera, or aphid (phenotype) (s) Tolerance to cystatin, patatin, CPTI ribosome-inactivating protein lepidoptera, aphids stilbene synthase lepidoptera, aphids, diseases HMG-CoA reductase lepidoptera, aphids nematode cyst hatching stimulus nematodes cyst Barnase nematodes root nematodes nematodes and CBI nematode cyst Root-knot nematodes Nematode-induced antifeeding principles for example to a nematode-feeding site Root-knot nematodes and cyst Nematodes Table A11: Vegetable Brassica of Culture (kale, Brussels cabbage, broccoli etc.) Affected target or principle ( s) Culture phenotype / expressed Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulphonylureas, Imidazolinones, Thiazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxy benzoates, Phthalates AcetylCoA Carboxylase (ACCase) Aryloxyphenoxyalkocarboxylhexene hydroxylhexene oxidase-hydroxyphenylhexaphosphates Isoxaclortol, Trionas such as mesotrione or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase Phosphinothricin O-Methyl transferase altered levels of lignin Glutamine synthase Glufosinate, Bialaphos Adenylsuccinate Liase (ADSL) inhibitors Synthesis inhibitors of IMP and AMP

Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Adenylsuccinate tolerance Synthase Adenyl succinate synthesis inhibitors Anthanylate synthase Tryptophan synthesis and catabolism inhibitors Nitrylase 3,5-dihalo-4-hydroxy benzonitriles such as Bromoxynyl and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-phosphoshiquimate Glyphosate or sulfosate synthase (EPSPS) Glyphosate oxidoreductase Glyphosate or sulfosate Protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl ethers, cyclic imides, phenylpyrazol derivatives, phenopyrazole, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as Sulphonylureas Polyphenol oxidase or Polyphenol Antisense and fungal bacterial pathogens Metallothionein bacterial and fungal pathogens.

Ribonuclease bacterial and fungal pathogens Antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP bacterial and fungal pathogens oxalate oxidase bacterial and fungal pathogens glucose oxidase bacterial and fungal pathogens pyrrolnitrin synthesis genes bacterial and fungal pathogens serine and fungal pathogens bacterial and fungal pathogens principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Cecropin B bacterial and fungal pathogens Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) bacterial and fungal pathogens Cf genes eg Cf 9 Cf 5 Cf 4 Cf 2 bacterial and fungal pathogens Osmotine Bacterial and fungal pathogens Alpha Hordothionine Bacterial and fungal pathogens Sistemine Bacterial and fungal pathogens Polygalacturonase inhibitors Bacterial and fungal pathogens Prf regulator gene pathogens bacterial and fungal phytoalexins bacterial and fungal pathogens B-1,3-glucanase antisense bacterial and fungal pathogens receptor kinase receptor bacterial and fungal pathogens Polypeptide responsive bacterial pathogens hypersensitive and fungal Genes that acquire resistance bacterial pathogens, bacte - systemic (SAR) rian, fungal, nematode Chitinases bacterial and fungal pathogens Barnase bacterial and fungal pathogens Affected target or principle (s) Culture / expressed phenotype (s) Glucanase tolerance double strand bacterial and fungal pathogens virus coat proteins 17 kDa or 60 kDa virus virus nuclear inclusion proteins by virus a or b or Nucleoprotein Pseudoubiquitin virus Replicase virus Bacillus thuringiensis VIP 3 toxins, lepidoptera, aphids Bacillus cereus toxins, tox ines of Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, aphids Peroxidase lepidoptera, aphids Lepidoptera Aminopeptidase Inhibitors, example aphids, Leucine Aminopeptidase Inhibitor, Leptidopterin Aphidepath, Protathin Inhibitor, Protathin Inhibitor, CPA Inhibitor Leptin ribosome lepidoptera, aphids stilbene synthase lepidoptera, aphids, diseases HMG-CoA redeptase lepidoptera, aphids nematode cyst hatching stimulus nematode cyst Barnase nematodes for root node and nematode cyst nematodes root principle or nematodes (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to nematode-induced antifeeding principles eg nema-a nematode feeding site root node cyst and nematode cysts Table A12: Crop-free fruits eg apples, pears Affected target or principle (s) C phenotype Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulphonylureas, Imidazolinones, Triazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxy benzoates, Phthalates AcetylCoA Carboxylase (ACCase) Aryloxyphenoxyalkylcarboxyloxyhexaphosphoxothiazole dioxane mesotrione or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase Phosphinothricin O-Methyl transferase altered levels of lignin Glutamine synthetase Glufosinate, Bialafos Adenylsuccinate Liase (ADSL) IMP and AMP synthesis inhibitors

Adenylsuccinate synthase Adenyl succinate synthesis inhibitors Anthranilate synthase Tryptophan synthesis and catabolism inhibitors Nitriiasis 3,5-dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynyl and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-phosphosphosate or glyphosphosate EPSPS) Glyphosate oxidoreductase Glyphosate or sulfosate Protoporphyrinogen oxidasea (PROTOX) Diphenyl ethers, cyclic imides, phenylpyrazoles, pyridine derivatives, Target culture or principle (s) Phenopylate tolerance, oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as Sulphoniiureas Polyphenol oxidase or Polyphenol oxidase antisense and fungal bacterial pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Metallothionein bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Ribonuclease bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble oxalate oxidase bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble glucose oxidase bacterial pathogens and fungal like apple crust or fire bubble pyrrolnitrin synthesis genes bacterial and fungal pathogens like apple crust or fire bubble serine / threonine kinases bacterial and fungal pathogens like apple crust or fire bubble Cecropin B agents p bacterial and fungal atogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Phenylalanine ammonia lyase tolerance (PAL) bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Cf genes for example, Cf 9 Cf 5 Cf 4 Cf 2 bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Osmotine bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Alpha Hordotionine bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Sistemine bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Polygalacturonase inhibitors bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Prf regulator gene bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble phytoalexins bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or blister of fire B-1,3-glucanase antisense bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble receptor kinase bacterial and fungal pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / Expression (s) Tolerance to Polypeptide responsive to fungal and hypersensitive bacterial pathogens such as apple crust or fire bubble Genes that acquire resistance to bacterial, fungal, nematode viral pathogens (SARs) Lytic protein bacterial and fungal pathogens like apple crust or fire bubble Lysozyme bacterial and fungal pathogens like apple crust or fire bubble Chitinases bacterial and fungal pathogens like apple crust or fire bubble Barnase bacterial and fungal pathogens like apple crust or fire bubble Glucanases bacterial and fungal pathogens as crust apple or fire bubble double stranded ribonuclease virus coat proteins 17 kDa or 60 kDa protein virus virus nuclear inclusion proteins example a or b or Nucleoprotein Pseudoubiquitin virus Replicase virus Bacillus thuringiensis toxins VIP 3, lepidoptera, aphids , Bacillus cereus toxins, affected Target toxins or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Tolerance to Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, aphids, Mites Peroxidase lepidoptera, aphids, Aminopeptidase Inhibitor mites aphids, example mites, Leucine Aminopeptidase inhibitor Lectins lepidoptera, aphids, mites Protease inhibitors for example lepidoptera, aphids, cystatin mites, patatin, CPTI ribosome-inactivating protein mites, aphids, mepidoptera, diseases, -CoA reductase lepidoptera, aphids, mites Stimul nematode cyst hatching nematodes Barnase nematodes cyst nematodes for example root node nematodes and cyst nematodes CBI root node nematodes Nematode-induced antifeeding principles eg to a nematode nematode root and nematode feeding site Table A13: Crop Melons Affected target or principle (s) Crop phenotype / expressed Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulphonylureas, Imidazolinones, Triazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxy benzoates, AcetylCoA Phthalates Carboxylase (ACCase) Cyclohexoxylated aryloxyhexoxidase Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxigenase (HPPD) Isoxazoles such as Isoxaflutol or Isoxaclortol, Trionas such as mesotrione or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase Altered levels Phosphinothyrin Glutamine Synthasetrinase , Adenyl Bialafos ssuccinate Liase (ADSL) IMP and AMP Synthesis Inhibitors

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors 3,5-Dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-Phosphinthate Sulphosphosphate Glyphosate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as Sulphonylureas Polyphenol oxidase or Polyphenol oxidase antisense or fungal bacterial pathogens such as phytophtora Metallothionein bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora Bacterial fungal pathogens Phytophenic agents bacterial or fungal such as phytophtora Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Oxalate oxidase tolerance bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora glucose oxidase bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora bacterial or fungal pyrrolnitrin synthesis genes such as phytophtora serine / threonine kinases bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora Cecropin B bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora genes Cf for example Cf 9 Cf 5 Cf 4 Cf 2 bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora Osmotine bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora Alpha Hordotionine bacterial or fungal pathogenic agents such as phytophtora as phytophtora Polygalacturonase inhibitors bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora Prf regulator gene bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora phytoalexins bacterial or fungal pathogens as phytophtora B-1,3-glucanase antigenic bacterial pathogens bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Polypeptide tolerance eliciting response hypersensitive or fungal bacterial pathogens as phytophtora Genes that acquire resistance to bacterial, fungal, nematode viral pathogenic (SAR) pathogens bacterial or fungal pathogens such as phytophtora Lysozyme bacterial or fungal pathogens phytophtora Bacterial pathogenic bacterial pathogens or phytophtora bacterial pathogens or fungal such as phytophtora Glucanases bacterial or fungal pathogens such as double stranded phytophtora ribonuclease virus such as CMV, PRSV, WMV2, SMV, ZYMV virus coat proteins such as CMV, PRSV, WMV2, SMV, ZYMV 17 kDa or 60 kDa protein such as CMV, PRSV, WMV2, SMV, ZYMV virus nuclear inclusion proteins such as CMV, PRSV, WMV2, example a or b or Nucleoprotein SMV, ZYMV

Pseudoubiquitin virus as CMV, PRSV, WMV2, SMV, ZYMV

Virus like CMV, PRSV, WMV2, SMV, ZYMV is replicated

Bacillus thuringiensis VIP 3 toxins, lepidoptera, aphids, mites Bacillus cereus toxins, Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus toxins Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, mites, fly peroxidase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, whitefly Aminopeptidase inhibitors by lepidoptera, aphids, mites, example, leucine whitefly Aminopeptidase inhibitor Lectins lepidoptera, aphids, mites, whitefly Protease inhibitors eg lepidoptera, aphids, mites , patatin, CPTI, virgiferin whitefly ribosome inactivating protein lepidoptera, aphids, mites, whitefly stylbene synthase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, whitefly HMG-CoA redeptase lepidoptera, aphids, whitefly Nematode cyst hatching stimulus Barnase nematodes eg root node nematodes and cyst nematodes CBI nematodes root knot deodes Nematode-induced antifeeding principles eg nema to a nematode feeding site root knot cysts and nematode cyst Table A14: Culture Banana Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Acetolactate synthase (ALS) Sulfonylureas, imidazolinones, triazolopyrimidines, Pirimidiloxibenzoatos, Ftaletos acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) ariloxifenoxiaicanocarbo- xílicos acids, cyclohexanediones hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) Isoxazoles such as Isoxafiutol or Isoxaclortol, triones such as mesotrione or sulcotrione phosphinothricin acetyl transferase phosphinothricin O- Methyl transferase altered lignin levels Glutamine synthetase Glufosinate, Bialafos Adenylsuccinate Liase (ADSL) IMP and AMP synthesis inhibitors

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors 3,5-Diha-4-Hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and Loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-Phosphosphosate Glucosate Synthase (EPSPS) Glyphosate oxidoreductase Glyphosate or sulfosate Protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl ethers, cyclic imides, phenylpyrazoles, pyridine derivatives, phenopylate, oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as Sulphonylureas Polyphenol oxidase or Polyphenol oxidase antisense or fungal bacterial pathogens Metallothionein Bacterial or fungal pathogens Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Ribonuclease bacterial or fungal pathogens Antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP bacterial or fungal pathogens oxalate oxidase bacterial or fungal pathogens glucose oxidase bacterial or fungal pathogen synthesis genes pyrrolnitrin bacterial or fungal pathogenic agents serine or fungal pathogenic agents bacterial or fungal pathogens Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) bacterial or fungal pathogens Cf genes eg Cf 9 Cf 5 Cf 4 Cf 2 bacterial or fungal pathogens Osmotine p bacterial or fungal atogens Alpha Hordothionein bacterial or fungal pathogens Systemate bacterial or fungal pathogens Polygalacturonase inhibitors bacterial or fungal pathogens Prf regulating gene bacterial or fungal pathogens phytoalexins bacterial or fungal pathogens affected principle or culture phenotype / expressed (s) B-1,3-glucanase tolerance antisense bacterial or fungal pathogens receptors kinase receptor bacterial or fungal pathogens Polypeptide responsive hypersensitive or fungal bacterial pathogens Genes that acquire resistance to viral, bacterial pathogens (SAR) ryan, fungal, nematode Lytic protein bacterial or fungal pathogens Lysozyme bacterial or fungal pathogens Chitinases bacterial or fungal pathogens Barnase pathogenic agents ba bacterial or fungal pathogens Bacterial or fungal pathogens Double stranded ribonuclease virus as Banana head top virus (BBTV) Virus coat proteins such as Banana head top virus (BBTV) 17 kDa protein or 60 kDa virus such as Banana head top virus (BBTV) nuclear inclusion proteins by virus such as top one ca virus a or b or Banana cho Nucleoprotein (BBTV) Pseudoubiquitin virus like Banana head top (BBTV) Virus replicates as Banana head top virus (BBTV) Affected target or principle (s) Culture / expressed phenotype (s) Toxin tolerance of Bacillus thuringíensis VIP 3, lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes Bacillus cereus toxins, Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus toxins 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes Peroxidase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes and by lepidoptera, aphids, mites, eg, Aminopeptidase inhibitor leucine matodi Lectins lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes Protease inhibitors for example lepidoptera, aphids, ne cystatin, patatin, CPTI, viridiferin matodin protein lepidoptera ribosome, aphids, mites, stilbene synthase nematodes lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes HMG-CoA lepidoptera reductase, aphids, mites, nematodes Stem stimulation of the cyst nematodes cyst nematodes nematodes root node and cyst nematodes CBI root node nematodes Nematode-induced antifeeding principles eg nema-a nematode feeding site nematode root node cysts and target table Table A15: Affected target cotton or principle (s) Phenotype / culture / expressed Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulfonylureas, Imidazolinones, Thiazolopyrimidin as, Pyrimidyloxybenzoates, Phthalides AcetylCoA Carboxylase (ACCase) Aryloxyphenoxyalkanecarboxylic acids, Cyclohexanediones Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxigenase (HPPD) Isoxazoles such as Isoxaflutol or Isoxachltrase transferase Acetyltrinase Glufosinate, Bialafos Adenylsuccinate Liase (ADSL) IMP and AMP Synthesis Inhibitors

Adenylsuccinate synthase Adenyl succinate synthesis inhibitors Anthranate synthase Tryptophan synthesis and catabolism inhibitors Nitrylase 3,5-dihalo-4-hydroxybenzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-phosphoxyphosate Siphosphate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as sulfonylureas Polyphenol oxidase or Polyphenol oxidase antisense or fungal bacterial pathogens Affected target or principle (s) Culture / expressed tolerance Metallothionein tolerance bacterial or fungal pathogens Ribonuclease bacterial or fungal pathogens Antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP bacterial or fungal pathogens oxalate oxidase bacterial or fungal pathogens glucose oxidase bacterial or fungal pathogen synthesis genes pyrrolnitrin bacterial or fungal pathogenic agents serine or fungal pathogenic agents bacterial or fungal pathogens Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) bacterial or fungal pathogens Cf genes eg Cf 9 Cf 5 Cf 4 Cf 2 bacterial or fungal pathogens Osmotine p bacterial or fungal atogens Alpha Hordothionein bacterial or fungal pathogens Sistemine bacterial or fungal pathogens Polygalacturonase inhibitors bacterial or fungal pathogens Prf regulatory gene bacterial or fungal pathogens Target affected or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expression Tolerance to phytoalexins bacterial or fungal pathogens B-1,3-glucanase antisense bacterial or fungal pathogens receptor kinase receptor bacterial or fungal pathogens Polypeptide that causes response Hypersensitive or fungal bacterial pathogens Genes that acquire resistance to viral, bacterial pathogens (SAR) rian, fungal, nematode Iitic protein Bacterial or fungal pathogens Lysozyme bacterial or fungal pathogens Chitinases Bacterial or fungal pathogens Barnase pathogens ba bacterial or fungal pathogens Glucanases Double stranded bacterial or fungal pathogens Double stranded ribonuclease filament Double virus strand as wound tumor virus (WTV) Virus sheath proteins as Wound tumor virus (WTV) 17 kDa or 60 kDa virus protein such as wound tumor virus (WTV) virus nuclear inclusion proteins such as example tumor virus a or b or Nucleoprotein wound (WTV) Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Pseudoubiquitin tolerance Virus Like Wound Tumor Virus (WTV) Replicase Virus Like Wound Tumor Virus (WTV) Bacillus thuringiensis VIP 3 toxins, lepidoptera, aphids, mites, Bacillus cereus toxins, nematode toxins, whitefly Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly Peroxidase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly Aminopepti inhibitors dase by lepidoptera, aphids, mites, eg, Aminopeptidase inhibitor matodes, leucine whitefly Lectins lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly Protease inhibitors eg lepidoptera, aphids, mites, ne cystatin, patatin , CPTI, virgiferin matode, whitefly ribosome-inactivating protein lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly stilbene synthase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematode, whitefly HMG-CoA redepase lepidoptera, aphids, nematodes matodes, whitefly Nematode cyst hatching stimulus Nematode cyst Barnase nematodes For example root node nematodes and cyst nematodes CBI Root node nematodes Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Principles nematode-induced antifeeding agents for example nema- a nematode feeding site root node cysts and nematodes Table A16: Sugar cane d Target and Culture affected or ingredient (s) Phenotype culture / expressed (s) Tolerance to Acetolactate synthase (ALS) Sulfonylureas, Imidazolinones, T riazolopirimidinas, pyrimidyloxy-benzoates, Ftaletos acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) ariloxifenoxialcanocarbo- xílicos acids, cyclohexanediones Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase ( HPPD) Isoxazoles such as Isoxaflutol or Isoxaclortol, Trionas such as mesotrione or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase Phosphinothricin O-Methyl transferase altered levels of lignin Glutamine synthase Glufosinate, Bialaphos Adenylsuccinate IMP-libase synthesis and Adenyl succinates

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors 3,5-Dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-Phosphinthate Sulphosphosphate Glyphosate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as sulfonylureas Polyphenol oxidase or Polyphenol oxidase antisense or fungal bacterial pathogens Metallothionein bacterial or fungal pathogens Ribonuclease bacterial or fungal pathogens Antifungal polypeptide AlyAFP bacterial or fungal pathogens oxalate oxidase bacterial or fungal pathogens glucose oxidase bacterial or fungal pathogen synthesis genes pyrrolnitrin bacterial or fungal pathogenic agents serine or fungal pathogenic agents bacterial or fungal pathogens Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) bacterial or fungal pathogens Cf genes eg Cf 9 Cf 5 Cf 4 Cf 2 bacterial or fungal pathogens Osmotine agents bacterial or fungal pathogens Alpha Hordotionine bacterial or fungal pathogens Sistemine bacterial or fungal pathogens Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to Polygalacturonase inhibitors Bacterial or fungal pathogens Pregene regulating gene or pathogens fungal phytoalexins bacterial or fungal pathogens B-1,3-glucanase antisense bacterial or fungal pathogen receptors kinase receptor bacterial or fungal pathogens Polypeptide responsive to bacterial hypersensitive or fungal pathogens Genes that acquire resistance to viral, bacterial pathogens (SAR) ryan, fungal, nematode Lytic protein bacterial or fungal pathogens Lysozyme bacterial or fungal pathogens eg clavi-bacter Chitinases bacterial or fungal pathogens Barn ase bacterial or fungal pathogens Glucanases bacterial or fungal pathogens Double stranded virus ribonuclease such as SCMV, SrMV

virus coat proteins such as SCMV, SrMV

17 kDa or 60 kDa virus proteins such as SCMV, SrMV

virus nuclear inclusion proteins such as SCMV, SrMV example a or b or Nucleoprotein Affected target or principle (s) Culture / expressed phenotype (s) Tolerance to Pseudoubiquitin viruses such as SCMV, SrMV

Virus replicates such as SCMV, SrMV

Baciilus thuringiensis VIP 3 toxins, lepidoptera, aphids, mites, Baciilus cereus toxins, nematode toxins, whitefly, be Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus souros, for example, “mexican rice borer” 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, aphids, - matodes, whitefly, beetles, for example, mexican rice borer Peroxidase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly, beetles, for example, mexican rice borer Aminopeptidase inhibitors by lepidoptera, aphids, mites, for example, Aminopeptidase inhibitor, matididae, whitefly, besuc de Leucina ros, for example, mexican rice borer Lectinas lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematode, whitefly, beetles, for example, mexican rice borer5 ' Protease inhibitors for example lepidoptera, aphids, mites, cystatin, patatin, CPTI, virgiferin matodes, whitefly, beetles, eg mexican rice borer lepi ribosome inactivating protein doptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly, beetles, eg “mexican rice borer” Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance to stilbene synthase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes matodes, whitefly, beetles, eg mexican rice borer HMG-CoA reductase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly, beetles eg mexican rice borer Nematode cyst hatching stimulus Barnase nematodes eg root node nematodes and cyst nematodes CBI root node nematodes Nematode induced antifeeding principles eg nema to a nematode root site and cyst nematode feeding site Table A17L_GirassoI Affected Culture Principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulfonylureas, Imidazolinones, Thiazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxy benzoates, Aceti phthalides 1CoA Carboxylase (ACCase) Aryloxyphenoxyalkanecarboxylic acids, Cyclohexanediones Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxigenase (HPPD) Isoxazoles such as Isoxaflutol or Isoxaclortol, Trionas such as mesotrione or sulcotrothinase. (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Adenylosuccinate lyase tolerance (ADSL) IMP and AMP synthesis inhibitors

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors 3,5-DihaIo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-Phosphosphosate Glucosate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as sulphonylureas Polyphenol oxidase or polyphenol oxidase antisense or fungal bacterial pathogens Metallothionein bacterial or fungal pathogens Ribonuclease bacterial or fungal pathogens Oxygene pathogens Fungal agents or antifungal agents bacterial or fungal pathogens, for example, sclerotin glucose oxidase bacterial or fungal pathogens pyrrolnitrin synthesis genes bacterial or fungal pathogens Affected target or principle Culture / expressed phenotype (s) Serine / threonine kinase tolerance agents bacterial or fungal pathogens Cecropin B bacterial or fungal pathogens Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) bacterial or fungal pathogens Cf genes eg Cf 9 Cf 5 Cf 4 Cf 2 bacterial pathogens or fungal Osmotine bacterial or fungal pathogens Alpha Hordotionine bacterial or fungal pathogens Systemaine bacterial or fungal pathogens Polygalacturonase inhibitors Prf-regulating gene Bacterial or fungal pathogens Bacterial or fungal fungal pathogens Bacterial or fungal pathogens Bacterial or fungal pathogens antisense bacterial or fungal pathogens receptor kinase receptor bacterial or fungal pathogens Polypeptide responsive to hypersensitive or fungal bacterial pathogens Genes that acquire resistance to bacterial, bacterial, pathogenic (SAR) pathogens; ryan, fungal, nematode; Target affected or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Lisozyme tolerance bacterial or fungal pathogens Chitinases bacterial or fungal pathogens Ba rnase bacterial or fungal pathogens Glucanases bacterial or fungal pathogens Double stranded virus ribonuclease such as CMV, TMV

virus coat proteins such as CMV, TMV

17 kDa or 60 kDa virus proteins such as CMV, TMV

virus nuclear inclusion proteins such as CMV, example TMV a or b or Pseudoubiquitin Nucleoprotein virus such as wound tumor virus (WTV) replicase virus such as wound tumor virus (WTV) Bacillus thuringiensis VIP 3 toxins, lepidoptera, aphids, mites, Bacillus cereus toxins, nematode toxins, whitefly, be-Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus souros 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematode, whitefly, peroxidase lepidoptera, aphids, - macaids, whitefly, beetles Aminopeptidase inhibitors by lepidoptera, aphids, mites, eg, Aminopeptidase inhibitor mammoths, whitefly, leucine rosou Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Tolerance a Lectins lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly Protease inhibitors for example lepidoptera, aphids, mites, ne-cystatin, patatin, CPTI, virgiferin matodes, mo white sca, beetles ribosome inactivating protein lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly, stilbid synthase lepidoptera beetles, aphids, mites, nematode, whitefly, beetles HMG-CoA reductase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly, beetles Nematode cyst hatching stimulus Nematode cyst Barnase nematodes eg Root node nematodes and CBI nematodes Root node nematodes Nematode induced antifeeding principles eg nematode to a nematode feeding site root node and cyst nematodes Table A18: Cultivating Sugar Beet, Beet Root Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance Sulphonylureas, Imidazolinones, Triazolopyrimidines, Pyrimidyloxy-benzo , Phthalides Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed AcetylCoA Carboxylase (ACCase) tolerance Aryloxyphenoxyalkanecarboxylic acids, Cyclohexanediones Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxigenase (HPPD) Isoxazoles such as Isoxaflutoi or Isoxaclortol, Trionas such as mesotrione or sulcotrione Phosphinothricin acetyl transferase Glucosulfin Adenosine phosphate IMP and AMP

Adenylsuccinate Synthase Adenylsuccinate Synthesis Inhibitors Anthranilate Synthase Tryptophan Synthesis and Catabolism Inhibitors 3,5-Dihalo-4-hydroxy-benzonitriles such as Bromoxynil and loxynyl 5-Enopyruvyl-3-Phosphinthate Sulphosphosphate Glyphosate EPSPS) Glyphosate Oxidoreductase Glyphosate or Sulphosate Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (PROTOX) Diphenyl Ethers, Cyclic Imides, Phenylpyrazoles, Pyridine Derivatives, Phenopylate, Oxadiazoles, etc.

Cytochrome P450 for example Xenobiotics and herbicides such as P450 SU1 or selection as sulfonylureas Polyphenol oxidase or Polyphenol oxidase antisense or fungal bacterial pathogens Metallothionein bacterial or fungal pathogens Ribonuclease bacterial or fungal pathogens Target or culture (target) / principle expressed Tolerance to Antifungal Polypeptide AlyAFP bacterial or fungal pathogens oxalate oxidase bacterial or fungal pathogens, for example, sclerotin glucose oxidase bacterial or fungal pathogen synthesis genes serrine or bacterial pathogenic bacteria bacterial or fungal pathogens Cecropin B bacterial or fungal pathogens Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) bacterial or fungal pathogens Cf genes eg Cf 9 Cf 5 Cf 4 Cf 2 bacterial pathogens or fungal Osmotine bacterial or fungal pathogens Alpha Hordothionein bacterial or fungal pathogens Systemaine bacterial or fungal pathogens Polygalacturonase inhibitors Prf-regulating gene Bacterial or fungal pathogens fungal or fungal pathogens (phytoalexins principle or agents) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) B-1,3-glucanase tolerance antisense Bacterial or fungal pathogens Ax + WIN proteins Bacterial or fungal pathogens such as Cercospora be-ticola kinase receptor Bacterial or fungal pathogens Response-causing polypeptide hypersensitive or fungal bacterial pathogens Genes that acquire resistance bacterial, fungal, nematode viral pathogenic (SAR) pathogens Lytic protein bacterial or fungal pathogens Lysozyme pathogens nicos bacterial or fungal pathogens Chitinases bacterial or fungal pathogens Barnase bacterial or fungal Glucanases bacterial or fungal pathogens Ribonuclease double-strand viruses as BNYVV

virus coat proteins like BNYVV

17 kDa or 60 kDa virus protein as BNYVV

nuclear inclusion proteins by virus such as BNYVV example a or b or Nucleoprotein Pseudoubiquitin virus such as BNYVV

Virus replicates as BNYVV

Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed Toxin tolerance of Bacillus thuringiensis VIP 3, lepidoptera, aphids, mites, Bacillus cereus toxins, nematode toxins, whitefly, be-Photorabdus and Xenorhabdus souro, flies (rootflies) 3-Hydroxysteroid oxidase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly, beetles, flies peroxidase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly, beetles, flies Aminopeptidase inhibitors by lepidoptera, aphids, mites, eg, Aminopeptidase inhibitor matodes, whitefly, Leucina ros beetle, flies (rootflies) lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly, beetles, rootflies protease for example lepidoptera, aphids, mites, cystatin, patatin, CPTI, virgiferin, maroids, whitefly, beetles, ribosome inactivating protein lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes Hides, whitefly, beetles, rootflies stilbene synthase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly, beetles, beetles, rootflies HMG-CoA redeptase lepidoptera, aphids, mites, nematodes, whitefly , beetles, flies (rootflies) Nematode cyst hatching stimulus Nematode cyst Affected target or principle (s) Culture phenotype / expressed (s) Barnase tolerance nematodes eg Root node nematodes and nematode cysts Resistance locus cyst nematode cyst Beet nematode CBI root knot nematodes Nematode-induced antifeeding principles eg nema to a nematode root and cyst nematode feeding site The above animate squares that can be controlled by the process according to invention (A) include, for example, insects representative of the order acarina and representative of the nematode class; especially of the order Lepidoptera Acleris spp., Adoxophyes spp., especially Adoxophyes reticulana; Aegeria spp., Agrotis spp., Especially Agrotis spinifera; Alabama argillaceae, Amylois spp., Anticarsia gemmatalis, Archips spp., Argyrotaenia spp., Autographa spp., Busseola fusca, Cadra cautella, Carposina nipponensis, Chilo spp. Cochylis spp., Coleophora spp., Crocidolomia binotalis, Cryptophlebia leucotreta, Cydia spp., Especially Cydia pomonella; Diatraea spp., Diparopsis cas-tanea, Earias spp., Ephestia spp., Especially E. Khüniella; Eucosma spp., Eupoecilia ambiguelia, Euproctis spp., Euxoa spp., Grapholita spp., Hedya nubiferana, Heliothis spp., Especially H. virescens and H. zea; He-llula undalis, Hyphantria cunea, Keiferia lycopersicella, Leucoptera scitella, Lithocollethis spp., Lobesiaspp., Lymantria spp., Lyonetia spp., Malacosoma spp., Mamestra brassicae, Manduca Friday, Operophtera spp., Ostrinia numilp spp. ., Pandemis spp., Panolis flammea, Pectinophora spp., Phthorimaea operculella, Pieris rapae, Pieris spp., Plutella xylostella, Prays spp., Sesamia spp., Sparganothis spp., Spodopteralitto-ralp sp. Thaumetopoea spp., Tortrix spp., Trichoplusia ni and Yponomeuta spp .; Coleoptera, for example Agriotes spp., Anthonomus spp., Atomaria ria linearis, Chaetocnema tibialis, Cosmopolites spp., Curculio spp., Der-mestes spp., Diabrotica spp., Eremnus spp., Leptinotarsa decemi , Lissorhoptrus spp., Melolontha spp., Oryzaephilus spp., Oti-orhynchus spp., Phlyctinus spp., Popyllia spp., Rhizopertha spp., Scarabeidae, Sitophilus spp., Sitotroga spp., Tenebrio spp. spp. and Trogoderma spp .; Orthoptera, for example Blatta spp., Blattella spp., Gryllotalpa spp., Leucophaea maderae, Locusta spp., Periplaneta spp. and Schistocerca spp .; of the order Isoptera, for example Reticulitermes spp .; from the order Psocoptera, for example, Liposcelis spp .; from the order Anoplura, for example Haematopinus spp., Linognathus spp., Pe-diculus spp., Pemphigus spp. and Phylloxera spp .; of the order Mallophaga, for example Damalinea spp. and Trichodeces spp .; from the order Thysanoptera, for example Frankliniella spp., Hercinothrips spp., Taeniothrips spp., Thrips palmi, Thrips tabaci and Scirtothrips aurantii; of the order Heteroptera, for example Cimex spp., Distantiella theobroma, Dysdercus spp., Euchistus spp. Eurygaster spp. Leptocorisa spp., Nezara spp., Piesma spp., Rhodnius spp., Sahlbergella singularis, Scotinophara spp. and Triatoma spp .; Homoptera, for example, Aleurothrixus floccosus, Aleyrodes brasicaica, Aonidiella aurantii, Aphididae, Aphiscraccivora, A. fabae, A. gosypii; Aspidiotus spp., Bemisia tabaci, Ceroplaster spp., Chrysomphalus aonidium, Chrysomphalus dictyospermi, Coccus hesperidum, Empoasca spp., Erioso-ma ianigerum, Erythroneura spp. Macrosiphus spp., Myzus spp., Especially M.persicae; Nephotettix spp., Especially N. cincticeps; Nilaparvata spp., Especially N. lugens; Paratoria spp., Pemphigus spp., Planococcus spp., Pseudaulacaspis spp., Pseudococcus spp., Especially P. Fragilis, P. citricu-lus and P. comstocki; Psylla spp., Especially P. pyri; Pulvinaria aethiopica, Quadraspidiotus spp., Rhopalosiphum spp., Saissetia spp., Scaphoideus spp., Schizaphis spp., Sitobion spp., Trialeurodes vaporariorum, Trioza erytreae and Unaspis citri; from the order Hymenoptera, for example Acromyrmex, Atta spp., Cephus spp., Diprion spp., Diprionidae, Gilpinia polytoma, Hoplocampa spp., Lasius spp., Monomorium pharaonis, Neodiprion spp., Solenopsis spp. and Vespa spp .; from the order Diptera, for example Aedes spp., Antherigona soccata, Bibio hor-tulanus, Calliphora erythrocephala, Ceratitis spp., Chrysomyia spp., Culex spp., Dereus spp., Drosophila melanogaster, Fannia spp., Gastrophilus spp. ., Glossina spp., Hypoderma spp., Hyppobosca spp., Liri-omyza spp., Lucilia spp., Melanagromyza spp., Musca spp., Orestrolia spp., Oscinella frit, Pegomyia hyoscyami, Phorbia spp. Rhagoletis pomonella, Sciara spp., Stomoxys spp., Tabanus spp., Tannia spp. and Tipula spp; of the order Siphonaptera, for example Ceratophyllus spp. and Xenopsylla che-opis; from the order of Thysanura, for example Lepisma saccharina and from the order Acarina, for example Acarus siro, Aceria sheldoni; Aculus spp., Especially A. schlechtendali; Amblyomma spp., Argas spp., Boophilus spp., Bre-vipalpus spp., Especially B. californicus and B. phoenicis; Bryobia praetio-sa, Calipitrimerus spp., Chorioptes spp., Dermanyssus gallinae, Eote-tranychus spp., Especially E.carpini and E. orientalis; Eriophyes spp., Especially E. vitis; Hyalomma spp., Ixodes spp., Olygonychus pratensis, Ornithodoros spp., Panonychus spp., Especially P. ulmi and P. citri; Phyllocoptruta spp., Especially P. oleivora; Polyphagotarsonemus spp., Especially P. latus; Psoroptes spp., Rhipicephalus spp., Rhizoglyphus spp., Sarcoptes spp., Tarsonemus spp. and Tetranychus spp., in particular T. urticae, T. cinnabarinus and T. Kanzawai; representatives of the Nematoda class; (1) nematodes selected from the group consisting of root node nematodes, cyst-forming nematodes, stem angles and leaf nematodes; (2) nematodes selected from the group consisting of Anguina spp .;

Aphelenchoides spp .; Ditylenchus spp .; Globodera spp., For example Glo-bodera rostochiensis; Heterodera spp., For example Heterodera avenae, Heterodera glycines, Heterodera schachtii or Heterodera trifolii; Longidorus spp .; Meloidogyne spp., For example Meloidogyne incognita or Meloidogyne javanica; Pratylenchus, for example Pratylenchus neglectans or Pratylen-chus penetrans; Radopholus spp., For example Radopholus similis; Tricho-dorus spp .; Tylenchulus, for example Tylenchulus semi penetrans; and Xiphi-nema spp .; or (3) nematodes selected from the group consisting of Heterodera spp., for example Heterodera glycines; and Meloidogyne spp., for example Meloidogyne incognita. The method according to the invention (A) allows pests of the above type to be controlled, that is to say contained or destroyed, which occurs in particular in transgenic plants, especially useful and ornamental plants in agriculture, in horticulture and in forests or parts such as fruits, flowers, foliage, stems, tubers or roots of such plants, protection against these pests in some cases extending even to plant parts that form on a later occasion . The process according to the invention (A) may be advantageously employed to control pests in rice, crops such as corn or sorghum; in fruits, for example stone fruit, stone fruit and soft fruit such as apples, pears, plums, peaches, almonds, cherries or berries, for example blackberries, raspberries or blackberries; in vegetables such as beans, lentils, peas or soybeans; in oil crops such as rapeseed, mustard, poppy, olive, sunflower, coconut, castor oil, cocoa or peanut oil plants; in the pumpkin family such as squash, cucumber or melons; in fiber plants such as cotton, flax, hemp or jute; in citrus fruits such as orange, lemon, grapefruit or tangerine; in vegetables such as spinach, lettuce, asparagus, cabbage, carrot, onion, tomato, potato, beet or capsicum species; in the laurel family such as avocado, cinnamonium or camphor; or in tobacco, nuts, coffee, eggplant, sugar cane, tea, peppers, vines, hops, the banana family, latex or ornamental plants, mainly corn, rice, cereals, soy, tomato, cotton, potato , sugar beet, rice and mustard; particularly on cotton, rice, soybeans, potatoes and corn.

It has been found that the process according to the invention (A) is valuable preventively or curatively in the field of pest control even at low concentration of use of the pesticidal composition and that a very favorable biocidal spectrum is achieved. Combined with a favorable comorbidity of the composition employed with warm-blooded species, fish and plants, the method according to the invention may be employed against all or individual developmental stages of normally sensitive but also normally resistant animal pests such as insects and representatives of the order Acarina, depending on the species of the transgenic crop plant to be protected from pest attack. The insecticidal or acaricidal effect of the method according to the invention may be made apparent directly, that is, in a pest destruction that occurs immediately or only after some time has elapsed, for example during ecdysis or indirectly, for example, for example. as a reduced oviposition and / or hatching rate, the good deed corresponding to a rate of destruction (mortality) of at least 40 to 50%.

Depending on the intended purpose and the prevailing circumstances, pesticides within the scope of the invention (A), which are themselves known, are emulsifiable concentrates, suspension concentrates, solutions that can be sprayed or diluted directly, wettable pastes, diluted emulsions. wettable powders, soluble powders, dispersible powders, wettable powders, fine powders; granules or encapsulations in polymeric substances comprising a macrolide compound.

The active ingredients are employed in these compositions together with at least one of the auxiliaries conventionally used in the formulation art, such as diluents, for example solvents or solid carriers or such as surfactants (surfactants).

Formulation aids that are used are, for example, solid carriers, solvents, stabilizers, "slow release" aids, colorants and, if appropriate, surfactants (surfactants). Suitable vehicles and auxiliaries are all those substances that are conventionally used for crop protection products. Suitable auxiliaries such as solvents, solid carriers, surfactant compounds, nonionic surfactants, cationic surfactants, anionic surfactants and other auxiliaries in the compositions employed according to the invention are, for example, those described in EP-A-736,252.

These pest control compositions may be formulated, for example, as wettable powders, fine powders, granules, solutions, emulsifiable concentrates, emulsions, suspension concentrates or aerosols. For example, the compositions are of the type described in EP-A-736,252. The action of compositions within the scope of the invention (A) which comprise a macrolide compound may be substantially enhanced and adapted to the prevailing circumstances by the addition of other insecticidly, carcinogens and / or fungicidally active ingredients. Suitable examples of added active ingredients are representative of the following classes of active ingredients: organophosphorous compounds, nitrophenols and derivatives, formamidines, urea, carbamates, pyrethroids, chlorinated hydrocarbons; Especially preferred components in mixtures are, for example, thiametoxam, pimetrozine, phenoxycarb, imidacloprid, Ti-435, fipronil, pyridoxyfen, enamectin, diazinon or diafentiuron.

As a rule, compositions within the scope of the invention (A) comprise 0.1 to 99%, in particular 0.1 to 95%, of a macrolide compound and 1 to 99.9%, in particular 5 to 99.9. % of - at least - a solid or liquid auxiliary, being possible, as a rule, for 0 to 25%, in particular 0 to 20%, of the compositions to be surfactant (% in each case meaning percent by weight) . Although concentrated compositions are more preferred as commercial products, the end user will use, as a rule, dilute compositions that have considerably lower concentrations of active ingredient.

The compositions according to the invention (A) may also comprise other solid or liquid auxiliaries, such as stabilizers, for example epoxidized or non-epoxidized vegetable oils (e.g., coconut oil, rapeseed oil or epoxidized soya), defoamers, for example, silicone oil, preservatives, viscosity regulators, binders and / or tackifiers and also fertilizers or other active ingredients to achieve specific effects, for example bactericides, fungicides, nematicides, mollusks or herbicides.

The compositions according to the invention (A) are produced in a known manner, for example prior to mixing with the auxiliary / auxiliaries by milling, screening and / or compressing the active ingredient, for example to provide a special particle size. and by intimate mixing and / or milling of the active ingredient with the auxiliary / auxiliaries. The method according to the invention for pest control of the above mentioned type is carried out in a manner known to those skilled in the art, depending on the intended purpose and the prevailing circumstances, i.e. spraying, wetting, atomizing, spraying, brush application, seed treatment, diffusion or spillage of the composition. Typical concentrations of use are between 0.1 and 1000 ppm, preferably between 0.1 and 500 ppm active ingredient. The rate of application may vary within wide ranges and depends on the soil constitution, the type of application (application to leaves; seed treatment; application to seed furrow), the transgenic crop plant, the pest to be controlled, prevailing climatic conditions in each case and other factors determined by the type of application, the timing of the application and the Ivo culture. Application rates per hectare are usually 1 to 2000 g macrolide compound per hectare, in particular 10 to 1000 g / ha, preferably 10 to 500 g / ha, especially preferably 10 to 200 g / ha.

A preferred type of application in the field of crop protection within the scope of the invention (A) is application to plant foliage (application to leaves), whereby frequency and application rate can be adapted to the risk of infestation with the pest in question. However, the active ingredient can also enter plants through the root system (systemic action), by soaking the plant site with a liquid composition or by incorporating the active ingredient in solid form at the plant site, for example in the soil, for example in the soil. granule form (ground application). In the case of rice crops such granules may be measured and introduced into the paddy field.

The compositions according to the invention (A) are also suitable for protecting transgenic plant propagating material, for example seed, such as fruits, tubers or plant grains or cuts, from animal pests, in particular from insects and representatives of the order Acarina. Propagation material may be treated with the composition prior to application, for example, the seed being treated prior to sowing. The active ingredient may also be applied to the seed grains (coating), by soaking the grains in a liquid composition or by coating them with a solid composition. The composition may also be applied to the application site when the propagation material is applied, for example to the seed furrow during sowing. These treatment methods for the propagating material and the treated plant propagating material are thus another subject of the invention.

Examples of formulations of macrolide compounds which may be used in the method according to the invention (A), for example solutions, granules, fine powders, sprayable powders, emulsion concentrates, coated granules and suspension concentrates are of the type as described above. for example, in EP-A-580,553, Examples F1 to F10.

Table B The following abbreviations are used in the table: Active principle of transgenic plant: AP Photorhabdus luminescens: PL Xenorhabdus nematophilus: XN Proteinase inhibitors: Plnh.

Plant Lectins Plec Agglutinins: Aggl 3-Hydroxysteroid Oxidase: HO Cholesteroloxidase: CO Chitinase: CH Glucanase: GL η Stilbensintase: SS ο. B. * '' Table B: ^ ^ ^ Biological Examples Table 1: A pest control process comprising the application of Abamectin to transgenic cotton, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to to a row from table B.

Table 2: A pest control process comprising the application of Abamectin to transgenic rice, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 3: A pest control process comprising applying Abamectin to transgenic potatoes, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 4: A pest control process comprising the application of Abamectin to transgenic brassica, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 5: A pest control process comprising applying Abamectin to transgenic tomatoes, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 6: A pest control process comprising the application of Abamectin to transgenic curcubitaceae, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 7: A pest control process comprising the application of Abamectin to transgenic soybeans, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 8: A pest control process comprising the application of Abamectin to transgenic maize, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 9: A pest control process comprising the application of Abamectin to transgenic wheat, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 10: A pest control process comprising the application of Abamectin a (transgenic bananas, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to one row in table B.

Table 11: A pest control process comprising applying Abamectin to transgenic citrus trees, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 12: A pest control process comprising the application of Abamectin to trees of. transgenic pitted fruit, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 13: A pest control process comprising the application of Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic cotton, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 14: A pest control process comprising applying Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic rice, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 15: A pest control process comprising applying Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic potatoes, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 16: A pest control process comprising applying Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic tomatoes, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 17: A pest control process comprising the application of Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic curcubitaceae, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 18: A pest control process comprising the application of Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic soybeans, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 19: A pest control process comprising the application of Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic maize, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 20: A pest control process comprising the application of Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic wheat, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 21: A pest control process comprising applying Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic bananas, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 22: A pest control process comprising applying Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic orange trees, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 23: A pest control process comprising the application of Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic pitted fruit, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 24: A pest control process comprising the application of Emamectin-Benzoate to transgenic curcubitaceae, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 25: A pest control process comprising the application of Spinosad to transgenic cotton, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 26: A pest control process comprising the application of Spinosad to transgenic rice, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 27: A pest control process comprising applying Spinosad to transgenic potatoes, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 28: A pest control process comprising the application of Spinosad to transgenic brassica, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 29: A pest control process comprising applying Spinosad to transgenic tomatoes, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 30: A pest control process comprising applying Spinosad to transgenic curcubitaceae, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 31: A pest control process comprising the application of Spinosad to transgenic soybeans, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 32: A pest control process comprising the application of Spinosad to transgenic maize, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 33: A pest control process comprising the application of Spinosad to transgenic wheat, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 34: A pest control process comprising applying Spinosad to transgenic bananas, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 35: A pest control process comprising applying Spinosad to transgenic citrus trees, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table 36: A pest control process comprising applying Spinosad to transgenic pitted fruit trees, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the pest to be controlled corresponds to a row in Table B.

Table C: Abbreviations: Acetyl-COA Carboxylase: ACCase Acetolactate Synthase: ALS

Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxigenase: HPPD Inhibition of protein synthesis: IPS Hormone imitation: HO Glutamine Synthetase: GS Protoporphyrinogen oxidase: PROTOX 5-Enolpiruvyl-3-Phosphoshikimate Synthase: EPSPS

Culture-Tolerant Principle CÃ ÃLS Sulphonylureas, etc. *** Cotton C.2 ALS Sulfonylureas etc. *** Rice C.3 ALS Sulfonylureas etc. *** Brassica C.4 ALS Sulfonylureas etc. *** Potatoes C.5 ALS Sulfonylureas etc. *** Tomatoes C.6 ALS Sulfonylureas etc. *** Curcubitaceae C.7 ALS Sulfonylureas etc. *** Soy C.8 ALS Sulfonylureas etc. *** Corn C.9 ALS Sulfonylureas etc. *** Wheat C.10 ALS Sulphonylureas etc. *** Pitted fruit C.11 ALS Sulfonylureas etc. *** Stone fruit C.12 ALS Sulfonylureas etc. *** citrus C.13 ACCase +++ Cotton C.14 ACCase +++ Rice C.15 ACCase +++ Brassica C.16 ACCase +++ Potatoes C.17 ACCase +++ Tomatoes C.18 ACCase ++ + Curcubitaceous C.19 ACCase +++ Soy C.20 ACCase + 4. + Corn C.21 ACCase +++ Wheat C.22 ACCase +++ Pitted Fruit C.23 ACCase +++ Pitted Fruit C.24 ACCase +++ citrus Culture Tolerant Principle C.25 HPPD Isoxaflutol, Isoxaclotol, Sulcotrion, Mesotrion Cotton C.26 HPPD Isoxaflutol, Isoxaclotol, Sulotrion, Mesotrion Rice C.27 HPPD Isoxaflutol, Isoxaclotol, Isoxaclotol, Isoxaflutol , Isoxaclotol, Sulcotrion, Mesotrion Potatoes C.29 HPPD Isoxaflutol, Isoxaclotol, Sulcotrion, Mesotrion Tomatoes C.30 HPPD Isoxaflutol, Isoxaclotol, Sulcotrion, Mesotrion Curcubitaceous C.31 HPPlol Ixxlol , Sulcotrion, Mesotrion Corn C.33 HPPD Isoxaflutol, Isoxaclotol, Sulcotrion, Mesotrion Wheat C.34 HPPD Isoxaflutol, Isoxaclotol, Sulcotrion, Mesotrio n Pitted fruit C.35 HPPD Isoxaflutol, Isoxaclotol, Sulcotrion, Mesotrion Pitted fruit C.36 HPPD Isoxaflutol, Isoxaclotol, Sulcotrion, Mesotrion citrus C.37 Nitrilase Bromoxynil, Loxynil Cotton Brom C.38 Nitrilase C.38 Nitrilase C.38 Nitrilase C.38 Bromoxynil, loxynil Brassica C.40 Nitrilase Bromoxynil, loxynil Potatoes C.41 Nitrilase Bromoxynil, loxynil Tomatoes C.42 Nitrilase Bromoxynil, loxynil Curcubitacs Culture Tolerant Principle C.43 Nitrilase Bromoxynil C. loxynil C.44 Nitrilase Bromoxynil Soil 45 Bromoxynil Nitrilase, loxynil Wheat C.46 Bromoxynil Nitrilase, loxynil pitted fruit C.47 Bromoxynil Nitrilase, loxynil pitted fruit C.48 Bromoxynil nitrile, loxynil citrus C.49 IPS Chloroactanilides &&& Cotton C.50il & C&A Chloractanides 51 IPS Chloroactanilides &&& Brassica C.52 IPS Chloroactanilides &&& Potatoes C.53 IPS Chloroactanilides &&& Tomatoes C.54 IPS Chloroactanilides &&& Curcubitaceae C.55 IPS Chloroactanilides && Soya C. 56 IPS Chloroactanilides &&& Corn C.57 IPS Chloroactanilides &&& Wheat C.58 IPS Chloroactanilides &&& Pitted Fruit C.59 IPS Chloroactanilides &&& Stone Fruit C.60 IPS Chloroactanilides &&& Citrus C.61 HOM 2,4-D, Mecoprop-P Cotton C.62 HOM 2,4-D, Mecoprop-P Rice C.63 HOM 2,4-D, Mecoprop-P Brassica C.64 HOM 2,4-D, Mecoprop-P Potatoes C.65 HOM 2,4 -D, Mecoprop-P Tomatoes C.66 HOM 2,4-D, Mecoprop-P Curcubitaceous C.67 HOM 2,4-D, Mecoprop-P Soybean C.68 HOM 2,4-D, Mecoprop-P Corn C .69 HOM 2,4-D, Mecoprop-P Wheat C.70 HOM 2,4-D, Mecoprop-P Pitted Fruit C.71 HOM 2,4-D, Mecoprop-P Pitted Fruit C.72 HOM 2 , 4-D, Mecoprop-P citrus Culture Tolerant Principle C.73 PROTOX PROTOX Inhibitors C.74 PROTOX PROTOX Inhibitors /// Rice C.75 PROTOX PROTOX Inhibitors /// Brassica C.76 PROTOX PROTOX Inhibitors /// Potatoes C.77 PROTOX PROTOX Inhibitors /// Tomatoes C.78 PROTOX PROTOX Inhibitors /// Curcubitaceous C.79 PROTOX PROTOX Inhibitors /// Soy C.80 PROTOX Ini PROTOX inhibitors /// Corn C.81 PROTOX PROTOX inhibitors /// Wheat C.82 PROTOX PROTOX III inhibitors pitted fruit C.83 PROTOX PROTOX inhibitors /// pitted fruit C.84 PROTOX PROTOX inhibitors / // citrus C.85 EPSPS Glyphosate and / or Sulfosate Cotton C.86 EPSPS Glyphosate and / or Sulfosate Rice C 87 EPSPS Glyphosate and / or Sulfosate Brassica C.88 EPSPS Glyphosate and / or Sulfosate Potatoes C.89 EPSPS Glyphosate and / or Sulfosate Tomatoes C.90 EPSPS Curcubitaceous Glyphosate and / or Sulfosate C.91 EPSPS Glyphosate and / or Sulfosate Soy C.92 EPSPS Glyphosate and / or Sulfosate Corn C.93 EPSPS Glyphosate and / or Sulfosate Wheat C.94 EPSPS Glyphosate and / or Sulfosate pitted fruit C.95 EPSPS Glyphosate and / or sulphosate pitted fruit C.96 EPSPS Glyphosate and / or sulphosate citrus C.97 GS Glufosinate and / or Bialaphos Cotton C.98 GS Glufosinate and / or Bialaphos Rice C.99 GS Glufosinate and / or Bialafos Brassica C.100 GS Glufosinate and / or Bialafos Potatoes C.101 GS Glufosinate and / or Bialafos Tomatoes C.102 GS Glufosinate Curcubitaceous and / or Bialaphos Culture Tolerant Principle C.103 GS Glufosinate and / or Soy Bialaphos C.104 GS Glufosinate and / or Bialaphos Corn C.105 GS Glufosinate and / or Bialaphos Wheat C.106 GS Glufosinate and / or Bialafos fruit without stone C.107 GS Glufosinate and / or bialaphos fruit with stone C.108 GS Glufosinate and / or bialaphos citrus *** Sulphonylureas, Imidazolinones, Triazolpyrimidines, Dimeoxypyrimidines and N-Acylsulfonamides: Sulphonylureas such as Chlorosulfuron, Ethoxylamuron, , Metsui-furon, Primisulfuron, Prosulfuron, Triasulfuron, Cinosulfuron, Trifusulfuron, Oxasulfuron, Bensulfuron, Tribenuron ACC 322140, Fluzasulfuron, Etoxisulfuron, Nicosulfuron, Nicosulfuron, Rimsulfuron, Timsulfuron, Timsulfuron, Timsulfuron Sulfosulfuron, Amidosulfuron, Flupirsulfuron, CGA 362622 Imidazolinones such as Imazametabenz, Imazaquin, Imazametipyr, Imaze-tapir, Imazapir and Imazamox;

Triazolopyrimidines such as DE 511 Flumetsulam and Chloransulam; Dimethoxypyrimidines such as Piritiobac, Piriminobac, Bispiribac and Piriben-zoxim. +++ Tolerants to Diclofop-methyl, Fluazifop-P-butyl, Haloxifop-p-methyl, Haloxy-fop-P-ethyl, Quizalafop-P-ethyl, clodinafop propargil, fenoxaprop-ethyl, Tepraloxidim, Aloxidim, Setoxidim , Cycloxidim, Cloproxidim, Tralcoxidim, Butoxidim, Caloxidim, Cle-foxidim, Clethodim, &&& Chloroacetanilides such as Alaclor Acetochlor, Dimetenamid /// Protox Inhibitors: For example diphenylethers such as Acifluorfen Bifenifen, Clonofenifen, Clonoxen, Lactofen, Oxifluorfen; Tasi imidas such as Azafenidin, Carfentrazone-ethyl, Cinidon-ethyl, Flumichlorac-pentyl, Flumioxazin, Fluriacet-methyl, Oxadiargil, Oxadiazon, Pentoxazone, Sulfentrazone Irnidas and others, such as Fiumipropin, Flupropacil, Nipiraclof; Fluazotate and Pirafiufen-ethyl Biological Examples Table 39: A process of controlling representatives of the genus Adoxo-phyêS comprising the application of Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against the pest corresponds to one row in table C.

Table 40: A control process of Agrotis genus representatives comprising the application of Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against the pest corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 41: A process of controlling Alabama araiJacea.ê comprising the application of Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 42: A process of controlling Anticarsia gemmataüs comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 43: A process of controlling representative of the genus ChilcLCom-comprising the application of Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to one row of the table. C, Table 44: A process of controlling Clysia ambiguella comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one row in table C .

Table 45: A process of controlling representative of the genus Cnephalo-crocis comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 46: A process of controlling Crocidolomia binotalis comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 47: A process of controlling representative of the genus Cydia comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 48: A process of controlling Diparopsis castanea comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 49: A process of controlling representative of the genus Earias comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 50: A process of controlling representative of the genus Ephestia comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 51: A process of controlling representative of the genus Heliothis comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 52: A process of controlling Hellula undalis comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 53: A process of controlling Keiferia lycopersicella comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 54: A process of controlling Leucootera scitejla, comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 55: A process of controlling representative of the genus Lithoco.- .. Ilethis comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one row from table C.

Table 56: A process of controlling Lobesia botrana comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 57: A process of controlling Ostrinia nubilalis comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicide-resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 58: A process of controlling representative of the genus Pandemis comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 59: A process of controlling Pectinophora gossypiella comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 60: A process of controlling Phyllocnistis citrella comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 61: A process for controlling representative of the genus Pieris comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 62: A process of controlling Plutella xylostella comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 63: A process of controlling representative of the genus Scirpopha-ga comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 64: A process of controlling representative of the genus Sesamia comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 65: A process of controlling representative of the genus Spargano-this comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 66: A process of controlling representative of the genus Spodoptera comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C ..

Table 67: A process for controlling representative of the genus Tortrix comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 68: A process of controlling Trichoplusia ni comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 69: A process of controlling representative of the genus Agriotes comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 70: A process of controlling Anthonomus grandis comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 71: A process for controlling representative of the genus Curculio comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 72: A process of controlling Diabrotica balteata comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 73: A process of controlling representative of the genus Leptinotar-sa comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 74: A process of controlling representative of the genus Lissorhop-trus comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 75: A process of controlling representative of the genus Otiorhyn-chus comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 76: A process for controlling representative of the genus Aleurothri-xus comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 77: A process for controlling representative of the genus Aleyrodes comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 78: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aonidiella comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 79: A process of controlling representative of the Aphididae family comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 80: A representative Aphis control process comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 81: A process of controlling Bemisia tabaci comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 82: A process of controlling representative of the genus Empoasca comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 83: A process of controlling representative of the genus Mycus comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 84: A process of controlling representative of the genus Nephotettix comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 85: A process of controlling representative of the genus Nilaparvata comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 86: A process of controlling representative of the genus Pseudococcus comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 87: A process of controlling representative of the genus Psylla comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 88: A process of controlling representative of the genus Quadraspi-diotus comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 89: A process of controlling representative of the genus Schizaphis comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 90: A process of controlling representative of the genus Trialeuros-des comprising the application of Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 91: A process of controlling representative of the genus Lyriomyza comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 92: A process of controlling representative of the genus Oscineila comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 93: A process of controlling representative of the genus Phorbia comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 94: A process of controlling representative of the genus Franklinie-lla comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 95: A process of controlling representative of the genus Thrips comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 96: A process of controlling Scirtothrips aurantii comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 97: A process for controlling representative of the genus Aceria comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one row in table C .

Table 98: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aculus comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 99: A process of controlling representative of the genus Brevipalpüs comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 100: A process of controlling representative of the genus Pa-nonychus comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 101: A process of controlling representative of the genus Phyllo-coptruta comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 102: A process of controlling representative of the genus Tetrychus comprising the application of Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 103: A process of controlling representative of the Heterode-ra genus comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 104: A process of controlling representative of the genus Meloido-gyne comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 105: A process of controlling Mamestra brassica comprising applying Abamectin to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plant, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 106: A process of controlling representative of the genus Adoxo-phyes comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 107: A process of controlling representative of the genus Agrotis comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 108: A process of controlling Alabama argillaceae comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 109: A process of controlling Anticarsia gemmatalis comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 110: A process of controlling representative of the genus Chilo comprising the application of Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of table C.

Table 111: A process of controlling Clysia ambiguella comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 112: A process of controlling representative of the genus Cnephalo-crocis comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 113: A process for controlling Crocidolomia binotalis comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 114: A process of controlling representative of the genus Cydia comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 115: A process of controlling Diparopsis castanea comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 116: A process of controlling representative of the genus Earias comprising the application of Emamectinaa benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 117: A process of controlling representative of the genus Ephestia comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 118: A process of controlling representative of the genus Heliothis of Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 119: A process of controlling Hellula undalis comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 120: A process of controlling Keiferia lycopersicella comprising applying Emamectinaa benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 121: A process of controlling Leucoptera scitella comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 122: A process of controlling representative of the genus Lithoco-llethis comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 123: A process of controlling Lobesia botrana comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 124: A process of controlling Ostrinia nubilalis comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 125: A process of controlling representative of the genus Pandemis comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 126: A process of controlling Pectinophora gossypiella comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 127: A process of controlling Phyilocnistis citrella comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 128: A process of controlling representative of the genus Pieris comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 129: A process of controlling Plutella xylostella comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 130: A process of controlling representative of the genus Scirpo-phaga comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 131: A process of controlling representative of the genus Sesamia comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 132: A process of controlling representative of the genus Sparga-nothis comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 133: A process of controlling representative of the genus Spodopte-ra comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 134: A process of controlling representative of the genus Tortrix comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 135: A process of controlling Trichoplusia ni comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 136: A process of controlling representative of the genus Agriotes comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 137: A process of controlling Anthonomus grandis comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 138: A process of controlling representative of the genus Curculio comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 139: A process of controlling Diabrotica balteata comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 140: A process of controlling representative of the genus Leptino-tarsa comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 141: A representative control process of the genus Lis-sorhoptrus comprising the application of Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 142: A process of controlling representative of the genus Otiorhyn-chus comprising applying Emamectinaa benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 143: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aleurothri-xus comprising applying Emamectinaa benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 144: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aieyrodes comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 145: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aonidiella comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 146: A representative Aphididae control process comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 147: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aphis comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 148: A process of controlling Bemisia tabaci comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 149: A process of controlling representative of the genus Empoasca comprising applying Emamectinaa benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 150: A process of controlling representative of the genus Mycus comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 151: A process of controlling representative of the genus Nephote-ttix comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 152: A process of controlling representative of the genus Nilapar-vata comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 153: A process of controlling representative of the genus Pseudococcus comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 154: A process of controlling representative of the genus Psylla comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 155: A process of controlling representative of the Quadras-pidiotus genus comprising the application of Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 156: A process of controlling representative of the genus Schiza-phis comprising applying Emamectinaa benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 157: A process of controlling representative of the genus Trialeurodes comprising the application of Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 158: A process of controlling representative of the genus Lyriomyza comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 159: A process of controlling representative of the genus Oscinella comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 160: A process of controlling representative of the genus Phorbia comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 161: A process of controlling representative of the genus Frankiini-ella comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 162: A process of controlling representative of the genus Thrips comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 163: A process of controlling Scirtothrips aurantii comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 164: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aceria comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 165: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aculus comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 166: A process of controlling representative of the genus Brevipalpus comprising the application of Emamectinaa benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 167: A process of controlling representative of the genus Pa-nonychus comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 168: A process of controlling representative of the genus Phyllo-coptruta comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 169: A process of controlling representative of the genus Te-tranychus comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 170: A control process representative of the Heterode-ra genus comprising the application of Emamectinaa benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 171: A process of controlling representative of the genus Meloido-gyne comprising applying Emamectinaa Benzoate to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 172: A process of controlling representative of the genus Adoxo-phyes comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, in which the combination of the active principle expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to a table row C.

Table 173: A process of controlling representative of the genus Agrotis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 174: A process of controlling Alabama argillaceae comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 175: A process of controlling Anticarsia gemmatalis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 176: A process of controlling representative of the genus Chilo comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 177: A process of controlling Clysia ambiguella comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 178: A process of controlling Crocidolomia binotalis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 179: A process of controlling representative of the genus Cydia comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 180: A process of controlling Diparopsis castanea comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 181: A process of controlling representative of the genus Earias comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C Table 182: A process of controlling representative of the genus Ephestia comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the expressed active ingredient. by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against the plague corresponds to a row in table C.

Table 183: A process of controlling representative of the genus Heliothis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 184: A process of controlling Hellula undalis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 185: A process of controlling Keiferia lycopersicella comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 186: A process of controlling Leucoptera scitelia comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 187: A process of controlling representative of the genus Lithoeo-llethis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 188: A process of controlling Lobesia botrana comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 189: A process of controlling Ostrinia nubilalis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 190: A process of controlling representative of the genus Pandemis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 191: A process of controlling Pectinophora gossypiella comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 192: A process of controlling Phyllocnistis citrella comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 193: A process of controlling representative of the genus Pieris comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 194: A process of controlling Plutella xylostella comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 195: A process of controlling representative of the genus Scirpo-phaga comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 196: A process of controlling representative of the genus Sesamia comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 197: A process of controlling representative of the genus Sparga-nothis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against pest corresponds to a line of the table C.

Table 198: A process of controlling representative of the genus Spodoptera comprising the application of Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 199: A process of controlling representative of the genus Tortrix comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 200: A process of controlling Trichoplusia ni comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 201: A process of controlling representative of the genus Agriotes comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 202: A process of controlling Anthonomus grandis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 203: A process of controlling representative of the genus Curculio comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic crop and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 204: A process of controlling Diabrotica balteata comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 205: A process of controlling representative of the genus Leptino-tarsa comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 206: A process of controlling representative of the genus Lis-sorhoptrus comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 207: A process of controlling representative of the genus Otiorhyn-chus comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 208: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aleurothri-xus comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the Table C, Table 209: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aleyrodes comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line. Table A: A representative control process of the genus Aonidiella comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a tabel line to C.

Table 211: A process of controlling representative of the Aphididae family comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 212: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aphis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 213: A process of controlling Bemisia tabaci comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 214: A process of controlling representative of the genus Empoasca comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 215: A process of controlling representative of the genus Mycus comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one row in table C .

Table 216: A process of controlling representative of the genus Nephote-ttix comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 217: A process of controlling representative of the genus Nilapan-rata comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of table C.

Table 218: A process of controlling representative of the genus Pseudococcus comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 219: A process of controlling representative of the genus Psylla comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 220: A process of controlling representative of the Quadras-pidiotus genus comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 221: A process of controlling representative of the genus Schiza-phis comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 222: A process of controlling representative of the genus Trialeurus-des comprising the application of Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to a line of table C.

Table 223: A process of controlling representative of the genus Lyriomyza comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 224: A process of controlling representative of the genus Oscineila comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C .

Table 225: A process of controlling representative of the genus Phorbia comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 226: A process of controlling representative of the genus Franklini-ella comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a line of table C.

Table 227: A process of controlling representative of the genus Thrips comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 228: A process of controlling Scirtothrips aurantii comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Table 229: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aceria comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one row in table C .

Table 230: A process of controlling representative of the genus Aculus comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in table C .

Table 231: A process of controlling representative of the genus Brevipal-pus comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 232: A process of controlling representative of the genus Pa-nonychus comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 233: A process of controlling representative of the genus Phyllo-coptruta comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 234: A process of controlling representative of the genus Te-tranychus comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic plantation, wherein the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the plantation to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 235: A process of controlling representative of the Heterode-ra genus comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, in which the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 236: A process of controlling representative of the genus Meloido-gyne comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to one line of the table C.

Table 237: A process of controlling Mamestra brassica comprising applying Spinosad to a herbicidally resistant transgenic crop, where the combination of the active ingredient expressed by the transgenic plant and the crop to be protected against plague corresponds to a row in Table C.

Example B1: Action against adults of Anthonomus arandis. Spo-doptera littoralis or Heliothis virescens Young transgenic cotton plants expressing CrvIIIA delta endotoxin are sprayed with an aqueous emulsion spray mixture comprising 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm emamectin benzoate, respectively. After the spray coating has dried, the cotton plants are populated with 10 Aolhonomus arandis adults. 10 larvae of Spodootera littoralis or 10 larvae of Heliothis virescens respectively and placed in a plastic container. Evaluation occurs 3 to 10 days later. The reduction in the percentage in the population, or the reduction in the percentage of feeding damage (% action), is determined by comparing the number of dead beetles and feeding damage on transgenic cotton plants to non-transgenic cotton plants. were treated with an emulsion spray mixture comprising emamectin benzoate and standard CrylllA-toxin at a concentration of in each case 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm respectively.

In this test, the control of insects tested in the transgenic plant is superior, while it is insufficient in the non-transgenic plant.

Example B2: Action against adults Anthonomus arandis, Spo-doptera littoralis or Heliothis virescens Young transgenic cotton plants expressing CtylilA delta-endotoxin are sprayed with an aqueous emulsion spray mixture comprising 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm abamectin respectively. After the spray coating has dried, the cotton plants are populated with 10 adult Anthonomus grandis, 10 larvae of Spodoptera littoralis or 10 larvae of Heliothis virescens respectively and placed in a plastic container. Evaluation occurs 3 to 10 days later. The reduction in the percentage in the population, or the reduction in the percentage of feeding damage (% action), is determined by comparing the number of dead beetles and feeding damage on transgenic cotton plants to non-transgenic cotton plants. were treated with an emulsion spray mixture comprising abamectin and conventional CrylllA-toxin at a concentration of in each case 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm respectively.

In this test, the control of insects tested in the transgenic plant is superior, while it is insufficient in the non-transgenic plant.

Example B3: Action against adults Anthonomus grandis, Spo-doptera littoralis or Heliothis virescens Young transgenic cotton plants expressing the CrylilA delta endotoxin are sprayed with an aqueous emulsion spray mixture comprising 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm of spinosad, respectively. After the spray coating has dried, the cotton plants are populated with 10 adult Anthonomus grandis, 10 larvae of Spodoptera littoralis or 10 larvae of Heliothis virescens respectively and placed in a plastic container. Evaluation occurs 3 to 10 days later. The reduction in the percentage in the population, or the reduction in the percentage of feeding damage (% action), is determined by comparing the number of dead beetles and feeding damage on transgenic cotton plants to non-transgenic cotton plants. were treated with an emulsion spray mixture comprising spinosad and conventional CrylllA-toxin at a concentration of in each case 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm respectively.

In this test, the control of insects tested in the transgenic plant is superior, while it is insufficient in the non-transgenic plant.

Example B4: Action against adults Anthonomus grandis. Spodoptera littoralis or Heliothis virescens Young transgenic cotton plants expressing Crvla (c) delta endotoxin are sprayed with an aqueous emulsion spray mixture comprising 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm spinosad, respectively. After the spray coating has dried, the cotton plants are populated with 10 adult Anthonomus grandis, 10 larvae of Spodoptera litto-ralis or 10 larvae of Heliothis virescens respectively and placed in a plastic container. Evaluation occurs 3 to 10 days later. The reduction in the percentage in the population, or the reduction in the percentage of feeding damage (% action), is determined by comparing the number of dead beetles and feeding damage on transgenic cotton plants with that of non-cotton plants. GMOs which were treated with an emulsion spray mixture comprising spinosad and conventional CrylllA-toxin at a concentration of in each case 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm respectively.

In this test, the control of insects tested in the transgenic plant is superior, while it is insufficient in the non-transgenic plant.

Example B5: Action against adults Anthonomus grandis. Spodoptera littoralis or Heliothis virescens Young transgenic cotton plants expressing the Cryla (c) delta endotoxin are sprayed with an aqueous emulsion spray mixture comprising 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm abamectin, respectively. After the spray coating has dried, the cotton plants are populated with 10 adult Anthonomus grandis, 10 larvae of Spodoptera littoralis or 10 larvae of Heliothis virescens respectively and placed in a plastic container. Evaluation occurs 3 to 10 days later. The reduction in the percentage in the population, or the reduction in the percentage of feeding damage (% action), is determined by comparing the number of dead beetles and feeding damage on transgenic cotton plants to non-transgenic cotton plants. They were treated with an emulsion spray mixture comprising abamectin and conventional CrylllA-toxin at a concentration of in each case 100, 50.10, 5, 1 ppm respectively.

In this test, the control of insects tested in the transgenic plant is superior, while it is insufficient in the non-transgenic plant.

Example B6: Action against adults Anthonomus arandis. Spo-doptera littoralis or Heliothis virescens Young transgenic cotton plants expressing the Cryla (c) delta endotoxin are sprayed with an aqueous emulsion spray mixture comprising 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm abamectin, respectively. After the spray coating has dried, the cotton plants are populated with 10 adult Anthonomus grandis, 10 larvae of Spodoptera littoralis or 10 larvae of Heliothis virescens respectively and placed in a plastic container. Evaluation occurs 3 to 10 days later. The reduction in the percentage in the population, or the reduction in the percentage of feeding damage (% action), is determined by comparing the number of dead beetles and feeding damage on transgenic cotton plants to non-transgenic cotton plants. were treated with an emulsion spray mixture comprising emamectin benzoate and standard CrylllA-toxin at a concentration of in each case 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm respectively.

In this test, the control of insects tested in the transgenic plant is superior, while it is insufficient in the non-transgenic plant.

Example B7: Action against Ostrinia nubilalis. Spodootera spp. or Heliothis spp.

A piece of land planted with corn cv. KnockQut ® and an adjacent piece of land (b) of the same size that is planted to conventional size, showing both natural infestation with Ostrinia nu-bilalis. Spodoptera sp or Heliothis. are sprayed with an aqueous emulsion spray mixture comprising 200, 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm spinosad. Immediately thereafter, the patch (b) is treated with an aqueous emulsion spray mixture comprising 200,100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm of the KnockOut ® expressed endotoxin. The assessment takes place 6 days later. The percentage reduction in population (% action) is determined by comparing dead pests on the land plot plants (a) with those on the land plot plants (b). The improved control of Ostrinia nubilalis. Spodoptera so or Heliothis is observed in the plants of land (a), while land (b) shows a control level of no more than 80%.

Example B8: Action against Ostrinia nubilalis. Spodoptera sp or Heliothis sp A piece of land planted with maize cv. KnockOut® and an adjacent piece of land (b) of the same size that is planted with conventional maize, both showing natural infestation with Ostrinia nubilalis. Spodoptera sp or Heliothis. are sprayed with an aqueous emulsion spray mixture comprising 200, 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm abamectin. Immediately thereafter, a piece of earth (b) is treated with an emulsion spray mixture comprising 200, 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm of the KnockOut® expressed en-dotoxin. The assessment takes place 6 days later. The reduction in the percentage of the population (% action) is determined by comparing the number of dead pests in the plants of the land (a) with the plants in the land (b). The improved control of Ostrinia nubilalis. Spodoptera sp or Heliothis is observed in the plants of land (a), while land (b) shows a control level of no more than 80%.

Example B9: Action against Ostrinia nubilalis. Spodoptera sp or Heliothis sp A piece of land planted with maize cv. KoockOut®-is an adjacent piece of land (b) of the same size that is planted with conventional maize, both showing natural infestation with Ostrinia nubilalis. Spodoptera sp or Heliothis. are sprayed with an aqueous emulsion spray mixture comprising 200, 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm emamectin benzoate. Immediately thereafter, a piece of land (b) is treated with an emulsion spray mixture comprising 200, 100, 50, 10, 5, 1 ppm of KnockOut® expressed endotoxin. The assessment takes place 6 days later. The reduction in the percentage of the population (% action) is determined by comparing the number of dead pests in the plants of the land (a) with the plants in the land (b). Improved control of Ostrinia nubilalis, Soodoptera sp or Heliothis is observed in the plants of land (a), while land (b) shows a control level of no more than 80%. The invention also relates to (B) A process of proteaer plant propagation material and plant organs formed at a time after the pest attack, characterized in that by the fact that a pesticide comprising, as a pesticidally active compound, at least one macrolide compound, especially abamectin, emamectin or spinosad in free or salt form which may be used agrochemically as an active ingredient and at least one auxiliary in close proximity to or spatially in conjunction with planting or application propagating material is used at the planting or sowing site; the corresponding use of these compounds, corresponding to pesticides whose active ingredient is selected from among these compounds, a process of producing and using these compositions, and the plant propagation material thus protected against pest attack.

The macrolides used in accordance with the invention are known to those skilled in the art. They are in the class of substances as mentioned in part (A) of the invention. Abamectin and emamectin are preferred.

The agrochemically useful salts of the macrolides according to the invention are, for example, the same as in part (A) of the invention.

In the case of abamectin, the free form is preferred in the table of part (B) of the invention. Especially preferred within the scope of part (B) of the invention is a process wherein emamectin is employed in free form or as an agrochemically acceptable salt; especially as salt; in particular as benzoate, substituted benzoate, benzenesulfonate, citrate, phosphate, tartrate or maleate; preferably as benzoate or benzenesulfonate, especially preferably as benzoate. The subject matter scope of the invention (B) extends in particular to those of the Insecta, Arachnida and Nematoda classes.

These are mainly insects of the order Lepidoptera, for example Acleris spp., Adoxophyes spp., Aegeria spp., Agrotis spp., Alabama argilla-ceae, Amylois spp., Anticarsia gemmataiis, Archips spp., Argyrotaenia spp. spp., Busseola fusca, Cadra cautella, Carposina nipponensis, Chilo spp., Choristoneura spp., Clysia ambiguella, Cnaphalocrocis spp., Cnephasia spp., Cochylis spp. , Diatraea spp., Di-paropsis castanea, Earias spp., Ephestia spp., Eucosma spp., Eupoecilia ambiguella, Euproctis spp., Graphiteita spp., Hedya nubiferana, Heliothis spp. Hyphantria cunea, Kei-feria lycopersicella, Leucoptera scitella, Lithocoliethis spp., Lobesia botrana, Lymantria spp., Lyonetia spp., Malacosoma spp., Mamestra brassicae, Manduca Friday, Operophtera spp. , Panolis flammea, Pectinophora g Ossypiella, Phthorimaea operculella, Pieris rapae, Pieris spp., Plutella xylostella, Prays spp., Scirpophaga spp., Sesamia spp., Sparganothis spp., Synodhedon spp., Thaumetopoea spp. Yponomeuta spp .; Coleoptera, for example Agriotes spp., Anthonomus spp., Atomaria linearis, Chaetocnema tibialis, Cosmopolites spp., Curculio spp., Dermestes spp., Epila-chna spp., Eremnus spp., Leptinotarsa decemlinhopa spp., Melolontha spp., Orycaephilus spp., Otiorhynchus spp., Phlyctinus spp., Po-pillia spp., Psylliodes spp., Scarabeidae, Sitophilus spp., Sitotroga spp., Tenebrio spp. and Trogoderma spp .; Orthoptera, for example Biatta spp., Blattella spp., Gryllotalpa spp., Leucophaea maderae, Locusta spp., Periplaneta spp. and Schistocerca spp .; from the order Psocoptera, for example Liposcelis spp .; from the order Anoplura, for example Haematopinus spp., Linognathus spp., Pediculus spp., Pemphigus spp. and Phylloxera spp .; of the order Mallophaga, for example Damalinea spp. and Trichho-dectes spp .; from the order Thysanoptera, for example Frankliniella spp., Herci-nothrips spp., Taeniothrips spp., Thrips palmi, Thrips tabaci and Scirtothrips aurantii; of the order Heteroptera, for example Cimex spp., Distantiella the-obroma, Dysdercus spp., Euchistus spp. Eurygaster spp. Leptocorisa spp., Nezara spp., Piesma spp., Rhodnius spp., Sahlbergella singularis, Scotino-phara spp. and Triatoma spp .; Homoptera, for example Aleurothrixus floccosus, Aleyrodes brassicae, Aonidiella spp., Aphididae, Aphis spp., Aspidiotus spp., Bemisia tabaci, Ceroplaster spon. spp., Gascardia spp., Laodelphax spp., Lecanium corni, Lepi-dosaphes spp., Macrosiphus spp., Myzus spp., Nephotettix spp., Paratoria spp., Pemphigus spp., Planococcus spp. ., Pseudococcus spp., Psylla spp., Pulvinaria aethiopica, Quadraspidio-tus spp., Rhopalosiphum spp., Saissetia spp., Schizaphis spp., Sitobion spp. of the order Hymenoptera, for example Acromyrmex, Atta spp., Cephus spp., Diprion spp., Diprionidae, Gilpinia polytoma, Hoplocampa spp., Lasius spp., Monomorium pharaonis, Neodiprion spp., Solenopsis spp. and Vespa spp .; of the order Diptera, for example Aedes spp., Antherigona socca-ta, Bibio hortulanus, Calliphora erythrocephala, Ceratitis spp., Chrysomyia spp., Cutexbra spp., Dacus spp., Drosophila melanogaster, Fannia spp. ., Glossina spp., Hypoderma spp., Hyppobos-ca spp., Liriomyza spp., Lucilia spp., Melanagromyza spp., Musca spp., Orestrolia spp., Oscinella frit, Pegomyia hyoscyami, Phorbia spp. Rhagoletis pomonella, Sciara spp., Stomoxys spp., Tabanus spp., Tannia spp. and Tipula spp .; of the order Siphonaptera, for example Ceratophyllus spp. and Xe-nopsyila cheopis; or of the order Thysanura, for example Lepisma saccharina.

Among the Arachnida class, they are preferably representative of the order Acarina, for example Acarus siro, Aceria sheldoni, Aculus schlechtendali, Amblyomma spp., Argas spp., Boophilus spp., Brevipalpus spp., Bryobia praetiosa, Calipitrimerus spp. Dermanyssus gallinae, Eotetranychus carpini, Erio-phyes spp., Hyalomma spp., Ixodes spp., Olygonychus pratensis, Ornithodo-ros spp., Panonychus spp., Phyllocoptruta oleivora. ., Sarcoptes spp., Tarsonemus spp. and Tetranychus spp ..

Especially preferred is insect control of the orders Co-leoptera and Lepidoptera; in the order Colepotera especially the genus and species Agriotes spp., Anthonomus spp., Atomaria linearis, Chaetocnema tibialis, Diabrotica spp. and Leptinotarsa decemlineata; in the order Lepidoptera the genus and species Adoxophyes spp., Agrotis spp., Alabama argillaceae, Anticarsia gemmatalis, Chilo spp., Cydia spp., Ephestia spp., Heliothis spp., Keiferia lycopersicella, Maestra brassicae xylostella, Sesamia spp., Spodoptera spp., Tortrix spp. and Trichoplusia.

Another preferred subject according to part (B) of the invention is the control of representative of the Nematoda class, such as nodule nematodes, stem hook and leaf nematodes; especially Heterodera spp., for example Heterodera scha-chtii, Heterodora avenae and Heterodora trifolii; Globodera spp., For example Globodera rostochiensis; Meloidogyne spp., For example Meloidogyne inco-gyna and Meloidogyne javanica; Radopholus spp., For example Radopholus similis; Pratylenchus, for example Pratylenchus neglectans and Pratylenchus penetrans; Tylenchulus, for example Tylenchulus semipenetrans; Longido-rus, Trichodorus, Xiphinema, Ditylenchus, Aphelenchoides and Anguina, in particular Meloidogyne, for example Meloidogyne incognita, and Heterodera, for example Heterodera glycines.

The macrolides used according to the invention (B) are preventively and / or curatively valuable active ingredients in insect control fields, even at low application rates, although they are well tolerated by warm-blooded species, fish, insects and plants. The active ingredients used according to the invention are effective against all developmental stages or individual developmental stages of normally sensitive but also resistant pests. The action of the active ingredients used according to the invention may be directly apparent, ie in the form of pest destruction, which occurs immediately or only after some time has passed, for example during ecdysis, or indirectly, for example as an oviposition and / or reduced incubation rate, the good deed corresponding to a destruction (mortality) rate of at least 50 to 60%.

With the help of the active ingredients used in accordance with part (B) of the invention, it is possible to control, ie contain or destroy, pests that occur in plant propagation material, especially useful and ornamental plant propagation material in the environment. agriculture, horticulture and forests, and even plant organs that grow at a later time are also protected from these pests, ie protection lasts, for example, until mature plants have developed and material from propagation, or the plants that develop from them, is protected not only from pests that attack the air organs of the plant, but also from pests that inhabit the soil. The plant propagation material in part (B) of the invention, that is, for example, seedlings, rhizomes, nursery, cutting plants or, in particular seed (seeds), such as fruit, tubers, seeds or bulbs, are in particular cereal propagating material such as wheat, barley, rye, oats, rice, maize or sorghum; beet, such as sugar beet or fodder beet; fruit, for example pitted fruit, pitted fruit and soft fruit, for example apples, pears, plums, peaches, almonds, cherries or fruit-type, for example strawberry, raspberry and blackberry; in vegetables such as beans, lentils, peas or soybeans; in oil crops such as rapeseed, mustard, poppy, olive, sunflower, coconut, castor oil plants, cocoa or peanuts; in the pumpkin family such as pumpkin, cucumber or melon; in fiber plants such as cotton, flax, hemp or jute; in citrus fruits such as oranges, lemons, pomelo or tangerines; in vegetables such as spinach, lettuce, asparagus, cabbage species, carrots, onions, tomatoes, potatoes, beets or capsicum; Lauraceae, such as avocado, cinnamonium or camphor; or in tobacco, nuts, coffee, eggplant, sugar cane, tea, chili, vine, hops, Musaceae, latex or ornamental plants, especially cereal rice, cotton, corn, soybean, rapeseed, vegetables, potatoes, sunflower , sugar beet and sorghum. The genetically modified propagation material is preferably seed propagating material containing one or more genes expressing a pesticidal resistance, in particular an insecticidal or acaricidal resistance, but also a fungicidal or nematicidal resistance, which makes the plant resistant. herbicides, leading to greater resistance to plant diseases or introducing other agronomically advantageous properties into the plant. Such plants, or their propagating material, are in particular those containing a gene derived from a Bacillus thuringiensis and encoding an insecticidally active protein or containing a gene. These are especially genetically modified plant propagating materials of potatoes, alfalfa, cereals such as wheat, barley, rye, oats, rice, corn or sorghum; vegetables such as beans, lentils, peas or soybeans; beet such as sugar or fodder; oil crops such as rapeseed, mustard, poppy, olive, sunflower, coconut, castor oil, cocoa or peanut oil plants; curcubitaceae such as squash, cucumbers or melons; in fiber plants such as cotton, flax, hemp or jute; in citrus fruits such as oranges, lemons, pomelo or tangerines; in vegetables such as spinach, lettuce, asparagus, cabbage species, carrots, onions or tomatoes.

Examples of the genetically modified plant propagation material mentioned are, for example, the commercially available Maximizer® (KnockOut®), Yieldgard®, Roundup Ready Soybe-ans®, TC Biend® or NuCOTN 33B® products, all being known to those of ordinary skill in the art. technique.

Other fields of application for the active ingredients used according to the invention part (B) are, for example, the protection of stocked products or stocks or in the hygiene sector; in particular protection against pests of domestic animals or productive livestock. The invention of the subject matter (B) therefore also relates to corresponding pesticides for use to be selected depending on the intended purpose and the prevailing circumstances, such as emulsifiable concentrates, suspension concentrates, solutions which may be directly sprayed or diluted, pastes. dispersible, diluted emulsions, soluble powders, dispersible powders, wettable powders, fine powders, granules or encapsulations in polymeric substances comprising - at least one of the active ingredients used in accordance with the invention and the use of these insecticidal compositions for use in a process. A composition comprising only a macrolide compound, especially a salt thereof, is preferred.

In these compositions, the active ingredient is employed in pure form, for example a solid active ingredient in a special particle size or preferably together with - at least one of the conventionally used auxiliaries in the formulation technique such as diluents. , for example solid solvents or carriers or such as surface active (surfactant) compounds.

Suitable auxiliaries such as solvents, solid carriers, surfactant compounds, nonionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and anionic surfactants in the compositions employed according to the invention are, for example, those described in EP-A-736,252.

Liquid formulations for the treatment of plant propagating material according to the invention Part (B), especially seed, comprise, for example, surfactants (1 - 15% by weight), such as ethoxylated triphenophenols and salts. thereof, alkyl polyglycol ether ethoxylates, polyoxypropylene / polyoxyethylene copolymers, lignosulfonic acid sodium salt, polynaphthalenesulfonic acid salts and alkylbenzenesulfonic acid triethanolamine salt; antifreeze agents (5-15%), such as, for example, DL-propane-1,2-diol or propane-1,2,3-triol; dyes (1-10%), such as water soluble pigments or dyes; defoamers (0.05 -1%), such as polydimethylsiloxane; coatings (1-10%) such as polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyacrylate; coatings (0.1 -1%), such as 1,2-benzoylothiazol-3-one; thickeners (0.1 -1%) such as heteropolysaccharide and solvents such as water.

Solid formulations for treating plant propagation material, especially seed, include, for example: surfactants (1 - 10%), such as alkyl polyglycol ether ethoxylate, polyoxypropylene / polyoxyethylene copolymers, the acid sodium salt lignosulfonic acid, salts of polynaphthalenesulfonic acid; dyes (1-10%), such as water soluble pigments or dyes; defoamers (0.05 -1%), such as polydimethylsiloxane; coatings (1-10%), such as polyethylene glycol or cellulose; and vehicles (up to 100% weight / weight) such as silica powder, talcum powder, clays and the like.

As a rule, the compositions comprise 0.1 to 99%, in particular 0.1 to 95%, of active ingredient and 1 to 99.9%, in particular 5 to 99.9% of - at least - a solid auxiliary. or liquid, with 0 to 25%, in particular 0.1 to 20% being possible as a rule, of the compositions to be surfactant (% in each case weight percent). Although concentrated compositions are more preferred as commercially available goods, the end consumer will use, as a rule, dilute compositions that have much lower concentrations of active ingredient.

Preferred compositions such as emulsifiable concentrates, fine powders, suspension concentrates, wettable powders and granules have, for example, those compositions which are mentioned in EP-A-736,252.

The compositions according to the invention part (B) may also comprise other solid or liquid auxiliaries, such as stabilizers, for example non-epoxidized or non-epoxidized vegetable oils (e.g. epoxidized coconut oil, rapeseed or soybean oil), antiseptics. -fuming agents, for example silicone oil, preservatives, viscosity regulators, binders and / or tackifiers and also fertilizers or other active ingredients to achieve specific effects, for example bactericides, nematicides, molluscides or selective herbicides. The action of the compositions according to the invention part (B) may be considerably enhanced by the addition of other insecticidal, acaricidal and / or fungicidally active ingredients and adapted to prevailing circumstances. Suitable additions of insecticidal and acaricidally active ingredients are, for example, representative of the following classes of active ingredients: organophosphorous compounds, nitrophenols and derivatives, formamidines, triazine derivatives, nitroenamine derivatives, nitro- and cyanoguanidine derivatives, urea, benzoylureas, carbamates, pyrethroids, chlorinated hydrocarbons and Bacillus thuringiensis products. Especially preferred components in mixtures are NI-25, TI-304, TI-435, MTI-446, fipronil, lufenuron, pyripfoxifen, thiacloprid, fluxofenime; imidaclo-prid, thiamethoxam, fenoxycarb, diafenthiuron, pymetrozine, diazinon, disul-photon; profenofos, furathiocarb; cyromazin, cypermethrin, tau-fluvalinate, tefluthrin or Bacillus thuringiensis products, very especially NI-25, TI-304, TI-435, MTI-446, fipronil, tiacloprid, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, fenoxycarb, diafenthiuron, diafenthiulon, diafenthiuron, pyf ; profenofos, furathiocarb; cyromazin, cypermethrin, tau-fluvalinate, tefluthrin or Bacillus thuringiensis products, very especially NI-25, TI-304, TI-435, MTI-446, fipronil, tiacloprid, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and tefluthrin.

Examples of suitable additions of fungically active ingredients are the following compounds: azoxystrobin; bitertanol; carboxin;

Cu2Ü; cymoxanil; cyproconazole; cyprodinil; dichlofluamid; diphenoconazole; diniconazole; epoxyconazole; fenpiclonil; fludioxonil; fluquiconazole; flusyl zole; flutriafol; furalaxyl; guaztin; hexaconazole; hymexazole; imazalil; imiben-conazole; ipconazole; kresoxim-methyl; mancozeb; metaiazyl; R-metalazyl; metconazole; oxadixyl, pefurazoate; penconazole; pencycyron; prochloraz; propiconazole; pyroquilone; SSF-109; spiroxamin; tebuconazole; teflutrin; thiabendazole; thiifluamide; triazoxide; triadimeton; triadimenol; triflumizole; triticonazole and uniconazole.

The compositions to be used according to the invention part (B) are prepared in a known manner, for example in the absence of auxiliaries by grinding and / or sieving, for example to a special particle size or by compression of an active ingredient. solid, and in the presence of at least one auxiliary, for example by intimate mixing and / or milling of the active ingredient with the auxiliary / auxiliaries. These methods for preparing the compositions according to the invention and the use of macrolides for preparing these compositions are also subjects of the invention.

The application processes according to the invention part (B) for the protection of plant propagation material, which according to the invention is any plant material capable of developing complete plants after planting or sowing to the planting site. or sowing, for example seedlings, rhizomes, young seedlings, cut or, in particular seed (seeds), such as fruits, tubers, grains or bulbs, against pest attack are characterized by the fact that, for example, compositions are applied. suitable in such a way that they are applied in close to or spatial proximity and together with planting or seeding the propagating material to the planting or seeding site occurs according to the invention, preferably prior to planting or seeding the material propagation by applying the soil application compositions directly to the site where the propagating material for example before sowing in the seed furrow or to a closely limited area around the planting site or seeding propagating material. The application of such compositions, which occurs spatially together with the planting or application of propagating material to the planting or sowing site, shall be understood to mean that the propagating material that has been pretreated with these compositions is planted or sown. at the planting or sowing site and it is possible, depending on the intended targets and the prevailing circumstances, for the pretreatment of the propagating material to be effected for example by spraying, spraying, spraying or diffusing the compositions onto the propagating material. spreading or brushing or pouring the compositions onto the propagating material or, in the event of seed, in particular also by seed treatment. When seed treatment is carried out, which is preferred according to the invention, ie dry seed, wet seed treatment, liquid seed treatment or suspension treatment, a suitable pesticide is added to the seed prior to sowing in a seed treatment apparatus and the composition is distributed evenly over the seed, for example by shaking the contents of the seed treatment apparatus and / or by rotating and / or shaking the entire seed treatment apparatus. Special embodiments of such a seed treatment include, for example, dipping the seed into a liquid composition, coating the seed with a solid composition (seed coating) or achieving penetration of the active ingredient in the seed by adding the composition to the water used for seed pre-dressing (seed soaking). Typical application rates for the seed treatment compositions according to the invention are, for example, between 0.1 and 100 g of active ingredient per 100 kg of seed, in particular between 1 and 60 g / 100 kg of seed. preferably between 4 and 40 g / 100 kg of seed. The seed treatment according to the invention part (B) comprises in particular that as a result of the low toxicity of the active ingredient used, good tolerance is observed by the birds of the treated seed, for example in the case of birds that, being eaters In the open field, they tend to take seed from newly sown fields, such as black thunderbirds, blackbirds, thrushes, ducks, pheasants, finches, geese, robins, chickens, rooks, larks, seagulls, crows, partridges, wood pigeons. , goldfinches, pigeons or green goldfinches. The seed treatment according to the invention also extends to the stored seed treatment. Commercial plant propagation material that has been pretreated according to the invention part (B) is another subject of the invention.

Examples of macrolide compound formulations which may be used in the process according to the invention (B) are solutions, granules, fine powders, sprayable powders, emulsion concentrates, coated granules and suspension concentrates, are of the type as follows. has been described, for example, in EP-A-580,553, Examples F1 to F10.

Example F1: General Procedure for Liquid Seed Treatment The required amount of liquid formulation is placed in an Erlenmeyer vial. The vial is shaken to distribute the liquid throughout the bottom of the container. The required amount of seed is introduced into the vial immediately thereafter. The vial is shaken vigorously and manually for approximately one minute so that all seed is covered with liquid. The contents of the bottle are poured onto a drying rack and dried in an oven.

Example F2: General Procedure for Dry Seed Treatment Several wide neck vials are filled with the same number of seed grains and each vial is loaded with such an amount of wettable powder that the desired amount of active ingredient per grain of seed is obtained. seed (eg 0.03, 0.1 or 0.3 mg per grain). The vials are placed on a cylinder and spun for three minutes at 80 revolutions per minute. The seed grains that are attached to the vial walls are then undocked by manual shaking and the vials are rotated in the opposite direction for three minutes.

Biological examples (% = weight percent unless otherwise specified) Example B4: Seed treatment action against Spodoptera littoralis first instar larvae on maize leaves Corn seeds are sown and treated as described. in procedure F1. 12, 19, 26, 33, 40 and 47 days after sowing, 5-8 cm long sections of leaves from the top of the plants are placed in glass beakers and infested with a predetermined amount of a larval suspension. Newly hatched L1 from Spodoptera littoralis. The bécheres are capped and kept at 25 ° C, 60% relative atmospheric humidity and a 16 hour daylight cycle. The evaluation occurs three to five days after the infestation. The percentage of population reduction (% action) is determined by comparing the number of surviving larvae on the grown plants from treated and untreated seeds.

Example B5: Seed treatment action against adult Diabrotica balteata on sugar beet leaves Sugar beet seeds were sown and treated as described in procedure F1. 33, 40, 47, 54 and 61 days after sowing, the leaves in each case of three to five plants are placed in a glass beaker and infested with a predetermined number of young adult Di-abrotica balteata. The bécheres are capped and kept at 25 ° C, 60% relative atmospheric humidity and a 16 hour daylight cycle. The evaluation occurs three to five days after the infestation. The percentage reduction in population (% action) is determined by comparing the number of surviving adult Diabrotica on grown plants from treated and untreated seeds.

Example B6: Seed treatment action against third instar larvae of Diabrotica balteata on maize roots Corn seeds were treated as described in procedure F1 and sown. 14, 21 and 28 days after sowing in each case five third instar larvae of Diabrotica balteata are placed on the bottom of each potted plant. Evaluation occurs 6 days after infestation.

The data recorded are the number of instar survivors (larvae and pupae) on the stem of the plants, on the soil surface and in the soil. The percentage reduction in population (% action) is determined by comparing the number of surviving larvae and pupae on plants grown from treated and untreated seeds and their environment.

Example B7: Seed treatment action against Aohis fabae A glass vial or plastic container is filled with 100 g of bean seeds and such an amount of an active ingredient formulation that a ratio of 0.1, 1 is achieved. or 10 g of active ingredient per kg of seed. The active ingredient is evenly distributed over the seed surface by rotating and / or shaking the container. Seeds that have been treated in this way are sown in flower pots (3 seeds per pot). The seedlings are grown in a greenhouse at 25 to 30 ° C until they reach the 2-leaf stage and then populated with Aphis fabae. 6 days after the population, the test is evaluated. The percentage reduction in population (% action) is determined by comparing the number of surviving individuals on cultivated plants from treated and untreated seeds.

In this test, the good action is shown by abamectin, emamectin or spinosad.

Example B8: Seed Treatment Action against Mvzus persicae A glass vial or plastic container is filled with 100 g of sugar beet seed and such an amount of an active ingredient formulation prepared with a sprayable powder and a little water, giving a ratio of 0.1, 1 or 10 g of active ingredient per kg of seed. The closed seed treatment container is shaken over a cylinder until the paste is evenly distributed over the seed surface. Seeds that have been treated (coated) in this way are dried and sown in loess soil in plastic pots. The seedlings are grown in a greenhouse at 24 to 26 ° C, a relative atmospheric humidity of 50 to 60% and a daily lighting time of 14 hours. 4 weeks after germination, the plants, which are 10 cm tall, are populated with a mixed Myzus persicae population. The evaluation occurs 2 and 7 days after the plants were populated. The percentage reduction in population (% action) is determined by comparing the number of surviving individuals on cultivated plants from treated and untreated seeds.

In this test good action by abamectin, emamectin and spinosad is shown. The invention further relates to (C) A process for controlling wood and mollusk Draa, characterized in that a pesticidally active amount of a pesticide comprising as pesticidally active compound comprising at least one macrolide compound is applied. preferably abamectin, emamectin or spinosad, in free form or in salt form used in agrochemicals, as an active ingredient and at least one adjunct to pests in their environment; the corresponding use of these compounds, the corresponding pesticides whose active ingredient is selected from these compounds, a process for the preparation of and use of these compositions and the plant propagation material thus protected from pest attack.

The macrolide compounds used according to the invention are the same as those mentioned under aspect (A) of the invention. In addition, the salt as mentioned under part (A) of the invention. In the case of abamectin, the free form according to the invention is preferred. Especially preferred for the purposes of the present invention is a composition comprising emamectin in free form or as an agrochemical tolerated salt as the only pesticidally active component; especially as salt; more especially as benzoate, substituted benzoate, benzenesulfonate, citrate, phosphate, tartrate or maleate; preferably as benzoate or benzenesulfonate, especially preferably as benzoate.

A large number of different classes of active ingredient are mentioned in the literature as active ingredients that act arthropodically for the control of gastropods and termites. Surprisingly, it has been found that compounds known under the collective term macrolides also exhibit important mollusc and cupinicidal activity, specifically against gastropods such as slugs and snails and against wood pests, in particular representative of the Isoptera order.

Mollusks include, for example, Ampullariidae; Arion (A. ater, A. circumscriptus, A. hortensis, A. rufus); Bradybaenidae (Bradybaen fruticum); Cepaea (C, hortensis, C. Ne-moralis); Cochlodine; Deroceras (D. agrestis, D. Empiricorum, D. laeve, D. reticulatum); Discus (D. rotundatus); Euomphalia; Galba (G. trunculata); He-licella (H. itala, H. obvia); Helicidae (Helicigona arbustorum); Helicodiscus; Helix (H. presses); Umax (L. cinereoniger, L. flavus, L. marginatus, L. maxi-mus, L. tenellus); Lymnaea; Milax (M. gagates, M. marginatus, M. sowerbyl); Opeas; Pomacea (P. canaticulata); Vallonia and Zenitoides.

Termites include in particular the families Hodotermitidae, Kalotermitidae, Rhinotermitidae and Termitidae. It should be understood that other pests that harm wood by feeding on wood, using wood as a substrate or reproducing on wood, mean for example Xylocopa virginica and the Anobiblidae family, such as Anobium punctatum.

Slugs and snails as pests in horticulture and agriculture are a growing problem. They can cause severe damage to plants by feeding and can also cause dirt to accumulate through the slug and snail mucus and feces. New changes in crop control have led to more varieties of plant species that are sensitive to snails and snails, and the obligation to dispense with burning stubble fields - which is based on the ecological approach - and instead the act straw plowing suggests that problems with mollusks, especially problems with slugs, will be made worse.

Termites are capable of inflicting substantial damage to buildings in particular at geographical latitudes between 42 ° N and 42 S °. In principle, two types of termites can be distinguished: Termites living underground - the most widely distributed type - require warm air and a humid environment. In order to always have the necessary moisture available, these termites must have direct access to moist soil. Damage caused by subterranean termites is always virtually associated with damage to wood.

Termites that use dry wood as their substrate represent - even less frequently - a major problem as they do not require contact with moist soil. They penetrate the buildings below the wooden slats of the ceiling, through open spaces and through the ventilation holes. Others are brought home with already infested pieces of furniture. Wood pretreatment is considered the most effective method of controlling such termites. Termite damage from dry wood is caused more slowly than termite damage from a humid environment, so termite damage from the first type is found predominantly in old buildings.

Damage caused by termites living underground in a humid environment can be prevented by applying insecticidally active substances to termites or their environment. Such compounds are conventionally employed primarily for application to the ground around buildings.

Gastropodicides which are commonly and commercially available comprise metalldehyde and carbamates such as, for example, metho-carb. Carbamates are highly effective as mollusc, but have the serious disadvantage of being highly toxic to mammals such as, for example, cats, dogs and hedgehogs, and other organisms such as worms, which should be left alone. Although metaldehyde mollusks exhibit lower toxicity, they are not lethal to mollusks but have an anesthetizing or dehydrating effect, thereby immobilizing pests. There is therefore a demand for a useful mollusc that is highly effective against, for example, slugs and curls, but does not have or have a very low toxic effect on worms such as worms and mammals. This objective is achieved with the macrolide compounds of the present invention.

In addition, the commonly available termite control compositions are unsatisfactory in all respects as generally relatively large areas around building constructions or the buildings themselves must be treated with large amounts of insecticide. This can lead to secondary problems, particularly in the case of persistent pesticides, especially in homes. In this case too, there is therefore an additional demand for improved solutions, in particular by applying active ingredients that can be employed in particularly low amounts and which have low volatility. Part (C) of the invention also relates to pesticides such as emulsifiable concentrates, suspension concentrates, sprayable or directly diluted solutions, spreadable pastes, diluted emulsions, sprayable powders, soluble powders, dispersible powders , wettable powders, fine powders, granules, pellets or encapsulations in polymeric substances, all of which must be chosen to suit the intended purpose and the prevailing circumstances and which comprise at least one of the active ingredients according to the invention. The active ingredient is employed in these compositions in pure form, for example a solid active ingredient in a special particle size, or preferably together with at least one of the auxiliaries or vehicles conventionally used in formulation technology.

Examples of formulation aids are solid carriers, solvents, stabilizers, slow release aids, colorants and, if appropriate, surfactants (surfactants). Suitable vehicles and auxiliaries are all substances conventionally used in crop protection products, in particular gastropodicides. Suitable auxiliaries such as solvents, solid carriers, surfactant compounds, nonionic surfactants, cationic surfactants, anionic surfactants and other auxiliaries in the compositions employed according to the invention are, for example, those described in EP-A- 736,252.

Other suitable substances that can be used as vehicles for mollusks are phage stimulators, i.e. baits and / or food (ie substances that can be used physiologically by slugs and snails) usually contained in bait formulations. Mixtures of phage stimulators with other organic and / or inorganic carriers may also be used.

Mollusc phage stimulators are preferably ground cereals, such as for example wheat flour, barley flour, rye flour as well as rice starch, ground soybeans, fish meal, molasses, ground rapeseed and the like. It is possible to employ only one phage stimulator or a mixture of phage stimulators.

To make the bait more palatable for molluscs, one or more of the following substances may be used as an additive to slug and snail bait: (a) a vitamin B, in particular Β1, B2, nicotinic acid or nicotinamide; b) vitamin E; c) animal or plant proteinaceous material, for example albumin and its hydrolytic degradation products, in particular those obtained by enzymatic hydrolysis, for example by pepsin, such as metaproteins, proteases, peptones, polypeptides, peptides, diketopiperazines and amino acids; d) one or more amino acids or salts or amides thereof, which may also be synthetic products; e) a nucleic acid or hydrolytic degradation product thereof, such as a nueleotide, nucleoside, adenine, guanine, cytosine, uracil or thymine; f) urea, carbamic acid; g) an ammonium salt, for example ammonium acetate; h) an amino sugar, for example glucosamine or galactosamine; (i) sodium, potassium, calcium or magnesium compounds or traces of manganese, copper, iron, cobalt, zinc, aluminum, boron or molybdenum compounds, in particular chelates thereof, such as as Ver-sene®; j) phosphoric acid or glyceryl or sugar phosphates; k) water.

The stabilizers may all be known food stabilizers that have a fungistatic, fungicidal, bacteriostatic and / or bactericidal action such as sodium benzoate, methyl p-hydroxybenzoate, cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide, citric acid, tartaric acid, sorbic acid, phenols. alkylphenols or chlorinated phenols.

The slow release auxiliaries that may be employed include, in addition to the substances mentioned as solid carriers, resins such as urea / formaldehyde resins, soy flour, waxes, stearates and oils such as castor oil.

Substances which may be employed as mollusc adjuvants according to part (C) of the invention are, for example, binders such as methylcellosolve, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol, polyacrylates, polymethylates, natural waxes, chemically modified waxes and synthetic waxes, sugars. , starch, alginates, agar, lignosulfonates and gum arabic, humectants such as polyalcohols, for example sugars or glycerol, preservatives, colorants, slug bait and snails, repellents for warm blood species and / or other formulation aids. Combinations with known molluscally active ingredients, for example metaldehyde or mercaptodimetur, are also possible.

The formulation steps may be complemented by mixing, granulating (granulating) and, if appropriate, compressing (pills, tablets, pellets).

Mollusc compositions which preferably comprise other carriers and / or auxiliaries in addition to the active ingredient are preferably present in ready-to-use form as sprayable powders, crawler powders, as granules (the active ingredient being present as a mixture with the material). vehicle) or as a pellet. Especially preferred formulations are crawler powders, granules or pellets.

Formulations which are specifically suitable for shellfish control according to part (C) of the invention are granules or pellets comprising, as a rule, 0 to 90%, preferably 0 to 70%, carrier material, 0.1 up to 10%, preferably 1 to 5%, active ingredient, 10 to 95%, preferably 25 to 90%, phage stimulator, 0.5 to 25%, preferably 5 to 20%, binder and, if appropriate .0 to 15% of other auxiliaries (% in each case weight percent). The amount to be applied in each case as gastropodicide is not critical as a result of the lack of or low toxicity to warm-blooded species and depends on the prevailing circumstances such as the severity of the infestation, climatic conditions and the plants to be protected. . The application rate of bait types according to the invention may be varied within a substantial range. In general, between 3 and 15 kg of snail and slug bait are used per hectare, preferably between 5 and 10 kg per hectare. Conveniently, gastropodicides are distributed as evenly as possible among crop plants by borating an aqueous suspension or diffusing the powders, granules or pellets into the soil. If plant protection is not dense, it may also be convenient to establish “trail strips” around the plants to be protected.

As the gastropodicides according to the invention are clearly well tolerated by plants, no limitations apply to the plants to be protected. Thus, all ornamental and crop plants in agriculture, forests and horticulture (also in greenhouses) at all stages of growth can be protected against slug and snail damage. The formulation and use of slug and snail baits according to the invention and compositions for controlling wood pests can be seen in the following examples.

The compositions to be used according to the invention part (C) for the control of gastropods and wood pests are prepared in known manner, in the absence of auxiliaries for example by grinding and / or sieving, for example to obtain a size. particulate matter or by compression of a solid active ingredient and in the presence of at least one auxiliary for example by intimate mixing and / or milling of the active ingredient with the auxiliary / auxiliaries. These processes for the preparation of the compositions according to the invention and the use of macrolide compounds for the preparation of these compositions are also the subject of the invention.

As a rule, the compositions in the table of part (C) of the invention comprise 0.1 to 99%, in particular 0.1 to 95%, of active ingredient and 1 to 99.9%, in particular 5 to 99.9%. , of - at least - a solid or liquid auxiliary, it being possible, as a rule, that surfactants account for 0 to 25%, in particular 0.1 to 20%, of the compositions (% in each case is percent by Weight). Although concentrated compositions are more preferred as commercially available articles, the consumer generally uses dilute compositions that have much lower concentrations of active ingredient. The activity of the compositions according to the invention may be considerably enhanced by the addition of other active ingredients e.g. insecticide, acaricide and / or fungicidally active and adapted to the prevailing circumstances. Examples of suitable added active ingredients are the same as those mentioned under part (B) of the invention.

In an especially preferred embodiment of the invention, the macrolide compound is used for the control of termites and other wood-destroying pests in the soil, thereby achieving indirect protection of lumber constructions. Sufficient macrolide compound is applied to the soil to control pests, preferably at an application rate of 1 g to 2000 g per hectare, especially 2 to 200 g, in particular 5 to 100 g.

Worker termites must work on pesticide-treated soil to gain access to wood. Inevitably, they will absorb some of the pesticide and bring it back to the termite colony and thus spread the active ingredient in the termite colony. The active ingredient (s) may also be applied in the form of bait, for example in the form of tablets comprising the active ingredient, as described in US Patent No. 5,096,710. Especially and preferably, the macrolide compound is applied to the materials that are used by termites as food and building materials for the termite colony. Examples of such materials are board, paper, fine wood dust, cellulose powder or cotton. Useful concentrations of these materials are 0.01 to 10,000 ppm. Such baits are especially effective even when pheromones are additionally employed and wood that has already been attacked by fungi is used. Such uses are discussed, for example, in US Patent No. 5,151,443.

The macrolide compounds according to the invention part (C) are preventive and / or curatively valuable ingredients with a very favorable biocidal spectrum in the field of mollusk and wood pest control, even at low concentrations of use and are well tolerated. warm-blooded species, fish and plants. The active ingredients according to the invention are active against all or individual stages of shellfish and pest development in a normally sensitive but also resistant manner, especially termites. The mollusc action of the active ingredients according to the invention may manifest directly, ie in the destruction of the pests, either immediately or only after some time or indirectly, for example at a reduced rate of oviposition and / or hatching. , the good deed corresponding to a destruction rate (mortality) of at least 50 to 60%.

By using the active ingredients according to the invention part (C), it is possible to control, i.e. contain or destroy, damage by particular molluscs on plants, especially on useful and ornamental plants in agriculture, horticulture and forests. or pests of the kind mentioned above that occur on organs of such plants, such as fruits, flowers, foliage, stems, tubers, or roots, and in some cases even plant organs that grow at a later time are further protected against these pests.

Suitable target cultures for mollusc control are in particular cereals such as wheat, barley, rye, oats, rice, maize or sorghum; beet, such as sugar beet or fodder beet; fruits, for example pitted fruits, pitted fruits and soft fruits, such as apples, pears, plums, peaches, almonds, cherries, for example strawberries, raspberries or blackberries; vegetables such as beans, lentils, peas or soybeans; in oil crops such as rapeseed, mustard, poppy, olive, sunflower, coconut, castor oil plants, cocoa or peanuts; in the pumpkin family such as pumpkin, cucumber or melon; in fiber plants such as cotton, flax, hemp or jute; in citrus fruits such as oranges, lemons, pomelo or tangerines; in vegetables such as spinach, lettuce, asparagus, cabbage species, carrots, onions, tomatoes, potatoes, beets or capsicum; the laurel family, such as avocado, cinnamonium or camphor; and tobacco, nuts, coffee, eggplant, sugar cane, tea, bell pepper, vine, hops, banana family, latex and ornamental plants.

Other fields of application for the active ingredients according to the invention part (C) are the protection of stocked products and stocks and materials of mollusks and wood pests.

The compositions according to the invention part (C) are also suitable for the protection of plant propagating material, for example seed, such as fruits, tubers or plant grains or propagules, against gastropods and termites, especially against gastropods. Propagating material may be treated with the composition prior to planting, for example from seed prior to sowing. Alternatively, the active ingredients according to the invention may be applied to seed grains (coating) either by dipping the grains in a liquid composition or by coating them with a solid composition. Alternatively, the composition may be applied to the planting site when propagating material is being planted, for example in the seed furrow during sowing. These treatment methods for plant propagation material and thus treated plant propagation material are further subjects of the invention.

The following examples are intended to illustrate part (C) of the invention. They give it limitation.

Examples of tormulation Example F3: Preparation of snail pellets 40 kg ground rapeseed (extracted / un extracted ground rapeseed ratio = 65:35), 2.6 kg of a finely ground premix comprising 2, 1 kg macrolide compound and 500 g highly dispersed silica, 4.7 kg cold cross-linked corn starch, 540 g urea / formaldehyde resin, 100 g isopropanol, 3 kg sugar beet molasses and 140 g Blue dyes (1,4-di (isobutylamino) anthraquinone) are introduced in succession into a blender and mixed intimately. This is followed by compression molding. The product is allowed to cool and dry and the fines are removed using a 0.5 mm mesh. This provides a formulation for slug and snail bait.

Instead of the compression molding process, another usual compaction process can also be used for preparing the slug and snail bait formulation.

Examples of use Example A1: Test for determining the effectiveness of the slug and snail pellets against Deroceras reticulatum The effectiveness of the slug and snail pellets against small slug species, for example the Deroceras species, is tested on polycarbonate housings with a base. 17 cm x 22 cm. The bottom of the box is covered with several layers of cellulose paper which is sufficiently moist. Slug and snail pellets are evenly spread over half of the test area at an application rate of 20 particles; the other half remains untreated. To avoid forced behavior, untreated supplementary feed is provided to the slugs: two potato halves arranged at diagonally opposite corners of the box. 10 adult crosslinked field slugs (Deroceras reticulatum) are introduced into the area and atmospheric humidity is kept virtually constant throughout the test period: 19 ° and relative atmospheric humidity of 90 to 95%. The state of the slugs is checked and evaluated daily for seven consecutive days. When assessing efficacy, the mortality rate and the number of animals showing symptoms of damage are taken into account.

In this test, the macrolide compounds according to the invention are very effective.

Example A2: Test to determine the effectiveness of slug and snail pellets against Arion rufus The effectiveness of slug and snail pellets against larger species of slug is tested in plastic test boxes fitted with a wire mesh. Each box has a base of 0.25 m2. The bottom of the box is covered by a 2 to 3 cm deep layer of compost. The fertilizer is moistened sufficiently before the start of the experiment. Slug and snail pellets are evenly distributed over the left half of the experimental area at an application rate of 3.1 g; half of the side remains untreated. To avoid forced behavior, untreated supplementary food is administered additionally to the slugs; two potato halves arranged at diagonally opposite corners of the box. 10 adult red slugs (Arion rugus) are introduced into the untreated area of each box. Each test is replicated four times. Temperature and atmospheric humidity are kept virtually constant throughout the test period: 19 ° and relative atmospheric humidity from 90 to 95%. The state of the slugs is checked and evaluated daily for seven consecutive days. When assessing efficacy, the mortality rate and the number of animals showing symptoms of damage are taken into account.

In this test, the macrolide compounds according to the invention are very effective.

Example A3: Test to determine systemic efficacy against Deroceras reticulatum a) Lettuce plants A test solution is prepared by dissolving a sample of a macrolide compound in 1 mL of acetone and completing the solution with water to 50 mL. The roots, previously cleaned with fresh water, of 6 cm tall young lettuce plants are immersed for at least two days in this solution. For each test, the individual leaves of these lettuce plants were cut and placed on a filter paper to keep the leaves moist during the experiment. Then two medium-sized slugs are introduced into each petri dish and the amount of leaves consumed and the mortality over a two-day period are determined.

In this test, the macrolide compounds according to the invention have a good action. b) Seed Batches of 10 slugs are introduced into 5 sealed boxes containing fertilizer that have a base of 35 cm x 20 cm. In each case are spread evenly in four boxes 100 grains of winter wheat. In the fifth box, 50 treated winter wheat grains are distributed on one side of the box and 50 untreated winter wheat grains on the other side of the box to test the repellent action.

In this test, the macrolide compounds according to the invention are very effective.

Example A4: Action against Termites Wood baits are treated with different amounts of macrolide compound and their effect on termite hatching rate and survival is tested. Solutions with concentrations of 0 ppm, 0.1 ppm, 100 ppm and 1000 ppm of the test substance in acetone are used. Water is used in the control study. The baits consist of pine wood that was kept in a natural environment for four months.

Termites are collected from outdoor infested pieces of wood. To carry out the wood bait study, the wood is kept for 48 hours in a greenhouse at 80 ° C. The dried wood is then weighed and the pieces are placed for 18 hours in solutions of the active ingredient at the desired concentration. The pieces of wood are then removed from the solutions, air dried and weighed. To determine the action of the bait against termites, the wood chips thus treated are placed on a thin layer of untreated soil in petri dishes.

Termites (50 workers and 2 warriors) are introduced into each Petri dish. The plates are inspected three times a week over a period of 8 weeks. Insect development, abnormalities and modalities are recorded. After 8 weeks, the logs are washed with water and dried again in an oven for 48 hours at 80 ° C. Again, the weight of each piece of wood is subsequently determined. The weight differential corresponds to the amount of wood consumed by termites.

In this test, the macrolide compounds according to the invention are very effective.

Claims (4)

1. A process for controlling insects in useful transgenic plant crops expressing the CrylAb protein, characterized in that a pesticidal composition comprising free or salt-based Abamectin, agrochemicals, is applied to pests or their environment. useful as an active ingredient and at least one auxiliary. Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that the foliage of the transgenic plant is treated. Process according to Claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the transgenic crop of useful plants is maize. Process according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the transgenic crop of useful plants is soybean.