Rare Earths In Greenland

I wrote a short thread on Bluesky a week or so ago about mineral deposits, since they seem to loom so large in Donald Trump’s thinking. The Times (London) has an article that responds to many of my checkpoints from that thread, so I’ll put them side by side here. My checkpoints in italics.

Having a resource in the ground means next to nothing.  Greenland is known to have two very large deposits of rare earth minerals on its southern tip – the Kvanefjeld complex and the Tanbreez deposit, which may be the second largest on earth, after the Bayan Obo deposit in China.

Read More

No, There Is Not A Nuclear Weapon On Nanda Devi

In the world that talks about nuclear weapons, a device is a nuclear explosive without a delivery vehicle. This is fairly generally known, by physicists and political scientists, along with many of the general public. But “device” is, in other contexts, a neutral word referring to pretty much anything mechanical. If you want to get clicks, you can leverage the two definitions, which is what the New York Times did (gift link).

In 1965, the CIA tried to set up a detection station for Chinese nuclear tests on Nanda Devi in the Himalayas. The first several paragraphs of the Times article don’t give the date. Having been teased by the implication of nuclear weapons in the headline, I wondered if this was recent. The date eventually appears.

Those paragraphs include a very scary plutonium fact.

The climbers scampered down the mountain after stashing the C.I.A. gear on a ledge of ice, abandoning a nuclear device that contained nearly a third of the total amount of plutonium used in the Nagasaki bomb.

Okay, something is wrong here. This “device” may not contain enough plutonium for a nuclear explosion, so it’s probably not a device. A little later,

Read More

I Am So Tired

[This post is very personal. I think it needs to be said, because I am not the only one feeling this way. I posted it at Lawyers, Guns & Money and immediately got a jocular response. So I deleted it. I’m not allowing comments here. Just please read and think.]

Reading about Jeffrey Epstein through one more round of media coverage makes me very tired. It is a heavy tiredness, the tiredness that comes when you have heard the same things again and again, the tiredness that comes when one day looks like the one before looks like many years ago.

None of the things being pulled out of the latest tranche of many thousand emails is new. They have been reported on and have slipped away and reported on and slipped away. Each repetition adds weight, not a weight that leads to resolution.

The repetition is tied to political ends – the hope that something will be ugly enough to take down Donald Trump. He seems worried this time, but he seemed worried about E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits, lost them, and is now appealing them to the Supreme Court.

Women who were exploited and injured by Epstein and his clients, friends, have continued to press their cases. It’s been a decade or more now. If I am tired, how must they feel?

We know what Epstein did. He was almost punished for it, and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is in prison, with the growing possibility of having her sentence ended. A great many other people seem to have been involved, but they slip away. Prince-no-longer Andrew has had his titles stripped, and there has been public humiliation, if indeed he can feel humiliation.

Read More

The Alaska Summit

To use the word “negotiations” about tomorrow’s meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, if we consider its historical use for other actions between representatives of their nations, is to commit a category error.

Historically, negotiations on ending wars or treaties or trade or any of the numerous issues that must be sorted out between nations have been carried out by subject-matter specialists: nuclear scientists and engineers for arms control treaties; financial and commerce specialists for trade; and ending a war may require specialists in many areas, including the history and sociology of the nations involved, manufacturing and financial experts, and geographers.  Skillful interpreters are needed for the face to face interactions, and translators to make sure that the documents convey the same legal meanings in all languages involved.

As far as we know, Trump has employed only his golf buddy, Steve Witkoff, who knows nothing of Russian history or language, nothing of conventional or nuclear arms manufacture or capability, nothing of trade or national boundaries and the humans living within them. He may know a bit about New York real estate finance, which probably doesn’t help much with sanctions, and he’s open to whomever shows up at the table as his interpreter.

Read More

General Matter

Back when I was awarding contracts for environmental restoration, there would be some bidders who had nothing to do with environmental restoration. Their plan was to “team with” or subcontract to an organization that knew what they were doing. I never let a contract to them.

Now comes General Matter. That’s the kind of name that too-smart Silicon Valley types might condescend to a process that deals with atoms, not qbits. Uranium enrichment is one of those messy physical processes, so why not.

I first heard the name back in the spring and looked at the website, which was a placeholder only. IIRC, one page with the name and some promise that more was coming.

Read More

So Very Small

My colleague at Balloon Juice, Tom Levenson, has written another book. Tom is a popular-science writer and has written a number of books on various aspects of science – climate, Newton, Einstein are a few.

So Very Small is particularly relevant to our time. It traces the development of germ theory while also giving an account of how science develops. Tom is on Bluesky, and his comments there suggested to me that the book would be a relative of Microbe Hunters, by Paul de Kruif, a book that was formative for me.

Microbe Hunters, as I recall from decades back, is a series of vignettes about the various scientists who found particular microbes and successfully associated them with disease, sometimes finding a cure or prevention. As a child, I had no trouble imagining myself as one of the scientists: Robert Koch and anthrax, Louis Pasteur’s swan-necked flasks, those who used mercury as a harsh cure for many things, including syphilis.

Levenson uses many of the stories of Microbe Hunters in a different way. Imagine watching your children or neighbors get sick and die and not know why. There are patterns but they do not point clearly to a cause. Some commonality – dead bodies and bad odors suggest that perhaps a malign miasma wafts its way toward the unfortunate. Or they may have been weak to begin with, and something went wrong inside their bodies. Or, of course, God’s inscrutable will.

Read More

Questions on the Fordo Strike (Wonky)

I have a number of questions about the overhead photos of the bombing at Fordo. I haven’t done a detailed photo analysis like this in a long time – probably back to the photos of what turned out to be a Syrian reactor under construction in 2007. And I’m not up to date on how the MOP bombs work, so these may be dumb questions. But I haven’t seen them asked or answered.

At the very least, perhaps this analysis will help people to understand how it’s done.

A number of news outlets report that the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has assessed that the damage at Fordo was not extensive, not the obliteration that Donald Trump claims. Trump has been at odds with the intelligence agencies on a number of issues around the attack he ordered on Iran’s nuclear sites. I choose to believe the intelligence agencies over Trump’s vibes. But it is an early assessment and can change.

Read More

Fiona Hill On Trump And Nuclear Weapons

Fiona Hill was the Russia specialist on Donald Trump’s National Security Council in his first term. She’s actually a top expert on Russia. She is now chancellor of Durham University in England. She’s given a couple of interviews lately. One from a week ago in The Telegraph mentioned that she felt that Trump was afraid of nuclear weapons. Engelsberg Ideas delves into that idea in greater detail. The whole thing is worth reading.

Hill notes that Trump grew up during the Cold War, so that his attitudes toward nuclear weapons can mostly be attributed to the effect of those historical events on his thinking: the Cuban Missile Crisis, the nuclear fears of the 1980s. The Day After and Threads may have made a particular impression on a man who is heavily influenced by drama and the visual. He visits Russia for the first time in 1987.

Read More

A Very Bad Preprint With A Very Bad Idea

This is very badly done. It is hard to know where to start in critiquing it.

The author, Andy Haverly, is said to be at the Rochester Institute of Technology, although another source puts him at Mississippi State University. Haverly “doesn’t have a background in climate science or nuclear engineering,” and his current studies seem to be in computer science.

I guess anything can be published on arxiv. The basic argument of the paper is that climate change is very bad, so it’s hard to see how anything, including an 81-gigaton nuclear explosion, could be worse. There is not much more than that to the argument.

Enhanced rock weathering (ERW) has been an idea since the 1980s. I was present at what may have been the first proposal of ERW. I recognized several problems in that talk, but it was clearly a presentation of a brilliant idea by a brilliant young physicist, so I kept my mouth shut. The problems had to do with that brilliant young physicist’s misunderstanding of mineral formulas and total absence of consideration of thermodynamics. Plus the whole question of scale.

Read More

Thoughts On Russia’s Bomber Losses

The Ukrainian drone attack hit two components of the Russian nuclear force. The primary purpose of the attack was to destroy the planes that launch cruise missiles at Ukraine. Some of those planes are also the types that carry nuclear weapons. There also were hits at Severomorsk, the headquarters of the Northern Fleet and Russia’s ballistic missile submarines. We have much less information about the hits at Severomorsk, so I won’t say more about it in this post. I want to make clear that from what we know, no nuclear weapons were involved in today’s action. The primary nuclear bomber bases were not targeted.

As much as a third of Russia’s nuclear bomber fleet was destroyed. No new bombers have been produced for some time, and there are no facilities to produce them. This has serious implications for the nuclear balance between Russia and the United States.

Read More