Kamala Harris Lived in Berkeley

Berkeleyside had a long article in 2019 that they’ve reprinted about Kamala Harris’s early years in Berkeley to which I think I can add a small detail.

She lived on the south side of campus until she was about 12 years old, in an area called the Berkeley flatlands, as opposed to the hills, where wealthier and whiter people lived. The article describes the flatlands as  “an integrated community with families of various races, both middle class and poorer residents, and both renters and homeowners.” And, I would add, students. I lived in that area when I was a graduate student.

It was within easy walking distance of the campus, and the rents were reasonable. I lived in a pink house with palm trees in front, lemon trees in back around the smaller house in which the landlords lived. The pink house had been a one-family house, divided into four apartments, all occupied by graduate students.

I suspect that the couple across the hall on the ground floor were Harris’s parents. He was very tall and from the Caribbean. She was tiny. I am trying not to alter my memories too much and to recount what I actually remember, not a more expansive story of my interactions with them.

We were all graduate students, in the upper two apartments as well, and very focused on our work, as graduate students are. I don’t recall the names of any of the other renters. My husband and I would see the other couple on the ground floor when we were going in or out. We invited them to a New Year’s Eve party. A very modest party for serious graduate students.

I have seen a picture of Harris’s father holding baby Kamala while standing in front of a part of a pink house that looks like where my kitchen was. The photo at the top of the front of the pink house is mine.

The house was demolished years ago, and a park is now where it stood.

The Berkeleyside article describes some of Harris’s history in Berkeley after the time I’m describing. The whole thing is worth a read.

Cross-posted to Lawyers, Guns & Money

Foreign Policy Professionals Back Harris

In a letter today, 350 foreign policy professionals, including ambassadors and others who have served in government, back Kamala Harris for President.

Over the past three and a half years, Vice President Harris has played an integral role in restoring U.S. global leadership around the world, working closely with President Biden on our nation’s most pressing challenges. She has effectively and skillfully represented our nation on the world stage, and has been a relentless advocate for American interests, American values, and American security and prosperity. She has met with more than 150 world leaders and traveled to 21 countries as Vice President. She has been by the President’s side in the Oval Office and in the Situation Room managing high-stakes international crises and advising on the toughest decisions– from the U.S. response to Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, to the United States’ defense of Israel when Iran attacked in April 2024, to U.S. strikes against al-Qaeda leaders.

Rosa Brooks signed it, apparently giving up her game show fantasies for selecting the next presidential candidate. Also signing were former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; former National Security Advisor Thomas Donilon; Michele Flournoy, former Undersecretary of Defense and a candidate for Secretary during the last choosing; Rose Gottemoeller, former Undersecretary of State who negotiated the New START Treaty; former Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel; former CIA Director Michael Hayden; former Secretary of State John Kerry; and former Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman, who negotiated the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran.

The letter, like so much else this week, came together in 24 hours. It looks like only people above a fairly high level were asked to sign. Washington Post has the story with the letter embedded.

Cross-posted to Lawyers, Guns & Money

Project 2025 – The Department of State – Part 2

Throughout the chapter on the State Department, urgency to change the Department is repeated: all officials must be gone by the end of the day on January 20, 2025; steps to be implemented immediately, and so on. This is a large ambition. The State Department includes 13,000 Foreign Service employees and 11,000 Civil Service employees, who are the ones who would be affected, many of them fired, by the Project 2025 agenda.

Turning around an organization like this in a presidential term, never mind “by the end of the day,” is a big job requiring almost as many people as in the organization. It’s easy to send out pink slips, but then what? It’s possible that the Project 2025 agenda, to directly route presidential preferences into foreign policy, could be carried out with fewer employees. But that would also mean a very different relationship to the rest of the world.

Read More

Project 2025 – The Department of State

The Project 2025 chapter* on the State Department is a plan to transform the State Department into the President’s political arm in international affairs. Institutional knowledge would be jettisoned, most personnel would be replaced, and those remaining would be subject to political indoctrination and firing for not toeing the President’s line.

If you thought Donald Trump got a bum rap in being impeached for trying to shake down Volodymyr Zelinsky or if you’re loving his photo-ops with Viktor Orbán, you’ll love Project 2025.

Additionally, Project 2025 would end treaties or any treaty-like agreement with other countries. This has long been an ambition of the Republican Party. All such agreements would be defunded and considered for funding only if they advanced the party line or could be bent or broken in that direction.

Read More

Project 2025

Project 2025 is one of the Republican campaign’s big vulnerabilities, after Donald Trump and the operatives and elected officials who are calling for blood. Trump and even Stephen Miller now recognize this and have issued claims that they had no idea this was going on, which are not credible. Project 2025 is an enunciation of rightwing aims, directed by one of those operatives calling for blood.

The report is 900 pages, all of which none of us is likely to read, but skimming will give you the idea as some things, like the insistence that the military must end its “social engineering,” AKA DEI. Or rather, will end under our regime.

So here it is. There are a number of attempts in progress to render it into bullet points. I won’t link to or post a graphic purporting to summarize the report because it has some errors in what it claims is in the report. The report is horrible, but we should portray it accurately.

That graphic also is long, which is suboptimal for getting a message out. I think that as we condense it into bullet points, which we must and which a number of people and organizations are working on, we will have to have multiple graphics for the various sections of the report, which is organized according to the organization of government.

A work in progress. There is lots more to do.