[go: up one dir, main page]

He claims Trump would act immediately upon winning the election, before taking office. Which sounds legally dubious, but not that that’s ever stopped Trump…

  • anlumo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not seeing any reference to Trump being honest in the article.

    It’s fairly trivial for the US president to end the conflict. Stop supplying weapons to Ukraine and send them to Russia instead, and it’d be over in a week. This is something I fully believe Trump could do.

    • Manucode@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m not sure if you could call Russian occupation ‘peace’ in Ukraine

      • illi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is exactly what these people mean when they say “peace”

      • Passerby6497
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        It will give Russia another 6-10 years before they do it again just like last time.

    • Valmond
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      That would not bring peace though. Russia would just start with the next country/countries.

      • Crashumbc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Most likely, as a condition of the “peace”. Russia would promise not to invade anywhere for a few years to make Trump look good…

        • Valmond
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          So when did russia not break any promise they gave? They already promised to not invade Ukraine!

          It’s just bs.