- cross-posted to:
- aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
You must log in or # to comment.
Silicon sampling, has to be dumbest thing I’ve heard of in a while.
Its like random sampling… but cheaper, and completely made up!
it’s worse than you probably think… this is the claim the garbage company Axios hired for this:
Our simulations go beyond predicting outcomes — they shape them.
So it’s basically, tell me what you want the survey results to be
Right, like, … I can imagine how some of the sociopathic fools who tend to find themselves in executive positions could be fooled into thinking this was a sensible cost-saving measure… But anyone who’s capable of an ounce of reasoning, or who has any basic understanding of generative AI or statistics, shouldn’t need more than a few seconds to realize why this could not ever provide output that would reliably emulate a survey of actual humans.
Axios updated the story:
Editor’s note: This story has been updated to note that Aaru is an AI simulation research firm.
But still stands by their claim:
New findings by Aaru, an AI simulation research firm, for Heartland Forward show that a majority of people trust their own doctors and nurses
What kind of bullshit “fact checking” is this?
“New findings by Smegma, an Xbox chatroom research firm, show that your mother is a woman of loose morals who has had sexual intercourse with dozens of Xbox gamers.”
Pretty much this
Also, expect much more of this, if not the vast majority of opinion polls to be like this
“the idea is tantalizing”
No the fuck it isn’t, and that’s not even a Fuck AI type opinion just basic fucking scientific principles
Lying, cheating, stealing, exploitation and propaganda all sound “tantalizing” when you’re a criminally corrupt sociopath.
We’re just lucky capitalism doesn’t reward sociopaths with wealth and power /s
Okay, that means that per immediately I’ll never trust axios as a source again
In relayed news, a recent study that concluded I am, not just the smartest person in the universe but also the smartest that has every been or will ever be.
You’re absolutely right!
✅ Here’s why it matters:
I recently did a AI study that concluded that I am not only the cutest catgirl on lemmy but deserve free unlimited hrt :3
Well, a broken clock is right twice a day.
Your typos and use of commas betrays you, fake study
Fake news!
ALL HAIL DONALD TRUMP
Yes, but how much of the training data is synthetic data? Because I expect this startup has no idea. Microsoft uses ML to crawl files on OneDrive to build aggregate models of document types, then use that for LLM training.
It’s just all slop all the way down, huh? Just a fuzzy picture of a fuzzy picture hit with the “sharpen” filter 20 times?
It’s ironic that the survey companies, who I thought wanted to avoid noise and bullshit, would pay for noise and bullshit that any RNG could fill.
I instantly thought “fuck no, this can’t be true”, then read the AI part.
Alt text.
A recent Axios story on maternal health policy referenced “findings” that a majority of people trusted their doctors and nurses. On the surface, there’s nothing unusual about that. What wasn’t originally mentioned, however, was that these findings were made up.
Clicking through the links revealed (as did a subsequent editor’s note and clarification by Axios) that the public opinion poll was a computer simulation run by the artificial intelligence start-up Aaru. No people were involved in the creation of these opinions.
The practice Aaru used is called silicon sampling, and it’s suddenly everywhere. The idea behind silicon sampling is simple and tantalizing. Because large language models can generate responses that emulate human answers, polling companies see an opportunity to use A.I. agents to simulate survey responses at a small fraction of the cost and time required for traditional polling.
They were so busy thinking about the fact that they could that they didn’t stop to think if they should. How much of an idiot can you be?
I dont know the Axis was ever the most trustworthy source out there but if they’re doing this then less trustworthy sources are also doing it.
wtf…
Wasnt it axios that had that controversy recently where some github admin ended up in a flame war with an ai, and axios made up quotes?
Or was that someone else?
That was Ars Technica.
Wtf
What an interesting but absolutely horrible idea.
I’m still convinced axios made up the “truck owners don’t use their shit right” back in 2018 and it caused 75% of the internet hate for trucks. To this day after asking repeatedly I still have not found a single lock of evidence outside one of their hit pieces.
Most people never use the hauling capabilities and use their trucks as a worse car
Cite one source. I bet when you Google whatever random website to support your already made view it leads back to nowhere or axios.
I see very little hauling, TONS of trucks in the city, and trucks parked at people’s office job. It’s kind of painfully obvious.
I thought today was the day somebody might have an ounce of data instead of regurgitating retarded observations with biases and not a metric in sight. Not today I guess.