very cool!!

they did worse than nothing… same day they elected another of trump’s boot licker to congress to replace MTG

lol throwing the christian mea culpa just makes it worse… I guess if your president can be a child rapist and traficker, this garbage school board member has nothing to fear

I think part of my issue is the terminal doesn’t always provide feedback, so some of the commands idk if they worked

I hear you… the rule of thumb here is that you only get feedback when:

• you requested it in the command issued

• there is an error in the execution of the command

Other than that, if you just got the prompt back, it meant the command did what it was supposed to and had no errors. It was hard to get used to that hahahaha

WOW… not a fan of floor crossers but this speaks volumnes about how TERRIBLE PP’s leadership is

Maybe you fuck off… just yesterday Georgia elected a trump finger man to replace MTG

You idiots keep voting republitard no matter what happens to you or the world!

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2026/04/07/republicans-win-mtgs-georgia-seat/89490575007/

Thank you!.. it did taste nice and was soft and fluffy inside while a touch crusty on the outside.

The only drawback I can see is that I did get a good raise but not the big holes you see in many pro baked Focaccias

No, the actual claims here, that describe specific bugs in specific software, can be evaluated. Even without whipping out a test environment to try to reproduce the results with your own proof of concept, you can read the text and evaluate whether the claims make sense on their face.

Again, why would I bother? I do not work for Anthropic nor any of the other open source projects they are claiming to help so I have not stake in this fight. I am content to ignore whatever wins anthropic claims and wait until those open source projects, whom I do trust more, let me know if these claims are real or not.

I don’t give a shit about AI and I’m generally a skeptic of the future of any of these AI companies. But if someone uses AI tools to discover something new in the subjects that I do care about, like cybersecurity, then I’ll pay attention to the results and what they publish in that field.

Ok, you do you bud… I am happy ignoring Ai until they are proven by third parties… not sure what’s so challenging with that notion

Not a meme for those interested…

This piece of shit of a human actually complained about being fact checked

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipxF918BjWQ

The statements can stand for themselves, evaluated on the merits of the claims, regardless of authorship.

Sure but where is the practicality of that? According to your POV here, companies can claim whatever and it’s my job now to figure out if they are lying or to what extent. I have already lived through that and decided their output is completely untrustworthy so I rather wait for a trustworthy source before giving them any credit. I am not claiming 100% of what Anthropic says is a complete lie, I am saying I cannot trust it at face value.

On the flip side, the corollary to the adage that a broken clock is still right twice a day is that you can’t just say “oh the broken clock said this so I can ignore it.”

Funny you use this saying because a broken clock is never right, reality momentarily aligns with it, which is a completely different thing… and even then, for every minute of the day, a clock is still wrong 1438 times a day… I would rather not use suck broken clock as a reference AT ALL

The blog post literally describes exactly that, for ffmpeg. And several of the other described vulnerabilities sound like they’re in that category of “here’s a bug but we didn’t find an exploit.”

Case in point, they do not claim that in the title or intro. Their entire intro (in the blog you posted) is all about how amazing Mythos is

…who cares?

People like me who rather not keep feeding the Ai hype. Assuming these vulnerabilities are real and could have been exploited, yes I am happy they get fixed. But I am never giving credit to “Ai” unless it is an absolute certainty Ai did it and did it better than humans would

I get your point and yes, I was exaggerating for effect but… are there a million places to use Ai where you can blindly trust its output/work?

I do not really think it’s completely useless; however, I do think the uses are very very limited (compared to the hype) and the cost of running these models for the benefit they provide makes them even less practical

LOL Kuusi Palaa!

I had no idea hahahahaha

Time to learn Finnish it seems ahhahaha

Thanks for the link, refreshing to see actual logic and plain discourse in display

Well I do not know where you are from but your journalists seem to have stayed professionals!

Yes I understand, but I’m also putting the direct claims right there, not filtered through Anthropic’s PR or an article from the IT industry press interpreting those PR statements.

How do you know Antropic’s PR is not in this? certainly all these employees have signed NDAs about inner workings of the company they work for. Do you really think any of them would post something like “yeah, we found a vulnerability but it’s basically a typo that could not be seriously exploited”?

These are real CVEs…

Regarding this… I just saw another post where people were challenging ffmpeg about accepting PRs from Anthropic and their answer was that the PR were written by humans, not any of the Anthropic Ai, so even if the whole scenario is real, it may not have the intervention of Ai they are claiming

… And treating it as just marketing fluff ignores the shades of gray that actually apply to corporate claims.

This is really a corporate problem of their own making and their responsibility to fix. They have lied so much, I do not owe then a single iota of trust.

If they want to be trusted, they should be truthful. It’s really that simple

All they can do is say “this is what the two liars are saying, we don’t know what will happen”

Not really… that is exactly what I meant about the capitulation of journalism. Sure they can say something like “Trump claims the sky is green; however, multiple observations, expert testimony and reality immediately confirms this claim to be false”… instead, they just quote the lie and move on.

I get that they cannot really confirm everything, but they are not even trying anymore. There is no questioning, there is no challenge… they just echo what is posted on Tweets or whatever other garbage platform and call themselves journalists

At the VERY LEAST, they should always add the disclaimer that no evidence was provided whenever parroting a known liar

… again!

That is a huge issue today… American state media and Iran state media are basically guaranteed to be lying.

If you add the complete capitulation of journalism in general, there is not a single source of information that can actually be trusted.

I guess we MAY see what actually happened based on what reality displays

From the blog’s site:

About the blog

Welcome to red.anthropic.com, the home for research from Anthropic’s Frontier Red Team (and occasionally other teams at Anthropic) on what frontier AI models mean for national security. We provide evidence-based analysis about AI’s implications for cybersecurity, biosecurity, and autonomous systems.

This is Anthropic paid people, peddling Anthropic successes…

Correct.

There may have been a time where advertising was honest but nowadays, the Help Desk rule applies “never believe a customer unless they are confessing”.

If a company is making a claim that benefits them, you cannot believe it without independent, third party corroboration. If they are confessing to wrong doing, you should assume it’s 10x worse than what they are stating.