Jack suffering from chronic sleep disorders and boredom gets to know the charismatic soap seller Tyler Durden. This encounter radically changes his life, because Tyler believes that only self-destruction makes life truly worth living. After a drinking tour, the two begin to beat up for fun and experience the ultimate kick. The “Fight Club” is born and quickly finds followers all over America hitting in secret circles to experience the joys of physical violence. Overwhelmed, Jack gets deeper and deeper into the fascinating pull of anarchy. But soon Tyler’s terrorist plans threaten to get out of control. Jack tries to stop him and is confronted with the shocking truth…
Special Features and Technical Specs:
- NEW 4K MASTER APPROVED BY DAVID FINCHER
- DOLBY VISION/HDR PRESENTATION OF THE FILM
- Commentary by Director David Fincher
- Commentary by David Fincher, Brad Pitt, Edward Norton & Helena Bonham Carter
- Writers’ Commentary by Chuck Palahniuk and Jim Uhls
- Technical Commentary by Alex McDowell, Jeff Cronenweth, Michael Kaplan & Kevin Haug
- A Hit in the Ear: Ren Klyce and the Sound Design of Fight Club
- Flogging Fight Club Featurette
- Insomniac Mode: I Am Jack’s Search Index
- Work Behind-the-Scenes Vignettes with Multiple Angles and Commentary
- Deleted and Alternate Scenes
- Publicity Material Trailers, TV and Internet Spots
- PSAs
- Music Video
- Promotional Galleries
- Art Galleries
- Optional English SDH, Spanish and French subtitles for the main feature
Pre-orders are not live yet.
Since when does the narrator have a name?
He was referred to as “Jack” in the screenplay, and throughout the film he refers to himself as Jack (ex. “I am Jack’s complete lack of surprise.”).
I really wouldn’t characterise that as referring to himself as Jack. He’s referencing articles that use that format, not saying that his name is Jack.
You mean it’s not Barabbas?
I’ve seen some regions give him a name which makes the film worse. I loved the reveal that at no point had we actually learned his name.
Well a modern movie actually having a narrator kinda gives it away. Especially when they’re recounting the tale of some nobody.
Sorry, I don’t follow.
I’m saying that the format of a film generally doesn’t need a narrator. Typically what is told by a narrator is just actually seen on screen, shown in flashbacks or whatever. The framing story of Fight Club doesn’t need a narrator, nor are they defined as any third party in-universe like a detective making sense of it.
So that the narrator remains in a movie where they aren’t apparently part of the plot already spoils us that there’s some reason we are not told for which we have a narrator. From there the simple mystery rapidly unravels.
Lots of things have a narrator when one isn’t necessary, that’s not all that weird for a film and doesn’t tell the audience much.
nor are they defined as any third party in-universe like a detective making sense of it.
I don’t think that comparison works here. Most of the film is a flashback, described by the narrator. He doesn’t give his name as he tells us what led up to the prologue but that doesn’t seem all that odd, it doesn’t seem pertinent. Marla asks what his name is but the scene ends without us finding out - it’s relevant information to her but we have no particular reason to care whether his name is Dave Smith or Lance Elbowbottom III. It’s only later, with the reveal, that it becomes interesting. The credits might as well call him “also Tyler Durden” but “narrator” works well enough.
Looking forward to torrenting this
I’ve never seen the film. Is it good?
Both movie and book are good. It is a great watch but not popcorn cinema. Put your phone away and listen closely. I should rewatch it too.
Put your phone away and listen closely
I always do. I can’t stand people on their phone during a movie.
I initially judged it by just the title and thought it was some action flick. It is not; it’s much better. Would indeed recommend, and please go in blind!
One of the best