Yes, he has the credentials and the thought pattern of a champion of American imperialism.

Those are the options. If war crimes have been committed by now trials are the only path to justice. Therefore he either believes no war crimes have been committed, or he is a defender of injustice and American exceptionalism.

Well there was a minor oversight where most got away scot-free anyway, and if you didn’t lose you weren’t accused.

Would hate to see justice done? Or does he imply US forces have done nothing wrong so far?

Well then your argument is that you’re just a supremacist who wants to keep his inherently superior culture on top by unorganically indoctrinating people.

Generally not believing in human rights comes as a package deal.

Perhaps, though schooling is often struggles to promote solutions that are not efficiency first. In fact as far as I’ve experienced colleges and universities often benchmark the courseload so most will resort to shortcuts that save time and reduce learning.

Of course there are always those who take the path of least resistance, but outside actual prodigies schooling is designed for priorization for those with higher aspirations too.

Not a valueless skill of course, but I’ve often wondered if the courses tight scheduling squeezes in manage to compensate for shoddier fundamentals of the trade and more knowing things to be tested.

They will say “No Kings” and issue blanket pardons to the guilty.

My parents often just start shouting at 6:30 AM because they don’t care.

Yeah, though that’s about 4/5 of the actual people I’ve met working in psychology.

deleted by creator

At least you can ask your nephew for a source. LLMs nowadays obfuscate their plagiarism quite well. Not like early ones where with any sufficiently advanced topic they started quoting the few scientific sources in their training data near directly.

Well the point is to try and badger the innocent citizen to doing something actionable. They were still going for the arrest but a reason would have been a nice bonus.

Well the specifics in other religions are a little different but all have a part about pushing your moral responsibility and development on something else. You are never at fault, or are always at fault so it doesn’t matter. And even if it doesn’t matter you apply scripture so facing legal punishment is unnecessary.

Religion is for people of no morals or intelligence to supplant both.

A constitutional ethnostate being bigoted?!

The point of religion is to place yourself above societal ethics with an excuse not to feel bad about failing to match them since your deity loves child molesters or however anyway.

Indeed, if some indescribable lifeforce without identity goes for another round, as I am concerned the original would be well and truly dead anyway.

Thanks, but my parents aren’t stupid enough to be so delusional.

And you know, those people are few even as states pour untold billions of subsidies to try and rescue naturally waning industries, subsidize sports in the pursuit of patriotic legacies, while the teams are owned by oligarchs who launder their money with untold billions in bogus art evaluations.

Sir, phrenology