More like there are so many things I need to do yet I am not doing any of them

(I’ve only read the title. If turns out I am terribly mistaken I will come back and correct myself). More like scientists commit academic fraud and fooled a bunch of people. How did this get through the ethics board? Why would any publisher play along with this?

Edit: so the bluesky post wasn’t accurate. The fake papers were never published, they were pre-prints, and were written to be obviously fake if you paid any attention to read it. LLM didn’t have the ability to tell, some researchers took LLM’s output and didn’t check the source material.

Don’t know what to say. Also kinda ironic this bluesky user apparently didn’t know the difference between a preprint and a published paper either.

Are drug dogs exempt from ACAB

btw, i just learned recently pyramids weren’t built by slaves.

i meant jar. brain fart.

Sorry to inform you but the drip council has reviewed your submission, and unfortunately the answer is no, you don’t.

Well yeah but it is your choice whether to follow that desire. Like I really want to empty a bottle of Nutella into my mouth, but I am not actually going to do it.

deleted by creator

main stream medias are finally catching on i see

How’s he going to do that? Just more bullshit from the deranged imbecile. Just a clown clowning around.

ah i think you are right. it’s obscured by the front leg so i didn’t see it.

How does plumbing work for this house?

lmao I am totally lost with this one. no idea how they got from this to that.

Man, who doesn’t

Yes it’s more than double.

well, government regulations. one can dream…

Looks like FT to me. Also there are citations in the fine prints.

Well, everything in one place doesn’t really require a monopoly. The key is interoperability. It would be having a single launcher that can download games from any store. This way the customer can have choice over where to buy games and what launcher to use. It’d something similar to the heroic launcher.

You are right. Google is a monopoly, and they are at the same time anti-competitive. Valve hasn’t done anything anti-competitive yet (that I know of, anyways), but they are a monopoly.

I feel people strongly associate being anti-competitive with being a monopoly, which is fair, not many monopolies out there that are not anti-competitive. But there is a distinction.

I mean we say Google has a monopoly on search, but there are bing, duckduckgo, kagi, etc. You are thinking absolute monopoly.