IMDb RATING
5.9/10
1.6K
YOUR RATING
An American family moves into Canterville Chase, a stately countryside mansion that has been haunted by the ghost of Sir Simon De Canterville for 300 years.An American family moves into Canterville Chase, a stately countryside mansion that has been haunted by the ghost of Sir Simon De Canterville for 300 years.An American family moves into Canterville Chase, a stately countryside mansion that has been haunted by the ghost of Sir Simon De Canterville for 300 years.
Hugh Laurie
- Mephisto Monster
- (voice)
- …
Emily Carey
- Virginia Otis
- (voice)
Imelda Staunton
- Mrs. Umney
- (voice)
Meera Syal
- Lucretia Otis
- (voice)
David Harewood
- Hiram Otis
- (voice)
Jakey Schiff
- Louis Otis
- (voice)
Bennett Miller
- Kent Otis
- (voice)
Bill Lobley
- Lord Monroe
- (voice)
Keiron Self
- Professor Borsakov
- (voice)
- …
Giles New
- The Colonel
- (voice)
- …
Lynne Seymour
- Mrs. Borsakov
- (voice)
- …
Georgia Small
- Marjorie Fairfax
- (voice)
- …
Featured reviews
I see a lot of criticism of the animation here. Apparently, I am not so jaded that I cannot enjoy something animated that looks... oh, I don't know... animated? Obviously, the others are so spoiled by "modern" tech that they demand their animation more akin to computer generated AI, completely indistinguishable from reality. That's fine... as for me and mine, we enjoyed this. And trust me, I have seen some really bad computer animation. We thought this was really well done.
I honestly would have given this a higher rating, were it not for the "modern day" re-imagining. I've never read the original, but after looking at some Cliff's Notes, my suspicions were confirmed. Virginia was not the strong-independent-don't-need-no-man heroine she is depicted as here. Not that I really needed to research that to know it. Wilde, nor anyone from his time period would have written this in this "modern" way.
Having said that, were there no other source material to which it could be compared, I would be more than willing to give this an 8. It really was good. It was funny. It was entertaining. It was, aside from the re-imagining of the main heroine, lacking the standard PC elements. Well... aside from the fact that the Duke is a bumbling idiot. But that has been standard fare for decades, so...
Look, if you are looking for something that the entire family can enjoy without being beat of the head with modern day writing, you should give this a watch.
I honestly would have given this a higher rating, were it not for the "modern day" re-imagining. I've never read the original, but after looking at some Cliff's Notes, my suspicions were confirmed. Virginia was not the strong-independent-don't-need-no-man heroine she is depicted as here. Not that I really needed to research that to know it. Wilde, nor anyone from his time period would have written this in this "modern" way.
Having said that, were there no other source material to which it could be compared, I would be more than willing to give this an 8. It really was good. It was funny. It was entertaining. It was, aside from the re-imagining of the main heroine, lacking the standard PC elements. Well... aside from the fact that the Duke is a bumbling idiot. But that has been standard fare for decades, so...
Look, if you are looking for something that the entire family can enjoy without being beat of the head with modern day writing, you should give this a watch.
This Oscar Wilde story has been filmed a dozen times, but as far as I know this is the first time it is presented as a CGI film. The CGI is not the very best we've seen, but it is more than watchable.
An American family move into an old stately home to find it is haunted by the ghost of it's former owner. Only the teen daughter of the family, Virginia, strikes up a friendship with the ghost, Sir Simon de Canterville, and together they plot how he can be laid to rest finally. I can't imagine this film scaring many kids so it is perfect for a family watch. It may even serve to make smaller kids less afraid of ghosts as Sir Simon is an utterly nice fellow.
The pace is spot on, the story is good, the voice acting is very good from everyone, and the CGI is enough to satisfy the vast majority of people.
All in all a very healthy and fun film for all ages. I give it a solid 6.
An American family move into an old stately home to find it is haunted by the ghost of it's former owner. Only the teen daughter of the family, Virginia, strikes up a friendship with the ghost, Sir Simon de Canterville, and together they plot how he can be laid to rest finally. I can't imagine this film scaring many kids so it is perfect for a family watch. It may even serve to make smaller kids less afraid of ghosts as Sir Simon is an utterly nice fellow.
The pace is spot on, the story is good, the voice acting is very good from everyone, and the CGI is enough to satisfy the vast majority of people.
All in all a very healthy and fun film for all ages. I give it a solid 6.
Man, it was such a Magnificent Film, from Start to Finish.
Granted, the Source Material is of Oscar Wilde.
But you still have to Execute.
Elements -
1. Again the Filmmakers already have the Upper Hand with Such Material as this Particular Oscar Wilde Story but the Effective Execution was also There.
2. The Dialogue was Excellent, Forwarding the Plotline Consistently. A Few Good Quips too. "Somehow Cucumber Sandwiches are a Thing, But I don't know why" - or something along those lines, It was Funny to me.
3. The Animation Style, I love this Style. It's Nothing Out of this World, but it had this Charm that Suited this Particular Story.
4. Virginia Otis is Great, she has the Charisma to Lead this thing. Canterville was Ok. And the Rest of the Supporting Cast were Good too.
5. It Hits the Emotional Beats Well.
Overall, Excellent Narrative Storytelling, Great Dialogue, Emotional Beats, it was just a Delightful Watch.
Granted, the Source Material is of Oscar Wilde.
But you still have to Execute.
Elements -
1. Again the Filmmakers already have the Upper Hand with Such Material as this Particular Oscar Wilde Story but the Effective Execution was also There.
2. The Dialogue was Excellent, Forwarding the Plotline Consistently. A Few Good Quips too. "Somehow Cucumber Sandwiches are a Thing, But I don't know why" - or something along those lines, It was Funny to me.
3. The Animation Style, I love this Style. It's Nothing Out of this World, but it had this Charm that Suited this Particular Story.
4. Virginia Otis is Great, she has the Charisma to Lead this thing. Canterville was Ok. And the Rest of the Supporting Cast were Good too.
5. It Hits the Emotional Beats Well.
Overall, Excellent Narrative Storytelling, Great Dialogue, Emotional Beats, it was just a Delightful Watch.
The animation evokes the aesthetics of early 2000s video games, but not in a way that adds nostalgic value. Rather, it appears as if constrained by the same limitations that plagued those older games-resulting in choppy and disjointed visuals. A reviewer's perfect 10 out of 10 score for the film raises further concerns. This suspicion is heightened by the fact that the review was published a month before the film's official release. Such an anomalously high rating strongly suggests a self-serving agenda, likely from someone affiliated with the production team. Despite a compelling story, the film ultimately fails to deliver a visual experience that matches the quality of its narrative.
1. There's nothing interesting about the choppy animation, in fact it's worse than 2000's animation movies somehow, wich makes this kinda boring to watch.
2. The plotline in most cases is completely unrealistic, making this movie even more unwatchable.
3. The scenes that try to make you laugh, cry or make you feel anything else fail miserably, with the dialogues being exaggerated, bland,or useless, 90% of the sounds effect in the movie just being:"huh?""woah" or any kind of overused interjections.
4. The characters dont have a lot of developement, making them very boring and uninteresting.
5. Why is half the cast morbidly obese?? Seriously,barely anyone was obese in the 20th century.
Overall this movie wasn't funny, interesting or scary at all, and i don't even know what it's supposed to be.
2. The plotline in most cases is completely unrealistic, making this movie even more unwatchable.
3. The scenes that try to make you laugh, cry or make you feel anything else fail miserably, with the dialogues being exaggerated, bland,or useless, 90% of the sounds effect in the movie just being:"huh?""woah" or any kind of overused interjections.
4. The characters dont have a lot of developement, making them very boring and uninteresting.
5. Why is half the cast morbidly obese?? Seriously,barely anyone was obese in the 20th century.
Overall this movie wasn't funny, interesting or scary at all, and i don't even know what it's supposed to be.
Did you know
- TriviaStephen Fry (Sir Simon de Canterville) previously played Oscar Wilde, the author of the short story on which the film is based, in Oscar Wilde (1997).
- GoofsIt's clear from his gravestone that Sir Simon lived and died during the seventeenth century. His ghost, however, is dressed in sixteenth century style.
- Quotes
[repeated line]
Louis Otis, Kent Otis: [pointing to each other] It Was Him
- Crazy creditsAfter the credits there is a sound of something breaking followed by the Otis Twins blaming the ghost until it's pointed out their home is no longer haunted leading them to blame each other
- ConnectionsFeatured in The 7PM Project: Episode dated 12 January 2024 (2024)
- How long is The Canterville Ghost?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- The Canterville Ghost
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $192,310
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $150,041
- Oct 22, 2023
- Gross worldwide
- $3,874,170
- Runtime
- 1h 29m(89 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content