K-11

There will be people hating on this film because of various reasons, but I loved the story, even though it could have been much much better, I'd say this is rather rushed, but I wouldn't say it's bad. This homosexual prison camp never came across my mind, at least it doesn't seem to exist in my country.

I looked up Doubleday's filmography and found this movie, at first I wasn't expecting much from her but I must say her role as Butterfly is really really fabulous, same for Visnjic, although I think he'd have done better with his emotions.

If you have spare time, it wouldn't hurt to check this out as it is a rather different experience with other films.

The only way I can safely describe this movie is: Very peculiar.

Is it that the film is depicting the brutality, inhumanity, homophobia, and transphobia of a horrifically and inherently corrupt system, and the power struggles therein? Or is it that the film is itself homophobic and transphobic in how it depicts this specific dormitory, and portrays and refers to those within? The lack of trans and otherwise queer representation in the casting, and indifference to pronouns in the dialogue, don't help to assuage the latter concern. That the narrative is in no small part a story of self-empowerment, and asserting oneself in circumstances where that power has been ripped away, does.

Is it that filmmaker Jules Stewart is incapable, or possibly her cast, resulting in somewhat leaden, passive pacing and an unbothered air? Or is it that the setting and course of events so thoroughly strips its characters of emotion and humanity that any expression thereof, or heightened drama generally, feels overwrought just by comparison? It's a delicate balance being struck here, and I'm unsure if the end result is somehow "just right," or "endlessly teetering on the edge."

Excise the particulars (setting, characters) and recognizable names and faces, and 'K-11' is one prison drama among many. It's not bad, and in light of the course of events that unfolds, ultimately I think it's kind of good. In fact, I'd like to say I like it even more than I do. It's just that the movie's handling of the subject matter struggles to not seem as problematic as the institution at the heart of the feature. Moreover, for most of the length, the lead character Raymond Saxx feels less like a protagonist and more like a bystander, and the content similarly feels less like a plot and more like a detached portrait of "life in the Big House." When within the last third Saxx experiences a turn-around, and thus the narrative as well, it feels a bit unnatural, and even contrived. The picture gradually gathers all its parts and gels into a cohesive, modestly compelling whole, but for perhaps half the runtime the most dominant element is the question of whether the bigotry is only on the inside radiating out, or if it's also on the outside dripping in.

The cast is restricted by writing and direction that consciously hamstrings their contributions in much the same way as the setting constrains its characters. All the same, I think the assembled actors are pretty swell in realizing their characters with emphatic range, personality, and physicality. That especially goes for Kate del Castillo as charismatic Mousey, and Portia Doubleday as troubled Butterfly - though, again, I'm taken aback by the fact that a picture centering LGBTQ+ characters didn't seem especially concerned about centering LGBTQ+ performers. And I should say, too: I keep hammering a little bit on Stewart, but I don't think there's any one thing wrong with her work in 'K-11.' Only, I've already spoken to everything that seems off about the film, and to whatever extent this construction is intentional versus accidental, the finished product just isn't as successful and convincing as it ideally should or could be. A strong effort, incompletely rendered.

I think the contributions of those behind the scenes are just fine - costume design, hair and makeup, editing, blood, set decoration, and so on. 'K-11' is well made from a technical standpoint, and mildly engaging at large. Nonetheless, there are issues here that never feel entirely resolved for me, and despite the work all put in, the dubiousness that pervades the title from one angle or another just holds it down from climbing any higher. Content warnings are necessary for the indicated homophobia and transphobia, as well as violence and drug use, but overall I do think this is a feature reasonably deserving of one's time should you come across it. But don't go out of your way for it, and just keep in mind that in one fashion or another, 'K-11' has caveats attached.

I heard about this film and looked it up. The premise seemed fascinating and the first thing that came to mind is "I must watch this". Anticipating, from the visuals and advertising, this film would be a trippy ride through prison lane. Unfortunately as soon as I started watching, I got the sense of a very sanitized film with actors who I am sure had lots of terms and conditions imposed on the filmmakers prior to diving into making the film. In one word, the film just does not seem authentic. A simple a word as that maybe, it is the lifeblood of films of this type. If you are going to go through the troubles of doing a prison drama, get in there and get your feet wet. The actors skimped on all situations. Not sure if the script was written like that or what happened between the production and final cut. Whatever may have happened in the process, it is obvious many things got chopped and with them the fear and tension that this sort of situation brings about for any straight attorney who would have been wrongly classified in a prison system. The girl that the attorney meets at the beginning is so obviously female, she was miscast in the first place. Nowhere did her performance remotely resemble that of someone who may have been previously male. If you are going to do something like this.. go all the way. Get the real thing. You would never see obviously real women in a K-11 section and that is what spoiled it for me. Sometimes playing it safe can inhibit your film from all of the wonderful possibilities that could have been effective if more time and effort was placed in finding actors who could accurately portray a grim situation successfully in a rather dark place. My suspension of disbelieve got interrupted several times and at every attempt I made to try to immerse myself in the reality of what should have been a very dark, disturbing, spine tingling situation for the viewer. In other words I expected something around the realm of "OZ" the very successful cable series that did exemplify the tensions and fears that prison life entail. Sad to say, I felt instead of OZ I got something along the lines of "the wizard of OZ" version sprinkled with mild to light tension. Unfortunately, this was a missed opportunity.

I will write a review but what we have here is an amazingly American "pile on" by the press. What I realize after having seen K-11 is that virtually none of the critics who gave this film zero stars even saw it. If you see the term "CAMP" or "EXPLOITATION" or here them claiming "it couldn't decide what it was" you know that those critic's wrote a review on the trailer and not the film. This film has one problem only to them , Jules Stewart is Kristen Stewart's Mom . They cant get to Kristen so they attack Jules. They attack her even after Kristen was intentionally NOT cast in K-11 http://gawker.com/5990662/kristen-stewarts-mom-wanted- her-to-play-a-character-thats-raped-repeatedly. Interviewers will start asking about the film and then turn to Kristen , helpless in their own lack of imagination and drawn finally to a personality that blinds them to everything around them. Years from now when Kristen is no longer a young star people will re-examine this film. Kristen is not even in this film , intentionally. The press lie, that is what they do.

K-11 is a straight film, not exploitation or camp. Portia Doubleday ,Goran Visnjic , DB Sweeny and most of all, Kate del Castillo, are brilliant. So what has the critics babbling ? They can't put it in a box. They use the term "its like " because they need something to compare it to. Its a great little film that you should compare to every great directors first films because it is vastly superior to Canmeron's "Piranha Part Two: The Spawning" ! Its an incredibly good first film. Making a film of this kind for a first time director is virtually impossible because everyone "knows better". Jules stuck to her guns, finally taking the film back from her first editor and recutting it to the original script. The films most memorable quote "Bad things happen to bad people" . If that were true a few critics here would spontaneously burst into flame. This is a great little film that stands on its own and the cast and crew did a terrific job.