Riding the Bus with My Sister

Beth Simon (Rosie O'Donnell) is an intellectually disabled woman who doesn't have a job and through government assistance lives on a diet of high sugar high carb foods and spends most of the day riding around on the city bus lines. After Beth's father dies, Beth's estranged sister Rachel (Andie MacDowell) takes a leave of absence from her job as a fashion photographer and stays with Beth for three months to make sure Beth is able to support herself. The two initially have friction regarding Beth's unhealthy life choices and lack of direction, but as Rachel observes Beth's daily routine she learns how integral she is viewed by many of the bus drivers and passengers.

Riding the Bus with My Sister is a 2005 made-for-TV movie based upon Rachel Simon's 2002 memoir of the same name that chronicled a year of Rachel's life following her mentally challenged sister Beth around in the course of her life a major part of which included riding the buses in their Pennsylvania city home. The options to the story were eventually acquired by Hallmark and CBS where it was released as a TV movie with Rosie O'Donnell staring in and executive producing the project. Upon release the film was a success in the ratings garnering 15 million in total viewership while critical reception tended to pan the film with many lamenting the film's cloying sentimentality and central performance by O'Donnell. However well intentioned Riding the Bus with My Sister might've been, those intentions are lost in the very hackneyed and obnoxious way in which this story is told.

As the film begins with Beth and Rachel's morning routines cross-cut with each other in the opening credits sequence, there's a clear sense that something has gone horribly wrong in the translation from book to film as Beth condition is presented with a level of over the top whimsy that coupled with O'Donnell's delivery (that many have compared to Pee-Wee Herman including the laugh) feels less like a respectful depiction of someone with a developmental disability and more like a grotesque caricature. While I haven't read the book, I have been made aware of several exaggerations and alterations the producers made such as exaggerating Beth's condition, changing Rachel from a college teacher to a fashion photographer, and killing off Beth and Rachel's father as an inciting incident (with him actually still being alive when the movie aired). With the way the film is made and acted you get the sense the producers homogenized this story to the point all the substance was lost and instead of engaging their audience's minds they simply aim broad shots at the heartstrings using an arsenal of broad archetypes which given it's CBS/Hallmark and it scored 15 million viewers shows you'll never go broke catering to the lowest common denominator.

Riding the Bus with My Sister might have had some better aspirations at some point, but rather than actually giving us a chance to learn and understand these characters we're instead treated to a depiction of the "Magic Simpleton" trope with dialed up obnoxiousness and sentimentality that aims for heartwarming and instead becomes cloying.

I did not like the movie because it did not have much of an ending. And because there was no real resolution between Beth and Rachel. Rachel went back to new york and got on with her life while Beth stayed where she was and her life remained the same. It would have been a better ending if Beth and Jesse moved in with each other and lived together. And if Rachel would have done something to help her sister to have a real life. Some of the people on the bus were right in a way. Beth should have got a life. There likely something she could have done as an occupation. She needed to learn if possible when to keep quiet and not say certain things. There is a lot she needed to learn and the system was not helping her learn. She had a case worker. But no indication she was helping her get a life.

Rosie O'Donnell can act. She was great as the wiseacre in A League of Their Own and passable in a similar role in the sequel to Stakeout. Since I'm being generous, her talk show was even entertaining at times, if you go in for that celebrity-fawning type of thing. But this performance is so embarrassingly awful you might question whether she is indeed acting or if she has been struck with what her character suffers from. How else to explain her choices? Mismatched pastel Chuck Taylors with a Tweety Bird T-shirt? A voice somewhere between Pee-wee Herman and Yoda, but without the likability? If Rosie really wanted to do something for the mentally challenged, she would have stuck to executive producing and hired an actual mentally challenged actor. It's not like they could do any worse. From the Forrest Gump pose on a bench on the DVD cover to the Rainmanesque quips, she seems to be changing her characterization every scene. And let's not forget who directed? John Huston's very own daughter. I mean Anjelica Huston must have watched her dad's films. She was practically married to Jack Nicholson so she must have watched his films. Do you not think just a little bit of that talent might have rubbed off on her? This is clearly ego run amok. High-profile celebrities trying "to make a difference" but just demonstrating how woefully out-of-touch they are.

Anjelica Huston has given enough good acting performances and directed at least one very good film (Bastard out of Carolina), that she can perhaps be forgiven for this. But there is no forgiving Rosie and Andie, who give two of the most godawful performances ever put on film. You'd think Rosie would win the bad acting competition hands-down, since she has the over-the-top, tug-at-your-heartstrings role and plays it with such zero-talent gusto; but, if possible, Andie is worse in that expressionless, monotone, "but she's pretty" way that somehow keeps getting her cast in movies. Unintentional laughs throughout...a real pleasure if you throw out all expectations and just revel in the awfulness.

I found myself torn when I was choosing a rating for this film. Of course, the easy choice (the one I went with) is to give it a 1. It is, after all, an awful, awful, awful movie. However, if you view it in the proper mindset, you may not have a better two hours watching a movie than you will watching Riding the Bus with My Sister.

First, let me explain that it's not a garden variety "let's make fun of people that are different than us" type of enjoyment. In fact, that shouldn't really be enjoyable unless you are in a room of people who know you are kidding. If you TRULY derive joy from making fun of people who are different from you, then you might want to change a few things about yourself. What makes this movie fun is that you are making fun of two HORRIBLE actors delivering two HORRIBLE performances.

Now, to expect brilliance from either Rosie O'Donnell or Andie McDowell is probably akin to Sisyphus' struggle--you're going to be disappointed repeatedly when you don't find brilliance. This film might just be the best example that Andie McDowell's best acting was in make-up commercials and Rosie O'Donnell's best acting is done with the TV on mute.

I'll start with Rosie. I believe I read somewhere that her performance sounded like an Asian comedian doing a horrible impression of a combination of Pee Wee Herman and Adam Sandler. That's pretty close, only without comedic intent that such an impression would carry with it. What makes her performance laughable is the thought that I had while watching it--she is probably proud of this performance. There is literally only one line she delivers that is NOT delivered in the same manner as all the others. Most are given with a word screamed somewhere in the middle of the sentence while she gives herself an intentional facial contortion that makes her seem like she is making fun of mentally handicapped people. She also never stops rocking or moving her feet. And her hands remain in the same position the entire film. It's a farce. I look at it and I think, "How could anyone be seriously moved by this?" But that was clearly the intent. Failure by Rosie on every possible front.

Andie McDowell. Well, she is fine (and by "fine" I mean she doesn't single handedly ruin the film) when she is only asked to be mildly attractive with a southern drawl. If you ask her to do more than that, she is going to let you down. Well, they asked her to do a whole lot more than that in this film. She failed. Repeatedly. Egregiously. I am in the camp that thinks her performance is even worse than Rosie, because at least Rosie was being different than Rosie is in real life. This was Andie McDowell as we have always seen her. Trouble is, in Groudhog Day she is required to be mildly attractive with a southern drawl, in this movie she is required to have a character arc. Her arc goes from acting like she's tired (which is my favorite of her scenes. Watch how you can almost tangibly see her say "what do I do when I am tired. I know. I yawn and stretch.") to saying she loves her sister. The character NEVER changes. She reacts to these two events with the same exact reactions. Inflection, apparently, is something she thinks you can cover up with L'Oreal.

I could go on, but what's the point. These are the two central performances in the film and they are laughably bad from start to finish. That's the key, though. They are LAUGHABLY bad. So watch this movie and laugh at it. Don't feel bad, either. You're not laughing at people who are different than you. You are laughing at AWFUL actresses, although I HOPE they are different from you as well.