Le triomphe des innocents

there is not a single thing about this movie that is believable. More plot holes than you can count. Scott Glenn is somewhat miscast as an FBI agent. Plus, the do-good mentality of the movie is somewhat a put-off. Finally, the female character, Lamar, is very odd. She does not dress like any federal agent has ever dressed, except perhaps at Holloween. Some weird clown-tie and overcoat getup. Whose idea was that? Beyond stupid. This was filmed in 1994. computers of that day could barely turn on, much less do what this movie shows. It is interesting to compare this to Crimminal Minds. Still, it is a one of a kind movie, and so should be seen just for that.

I love this movie i ran across it in the middle of the night at like 2am and omg it is so wonderful very scary and just grabs hold of you and takes you into it i tell everyone about this movie that i think is better then silence of the lambs and more complex and interesting watch it if you dare

A better-than-many serial killer movie. I liked it well enough to see it twice on cable and even to recommend it. I found it dark and brooding. The acting was more than acceptable and, although the genius of the child was, perhaps, not completely credulous, it also wasn't totally unbelievable. The build up to the finale was well planned and the last fifteen minutes kept me on the edge of my seat.

Scott Glenn fresh off his role in 'Silence of the Lambs' turns up in the 'Slaughter of the Innocent' with a box cover holding a shotgun in an FBI jacket and an ominous tone. It didn't have to do anything more to get a rental from me. Then just like everyone else, I come to find this serial killer pic dragged down by a left field child element. 20+ years later hasn't done much to dull an odd mix of serious & silly.

FBI Agent Stephen Broderick (Glenn) is alerted to inconsistencies in a solved case by his young son Jesse (Jesse Cameron-Glickenhaus) just as the convicted is about to be sentenced to death. Stephen is too late to save the man, but it's conclusively proven after the fact he was innocent. Mordecai (Zitto Kazann) continuing his insane religious crusade to recreate Noah's Ark as both close in.

The credit sequence, intro murder is dated, but also effective in being creepy. Followed up with the son in question typing out details of a murder at a computer surrounded by other gizmos. Not the picture of a healthy, innocent 12 year old and it continues ramping up throughout the movie. If you can put this massive piece of believability aside then comes the requisite cliches, red herrings and overblown theatrics.

A lot of reviewers like to zero in the nepotism going on between writer / director father and actor son. It's not unwarranted, but the real issue is the story top to bottom. Even actor Glenn - a total pro - has to fight to look comfortable in scenes where his son talks to him about heavy stuff. Well shot all things considered, but a letdown otherwise. Sheila Tousey (Thunderheart) a fellow FBI Agent, Kevin Sorbo a stuffy bureaucrat at the Agency and in an early role Aaron Eckhart as a gung-ho SWAT team leader.

Do you like mysteries? Me too. Here is a big mystery: why Scott Glenn, who worked with Demmi (thrice), Altman (twice) as well as Kaufman, Figgis, Howard, Frankenheimer, Towne and Coppola, agreed to play in such bull****?! In "Slaughter of the Innocents" (directed by James Glickenhaus) Glenn plays an FBI agent who tracks down a ritual killer. The only person who can help him to solve the case is his little son. As the boy is ten times smarter than all the FBI, he alone can create a special multi-search program on his personal computer and find an evil maniac who builds a new Noah's Ark. By the way, young wunderkind is played by some Jesse Cameron-Glickenhaus - have you got it? Naturally, he is cute and fearless. He plays baseball, rides the motorcycle and easily sneaks through the airport controls as he travels by plane to the place of crime. He even chats with his father about pubic hairs in the victim's mouth. Maybe the script looked like a parody on "The Silence of the Lambs" and Glenn decided to dilute his macho image with a little humour? Maybe Glickenhaus decided to turn his opus to dramatic course when he saw that it doesn't work as comedy? Still a mystery.