Qui dit mieux?

Maybe not the best of Laurel and Hardy's many short subjects, but definitely has some novel twists--such as having them pull the sequence to a close by sliding the image across the screen to make way for the next shot. And the ending is a clever switch of the Laurel and Hardy personalities after a blood transfusion goes awry.

The boys begin by pulling a "who gave who the money to pay so and so" that's about as classic as the Abbott and Costello "Who's on first?" routine. DAPHNE POLLARD is Oliver Hardy's harassed wife who is so diminutive that she has to climb a chair in order to hit him over the head with a frying pan after one of his crazy schemes (at an auction) ends up with him having to turn over all their money for a grandfather clock which gets crushed by a truck.

Enjoyable romp for Laurel and Hardy fans. The twist ending serves as the icing on the cake.

Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy were comedic geniuses, individually and together, and their partnership was deservedly iconic and one of the best there was. They left behind a large body of work, a vast majority of it being entertaining to classic comedy, at their best they were hilarious and their best efforts were great examples of how to do comedy without being juvenile or distasteful.

Although more than fine in its own right, 'Thicker Than Water' is most notable for being their last short film, meaning them in the lead roles and not just a cameo appearance. Didn't find 'Thicker Than Water' one of the duo's best, in a filmography that was mostly solid to classic (only '45 Minutes from Hollywood' misfired for me but that was very early on when their partnership and style hadn't formed or evolved and when Hardy especially was not being used well), nonetheless it is still very good and has much of what makes Laurel and Hardy's work as appealing as it is.

Flaws are very little and more nit-picks really. The story is slight and a bit disjointed.

Do also agree to an extent that while the ending is very funny, it also felt a little tacked on.

More often than not though, 'Thicker Than Water' is great fun, not always hilarious but has enough amusing parts. It is never too silly, it doesn't lose its energy and the sly wit is here, some of the material may not be new but how it's executed actually doesn't feel too familiar and it doesn't get repetitive. The physical comedy comes thick and fast and choreographed and performed beautifully, and the witty verbal interplay shines every bit as much. The beginning is one of the duo's funniest.

Laurel and Hardy are on top form here, both are well used, both have material worthy of them and they're equal rather than one being funnier than the other (before Laurel tended to be funnier and more interesting than Hardy, who tended to be underused). Their chemistry sparkles and after taking time their early efforts to fully form it certainly felt well established from 'Two Tars' onwards and since then has not let up. Their comic timing is impeccable, both in the physical comedy than the verbal.

'Thicker Than Water' looks good visually, the energy is there from start to finish and the direction shows a sense of being at ease with the material and doesn't let it get too busy or static. Daphne Pollard and James Finlayson are great support.

Overall, very good. Not essential or classic Laurel and Hardy, but a good representation of them. 8/10 Bethany Cox

Thicker Than Water is another Laurel and Hardy short directed by James W. Horne, and while the actors and producers of these silent/early-talkie shorts get much more credit than the directors behind them, something must be said about Horne's involvement with the Laurel and Hardy shorts, predominately the ones in the late twenties and early-to-mid-thirties. For starters, Horne's shorts, speaking of this particular one and Big Business from 1929, have the narrative consistency of being manic and developing a one-thing-leads-to-another scenario, stockpiled with hilarious mixups and misunderstandings. Then there's the fact that both of these shorts have the ability to keep accelerating in their zaniness, in such a way that is hilarious to watch and never burdensome or overbearing.

Thicker Than Water concerns Stan and Ollie, who are just about to head to the local baseball game when Ollie's wife (Daphne Pollard) scolds Ollie for ditching her with all the dishes and forces both men to wash them before leaving. After a hilarious scene, exercising Horne's directorial formula of filming various things accelerate into complete chaos, a man shows up to collect payment for some furniture Ollie and his wife bought. Following a miscommunication in funds, Stan and Ollie must withdraw the couple's savings from the bank to buy the furniture.

The scene doesn't stop there, with a whole new set of craziness awaiting at a local auction house, followed by the inevitable scolding of Stan and Ollie by Mrs. Hardy when they arrive home. Thicker Than Water shows an exuberant amount of comedic energy on part of its performers, as almost every Laurel and Hardy short does in some way, and, thanks to the incredible situational and slapstick writing by Stan Laurel and Frank Tashlin, Thicker Than Water never becomes tired or redundant in its pursuit of laughs and potboiler comedy. As the final short that featured both men in starring roles, it may not be what everyone was expecting, but it certainly is a hilarious offering. If only maybe Laurel and Hardy knew their career together was over would they have tried to conclude their work with a bang.

Starring: Stan Laurel, Oliver Hardy, and Daphne Pollard. Directed by: James W. Horne.

Thicker Than Water is one of Laurel and Hardy's more consistently funny shorts. It sees Ollie being henpecked by his tiny wife (Daphne Pollard), but when Stan suggests that Ollie take charge, things go terribly wrong (how could taking advice from Laurel be anything but trouble?).

The film kicks off with an amusing washing up routine, Ollie cleaning the plates, with Stan drying them and then passing them back to Ollie to wash again. When Ollie sees what Stan has been doing he tells him to put the plates elsewhere, so Stan stacks them on a lit gas burner; Ollie picks them up to put them in the cupboard, burns his hands and drops all of the crockery. So far, so chucklesome.

A little later, Laurel and Hardy regular co-star James Finlayson arrives at the house to collect payment for the Hardy's furniture, which leads to a clever verbal exchange between all of the characters akin to Abbott and Costello's famous 'Who's on first?' routine. Following this, Stan tells Ollie that he should pay for the furniture outright with his savings, but Mrs. Hardy disagrees. Egged on by Stan, Ollie goes to the bank to withdraw the cash, but instead of paying for the furniture, he mistakenly spends the money on a grandfather clock in an auction (the price going sky high thanks to Stan). On their way home with their purchase, the clock is smashed to pieces by a lorry.

When Mrs. Hardy discovers what has happened, she loses her cool and hits her husband over the head with a frying pan (climbing on a chair to do so). In hospital, Ollie requires a blood transfusion, with Stan as the donor, and the results are unexpectedly bizarre.

Not only does this short deliver solid laughs at regular intervals, but it also features some wonderful transitions, Stan pulling the next scene from the side and dragging it across the screen. It's clever stuff for the time and really adds to the fun.

I won't wade into the same territory that others have. I think the dish washing scene was perhaps the most "Laurel and Hardy-esque" scene in the film, but the one in Helpmates was better.

Personally I felt that the banter about who gave the money to whom went on a bit longer than it needed to. I hope audiences in 1935 found it more engaging than I did.

The main reason I wanted to write a review is that I was impressed by the creative and clever way they handled scene changes from the Hardy house to other locations. Stanley grabs what might be some sort of pocket door or panel (if it were a real house) and pulls on its thick black border to walk it across the screen. The scene changes with it. In one of these clever "wipes" he accidentally lets go and it returns to the right side of the screen. So he grabs it again and walks it across the room. The scene change follows the movement of this panel. I haven't seen this trick done before. And being that this was decades before green screen, it must have been rather labor intensive to handle it in the cutting room. Bravo for this quirky little technique!