Les trois âges

"The Three Ages," Buster Keaton's first feature-length film after a number of comedy shorts, is his parody of Griffith's "Intolerance." Keaton tells three parallel stories about the perils of romance, one set in the Stone Age, one during the Roman Empire, and one during the 20th century.

In the context of Keaton, I don't see "The Three Ages" given a lot of mention. This is a shame, since while it's not Keaton's finest work, it ranks with his funniest. In one scene, Buster falls into a pit with a lion. Afraid of getting eaten, he pampers the lion and gives it a manicure. What follows is one of the funniest visual gags I've ever seen.

I'd have to rate this as slightly above-average Keaton fare. It shows Buster trying to romance the girl away from Wallace Beery, and what would have transpired if the story had taken place in (1) the Stone Age; (2) The Roman Age, and (3) The Modern Age.

I liked them in that order, too, with more laughs with the older periods of time, although I laughed at the hardest at a couple of segments in the Roman Age. My favorite was the chariot race held in the sand. That had a number of clever things in the segment. The brief bit with the lion was funny, too, sort of a parody of the Biblical story of Daniel in the lion's den.

They were smart only going five minutes or so with each age and then going back with the story each time. Each "age" had four or five segments in total.

Nothing hilarious but definitely worth your time if you are checking out silent film comedies

Buster presents love stories from three periods in history - the Stone Age, the Roman Age, and the Modern Age. In each, he vies for the affection of a young woman with another man, thus illustrating that emotions like love and jealousy have been constant for time immemorial, a contrast to what D. W. Griffith was trying to highlight in Intolerance, which Buster was parodying.

While the three stories are interleaved together, it's notable that at a 63 minute runtime, this is essentially three two-reel shorts put together. As Keaton put it, "Cut the film apart and then splice up the three periods, each one separately, and you will have three complete two-reel films."

The Stone Age story has lots of gags that The Flintstones would later borrow, such as prehistoric golfing, taking dictation by chiseling into a stone, and presenting a business card comprised of a small slab of rock with a crude likeness drawn on it. Buster standing atop a dinosaur, despite the bad science and primitive stop-motion effects, made me smile. The best moment, however, was when he tries to arouse jealousy in his beloved by attempting to grab another woman by the hair and take charge of her, only to find she's at least a foot taller than him. She knocks him off the rock and we get that marvelous shot of him look up into the camera on the way down to a pond below, kissing his fingers before spreading his arms wide.

The Roman Age story has a lot of the same types of visual gags, like a wristwatch made with a sundial, Buster playing an impromptu game of craps with dice with Roman numerals on the sides, and him pulling his chariot up to a "No parking" sign in Latin (naturally, mistranslating Non Postum Exit). The best gag was when he engages in a chariot race in the hippodrome using one pulled by dogs. When one starts slowing down, he replaces it like a spare tire with another that's stashed in his trunk, which was hilarious.

The Modern Age of "speed, need, and greed" features some amusing moments on the gridiron, like Buster being propped up by an opponent so he can be knocked down each play, and handing the ball off when he's about to be creamed on a punt return. There's also a clever getaway shot from above where he goes through one taxi to another faced in the opposite direction, and when the two cabs drive off, his pursuers think he's in the first. Nothing tops that extraordinary leap from one building to another, however, where Buster missed the jump in real life. While there was a safety net 35 feet below him, he hit it hard and awkwardly enough that he injured his knees, hips, and elbows, and had to stay in bed for several days afterwards. How he then improvised the awnings and slid into the fire department was brilliant, and "the biggest laughing sequence in the picture...because I missed it in the original trick," as he put it.

Overall the film wasn't helped by being so drawn out as the pace of the jokes probably could have been faster, but there's a lot to like here. Pretty cute ending too.

For me, Keaton's decision to make a parody of Griffith's Intolerance so that if the feature (his first) failed he could re-edit and release it as three two-reelers is what diminishes the enjoyment for me. The film jumps back and forth between the three time periods, and so all of them seem to be over before they've really begun, and the film has something of a disjointed feel. Perhaps this is because the film does actually feel as if it is three two-reelers spliced together rather than an actual feature.

The comedy is unevenly paced, but when it hits the mark it is near-perfect. Highlights include Keaton's drunken encounter with Wallace Beery, other diners, and a crab at a restaurant, and the jaw-dropping leap from one roof to another at what looks like hundreds of feet above the ground (apparently the buildings were short sets placed on a bridge overlooking a view of Los Angeles. Just as well, because Keaton failed to make the leap successfully and fell from the second building, a real-life mishap that remains in the film). Keaton slides through a window, across a room, down a pole (at this point we realise he is in a fire station although he doesn't) and lands on the back of a fire engine that returns him to the police station from which he has just escaped. The whole sequence is both side-splitting and astounding. The look on Keaton's face as he looks quizzically up at the pole he has just descended is priceless. Perhaps because of his status as a comic genius we tend to forget how good an actor Keaton was .

I liked the modern sequence best, and had it been released as a short I believe it would be considered one of his classics. The caveman sequence is OK, but the Roman era story tends to drag.

It's been well publicised that this was competition winner Margaret Leahy's only film because she was so untalented as an actress, and it's true she doesn't light any fires while on-screen. But the impact of her ineptitude in front of the camera is cleverly avoided by the likes of Keaton and Beery merely acting around her as if she were just another prop.

Overall, this isn't one of Keaton's best - although that is probably because this is his first feature. Keaton himself thought it was just OK and, given his instinctive sense for what works, perhaps that should tell us all we need to know...

The more time I spend with old films, the more of a giant I see Keaton to be. I'm beginning to think that we all need to see a lot of him, which is why I wandered into this. It seems to have been made only because they had access to a Roman set.

The setup is that a courtship story is presented in three eras: a cave-man setup, a Roman context and a modern one. All are based on film notions of those eras of course. Unlike most movie humor of the time, the joke here isn't in embellishing the story with humorous decoration. Its in the difference among the stories.

Its a clever piece of what I call folding, and you will see at least one scene here that I swear is quoted in "Rashomon."

So there's the idea of the thing, which is worthwhile, but now I've explained it, you hardly have to see it. The jokes are trite. But there is one scene that I recall over and over. I think Keaton did it elsewhere and several others too, but here it is the best.

He's driving a car, a rickety one to his girl's house. (This is in the modern setting, obviously.) He hits a bump and the car falls to pieces. And I just don't mean the wheels fall off, the car quite literally disassembles into the parts that went into the factory and there he sits among hundreds of items. I have no idea how he did this. The car really is moving as a car, and then in an instant it is in pieces.

Wonderful.

Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.