Ugly Delicious

Liked the first couple episodes but by episode four the host started sounding like a condescending pr%#k.

Due to Netflix I am sure that David is getting a global audience, which is great. All the places he and his crew visit to find the perfect food is fantastic, the in depth commentairy about the topics are insanely well done as well. Almost a 10/10 for me, giving it just 1 minus point. This is for the 'racial' topic, something that is truely an american thing. Not that this does not need to be mentioned, it just does not need to come back that much. It is a topic for a whole different kind of documentairy. Besides that, I am greatly looking forward to Season 2.

Enjoyed the show and the commentary, but David Chang is so opinionated as a person- just don't like his personality- that it takes away from the show.

I'm going to start by saying that those who complaint about the amount of political debates in the show, most probably is because they don't agree with Chang's position. But I do... Food is by far, the greatest way to represent a culture, and how much we value some food reflects perfectly how we value the culture behind it. And maybe it's about time that people in the states understand that all this food they like and often consider as their own, comes from cultures such as mexican, chinese, and black people, that deserves to be respected as well. I'm a huge fan of Chang since Mind of a Chef, he is very honest and is not afraid of having uncomfortable conversations, and racism in the food industry is one of those. That being said, the show is great: casual conversations among friends and experts, lots of delicious food, and a beautiful effort of showing that the greatest food of all is not in the expensive, elitist restaurants, but the one you share with your loved ones and is cooked with intention and feeling.

I enjoy Chang's stance against culinary orthodoxy, even if I don't always agree with it. He equates it with rigidity, and there is some truth to that, when you have some self-styled institute in Naples deciding what is and is not pizza, or things like those ultra-stuffy French contests. But there is value in keeping traditions and maintaining the purity, if you will, of certain foods just because they're really good. You can also still have fusions and crossover, but not everyone has to be busting through the old way to be appreciated. There is something deeply satisfying about, say, a traditional shrimp etouffe or cheese blintz or Peking duck.

I do not at all understand the complaints about it being too political. The history of different foods is to some extent the story of the cultures who make that food. And sometimes those cultures clash. I found it fascinating that he was riding around on the white guys' boats when the Vietnamese shrimpers started working in the Gulf coast. I'm guessing most of the complaints about it being political came from white people, because they get nervous talking about race. But when you're talking to Asians who came to the US, part of the experience that forms the food they serve is how they were received in the US, and how subsequent generations view the situation. For an Asian-American, race is always a thing. He's dealing with his and others' reality. Food is deeply ethnic.

One last thing: I love the music choices. Very cool.