An assassin seeks redemption after being given a second chance at life.An assassin seeks redemption after being given a second chance at life.An assassin seeks redemption after being given a second chance at life.
Qing Xu
- Lin Bisset
- (as Xu Qing)
Susan Ling Young
- Vicky Liu
- (as Susan Young)
Alex Anastasopoulos
- Sniper
- (as Alex Anlos)
Brendan Sean Murray
- Zee, Red Mountain Leader
- (as Brendan Murray)
Marty Kintu
- Technician
- (as Marty Kinto)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
60U
With an interesting plot and Ethan Hawke in the lead, it's baffling how this movie turned out so mediocre. 24 Hours To Live has some cool John Wick action scenes but they can be easily overlooked by the flawed and predictable story that left me bored halfway through.
I know Ethan Hawke used to starring in a lot of action movie but he never strike the lead action hero in my eyes until i saw 24 Hours to Live.His always sad and tired face intentional or unintentional make he fit the role perfectly that add a lot of emotional into the cliché dialogue.The movie is pure action from start to finish make it a good Saturday night flick when you lazy to go out.The ending is terrible btw
Well, here goes. I had low expectations, even though the viewer ratings were all over the board. It was fun, exciting, and had a lot of action. It was somewhat different than the John Wick references, but I can understand the comparison. It was science fiction folks, and I don't watch science fiction. But I did watch this movie because I didn't realize it was in fact science fiction. Ethan Hawke, the star who I've never appreciated before, did a dandy job. My opinion of his acting skills took a giant leap forward. Well done, Ethan, you finally deserve some respect.
This film tells the story of an assassin, who is shot by the bodyguard of the target he has to assassinate. He is mysteriously revived and is given another mission that lasts for 24 hours.
I keep thinking there is something wrong with this film, but I can't pinpoint what it is. Maybe it's because of the absurdity of reviving someone for 24 hours. Why try and succeed in the mission, when you'll die in 24 hours regardless of success or failure? Another thing is that there seems to be a lot of movie logic present. Why use an office that is completely exposed to being shot, when you're interviewing a high value target? The story doesn't make much sense.
I keep thinking there is something wrong with this film, but I can't pinpoint what it is. Maybe it's because of the absurdity of reviving someone for 24 hours. Why try and succeed in the mission, when you'll die in 24 hours regardless of success or failure? Another thing is that there seems to be a lot of movie logic present. Why use an office that is completely exposed to being shot, when you're interviewing a high value target? The story doesn't make much sense.
1. Bad CGI. The use of CG blood ruined the parts that could have been really good. I don't see any reviews here pointing this out like in many other movies (John Wick) that use this shi**y effect and rarely gets called out. Imagine if they used the tried and tested blood squib, it would totally change the quality of this film.
2. The action is good overall but its lacking oomph. The pacing feels rushed. A lot of times the sound effects are not on point. The background music would drown the gunshots and everything else. The gun shots can range as loud as the footsteps. The balance is off.
3. Plot holes, some characters would know things that they shouldn't and would be in places that are questionable.
That being said, the story was surprisingly decent. There was chemistry between the characters. I like Travis' portrayal. I was able to connect with him without the story cheating. You don't get to see exactly what happened to his past or how it happened, it is unraveled bit by bit as the story goes.
Despite all of these flaws, it still came out decent. If only the things I've mentioned were put into use this film could even score as high as 8/10.
2. The action is good overall but its lacking oomph. The pacing feels rushed. A lot of times the sound effects are not on point. The background music would drown the gunshots and everything else. The gun shots can range as loud as the footsteps. The balance is off.
3. Plot holes, some characters would know things that they shouldn't and would be in places that are questionable.
That being said, the story was surprisingly decent. There was chemistry between the characters. I like Travis' portrayal. I was able to connect with him without the story cheating. You don't get to see exactly what happened to his past or how it happened, it is unraveled bit by bit as the story goes.
Despite all of these flaws, it still came out decent. If only the things I've mentioned were put into use this film could even score as high as 8/10.
Did you know
- TriviaNot interested in participating in this program at this time!
- GoofsIn the beginning beach scene it said Key West, Florida for its location. There are no mountains in the Florida keys.
- Quotes
Travis Conrad: I don't want to kill you. I want the fish to like me.
- ConnectionsReferences New-York 1997 (1981)
- SoundtracksSunrise Blues
Written by Charles Morgan
Performed by Chuck Morgan and The Front Page
- How long is 24 Hours to Live?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Languages
- Also known as
- 24 horas para sobrevivir
- Filming locations
- Cape Town, South Africa(Red Mountain Base)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $5,805,201
- Runtime1 hour 33 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content