IMDb RATING
4.6/10
3.4K
YOUR RATING
A time machine's tested first time by a man in the team traveling 1 hour into the future. He returns to warn them against killings in the next hour. Is it possible to change things in the "p... Read allA time machine's tested first time by a man in the team traveling 1 hour into the future. He returns to warn them against killings in the next hour. Is it possible to change things in the "past"? Twist after twist follow.A time machine's tested first time by a man in the team traveling 1 hour into the future. He returns to warn them against killings in the next hour. Is it possible to change things in the "past"? Twist after twist follow.
Dustin Cornelius
- SWAT Team
- (as Dustin Cornielius)
John Nania
- SWAT Team
- (as John Narnia)
Eric Perrodin
- SWAT Team
- (as Eric Perridon)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The acting was slightly ropey at the start but once the story got going it evened out a bit. The antagonistic behaviour between the scientists very badly over done and didn't add a lot to the story. Nice little time paradox story and worth a watch. If a little bit more money was available for special effects and some scenes reshot with more finesse it could have been quite good.
I wish they'd mention somewhere this is based on 11 A.M. or Yeolhansi the Korean sci-fi film which in my opinion was far superior.
Over-all it's a fun film and I liked the changes they made to the storyline but again the original is fantastic!
Over-all it's a fun film and I liked the changes they made to the storyline but again the original is fantastic!
I've read the reviews on here and I tend to agree with all of them - Yes, I agree with the people who criticised it AND the people who loved it.
Is it low budget? Yes
Are the opening scenes and character exposition a little "amateur"? Yes
Is it poorly acted? For some of the lesser characters, perhaps.
Is it a very good idea for a time travel thriller? Yes
Has the time travel plot been meticulously planned? Yes, Kudos!
Is the overarching story line well executed? Yes
Are the lead actors and actresses engaging? Yes
Does it make you think, even after the movie has ended? Yes - and that's bang for buck!
Does it make sense? Yes
So that's it - a good idea for a film with a couple of interesting characters and relationships that,based around time travel, and a good time travel plot (which is a rare thing)
It didn't set the world on fire - low budget time travel films never do.
Zoe Bell probably was the best of the actors - I read on here she is also a stunt woman - which makes a lot of sense - She has a great physique and the director knew how to use her skills and assets - Reminded me a little of Sigourney Weaver in Galaxy Quest!
The other actors were a little forgettable, sadly.
So over all - some poor performances and a slightly amateur exposition did not diminish from the stronger points of the movie, which were a good time travel synopsis that was well executed and a good performance from Zoe Bell.
Is it low budget? Yes
Are the opening scenes and character exposition a little "amateur"? Yes
Is it poorly acted? For some of the lesser characters, perhaps.
Is it a very good idea for a time travel thriller? Yes
Has the time travel plot been meticulously planned? Yes, Kudos!
Is the overarching story line well executed? Yes
Are the lead actors and actresses engaging? Yes
Does it make you think, even after the movie has ended? Yes - and that's bang for buck!
Does it make sense? Yes
So that's it - a good idea for a film with a couple of interesting characters and relationships that,based around time travel, and a good time travel plot (which is a rare thing)
It didn't set the world on fire - low budget time travel films never do.
Zoe Bell probably was the best of the actors - I read on here she is also a stunt woman - which makes a lot of sense - She has a great physique and the director knew how to use her skills and assets - Reminded me a little of Sigourney Weaver in Galaxy Quest!
The other actors were a little forgettable, sadly.
So over all - some poor performances and a slightly amateur exposition did not diminish from the stronger points of the movie, which were a good time travel synopsis that was well executed and a good performance from Zoe Bell.
Clearly this is made on a relative small budget for straight to TV\DVD release, which maybe some should consider if scoring based on films with ten to a hundred times the budget with visuals to match.
So I try to review based more on acting and story. The first 15 minutes or so of acting in fairness did seen rather poor but certainly picked up during the film.
Sadly the time machine itself seemed very unrealistic and I was left feeling they could have put far more effort into that than they did with what seemed like nothing more than a bit of stage rigging that you often see in pop-up form in shopping centers etc when they have "celebrity" appearances etc. However I tried to not let that bother me to much and just try to enjoy what was clearly a budget film. Soundtrack was decent enough and certainly helped with the atmosphere for the film quite a lot so top marks on that.
The story itself was certainly above average for these budget films and no real pointless angles or daft endings even if a very slight twist in the end. Sure, if you over analyze the script and scenes you will find plot holes to complain about quite easily. But it's not supposed to be or claiming to be a factually or theoretically correct on the script front. If your willing to just sit and watch the film without over analyzing or judging it to much based on budget it's quite an enjoyable film to fill 90 minutes.
So I try to review based more on acting and story. The first 15 minutes or so of acting in fairness did seen rather poor but certainly picked up during the film.
Sadly the time machine itself seemed very unrealistic and I was left feeling they could have put far more effort into that than they did with what seemed like nothing more than a bit of stage rigging that you often see in pop-up form in shopping centers etc when they have "celebrity" appearances etc. However I tried to not let that bother me to much and just try to enjoy what was clearly a budget film. Soundtrack was decent enough and certainly helped with the atmosphere for the film quite a lot so top marks on that.
The story itself was certainly above average for these budget films and no real pointless angles or daft endings even if a very slight twist in the end. Sure, if you over analyze the script and scenes you will find plot holes to complain about quite easily. But it's not supposed to be or claiming to be a factually or theoretically correct on the script front. If your willing to just sit and watch the film without over analyzing or judging it to much based on budget it's quite an enjoyable film to fill 90 minutes.
I was tricked into giving this one some time by the first 2 reviews in the list. They lied. While the story synopsis implies there might be an interesting sci fi setup floating about, the first 10 mins of terrible acting, stale scenes and exposition make you not care about waiting to find out. The first scene was like an 80s kids drama of 'acting'. All fake urgency and 'drama'. The next scene with 2 cops in a car giving us the run down on the central group of scientists they were watching dragged on for what seemed like hours. I'm not sure it ever stopped. The 'scientists' were giving it their best 'teen 80s delinquent' impersonations which made me wonder if this movie was a tongue in cheek nod to those crappy movies of that period, (like we need more of them?), but that thought soon left my mind as I wished it to be over as soon as possible, but that wasn't going to happen till the full 90 minutes of excruciating was over. This is not worth your time. It's not clever, it's not funny, it's just boring, and badly done at that.
Did you know
- TriviaAll entries contain spoilers
- Quotes
Security Guard #2: What are you, five?
Van Ling: Don't fuck with me. I'm on edge.
- ConnectionsReferenced in The Chronic Rift: Time Loop-de-Loops (2018)
- How long is Paradox?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Cái Chết Đến Từ Tương Lai
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 30m(90 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content