Braxton

I've watched a lot of slasher movies over the years and this ranks as one of the worst. Terrible acting, plot holes you could drive lorry through, and writing that is trite and formulaic beyond belief.

Now, some terrible films transcend how awful they are and can be unintentionally very funny.

This isn't one of them.

The cast looks as real as you can get and not like actors, and honestly they did a fine job. I wasn't bored watching and I liked this low budget horror. I watch ALL low budget horror and have a lot to compare it to. This had a good guessing game to it.

While it's easy to point out the flaws with the overall look or writing, the film is admirable for it's place in the untapped area of northern irish horror. The film's gimmicks and ultimate twist, while cliche, are surprising and take different routes than you'd expect.

Hearing characters speak and act like irish teenagers is a great change of pace from cheesy American slashers, making the film feel like more of a love letter to American horror movies mixed in with it's own sense of personality.

Still, a passion for horror mixed with great song choices don't take away the feeling that some characters were unrealistically written in times, especially those characters who dismiss the brutal murder of their close friends.

All and all, the film should be taken as what it is, an a tribute to 90s horror in regards to movies like Scream and I know what you did last summer, as well as choices such as twist villains, cop characters and teen rock music. So when you take it as such, the film impresses and goes beyond others in the genre that lack the soul or the sense of humour.

This movie sucked but had a good twist to it. It is boaring up until the end. I wouldn't recommend watching it

Penny Candy at Halloween. I thought it was ok movie, nothing great or special but not terrible either. Def not deserving of a 1. I mean the Horror genre & it's cousins have put out some of the best but also the some of the worst movies ever. No way should this be given a 1 unless the rater has only seen 10 movies in lifetime & this was the worst. Otherwise any1 gonna giving out 1/10's is lazy & shouldn't be trusted. I don't care how much BS analysis they spit out bout plot holes, bad acting, or the "it's already been done". No bleep Sherlock, there are thousands of movies out every yr for the last century. U go ahead & write ova a million novels & I promise you that your not gonna be a genius who finds a way to avoid an overlapping subplot eventually let alone main plot. It's all been done by now. It's just how the screen writers, directors & actors package their story that makes it unique. But I'm tired of 1's in rating, especially in movies that are clearly average. Not like a 2-4 is a good rating but certainly isn't a 1 which should be reserved for movies u basically turn-off They so bad. Yeah we all have rights & rights to opinions, but if u give 1's out your rating privelage is provoked. U can still rate but no1 is gonna give your analysis a lick of consideration cuz it's a joke. This movie wasn't bad, it was average for production time & genre. British girls are cute & acting wasn't bad at all. People who give this a 1 prob give the movie "stitches" a 1 & that's when u know they can't be trusted. Cuz stitches is 1 badass movie & prob a 7 & so this falls about 3 pegs down