AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,0/10
861
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Segunda Guerra Mundial, o Reino Unido se mobiliza contra o avanço dos nazistas.Segunda Guerra Mundial, o Reino Unido se mobiliza contra o avanço dos nazistas.Segunda Guerra Mundial, o Reino Unido se mobiliza contra o avanço dos nazistas.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
Nic Rasenti
- Duane K. Ash
- (as Nicolas Rasenti)
Avaliações em destaque
Cardboard aircraft that do not even look real, poor acting and locations that are obviously not European.
Certainly can tell it is a low budget film with no real dialogue, a total waste of viewing time!
Just about unwatchable, as others have said cgi was poor but that is not so important if the acting and story are good. Unfortunately that is not the case here and added to that the accents perporting to be English, Sa and Australian (I think?) Were just too bad to be believed. Avoid if you can.
Not your average war film, but rather an interesting look at the life of commonwealth pilots that served Britain during the war. The visual effects are not as great as many Hollywood productions, but this isn't a Hollywood production. Don't get me wrong, they are rather good on a high definition screen, but I was a little sad to see that the main air battle was short lived. The film is more about a bomber pilot and his crew, and their daring escape from occupied Europe. That being said, after watching the behind the scenes documentary that was also available on the Blu Ray, I have new found respect for the film makers. The director taught himself visual effects and took it unto himself to do all the work alone, for almost three years. One can easily see the passion, blood, sweat and tears thrown into the production. It's reminiscent of the old auteur filmmakers, which we do not see very often. One can not expect all films to have massive budgets and for that I completely forgive the lack of "quality', if you can call it that, in the air battle scenes. Once on the ground, the film takes a different direction and I found the slow pace reminded me of older films I had watched in my younger days. I can see this film will not appeal to a younger audience who are used to the fast paced action scenes that make up the majority of films today. Unfortunately it won't be remembered as one of the great war films, but it was enjoyable none the less. If you're looking for a fast thrill, skip this film, it requires more commitment from its audience.
Not sure where to start with this one - it is obvious that the writer/director wanted to honour the South African volunteers who served, very capably in the RAF during the WWII. Unfortunately this load of rubbish does them no honour at all.
The research, if indeed there actually was any, is slapdash in the extreme (a medic carrying a rifle? the "hero" in tropical brown in place of RAF blue? etc. etc.). The uniforms and background ideas (RAF daylight bombing???) are just ridiculous and even the ranks are incorrect (how hard is it to get those right?). To list all of the obvious errors would probably take more text than the full wooden script.
I could go on about this but all could have been tolerable if the acting had been even competent but, to be honest, I have seen better at the local 'AmDram'. There is little attempt, so it appears, to actually do more than "read the lines" from a script that shows zero knowledge of WWII or the RAF with a crew that purports to be veteran but is so undisciplined that most wouldn't have managed more than a couple of months without a court martial.
Sadly I cannot see any saving grace in this movie - it really is a case of can I have the two hours of my life back please?
Don't waste your time.
The research, if indeed there actually was any, is slapdash in the extreme (a medic carrying a rifle? the "hero" in tropical brown in place of RAF blue? etc. etc.). The uniforms and background ideas (RAF daylight bombing???) are just ridiculous and even the ranks are incorrect (how hard is it to get those right?). To list all of the obvious errors would probably take more text than the full wooden script.
I could go on about this but all could have been tolerable if the acting had been even competent but, to be honest, I have seen better at the local 'AmDram'. There is little attempt, so it appears, to actually do more than "read the lines" from a script that shows zero knowledge of WWII or the RAF with a crew that purports to be veteran but is so undisciplined that most wouldn't have managed more than a couple of months without a court martial.
Sadly I cannot see any saving grace in this movie - it really is a case of can I have the two hours of my life back please?
Don't waste your time.
If you've quite finished with your special effects............. I'd like my Commodore64 back
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe British RAF did in fact operate the American-built Consolidated B-24 Liberator. They were ordered in 1940 but were only operational with the RAF from 1941. The RAF used the Mark II Liberator primarily in Coastal Command and Bomber Command (as depicted in this film), but also for carrying heavy cargo. Most of the aircraft were based in Britain and operated over Northern and Western Europe, but they also saw service in North Africa and the Middle East.
- Erros de gravaçãoThe German soldiers are supposedly SS troops but wear the Wehrmacht eagle on their uniforms and on the officers forage cap. Also, at least one soldier is seen wearing the GD cipher on their epaulets of the Grossdeutschland Division which never served on the Western Front, only the Eastern Front. Also the number plate on the Kubelwagon displays a number plate with incorrect lettering.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Angel of the Skies?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 30.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 38 min(98 min)
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente